Next Article in Journal
A Scientometric Study of Neurocomputing Publications (1992–2018): An Aerial Overview of Intrinsic Structure
Previous Article in Journal
An Exploration of the Sub-Register of Chemical Engineering Research Papers Published in English
Article Menu
Issue 3 (September) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessFeature PaperArticle
Publications 2018, 6(3), 31; https://doi.org/10.3390/publications6030031

The UK Scholarly Communication Licence: Attempting to Cut through the Gordian Knot of the Complexities of Funder Mandates, Publisher Embargoes and Researcher Caution in Achieving Open Access

1
UoN Libraries, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK
2
Information School, University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 211 Portobello, Sheffield S1 4DP, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 8 June 2018 / Revised: 3 July 2018 / Accepted: 4 July 2018 / Published: 13 July 2018
Full-Text   |   PDF [1541 KB, uploaded 4 September 2018]   |  
  |   Review Reports

Abstract

Whilst take-up of open access (OA) in the UK is growing rapidly due partly to a number of funder mandates, managing the complexities of balancing compliance with these mandates against restrictive publisher policies and ingrained academic priorities, has resulted in UK higher education institutions (HEIs) often struggling with confused researchers, complex workflows, and rising costs. In order to try to address this situation, the UK Scholarly Communication Licence (UK-SCL) was formulated to bypass the root causes of many of these challenges by implementing a licensing mechanism for multiple-mandate compliance in one single policy. This is the first empirical study to focus on the genesis of the UK-SCL and how its implementation has been conceived thus far. A qualitative research method was used, taking the form of 14 semi-structured interviews with key stakeholders from the initiative across the UK. The results indicate that those working within UK HEIs are concerned with the complexity of the current OA policy landscape and are frustrated with the inertia within the current system, which has resulted in higher costs, further publisher restrictions, and has not addressed the underlying tensions in academic culture. The UK-SCL is seen by its initiators as a way to achieve further transition towards OA and take back some element of control of the content produced at their institutions. The study concludes by modelling the ways in which the UK-SCL is intended to impact relationships between key stakeholders, and discussing possible implementation futures. View Full-Text
Keywords: copyright; UK-SCL; Scholarly Communication Licence; Scholarly Communications; higher education institutions; open access; licensing copyright; UK-SCL; Scholarly Communication Licence; Scholarly Communications; higher education institutions; open access; licensing
Figures

Graphical abstract

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).
SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Baldwin, J.; Pinfield, S. The UK Scholarly Communication Licence: Attempting to Cut through the Gordian Knot of the Complexities of Funder Mandates, Publisher Embargoes and Researcher Caution in Achieving Open Access. Publications 2018, 6, 31.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Publications EISSN 2304-6775 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top