Comparison of Regularization Methods in Fluorescence Molecular Tomography
AbstractIn vivo fluorescence molecular tomography (FMT) has been a popular functional imaging modality in research labs in the past two decades. One of the major difficulties of FMT lies in the ill-posed and ill-conditioned nature of the inverse problem in reconstructing the distribution of fluorophores inside objects. The popular regularization methods based on L2, L1 and total variation (TV ) norms have been applied in FMT reconstructions. The non-convex Lq(0 < q < 1) semi-norm and Log function have also been studied recently. In this paper, we adopt a uniform optimization transfer framework for these regularization methods in FMT and compare their individual, as well as the combined effects on both small, localized targets, such as tumors in the early stage, and large targets, such as liver. Numerical simulation studies and phantom experiments have been carried out, and we found that Lq with q near 1/2 performs the best in reconstructing small targets, while joint L2 and Log performs the best for large targets. View Full-Text
Share & Cite This Article
Zhu, D.; Zhao, Y.; Baikejiang, R.; Yuan, Z.; Li, C. Comparison of Regularization Methods in Fluorescence Molecular Tomography. Photonics 2014, 1, 95-109.
Zhu D, Zhao Y, Baikejiang R, Yuan Z, Li C. Comparison of Regularization Methods in Fluorescence Molecular Tomography. Photonics. 2014; 1(2):95-109.Chicago/Turabian Style
Zhu, Dianwen; Zhao, Yue; Baikejiang, Reheman; Yuan, Zhen; Li, Changqing. 2014. "Comparison of Regularization Methods in Fluorescence Molecular Tomography." Photonics 1, no. 2: 95-109.