Next Article in Journal
Effect of Common Staining Beverages on the Color Stability of Additively and Subtractively Manufactured Provisional Materials
Previous Article in Journal
C-Reactive Protein-to-Platelet Inflammatory Index (CPII) and Symptom Severity Score for Early Differentiation of Odontogenic Cervicofacial Necrotizing Fasciitis from Odontogenic Abscesses: A Retrospective Cohort Study
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Subcutaneous Emphysema Following Periodontal Interventions: A Comprehensive Literature Review and Clinical Considerations

by
Ayse Gokce Sahin
* and
Mazlum Bulent Kurtis
Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Gazi University, 06490 Ankara, Turkey
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Dent. J. 2026, 14(3), 163; https://doi.org/10.3390/dj14030163
Submission received: 5 January 2026 / Revised: 2 March 2026 / Accepted: 6 March 2026 / Published: 11 March 2026
(This article belongs to the Section Oral Hygiene, Periodontology and Peri-implant Diseases)

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Subcutaneous emphysema is a rare but potentially life-threatening complication of dental procedures caused by the penetration of pressurized air into submucosal tissues and its spread through cervicofacial and mediastinal spaces. This review aimed to summarize all reported cases of subcutaneous emphysema following periodontal interventions and to identify procedure and device-related etiologic factors associated with its occurrence. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted, and case reports published between 1957 and 2025 were included without language restrictions. Cases related to trauma, maxillofacial surgery, endodontic, restorative, or prosthetic procedures were excluded. Results: A total of 34 publications reporting 36 clinical casesmet the inclusion criteria. The median patient age was 48 years (range: 8–76), and 66.7% of cases occurred in female patients. Air-powder abrasive devices were the most frequently implicated etiologic factor (66.7%), followed by dental lasers (11.1%) and air-water syringes (8.3%). Mediastinal spread was reported in 41.7% of cases. Most patients received prophylactic antibiotic therapy, and the median resolution time was 5 days (range: 3–14). Conclusions: Subcutaneous emphysema following periodontal interventions is most frequently reported in association with the use of pressurized air-driven devices, particularly air-powder abrasive systems. Although the clinical course described in the included cases was generally benign, the observed patterns highlight the relevance of procedural and device-related factors in the development and extent of this complication.
Keywords: subcutaneous emphysema; air-abrasive devices; periodontal therapy; pneumomediastinum; patient safety subcutaneous emphysema; air-abrasive devices; periodontal therapy; pneumomediastinum; patient safety
Graphical Abstract

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sahin, A.G.; Kurtis, M.B. Subcutaneous Emphysema Following Periodontal Interventions: A Comprehensive Literature Review and Clinical Considerations. Dent. J. 2026, 14, 163. https://doi.org/10.3390/dj14030163

AMA Style

Sahin AG, Kurtis MB. Subcutaneous Emphysema Following Periodontal Interventions: A Comprehensive Literature Review and Clinical Considerations. Dentistry Journal. 2026; 14(3):163. https://doi.org/10.3390/dj14030163

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sahin, Ayse Gokce, and Mazlum Bulent Kurtis. 2026. "Subcutaneous Emphysema Following Periodontal Interventions: A Comprehensive Literature Review and Clinical Considerations" Dentistry Journal 14, no. 3: 163. https://doi.org/10.3390/dj14030163

APA Style

Sahin, A. G., & Kurtis, M. B. (2026). Subcutaneous Emphysema Following Periodontal Interventions: A Comprehensive Literature Review and Clinical Considerations. Dentistry Journal, 14(3), 163. https://doi.org/10.3390/dj14030163

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop