Next Article in Journal
Synthesis and Characterization of Extremely Bulky Aminopyridinate Ligands and a Series of Their Groups 1 and 2 Metal Complexes
Previous Article in Journal
Structural and Biological Comparative Studies on M(II)-Complexes (M = Co, Mn, Cu, Ni, Zn) of Hydrazone-s-Triazine Ligand Bearing Pyridyl Arm
Previous Article in Special Issue
Anion and Cation Dynamics in Mixed-Anion Hydroborate Na3(BH4)(B12H12): 1H, 11B, and 23Na NMR Studies
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Structural Evolution of Olivine during Mechanochemically Assisted Mineral Carbonation under CO2 Flow

Dipartimento di Scienze Chimiche, Fisiche, Matematiche e Naturali, Università degli Studi di Sassari, Via Vienna 2, 07100 Sassari, Italy
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Inorganics 2024, 12(10), 269; https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics12100269
Submission received: 23 August 2024 / Revised: 5 October 2024 / Accepted: 11 October 2024 / Published: 15 October 2024

Abstract

:
The mechanism of the mechanically assisted mineral carbonation of commercial olivine under the flow of a carbon dioxide (CO2)/nitrogen (N2) mixture has been elucidated by ex situ powder X-ray diffraction and Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy. The overall CO2 conversion depends on the rotational frequency of the mill’s engine, and it reaches 85% within 90 min of mechanical treatment at a flow rate of 2.5 L min−1. By tuning the frequency of rotation, the kinetics of CO2 conversion unveil a complex reaction pathway involving subsequent steps. Structural analyses suggest that clinochlore, a magnesium (Mg-)- and iron (Fe-)-containing aluminosilicate gathered among the components of olivine, is formed and consumed in different stages, thus promoting the CO2 sequestration that eventually results in the formation of hydrated and anhydrous Mg-based carbonates.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The unceasing production of anthropogenic carbon dioxide (CO2) has been raising serious concerns among the scientific community. Since the signing of the Kyoto Protocol in 1997, tight policies have been implemented in order to decrease the amount of CO2 generated from industrial processes and domestic activities, as well as to reduce the overall CO2 concentration in the atmosphere, whose value above 420 ppm is targeted to play a role in global warming and climate change [1]. In this scenario, “carbon capture, utilization, and storage” (CCUS) encompasses the set of activities in the fields of basic science, technology development, regulatory affairs, etc., aimed at subtracting CO2 from the atmosphere by permanent confinement through the implementation of physical, chemical, and biological CO2 fixation/conversion, as well as developing processes with a zero net impact of CO2 by directly capturing the CO2 when it is produced [2,3]. Indeed, the release of CO2 into the atmosphere primarily occurs from specific sources, including thermoelectric plants, foundries, cement factories, and so on. This category of CO2, known as “capturable CO2”, is emitted near its production source, making it more manageable to trap using targeted technologies [4]. Among these, the postcombustion approach involves CO2 captured from the exhaust gases of the combustion process, and it is the most promising sequestration route, as it comes just after the process that produces CO2 [5,6]. The concentration of CO2 in exhaust gases is typically between 4–14 v/v%, with unfavorable conditions for gas separation at atmospheric pressure [7]. In these operating modes, the denitrified and desulphurized CO2 reacts with liquid, such as MEA (monoethanolamine), the only widely used and established commercial solution, or filtered by specially designed membranes, raising concerns about the whole environmental sustainability of the process [8]. A more viable alternative to removing CO2 being considered now is the so-called mineralization of CO2, i.e., its transformation into carbonates of alkaline and alkaline earth metals starting from mafic and ultramafic minerals, as well as metal oxides or hydroxides [9,10]. Among the minerals, olivine, serpentine, talc, and basalt are some of those investigated that have gained wide attention due to their low cost and large availability. In particular, olivine is an abundant mineral in the earth’s crust (>50% by upper mantle volume), commonly found in mafic igneous rocks [11]. The mineralization process using Ca-Mg-Fe natural silicates was proposed in the pioneering reports of Seifritz [12] and Lackner [13], mimicking the phenomenon that naturally happens as described above. The whole set of reaction schemes accompanying CO2 mineralization is quite complex, and it is well known in the literature [8,12]. For the sake of brevity, two main processes can be considered: (i) serpentinization of olivine, a redox process involving Fe2+ oxidation and H2O reduction, which leads to the serpentine formation, flanked, in the presence of CO2 by (ii) carbonate precipitation via exchange reaction and possibly a Sabatier-type CO2 hydrogenation, according to the following scheme:
6 ( M g , F e ) 2 S i O 4 + 12 H 2 O + 6 C O 2 2 ( M g , F e ) 3 S i 2 O 5 ( O H ) 4 + 2 F e 3 O 4 + 8 H 2 + 6 M g C O 3 + 2 S i O 2
Moreover, serpentine itself could undergo mineral carbonation, according to the reaction below:
( M g , F e ) 3 S i 2 O 5 ( O H ) 4 + 3 C O 2 3 ( M g , F e ) C O 3 + 2 S i O 2 + 2 H 2 O
In summary, metal carbonate may be formed at the expense of corresponding silicates or of other metal precursors, and these reactions can occur in parallel with metal oxidation, hydrogen (H2) evolution, and CO2 reduction processes. However, the natural process occurs with slow kinetics that limit its feasibility for large-scale purposes. Despite this main hurdle, several methods have been studied to increase the reaction rate of silicates in carbonation, such as chemical and electrochemical activation [14], thermal activation [15], the use of additives in the reaction fluid with high temperatures and pressures [16], or mechanochemical activation [16,17]. Thermal activation leads to dehydrating hydrosilicates, such as serpentine minerals, but is ineffective on olivine [15]. Chemical activation allows for the removal of metal cations from silicates but involves a high additional cost for the disposal of hazardous acid sludge [18]. On the other hand, mechanical activation reduces the average size of the crystallites with a corresponding increase in the surface area and, eventually, in the active–reactive sites of the silicate. Moreover, it allows fast leaching of divalent cations gathered in silicate phases, avoiding the need for further chemicals, thus providing more efficient routes [19]. Even though this technique is energy-demanding, it could become effective if integrated with pre-existing processes [20,21]. In this regard, mechanical milling, with repeated fracturing on the reagent powders, would induce structural defects in materials, reduce the average size of mineral grains, and expose new active surfaces in the reaction environment [22]. Mechanochemical treatment was found to be an effective way to enhance the reactivity of natural silicates [23,24], and several reports [11,17,25,26] have highlighted how the microstructural parameter and texture properties were influenced by the type of grinding, grinding duration, and the presence of liquid, such as water or ethanol. A further step forward was taken by highlighting that grinding natural silicates (such as forsterite, serpentine, and wollastonite) in the presence of CO2 (reactive milling, RM) [27] promoted mechanochemical absorption of CO2 in the form of metal carbonate. More recently, studies based on the mechanical treatment of olivine minerals conducted by our research group [28,29] have highlighted effective CO2 mechanosorption on silicates, although in batch conditions (under static CO2 atmosphere). Nonetheless, there are no applications for mechanochemically activated processes carried out in a continuous-gas-feeding mode. This work aims to study the behavior of olivine as a solid-state CO2 store in flow conditions, driven by mechanochemical activation, thus simulating a mechanochemically induced process of postcombustion CO2 capture and transformation, ideally applicable to an industrial process that continuously emits CO2. Moreover, the conversion process is investigated by a structural characterization to gain more insight into the carbonation process in dynamic conditions.

2. Results and Discussion

Figure 1 showcases the P-XRD performed on the pristine olivine sample. From the profile matching and further Rietveld refinement, it arises that the commercial olivine is mainly constituted by a Mg-based nesosilicate with some Fe inclusion, namely forsterite (~92.5 wt.%), flanked by an inosilicate, ferrous enstatite (~5 wt.%), and clinochlore (~2.5 wt.%). The forsterite, crystallizing in an orthorhombic space group, Pbnm, features isolated SiO4 tetrahedra pointing in opposite directions along the c-axis. The tetrahedra are only connected to MO6-distorted octahedra by oxygen corner sharing. The central atom of these octahedra, which are usually labeled in literature as the M2 coordination sites, is the metallic bivalent cation, which could be both Mg2+ and Fe2+. The other octahedral site for cation, namely M1, is less distorted and connects two M2 octahedra along the b-axis, creating a tetrahedral interstitial site whose fourth face is shared with the SiO4 tetrahedron.
Enstatite crystallizes in the orthorhombic Pbca space group, and its structure showcases a series of edge-sharing SiO4 tetrahedra, which indefinitely creates chains along the c-axis. These chains are perpendicularly connected to the layers in which Mg2+ and Fe2+ randomly sit in both regular octahedral and distorted octahedral sites, whose coordination distance for the latter with the farthest O atoms exceeds 2.5 Å.
Lastly, clinochlore crystallizes in a triclinic space group, P 1 ¯ . Using the c-axis as a guide, its structure is constituted by two layers of isolated SiO4 tetrahedra, oriented in opposite directions, which share three edge O atoms with an inner layer of octahedra, whose center mainly hosts Al3+ atoms. Due to the strong Si-O bonds, these three layers are tightly bonded. The remaining O in each of the SiO4 groups in both layers is shared with octahedra belonging to the so-called brucite layer [30], which is constituted by more distorted octahedra that host in their centers, Mg2+, Fe2+, or Al3+ connected to O-H groups. The brucite layer is less tightly bonded to the three T-O-T group of layers previously described. Therefore, the overall hardness of the mineral is considerably lower than that of both forsterite and enstatite [31]. A more comprehensive structural description of the crystallographic phases found in the olivine is gathered in the Table 1, below.
Some morphology hints have been gained by SEM analyses: the images presented in Figure 2 reveal that olivine is constituted of a homogeneous distribution of millimetric and submillimetric particles with no regular shape. More interestingly, EDX analyses further confirm the presence of the typical elements that constitute the crystallographic phases listed above. In particular, Fe distribution fairly overlaps those of both Si and O, validating the presence of Fe in the main component of the olivine, i.e., the forsterite.
Figure 3 showcases the comparison of the CO2 conversion kinetics over olivine treated at different rotational frequencies of the mill. Regardless of the speed, the increase in the CO2 conversion over time is noticeable. The overall processes appear to not be linear, albeit for the first 30 min of reactive milling, a quasi-constant, steep increase in the conversion is visible. Indeed, after this period, a sudden change in the conversion behavior is witnessed by the appearance of a plateau, which interestingly lasts longer as the rpm of the mill decreases. Subsequently, a new steep increase in conversion happens, followed by a second and eventually a third steady region that sets the maximum value of CO2 conversion. In particular, the reaction carried out at 1000 rpm (red curve in Figure 3) reaches 85% of CO2 conversion, which remains stable within the further monitored time interval.
By varying the rpm of the mixer/mill engine, is it possible to tune the frequency of the impacts between the milling spheres and the reagents and, eventually, the mechanical energy transferred during each impact per unit of time [32,33]. The variation in these two parameters occurs simultaneously with the increase in the rpm value and defines the intensity of mechanical treatment. The trends shown in Figure 3 comply with composite reaction mechanisms involving solid–gas interactions, regardless of the activation method (thermal, mechanical, etc.). Indeed, several elementary steps characterize these reactions, i.e., physical and chemical adsorption of gases, diffusion, dissociation, and conversion phenomena [34,35]. In particular, these mechanisms have been highlighted in various mechanochemically activated heterogeneous processes [36], such as the hydrogenation of CO2 [37] or CO on metal oxide catalysts [38,39]. In the latter, beyond the dependency on the chemical system, the reactivity is driven by the conditions of the mechanical treatment [28,40,41]. This evidence has also been confirmed by the present study, in which the reduction in the rotation frequency unveils a multistep process for CO2 conversion upon olivine. Since the final conversion value within the observation time interval (180 min) increases with the rpm value, and the shape and extent of the intermediate plateau appear to be more pronounced as the rpm value decreases (particularly at 745 rpm; see the green curve in Figure 3), it is worth gaining more insight into the reaction mechanism by exploring the possible relations between crystallographic phase evolutions and the kinetics of the solid–gas reaction.
Therefore, the phase evolution during the mechanical reaction carried out at 745 rpm was followed by ex situ P-XRD at subsequent milling times up to the end of the process, i.e., 180 min. The results, gathered in Figure 4 and detailed in Table 1, reveal the formation, yet at the earliest stages of milling of a hydrated Mg-based carbonate phase, i.e., nesquehonite, MgCO3⋅3H2O, and, subsequently, the crystallization of the anhydrous carbonate, magnesite, MgCO3, accompanied by variations of a few relative percentage points in clinochlore relative abundance. In particular, for milling times lying on the plateaus, the clinochlore slightly decreases but is partly reformed at the end of each steep region (i.e., 140 and 180 min), whereas nesquehonite reaches its maximum during the first, longest plateau, reaching the value of almost 1 wt.% up to 60 min. The formation of these carbonate phases complies with the serpentinisation process [42] involving the oxidation of Fe2+ to Fe3+. Nesquehonite could be formed yet at room temperature with a slight CO2 overpressure, and its conversion to magnesite occurs at a slightly higher temperature (around 90 °C) [43], which is a condition that can be locally achieved during a high-energy ball-milling. Indeed, mechanical milling has proven to be effective in various systems containing iron in order to trigger reactivity, leading to solid solutions in binary systems, as well as to promote cationic substitution in ionic compounds [39,44]. Fe3+ can be included in a substitutional form in the sites of the Al3+ species in clinochlore, as reported in studies on the products of metamorphism of mafic rocks, which lead to the formation of minerals such as serpentines and chlorites [45]. Likewise, as already observed in the literature, the fixation of carbonate-based species is promoted by the basic environment arising from the minerals gathered in the olivine and is therefore responsible for the CO2 chemical sequestration reported in Figure 3.
Table 1. Cell parameters and relative abundance of the crystallographic phases obtained from Rietveld refinement on P-XRD patterns collected at subsequent milling stages, as well as the parameter Rwp%, which represents the weight ratio of the difference between the observed pattern and the XRD calculation [46].
Table 1. Cell parameters and relative abundance of the crystallographic phases obtained from Rietveld refinement on P-XRD patterns collected at subsequent milling stages, as well as the parameter Rwp%, which represents the weight ratio of the difference between the observed pattern and the XRD calculation [46].
