Previous Article in Journal
Prototypes of Highly Effective Stress Balancing AlN Interlayers in MOVPE GaN-on-Si (111)
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Influences of π-Conjugated Aliphatic Chains in Ionic Liquids of Antimony Pentachloride with Pyridine Imidazolium Hybrid Salts: A DFT Study
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Comparative Removal Properties of Sodium Magadiite and Its Protonic Form on Basic-Blue 41 from Contaminated Aqueous Solution

1
Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Islamic University of Madinah, Madinah 42351, Saudi Arabia
2
Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Taibah University, Madinah 30002, Saudi Arabia
3
Laboratory of Applied Organic Chemistry (LCOA), Chemistry Department, Faculty of Sciences and Techniques, Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah University, Imouzzer Road, P.O. Box 2202, Fez 30000, Morocco
4
Engineering Laboratory of Organometallic, Molecular Materials, and Environment (LIMOME), Faculty of Sciences, Chemistry Department, Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah University, P.O. Box 1796, Fez 30000, Morocco
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Inorganics 2025, 13(9), 303; https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics13090303
Submission received: 10 August 2025 / Revised: 2 September 2025 / Accepted: 5 September 2025 / Published: 9 September 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Metal Ion Research and Applications)

Abstract

Sodium magadiite (Na-Mgd) was hydrothermally prepared and converted to its protonic (H-Mgd) form by reaction with hydrochloric (HCl) solution. The obtained products were studied as adsorbents for basic blue 41 (BB-41) removal from polluted aqueous solution. Na-Mgd and H-Mgd were characterized by different techniques. Powder X-ray (PXRD) diffraction data confirmed a pure Na-Mag phase and its conversion to acidic form (H-Mgd) with shift in d001 value from 1.54 nm to 1.12 nm. X-ray fluorescence (XRF) data supported the exchange of Na cations by protons for H-Mag. 29Si magic angle spinning nuclear magnetic resonance (MAS-NMR) indicated a change in the local environment of silicon nucleus when Na-Mgd was treated with HCl solution. The BB-41 removal dyes were investigated throughout the batch process. Effects of selected parameters, for example, the adsorbent dosage, pH of the BB-41 solution, pH of the H-Mag solid, and starting concentration, were explored. The equilibrium data were fitted to the Langmuir and Freundlich isotherm models. The maxima removal capacities of Na-Mgd and H-Mgd were 219 mg/g and 114 mg/g, respectively. The regeneration and reusability tests were performed using initial concentrations of 50 mg/L and 200 mg/L for seven cycles. The efficiency was maintained for 5 to 6 cycles with a decline of 10% using low initial concentration; however, a decline of efficiency to 30 to 50% was achieved when a higher initial concentration was employed after 3 to 4 regeneration tests for Na-Mgd and H-Mgd samples. Adsorber batch design using the Langmuir and Freundlich isotherm parameters was used to predict its performance for commercial usage. The predicted masses of H-Mgd were higher than those of Na-Mgd to treat different effluent volumes contaminated with 200 mg/L of BB-41 dyes at desired removal percentages.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Significant attention is growing from the technical and scientific communities to the layered silicates due to their interesting properties. One of the members of this family is the Na-Mgd with a general formula of Na2Si14O29⋅nH2O, where n varies from 0 to 20, and a cation exchange capacity (CEC) in the range of 100 to 200 meq/100 g [1,2]. It has been shown that they have a high CEC when contrasted to clay minerals and zeolites [3,4]. This material is described as the most pervasive material on earth, is half-abandoned and half-disregarded [5]. Nonetheless, in recent years, it has not been disregarded [6].
Layered silicates have a large number of silanol groups (SiO or SiOH) covering the interlayer surface, in contrast to layered clays that possess silanol groups only at the edges of their layers [7]. Diverse applications emerged for these materials: they were proposed as catalyst supports for specific reactions [8], precursors to prepare zeolite materials [9], electrical capacitors [5], isolators for anticorrosion and mitigating hydrogen evolution [10], composites [6], and adsorbents for water contaminants such as dyes and metals [11,12,13,14,15,16,17]. Na-Mgd can exist naturally or be prepared in the laboratory. It is synthesized easily by treating a simple mixture of silica source, alkaline solution, and water in hydrothermal Teflon autoclaves at different temperatures and periods of time [16]. Recently, the different parameters that affected the synthesis of Na-Mgd have been reported and discussed in detail; pure Na-Mgd phase is achieved at mild temperatures and in a narrow range of SiO2/NaOH/H2O molar ratios [16].
Na-Mgd exhibited a negative charge, and it is used to remove basic dyes with a positive charge once dissolved in water [17,18]. However, for dyes negatively charged (or acidic dyes), the raw Na-Mgd is submitted to specific modification to change its surface charge character from negative to positive. In this regard, the hydrophilic Mgd is transformed to hydrophobic or organophilic silicates by reaction with surfactant solution [11,12]. The removal of Eosin and rhodamine-B dyes is successfully achieved using organomagadiites, and it is closely related to the content of surfactant cations incorporated in the Magd materials [11,12].
The chemical composition of Mgd material can be tuned by exchanging the Na cations with protons during the reaction of Na-Mgd solid with HCl solution at room temperature. The obtained H-Mgd is identified as acidic or protonic magadiite with the general formula of H2Si14O29·nH2O [19,20]. The exchange of Na cations is supported by different techniques, and the solid pH is changed from basic to acidic character, which affects the removal properties of the magadiite solids [20].
In case of Methylene blue or basic blue-41 removal properties, the pH is considered one of the major factors that needs to be controlled during the removal process [16,17,20]. The amounts of these dyes removed are mainly related to the cation exchange capacity values and not to the specific surface areas, as is believed for other materials [21].
A monoazo-basic dye with a vivid blue color, basic blue-41, is frequently utilized for dyeing acrylic, nylon, silk, cotton, and wool [22]. Additionally, it acts well as a stainer to identify bone marrow, blood, and avian leukocytes [23]. Most likely, it is considered one of the most hazardous materials. It causes irreversible harm to both human and animal eyes, while consumption through the mouth results in a burning feeling and may cause nausea, vomiting, excessive perspiration, mental disorientation, and methemoglobinemia [24]. Coagulation, filtration, adsorption, and other conventional methods are employed to reduce the content of dyes [25,26,27]. However, these methods have not been able to fully eliminate organic contaminants from wastewater, resulting in secondary problems. Often, an additional step is employed in the traditional wastewater treatment methods [27].
There is scarce research on protonic magadiite usage as a removal agent for basic dye, and only one research paper was reported in the literature focused on the usage of H-Mgd to adsorb methylene blue from an aqueous solution [20]. In this study, H-Mgd has attracted attention as a potential precursor for BB-41 removal. Within this realm, the synthesis of this material and characterization were reported in detail using different techniques. The level of BB-41 removal from wastewater is affected by several factors, including adsorbent dose, temperature, pH, treatment time, and initial concentrations (Ci). In this study, some of these factors were investigated, such as Ci values, the material dose, pH solution, and effects of acid treatment. Two isotherm models were tested to determine the maximum removal capacities of Na-Mgd and H-Mgd samples. The regeneration and reusability of these materials are important factors to be considered [28]. In this regard, the samples were submitted to seven consecutive regeneration tests using a benign, friendly method to the environment. The required masses of Mgd materials were estimated by designing a single batch adsorber to treat various effluent volumes with a particular initial concentration.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. X Ray Diffraction Data

Figure 1a indicates that Na-Mgd is a pure phase, and the reflections coincided well with the ones reported in the literature [29,30,31]. The pattern exhibited typical reflections of (001), (002), and (003), with an average basal spacing of 1.54 nm. The other reflections were indexed to the (020), (021), (202), (022), and (203) planes in good agreement with in agreement with ICDD 42-1350 card [32]. The d001 value of 1.54 nm depended on the cation type that existed in the interlayer spacing. Copper Mgd exhibited a d001 value of 1.36 nm due to the exchange of hydrated sodium ions by small copper ions [33]. In some cases, the interactions of the cations with ≡Si-O groups and the variation in the amount of interlayer water affected the d001 values [34].
After treatment of Na-Mgd with HCl solution, H-Mgd exhibited a different PXRD pattern with a basal spacing (d001) value of 1.21 nm, resulting from the exchange of Na cations by protons. In some cases, a value of 1.32 nm was reported for H-Mgd material [35]. The other reflections were indexed based on the acidic magadiite (ICDD 29-0668) [36]. Changes in shape and intensity of some reflections occurred due to low crystallinity and to a stacking disorder upon proton exchange. Similar data were reported for clay minerals treated with sulfuric acid [21,37].
According to the XRF analysis summarized in Table 1, the chemical composition of the Na-Mag sample was close to that reported for similar materials, with some differences due to the synthesis conditions [16]. The exchange of Na cations with protons was successfully achieved after treatment with HCl solution. Significant reduction in Na2O (% in weight) from 5.41% to almost 0% was observed [38,39], and associated with a decrease in total mass loss between 25 and 800 °C.

2.2. FTIR Data

The FTIR spectrum of the Na-Mgd sample is depicted in Figure 2a. The spectrum exhibited similar shapes reported for similar materials [40,41], with Si-OH and OH of hydration water being attributed to the normal OH stretching at 3666, 3587, and 3440 cm−1, respectively [40]. The deconvolution of this broad band revealed the presence of four bands (Figure 3a). The vibrations linked to hydrogen bonding between free water molecules and Si-OH groups and the hydration water of sodium cations were also observed at 1680 cm−1 and 1635 cm−1, respectively [41].
While the 1680 cm−1 describes doubly hydrogen-bound water molecules, the position at 1635 cm−1 is indicative of water molecules interacting with Na+ cations, noticed in swelling clay minerals. The terminal Si-O stretching in Q3 species gave rise to bands at 1081 and 1020 cm−1 (Figure 2a), while the Si-O-Si asymmetric stretching was detected at 1240 and 1163 cm−1 [40]. The deconvolution of the broad band is presented in Figure 4a. Si-O-Si symmetric stretching modes were found at 828 and 790 cm−1. Simple and double ring Si-O-Si bending deformations were attributed to the bands at 632 and 452 cm−1 [40].
The silicate framework’s bands remained the same when protons were substituted for the sodium cations. The FTIR spectra of H-Mgd and Na-Mgd were comparable (Figure 2b). The bands varied in relative intensity and form. Because H+ cations are less hydrophilic than Na+ cations [41,42], the bands connected to OH vibrations at 3630 cm−1 and 1637 cm−1 were less strong (Figure 3b). The deformation water band at 1680 cm−1 vanished for the H-Mgd. The presence of protons, which are less hydrated than the Na cations, could be the reason. More pronounced bands related to silanol groups in the 3200–3750 cm−1 interval were recorded (Figure 2b and Figure 3b). Two single broad bands at 1184 cm−1 and 1070 cm−1 were also noticed (Figure 4b). The sodium replacement with protons resulted in an improvement of the 3442 cm−1 band with an additional one at 715 cm−1. The difference is associated with the structure of the H-Mgd and with the dehydroxylation of the magadiite silicate layers [42].

2.3. 29Si MAS NMR Data

29Si-MAS NMR was used to analyze the connectivity of the silicon atoms in the Na-Mgd structure. Na-Mgd spectrum is presented in Figure 5a. There were two signals in the Q4 area (−112 and −114 ppm) assigned to [Si(4OSi)] in various chemical environments, as well as a signal in the Q3 region (−100 ppm) attributable to [Si(3OSi) (OH)] and [Si(3OSi) (O-Na+)] [43,44]. Different Si-O-Si binding angles between Si(OSi)4 can be the source of two signals relating to Q4 sites. In some cases, a third resonance peak at −110 ppm was reported; it has been proposed that the three Q4 sites may differ by their average Si-O-Si bond angles [44]. In this study, it was difficult to detect and could overlap. However, after deconvolution of the spectrum, this peak was easily detected (Figure S1). The presence of this peak depended on the synthesis conditions [16,43].
The H-Mgd sample exhibited a similar spectrum to Na-Mgd (Figure 5b) with some variation in intensity and shape of specific resonance peaks [44]. The intensity of the band at −101 ppm decreased in intensity, and the strong band centered at −111 ppm became broad, with the band at −114 ppm detected as a shoulder. The deconvolution of the broad peak revealed the existence of three peaks (Figure S2). Similar data were reported for other H-Mgd prepared from different silica sources and conditions [42]. A little shift in the resonance peaks was also noted, associated with slight variations in the Si-O-Si angles as a result of changes in local restrictions after HCl treatment [44]. The Q4/Q3 ratio (in terms of area) was estimated to be 2 and 3 for Na-Mgd and H-Mgd, respectively. The increase in the Q4/Q3 ratio confirmed the acid treatment of Na-Mgd and exchange of Na cations with protons.

2.4. TGA Data

The TGA/DTG features of Na-Mgd reveal three distinct mass loss steps in the range of 25 to 800 °C. The first step from 25 °C to 200 °C (Figure 6a, left and right) was related to the removal of water molecules from different environments [16] as indicated by FTIR data. The initial 5.86% step, which took place between 25 and 100 °C, was attributed to the desorption of the physisorbed water from the Na-Mgd’s surface and was accompanied by a DTG peak at 85 °C. The loss of interlayer water molecules and those bonded to the Na cations was linked to the second step, at a rate of 5.57% and occurred between 100 °C and 200 °C [16,30] and was associated with two DTG peaks at 115 and 127 °C, respectively. The basal spacing (d001) is reduced to 1.14 nm in this range (Figure S3). The silanol dehydroxylation, which forms siloxane linkages, was attributed to the continuous decrease in mass loss of about 0.70% at temperatures over 200 °C, and a weak DTG peak at 280 °C was observed. For temperatures above 300 °C to 800 °C, a constant and undefinable mass loss of 1% was also noted; this was ascribed to the full dehydroxylation of the layered structure [16], and a broad DTG peak was detected during this stage at 580 °C. The PXRD data indicated that Na-Mgd was converted to an amorphous silica phase at 500 °C, and then to a crystalline quartz phase at temperatures higher than 800 °C [16].
H-Mgd showed a distinct feature from Na-Mgd with an initial mass loss of 2.8% below 300 °C, associated with the removal of water from the H-Mgd’s surface (Figure 6b, left). The exchange of Na cations by protons was linked to a decrease in the amounts of intercalated water, as evidenced by the reduction in the total mass loss in the 25–200 °C range [30]. The removal of OH groups from the structure was associated with the mass loss over 300 °C (Figure 6b, left). The DTG curve was very different (Figure 6b, right); it showed a single peak at 356 °C, and a broad peak with low intensity at 670 °C. The total mass loss between 25 °C and 800 °C was 14.6% and 5.14% for Na-Mgd and H-Mgd, respectively (Table 1).

2.5. SEM Micrographs Data

The SEM monographs of different materials are shown in Figure 7. Na-Mgd exhibited a particle morphology composed of silicate layers intergrown to form spherical structures resembling rosettes (Figure 7a,b). After HCl treatment, the morphology of cauliflower was almost lost, which was related to the decrease in the crystallinity detected by powder XRD (Figure 7c,d) [21,45,46].
The EDX analysis revealed that three elements existed mainly in Na-Mgd (O, Na, and Si). The O element is the major element, in addition to the Si and Na elements. The content of Na element was in the range of 3.77%. However, the H-Mgd sample contained a lower percentage of Na, close to zero %; this fact was related to exchange of Na cations with protons from the HCl solution, and confirmed the data presented in Table 1.

2.6. Textural Properties

The textural properties of Na-Mgd and H-Mgd are summarized in Table 2. The nitrogen isotherm adsorption data revealed that the Na-Mgd exhibited an isotherm type IV characteristic of non-porous material, with a specific surface area (SBET) of 29 m2/g. The low value is typical of layered solids. Comparable data were stated for similar materials [16,46,47]. Some values of 19 m2/g to 39 m2/g were reported by some authors and could be affected by the synthesis conditions. However, a slight increase in the SBET value was observed for H-Mgd; it reached 40 m2/g. The shape of the isotherm was similar to that reported for other acidic magadiites. However, in some cases, an enhancement of the SBET was reported and attained a value of 54 m2/g [48]. The total pore volume (T.P.V.) of H-Mgd (0.263 cm3/g) was higher than Na-Mgd (0.196 cm3/g) with a decrease in average pore diameter (A.P.D) from 29 nm to 25.8 nm. The A.P.D. is related to voids between the magadiite particles, and the variation could be assigned to the reorganization of the particles during the acid treatment as revealed by the SEM technique.

3. Factors Affecting the Removal of BB-41

The Equations (S1) and (S2) are used to estimate the removal percentage (R%) and removed amount (qe, mg/g),

3.1. Initial Concentration Impact

The concentration of contaminants in aqueous solution plays a significant role in their removal onto solid surfaces [49]. The impact of the initial concentration of the BB-41 dye on H-Mgd removal efficiency was studied and presented in Figure 8 left. The data revealed that as the BB-41 concentration increased, the removal percentage decreased from 100% to 20%. At the beginning of the process, a large number of active sites were available for removal. However, as the concentration of the BB-41 dye increased, these active sites on the removal solid became saturated, which resulted in fewer active sites left for removal assistance. In simpler terms, the mass of the solid was unchanged, implying the number of removal sites was kept constant. At lower concentrations, there were more active sites than dye molecules. However, as the concentration increased, the number of dye molecules did too, and the sites became saturated, leading to a decline in BB-41 removal efficiency. This phenomenon has been noted in previous studies and is in line with comparable findings [16,50,51]. On the other hand, the BB-41 removal amount (mg/g) increased with BB-41’s Ci values, owing to the induction of driving forces (by initial concentration) to overcome the resistance to the mass transfer of BB-41 between aqueous and solid phases. The increase of Ci also enhanced the interaction between the removal agent and BB-41. The Na-Mgd sample exhibited similar behavior with the increase in the removal efficiency and the removed amount as reported in a previous study [16].

3.2. Effect of Dosage

The used adsorbent plays a crucial role in the efficiency of removing pollutants from a contaminated solution. It represents the number of adsorbent sites that affected the removal process [52]. Figure 8 right presents the impact of H-Mgd dosage on the BB-41 removal properties. It increased from 26% to 60% as the H-Mgd dose was raised from 0.025 g to 0.2 g. After adding more H-Mgd with masses that are higher than 0.4 g, the removal percentage reached 72%, and it was not effectively improved by employing more H-Mgd samples. Comparable data were reported for Na-Mgd and other layered silicates [16,53,54].
For a fixed volume of BB-41 solution, the number of BB-41 molecules remained constant, and as more H-Mgd mass was added, further removal sites were offered, and the removal percentage was improved. However, the maximum amount removed of 104 mg/g was obtained at the minimum dose (0.025 g). As the H-Mgd mass rose, the amount removed decreased from 104 mg/g to 7.2 mg/g because of the split in the flux or the concentration gradient between the solute concentration in the solution and the solute concentration on the adsorbent surface [55].
Furthermore, as Equation (S2) shows, the utilized mass and qe (mg/g) have an inverse relationship. This means that a high concentration of adsorbent lowers the number of adsorption sites per unit mass, which reduces the quantity of removal.

3.3. Effect of pH Environment

3.3.1. Effect of BB-41 pH Solution

An important consideration is the dye solution’s pH. It affected the chemistry of the dye solution in terms of the degree of ionization and the charge of the used material’s surface [56].
The BB-41 dye exhibited superior removal in a basic environment due to its cationic characteristic (Figure 9). At basic pH levels, an increase in OH ions deprotonated the surface and resulting in a strong electrostatic bond between the negatively charged adsorbent surface and the positively charged BB-41 molecules. This fact is highlighted in Figure 9, where a diminution pH level reduced the BB-41 removal efficiency. However, a lower pH value decreased the negatively charged sites, resulting in electrostatic repulsion between BB-41 molecules and the H-Mgd surface, thereby hindering the BB-41 removal. At higher pH values greater than 10.5, the BB-41 dye was unstable and a brown precipitate was formed, and further studies could not be carried out [16].
It was reported that the point zero charge values determine the charge of the adsorbent’s surface [57]. The latter determines the pH values at which the surface acquires a negative or positive charge, and it is known as pHpzc. The pHpzc reported for Na-Mgd was close to 8 [16], and a higher value of 8.8 was also reported [17]. After the acid treatment, the pHpzc of H-Mgd decreased to 3.7. This value was in the range of 3.6 to 4.5, reported for similar materials [13]. The decrease in pHpzc indicated a change in the surface charge. Similar reduction was also noted for clay minerals treated with an acid solution [58]. The pHpzc is closely related to the change in acidic or basic properties of the materials as reported for carbon materials [59].
At pH values lower than pHpzc, the surface of the adsorbent acquires a positive charge and thus leads to an electrostatic repulsion between the BB-41 cations and the H-Mag surface. While at pH values higher than pHpzc, the surface acquires a negative charge, which thus affects the percentage of BB-41 removal by enhancing the electrostatic force between the BB-41 and the negatively charged surface of H-Mgd.

3.3.2. Effect of H-Mgd pH Suspension

In this part, the pH solution of BB-41 was not altered. However, the H-Mgd solid was treated with different volumes of NaOH (0.1 M) to change the acidic to basic character of H-Mgd. The BB-41 solution exhibited a pH of about 5.4. By adding pristine H-Mgd solid, the pH of the suspension BB-41 and H-Mgd was reduced to 3, which affected the low removal properties of BB-41. However, when adding H-Mgd soaked in alkaline solution, the final pH of the BB-41 and H-Mgd suspension was increased to 8, resulting in an improvement of BB-41 removal efficiency to 100%. Further treatment with NaOH did not lead to an improvement in removal efficiency because it had already reached 100%. The PXRD data indicated that the H-Mgd was converted to Na-Mgd when treated with 30 mL of NaOH solution (0.1 M), and the d001 value was expanded from 1.21 nm to 1.56 nm, consistent with the data published in the literature [60]. However, when H-Mgd was treated with less volume of NaOH solution, no change in PXRD pattern was observed, which indicated the chemical stability of the H-Mgd sample. In this case, one has to be careful when treating the H-Mgd solid with NaOH solution. However, when H-Mgd was treated with NaCl solution, the PXRD pattern indicated no change in the d001 value of 1.21 nm, independently of the added volume of NaCl solution (0.1 M).

3.4. Effect of Acid Treatment of Na-Mgd

The acid treatment of Na-Mgd had no effect on the removal efficiency; all dye molecules were eliminated at a lower Ci of 100 mg/L, and 100% removal percentage was attained. However, H-Mgd’s removal efficiency values decreased and were below those of Na-Mgd at Ci values higher than 200 mg/L. Similar data were reported using acid-activated clay minerals [37]. In this instance, SBET was not the most essential issue in improving H-Mgd’s removal capabilities. As previously reported, the decrease in H-Mgd’s pH solid might have contributed to this performance. The electrostatic interaction between the surface and the positively charged dye species was reduced as the surface was more positively charged.

3.5. Adsorption Isotherms Data

Adsorption isotherms are essential to comprehend the distribution process of BB-41 dye in the liquid phase when it reaches the equilibrium conditions. Freundlich and Langmuir equations were utilized to elucidate the adsorption isotherm data. Equations (S3) and (S4) displayed the formula for the isotherm models under examination. In monolayer adsorption, where the majority of the adsorption sites have the same affinities for the pollutant, the Langmuir isotherm model is typically employed [61]. When the adsorption site has a particular binding energy, heterogeneous and multilayer adsorption processes are expressed by the Freundlich isotherm model [62]. The maximal removal capacities of Na-Mgd and H-Mgd samples were estimated for comparison purposes. Table 3 summarizes the estimated parameters associated with the linearized and nonlinear isotherms.
The Langmuir model provided a superior fit, as evidenced by higher correlation coefficients (R2), for both Na-Mgd and H-Mgd. This suggests that BB-41 removal is driven by monolayer coverage on a homogenous surface with a finite number of binding sites. The Freundlich model exhibited a lower correlation, indicating that multilayer removal on a heterogeneous surface is not the dominant mechanism for Na-Mgd and H-Mgd samples.
The qmax value of the H-Mgd sample was 114 mg/g, which was less than that of its Na-Mgd counterpart (219 mg/g). This result suggests that the acid treatment had an effect on H-Mgd’s ability to be removed. Similar data were reported when methylene blue dye was investigated. KL value for Na-Mgd was higher than that of H-Mgd, indicating a good affinity between the Na-Mgd’s removal surface and BB-41 dye molecules. The superior qmax value of Na-Mgd compared to H-Mgd can be associated with the basic character of the silanol groups available for removal. Indeed, a suspension of Na-Mgd in water has a pH value of 8.5, while a value of 3.7 was obtained for H-Mag suspension.
The removal of BB-41 dye occurred via cation exchange reaction between the Na cations and the BB-41 dye, as reported in previous studies when high amounts of BB-41 were removed [37,63]. At lower amounts, the removal occurred on the external surface of Na-Mgd. These facts were deduced from the PXRD data before and after the removal process. However, in case of the H-Mgd sample and at neutral pH, the removal process did not involve a cation exchange reaction, and only adsorption on the surface occurred as revealed by PXRD data. By increasing the pH of the BB-41 solution, two processes took place. The first involved the exchange of protons in H-Mgd by Na cations from NaOH solution, which resulted in the regeneration of the resulting Na-Mgd and an increase in removal efficiency. In the current situation, the specific surface area was not a crucial cause as reported for acid-activated clays [37,63].
Table 4 reports the qmax of BB-41 by other layered silicates and aluminosilicate materials. The compared materials were limited to layered silicate and aluminosilicates; other materials were also used in the literature, but they had different chemical compositions and structures. The data indicated that the Na-Mgd and H-Mgd samples exhibited great potential as removal agents for BB-41 from aqueous media. The qmax of 219 mg/g was higher than that of several adsorbent materials, and H-Mgd showed a reasonable qmax of 114 mg/g, still higher than other types of materials, and revealed the potential usage of H-Mgd.

3.6. Regeneration Tests

The regeneration of the adsorbent is one of the major economic concerns, because it lowers operating cost and solves the problems related to the disposal of the spent adsorbent [65,66]. Na-Mgd could be regenerated and reclaimed efficiently for the removal of BB-41 without conceding the removal percentage using a lower initial concentration of BB-41 of 50 mg/L. The removal percentage was maintained after five tests of regeneration. Similar data were reported for H-Mgd; the initial removal percentage was maintained for six cycles.
On the other hand, the removal percentage was maintained only for four recycle tests using a Ci solution of 200 mg/L, with a reduction of 20%; this reduction continued to increase up to 35% after seven regeneration tests for the H-Mgd sample (Figure 10). Na-Mgd lost almost 20% of its effectiveness during the first two cycles. During the third run, the percentage elimination decreased steadily, ranging from 60% to 50%. However, 50% of efficacy was still sustained after the seventh run (Figure 10) [16].
The difference could be related to the strong interactions of BB-41 molecules with the removal sites on Na-Mgd that made their destruction difficult, especially when they were intercalated between the silicate layers. The PXRD pattern exhibited a similar d001 of 1.98 nm after regeneration tests and indicated the stability of the studied Na-Mgd material. In case of H-Mgd, the removal of BB-41 at natural pH did not involve changes in d001 values, and indicated that the destruction of the removed BB-41 dyes was relatively easy due to the facile accessibility of the sulfate radicals, especially for the BB-41 molecules adsorbed on the surface of the H-Mgd sample.

3.7. Single Batch Adsorber Design

This part is considered as a real application of the estimated isotherm parameters to design a single batch adsorber, and to predict the necessary masses of adsorbent to treat different volumes of effluent for target removal percentages. This design will help to reduce the costs, especially for expensive materials, and the environmental impact of such processes [67].
With a solution volume (V) and an adsorbent amount (M), the mass balance for the batch adsorber can be expressed in Equation (1) as follows [68]:
qoM + CoV = qeM + CeV
After rearrangement, Equation (2) will be as follows:
M(qe − qo) = V(Co − Ce)
The relationship between volume (V) and mass (M) is written as in Equation (3):
M V = C o C e q e
By substitution of qe either by the Langmuir or Freundlich models, Equation (4) and Equation (5) are obtained, respectively.
M V = C o C e q m a x · K L · C e 1 + K L · C e
And
M V = C o C e K F · C e 1 / n
Figure 11 left depicts the masses needed of Na-Mgd to decrease the initial Ci of 200 mg/L to targeted removal percentages of 50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, 90%, and 95% and using different effluent volumes (L).
Two common tendencies were noticed: as the effluent’s volume and the removal percentage increased, the anticipated masses of Na-Mgd continued to increase. As a matter of fact, it was anticipated that 5.0 g, 6.1 g, 7.4 g, 9.0 g, 12.0 g, and 16.5 g of Na-Mgd were required in order to reach the target concentrations of 50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, 90%, and 95% for a specific volume of 10 L, respectively.
However, in order to reduce 10 L of solution from 200 mg/L to 100 mg/L, 80 mg/L, 60 mg/L, 40 mg/L, 20 mg/L, and 10 mg/L, respectively, more masses of H-Mgd were needed, such as 16.2 g, 21.6 g, 29.5 g, 43.5 g, 82.1 g, and 156.5 g (Figure 11 right). The lower maximum removal capacity (qmax) of the H-Mgd sample as opposed to the Na-Mgd sample was the reason for the difference between the qmax magnitude of the two samples. Comparable behaviors can be observed for the BB-41 dyes with different materials [16,37,53].
In particular, the necessary mass nearly doubled from 82.1 g to 156.5 g for the H-Mgd sample and from 12.0 g to 16.5 g for the Na-Mgd sample when the removal percentage is expected to increase from 90% to 95% (a 5% increase).
A minor increase in the required masses of Na-Mgd and H-Mgd samples was observed when applying the nonlinear parameters for the Langmuir model compared to the linear parameters model. Figure S4 presents an example of these calculations related to the Na-Mgd sample.
The Langmuir and Freundlich models were utilized to examine the impact of the models on the design process. The required masses for H-Mgd were lower when the Freundlich model was applied compared to those obtained from the Langmuir model (Figure S5). A decrease of more than 50% in H-Mgd’s mass was noticed when a reduction of 95% of the initial concentration of 200 mg/L was targeted to treat 10 L of effluent (Figure 12). The needed masses were found to be underestimated by the Freundlich model and overestimated by the Langmuir model. The discrepancy between the two models was related to the shape of the isotherm curves across the investigated concentration range [69].
During the design phase, the impact of starting concentrations is also taken into account. Using both Na-Mgd and H-Mgd materials, the anticipated masses increased for higher initial concentration levels for a fixed removal percentage of 95% and an effluent volume of 10 L. Figure 13 illustrates the variation in the Na-Mgd and H-Mgd masses with the starting initial concentrations; more masses were needed for higher initial concentrations. For various Ci of 200 mg/L, 300 mg/L, 400 mg/L, 500 mg/L, 600 mg/L, and 700 mg/L, the required Na-Mgd masses were 16.4 g, 20.7 g, 25.1 g, 29.4 g, 33.8 g, and 38.1 g, respectively. As expected, employing the H-Mgd sample, with lower removal capability than Na-Mgd, the needed amounts were increased to 152.3 g, 160.7 g, 169.1 g, 177.5 g, 186.0 g, and 190.3 g for the same procedure (Figure 13).

4. Materials and Characterization

4.1. Materials

Hydrochloric acid, sodium hydroxide, and HS-40% Ludox were provided by Aldrich. The basic blue 41 (BB-41) has a molecular formula of C20H26N4O6S2 with a molar mass of 482.57 g/mol, and was provided by Aldrich. Oxone and cobalt nitrate salt were supplied by Across Organics. All the chemicals were used as obtained.

4.2. Na-Mgd and H-Mgd Preparation

A total of 4.8 g of solid was dissolved in 105 g of distilled water, and then 45 g of Ludox AS-40% colloidal silica was added to the alkaline solution drop by drop while stirring for more than half an hour. Na2O/5SiO2/122H2O was the molar composition of the resultant mixture, which was then stirred for an additional hour at ambient temperature [26]. The mixture was moved inside a Teflon liner autoclave and placed in a static oven at 150 °C for 48 h. After this period, the autoclave was immediately quenched in an ice bath, filtered, and rinsed with distilled water to bring its pH down to almost 7. The solid was air-dried at room temperature. The sample was identified as Na-Mgd.
The transformation of Na-Mgd to H-Mgd was achieved by treating 1 g of Na-Mgd in a solution of 0.1 M HCl for 4 h, followed by filtration and washing repeatedly, and finally, drying at ambient temperature [11].

4.3. Basic Blue-41 Removal Process

Batch adsorption was used to remove BB-41 in duplicate. First, a 1 L stock solution of 1000 mg/L of BB-41 is made. The prepared stock solution was used throughout the study to prepare the required concentrations by dilution. A series of 10 mL of BB-41 solution with various initial concentrations between 25 mg/L to 1000 mg/L was added to separate sealed glass tubes, and 100 mg of Na-Mgd or H-Mgd were suspended in these tubes under shaking in a water bath with a controlled temperature of 25 °C for overnight. After centrifugation, the supernatant’s concentrations were measured at 617 nm using carry 100 UV/VIS spectrometer to determine the removed amount (mg/g) and the removal percentage (%) [26].
The parameters that affected the removal properties were optimized. One parameter at a time must be changed during the optimization process while the others remain constant. Investigation included the effects of the solution’s pH (over a range of 3 to 11), the dosage of Na-Mgd or H-Mgd (ranging from 2 to 5 g/L in a 10 mL solution), and the starting dye concentration (which varied from 25 to 1000 mg/L).

4.4. Regeneration Tests

Oxone and cobalt nitrate solution were used to examine the regeneration of Na-Mgd and H-Mgd samples. Two different C values of 50 mg/L and 200 mg/L were used. The samples were first treated for six hours in a 50 mg/L or 200 mg/L solution of each concentration, and then separated by centrifugation and rinsed with distilled water. A total of 12 milliliters of a solution made up of 12 milligrams of oxone and cobalt nitrate was added to the spent samples for 30 min. Following separation and washing, the resultant samples were treated again with 50 milliliters of fresh BB-41 solutions, and then subjected to the same procedure for seven cycles [26].

4.5. Characterization

Different techniques were used to identify the success of the Na-Mag and H-Mag synthesis. The powder XRD (PXRD) technique was the essential tool to identify the different magadiite phases. An XRD diffractometer (Advance D8 from Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA) was employed and equipped with a Cu-Kα radiation source (λ = 1.5406 Å) operated at 40 kV and 40 mA. X-ray fluorescence (XRF, S4 explorer from Bruker) was used to confirm the presence of Na in Na-Mgd and in H-Mgd. Using pressed KBr pellets and an Shimadzu FTIR spectrometer (Kyoto, Japan), 64 scans were acquired to generate infrared (FTIR) spectra in the 4000–400 cm−1 range at a resolution of 4 cm−1. The mass-loss calculations were performed under a nitrogen flow on a TA instrument (SDT2960 model) (New Castle, DE, USA), with a heating rate of 5 °C/min, between 25 °C and 800 °C. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) from Jeol (model JSM-6700F) (Tokyo, Japan) was employed to examine the morphology of the samples. A Bruker 400 spectrometer set to 29Si NMR frequency 78 MHz was used to collect 29Si MAS NMR spectra. To measure N2 adsorption isotherms, the Autosorb 6 instrument from Quantachrome (Boynton Beach, FL, USA) was used after a degassing temperature of 120 °C. The SBET was estimated using the BET method, the T.P.V. is determined at relative pressure (P/Po) at 0.95, and the A.P.D. is estimated following the relation A.P.D. = 4 × (T.P.V)/SBET. The Variant Cary 100 UV-Vis spectrophotometer (Palo Alto, CA, USA) was used to measure the dye concentration.

5. Conclusions

Na-Mgd and H-Mgd materials were successfully synthesized. The exchange of Na cations was easily attained in HCl solution with a reduction in d001 basal spacing from 1.54 nm to 1.12 nm. Both layered silicates acted as reliable and alternative removal agents for BB-41 dyes. Na-Mgd has the aptitude to intercalate the BB-41 between the interlayer spacing of the matrix using higher initial concentrations. However, this fact occurred when the removal of BB-41 occurred at a higher pH range from 8 to 10, with a first step of exchange of protons by Na cations, and then the exchange of Na cations with BB-41 dye cations. However, at lower pH values, the removal occurred at the surface of the matrix for both materials. High determination coefficient values (R2 > 0.999) suggested that, of the two equilibrium isotherm models used, the Langmuir isotherm best fitted the experimental data over the entire concentration range. For Na-Mgd and H-Mgd, the maximum removal capacities (qmax) were 222 and 108 mg/g, respectively. When seven regeneration cycles were tested, the regeneration results depended on the initial concentrations used. Good reusability was maintained for H-Mgd after four recycle tests, and then it gradually reduced with the increase in cycle number.
During single batch adsorber design, as the treated effluent volumes and the removal percentages increased, additional masses were needed. The Freundlich model underestimated the required masses, while the Langmuir model overestimated them. This study also underlined that selecting the appropriate isotherm is essential to reaching high removal percentages with minimum masses.
Thermodynamic and kinetic studies will be undertaken in the future to understand the removal mechanisms and to reduce the required time for efficient removal percentages.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/inorganics13090303/s1, Figure S1: Deconvolution of 29Si MAS NMR of Na-Mgd sample; Figure S2: Deconvolution of 29Si MAS NMR of H-Mgd sample; Figure S3: in-situ PXRD of Na-Mgd calcined at different temperatures; Figure S4: The predicted masses (g) of H-Mgd calculated using linear (left) and nonlinear (right) Langmuir fitting model to reduce different effluent volumes (L) of BB-41 (Ci = 200 mg/L) to (a) 50%, (b) 60%, (c) 70%, (d) 80%, (e) 90%, and (f) 95%; Figure S5: The predicted masses (g) of H-Mgd calculated using linear (left) and Freundlich (right) Langmuir fitting model to reduce different effluent volumes (L) of BB-41 (Ci = 200 mg/L) to (a) 50%, (b) 60%, (c) 70%, (d) 80%, (e) 90%, and (f) 95%; Equations (S1) and (S2) represent the removed amount (qe, mg/g) and the removal percentage (R, %) of BB-41. Equations (S3) and (S4) represent the linera eqautions of Langmuir and Freundlich isotherm models.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, T.S.A., M.G.A., H.O.H. and F.K.; Methodology, T.S.A., S.A.P., S.R. and H.O.H.; Software, S.A.P., H.O.H. and F.K.; Validation, T.S.A., M.G.A. and S.A.P.; Formal analysis, M.G.A. and R.A.-F.; Investigation, T.S.A., M.G.A., R.A.-F. and S.R.; Resources, T.S.A., S.A.P., S.R. and F.K.; Data curation, M.G.A., R.A.-F., S.A.P., S.R. and H.O.H.; Writing—original draft, T.S.A., R.A.-F., S.R., H.O.H. and F.K.; Writing—review & editing, S.A.P. and F.K.; Visualization, M.G.A., R.A.-F., S.A.P. and H.O.H.; Supervision, S.R. and F.K.; Project administration, F.K.; Funding acquisition, M.G.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are available upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Esmail, D.; Yusuke, I. Microporous layered silicates: Old but new microporous materials. New J. Chem. 2020, 44, 9957–9968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. HomHuan, N.; ImwIset, K.; IrInakorn, T.; Bureekae, S.; Ogawa, M. Ion exchange of a layered alkali silicate, magadiite, with metal ions. Clay Sci. 2017, 21, 21–28. [Google Scholar]
  3. Wang, S.; Peng, Y. Natural zeolites as effective adsorbents in water and wastewater treatment. Chem. Eng. J. 2010, 156, 11–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Sirinakorn, T.; Imwiset, K.; Bureekaew, S.; Ogawa, M. Inorganic modification of layered silicates toward functional inorganic-inorganic hybrids. Appl. Clay Sci. 2018, 153, 187–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Jing, X.; Zhang, Y.; Dong, X.; Mu, Y.; Liu, X.; Meng, C. Layered silicate magadiite–derived three-dimensional honeycomb-like cobalt–nickel silicates as excellent cathode for hybrid supercapacitors. Mater. Today Chem. 2021, 22, 100550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Dos Santos, T.G.; de Assis, G.C.; da Silva, A.O.S.; Meneghetti, S.M.P. Progress in development of magadiite to produce multifunctional lamellar materials. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2022, 15, 43234–43250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Asgari, M.; Sundararaj, U. Pre-exfoliated nanoclay through two consecutive reaction systems: Silane functionalization followed by grafting of amino acid monomers. Appl. Clay Sci. 2018, 151, 81–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Xue, S.; Song, W.; Wang, K.; Zhu, R.; Zhang, X.; Yang, X.; Bae, J.W.; Gao, X.; Ma, Q.; Zhang, J.; et al. Highly efficient synthesis of high-value olefins from syngas over layered Fe-Mn/magadiite catalyst. Chem. Eng. Technol. 2023, 46, 1886–1895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zhang, S.L.; Wang, Y.; Lv, T.M.; Feng, Z.; Liu, X.; Meng, C.G. Hydrothermal conversion of zeolite omega from magadiite with assistance of seed crystals. Mater. Today Chem. 2021, 20, 100440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Du, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Ye, M.; Tang, Y.; Liu, X.; Li, C.C. Unique interlayer chemical environment induced stable zinc plating/stripping via a Zn-based magadiite artificial interphase. J. Power Sources 2023, 554, 232262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kooli, F.; Liu, Y.; Abboudi, M.; Rakass, S.; Hassani, H.O.; Ibrahim, S.M.; Al-Faze, R. Application of organo-magadiites for the removal of eosin dye from aqueous solutions: Thermal treatment and regeneration. Molecules 2018, 23, 2280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ge, M.; Xi, Z.; Zhu, C.; Liang, G.; Yang, Y.; Hu, G.; Jamal, L.; Alam, S.M.J. Adsorption process and properties analyses of a pure magadiite and a modified magadiite on rhodamine-B from an aqueous solution. Processes 2019, 7, 565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Attar, K.; Bouazza, D.; Miloudi, H.; Tayeb, A.; Boos, A.; Sastre, A.M.; Demey-Cedeno, H. Cadmium removal by a low-cost magadiite-based material: Characterization and sorption applications. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2018, 6, 5351–5360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Dinga, H.; Chen, Y.; Fu, T.; Peng, B.; Guo, X. Nanosheet-based magadiite: A controllable two-dimensional trap for selective capture of heavy metals. J. Mater. Chem. A 2018, 6, 13624–13632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ge, M.; Tang, W.; Du, M.; Liang, G.; Hu, G.; Alam, S.M.J. Research on 5-fluorouracil as a drug carrier materials with its in vitro release properties on organic modified magadiite. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2019, 130, 44–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Alanazi, A.M.; Al Dmour, H.; Popoola, S.A.; Hassani, H.O.; Rakass, S.; Al-Faze, R.; Kooli, F. Parameters synthesis of Na-magadiite materials for water treatment and removal of basic blue-41: Properties and single-batch design adsorber. Inorganics 2023, 11, 423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Mokhtar, M. Application of synthetic layered sodium silicate magadiite nanosheets for environmental remediation of methylene blue dye in water. Materials 2017, 10, 760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ge, M.; Cao, L.; Du, M.; Hu, G.; Alam, S.M.J. Adsorptive characterization of a pure magadiite and an organic modified magadiite on removal of methylene blue from related aqueous solution. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2018, 217, 533–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Pinnavaia, T.J.; Johnson, I.D.; Max Lipsicas, M. A 29Si MAS NMR study of tetrahedral site distributions in the layered silicic acid H+-magadiite (H2Si14O29 · nH2O) and in Na+-magadiite (Na2Si14O29 · nH2O). J. Solid State Chem. 1986, 63, 18–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Royer, B.; Cardoso, N.F.; Lima, E.C.; Macedo, T.R.; Airoldi, C. Sodic and acidic crystalline lamellar magadiite adsorbents for the removal of methylene blue from aqueous solutions: Kinetic and equilibrium studies. Sep. Sci. Technol. 2009, 45, 129–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Amari, A.; Gannouni, H.; Khan, M.I.; Almesfer, M.K.; Abubakr, M.; Elkhaleefa, A.M.; Gannouni, A. Effect of structure and chemical activation on the adsorption properties of green clay minerals for the removal of cationic dye. Appl. Sci. 2018, 8, 2302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Hamdi, L.; Boumehdi, L.; Salem, Z. Basic blue 41 dye removal from aqueous solution using lignocellulosic material: Kinetics, equilibrium and statistical design optimization. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2023, 20, 3275–3294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kass, L. Basic Blue 41: A New Panoptic Stain for Blood and Bone Marrow Cells. J. Histotechnol. 1998, 11, 10–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Berradi, M.; Hsissou, R.; Khudhair, M.; Assouag, M.; Cherkaoui, O.; El Bachiri, A.; El Harfi, A. Textile finishing dyes and their impact on aquatic environs. Heliyon 2019, 5, e02711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Aslam, M.M.A.; Kuo, H.W.; Den, W.; Usman, M.; Sultan, M.; Ashraf, H. Functionalized carbon nanotubes (CNTs) for water and wastewater treatment: Preparation to application. Sustainability 2021, 13, 5717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Al-Tohamy, R.; Ali, S.S.; Li, F.; Okasha, K.M.; Mahmoud, Y.A.G.; Elsamahy, T.; Jiao, H.; Fu, Y.; Sun, J. A critical review on the treatment of dye-containing wastewater: Ecotoxicological and health concerns of textile dyes and possible remediation approaches for environmental safety. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2022, 231, 113160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Slama, H.B.; Bouket, A.C.; Pourhassan, Z.; Alenezi, F.N.; Silini, A.; Cherif-Silini, H.; Oszako, T.; Luptakova, L.; Golińska, P.; Belbahri, L. Diversity of synthetic dyes from textile industries, discharge impacts and treatment methods. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 6255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Gkika, D.A.; Mitropoulos, A.C.; Kyzas, G.Z. Why reuse spent adsorbents? The latest challenges and limitations. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 822, 153612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Marler, B.; Krysiak, Y.; Grosskreuz, I.; Gies, H.; Kolb, U. The crystal structure of mineral magadiite, Na2Si14O28(OH)2∙8H2O. Am. Miner. 2022, 107, 2101–2110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kooli, F.; Mianhui, L.; Alshahateet, S.F.; Chen, F.; Yinghuai, Z. Characterization and thermal stability properties of intercalated Na-magadiite with cetyltrimethylammonium (C16TMA) surfactants. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 2006, 67, 926–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Fletcher, R.A.; Bibby, D.M. Synthesis of kenyaite and magadiite in the presence of various anions. Clays Clay Miner. 1987, 35, 318–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Wang, S.F.; Lin, M.L.; Shieh, Y.N.; Wang, Y.R.; Wang, S.J. Organic modification of synthesized clay-magadiite. Ceram. Int. 2007, 33, 681–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Mokhtar, A.; Abdelkrim, S.; Djelad, A.; Bengueddach, A.; Sassi, M. Preparation of biopolymer/CuO-magadiite biocomposite beads by chemical reduction method and their antibacterial activity. Alger. J. Mater. Chem. 2019, 2, 20–32. [Google Scholar]
  34. Eypert-Blaison, C.; Michot, L.J.; Humbert, B.; Pelletier, M.; Villieras, F.; Caillerie, J.B.E. Hydration water and swelling behavior of magadiite. The H+, Na+, K+, Mg2+, and Ca2+ exchanged forms. J. Phys. Chem. B 2002, 106, 730–742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Silva, B.N.N.; Santos, M.F.; Leitao, A.A.; Pastore, H.O. New DFT insights into silicalite formation from layered H-magadiite. Surf. Interfaces 2025, 69, 106754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. de Oliveira, M.M.; Fernandes, M.M.; Fonseca, M.G.; Filho, E.C.S.; Souza, A.G.; Gaslain, F.; Jaber, M. Direct grafting of ethylene sulfide onto silicic acid magadiite. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2014, 196, 292–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Alraddadi, T.S.; Al-Faze, R.; Popoola, S.A.; Alam, M.G.; Rakass, S.; Al Dmour, H.; Kooli, F. Combination of acid and base activation of montmorillonite clay and its impact on the basic blue-41 removal properties: Regeneration and single batch design. Inorganics 2025, 13, 228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Wang, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Zheng, J.; Hu, T.; Meng, C. Synthesis, structure, optical and magnetic properties of interlamellar decoration of magadiite using vanadium oxide species. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2017, 244, 264–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Steudel, A.; Batenburg, L.F.; Fischer, H.R.; Weidler, P.G.; Emmerich, K. Alteration of non-swelling clay minerals and magadiite by acid activation. Appl. Clay Sci. 2009, 44, 95–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Eypert-Blaison, C.; Humbert, B.; Michot, L.J.; Pelletier, M.; Sauzeat, E.; Villieras, F. Structural role of hydration water in Na- and H-magadiite: A spectroscopic study. Chem. Mater. 2001, 13, 4439–4446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Huang, Y.; Jiang, Z.; Schwieger, W. Vibrational spectroscopic studies of layered silicates. Chem. Mater. 1999, 11, 1210–1217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Macedo, T.R.; Airoldi, C. Host lamellar silicic acid magadiite for some heterocyclic amine inclusions and quantitative calorimetric data. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2006, 94, 81–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Vieira, R.B.; Pastore, H.O. Polyethylenimine-magadiite layered silicate sorbent for CO2 capture. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014, 48, 2472–2480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Rojo, J.M.; Sanz, J.; Ruiz-Hitzky, E.; Serratosa, J.M. 29Si MAS-N.M.R. spectra of lamellar silicic acid H-magadiite and its trimethylsilyl derivative. Z. Anorg. Und Allg. Chem. 1986, 540, 227–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Nunes, A.R.; Araújo, K.R.O.; Moura, A.O.; Prado, A.G.S. Magadiite as a support for the controlled release of herbicides. Chem. Pap. 2018, 72, 479–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Moura, H.M.; Pastore, H.O. Functionalized mesoporous solids based on magadiite and [Al]-magadiite. Dalton Trans. 2014, 43, 10471–10483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. e Silva, J.M.D.S.; Paul, G.; Bendall, J.; Bisio, C.; Marchese, L.; Pastore, H.O. Novel insights on magadiite disaggregation: A multitechnique study on thermal stability. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2013, 15, 13434–13445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Ide, Y.; Tominaka, S.; Kono, H.; Ram, R.; Machida, A.; Tsunoji, N. Zeolitic intralayer microchannels of magadiite, a natural layered silicate, to boost green organic synthesis. Chem. Sci. 2018, 9, 8637–8643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Rápó, E.; Tonk, S. Factors affecting synthetic dye adsorption; desorption studies: A review of results from the last five years (2017–2021). Molecules 2021, 26, 5419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Lellou, S.; Kadi, S.; Ouadjenia, F.; Benhebal, H.; Schott, J.; Marouf, R. Synthesis and application of montmorillonite nanocomposites/phenolic resins for the elimination of Basic Blue 41. Desalin. Water Treat. 2021, 218, 389–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Kooli, F.; Liu, Y.; Abboudi, M.; Hassani, H.O.; Rakass, S.; Ibrahim, S.M.; Al Wadaani, F. Waste bricks applied as removal agent of Basic Blue 41 from aqueous solutions: Base treatment and their regeneration efficiency. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 1237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Salleh, M.A.M.; Mahmoud, D.K.; Karim, W.A.W.A.; Idris, A. Cationic and anionic dye adsorption by agricultural solid wastes: A comprehensive review. Desalination 2011, 280, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Al-Madanat, O.Y.; Popoola, S.A.; Al Dmour, H.; Al-Faze, R.; Kooli, F. Na-Kenyaite as Efficient Basic Blue-41 Dye Removal: Synthesis and Regeneration Studies. Water 2024, 16, 2056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Gougazeh, M.; Kooli, F.; Buhl, J.C. Removal efficiency of basic blue 41 by three zeolites prepared from natural jordanian kaolin. Clays Clay Miner. 2019, 67, 143–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Zhao, Z.; Yanhui, L.; Du, Q.; Li, Q. Adsorption of Congo red from aqueous solutions by porous soybean curd Xerogels. Pol. J. Chem. Technol. 2018, 20, 95–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Ercag, A.; Demircivi, P.; Hizal, J. Kinetic, isotherm and pH dependency investigation and environmental application of cationic dye adsorption on montmorillonite. Desalination Water Treat. 2015, 56, 2447–2456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Yagub, M.T.; Sen, T.K.; Afroze, S.; Ang, H.M. Dye and its removal from aqueous solution, by adsorption: A review. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2014, 209, 172–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Kooli, F.; Liu, L.; Al-Faze, R.; Al Suhaimi, A. Effect of acid activation of Saudi local clay mineral on removal properties of basic blue 41 from an aqueous solution. Appl. Clay Sci. 2015, 116–117, 23–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Mahmoudi, K.; Hamdi, N.; Srasra, E. Preparation and characterization of activated carbon from date pits by chemical activation with zinc chloride for methyl orange adsorption. J. Mater. Environ. Sci. 2014, 5, 1758–1769. [Google Scholar]
  60. Kooli, F.; Kiyozumi, Y.; Mizukami, F. Effect of alkali cations on the conversion of H-magadiite in tetramethylammonium hydroxide water 1,4 dioxane system. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2002, 77, 134–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. González-López, M.E.; Laureano-Anzaldo, C.M.; Pérez-Fonseca, A.A.; Arellano, M.; Robledo-Ortíz, J.R. A critical overview of adsorption models linearization: Methodological and statistical inconsistencies. Sep. Purif. Rev. 2022, 51, 358–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Wang, J.; Guo, X. Adsorption isotherm models: Classification, physical meaning, application and solving method. Chemosphere 2020, 258, 127279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Roulia, M.; Vassiliadis, A.A. Interactions between C.I. basic blue 41 and aluminosilicate sorbents. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2005, 291, 37–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Kul, A.R.; Aldemir, A.; Koyuncu, H. An investigation of natural and modified diatomite performance for adsorption of Basic Blue 41: Isotherm, kinetic, and thermodynamic studies. Desalination Water Treat. 2021, 229, 384–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Baskar, A.V.; Bolan, N.; Hoang, S.A.; Sooriyakumar, P.; Kumar, M.; Singh, L.; Jasemizad, T.; Padhye, L.P.; Singh, G.; Vinu, A.; et al. Recovery, regeneration and sustainable management of spent adsorbents from wastewater treatment streams: A review. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 822, 153555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Shahadat, M.M.; Isamil, S. Regeneration performance of clay-based adsorbents for the removal of industrial dyes: A review. RSC Adv. 2018, 8, 24571–24587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Shirazi, E.K.; Metzger, J.W.; Fischer, K.; Hassani, A.H. Design and cost analysis of batch adsorber systems for removal of dyes from contaminated groundwater using natural low-cost adsorbents. Int. J. Ind. Chem. 2020, 11, 101–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Mansour, R.A.; Aboeleneen, N.M.; AbdelMonem, N.M. Adsorption of cationic dye from aqueous solutions by date pits: Equilibrium, kinetic, thermodynamic studies, and batch adsorber design. Int. J. Phytoreme. 2018, 20, 1062–1074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Alyasi, H.; Mackey, H.R.; Loganathan, K.; McKay, G. Adsorbent minimisation in a two-stage batch adsorber for cadmium removal. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2020, 81, 153–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. PXRD patterns of (a) Na-Mgd and (b) H-Mgd samples.
Figure 1. PXRD patterns of (a) Na-Mgd and (b) H-Mgd samples.
Inorganics 13 00303 g001
Figure 2. FTIR spectra of (a) Na-Mgd and (b) H-Mgd samples.
Figure 2. FTIR spectra of (a) Na-Mgd and (b) H-Mgd samples.
Inorganics 13 00303 g002
Figure 3. Deconvolution of the bands in the 4000–3000 cm−1 area: (a) Na-Mgd and (b) H-Mgd samples.
Figure 3. Deconvolution of the bands in the 4000–3000 cm−1 area: (a) Na-Mgd and (b) H-Mgd samples.
Inorganics 13 00303 g003
Figure 4. Deconvolution of the bands in the 1500–950 cm−1 area: (a) Na-Mgd and (b) H-Mgd samples.
Figure 4. Deconvolution of the bands in the 1500–950 cm−1 area: (a) Na-Mgd and (b) H-Mgd samples.
Inorganics 13 00303 g004
Figure 5. 29Si MAS-NMR spectra of (a) Na-Mgd and (b) H-Mgd samples.
Figure 5. 29Si MAS-NMR spectra of (a) Na-Mgd and (b) H-Mgd samples.
Inorganics 13 00303 g005
Figure 6. TGA (left) and DTG (right) features of (a) Na-Mgd and (b) H-Mgd samples.
Figure 6. TGA (left) and DTG (right) features of (a) Na-Mgd and (b) H-Mgd samples.
Inorganics 13 00303 g006
Figure 7. SEM micrographs of (a) Na-Mgd magnification ×3000, (b) Na-Mgd magnification ×5000, (c,d) H-Mgd magnification ×5000.
Figure 7. SEM micrographs of (a) Na-Mgd magnification ×3000, (b) Na-Mgd magnification ×5000, (c,d) H-Mgd magnification ×5000.
Inorganics 13 00303 g007
Figure 8. Effect of (left) initial concentration (Ci, mg/L) and (right) added mass on the removal properties of the H-Mgd sample. The blue circle shows the removal percentage (%), and the red circle shows the removed amount (mg/g).
Figure 8. Effect of (left) initial concentration (Ci, mg/L) and (right) added mass on the removal properties of the H-Mgd sample. The blue circle shows the removal percentage (%), and the red circle shows the removed amount (mg/g).
Inorganics 13 00303 g008
Figure 9. Effect of BB-41 pH solution on the removal percentage of (Inorganics 13 00303 i001) Na-Mgd and (Inorganics 13 00303 i002) H-Mgd samples.
Figure 9. Effect of BB-41 pH solution on the removal percentage of (Inorganics 13 00303 i001) Na-Mgd and (Inorganics 13 00303 i002) H-Mgd samples.
Inorganics 13 00303 g009
Figure 10. Variation in removal efficiency (%) after seven regeneration tests. (Inorganics 13 00303 i003) Na-Mgd and (Inorganics 13 00303 i004) H-Mgd samples.
Figure 10. Variation in removal efficiency (%) after seven regeneration tests. (Inorganics 13 00303 i003) Na-Mgd and (Inorganics 13 00303 i004) H-Mgd samples.
Inorganics 13 00303 g010
Figure 11. The required masses (g) of Na-Mgd (left) and H-Mgd (right) to reduce different effluent volumes (L) of BB-41 (with Ci = 200 mg/L) to (a) 50%, (b) 60%, (c) 70%, (d) 80%, (e) 90%, and (f) 95%.
Figure 11. The required masses (g) of Na-Mgd (left) and H-Mgd (right) to reduce different effluent volumes (L) of BB-41 (with Ci = 200 mg/L) to (a) 50%, (b) 60%, (c) 70%, (d) 80%, (e) 90%, and (f) 95%.
Inorganics 13 00303 g011
Figure 12. Estimated H-Mgd mass (g) to treat 10 L of effluent at different percentages using (Inorganics 13 00303 i005) linear Freundlich and (Inorganics 13 00303 i006) Langmuir models.
Figure 12. Estimated H-Mgd mass (g) to treat 10 L of effluent at different percentages using (Inorganics 13 00303 i005) linear Freundlich and (Inorganics 13 00303 i006) Langmuir models.
Inorganics 13 00303 g012
Figure 13. Required mass (g) of (Inorganics 13 00303 i007) Na-Mgd and (Inorganics 13 00303 i008) H-Mgd to treat 10 L of BB-41 solution with different Ci (mg/L) targeting a removal percentage of 95%.
Figure 13. Required mass (g) of (Inorganics 13 00303 i007) Na-Mgd and (Inorganics 13 00303 i008) H-Mgd to treat 10 L of BB-41 solution with different Ci (mg/L) targeting a removal percentage of 95%.
Inorganics 13 00303 g013
Table 1. Chemical composition of Na-Mgd and H-Mgd samples.
Table 1. Chemical composition of Na-Mgd and H-Mgd samples.
SampleNa2O (wt%)SiO2 (wt%)Total Mass Loss (%) *
Na-Mgd5.4194.2114.6
H-Mgd~0.0099.525.14
* deduced from TGA data.
Table 2. Textural properties of Na-Mgd and H-Mgd samples.
Table 2. Textural properties of Na-Mgd and H-Mgd samples.
SampleA.P.D (nm)T.P.V. (cm3/g)SBET (m2/g)
Na-Mgd290.19626
H-Mgd25.80.26340
Table 3. Estimated isotherm parameters for BB-41 removal by Na-Mgd and H-Mgd samples.
Table 3. Estimated isotherm parameters for BB-41 removal by Na-Mgd and H-Mgd samples.
SamplesLangmuirFreundlich
qmax
(mg/g)
KL
(L/mg)
R21/nKF
(L/mg)
R2
Na-Mgd2190.1120.99980.186666.680.9819
(222) *(0.0681)(0.9172)(0.2149)(57.59)(0.9387)
H-Mgd1140.01230.98910.319312.970.9891
(113.3)(0.0119)(0.9878)(0.3045)(14.36)(0.9878)
* values between parentheses deduced after nonlinear fitting operation.
Table 4. Removal efficiency of selected silicates and aluminosilicate materials.
Table 4. Removal efficiency of selected silicates and aluminosilicate materials.
Samplesqmax (mg/g)References
Na-Mgd219This study
H-Magd114This study
Montmorillonite (Mt)55[37]
Saudi Local clays50–70[58]
Brick wastes60–70[51]
zeolite39–70[54]
Mn modified diatomite77[64]
Acid-activated PGs *43–88[37]
Base acid-activated PGs +92–110[37]
* APG corresponds to acid-activated PG clays, + BAPG corresponds to NaOH-treated acid-activated clays.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Alraddadi, T.S.; Alam, M.G.; Al-Faze, R.; Popoola, S.A.; Rakass, S.; Oudghiri Hassani, H.; Kooli, F. Comparative Removal Properties of Sodium Magadiite and Its Protonic Form on Basic-Blue 41 from Contaminated Aqueous Solution. Inorganics 2025, 13, 303. https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics13090303

AMA Style

Alraddadi TS, Alam MG, Al-Faze R, Popoola SA, Rakass S, Oudghiri Hassani H, Kooli F. Comparative Removal Properties of Sodium Magadiite and Its Protonic Form on Basic-Blue 41 from Contaminated Aqueous Solution. Inorganics. 2025; 13(9):303. https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics13090303

Chicago/Turabian Style

Alraddadi, Thamer S., Mohd Gulfam Alam, Rawan Al-Faze, Saheed A. Popoola, Souad Rakass, Hicham Oudghiri Hassani, and Fethi Kooli. 2025. "Comparative Removal Properties of Sodium Magadiite and Its Protonic Form on Basic-Blue 41 from Contaminated Aqueous Solution" Inorganics 13, no. 9: 303. https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics13090303

APA Style

Alraddadi, T. S., Alam, M. G., Al-Faze, R., Popoola, S. A., Rakass, S., Oudghiri Hassani, H., & Kooli, F. (2025). Comparative Removal Properties of Sodium Magadiite and Its Protonic Form on Basic-Blue 41 from Contaminated Aqueous Solution. Inorganics, 13(9), 303. https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics13090303

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop