Next Article in Journal
Hybrid Adaptive Bias OFDM-Based IM/DD Visible Light Communication System
Next Article in Special Issue
Asymmetric Concentric Microring Resonator Label-Free Biosensors
Previous Article in Journal
Towards Reduced CNNs for De-Noising Phase Images Corrupted with Speckle Noise
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

High-Q-Factor Tunable Silica-Based Microring Resonators

1
State Key Laboratory of Integrated Optoelectronics, College of Electronic Science and Engineering, Jilin University, Changchun 130012, China
2
National Laboratory of Solid State Microstructures and College of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China
3
State Key Laboratory of Integrated Optoelectronics, Institute of Semiconductors, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100083, China
4
Shijia Photons Technology, Hebi 458030, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Photonics 2021, 8(7), 256; https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics8070256
Submission received: 1 June 2021 / Revised: 22 June 2021 / Accepted: 1 July 2021 / Published: 4 July 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances of Silicon Photonics)

Abstract

:
A high-Q-factor tunable silica-based microring resonator (MRR) is demonstrated. To meet the critical-coupling condition, a Mach–Zehnder interferometer (MZI) as the tunable coupler was integrated with a racetrack resonator. Then, 40 mW electronic power was applied on the microheater on the arm of MZI, and a maximal notch depth of about 13.84 dB and a loaded Q factor of 4.47 × 106 were obtained. The proposed MRR shows great potential in practical application for optical communications and integrated optics.

1. Introduction

Owing to the compact footprint and functional versatility, optical microresonators have attracted much attention in many fields, including optical filters [1], sensors [2,3], and nonlinear optics [4]. Microresonator devices with a high Q factor were designed and demonstrated on different material platforms, such as silicon-on-insulator (SOI) [5,6,7], silicon nitride (SiN) [8,9,10], indium phosphide (InP)-based planar lightwave circuits (PLCs) [11,12,13], polymer-based PLCs [3,14,15], and silica-based PLCs [16]. Among them, benefitting from low loss, miniaturization, scalability, and high fiber-coupling efficiency, silica-based PLCs devices show great potential in optics integration and commercial field [17,18,19]. Whispering gallery mode (WGM)-based silica microtoroid resonators [20,21] with ultrahigh Q factors of >108 are used in frequency combs [22] and Brillouin lasers [23]. However, till now, silica-based high Q factor microring resonators (MRRs), a great candidate for optical interconnection and wavelength division multiplexing systems, have been less demonstrated [16]. To achieve high Q factor and notch depth, MRRs are designed to work under the critical-coupling condition. However, the critical-coupling condition cannot be easily achieved due to the possible deviation of the fabrication process. Replacing fixed directional couplers with tunable couplers is an efficient method to meet the critical-coupling condition [12,15,24,25]. In this paper, a high-Q-factor silica-based MRR was designed and is experimentally demonstrated. To obtain high-notch-depth MRRs, an MZI structure is used to replace the conventional directional coupler. The critical-coupling condition is satisfied by changing the coupling coefficient. The notch depth of the transmission from the through port can be tuned from 1.12 to 13.84 dB. Lastly, a high loaded Q factor of 4.47 × 106 was acquired, which means that the propagation loss of the waveguides was about 0.11 dB/cm.

2. Structure and Design

To realize the compact device, we designed the tunable MRRs on the basis of the 2% Δ silica-based PLC platform. Both the width and thickness of the waveguides were 4 μm to realize single-mode propagation [16]. The structure of the tunable MRRs is shown in Figure 1. We replaced the directional coupler by the MZI structure. The coupling coefficient of the MZI is charged with electrical power applied on the MZI arm.
To decrease bent loss, we chose radius R of the ring of 1600 μm. The length of the MZI arm was 3000 μm. Length L 1 of the two coupling regions of the MZI was 195 μm with a gap of 1.5 μm. Then, the gap was transferred from 1.5 to 127 μm using S-bent waveguides with a radius of 3000 μm. According to the MZI length, length L of the straight waveguide was 7250 μm. On the basis of coupled-mode theory (CMT) and the transfer-matrix technique (TMT) [26,27], the normalized amplitude-response function of the tunable ring resonator is expressed as
P = | E t 1 | 2 = α 2 + t 4 + κ 4 2 t 2 κ 2 cos ( Δ θ ) 2 α t 2 cos ( Δ θ ) + 2 α κ 2 cos ( Δ θ ) 1 + α 2 κ 4 + α 2 t 4 + 2 α κ 2 cos ( φ + Δ φ ) 2 α t 2 cos ( φ + Δ φ + Δ θ ) 2 α 2 t 2 κ 2 cos ( Δ θ )
where κ and t are the coupling and transmission coefficient of a single directional coupler with the relationship of κ 2 + t 2 = 1 ; is the loss coefficient of the ring (zero loss α = 1 ); φ = L c i r β is the phase shift caused by the ring waveguide, L c i r is the circumference of the ring, β = 2 π λ n e f f is the propagation constant with effective refractive index n e f f and wavelength λ ; Δ φ = L 2 2 π λ d n d T Δ T and Δ θ = L 2 2 π λ d n d T Δ T are the phase shift caused by microheaters on the ring waveguide and the arm of MZI, respectively; d n d T = 1.19 × 10 5 K 1 is the thermo-optic coefficient of SiO2; the same length L 2 and width of the microheaters on the ring waveguide and the MZI arm are 2600 and 21 μm.
On the basis of the propagation loss of the silica-based waveguide that we calculated [19], we chose waveguide loss 0.1 dB/cm to optimize the parameters of the racetrack MRR. To simplify the calculation, the MZI inside the racetrack was assumed to be a straight waveguide with L . Hence, circumference L c i r = 2 π R + 2 L was calculated as 2.455 cm. Then loss coefficient α was 0.9721. On the basis of Equation (1), we calculated the transmission of the tunable MRR through MATLAB. We changed the indices of the arm of the MZI and the ring waveguide under the microheaters to perform coupling-condition and resonator-wavelength tuning, respectively. Figure 2a shows the transmission with coupling-condition tuning. To perform the tunable effect, the MRR first worked in overcoupling condition with a κ of 0.5315 according to the design parameters. With the change in the temperature of the MZI arm, the coupling condition was changed. The deepest depth of 25.04 dB was obtained. An FSR of 65.50 pm and ~4 pm/K wavelength shift was also observed. Figure 2b shows the normalized transmission of the resonator peak in critical-coupling condition while the temperature changes of 14 K. The simulated data shown by the blue hollow circles were fit using the theoretical Lorentzian transmission in Origin (see the solid red curve). Full width at half maximum (FWHM) of the resonance peak of 1533.17 nm for the present resonator was about Δ λ = 0.0435   pm , which indicated that a loaded Q factor Qload of 3.52 × 107 was obtained. Figure 3 shows transmission with resonator wavelength tuning. A wavelength shift of ~4 pm/K is observed.

3. Fabrication and Measurement

The designed MRRs were fabricated by the PLC foundry, SHIJIA, China. The bottom cladding of ~15 μm was thermally oxidized on silicon substrate. A 4 μm thick core layer was fabricated through plasma-enhanced chemical-vapor deposition (PECVD). Then, the device was annealed above 1100 °C. We patterned the waveguides through ultraviolet (UV) lithography and fully etched the core layer by an inductively coupled plasma (ICP) dry-etching process with a C4F8/SF6 gas mixture. Next, the top cladding of ~15 μm was deposited by PECVD and again annealed. Lastly, microheaters were deposited by means of magnetron sputtering. Figure 4a shows the tunable MRR photograph. The cross-section of the core waveguide is shown in Figure 4b. The geometry of the core waveguide was not exactly a square due to the fabrication process, increasing propagation loss and slightly shifting the resonant wavelength. Both the width and thickness of the core waveguides were smaller than 4 μm, ensuring single-mode propagation.
Because of the polarization sensitivity of the microring resonator, polarization-maintaining fiber (PMF) was used to couple the input and output ends of the chip, which were fixed by ultraviolet (UV) glue. Wire bonding between the heaters and printed circuit boards (PCB) finalized the chip-assembly procedure. To measure the fabricated MRR, we used a swept-wavelength laser source (New Focus TLB-6600) that was tunable from 1510 to 1590 nm. The output signal of the MRR was detected by a photodetector (Thorlabs PDA10CS, 17 MHz bandwidth) associated with a data-acquisition card (DAQ, National Instruments USB-6366). The measured transmissions were normalized with respect to the transmission from laser source to photodetector. Owing to the present resonator having a high Q factor, the step size of the tunable laser source was set to be 0.03 pm.
Both coupling condition and resonant wavelength were tunable by applied electric power using source meter instruments (Keithley 2450) to the microheaters on the MZI arm and the ring waveguide, respectively. As shown in Figure 5a, the extinction ratio (ER) of the MRR could be tuned by the applied power corresponding to the coupling coefficient tuning of the MZI-based coupler. The insertion loss (IL) of our MRR chip was ~3.72 dB, including the coupling loss between the fibers and the waveguides, and the insertion loss of the tunable MRR. At the beginning, the ring resonator was working at the overcoupling condition, as most of the light in the input waveguide was coupled into the ring resonator after passing the MZI. Hence, a shallow dip of around ~1.12 dB was observed. The light coupled into the ring resonator was decreased by increasing the applied power. When this coupled energy was equal with the round-trip loss of the ring, the critical-coupling condition was met, while the electrical power applied on the arm of MZI was 40 mW; the highest ER (about 13.84 dB) was obtained. An FSR of ~63.89 pm is shown in Figure 5a. Figure 5b shows the normalized transmission of the resonator peak in a critical-coupling condition. The measured data shown by the blue hollow circles were fitted using the theoretical Lorentzian transmission in Origin (see solid red curve). The FWHM of the resonance peak 1533.16 nm for the present resonator was about Δλ = 0.343 pm, which indicated that a loaded ultrahigh-Q factor Qload of 4.47 × 106 was obtained. Since the device operated under a critical-coupling condition, we considered Qload to be half of intrinsic Q factor Qint [5]. Therefore, propagation loss of 0.11 dB/cm of the silica-based waveguide was obtained by using equation Q int 2 π n g / λ α [5], where α is the propagation loss, and the group index is ~1.4615. A deviation of the core geometry affected the effective refractive index of the waveguide. The introduced phase caused the resonance peak shift. The propagation loss of the waveguide was also 0.01 dB/cm larger than that of the simulation. The main reason may have been the loss caused by the MZI. The continued increasing power forced the ring to work in an undercoupling condition. A small resonant wavelength shift was generated during the coupling-condition tuning process because of the additional phase shift of the MZI-based coupler to the ring resonator. When the ring resonator was used as a filter, the small resonant wavelength shift was compensated with the microheater on the ring waveguide. Figure 6 shows the wavelength shift caused by coupling-condition tuning with 3.956 pm/mW.
The resonant wavelength could be tuned by applying electric power to the heater on the ring waveguide. As shown in Figure 7a, owing to the positive thermo-optic coefficient of SiO2 [28], a red shift could be observed. The blue circles mark the resonance peak under the same order. The relationship between applied power and resonant wavelength shift is shown in Figure 7b with a tuning efficiency of ~4.136 pm/mW.

4. Discussion

Table 1 shows a comparison of the microring resonators reported in recent years based on different platforms. The fabrication process and structure were optimized to improve performance of MRRs. InP-based PLC offers a hybrid integration platform with active and passive devices. Through applying tunable structure, the Q factor of InP-based PLC was raised up to ~104 [11,12]. To achieve a high-Q-factor InP MRR, a large radius of 13 mm was used in [13]. A 3 inch InP wafer could fabricate four such devices. However, the Q factor was still lower than the MRR proposed in this paper. Limited by the loss of waveguides, the tunable polymer-based MRR [15] obtained a Q factor of 8.2 × 104. Besides the small size of waveguides, the fiber-to-chip coupling efficiency deteriorated to ~15 dB [15]. Benefitting from the high refractive index contrast between silicon core and silica cladding, the SOI MRR could be more compact than ever. In [7], an ultrahigh Q factor of 1.3 × 106 and a large FSR of 900 pm were obtained by a bent directional coupler. However, the device showed a lack of tolerance and low ER. On the other hand, a large radius decreased the loss but also lowered FSR [29], which limits its application. The same situation happened in SiN MRR. To achieve an ultrahigh Q factor, optimized ICP and chemical mechanical polishing (CMP) are utilized to reduce sidewall and surface roughness [9]. Though a 3.7 × 107 Q factor was obtained, the fabrication process is more complex. An ultrahigh Q factor of 4.22 × 108 SiN MRR was demonstrated in [10]. The ultralarge radius of 11.789 mm limits its application. Compared with our previous work [16], both ER and Q factor were improved. The proposed tunable silica-based MRRs were fabricated by the PLC foundry on a 6 inch silica-on-silicon wafer for commercial use. With a tunable structure, the devices overcame the deviation of the fabrication process. A high Q factor of 4.47 × 106 could be obtained while the ER was 13.84 dB, which means that the propagation loss of the waveguide was 0.11 dB/cm. Though the FSR of 64 pm was small, it could be improved by cascading MRRs.

5. Conclusions

A high-Q-factor tunable MRR was well-designed, fabricated, and experimentally demonstrated. The ER of the MRR could be tuned from 1.12 to 13.84 dB. A high Q factor of 4.47 × 106 was obtained while the ER was 13.84 dB, which means that the propagation loss of the waveguide was 0.11 dB/cm. The MRR was fabricated by the silica-based PLC foundry. The MRR was optically and electrically well-packaged. The proposed MRR shows great potential in practical application for optical communications and integrated optics.

Author Contributions

Methodology, Y.-D.W.; software, Y.-X.Y.; validation, Y.L. and X.-R.X.; formal analysis, X.-P.Z. and X.-P.L.; investigation, Y.-X.Y., Y.L. and X.-R.X.; resources, J.-M.A. and Y.-D.W.; data curation, Y.-X.Y., X.-P.Z. and Y.L.; writing—original-draft preparation, Y.-X.Y. and Y.L.; writing—review and editing, D.-M.Z.; project administration, D.-M.Z.; funding acquisition, X.-J.Y. and D.-M.Z.; All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded National Key Research and Development (R&D) Program of China (2019YFB2203004), and the Science and Technology Development Plan of Jilin Province (20190302010GX).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Mori, Y.; Honda, E.; Shiraki, R.; Suzuki, K.; Matsuura, H.; Kawashima, H.; Namiki, S.; Ikeda, K.; Sato, K.-I. Wavelength-division demultiplexing enhanced by silicon-photonic tunable filters in ultra-wideband optical-path networks. J. Lightwave Technol. 2020, 38, 1002–1009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Dai, D. Highly sensitive digital optical sensor based on cascaded high-q ring-resonators. Opt. Express 2009, 17, 23817–23822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Tu, X.; Chen, S.-L.; Song, C.; Huang, T.; Guo, L.J. Ultrahigh q polymer microring resonators for biosensing applications. IEEE Photonics J. 2019, 11, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ye, Z.; Fülöp, A.; Helgason, Ó.B.; Andrekson, P.A.; Torres-Company, V. Low-loss high-q silicon-rich silicon nitride microresonators for kerr nonlinear optics. Opt. Lett. 2019, 44, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Miller, S.A.; Yu, M.; Ji, X.; Griffith, A.G.; Cardenas, J.; Gaeta, A.L.; Lipson, M. Low-loss silicon platform for broadband mid-infrared photonics. Optica 2017, 4, 707–712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Gao, Y.; Lo, J.-C.; Lee, S.; Patel, R.; Zhu, L.; Nee, J.; Tsou, D.; Carney, R.; Sun, J. High-power, narrow-linewidth, miniaturized silicon photonic tunable laser with accurate frequency control. J. Lightwave Technol. 2020, 38, 265–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Zhang, L.; Jie, L.; Zhang, M.; Wang, Y.; Xie, Y.; Shi, Y.; Dai, D. Ultrahigh-q silicon racetrack resonators. Photonics Res. 2020, 8, 684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Spencer, D.T.; Bauters, J.F.; Heck, M.J.R.; Bowers, J.E. Integrated waveguide coupled si3n4 resonators in the ultrahigh-q regime. Optica 2014, 1, 153–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Ji, X.; Barbosa, F.A.S.; Roberts, S.P.; Dutt, A.; Cardenas, J.; Okawachi, Y.; Bryant, A.; Gaeta, A.L.; Lipson, M. Ultra-low-loss on-chip resonators with sub-milliwatt parametric oscillation threshold. Optica 2017, 4, 619–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Puckett, M.W.; Liu, K.; Chauhan, N.; Zhao, Q.; Jin, N.; Cheng, H.; Wu, J.; Behunin, R.O.; Rakich, P.T.; Nelson, K.D.; et al. 422 million intrinsic quality factor planar integrated all-waveguide resonator with sub-mhz linewidth. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Menon, V.M.; Tong, W.; Forrest, S.R. Control of quality factor and critical coupling in microring resonators through integration of a semiconductor optical amplifier. IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 2004, 16, 1343–1345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Green, W.; Lee, R.; Derose, G.; Scherer, A.; Yariv, A. Hybrid ingaasp-inp mach-zehnder racetrack resonator for thermooptic switching and coupling control. Opt. Express 2005, 13, 1651–1659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Ciminelli, C.; Dell’Olio, F.; Armenise, M.N.; Soares, F.M.; Passenberg, W. High performance inp ring resonator for new generation monolithically integrated optical gyroscopes. Opt. Express 2013, 21, 556–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Jin, L.; Wang, J.; Fu, X.; Yang, B.; Shi, Y.; Dai, D. High-q microring resonators with 2×2 angled multimode interference couplers. IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 2013, 25, 612–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Han, X.; Wang, L.; Wang, Y.; Zou, P.; Gu, Y.; Teng, J.; Wang, J.; Jian, X.; Morthier, G.; Zhao, M. Uv-soft imprinted tunable polymer waveguide ring resonator for microwave photonic filtering. J. Lightwave Technol. 2014, 32, 3924–3932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Yin, Y.-X.; Yin, X.-J.; Zhang, X.-P.; Yan, G.-W.; Wang, Y.; Wu, Y.-D.; An, J.-M.; Wang, L.-L.; Zhang, D.-M. High-q-factor silica-based racetrack microring resonators. Photonics 2021, 8, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wang, L.; An, J.; Wu, Y.; Zhang, J.; Wang, Y.; Li, J.; Wang, H.; Zhang, X.; Pan, P.; Zhang, L.; et al. A compact and low-loss 1 × 8 optical power splitter using silica-based plc on quartz substrate. Opt. Commun. 2014, 312, 203–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Li, C.; An, J.; Zhang, J.; Wang, L.; Li, J.; Wang, Y.; Yin, X.; Wang, H.; Wu, Y. 4×20 ghz silica-based awg hybrid integrated receiver optical sub-assemblies. Chin. Opt. Lett. 2018, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Liu, D.; Sun, S.; Yin, X.; Sun, B.; Sun, J.; Liu, Y.; Li, W.; Zhu, N.; Li, M. Large-capacity and low-loss integrated optical buffer. Opt. Express. 2019, 27, 11585–11593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lee, H.; Chen, T.; Li, J.; Yang, K.Y.; Jeon, S.; Painter, O.; Vahala, K.J. Chemically etched ultrahigh-q wedge-resonator on a silicon chip. Nat. Photonics 2012, 6, 369–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Wu, L.; Wang, H.; Yang, Q.; Ji, Q.X.; Shen, B.; Bao, C.; Gao, M.; Vahala, K. Greater than one billion q factor for on-chip microresonators. Opt. Lett. 2020, 45, 5129–5131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Yi, X.; Yang, Q.-F.; Yang, K.Y.; Suh, M.-G.; Vahala, K. Soliton frequency comb at microwave rates in a high-q silica microresonator. Optica 2015, 2, 1078–1085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Yuan, Z.; Wang, H.; Wu, L.; Gao, M.; Vahala, K. Linewidth enhancement factor in a microcavity brillouin laser. Optica 2020, 7, 1150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Perentos, A.; Cuesta-Soto, F.; Rodrigo, M.; Canciamilla, A.; Vidal, B.; Pierno, L.; Griol, A.; Losilla, N.S.; Bellieres, L.; Lopez-Royo, F.; et al. Variable carrier reduction in radio-over-fiber systems for increased modulation efficiency using a si3n4 tunable extinction ratio ring resonator. Opt. Express 2012, 20, 25478–25488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Huang, M.; Li, S.; Xue, M.; Zhao, L.; Pan, S. Flat-top optical resonance in a single-ring resonator based on manipulation of fast- and slow-light effects. Opt. Express 2018, 26, 23215–23220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ma, C.-S.; Xu, Y.-Z.; Yan, X.; Qin, Z.-K.; Wang, X.-Y. Optimization and analysis of series-coupled microring resonator arrays. Opt. Commun. 2006, 262, 41–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Rabus, D.G. Integrated Ring Resonators; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  28. Ren, M.-Z.; Zhang, J.-S.; An, J.-M.; Wang, Y.; Wang, L.-L.; Li, J.-G.; Wu, Y.-D.; Yin, X.; Hu, X.-W. Low power consumption 4-channel variable optical attenuator array based on planar lightwave circuit technique. Chin. Phys. B 2017, 26, 74221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zhang, B.; Al Qubaisi, K.; Cherchi, M.; Harjanne, M.; Ehrlichman, Y.; Khilo, A.N.; Popovic, M.A. Compact multi-million q resonators and 100 mhz passband filter bank in a thick-soi photonics platform. Opt. Lett. 2020, 45, 3005–3008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Structure of tunable microring resonator.
Figure 1. Structure of tunable microring resonator.
Photonics 08 00256 g001
Figure 2. (a) Calculated normalized transmission with coupling-condition tuning of tunable MRR; (b) calculated deepest resonant peak with Lorentzian fitting.
Figure 2. (a) Calculated normalized transmission with coupling-condition tuning of tunable MRR; (b) calculated deepest resonant peak with Lorentzian fitting.
Photonics 08 00256 g002
Figure 3. Calculated normalized transmission with resonant wavelength tuning of tunable MRR.
Figure 3. Calculated normalized transmission with resonant wavelength tuning of tunable MRR.
Photonics 08 00256 g003
Figure 4. (a) Photograph of silica-based tunable MRR; (b) scanning electron microscope (SEM) image of core waveguide cross-section.
Figure 4. (a) Photograph of silica-based tunable MRR; (b) scanning electron microscope (SEM) image of core waveguide cross-section.
Photonics 08 00256 g004
Figure 5. (a) Coupling-condition tuning of tunable MRR; (b) deepest resonant peak with Lorentzian fitting.
Figure 5. (a) Coupling-condition tuning of tunable MRR; (b) deepest resonant peak with Lorentzian fitting.
Photonics 08 00256 g005
Figure 6. Resonant wavelength shift caused by coupling-condition tuning.
Figure 6. Resonant wavelength shift caused by coupling-condition tuning.
Photonics 08 00256 g006
Figure 7. (a) Resonant-wavelength tuning of tunable MRR; (b) relationship between resonant-wavelength shift and electronic power.
Figure 7. (a) Resonant-wavelength tuning of tunable MRR; (b) relationship between resonant-wavelength shift and electronic power.
Photonics 08 00256 g007
Table 1. Comparison of high-Q MRRs.
Table 1. Comparison of high-Q MRRs.
Ref.PlatformR (μm)FSR (pm)ER (dB)Q Factor
[11]InP-based PLC200250102.2 × 104
[12]InP-based PLC50N.A.18.5N.A.
[13]InP-based PLC130017.87.00.97 × 106
[15]Polymer-based PLC500130188.2 × 104
[7]SOI2990041.3 × 106
[29]SOI26005.1 GHz87.5 × 107
[9]SiN115N.A.N.A.3.7 × 107
[10]SiN11,7872.713 GHzN.A.4.22 × 108
[16]Silica-based PLC160013731.83 × 106
This WorkSilica-based PLC16006413.844.47 × 106
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yin, Y.-X.; Zhang, X.-P.; Yin, X.-J.; Li, Y.; Xu, X.-R.; An, J.-M.; Wu, Y.-D.; Liu, X.-P.; Zhang, D.-M. High-Q-Factor Tunable Silica-Based Microring Resonators. Photonics 2021, 8, 256. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics8070256

AMA Style

Yin Y-X, Zhang X-P, Yin X-J, Li Y, Xu X-R, An J-M, Wu Y-D, Liu X-P, Zhang D-M. High-Q-Factor Tunable Silica-Based Microring Resonators. Photonics. 2021; 8(7):256. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics8070256

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yin, Yue-Xin, Xiao-Pei Zhang, Xiao-Jie Yin, Yue Li, Xin-Ru Xu, Jun-Ming An, Yuan-Da Wu, Xiao-Ping Liu, and Da-Ming Zhang. 2021. "High-Q-Factor Tunable Silica-Based Microring Resonators" Photonics 8, no. 7: 256. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics8070256

APA Style

Yin, Y. -X., Zhang, X. -P., Yin, X. -J., Li, Y., Xu, X. -R., An, J. -M., Wu, Y. -D., Liu, X. -P., & Zhang, D. -M. (2021). High-Q-Factor Tunable Silica-Based Microring Resonators. Photonics, 8(7), 256. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics8070256

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop