Next Article in Journal
Effects of Transition from Remote to In-Person Learning in University Students: A Longitudinal Study
Previous Article in Journal
Emotional Intelligence and Personality Traits of University Students in Dentistry, Medicine and Pharmacy Degrees
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Facilitators and Barriers Perceived by German Teachers Considering Basic Life Support Education in School—A Qualitative Study

1
Faculty of Biology/Biology Didcactics (OZHB), Bielefeld University, 33615 Bielefeld, Germany
2
Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany
3
German Resuscitation Council, 89070 Ulm, Germany
4
FOM University of Applied Sciences, 50678 Cologne, Germany
5
Clinic for Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Franziskus Hospital Bielefeld, 33615 Bielefeld, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Eur. J. Investig. Health Psychol. Educ. 2024, 14(6), 1769-1785; https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe14060117
Submission received: 29 February 2024 / Revised: 10 April 2024 / Accepted: 12 June 2024 / Published: 18 June 2024
(This article belongs to the Topic Health Questionaries)

Abstract

This qualitative study aims to analyse the personal qualification, attitudes and the pedagogical concepts of German teachers as experts in their profession regarding basic life support (BLS) education in secondary schools. Thirteen (n = 13) secondary school teachers participated in semi-structured expert interviews and were interviewed for at least 20 to 60 min regarding BLS student education. Interviews were semi-structured with guiding questions addressing (1) personal experience, (2) teacher qualification for BLS and (3) implementation factors (e.g., personal, material and organisational). Audio-recorded interviews were analysed by content analysis, generating a coding system. School teachers provided a heterogeneous view on implementation-related processes in BLS education. Many teachers were educated in first aid, acknowledge its importance, but had no experience in teaching BLS. They want to assure being competent for teaching BLS and need tailored trainings, materials, pedagogical information and the incorporation into the curriculum. Also, the management of time constraints, unwilling colleagues, or young students being overwhelmed were commonly mentioned considerations. Concluding, teachers reported to be willing to teach BLS but a stepwise implementation framework incorporating practice-oriented qualification and educational goals is missing.
Keywords: implementation; school development; BLS; first aid; barriers implementation; school development; BLS; first aid; barriers

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Dumcke, R.; Wegner, C.; Wingen, S.; Rahe-Meyer, N. Facilitators and Barriers Perceived by German Teachers Considering Basic Life Support Education in School—A Qualitative Study. Eur. J. Investig. Health Psychol. Educ. 2024, 14, 1769-1785. https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe14060117

AMA Style

Dumcke R, Wegner C, Wingen S, Rahe-Meyer N. Facilitators and Barriers Perceived by German Teachers Considering Basic Life Support Education in School—A Qualitative Study. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education. 2024; 14(6):1769-1785. https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe14060117

Chicago/Turabian Style

Dumcke, Rico, Claas Wegner, Sabine Wingen, and Niels Rahe-Meyer. 2024. "Facilitators and Barriers Perceived by German Teachers Considering Basic Life Support Education in School—A Qualitative Study" European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education 14, no. 6: 1769-1785. https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe14060117

APA Style

Dumcke, R., Wegner, C., Wingen, S., & Rahe-Meyer, N. (2024). Facilitators and Barriers Perceived by German Teachers Considering Basic Life Support Education in School—A Qualitative Study. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education, 14(6), 1769-1785. https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe14060117

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop