Next Article in Journal
Diabetes Mellitus and Its Association to the Occurrence of Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw
Next Article in Special Issue
Immediate Implants: Clinical Guidelines for Esthetic Outcomes
Previous Article in Journal / Special Issue
A Simplified Technique for Implant-Abutment Level Impression after Soft Tissue Adaptation around Provisional Restoration
Review

The Overall Survival, Complication-Free Survival, and Related Complications of Combined Tooth-Implant Fixed Partial Dentures: A Literature Review

1
Regional Dental Clinic, Swieqi Road, Swieqi SWQ3410, Malta
2
School of Oral and Dental Sciences, Bristol Dental Hospital, Lower Maudlin Street, Bristol BS1 2LY, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Bernhard Pommer
Dent. J. 2016, 4(2), 15; https://doi.org/10.3390/dj4020015
Received: 21 March 2016 / Revised: 5 April 2016 / Accepted: 4 May 2016 / Published: 25 May 2016
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Implant Dentistry)
This paper reviews the literature regarding possible complications, complication-free survival, and overall survival of fixed dental prostheses that use both implants and natural teeth as abutments. The paper also provides clinical guidelines for treatment based on this literature review. An electronic search utilizing the MEDLINE, BIOSIS Citation Index, and Web of Science™ Core Collection databases was undertaken, and a review of the 25 selected texts studying 22 different patient cohorts was carried out. From a total of 1610 implants reviewed, 40 were lost (33 due to loss of integration and 7 due to fracture), whereas, out of a total of 1301 teeth, 38 were lost, of which 16 were due to fracture. Seventy-three cases of tooth intrusion were detected. From a total of 676 frameworks reviewed (metal n = 645, Zirconia n = 31), 7 fractured, while veneer material fracture occurred in 70 out of 672 bridges. Overall, 502 out of 531 tooth-implant fixed prostheses (TIPFs) remained functional, and 336 out of 439 prostheses showed no technical or biological complications and remained functional. Rigid TIFPs permanently cemented to teeth with sufficient coronal structure and with limited use of prosthetic attachments offer a good long-term treatment option to patients with good oral hygiene following sound implant placement. This mode of treatment should be used when free-standing implant-supported options may not be possible. Larger randomized control studies and other clinical studies comparing tooth-to-implant-connected treatment with other forms of treatment are needed to better understand the place of TIFP treatment in oral rehabilitation. View Full-Text
Keywords: implant; survival; complications; fixed partial dentures implant; survival; complications; fixed partial dentures
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Borg, P.; Puryer, J.; McNally, L.; O’Sullivan, D. The Overall Survival, Complication-Free Survival, and Related Complications of Combined Tooth-Implant Fixed Partial Dentures: A Literature Review. Dent. J. 2016, 4, 15. https://doi.org/10.3390/dj4020015

AMA Style

Borg P, Puryer J, McNally L, O’Sullivan D. The Overall Survival, Complication-Free Survival, and Related Complications of Combined Tooth-Implant Fixed Partial Dentures: A Literature Review. Dentistry Journal. 2016; 4(2):15. https://doi.org/10.3390/dj4020015

Chicago/Turabian Style

Borg, Peter, James Puryer, Lisa McNally, and Dominic O’Sullivan. 2016. "The Overall Survival, Complication-Free Survival, and Related Complications of Combined Tooth-Implant Fixed Partial Dentures: A Literature Review" Dentistry Journal 4, no. 2: 15. https://doi.org/10.3390/dj4020015

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop