Next Article in Journal
Influence of Doping-Ion-Type on the Characteristics of Al2O3-Based Nanocomposites and Their Capabilities of Removing Indigo Carmine from Water
Next Article in Special Issue
Evaluating the Sorption Affinity of Low Specific Activity 99Mo on Different Metal Oxide Nanoparticles
Previous Article in Journal
High-Temperature Interactions of Silicon-Aluminum Oxynitrides (Sialons) with Sodium Fluoride
Previous Article in Special Issue
Changes in Structural, Morphological and Optical Features of Differently Synthetized C3N4-ZnO Heterostructures: An Experimental Approach
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Preparation, Microstructural Characterization and Photocatalysis Tests of V5+-Doped TiO2/WO3 Nanocomposites Supported on Electrospun Membranes

Inorganics 2022, 10(9), 143; https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics10090143
by Michel F. G. Pereira 1, Mayane M. Nascimento 1, Pedro Henrique N. Cardoso 1, Carlos Yure B. Oliveira 2, Ginetton F. Tavares 3 and Evando S. Araújo 1,*
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Inorganics 2022, 10(9), 143; https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics10090143
Submission received: 2 August 2022 / Revised: 8 September 2022 / Accepted: 14 September 2022 / Published: 19 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Advances into Nanostructured Oxides)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

My comments are in the attached file.

 

 

 

 

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

The responses to reviewers are listed in the attached file.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Pereira et al. presented an interesting manuscript on ?5+-doped ???2/??3 ??? nanostructures, describing both their preparation and application. The authors prepared three MMO samples - a mixture of T??2: ??3 (1:1 ) and a mixture of T??2: ??3 doped with different concentrations of V2O5, and presented a detailed analysis of the resulting structures using a number of techniques. In addition, Pereira et al. investigated the photocatalytic abilities of the resulting materials, using visible light photodegradation of Rhodamine B as an example. The submitted article is correct, and with minor corrections, I believe the article can be accepted for publication in the journal: Inorganics.

1. For photocatalytic testing, the authors used a continuous white light, with light output of 60W, located 30 cm from the reactor. Can the authors provide the type of light source? Did the authors measure the intensity of the light on the sample (reactor)? (Such a large distance of light from the sample causes additional effects, so it's hard to tell what light intensity was on the sample during the study).

2. In Figure 9, the authors compare the kinetics of photodegradation with MMO-loaded fibers. Can the authors explain the abbreviations used on the Y-axis in Figure 9 (C/C0)?

3.The authors stated: Especially, the increase in the doping level provided a lower pair recombination rate, as a consequence of the progressive decrease in the semiconductor band gap (as discussed previously) (line: 392-394). Although this statement is deduced from Figure 9, it would be helpful for a better description of the obtained results to quantify this recombination rate, by, for example, determining the slope of the curves presented in Figure 9 (one possibility is to determine dC/C0/dt, where d is the derivative). [The slope of the curve is directly proportional to the rate of degradation].

Author Response

The responses to reviewers are listed in the attached file.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

The authors addressed all my comments, and completed the recommended experimental work except one experiment; they claimed that the facility is not available in their lab. Thus, in my point of view, the manuscript is publishable in its current form.
Back to TopTop