Next Article in Journal
Regeneration of the Periodontal Apparatus in Aggressive Periodontitis Patients
Previous Article in Journal
Three-Dimensional Assessment of Morphological Changes Following Nasoalveolar Molding Therapy in Cleft Lip and Palate Patients: A Case Report
Previous Article in Special Issue
Phosphophoryn and Dentin Sialoprotein Effects on Dental Pulp Cell Migration, Proliferation, and Differentiation
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessReview

Atraumatic Restorative Treatment and Interim Therapeutic Restoration: A Review of the Literature

1
Pediatric Dentistry Department, Faculty of Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University, 21589 Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
2
Pediatric Dentistry Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, 21526 Alexandria, Egypt
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Dent. J. 2019, 7(1), 28; https://doi.org/10.3390/dj7010028
Received: 13 November 2018 / Revised: 30 January 2019 / Accepted: 26 February 2019 / Published: 7 March 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Restorative and Esthetic Dentistry)
  |  
PDF [223 KB, uploaded 7 March 2019]

Abstract

This review discusses the techniques and uses of atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) and interim therapeutic restoration (ITR) and states the differences between these two approaches. ART and ITR are similar approaches and are performed using the same material, but they differ in the purpose of their use. ART is used in cases when there are obstacles to reaching dental care units and has been proven to have high success rates in primary and permanent dentitions. ITR is used as a temporary restoration that will be replaced with a more definitive one. ITR is used in cases when the ideal dental treatment cannot be performed. Conventional glass polyalkenoate (ionomer) restorative cement (GIC) is the material of choice that has been used for ART and ITR. This is because of its fluoride release properties, including its ability to bond to enamel and dentine, its pulpal biocompatibility, and its ease of manipulation. High-viscosity glass ionomer performed better than low and medium-viscosity glass ionomer in ART. Combining GIC with conditioner, as well as the use of a chemo-mechanical approach, improved the success rate of ART. Both ATR and ITR are acceptable strategies, with success rates comparable to the traditional treatment methods. View Full-Text
Keywords: atraumatic restorative treatment; interim therapeutic restoration; glass ionomer cement; high-viscosity glass ionomer atraumatic restorative treatment; interim therapeutic restoration; glass ionomer cement; high-viscosity glass ionomer
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).
SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Saber, A.M.; El-Housseiny, A.A.; Alamoudi, N.M. Atraumatic Restorative Treatment and Interim Therapeutic Restoration: A Review of the Literature. Dent. J. 2019, 7, 28.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Dent. J. EISSN 2304-6767 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top