← SamplePhase name →Forsterite FerroanEnstatite FerrousClinochloreNesquehoniteMagnesiteIron
Formula →Mg1.8Fe0.2SiO4Mg0.8Fe0.2SiO3(Mg,Fe(II))5Al(Si3Al)
O10(OH)8
MgCO3·3H2OMgCO3α-Fe
Sp. GroupPbnmPbcaP 1 ¯ P21c R 3 ¯ c I m 3 ¯ m
Pristinea (Å)4.7618.265.15α = 93.95
b (Å)10.228.839.58β = 95.60
c (Å)5.995.2014.42γ = 89.58
Weight %92.55.02.5
Rwp %11.43
2 min BMa (Å)4.7618.255.38α = 91.557.70
b (Å)10.228.839.52β = 102.245.37β = 89.99
c (Å)5.995.1914.63γ = 88.6712.11
Weight %91.04.43.41.1
Rwp %11.59
20 min BMa (Å)4.7618.265.40α = 92.217.705.03
b (Å)10.228.839.52β = 101.715.38β = 90.01
c (Å)5.995.1914.61γ = 88.9112.0917.95
Weight %91.15.22.90.40.20.2
Rwp %11.57
60 min BMa (Å)4.7618.265.32α = 93.247.715.052.86
b (Å)10.228.849.54β = 99.995.36β = 90.31
c (Å)5.995.1914.55γ = 91.4712.1017.85
Weight %90.46.01.80.90.20.6
Rwp %11.34
90 min BMa (Å)4.7618.265.34α = 90.687.745.052.86
b (Å)10.228.849.39β = 98.115.36β = 90.71
c (Å)5.995.1914.47γ = 92.0112.1017.85
Weight %90.66.51.80.30.20.6
Rwp %9.66
140 min BM a (Å)4.7618.265.42α = 91.677.735.432.87
b (Å)10.228.829.43β = 101.795.36β = 89.64
c (Å)5.995.2114.60γ = 88.3712.0216.62
Weight %90.75.62.30.30.10.9
Rwp %11.90
180 min BMa (Å)4.7618.265.42α = 91.697.365.412.86
b (Å)10.228.829.42β = 101.755.52β = 90.78
c (Å)5.995.2514.60γ = 88.3511.716.79
Weight %88.86.32.40.40.21.8
Rwp %10.62
In some of the patterns, the phase identification procedure also allowed for the identification of α-Fe, whose source could be likely the contamination from the stainless-steel jar.
The interpretation of the diffraction data of such a multiphase system, characterized by a high number of Bragg reflections over the entire explored 2θ angular range, is not straightforward, given that the precipitation of crystalline carbonates likely occurs at the surface of the particles, and the further milling action hampers the continuous enlargement and growth of crystalline phases, while favoring the occurrence of metastable conditions. Moreover, even though the data reported in Figure 3 may suggest a discrepancy between the conversion values and the amount of carbon sequestered in the form of mineral carbonates (Table 1), the comparison of the absolute amounts of involved chemical systems seems to clarify the point under the approximation of the ideal behavior of the gas. The absolute CO2 amount fed into the mechanochemical reactor within the time interval that was investigated, 180 min, approaches 1.84 mmoles, and the amount of converted CO2, which can be roughly estimated according to the reported kinetic trend, approaches 1.30 mmoles. The mass of reactant olivine, considering the lightest phase in the solid mixture, Forsterite, as a whole, is about 13.6 mmoles, which means that the ratio between CO2 converted molecules and olivine units is less than 1/10, and the maximum amount of carbonate phase which might be obtained is less than 10% v/v. It is then clear that the overall amounts of crystalline clinochlore and carbonates represent only a small fraction of the whole solid mixture at the end of each run (see Table 1), also taking into account that a fraction of carbon-based compounds may still occur in metastable phases, whose amount corresponds to the complement to the crystalline phases estimated by Rietveld method. Lastly, it should be pointed out that, according to the reaction scheme gathered in the Introduction section, CO2 reduction processes can also take place during milling, thus affecting the stoichiometry of the reaction by reducing the available carbon for carbonate precipitation. The quantification of these phases is beyond the scope of this paper and will be thoroughly assessed in further communications. Nonetheless, given that the relatively low percentages of carbonate-based phases (less than 2 wt.%) are fairly close to the quantification limit of Rietveld refinement, the validation of the proposed conversion mechanism arises from FT-IR measurements, which were carried out on the powders treated for different grinding times (Figure 5)”.
Indeed, the first carbonate phase found, after just 2 min of reactive grinding, is nesquehonite, identified by the three characteristic bands whose wavenumbers can be found at approximately 1518, 1478, and 1430 cm−1, respectively. These signals also persist in the ground sample for 20 and 60 min. Once the milling time surpasses 60 min, it is possible to notice the conversion from hydrated Mg carbonate to the related anhydrous magnesite (MgCO3), whose presence can be witnessed until the end of the experimental observation. More in detail, the signals falling in that region correspond to the bond vibrations of CO32− groups, as reported in the literature [47]. Specifically, for the analyzed samples, two characteristic bands are observed at 1423.9 and 1484.3 cm−1, attributable to the stretching of the carbonate group of the magnesite, confirming the formation of the metallic carbonates as a consequence of the mechanical treatment. In addition, the signals at approximately 3400 cm−1 and 1680 cm−1 are attributable to the stretching of O-H groups and to the bending of H2O, respectively [48]. The continuous CO2 reaction at the surface of the olivine further consumes H2O, which is progressively removed from the environment of the reaction and thus also drained from the freshly formed nesquehonite [42].
Lastly, in order to assess the possible direct effect of the high-energy grinding on the reactivity of the crystallographic phases that compose olivine and eventually untangle it from the transformations due to the reactivity towards CO2, a series of mechanical treatments were performed under argon (Ar) atmosphere on olivine fresh samples for increasing milling time, ranging from 1 to 10 h, operating at 750 rpm (Figure 6 and Table 2).
From 1 to 3 h of milling time, no qualitative difference can be observed with respect to the pristine sample; indeed, the three phases composing olivine can be found, i.e., forsterite, enstatite, and clinochlore. Nonetheless, slight changes in their relative abundance are noticeable from Rietveld refinement due to the partial loss of crystallinity induced by the mechanical grinding (Table 2). For further milling time, from 3 to 10 h, the contribution of the clinochlore phase to the pattern is lost. This could be due to a further amorphization that can be noticed in the amorphous shoulder at low scattering angles that eventually hides the presence of clinochlore. It is worth noting that, conversely, the Bragg reflections belonging to clinochlore are clearly visible after 3 h of milling under CO2 reactive flow (see Figure 4). Moreover, the Bragg reflections ascribed to the enstatite widen, whereas the signals belonging to the forsterite remain narrow, even up to 10 h of mechanical grinding (Figure 6). This evidence demonstrates that the observed process of mineral carbonation is only driven by the presence of CO2 in the reactor, since the mechanochemical treatment of olivine under inert atmosphere did not promote any further chemical reaction or phase transformation but only a partial amorphization and a slight loss of crystallinity, as above described. More likely, high-energy ball-milling promotes CO2 conversion by fracturing particles, thus exposing fresh surfaces in which solid–gas reactions can further take place. Lastly, the formation of clinochlore and H2, according to the redox reaction reported above, in the presence of CO2, allows for the production of light hydrocarbons, as revealed by the gas chromatograph output data, as could be expected by considering the results obtained in batch conditions [28]. Nevertheless, the different conditions of reactions (batch vs. flow) could impact the kinetics and the production of H2 and light hydrocarbons, which will be the object of further investigations by our research group.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Synthesis

Commercial olivine was provided by SATEF-HA S.p.A (Vicenza, Italy), and it was employed for CO2 mechanochemical conversion without any further pretreatment. The experimental setup, shown in Figure 7, and reported in more detail elsewhere [49], consisted of a prototype steel reactor for ball-milling, equipped with gas transfer lines, connected upstream to the CO2/N2 reaction mixture tank and downstream to a gas-chromatograph (GC). The feed gas flow into the mechanochemical reactor was tuned by a mass flow controller. The GC was equipped with a GS-Q column and both hot wire and flame ionization detectors, HWD and FID, respectively, using He as carrier gas. A gas sampling valve, possessing a volume of 0.5 mL for typically 2 g of olivine and 0.3 mL of deionized water (silicate:H2O = 6.67:1 weight ratio), was placed inside a stainless-steel mechanochemical reactor together with three spheres of 3.7 g each, made by the same material. The reactor (vessel), packaged in air, was inserted into the mixer clamp of a commercial 8000 Mixer/Mill, Spex SamplePrep (Metuchem, NJ, USA). The mill was customized in order to tune the engine rotational frequency; in particular, 745, 875, and 1000 rpm were selected for this work.

3.2. Reactant Gas Mixture: Setup

The reactant gas mixture consisted of 10% CO2 (purity = 99.995%), balanced in N2. First, the reaction chamber was saturated by flowing 20 mL min−1 of the reagent gas mixture for 1 h to remove air. Subsequently, the feed gas flow, kept at atmospheric pressure, was set to the nominal value of interest (typically 2.5 mL min−1) before the reaction started. The reactor was directly connected to the gas sampling valve of the GC, whose loop volume was 0.5 mL. Gas sampling was then performed at selected time intervals, usually 5 min. In order to monitor the disappearance of CO2 during the mechanically activated process, its initial concentration was determined by averaging 10 samplings collected during 1 h, which is considered a blank. As a general procedure, the GC gas analyses of the reactant and product gaseous mixture were performed at selected times once the mechanochemical process started: the first gas sampling was carried out after 1 min, and the subsequent ones were collected at regular steps of 5 min for at least 3 h of monitoring.

3.3. Percentage Conversion of CO2

This parameter indicates the rate of CO2 transformation compared with that initially present:
% C O 2 c o n v e r s i o n = [ C O 2 ] i [ C O 2 ] G C [ C O 2 ] i × 100
where [CO2]i and [CO2]GC are the initial and measured CO2 concentration expressed in v/v%, respectively.
Considering that the CO2 concentration evaluated at the GC will be equal to
C O 2 = f r · C O 2   A r e a
where “fr” is the response factor of the GC-column for CO2 and “CO2 Area” is the area of the integrated CO2 signal in the chromatogram, the equation to calculate the CO2 conversion rate can be rewritten as follows:
% C O 2 c o n v e r s i o n = C O 2   A r e a i C O 2   A r e a G C C O 2   A r e a i × 100

3.4. Assessment of Phase Evolution during Reactive Milling

Structural characterization was performed on both pristine and reacted samples by powder X-ray diffraction (P-XRD). The analyses were performed using a Smart Lab (Rigaku) diffractometer equipped with a Cu rotating anode in a Bragg–Brentano geometry. The P-XRD patterns were collected, setting a step size of 0.05° and a dwell time of 4 s per point. The identification of the crystallographic phases of the pristine olivine and of the formed products was performed using the software Xpert Highscore v. 1.0b (Philips Analytical B.V., Almelo, The Netherlands). Crystallographic index files (CIFs) were taken from the Crystallographic Open Database (COD) [50]. The relative abundance of the crystallographic phases in the samples, as well as their microstructural parameters, was obtained by Rietveld refinement performed using the software MAUD v. 2.999 [51]. In order to gather greater insight into the reacting mechanism of the CO2 mineralization, ex situ P-XRD at selected milling time was also performed; in particular, in order to avoid any gas contamination or changes in reactant mixture or in the mass-to-powder weight ratio, six different runs were carried out, each one corresponding to a milling time indicated in Figure 4. P-XRD patterns were then analyzed according to the protocols described above. To further corroborate the results of the P-XRD analyses, the evolution of the crystallographic phases as a function of the milling time was flanked by infrared spectroscopy analyses. Spectra of the olivine samples were collected through a Fourier Transform FT-IR 480 Plus Spectrometer (Jasco, Easton, MD, USA) in the wavenumber region ranging from 4000 to 500 cm−1. Microstructural characterization and elementary analysis of the olivine samples were performed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) using a Quanta 200 microscope (FEI, Hillsboro, OR, USA) equipped with an energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDAX) detector (Ametek, Inc. Berwyn, PA, USA).

4. Conclusions

The kinetic profiles showcased by the reactions carried out at different rotational frequencies of the mill reveal that the CO2 conversion process studied here cannot be described by a straightforward path. Indeed, changing the rotational frequency during the mechanochemically driven CO2 conversion allowed us to unveil a more complex reaction mechanism that occurs through subsequent stages, whose features depend on the conditions of the mechanical treatment. The final conversion value within the observation time interval (180 min) increases with the rpm, while the shape and extent of the intermediate plateau appear to be more pronounced as the rpm decreases. This evolution suggests that the reaction rate of the CO2 conversion lies on repeated formations and conversions of clinochlore, which act as a trigger for the reaction that eventually leads to the precipitation of carbonate phases, in agreement with the schemes reported in the Introduction section. The peculiar reactivity of clinochlore might be ascribed to its mechanical properties. Indeed, unless metallic cations (Mg2+ and Fe2+) needed for the formation of the carbonate phases are potentially available in all the phases gathered in the olivine, the relative softness of clinochlore (2–3 in the Mohs scale of hardness) compared with those of both forsterite and enstatite (6–7) might explain its enhanced reactivity under mechanical treatment. The repeated energy transfer due to the milling likely induces fractures in olivine where the softest component is present, thus exposing preferentially clinochlore to the incoming CO2. Moreover, the magnesium carbonates, observed after the CO2 conversion, arise from the Mg-containing brucite layers of clinochlore, the latter being loosely bonded to the aluminosilicate ones, therefore confirming the proposed topological description of the solid–gas reaction. Nonetheless, crystalline carbonate phases are not the only product of CO2 conversion: the formation of light hydrocarbons, resulting from CO2 reduction pathways, was also witnessed by GC analyses, showcased by the same mechanochemically driven reaction under batch conditions [28]. Investigations are ongoing to correlate the kinetics of CO2 sequestration with the distribution of gaseous products, with the aim to further shed light on the complex mechanism behind mineral carbonation under flow conditions.

5. Patents

  • Method for Converting Carbon Dioxide into High Added Value Chemical Compounds through a Mechanochemical Process under Continuous Gas Flow Conditions Int. Patent WO/2022200941 A1 2022
  • Process for the Conversion of Carbon Dioxide into Value-Added Products by Means of a Process of Mechanochemical Activation of Industrial Processing Scraps Int. Patent WO/2023199254 A9 2023

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, F.M., C.C., A.T. and G.M. (Gabriele Mulas); methodology, S.E. and G.M. (Gabriele Mulas); software, F.M., L.C., S.E. and S.G.; validation, S.E., S.G., F.M. and G.M. (Gabriele Mulas); formal analysis, A.T., C.C., F.M., L.C., S.E. and G.M. (Gabriele Mulas); investigation, C.C., A.T. and G.M. (Gabriele Masia); data curation, C.C. and A.T.; writing—original draft preparation, A.T.; writing—review and editing, C.C., A.T. and G.M. (Gabriele Masia), L.C., S.E., S.G., F.M. and G.M. (Gabriele Mulas); funding acquisition, S.G. and G.M. (Gabriele Mulas). All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The work has been funded by the resources of the “Fondazione di Sardegna” 2022 and 2023. This work has also been developed within the framework of the project e.INS- Ecosystem of Innovation for Next Generation Sardinia (cod. ECS 00000038) funded by the Italian Ministry for Research and Education (MUR) under the National Recovery and Resilience Plan (NRRP)—MISSION 4 COMPONENT 2, “From research to business” INVESTMENT 1.5, “Creation and strengthening of Ecosystems of innovation” and construction of “Territorial R&D Leaders”.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Acknowledgments

The authors deeply acknowledge Radovan Černý for fruitful discussions.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Busca, G. Critical Aspects of Energetic Transition Technologies and the Roles of Materials Chemistry and Engineering. Energies 2024, 17, 3565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Zhang, Z.; Wang, T.; Blunt, M.J.; Anthony, E.J.; Park, A.H.A.; Hughes, R.W.; Webley, P.A.; Yan, J. Advances in Carbon Capture, Utilization and Storage. Appl. Energy 2020, 278, 115627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Wei, R.; Alshahrani, T.; Chen, B.; Ibragimov, A.B.; Xu, H.; Gao, J. Advances in Porous Materials for Efficient Separation and Purification of Flue Gas. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2024, 352, 128238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Dubey, A.; Arora, A. Advancements in Carbon Capture Technologies: A Review. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 373, 133932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Liu, W.; Ji, Y.; Huang, Y.; Zhang, X.J.; Wang, T.; Fang, M.X.; Jiang, L. Adsorption-Based Post-Combustion Carbon Capture Assisted by Synergetic Heating and Cooling. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2024, 191, 114141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Bukar, A.M.; Asif, M. Technology Readiness Level Assessment of Carbon Capture and Storage Technologies. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2024, 200, 114578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Songolzadeh, M.; Soleimani, M.; Takht Ravanchi, M.; Songolzadeh, R. Carbon Dioxide Separation from Flue Gases: A Technological Review Emphasizing Reduction in Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Sci. World J. 2014, 2014, 828131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Dziejarski, B.; Krzyżyńska, R.; Andersson, K. Current Status of Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage Technologies in the Global Economy: A Survey of Technical Assessment. Fuel 2023, 342, 127776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Sanna, A.; Uibu, M.; Caramanna, G.; Kuusik, R.; Maroto-Valer, M.M. A Review of Mineral Carbonation Technologies to Sequester CO2. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43, 8049–8080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Cao, X.; Li, Q.; Xu, L.; Tan, Y. A Review of in Situ Carbon Mineralization in Basalt. J. Rock Mech. Geotech. Eng. 2024, 16, 1467–1485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Li, J.; Hitch, M. Structural and Chemical Changes in Mine Waste Mechanically-Activated in Various Milling Environments. Powder Technol. 2017, 308, 13–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Seifritz, W. CO2 Disposal by Means of Silicates. Nature 1990, 345, 486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Lackner, K.S.; Wendt, C.H.; Butt, D.P.; Joyce, E.L.; Sharp, D.H. Carbon Dioxide Disposal in Carbonate Minerals. Energy 1995, 20, 1153–1170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Vega, L.F.; Bahamon, D.; Alkhatib, I.I.I. Perspectives on Advancing Sustainable CO2 Conversion Processes: Trinomial Technology, Environment, and Economy. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2024, 12, 5357–5382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. McKelvy, M.J.; Chizmeshya, A.V.G.; Diefenbacher, J.; Béarat, H.; Wolf, G. Exploration of the Role of Heat Activation in Enhancing Serpentine Carbon Sequestration Reactions. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2004, 38, 6897–6903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. O’Connor, W.K.; Dahlin, D.C.; Rush, G.E.; Dahlin, C.L.; Collins, W.K. Carbon Dioxide Sequestration by Direct Mineral Carbonation: Process Mineralogy of Feed and Products. Min. Metall. Explor. 2002, 19, 95–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Haug, T.A.; Kleiv, R.A.; Munz, I.A. Investigating Dissolution of Mechanically Activated Olivine for Carbonation Purposes. Appl. Geochem. 2010, 25, 1547–1563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Azdarpour, A.; Asadullah, M.; Mohammadian, E.; Hamidi, H.; Junin, R.; Karaei, M.A. A Review on Carbon Dioxide Mineral Carbonation through PH-Swing Process. Chem. Eng. J. 2015, 279, 615–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Li, J.; Hitch, M. Economic Analysis on the Application of Mechanical Activation in an Integrated Mineral Carbonation Process. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2018, 128, 63–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Li, J.; Hitch, M. Ultra-Fine Grinding and Mechanical Activation of Mine Waste Rock Using a Planetary Mill for Mineral Carbonation. Int. J. Miner. Process. 2017, 158, 18–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Li, J.; Hitch, M. Mechanical Activation of Magnesium Silicates for Mineral Carbonation, a Review. Miner. Eng. 2018, 128, 69–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Baláž, P.; Turianicová, E.; Fabián, M.; Kleiv, R.A.; Briančin, J.; Obut, A. Structural Changes in Olivine (Mg, Fe)2SiO4 Mechanically Activated in High-Energy Mills. Int. J. Miner. Process. 2008, 88, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zhang, Q.; Sugiyama, K.; Saito, F. Enhancement of Acid Extraction of Magnesium and Silicon from Serpentine by Mechanochemical Treatment. Hydrometallurgy 1997, 45, 323–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Kalinkina, E.V.; Kalinkin, A.M.; Forsling, W.; Makarov, V.N. Sorption of Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide and Structural Changes of Ca and Mg Silicate Minerals during Grinding I. Diopside. Int. J. Miner. Process. 2001, 61, 273–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Kalinkin, A.M.; Kalinkina, E.V.; Politov, A.A.; Makarov, V.N.; Boldyrev, V.V. Mechanochemical Interaction of Ca Silicate and Aluminosilicate Minerals with Carbon Dioxide. J. Mater. Sci. 2004, 39, 5393–5398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Fabian, M.; Shopska, M.; Paneva, D.; Kadinov, G.; Kostova, N.; Turianicová, E.; Briančin, J.; Mitov, I.; Kleiv, R.A.; Baláž, P. The Influence of Attrition Milling on Carbon Dioxide Sequestration on Magnesium-Iron Silicate. Miner. Eng. 2010, 23, 616–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Bolm, C.; Hernández, J.G. Mechanochemistry of Gaseous Reactants. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 3285–3299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Farina, V.; Gamba, N.S.; Gennari, F.; Garroni, S.; Torre, F.; Taras, A.; Enzo, S.; Mulas, G. CO2 Hydrogenation Induced by Mechanochemical Activation of Olivine with Water Under CO2 Atmosphere. Front. Energy Res. 2019, 7, 107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Torre, F.; Farina, V.; Taras, A.; Pistidda, C.; Santoru, A.; Bednarcik, J.; Mulas, G.; Enzo, S.; Garroni, S. Room Temperature Hydrocarbon Generation in Olivine Powders: Effect of Mechanical Processing under CO2 Atmosphere. Powder Technol. 2020, 364, 915–923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Yang, M.; Ye, M.; Han, H.; Ren, G.; Han, L.; Zhang, Z. Near-Infrared Spectroscopic Study of Chlorite Minerals. J. Spectrosc. 2018, 2018, 6958260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Callister, W.D.; Rethwisch, D.G. Materials Science and Engineering: An Introduction, 8th ed.; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2010; ISBN 0470419970. [Google Scholar]
  32. Delogu, F.; Monagheddu, M.; Mulas, G.; Schiffini, L.; Cocco, G. Impact Characteristics and Mechanical Alloying Processes by Ball Milling: Experimental Evaluation and Modelling Outcomes. Int. J. Non-Equilib. Process. 2000, 11, 235–269. [Google Scholar]
  33. Napolitano, E.; Mulas, G.; Enzo, S.; Delogu, F. Kinetics of Mechanically Induced Anatase-to-Rutile Phase Transformations under Inelastic Impact Conditions. Acta Mater. 2010, 58, 3798–3804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Galwey, A.K.; Bettany, D.G.; Mortimer, M. Kinetic Compensation Effects Observed During Oxidation of Carbon Monoxide on γ-Alumina Supported Palladium, Platinum, and Rhodium Metal Catalysts: Toward a Mechanistic Explanation. Int. J. Chem. Kinet. 2006, 38, 689–702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Galwey, A.K. Solid State Reaction Kinetics, Mechanisms and Catalysis: A Retrospective Rational Review. React. Kinet. Mech. Catal. 2015, 114, 1–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Firsova, A.A.; Morozova, O.S.; Leonov, A.V.; Streletskii, A.N.; Korchak, V.N. Mechanochemical Synthesis of CuO-CeO2 Catalysts for the Preferential Oxidation of CO in the Presence of H2. Kinet. Catal. 2014, 55, 783–791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Li, K.; Chen, J.G. CO2 Hydrogenation to Methanol over ZrO2-Containing Catalysts: Insights into ZrO2 Induced Synergy. ACS Catal. 2019, 9, 7840–7861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Streletskii, A.N.; Morozova, O.S.; Berestetskaya, I.V.; Borunova, A.B.; Butyagin, P.J. Mechanochemical Reactions in Gas (H2, Co)/Solid (Zr, a-NiZr) Systems. Mater. Sci. Forum 1996, 225–227, 539–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Kalinkin, A.M.; Politov, A.A.; Boldyrev, V.V.; Kalinkina, E.V.; Makarov, V.N.; Kalinnikov, V.T. Mechanical Activation of Diopside in CO2. Inorg. Mater. 2002, 38, 163–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Mateti, S.; Chen, Y.; Sathikumar, G.; Han, Q.; Prasad, S.; Ferdowsi, R.G.; Battacharjee, A. A Mechanochemical Process to Capture and Separate Carbon Dioxide from Natural Gas Using Boron Nitride Nanosheets. Mater. Horizons 2024, 11, 2950–2956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Farina, V.; Simula, M.D.; Taras, A.; Cappai, L.; Sougrati, M.T.; Mulas, G.; Garroni, S.; Enzo, S.; Stievano, L. Unveiling Redox Mechanism at the Iron Centers in the Mechanochemically Activated Conversion of CO2 in the Presence of Olivine. J. Mater. Sci. 2022, 57, 10017–10027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Ugapeva, S.S.; Oleinikov, O.B.; Zayakina, N.V. Rare Hydrated Magnesium Carbonate Minerals Nesquehonite and Dypingite of the Obnazhennaya Kimberlite Pipe, in the Yakutian Kimberlite Province. Minerals 2023, 13, 1363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Ballirano, P.; De Vito, C.; Mignardi, S.; Ferrini, V. Phase Transitions in the Mg-CO2-H2O System and the Thermal Decomposition of Dypingite, Mg5(CO3)4(OH)25H2O: Implications for Geosequestration of Carbon Dioxide. Chem. Geol. 2013, 340, 59–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Enzo, S.; Mulas, G.; Frattini, R. The Structure of Mechanically Alloyed AlxFe(1-x) End-Products after Annealing. Mater. Sci. Forum 1998, 269–272, 385–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Masci, L.; Dubacq, B.; Verlaguet, A.; Chopin, C.; De Andrade, V.; Herviou, C. A XANES and EPMA Study of Fe3+ in Chlorite: Importance of Oxychlorite and Implications for Cation Site Distribution and Thermobarometry. Am. Mineral. 2019, 104, 403–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Toby, B.H. R Factors in Rietveld Analysis: How Good Is Good Enough? Powder Diffr. 2006, 21, 67–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Turianicová, E.; Baláž, P.; Tuček, Ľ.; Zorkovská, A.; Zeleňák, V.; Németh, Z.; Šatka, A.; Kováč, J. A Comparison of the Reactivity of Activated and Non-Activated Olivine with CO2. Int. J. Miner. Process. 2013, 123, 73–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Frost, R.L.; Palmer, S.J. Infrared and Infrared Emission Spectroscopy of Nesquehonite Mg(OH)(HCO3)·2H2O-Implications for the Formula of Nesquehonite. Spectrochim. Acta Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2011, 78, 1255–1260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Taras, A.; Farina, V.; Cappai, L.; Enzo, S.; Garroni, S.; Mulas, G. Method for Converting Carbon Dioxide into High Added Value Chemical Compounds Through a Mechanochemical Process under Continuous Gas Flow Conditions. U.S. Patent Application No. 18/551,953, 23 May 2024. [Google Scholar]
  50. Graulis, S.; Chateigner, D.; Downs, R.T.; Yokochi, A.F.T.; Quirós, M.; Lutterotti, L.; Manakova, E.; Butkus, J.; Moeck, P.; Le Bail, A. Crystallography Open Database—An Open-Access Collection of Crystal Structures. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2009, 42, 726–729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Lutterotti, L. Total Pattern Fitting for the Combined Size-Strain-Stress-Texture Determination in Thin Film Diffraction. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B Beam Interact. Mater. At. 2010, 268, 334–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (Top): P-XRD pattern of the pristine olivine. Rietveld refinement reveals that the main component is Mg1.8Fe0.2SiO4, forsterite, ~92.5 wt.%, followed by Mg0.8Fe0.2SiO3, ferrous enstatite, ~5 wt.%, and (Mg,Fe(II))5Al(Si3Al)O10(OH)8, clinochlore, ~2.5 wt.%. (Bottom): structural models of forsterite, enstatite, and clinochlore, indicated by (a), (b), and (c), respectively.
Figure 1. (Top): P-XRD pattern of the pristine olivine. Rietveld refinement reveals that the main component is Mg1.8Fe0.2SiO4, forsterite, ~92.5 wt.%, followed by Mg0.8Fe0.2SiO3, ferrous enstatite, ~5 wt.%, and (Mg,Fe(II))5Al(Si3Al)O10(OH)8, clinochlore, ~2.5 wt.%. (Bottom): structural models of forsterite, enstatite, and clinochlore, indicated by (a), (b), and (c), respectively.
Inorganics 12 00269 g001
Figure 2. (A): SEM micrography of pristine olivine particles, showing a narrow distribution of faceted micrometric particles ((B): detail of a selected particle) and EDX analysis showcasing a homogeneous distribution of O, Mg, Si, Al, and Fe, which are the main elements of the crystallographic phases composing olivine, flanked by some minor inclusions of Ca, Mn, and Ni.
Figure 2. (A): SEM micrography of pristine olivine particles, showing a narrow distribution of faceted micrometric particles ((B): detail of a selected particle) and EDX analysis showcasing a homogeneous distribution of O, Mg, Si, Al, and Fe, which are the main elements of the crystallographic phases composing olivine, flanked by some minor inclusions of Ca, Mn, and Ni.
Inorganics 12 00269 g002
Figure 3. CO2 conversion kinetics as a function of the grinding time. Milling conditions: continuous flow of CO2/N2 10:90, 2.5 mL min−1; rotational speed of the mill was set at 745 (green scatters), 875 (blue scatters), and 1000 rpm (red scatters). Dotted lines are added for the sake of clarity, and they are intended only to help follow the conversion trends at each of the rpms investigated. The highest CO2 conversion rate was reached after 40 min of milling at 1000 rpm (red scatters, 85% of injected CO2), remaining stable up to the end of the investigated timeframe.
Figure 3. CO2 conversion kinetics as a function of the grinding time. Milling conditions: continuous flow of CO2/N2 10:90, 2.5 mL min−1; rotational speed of the mill was set at 745 (green scatters), 875 (blue scatters), and 1000 rpm (red scatters). Dotted lines are added for the sake of clarity, and they are intended only to help follow the conversion trends at each of the rpms investigated. The highest CO2 conversion rate was reached after 40 min of milling at 1000 rpm (red scatters, 85% of injected CO2), remaining stable up to the end of the investigated timeframe.
Inorganics 12 00269 g003
Figure 4. From bottom to top: P-XRD analyses on pristine and reacted olivine at different milling times (745 rpm, 2.5 mL min−1 of mixture gas containing 10% v/v CO2).
Figure 4. From bottom to top: P-XRD analyses on pristine and reacted olivine at different milling times (745 rpm, 2.5 mL min−1 of mixture gas containing 10% v/v CO2).
Inorganics 12 00269 g004
Figure 5. FTIR analyses at different milling times (745 rpm, 10% v/v CO2 concentration, 2.5 mL min−1). Vibrations of the skeleton of the Si-O silicate matrix of olivine are also found, identifiable in the characteristic bands in the range 1000–500 cm−1.
Figure 5. FTIR analyses at different milling times (745 rpm, 10% v/v CO2 concentration, 2.5 mL min−1). Vibrations of the skeleton of the Si-O silicate matrix of olivine are also found, identifiable in the characteristic bands in the range 1000–500 cm−1.
Inorganics 12 00269 g005
Figure 6. XRD patterns (data points) and Rietveld refinement analyses (continuous lines) of olivine undergoing mechanical grinding in a commercial Spex-type mill for times increasing from 1 to 10 h.
Figure 6. XRD patterns (data points) and Rietveld refinement analyses (continuous lines) of olivine undergoing mechanical grinding in a commercial Spex-type mill for times increasing from 1 to 10 h.
Inorganics 12 00269 g006
Figure 7. Experimental setup for the mechanochemical process under continuous flow of reactive gas mixture.
Figure 7. Experimental setup for the mechanochemical process under continuous flow of reactive gas mixture.
Inorganics 12 00269 g007
Table 2. Structural and microstructural data from Rietveld refinement on olivine powders mechanically treated under Ar atmosphere. It is worth noting that by increasing the milling time (up to 10 h), a partial amorphization of the sample occurs; therefore, the overall weight % of the phases could not be 100. For the 5 h and 10 h samples, clinochlore as a crystalline phase was no longer observable.
Table 2. Structural and microstructural data from Rietveld refinement on olivine powders mechanically treated under Ar atmosphere. It is worth noting that by increasing the milling time (up to 10 h), a partial amorphization of the sample occurs; therefore, the overall weight % of the phases could not be 100. For the 5 h and 10 h samples, clinochlore as a crystalline phase was no longer observable.
← SamplePhase Name →Forsterite FerroanEnstatite FerrousClinochlore
Chemical formula →Mg1.8Fe0.2SiO4Mg0.8Fe0.2SiO3(Mg,Fe(II))5Al(Si3Al)O10(OH)8
Space group →PbnmPbcaP 1 ¯
1 h BMa (Å)4.7618.255.15
b (Å)10.228.839.58
c (Å)5.995.2014.42
Grain size (nm)10554123
Weight %93.74.02.3
Rwp %7.74
2 h BMa (Å)4.7618.255.13
b (Å)1.238.839.55
c (Å)5.995.2014.45
Grain size (nm)13469134
Weight %88.97.73.4
Rwp %8.17
3 h BMa (Å)4.7618.265.11
b (Å)10.228.839.59
c (Å)5.995.2014.47
Grain size (nm)12478121.15
Weight %88.88.31.7
Rwp %9.60
4 h BMa (Å)4.7618.265.10
b (Å)10.228.839.59
c (Å)5.995.2014.46
Grain size (nm)10979124
Weight %89.98.00.9
Rwp %7.79
5 h BMa (Å)4.7618.26-
b (Å)10.238.82-
c (Å)6.005.20-
Grain size (nm)8829-
Weight %88.710.3Not found
Rwp %9.38
10 h BMa (Å)4.7618.29-
b (Å)10.238.78-
c (Å)6.005.28-
Grain size (nm)7821-
Weight %85.414.6Not found
Rwp %8.71
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cau, C.; Taras, A.; Masia, G.; Caggiu, L.; Enzo, S.; Garroni, S.; Murgia, F.; Mulas, G. Structural Evolution of Olivine during Mechanochemically Assisted Mineral Carbonation under CO2 Flow. Inorganics 2024, 12, 269. https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics12100269

AMA Style

Cau C, Taras A, Masia G, Caggiu L, Enzo S, Garroni S, Murgia F, Mulas G. Structural Evolution of Olivine during Mechanochemically Assisted Mineral Carbonation under CO2 Flow. Inorganics. 2024; 12(10):269. https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics12100269

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cau, Costantino, Alessandro Taras, Gabriele Masia, Laura Caggiu, Stefano Enzo, Sebastiano Garroni, Fabrizio Murgia, and Gabriele Mulas. 2024. "Structural Evolution of Olivine during Mechanochemically Assisted Mineral Carbonation under CO2 Flow" Inorganics 12, no. 10: 269. https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics12100269

APA Style

Cau, C., Taras, A., Masia, G., Caggiu, L., Enzo, S., Garroni, S., Murgia, F., & Mulas, G. (2024). Structural Evolution of Olivine during Mechanochemically Assisted Mineral Carbonation under CO2 Flow. Inorganics, 12(10), 269. https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics12100269

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop