1. Introduction
In the contemporary knowledge society, scientific research and technological development are fundamental pillars of national progress, innovation, and competitiveness. Scientific production—typically disseminated through peer-reviewed publications—serves as a critical indicator of a country’s ability to generate, apply, and share knowledge within the global research ecosystem (
Barbier, 2023;
Jack et al., 2021). Bibliometric analysis, as a methodological framework, has become increasingly essential to evaluate research output, monitor collaboration patterns, identify emerging thematic areas, and assess the visibility and influence of academic work across regions (
Choudhri et al., 2015;
Durieux & Gevenois, 2010;
Fang et al., 2025;
Hunt, 2011).
This analytical approach has proven especially valuable in examining disparities between countries and informing science policy decisions (
Ciocca & Delgado, 2017;
Godfrey et al., 2010;
Salager-Meyer, 2008). Through quantitative indicators, bibliometric studies contribute to the construction of evidence-based strategies for strengthening scientific systems, enhancing collaboration networks, and supporting innovation ecosystems in both developed and developing contexts (
Fadillah & Siregar, 2025;
Hoang, 2025;
Ramírez & Salcedo, 2023;
Sklavos et al., 2025;
Tomás-Górriz & Tomás-Casterá, 2018).
Despite growing interest in the scientometric mapping of Latin America, Central America remains significantly underrepresented in the global bibliometric literature (
Munguía-Mena & Picado, 2012). This gap not only limits the visibility of scientific efforts across the region but also hinders the formulation of effective, evidence-driven policies for research and development (
Adderly-Kelly, 2003;
Barros et al., 2025;
Godfrey et al., 2010;
Mutlu Avinç & Yıldız, 2025;
Ramírez & Salcedo, 2023). While countries such as Brazil, Mexico, and Argentina have been widely studied, systematic regional analyses covering Central America are virtually absent (
Hermes-Lima et al., 2007).
This study seeks to fill that void by providing a comprehensive, comparative, and critical bibliometric overview of research production in Central American countries over nearly three decades. The analysis aims to shed light on the evolution of research activity, collaboration dynamics, thematic priorities, and institutional leadership within the region, offering a data-driven foundation for regional science policy planning.
Over the past two decades, bibliometric studies have grown in both methodological rigor and disciplinary reach, supported by global citation databases such as Scopus and Web of Science (
González-Alcaide, 2021). Numerous regional and national-level analyses have been conducted across Latin America, focusing on productivity, thematic specialization, institutional networks, and international collaboration (
Gutiérrez-Sánchez et al., 2025;
Rama & Gregorutti, 2015). However, few such studies focus on Central America, and those that exist tend to be fragmented, institutionally bound, or thematically narrow (
Svenson, 2013,
2015;
Fernández & Murillo, 2018).
Available evidence indicates significant disparities among Central American countries. Costa Rica, Panama, and Guatemala account for the vast majority of indexed publications, while Belize, El Salvador, Honduras, and Nicaragua exhibit much lower research output, reflecting persistent structural barriers such as limited research funding, weak doctoral training programs, and insufficient institutional support (
Ramírez & Salcedo, 2023). Furthermore, a high dependency on international co-authorship—often exceeding 80% of publications—suggests an externally driven model of scientific production (
Huete-Pérez, 2013;
Casalet & Buenrostro, 2014;
Rivera-Rodríguez et al., 2025).
Despite these challenges, several institutions in the region have demonstrated research leadership and visibility. The University of Costa Rica, the University of Panama, and the Universidad del Valle de Guatemala are among those with growing scientific output. Thematically, the region’s research is concentrated in health sciences, agriculture, and environmental studies, with limited representation in engineering, mathematics, and the social sciences—a pattern shaped both by internal research capacity and external funding priorities (
Ramírez & Salcedo, 2023).
This article presents a bibliometric analysis of scientific output in the seven Central American countries—Belize, Guatemala, Honduras, El Salvador, Nicaragua, Costa Rica, and Panama—over the period 1996–2023, using Scopus as the primary data source.
More specifically, this study proposes to achieve the following:
- −
Quantify the total volume of scientific output generated by Central American countries.
- −
Examine the historical evolution and longitudinal trends.
- −
Identify the dominant thematic areas of research activity within the region.
- −
Determine the most productive countries in terms of scientific output.
- −
Assess the performance of leading universities, both in terms of publication volume and scholarly impact as measured by citation metrics.
- −
Highlight the most prominent researchers in the region.
2. Materials and Methods
This study follows a descriptive, quantitative, and bibliometric design aimed at analyzing the scientific production of the seven Central American countries—Belize, Guatemala, Honduras, El Salvador, Nicaragua, Costa Rica, and Panama—over the period from 1996 to 2023.
2.1. Data Source
The data were retrieved from the Scopus database (2024), selected for its broad coverage of peer-reviewed literature and its suitability for bibliometric analyses. Scopus provides metadata, including titles, abstracts, author affiliations, keywords, and citation metrics, which are essential for evaluating scientific output and collaboration networks. Scopus has been widely recognized in the bibliometric literature for its extensive journal coverage, standardized metadata, and reliability in evaluating research output and collaboration networks (
Durieux & Gevenois, 2010;
González-Alcaide, 2021).
2.2. Search Strategy
A systematic search was performed using country names as keywords, filtered by the affiliation field to capture only publications attributed to institutions located within the respective Central American countries. The search covered the years 1996 to 2023, the full time span available in Scopus for consistent longitudinal analysis. Only articles were considered; reviews, conference papers, editorials, notes, and errata were excluded.
The following procedure was applied to carry out the bibliometric analysis:
- −
In December 2024, the Scopus database was consulted using country affiliation as the initial search filter. The query was then refined by applying additional criteria: publication years (1996–2023), document type (article), and country/territory. As shown in
Table 1, the search equation and the initial results are presented, allowing for the construction of a country ranking. Each country was assigned a score from 1 to 7, where 1 corresponds to the country with the highest number of published articles and 7 to the country with the lowest total output indexed in the database.
The retrieval of articles was carried out using the advanced search option in Scopus. The general search equation applied was
This generic strategy was executed iteratively, including one country per search iteration. To ensure the accurate attribution of records to institutional affiliations within each country, an iterative process was conducted to refine the search strategy. Several trial queries were initially tested, and based on this validation, seven independent queries—one per Central American country—were established as the final strategy (see
Table 1). Each query was executed in Scopus, and the results were downloaded in CSV format, including bibliographic and citation metadata.
- −
A total of 37,555 records were downloaded using the “Export” option available on the Scopus platform, selecting the CSV file format. All documents were extracted by country, applying the following filters: (a) citation information (document title, author(s), year, source title, and citation count), and (b) bibliographic information (affiliation and language of the original document).
- −
Once the database was downloaded, the records were alphabetically sorted by document title, and duplicate entries were identified and removed. A total of 2409 duplicates were eliminated, resulting in a final dataset of 35,146 records.
Table 2, presents the number of records removed for each country.
2.3. Data Processing and Cleaning
The datasets retrieved from the seven independent country-specific queries were downloaded in CSV format from Scopus and merged into a single consolidated file. An additional variable was created to label the country of affiliation for each record, ensuring traceability across the dataset. Since the queries were executed separately, publications co-authored across multiple Central American countries appeared in more than one national dataset. These duplicate entries—identified by article title—were removed, resulting in a non-redundant dataset of 35,146 unique records (out of 37,555 initially retrieved).
The cleaned dataset was used to calculate annual publication trends across the study period (1996–2023). In parallel, additional bibliometric indicators were extracted directly from Scopus’s Analyze search results function. Country-level output was obtained from the independent queries, while institutional productivity and author-level contributions were derived through the built-in analysis tool. Further indicators—including subject-area distribution, patterns of collaboration, language of publication, and journal sources—were also obtained through this function.
This twofold strategy ensured methodological consistency by combining manual data cleaning with standardized bibliometric outputs generated by Scopus.
2.4. Bibliometric Indicators
The following indicators were applied:
- −
Scientific production: Total number of documents published per country, year, institution, and author.
Complementary indicators—such as subject-area distribution, patterns of collaboration (institutional, national, and international), language of publication, and journal sources—were obtained directly from Scopus’s Analyze search results tool. Institutional productivity and author-level contributions were also retrieved through the same function. This approach ensured methodological transparency by clearly distinguishing indicators derived from the processed dataset from those obtained via standardized Scopus metrics.
2.5. Visualization Tools
Scientific collaboration was analyzed using filters and sorting functions in Microsoft Excel applied to the exported Scopus dataset. The thematic areas were identified directly through the subject area filters available on the Scopus web platform. Collaboration analysis was based exclusively on the co-authorship data directly provided by Scopus. Additional network mapping or visualization software was applied (VOSviewer V1.6.20).
4. Conclusions
This study represents the first comprehensive and comparative bibliometric mapping of scientific production in the seven Central American countries—Belize, Guatemala, Honduras, El Salvador, Nicaragua, Costa Rica, and Panama—over a 27-year period (1996–2023), based on publications indexed in Scopus. The analysis has revealed not only the chronological evolution of research productivity but also patterns of collaboration, dominant thematic areas, institutional distribution, and the international visibility of knowledge produced in the region.
The results indicate a general upward trend in scientific production, with an average annual growth of 7%. This sustained increase contrasts, however, with profound asymmetry among countries: Costa Rica, Panama, and Guatemala account for more than 80% of total publications, while Honduras, El Salvador, Nicaragua, and especially Belize exhibit significantly lower levels. This polarization does not reflect a deficit in intellectual or research capacity but rather structural disparities, including unequal access to R&D funding, inconsistent national policies, deficits in scientific infrastructure, and weak institutionalization of research systems.
The COVID-19 pandemic marked a turning point, evidenced by a peak in publications during 2020 and 2021. While this increase was global, its intensity in Central America reflects the adaptive capacity of certain academic hubs during global emergencies. However, the slight subsequent decline suggests that this momentum was not entirely sustained by long-term structural policies.
From a thematic perspective, the most prolific fields—Medical, Environmental, Biological, and Agricultural Sciences—reflect a direct connection to the region’s structural challenges: infectious diseases, food security, environmental management, and biodiversity. However, emerging and transformative fields such as Decision Sciences, Data Science, Computing, and Materials Science remain underrepresented. This thematic concentration suggests a limited diversification of the regional scientific ecosystem, potentially influenced by traditionally oriented research agendas, limited university-industry interaction, and underfunding in technological sectors.
Beyond economic size and population, the scale of the research workforce and the level of investment in R&D are critical structural factors explaining the uneven scientific output across Central America. Countries such as Costa Rica and Panama, with higher densities of researchers and relatively greater R&D expenditure, consistently achieve stronger normalized publication indicators. In contrast, Guatemala, Honduras, and El Salvador show structural disadvantages due to their limited research personnel and investment levels, which constrain their capacity to generate scientific knowledge. These disparities highlight that differences in scientific productivity are not only a matter of resources but also of institutional and policy commitments to strengthening national research systems.
One of the study’s most compelling findings is the extremely high level of international collaboration. Over 80% of articles are co-authored with researchers from the United States, Spain, Mexico, the United Kingdom, and Germany. This openness has been crucial for increasing the visibility and citation impact of Central American science but also reveals a pronounced dependency on external networks. Such dependency may limit regional scientific autonomy and pose risks if not counterbalanced by policies that strengthen internal research capacities.
In contrast, collaboration among countries within the region remains marginal, despite shared challenges. The low intensity of intra-regional networks represents a missed opportunity for Central American scientific integration. Strengthening South–South collaboration could have a positive impact on the resilience of regional scientific ecosystems and the exchange of contextually relevant knowledge.
At the institutional level, universities remain the main engine of scientific production, though with significant disparities. The University of Costa Rica leads in both volume and visibility, followed by Panamanian and Guatemalan universities. The concentration of highly cited researchers in a few institutions underscores the need for policies that promote institutional equity, support doctoral programs, and foster sustainable scientific careers. Individual metrics, such as the h-index, have proven useful not only for measuring impact but also for guiding funding strategies and collaborative partnerships.
Journal selection also plays a key role. While English-language open-access journals such as PLOS One and Scientific Reports dominate, the Revista de Biología Tropical—a Costa Rican journal—remains the leading regional publication outlet. This demonstrates that high-quality local journals can achieve international influence when backed by consistency, visibility, and global collaboration.
The dominance of the English language in academic publishing poses both opportunities and challenges for Spanish-speaking researchers. Training in scientific writing in English and inclusive language policies must be considered as integral components of any strategy aimed at strengthening regional research capacities. Language barriers may also contribute to the low international visibility of many relevant works produced in Spanish.
From a critical standpoint, the findings support the assertion that the scientific underperformance of several countries in the region is not due to a lack of talent but rather to the absence of enabling environments. Comparative experience shows that countries with consistent science and technology policies—such as Costa Rica and Panama—have built more robust and visible scientific systems. This validates hypotheses put forward by previous studies (
Powell & Dusdal, 2017;
Romakh, 2021;
Yakhontova, 2020) regarding the correlation between national policies, investment, and academic performance.
Central America stands at a crucial juncture in its scientific trajectory. While significant progress has been made in terms of research output and global integration, internal disparities, institutional fragility, and thematic limitations must be addressed to achieve a more autonomous, balanced, and contextually relevant scientific development.
Theoretically, this study contributes to the field of comparative science studies by offering an exhaustive cartography of science in a region historically underrepresented in bibliometric literature. It provides an interpretive framework for understanding the dynamics of production, collaboration, and visibility in contexts of low R&D investment and may serve as a basis for comparative studies with other regions of the Global South.
Practically, the findings offer actionable insights for policymakers, higher education institutions, and international cooperation agencies. The evidence presented can be used to achieve the following:
- −
Redesign national science and technology policies based on empirical data.
- −
Prioritize strategic funding toward underrepresented thematic areas.
- −
Incentivize scientific production in emerging institutions.
- −
Strengthen regional networks and reduce reliance on unilateral collaborations.
- −
Support training programs in scientific writing and academic English.
Future Research Directions:
- −
Development of a common Central American science policy framework that fosters integration, thematic diversification, and institutional strengthening.
- −
Longitudinal studies on the most successful research careers and institutional trajectories in the region.
- −
Qualitative assessment of researchers’ perceptions of structural and linguistic barriers.
- −
Evaluation of the impact of international cooperation on local scientific capacity development.
- −
Continued monitoring of bibliometric trends with updated datasets and comparative analyses across Latin American subregions.
- −
Future research could expand on this study by integrating bibliometric indicators with national statistics on research and development (R&D) funding. Such an approach would allow for a comparative analysis of how financial investment relates to scientific output in each Central American country, providing a more comprehensive understanding of national research performance and efficiency.