Next Article in Journal
In Vivo Assessment of the Calcium Salt-Forming Ability of a New Calcium Silicate-Based Intracanal Medicament: Bio-C Temp
Previous Article in Journal
In Vitro Evaluation of Tooth-Whitening Potential of Peroxide-Free OTC Dental Bleaching Agents
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Dentistry Journal
Volume 11
Issue 4
10.3390/dj11040090
dentistry-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Assessing the Antifungal Activity of a Soft Denture Liner Loaded with Titanium Oxide Nanoparticles (TiO2 NPs)

by
Amal Qasim Ahmed
1,*,
Sattar Jabbar Abdul-Zahra Al-Hmedat
2,
Dunya Malhan Hanweet
3 and
Julfikar Haider
4,*
1
Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Kufa, Najaf 54001, Iraq
2
Department of Conservative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Kufa, Najaf 54001, Iraq
3
Department of Oral Pathology, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Kufa, Najaf 54001, Iraq
4
Department of Engineering, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester M1 5GD, UK
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Dent. J. 2023, 11(4), 90; https://doi.org/10.3390/dj11040090
Submission received: 5 February 2023 / Revised: 28 February 2023 / Accepted: 24 March 2023 / Published: 29 March 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Dental Materials)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Aim: Soft denture lining materials are susceptible to be colonized by different microorganisms, especially by Candida albicans (C. albicans), causing denture-induced stomatitis. This study was designed to evaluate the effectiveness of incorporating titanium dioxide nanoparticles (TiO2 NPs) into a soft denture liner towards reducing microbial activity. Method: A total of 40 PEMA-TiO2 nanocomposites samples were fabricated by adding 0.0 wt.% (control), 1.0 wt.%, 1.5 wt.%, and 2 wt.% TiO2 NPs to a heat cured soft denture lining material (polyethyl methacrylate, PEMA). The prepared samples were divided into four groups (n = 10) according to the content of TiO2 NPs. The uniformity of TiO2 NPS distribution within the denture liner matrix was assessed using a Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM). The viable count of C. albicans was evaluated to test the antifungal resistance of the developed composite. Results: The SEM images showed fairly homogeneous dispersion, with patches of TiO2 NPs agglomeration within the PEMA matrix and an increasing concentration of NPs with higher NP content. The particle map and EDX analysis confirmed the evidence of the TiO2 NPs. The mean viable count results for the control (0.0 wt.%) and 1.0 wt.%, 1.5 wt.%, and 2 wt.% TiO2 groups were 139.80, 12.00, 6.20, and 1.00, respectively, with a significant difference from the control group (p < 0.05). The antifungal activity also increased with the increase in the concentration of TiO2 NPs. Conclusions: The addition of TiO2 NPs into a heat-cured soft denture liner provided antifungal activity as evidenced by the reduced colonization of C. albicans. The antimicrobial activity of the liner material increased with the increased concentration of TiO2 NPS.

1. Introduction

When a removable denture base has good adaptation to the underlying oral supporting tissues, the denture’s fitting, stability, retention, and occlusion, as well as the patient’s appearance, are improved. However, over time, these underlying supporting tissues resorb, leading to instabilities in adaptation and in the patient’s appearance and comfort [1]. Poorly fitted dentures can adversely affect the underlying thin oral mucosa, forcing some patients to be unable to wear the unstable and hard removable dentures, which can cause irritation to the fragile and thin mucosa [2,3]. In order to readapt the denture base to its supporting tissue, denture relining should be utilized. The application of a soft liner material to the surface of the denture can reduce tissue irritation due to its resiliency and thus the patients would have a more comfortable denture wearing experience, without any pain [4,5].
The liners absorb and redistribute the applied forces of mastication by providing a layer of cushion, and thus the irritated and inflamed fragile oral tissues can restore their integrity and health, enhancing patient’s masticatory ability, chewing efficiency, and biting forces by improving the removable denture’s fitting and retention [5,6]. Despite the advantages found by relieving the oral irritated mucosa, the soft liners possess many shortcomings, which can be identified clinically when patients wear their relined dentures [7].
The most important issue is the invasion of such materials by different pathological microorganisms (predominantly C. albicans fungi), which colonize, attach, and disrupt the material integrity, causing oral mucosal infections called denture stomatitis. This makes denture wearing a more painful and challenging for the patients [8]. Denture stomatitis is a frequent pathological condition with redness and a burning sensation of underlying denture supporting mucosa (with both complete and partial dentures), and this more common in maxillary ridges than in mandibular ridges [4,9]. The term Candida comes from the Latin word candid, which literally means white. In general, Candida is a Gram positive fungus, with an oval or round shaped cell with a thin wall and very small diameter ranging from 3 to 30 μm. Candida have many different species, but the most predominant one is C. albicans, which represent more than 80% of the species isolated from the oral cavity [10,11].
The denture base, with its soft liner, should be cleansed thoroughly to avoid such colonization by C. albicans, and hence denture-related stomatitis. Many chemical and mechanical methods are used to disinfect the denture from the attached fungi, but excessive use of these disinfectants will adversely affect the serviceability of both materials [12]. However, using of these conventional cleansing methods might be compromised in some handicapped, geriatric, and hospitalized patients because of their difficulties with movement, loss of memory, and perceptive impairment [13].
Many research studies had been conducted and are still continuing in order to obtain a suitable solution for the problem of C. albicans colonization. Al-Shammari et al. demonstrated that zein NPs could be a potential candidate as an antifungal agent, and their effectiveness can be expanded by loading them with transitional metal ions such as copper or chromium. Silver nanoparticles have also been shown as a potent inhibitors of C. albicans biofilm formation [14,15]. One research direction focused on adding antifungal agents within the soft liner material [16]. According to previous studies, TiO2 NPs are considered to be one of the most effective antifungal agents. Its antifungal or antimicrobial property is related to its crystal structure, shape, and size [17]. TiO2 NPs also exhibit eco-friendly biocidal properties, which are attributed to their strong oxidizing potential. It has been used against a wide range of infectious microbes, including various bacterial strains, endospores, fungi, algae, protozoa, viruses, microbial toxins, and prions [18]. TiO2 NPs are used for treating skin infections and by reducing the size of the nanoparticles, its antimicrobial activity can be increased [12,19]. In dentistry, the addition of TiO2 NPs is preferred because of their, excellent biocompatibility, low cost, high refractive index, white color, and corrosion resistance, as well as their chemically inactive, nontoxic, and excellent mechanical properties. Titanium is considered one of the fourth most available metals on Earth, following aluminum, iron, and magnesium [20,21,22].
Although TiO2 NPs have been found to be effective in dental applications as an antimicrobial agent in denture base materials, the antifungal efficacy of TiO2 NPs when added to a soft denture liner, such as being heat cured polyethyl methacrylate (PEMA), is lacking. Furthermore, the response of TiO2 NPs to Candida albicans for this kind of application has not yet been explored. Therefore, the current study will bring a novel understanding for assessing the efficacy of TiO2 NPs into the PEMA soft denture liner. The null hypotheses were as follows:
  • The addition TiO2 NPs in the PEMA denture liner would not make any difference in the viable count of C. albicans.
  • With increasing the concentration of TiO2 NPs in PEMA, the viable count of C. albicans would not be affected.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

The materials used in this study for sample preparation and conducting antifungal tests are presented in Table 1.

2.2. Fabrication of Soft Liner Samples

2.2.1. Mold Preparation

Plastic patterns with a 10 mm × 10 mm square cross section and 2.3 mm thickness (Figure 1A) [23] were used to prepare the specimens, which were first placed in the silicone duplicating material and then allowed the silicone to be set. The silicone mold with its impeded plastic patterns was placed in a dental stone mixture that was prepared following the manufacturer’s instructions with a water to powder ratio of 25 mL/100 g, which was then poured in the lower part of a metal dental flask (Figure 1B).
After setting of poured stone in the lower part, a coating of a separating medium was applied to the stone and plastic patterns. The two halves of the flask were assembled by placing the upper part on the lower part and then loaded with dental stone again and allowed extra time for complete stone setting. The flask was opened, and the plastic patterns were taken out from the duplicating silicone, leaving their places in it, which acted as a mold (Figure 1C).

2.2.2. Preparing Heat Cure PEMA Soft Liner

As stated in the manufacturer’s instructions, the P/L (soft liner powder/liquid monomer) ratio for each 1 mL of liquid monomer to 1.2 g of powder was considered. In a dry small and clean glass bowel, the liquid was mixed with the powder and left until it reached the stage in which it could be used (dough stage). The insulating material was placed on both halves of the flask and left to dry in order to apply the mixed acrylic- based soft liner.

2.2.3. Incorporation of Titanium Nanoparticles

In three different concentrations (1%, 1.5%, and 2% by weight), TiO2 NPs were added into the liner monomer for making the experimental specimens. The concentrations were selected based on a pilot study and values reported in the literature. The mixture was scattered for 3 min to disperse in into separate nanocrystals by utilizing probe sonication apparatus at 120 W and 60 KHz. The bowel containing suspension of the monomer and TiO2 NPs was placed in an ice-water bath to cool by eliminating the generated heat of sonication, which might lead to changes in the suspension volume or cause degradation.
The formed monomer suspension with TiO2 NPs was immediately added and mixed with the PEMA powder to avoid any particle agglomeration. The proportioning and mixing of the loaded soft liner with these nanoparticles were carried out in the same way as previously mentioned for the control specimens. In order to maintain a precise P/L ratio, the weight of the TiO2 NPs powder was subtracted from the weight of the PEMA powder.
When the soft liner reached the dough stage, it was packed into the mold and the curing process was accomplished in a thermostatically controlled water bath in two steps, as suggested by the manufacturer. In the first step, the flask containing the samples was heated up to a temperature of 70 °C and maintained the temperature for 90 min, while in the second step, the temperature was raised up to 100 °C and maintained for 30 min. Again, the cooling process of the flask was conducted at room temperature for 30 min, followed by complete cooling with tap water for 15 min before deflasking. The specimens were taken out from the flask (Figure 2) and a sharp blade was used to remove any excessive material attached to the samples, and fine grit silicon polishing bur (Vertex) and fine grit sand paper were employed to further remove any sample flash. Finally, sterilization of the specimens was conducted in an autoclave.

2.3. Isolation of Candida albicans

C. albicans were isolated from the oral cavities of 25 patients who attended the clinic of oral medicine of dentistry College, University of Kufa, Iraq, with a complaint of denture stomatitis with oral thrush. The process of isolation was conducted using a sterile cotton swab, which was gently scrubbed over the lesional site. Sabouraud dextrose agar (SDA) was used as the primary isolation medium for the subsequent inoculation [24]. The collected swabs were cultured and incubated aerobically at 37 °C for 1–2 days followed by preservation at 4 °C for later investigation.

2.4. Identification of Candida albicans

The samples taken from the oral cavity have more than one species of candida; hence, it is important to differentiate between the different species. Several methods were used to identify and confirm that the collected fungi were C. albicans.

2.4.1. Colony Morphology and Microscopical Observation

When a suitable medium and conditions were provided for the growth of C. albicans fungi, clear, convex, creamy and smooth colonies formed on the SDA medium (Figure 3A).
By staining with Gram’s stain method, the most commonly used differential staining technique to differentiate between Gram-positive or Gram-negative microorganisms, C. albicans can be defined microscopically. First, from one isolated colony of candida, a little amount was mixed with a drop of normal saline on a glass slide, the formed suspension was distributed on this slide and was left to dry completely, and it was fixed by passing it over the flame of a Bunsen burner to be ready for staining with the basic dyes and materials of this method (crystal violet, gram’ iodine, acetone–ethanol, and safranin) [25]. Finally, the glass slide was examined under a light microscope to see the stained candida (Figure 3B).
Sabouraud dextrose broth was made ready based on the instructions provided by the manufacturer. First, 30 g of SDB powder was dissolved in one liter distilled water and sterilized in an autoclave at 121 °C and 103.42 kPa for 15 min. A controlled cooling procedure was followed to bring down the culture media temperature to 47 °C. It should be noted that to each 1 L of medium, 0.05 g of chloramphenicol antibiotic was added to avoid any bacterial growth.

2.4.2. Germ Tube Formation

A tiny amount of fungal cells were collected from an isolated colony suspended in 0.5 mL of serum, and the tube was incubated at 35–37 °C for up to three hours. Under a low magnification, a glass slide containing a drop of fungi–serum suspension was investigated for the formation of germ tubes, as shown in Figure 4.

2.4.3. Biochemical Identification

For the identification of the isolated fungus as C. albicans, the analytical profile index (API) Candida system (bioMérieux) was utilized. This system was composed of 10 various biochemical tests, which included dehydrated substrates in order to decide the usage profiles of the yeasts. The manufacturer’s instructions were followed to complete the identification procedure. A suspension made using 1–2 colonies of the isolated C. albicans was added to API NaCl 0.85% with turbidity equal to 3McFarland standard value. The tubules were loaded with yeast suspension. The tubules were closed by API-Set oil because of some of the reactions were anaerobic. The API strip was incubated at 37 °C for 18–24 h and the results were collected as per the API-Candida table. Identification was made by using a profile register provided by the maker, indicated as a four digit number.

2.5. Assessing Antifungal Activity of PEMA-TiO2 Nanocomposites

For assessing the antifungal functionality of the PEMA-TiO2 nanocomposites, C. albicans was diluted in a 0.9% NaCl solution. A McFerland densitometer was employed to prepare a yeast suspension of approximately 107 colony forming units (CFU/mL) (0.5 McFarland standards).
In a tube with a volume of 9.9 mL of Sabouraud dextrose broth, each sample was placed into the tubes with 100 μL of the yeast suspension and they were dispensed and incubated for one day at a temperature of 37 °C. This ensured a final concentration of cells with 105 CFU/mL. The samples were gathered and washed five times following a standard method by immersing it in sterile deionized water to eliminate loosely joined cells. In Sabouraud dextrose agar plates, the viable cells attached to the sample surface were calculated [23,26] using Equation (1).
A F E = V c − V t V t × 100 %
where AFE is antifungal efficacy, and Vc and Vt are the number of viable fungal colonies in the control and experimental samples, respectively.

2.6. Characterization of Soft Liner Samples

Experimental and control samples were tested using a Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscope (IR Prestige-21Shimadzu, Japan) to figure out whether there was a chemical reaction between the soft denture lining material and TiO2 NPs. A Scanning Electron Microscope (S50. FEI, The Netherlands) equipped with an Energy Dispersive X-Ray spectroscope (EDX) was used to examine both the control (pure PEMA) and experimental (PEMA-TiO2) samples, and to identify the distribution TiO2 NPs within the PEMA matrix. The samples were sputter coated with a thin layer of gold to make them conductive.

2.7. Statistical Analysis

Viable count results were statistically analyzed by SPSS software (version 21). Descriptive statistics such as the mean, standard deviation (S.D.), standard error (S.E.), and different quartile values were extracted from the raw data. Furthermore, the data were subjected to one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by a least significant difference (LSD) test to identify statistical significance with p < 0.05.

3. Results

3.1. Nano-Composite Characteristics

Figure 5A presents the morphology of TiO2 NPs. The particles were spherical in shape, but formed clusters. The particle map and EDX analysis showed evidence of the TiO2 NPs. In the authors’ previous investigation, it was established by FTIR spectroscopy that a similar shape of absorption peaks was found for both the experimental and control samples, and this indicated no chemical reaction between TiO2 NPs and PEMA [27]. Furthermore, the SEM images presented in Figure 6 demonstrate that TiO2 NPs were fairly uniformly distributed with some areas of aggregation within the PEMA matrix. A higher number of particles appeared along with the increase of TiO2 NPs concentration in the PEMA.

3.2. Evaluating Viable Count of C. albicans (CFU/mL)

Table 2 and Figure 7 present the results associated with the mean viable count of C. albicans and other descriptive statistics. All of the experimental groups showed progressively lower mean values with the increasing concentration of TiO2 NPs, with the lowest mean value of 1.0 for the 2 wt.% group compared with the control group mean count of 139.8. With the increase in TiO2 NPs concentration, AFE increased. With just 1.0 wt.% TiO2 NPs the AFE was over 90%. After a further increase in the nanoparticles by 0.5 wt.%, AFE increased by approximately another 4% and finally at 2.0 wt.% AFE increased to nearly 100%, indicating that the nanocomposite denture liner would be highly effective against C. albicans.
A one-way ANOVA of the fungal viable count results from the different experiments indicated that the difference between the groups was highly significant (Table 3).
Further statistical comparison was made using the least significant difference (LSD) test, where the control group was significantly different from each of the experimental groups, as shown in Table 4. However, no statistical significance was observed between 1.0 wt.% and 1.5 wt.% or 1.5 wt.%, and 2.0 wt.%.
Figure 8 shows photographs of SDA plates showing the colony formation of C. albicans. The reduction in colonies were clearly visible with the increase in TiO2 NP concentration.

4. Discussion

In the next two decades, it is expected there will be an increase in the number of edentulous patients and thus a rising demand for wearing removable dentures. This would subsequently increase the need of using soft denture lining material to make the denture wearing a more comfortable experience for the patients [28,29,30].
Denture-related stomatitis caused by the colonization of C. albicans on the liners is considered to be one of the most significant problems. Therefore, the addition of nanoparticles such as TiO2 within the liner material itself might solve the problem to a greater extent, because this type of nanoparticle possesses a general antimicrobial activity and especially antifungal activity [17,31]. In this study, an attempt was made to develop a nanocomposite by adding TiO2 NPs to the PEMA soft denture liner for resisting any microbial growth, especially against C. albicans, which would help to avoid a sore mouth from dentures.
From the statistical analysis of the viable count results obtained in this study, a highly substantial reduction in the CFU/mL of the C. albicans was found with the addition of TiO2 NPs into the PEMA liner material, and the antifungal activity of PEMA was increased with the increased concentration of the TiO2 nano material. Even with 1.0 wt.% TiO2 addition, an almost 10-fold decrease in C. albicans colony formation was achieved. Therefore, both of the null hypotheses were rejected.
TiO2 NPs exhibit eco-friendly biocidal properties, which is attributed to their strong oxidation potential. It has been reported that an electromagnetic attraction exists between the negatively charged surface of the microbe and the positively charged metal oxide nanoparticles, and because of this affinity, the death of the microbe will occur from the toxicity released by the metal oxide nanoparticles [32,33,34]. Another possible explanation is that TiO2 NPs can destroy C. albicans cells through the production of intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS), which have undesirable effects inside the yeast cells with Coenzyme A oxidation and lipid peroxidation, leading to reduced adhesion and distorted ionic balance, causing deficient respiratory activity, which means inhibiting the respiratory cytosolic enzymes and modifying the macromolecule structures and eventual cell death [35]. In addition, cell destruction might happen because of the rupture in the cell membrane of C. albicans. TiO2 NPs can disturb C. albicans integrity causing loss of intracellular ions and other important substances. Furthermore, defecting the natural cell cycle at the pre-mitotic phase (G2/M) could lead to suppression of the budding process [18,36].
TiO2 NPs possess a large active surface area, which allowing for antifungal activity at a small dose of 1.0 wt.% so as to prevent C. albicans attaching, spreading, colonizing, and forming biofilms on the soft liners. Therefore, direct incorporation TiO2 NPs in the acrylic soft liner could create a sustainable antifungal effect. However, special attention should be given to the fact that the addition of nanoparticles must not significantly affect other physical, mechanical, optical, or aesthetic properties. In a previous study, it was found that adding 2.0 wt.% TiO2 NPs to PEMA soft liners resulted in a decrease in hardness, no change in shear bond strength, and an increase in the opacity of the liner material [27]. Similar results regarding the degradation of the mechanical and color properties of the PMMA denture base with the addition of TiO2 NPs were also reported [37,38,39]. It was found that the surface hardness of a nano-filler reinforced PMMA increased when the TiO2 NPs concentration was increased [37]. The authors attributed these findings to an improved chemical bonding between the PMMA matrix and the nano-fillers and a uniform distribution of the TiO2 NPs within the matrix facilitated by the coating of a silane coupling agent on the fillers.
No direct studies were found in the literature to compare the effect of TiO2 NPs on resisting fungal colonization in denture liners. However, studies have been reported on the antimicrobial resistance of NPs in PMMA denture base materials. For instance, this study was in agreement with Haghighi et al. [35], who investigated the antifungal activity of TiO2 NPs on the fungal biofilms that consisted of fluconazole resistant standard strains of C. albicans. Their study showed an enhanced antifungal activity of TiO2 NPs against the biofilms. Akhtar et al. (2016) [31] and Durairaj et al. (2015) [32] showed that TiO2 NPs had a super antifungal effect against Trichoderma reesei, Microsporum canis, Aspergillus niger, Penicillium sp, and Rhizopus. Totu et al. [40] reported that by incorporating only 0.4% TiO2 NPs in the PMMA polymer matrix with a stereolitographic technique could bring significant antibacterial effects to Candida species.
Waly [41] studied the influence of adding 5.0 wt.% pure titanium dioxide (TiO2) and silver-doped titanium dioxide (Ag-doped TiO2) nanoparticles in one soft acrylic liner material on the antifungal activity. It was concluded that by incorporating Ag-doped TiO2 NPs into the acrylic liner produced an antifungal activity against C. albicans when exposed to visible light. Although TiO2 NPs did not affect the viscoelastic properties of the soft liner but the Ag-doped TiO2 NPs displayed a reduced cushioning effect within the clinically acceptable range.
A clinical study was carried out to assess the efficacy of adding silicon dioxide (SiO2), zirconium oxide (ZrO2), and titanium oxide (TiO2) nanoparticles in a cold-cured Acrostone soft liner on C. albicans (CA) [42]. For each metal oxide nanoparticle, the concentrations were varied as 0.0 wt.%, 3.0%, and 7.0 wt.% in maxillary complete dentures, and swabs were collected from the relining sites after 14 and 28 days. The results suggested that CA adhesion increased with the increasing concentration of nanoparticles, and the antimicrobial resistance from highest to lowest order was as follows: TiO2 > ZrO2 > SiO2. However, 7.0 wt.% was recorded to provide the best efficacy in contrast with this study, where even 2.0 wt.% TiO2 NP showed the best antifungal activity. This could be due to the difference in the soft liner material. Another recent study identified a good inhibitory effect against the growth of C. albicans using ZrO2 NPs in a heat-cured acrylic-based soft lining material at concentrations of 1.5 and 2.0 wt.%. This could provide antifungal characteristics, reducing the chances of inducing denture-induced stomatitis. Furthermore, the shear bond strength also increased significantly with 2.0 wt.% ZrO2 NPs [43].
The antimicrobial efficacy of TiO2 could be credited to the hydrophilic nature and oxidative activity of TiO2. Upon adding TiO2 NPs to the denture liner, the same hydrophilic nature was transferred to the resulting nanocomposite, inhibiting the growth of microorganisms and preventing the formation of denture plaque [44,45]. Al Qahtani et al. introduced a new technique of denture base layering in order to incorporate TiO2 NPs in PMMA and to evaluate its effectiveness on C. albicans adhesion. Furthermore, surface roughness, hardness, translucency, and flexural strength characteristics were also quantified. The PMMA-TiO2 nanocomposites developed by the layering technique were shown to be effective in the reduction of C. albicans adhesion, while the surface and mechanical properties were unaffected [46]. Other than adding TiO2 NP as a filler in the denture base or denture liner acrylic, TiO2 was applied as a coating on the acrylic resin and its antimicrobial efficacy was assessed. It was found that the coating could effectively resist the growth of C. albicans. The major advantage of the coating is that it does not alter the mechanical properties of the acrylic material [47,48].
Although encouraging results on the antifungal resistance of PEMA-TiO2 nanocomposites were found in this study, further research needs to be carried out with other denture liner materials, such as cold cure, light cure, and silicone-based materials. Other mechanical (flexural or tear strength) and physical (color stability, sorption, and solubility) properties need to be assessed to ensure that the nanocomposite maintains its antifungal characteristics without compromising its durability. The results of this study cannot be directly applied to the clinical situation due to its in vitro nature. Most importantly, in vivo studies are required to demonstrate that the denture liner nanocomposite is effective for providing a long-term antifungal resistance.
Therefore, a low concentration of TiO2 NPs can be incorporated in the PEMA denture liner in every day clinical practice to enhance the antifungal activity in the oral cavity and to treat denture stomatitis with improved patient’s satisfaction.

5. Conclusions

Considering the shortcomings of this in vivo study, the key conclusions derived from this study are as follows.
(1)
Microstructural analyses demonstrated uniform dispersion of TiO2 NPs in the PEMA polymeric matrix.
(2)
Antifungal properties can be embedded within the soft denture lining material with the addition of TiO2 NPs into PEMA.
(3)
The antifungal efficacy was found to be concentration dependent, with an increased antifungal activity when there was an increase in the concentration of TiO2 NPs.
(4)
A concentration ranging from 1.0 to 2.0 wt.% TiO2 NPs in the PEMA denture liner could significantly reduce C. albicans colony formation in the oral environment compared with pure PEMA.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.Q.A., S.J.A.-Z.A.-H., and D.M.H.; methodology, A.Q.A.; validation, A.Q.A., S.J.A.-Z.A.-H., D.M.H., and J.H.; formal analysis, A.Q.A., D.M.H., and J.H.; investigation, A.Q.A. and D.M.H.; resources, S.J.A.-Z.A.-H. and D.M.H.; data curation, A.Q.A.; writing—original draft preparation, A.Q.A., S.J.A.-Z.A.-H., and D.M.H.; writing—review and editing, A.Q.A. and J.H.; visualization, A.Q.A. and J.H.; supervision, J.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available within the article.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the support from the University of Kufa for providing the experimental facility.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kranjčić, J.; Kostelić-Stunić, M.; Čelebić, A.; Komar, D.; Mehulić, K.; Vojvodić, D. Denture relining as an indicator of residual ridge resorption. Med. Glas. 2013, 10, 126–132. [Google Scholar]
  2. Imirzalioglu, P.; Karacaer, O.; Yilmaz, B.; Ozmen MSc, I. Color stability of denture acrylic resins and a soft lining material against tea, coffee, and nicotine. J. Prosthodont. 2010, 19, 118–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Mahajan, N.; Datta, K. Comparison of bond strength of auto polymerizing, heat cure soft denture liners with denture base resin—An In Vitro study. J. Indian Prosthodont. Soc. 2010, 10, 31–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Bulad, K.; Taylor, R.L.; Verran, J.; McCord, J.F. Colonization and penetration of denture soft lining materials by Candida albicans. Dent. Mater. 2004, 20, 167–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ergun, G.; Nagas, I.C. Color stability of silicone or acrylic denture liners: An in vitro investigation. Eur. J. Dent. 2007, 1, 144–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Rao, C.S.; Reddy, S.S.; Prasad, G.M.; Reddy, K.S.; Rao, N.V.; Naik, M.S. A study to evaluate and compare the shear bond strength of resilient liners with heat cure denture base resins, with and without the effect of saliva: An in vitro study. J. Contemp. Dent. Pract. 2012, 13, 394–400. [Google Scholar]
  7. Pavan, S.; Arioli Filho, J.N.; Dos Santos, P.H.; Nogueira, S.S.; Batista, A.U.D. Effect of disinfection treatments on the hardness of soft denture liner materials. J. Prosthodont. 2007, 16, 101–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Chladek, G.; Kasperski, J.; Barszczewska-Rybarek, I.; Żmudzki, J. Sorption, solubility, bond strength and hardness of denture soft lining incorporated with silver nanoparticles. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2013, 14, 563–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Krishnamurthy, S.; Hallikerimath, R.B. An in-vitro evaluation of retention, colonization and penetration of commonly used denture lining materials by candida albicans. J. Clin. Diagn. Res. JCDR 2016, 10, ZC84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Coronado-Castellote, L.; Jiménez-Soriano, Y. Clinical and microbiological diagnosis of oral candidiasis. J. Clin. Exp. Dent. 2013, 5, e279–e286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Byadarahally Raju, S.; Rajappa, S. Isolation and identification of Candida from the oral cavity. ISRN Dent. 2011, 2011, 487921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Nazirkar, G.; Bhanushali, S.; Singh, S.; Pattanaik, B.; Raj, N. Effect of anatase titanium dioxide nanoparticles on the flexural strength of heat cured poly methyl methacrylate resins: An in-Vitro Study. J. Indian Prosthodont. Soc. 2014, 14, 144–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Nam, K.Y. In vitro antimicrobial effect of the tissue conditioner containing silver nanoparticles. J. Adv. Prosthodont. 2011, 3, 20–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Al-Shammari, R.S.S.; Jaberi, A.K.H.; Lungu, A.; Brebenel, I.; Al-Sudani, W.K.K.; Al-Saedi, J.H.M.; Pop, C.-E.; Mernea, M.; Stoian, G.; Mihailescu, D.F. The Antifungal Activity of Zein Nanoparticles Loaded With Transition Metal Ions. Rev. Roum. Chim. 2021, 66, 829–834. [Google Scholar]
  15. Lara, H.H.; Romero-Urbina, D.G.; Pierce, C.; Lopez-Ribot, J.L.; Arellano-Jiménez, M.J.; Jose-Yacaman, M. Effect of silver nanoparticles on Candida albicans biofilms: An ultrastructural study. J. Nanobiotechnology 2015, 13, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Iqbal, Z.; Zafar, M.S. Role of antifungal medicaments added to tissue conditioners: A systematic review. J. Prosthodont. Res. 2016, 60, 231–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Dizaj, S.M.; Lotfipour, F.; Barzegar-Jalali, M.; Zarrintan, M.H.; Adibkia, K. Antimicrobial activity of the metals and metal oxide nanoparticles. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2014, 44, 278–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Nadeem, M.; Tungmunnithum, D.; Hano, C.; Abbasi, B.H.; Hashmi, S.S.; Ahmad, W.; Zahir, A. The current trends in the green syntheses of titanium oxide nanoparticles and their applications. Green Chem. Lett. Rev. 2018, 11, 492–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. George, S.A.; Raj, M.S.; Solomon, D.; Roselin, P. Comparative study of the anti-fungal activity of zinc oxide and titanium dioxide nano and bulk particles with anti-fungals against fungi isolated from infected skin and dandruff flakes. Res. Rev. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2014, 3, 23–30. [Google Scholar]
  20. Ahmed, M.A.; El-Shennawy, M.; Althomali, Y.M.; Omar, A.A. Effect of titanium dioxide nano particles incorporation on mechanical and physical properties on two different types of acrylic resin denture base. World J. Nano Sci. Eng. 2016, 6, 111–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Elshereksi, N.W.; Ghazali, M.J.; Muchtar, A.; Azhari, C.H. Perspectives for titanium-derived fillers usage on denture base composite construction: A review article. Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2014, 2014, 746252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Sun, J.; Forster, A.M.; Johnson, P.M.; Eidelman, N.; Quinn, G.; Schumacher, G.; Zhang, X.; Wu, W.L. Improving performance of dental resins by adding titanium dioxide nanoparticles. Dent. Mater. 2011, 27, 972–982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Chladek, G.; Mertas, A.; Barszczewska-Rybarek, I.; Nalewajek, T.; Zmudzki, J.; Krol, W.; Lukaszczyk, J. Anti -fungal Activity of Soft Lining Material Modified by Silver Nanoparticles—A Pilot study. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2011, 12, 4735–4744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Axéll, T.; Simonsson, T.; Birkhed, D.; Rosenborg, J.; Edwardsson, S. Evaluation of a simplified diagnostic aid (Oricult-N) for detection of oral candidoses. Scand. J. Dent. Res. 1985, 93, 52–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Marler, L.M.; Siders, J.A.; Allen, S.D. Direct Smear Atlas: A Monograph of Gram-Stained Preparations of Clinical Specimens; Lippincott Williams & Wilkins: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  26. Monteiro, D.R.; Gorup, L.F.; Takamiya, A.S.; de Camargo, E.R.; Ruvolo Filho, A.C.; Barbosa, D.B. Silver Distribution and Release from an Antimicrobial Denture Base Resin Containing Silver Colloidal Nanoparticles. J. Prosthodont. 2011, 21, 7–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Ahmed, A.Q.; Ali, M.M.M. The influence of titanium dioxide nanoparticles incorporation into soft denture lining material on Candida albicans adherence and some mechanical and physical properties. J. Pure Appl. Microbiol. 2018, 12, 783–791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kimoto, S.; Kimoto, K.; Murakami, H.; Gunji, A.; Ito, N.; Kawai, Y. Survival analysis of mandibular complete dentures with acrylic-based resilient liners. Gerodontology 2013, 30, 187–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Mancuso, D.N.; Goiato, M.C.; Zuccolotti, B.C.R.; Moreno, A.; dos Santos, D.M.; Pesqueira, A.A. Effect of thermocycling on hardness, absorption, solubility and colour change of soft liners. Gerodontology 2012, 29, e215–e219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Akin, H.; Tugut, F.; Mutaf, B.; Akin, G.; Ozdemir, A.K. Effect of different surface treatments on tensile bond strength of silicone-based soft denture liner. Lasers Med. Sci. 2011, 26, 783–788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Akhtar, S.; Ali, I.; Tauseef, S.; Ahmed, F.; Shuja, A.; Sherwani, S.K. Synthesis, characterization and antibacterial activity of titanium dioxide (TiO2) nanoparticles. Fuuast J. Biol. 2016, 6, 141–147. [Google Scholar]
  32. Durairaj, B.; Muthu, S.; Xavier, T. Antimicrobial activity of Aspergillus niger synthesized titanium dioxide nanoparticles. Adv. Appl. Sci. Res. 2015, 6, 45–48. [Google Scholar]
  33. Zhang, H.; Li, Q.; Lu, Y.; Sun, D.; Lin, X.; Deng, X.; He, N.; Zheng, S. Biosorption and bioreduction of diamine silver complex by Corynebacterium. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2005, 80, 285–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Abass, A.A.; Abdulridha, W.M.; Alaarage, W.K.; Abdulrudha, N.H.; Haider, J. Evaluating the antibacterial effect of cobalt nanoparticles against multi-drug resistant pathogens. J. Med. Life 2021, 14, 823–833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Haghighi, F.; Roudbar Mohammadi, S.; Mohammadi, P.; Hosseinkhani, S.; Shipour, R. Antifungal activity of TiO2 nanoparticles and EDTA on Candida albicans biofilms. Infect. Epidemiol. Med. 2013, 1, 33–38. [Google Scholar]
  36. Kamikawa, Y.; Hirabayashi, D.; Nagayama, T.; Fujisaki, J.; Hamada, T.; Sakamoto, R.; Kamikawa, Y.; Sugihara, K. In vitro antifungal activity against oral Candida species using a denture base coated with silver nanoparticles. J. Nanomater. 2014, 2014, 780410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Alhotan, A.; Yates, J.; Zidan, S.; Haider, J.; Silikas, N. Flexural Strength and Hardness of Filler-Reinforced PMMA Targeted for Denture Base Application. Materials 2021, 14, 2659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Alhotan, A.; Yates, J.; Zidan, S.; Haider, J.; Silikas, N. Assessing Fracture Toughness and Impact Strength of PMMA Reinforced with Nano-Particles and Fibre as Advanced Denture Base Materials. Materials 2021, 14, 4127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Alhotan, A.; Elraggal, A.; Yates, J.; Haider, J.; Jurado, C.A.; Silikas, N. Effect of Different Solutions on the Colour Stability of Nanoparticles or Fibre Reinforced PMMA. Polymers 2022, 14, 1521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Totu, E.E.; Nechifor, A.C.; Nechifor, G.; Aboul-Enein, H.Y.; Cristache, C.M. Poly (methyl methacrylate) with TiO2 nanoparticles inclusion for stereolitographic complete denture manufacturing—The future in dental care for elderly edentulous patients? J. Dent. 2017, 59, 68–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Waly, G.H. Effect of incorporating undoped or silver-doped photocatalytic titanium dioxide on the antifungal effect and dynamic viscoelastic properties of long-term acrylic denture liners. Future Dent. J. 2018, 4, 8–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Azmy, E.; Alkholy, M.R.; Helal, M.A. Microbiological evaluation for antifungal activity of some metal oxides nanofillers incorporated into cold cured soft lining materials: Clinical based study. Braz. Dent. Sci. 2022, 25, e2921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Fadhil Al-Tu’ma, A.; Zaki, Z.D.M.; Ahmed, R.; Abbood, S.K.; Ruhaima, A.A.K.; Hamoodah, Z.J.; Abed, A.S.; Pavlova, I.V. Inhibitory Effect of ZrO2NPs on Candida Albicans in Heat-Cured Acrylic-Based Soft Lining Material. J. Nanostructures 2022, 12, 771–773. [Google Scholar]
  44. Kulak-Ozkan, Y.; Kazazoglu, E.; Arikan, A. Oral hygiene habits, denture cleanliness, presence of yeasts and stomatitis in elderly people. J. Oral Rehabil. 2002, 29, 300–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Pazokifard, S.; Esfandeh, M.; Mirabedini, S.M.; Mohseni, M.; Ranjbar, Z. Investigating the role of surface treated titanium dioxide nanoparticles on self-cleaning behavior of an acrylic facade coating. J. Coat. Technol. Res. 2013, 10, 175–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. AlQahtani, G.M.; AlSuhail, H.S.; Alqater, N.K.; AlTaisan, S.A.; Akhtar, S.; Khan, S.Q.; Gad, M.M. Polymethylmethacrylate denture base layering as a new approach for the addition of antifungal agents. J. Prosthodont. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Amano, D.; Ueda, T.; Sugiyama, T.; Takemoto, S.; Oda, Y.; Sakurai, K. Improved brushing durability of titanium dioxide coating on polymethylmethacrylate substrate by prior treatment with acryloxypropyl trimethoxysilane-based agent for denture application. Dent. Mater. J. 2010, 29, 97–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Raju, K.; Natrajan, S.; Krishnamurthy, P. Evaluation of Antimicrobial Efficacy of Titanium Dioxide on Dental Plaque Colonisers: An In-vitro Study. J. Clin. Diagn. Res. 2022, 16, ZC45–ZC48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Dentistry 11 00090 g001 550
Figure 1. (A) Plastic patterns and (B) plastic patterns imbedded in silicone mold and stone, and (C) the molds after removing the patterns.
Figure 1. (A) Plastic patterns and (B) plastic patterns imbedded in silicone mold and stone, and (C) the molds after removing the patterns.
Dentistry 11 00090 g001
Dentistry 11 00090 g002 550
Figure 2. Soft liner specimens after curing (A) within the molds and (B) outside the molds.
Figure 2. Soft liner specimens after curing (A) within the molds and (B) outside the molds.
Dentistry 11 00090 g002
Dentistry 11 00090 g003 550
Figure 3. (A) Photographs of colonies of C. albicans on SDA and (B) optical microscopy image of candida, which appears as Gram-positive small oval or budding yeast cells.
Figure 3. (A) Photographs of colonies of C. albicans on SDA and (B) optical microscopy image of candida, which appears as Gram-positive small oval or budding yeast cells.
Dentistry 11 00090 g003
Dentistry 11 00090 g004 550
Figure 4. Formation of the C. albicans germ tube.
Figure 4. Formation of the C. albicans germ tube.
Dentistry 11 00090 g004
Dentistry 11 00090 g005 550
Figure 5. (A) SEM image, (B) Ti and O particle map, and (C) EDX analysis of the TiO2 NPs.
Figure 5. (A) SEM image, (B) Ti and O particle map, and (C) EDX analysis of the TiO2 NPs.
Dentistry 11 00090 g005
Dentistry 11 00090 g006 550
Figure 6. SEM images of (A) PEMA and PEMA-TiO2 nanocomposite: (B) 1.0 wt.% (C) 1.5%, and (D) 2.0 wt.%.
Figure 6. SEM images of (A) PEMA and PEMA-TiO2 nanocomposite: (B) 1.0 wt.% (C) 1.5%, and (D) 2.0 wt.%.
Dentistry 11 00090 g006
Dentistry 11 00090 g007 550
Figure 7. Box plot of the C. albicans viable count for different PEMA-TiO2 nanoparticle groups and the control group (pure PEMA). A horizontal line connecting two groups indicated a statistically significant difference.
Figure 7. Box plot of the C. albicans viable count for different PEMA-TiO2 nanoparticle groups and the control group (pure PEMA). A horizontal line connecting two groups indicated a statistically significant difference.
Dentistry 11 00090 g007
Dentistry 11 00090 g008 550
Figure 8. SDA plates showing CFU/mL of C. albicans for each group of study: (A) control with a large number of fungal colonies compared with the nanocomposites with different TiO2 NPs concentrations showing a decreased number of colonies: (B) 1.0 wt.% (C) 1.5%, and (D) 2.0 wt.%.
Figure 8. SDA plates showing CFU/mL of C. albicans for each group of study: (A) control with a large number of fungal colonies compared with the nanocomposites with different TiO2 NPs concentrations showing a decreased number of colonies: (B) 1.0 wt.% (C) 1.5%, and (D) 2.0 wt.%.
Dentistry 11 00090 g008
Table
Table 1. Details of the main materials used in this study.
Table 1. Details of the main materials used in this study.
NumberDescriptionManufacturer
1Vertex-soft Polyethyl methacrylate denture linerVertex, The Netherlands
2Titanium dioxide nanoparticles (TiO2 NPs, anatase structure, 10–30 nm)SkySpring, USA
3Addition Silicone impression materialVertex, The Netherlands
4Type IV Dental stoneZhermack, Italy
5Sabouraud dextrose agar and Sabouraud dextrose broth Oxoid, UK
6API-Candida BioMérieux, France
Table
Table 2. Descriptive statistics and AFE of the C. albicans viable count results for the experimental and control groups.
Table 2. Descriptive statistics and AFE of the C. albicans viable count results for the experimental and control groups.
Sample GroupsMeanStandard DeviationStandard Error95% Confidence Interval for MeanMin.Max.AFE (%)
Lower BoundUpper Bound
Control (0.0 wt.%)139.8018.5465.865126.53153.071011720.0
1.0 wt.%12.003.9161.2389.2014.8071891.42
1.5 wt.%6.202.3940.7574.497.9121095.57
2 wt.%1.001.0540.3330.251.750399.28
Table
Table 3. One-way ANOVA analysis of the C. albicans viable count.
Table 3. One-way ANOVA analysis of the C. albicans viable count.
Sum of SquaresdfMean SquareFSig.
Between Groups134,072.300344,690.767488.2460.000
Within Groups3295.2003691.533
Total137,367.50039
Table
Table 4. Least significant difference (LSD) test applied on in. albicans viable count results of all the studied groups.
Table 4. Least significant difference (LSD) test applied on in. albicans viable count results of all the studied groups.
SamplesMean Difference (I-J)Sig.
Control1.0 wt.%127.800 *0.000
1.5 wt.%133.600 *0.000
2.0 wt.%138.800 *0.000
1.0 wt.%1.5 wt.%5.8000.184
2.0 wt.%11.000 *0.014
1.5 wt.%2.0 wt.%5.2000.232
Note: * indicates significant difference.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ahmed, A.Q.; Al-Hmedat, S.J.A.-Z.; Hanweet, D.M.; Haider, J. Assessing the Antifungal Activity of a Soft Denture Liner Loaded with Titanium Oxide Nanoparticles (TiO2 NPs). Dent. J. 2023, 11, 90. https://doi.org/10.3390/dj11040090

AMA Style

Ahmed AQ, Al-Hmedat SJA-Z, Hanweet DM, Haider J. Assessing the Antifungal Activity of a Soft Denture Liner Loaded with Titanium Oxide Nanoparticles (TiO2 NPs). Dentistry Journal. 2023; 11(4):90. https://doi.org/10.3390/dj11040090

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ahmed, Amal Qasim, Sattar Jabbar Abdul-Zahra Al-Hmedat, Dunya Malhan Hanweet, and Julfikar Haider. 2023. "Assessing the Antifungal Activity of a Soft Denture Liner Loaded with Titanium Oxide Nanoparticles (TiO2 NPs)" Dentistry Journal 11, no. 4: 90. https://doi.org/10.3390/dj11040090

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop