Next Article in Journal
Correlation between Implant Geometry, Bone Density, and the Insertion Torque/Depth Integral: A Study on Bovine Ribs
Next Article in Special Issue
Evaluation of Self-Help Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for Children’s Dental Anxiety in General Dental Practice
Previous Article in Journal / Special Issue
Psychosocial Impacts Relating to Dental Injuries in Childhood: The Bigger Picture
Open AccessArticle

The Malocclusion Impact Questionnaire (MIQ): Cross-Sectional Validation in a Group of Young People Seeking Orthodontic Treatment in New Zealand

1
Academic Unit of Oral Health, Dentistry and Society, School of Clinical Dentistry, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TA, UK
2
Department of Oral Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Otago, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Dent. J. 2019, 7(1), 24; https://doi.org/10.3390/dj7010024
Received: 21 November 2018 / Revised: 12 February 2019 / Accepted: 13 February 2019 / Published: 4 March 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Psychosocial Impacts of Dental Conditions in Childhood)
The aim of the study was to test the validity of the Malocclusion Impact Questionnaire (MIQ) in a NZ sample and to evaluate possible cross-cultural differences in MIQ data between a NZ and a UK sample. A cross-sectional, non-random sample of young people, aged 10–16 years, attending their first appointment at the orthodontic clinic of New Zealand’s National Centre for Dentistry were asked to complete a questionnaire. This consisted of the 17 item MIQ, the short form CPQ11-14-ISF16 and two global questions. Some basic demographic and clinical data were collected. Sixty-six participants completed the questionnaire; however, the data for 2 were excluded due to the number of incomplete responses. MIQ was found to have excellent internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha 0.924), good construct validity (Spearman’s rho, 0.661 global Q1 ‘Overall, how much do your teeth bother you?’; 0.583 global Q2 ‘Overall, how much do your teeth affect your life?’). MIQ also demonstrated good criterion validity with CPQ11-14-ISF16 (Pearson rho, 0.625). The Rasch analysis confirmed that the questionnaire performed similarly and there was no differential item functioning between the two populations. The main differences between the samples were that the young people in NZ were less concerned about their malocclusion and reported lower item-impact scores compared with the young people in the UK. View Full-Text
Keywords: orthodontics; malocclusion; quality of life orthodontics; malocclusion; quality of life
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Benson, P.E.; Gilchrist, F.; Farella, M. The Malocclusion Impact Questionnaire (MIQ): Cross-Sectional Validation in a Group of Young People Seeking Orthodontic Treatment in New Zealand. Dent. J. 2019, 7, 24. https://doi.org/10.3390/dj7010024

AMA Style

Benson PE, Gilchrist F, Farella M. The Malocclusion Impact Questionnaire (MIQ): Cross-Sectional Validation in a Group of Young People Seeking Orthodontic Treatment in New Zealand. Dentistry Journal. 2019; 7(1):24. https://doi.org/10.3390/dj7010024

Chicago/Turabian Style

Benson, Philip E.; Gilchrist, Fiona; Farella, Mauro. 2019. "The Malocclusion Impact Questionnaire (MIQ): Cross-Sectional Validation in a Group of Young People Seeking Orthodontic Treatment in New Zealand" Dent. J. 7, no. 1: 24. https://doi.org/10.3390/dj7010024

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop