Next Article in Journal
Optimization of a Fuzzy Automatic Voltage Controller Using Real-Time Recurrent Learning
Next Article in Special Issue
To Advance Industrial Green Technology via Environmental Governance—Evidence from China’s Industrial Sector
Previous Article in Journal
Modeling of Technological Processes for a Rectification Plant in Second-Generation Bioethanol Production
Previous Article in Special Issue
Removal of Phenol from Aqueous Solution Using Internal Microelectrolysis with Fe-Cu: Optimization and Application on Real Coking Wastewater
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Processes
Volume 9
Issue 6
10.3390/pr9060946
processes-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Degradation of Landfill Leachate Using UV-TiO2 Photocatalysis Combination with Aged Waste Reactors

by
Chunlian Wang
1,2,
Xiaojie Sun
1,2,*,
Huijun Shan
1,2,
Hongxia Zhang
1,2 and
Beidou Xi
1,3,4
1
Guangxi Key Laboratory of Environmental Pollution Control Theory and Technology, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin 541004, China
2
Guangxi Collaborative Innovation Center for Water Pollution Control and Water Safety in Karst Area, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin 541004, China
3
State Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China
4
State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Simulation and Control of Groundwater Pollution, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Processes 2021, 9(6), 946; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9060946
Submission received: 18 April 2021 / Revised: 23 May 2021 / Accepted: 24 May 2021 / Published: 27 May 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Innovative Materials and Processes for Removal of Biopersistent Pollutants)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
This study explored the performance of TiO2 nanoparticles in combination with aged waste reactors to treat landfill leachate. The optimum conditions for synthesis of TiO2 were determined by a series of characterizations and removal rates of methyl orange. The effect of the ultraviolet irradiation time, amount of the catalyst, and pH on the removal efficiency for the chemical oxygen demand (COD) and color in the leachate was explored to determine the optimal process conditions, which were 500 min, 4 g/L and 8.88, respectively. The removal rates for COD and chroma under three optimal conditions were obtained by the single factor control method: 89% and 70%; 95.56% and 70%; and 85% and 87.5%, respectively. Under optimal process conditions, the overall average removal rates for ammonium nitrogen (NH4+–N) and COD in the leachate for the combination of TiO2 nanoparticles and an aged waste reactor were 98.8% and 32.5%, respectively, and the nitrate (NO3−–N) and nitrite nitrogen (NO2–N) concentrations were maintained at 7–9 and 0.01–0.017 mg/L, respectively. TiO2 nanoparticles before and after the photocatalytic reaction were characterized by emission scanning electron microscopy, energy dispersive spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction, and Fourier transform infrared spectrometry. In addition, TiO2 nanoparticles have excellent recyclability, showing the potential of the photocatalytic/biological combined treatment of landfill leachate. This simulation of photocatalysis-landfilling could be a baseline study for the implementation of technology at the pilot scale.

1. Introduction

Leachates produced in landfills contain various organic and inorganic compounds, such as refractory organic material, dissolved solid particles, ammonia nitrogen (NH3–N), and heavy metals, which seriously threaten the environment and local ecosystems [1,2,3]. Often, combined anaerobic–aerobic biological processes can be utilized to degrade the biodegradable organic pollutants of leachates [4,5,6]. However, over time, the reduction of the biological oxygen demand/chemical oxygen demand (BOD5/COD) ratio < 0.3 and microorganisms involved in nitrification–denitrification processes are readily hampered by high concentrations of ammonium nitrogen, making it difficult to be treated by the conventional biological and physicochemical processes [7,8,9,10]. Moreover, additional carbon sources are needed to aid the nitrification–denitrification process [11]. Hence, a novel method has been presented to transform landfills into bioreactors via leachate recirculation, which is expected to accelerate the stabilization of landfills and reduce the organic strength of leachates [12]. However, recirculated leachates also lead to the accumulation of higher levels of NH4+–N and refractory organics compared with traditional landfills because of the increasing ammonification rate and the lack of carbon sources [13].
Recently, the application of semiconductor-based photocatalysis in the treatment of landfill leachates has attracted attention [14,15,16]. The technology could effectively mineralize a wide range of organic pollutants into low-toxicity organic small molecules, CO2, and H2O without the use of expensive oxidant [17]. Among photocatalysis, TiO2 has been extensively studied due to its super strong photo-oxidizing ability, easy accessibility and environmental friendliness, and it has been considered to be a green catalyst material with broad development prospects in the field of water treatment [18,19]. TiO2 absorbs UV light (<380 nm), and electrons are promoted from the valence band (VB) to the conduction band (CB) to generate electron–hole pairs (e−/h+). Positive holes typically oxidize organic compounds, inducing their oxidative degradation. In addition, electrons mainly reduce molecular oxygen to superoxide radical anions, thereby leading to a number of reactive oxygen species (OH•, O2−•, and HO2•). Some titanium dioxide-based materials are used to treat refractory pollutants, such as prepared B–TiO2-graphene oxide ternary nanocomposite in the degradation of bisphenol A with a mineralization rate of 47.66% [20], iron-doped TiO2 photodegradation for rhodamine B at about 90% [21], and TiO2-based catalysts obtained by different preparation methods; the simultaneous oxidation of organic matter and the reduction in ammonia were observed during the solar photocatalytic treatment of greywater [22].
Within this context, aiming to increase the effectiveness of the treatment of landfills, researchers have investigated the application of combination techniques, integrating biological processes with advanced oxidation processes [23]. Cai et al. [24] applied cetyltrimethylammonium bromide bentonite–titanium dioxide photocatalytic technology to the pretreatment of aging leachate, which maintained the removal of COD and NH3–N at 82% and 37% in 60.02 min, respectively. Pellenz et al. [25] used a boron-doped diamond-based photo-electro-Fenton system integrated with biological oxidation to treat landfill leachate, which reduced its toxic potential. Researchers have attempted to implement anaerobic bioreactor technology for effective MSW treatment through leachate decontamination [26]. Simulations of landfilling in anaerobic bioreactors function as anaerobic sludge digesters and facilitate accelerated and economic waste stabilization [27]. The study of integrating biological processes with advanced oxidation processes in simple lab scale reactors is an important stage to enable real-scale integrated applications in the treatment of landfill leachate, which could solve the bottleneck caused by the high toxicity and insufficient carbon source of landfill leachate treatments. Thus, the main objectives of this study were two-fold. First, we intended to explore the best conditions for the synthesis of TiO2 at different hydrothermal temperatures and the different ratio of titanium to urea based on the efficiency of methyl orange and learn about optimal reaction conditions under different irradiation times, amounts of TiO2, and initial pH regarding COD and color treatment efficiency in diluted leachate. At this stage, the TiO2 particles were characterized by energy dispersive spectrum (EDS), X-ray diffraction (XRD), and Fourier transform infrared (FTIR). The second goal was to investigate the possibility of using synthetic TiO2-guided photocatalysis in combination with an aged waste reactor to treat landfill leachates under the best process conditions by examining the removal rates or concentration of NH4+–N, nitrate (NO3−–N), nitrite nitrogen (NO2−–N), and COD. Currently, there is relatively little published information on dealing with aging leachates by aged waste reactors combined with photocatalytic technology. This study expects to provide some suggestions for accelerating the process of waste stabilization.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sampling

Landfill leachate was obtained from the Chongkou landfill in Guangxi, China. The general characteristics of the raw leachate studied were as follows: COD, 7647 mg/L; pH, 8.88; NH4+–N, 26.73 mg/L. The original water was diluted 30 times prior to treatment given the high contaminant load in the original landfill leachate.
Leachate samples were analyzed by the standard for pollution control on the landfill site of the MSW [28]. COD was determined in accordance with the dichromate titration method. NH4+–N, NO3−–N, NO2−–N, and chromaticity were measured with an ultraviolet-visible spectrophotometer (UV-6100A, Yuanxi Instrument Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China). The pH was measured using the glass electrode method (Yidian Scientific Instrument Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) and adjusted by adding HCl or NaOH.

2.2. TiO2 Nanoparticle Synthesis

The TiO2 nanoparticles were prepared by the green and mild solvothermal method [17,29]. First, 12.6 g of Ti(SO4)2 and 3.15, 6.3 and 12.6 g of urea were dissolved in 40 mL of ultrapure water, the solution was stirred at room temperature for 20 min, and the mixture was transferred into a Teflon-lined stainless autoclave of 100 mL capacity, sealed, and heated at different temperatures (100 °C, 120 °C, 150 °C and 180 °C) for 12 h. After the system cooled down to room temperature, the products were washed with deionized water three times and separated by centrifugation until the system was neutral. Finally, the products were dried in air at 80 °C for 12 h. Among them, the weight ratio of Ti(SO4)2 and urea was controlled at about 1:1,1:2 and 1:4.

2.3. Characterization of TiO2 Nanoparticles

Four methods of characterization were used to describe the characteristics of the synthesized TiO2 nanoparticles. To determine the structural characteristics and crystalline phases of the nanoparticles, the X-ray diffraction (XRD) method was used. The diffraction angle range of 2θ = 10°–80° was measured by a PANalytical X’Pert3 Powder X-ray diffractometer (the Netherlands). Field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM) analysis was used to visualize the morphology of the nanoparticles. This analysis was accomplished with the Electron JSM-7900F FESEM in Japan. Qualitative and quantitative analyses of the sample elements were conducted by energy dispersive spectrum (EDS) analysis and by using the electron JSM-7900F FESEM in Japan at an accelerating voltage of 15 kV. The molecular structure changes of different samples were analyzed by Fourier transform infrared spectrometry (FTIR), using a device produced in the U.S.A. by PerkinElmer, at a scan range of 4000–400 cm−1.

2.4. Photocatalytic Experiments

The visible photocatalytic activities of the obtained samples were investigated by the photodegradation of methyl orange in an aqueous solution. An amount of 20 mg of the sample was dispersed into 50 mL of the methyl orange solution (10 mg/L)/diluted leachate in a Pyrex glass reactor. A 300 W xenon lamp (Naai Precision Instrument Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) with a UV light source (Figure 1) was used. The solution was allowed to reach an adsorption–desorption equilibrium among the photocatalyst and methyl orange by magnetic stirring in the dark for 30 min before irradiation with UV light. At certain time intervals, the 2 mL suspension was sampled and filtered through the 0.45 m filter membrane to remove the particles. The concentration of methyl orange was determined by a UV-visible spectrophotometer (UV-6100A, Yuanxi, Shanghai, China) according to its absorbance wavelength at 464 nm.

2.5. Cooperative Degradation Experiments

This study was conducted as a follow-up to a previous study, and the same materials were used, including anaerobic reactors formed by domestic waste (numbered C and E) and aged waste reactors (numbered D and F) (Figure 2) [13,30]. These materials were suitable for the microbial domestication of the test stage. The leachate produced by C and E was treated with D and F to form a recharge solution, which circulated back to the corresponding anaerobic landfill device. Groups CD (Figure 2a) and EF (Figure 2b) microbially acclimatized for 14 days. The frequency obtained was 1 time/d when the leachate diluted 30 times was used as the inlet water. From day 15 to day 33, the operation mode of the CD group remained unchanged. However, in groups E and F, the effluent of reactor F was treated by the photocatalytic reactor and then recharged to reactor E. In this study, only the changes in the D and F effluent indexes were investigated.
The photocatalytic reaction phase is as follows: 2 g of the TiO2 was dispersed into 500 mL (25 °C) of the effluent of reactor F with photocatalytic treatment for 8 h under simulated sunlight (500 W).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Characterization of Photocatalysts

With methyl orange as the target pollutant, the best preparation conditions for TiO2 were obtained by evaluating its degradation efficiency (Figure 3). The removal ratio is calculated by the following equations [31]:
removal ratio = (C0 − C)/C0 × 100%
where C and C0 correspond to residual concentrations and initial concentrations of methyl orange. During the dark reaction carried out for 30 min, the maximum adsorption removal rates of methyl orange under the two conditions reached 9.87% and 4%, respectively. The best preparation condition of TiO2 appeared when the hydrothermal reaction temperature was 150 °C and the ratio of titanium sulfate to urea was 1:1 with 95.97% removal efficiency of methyl orange under UV light.
The surface morphology and surface area were very effective parameters in the photocatalytic activity of TiO2 [32]. The SEM images revealed that nano-TiO2 had a smooth surface, and EDS analysis illustrated the content of Ti and O elements, showing that the prepared sample had high purity (Figure 4a,b). The XRD spectrum was used to analyze the crystal structure, as shown in Figure 4c,d. From data analysis, the body-centered tetragonal crystal structure of anatase was identified based on significant diffraction peaks: 20.2°, 37.8°, 47.9°, 53.9°, 55°, and 62.6° corresponding to (101), (004), (200), (105), (211), and (204) planes, respectively (JCPDS 86–1157). As previously reported in the literature, the diffraction peak of the anatase crystal form became stronger as the half-peak width narrowed, and the sample showed a good crystal form at 150 °C. The result of the XRD patterns of products with different ratios of titanium sulfate to urea show that all the samples exhibit high crystallinity, especially when the ratio is 1:2 (Figure 4d). Meanwhile, the particle size of sample was calculated by the Scherrer formula [33]:
  D = ( K λ ⁄ B cos θ )    
where D is the average crystal size of the sample, λ is the X-ray wavelength (1.54056 Å), B is the full width at half maximum of the diffraction peak (radian), K is a coefficient (0.89), and θ is the diffraction angle at the peak maximum. The particle size of TiO2 at 100 °C, 120 °C, 150 °C, and 180 °C was 5.3, 9.7, 11.8, and 16.4 nm, respectively, and the particle size of TiO2 at titanium sulfate–urea ratios of 1:1, 1:2, and 1:4 was 11.8, 13.1, and 9.5 nm, respectively. Considering the crystallinity of the synthesized sample and degradation rate for methyl orange, the optimal particle size of titanium dioxide was 11.8 nm in this experiment.
The FTIR spectrum analysis chart of TiO2 prepared under controlled conditions is shown in Figure 4e,f. The characteristic peak at 150 °C was the strongest, and the crystal structure was the most complete, which was consistent with the XRD analysis. The peak at 460 cm−1 of TiO2 was assigned as the Ti–O stretching vibration and Ti–O–Ti bridging stretching vibration [34]. The two signals at 1640 cm−1 and 3420 cm−1 can be ascribed to the −OH bending vibration of the water on the surface of TiO2 (Figure 4e) [35]. The adsorbed water and hydroxyl groups on the surface of the catalyst would interact with the electron-holes generated by the excitation to produce hydroxyl radicals with strong oxidizability (Figure 4e) [36]. Therefore, the best synthesis conditions are a temperature of 150 °C and a titanium sulfate–urea ratio of 1:1.

3.2. Optimization of Photocatalytic Processes

The results of photocatalytic degradation of the landfill leachate by adjusting the irradiation time are shown in Figure 5a. During the dark reaction carried out for 30 min, the removal rates by TiO2 adsorption of COD and color was 93.94% and 60%, respectively. The maximum COD and color removal rates were 89% and 70% under UV light, respectively. The reason for the increased COD value may be that the photocatalytic reaction oxidizes the complex macromolecular organics into small molecular organics after the light is turned on. Hassan et al. [37] pointed out that an increase in COD concentration at the end of photocatalysis is due to a decrease in catalytic efficiency caused by the deposition of pollutants on the catalyst with time. Sama Azadi et al. [38] also confirmed this conclusion. It is speculated that the reason for a COD removal rate that is higher than the chromaticity removal rate is due to low phenolic substances in the reaction process, as color reduction simply reflects the oxidative opening benzene ring in the phenolic substances to other straight chain compounds [39]. The result is consistent with the removal rate of COD and color treated by AC/TiO2 for the last 30 min [40]. The reason why the COD decrease was faster than the color removal needs more research. For this batch of the experiment, equal amounts of 200 mg TiO2 were added into a series of test beakers containing 50 mL of the landfill leachate.
As shown in Figure 5b,c, when the dosage of TiO2 was 200 mg (4 g/L), the COD and decolorization removal rate were 94.28% and 70.00%, respectively. The highest photocatalytic efficiency did not appear at the dosage of 400 mg (8 g/L). The study confirmed that with the increase in the amount of TiO2, the irradiated area and the photocatalytic rate increased [41]. At a TiO2 dosage of 4 g/L, Jia [42] removed 37.4% COD and 55.5% color, but the degradation ratio decreased, except COD, when the dosage was increased to 16 g/L. Miao et al. [43] noted that when the catalyst dosage reached the saturation level, the light absorption coefficient decreased. Therefore, the optimal dosage TiO2 was 200 mg (4 g/L) in this study. For this batch of experiment, the duration of experiments performed was 750 min.
The results of photocatalytic degradation of the leachate at different initial pH values (2, 5, 7, 9, and 11) are shown in Figure 5d,e. During the reaction process, different pH values slightly affected the COD removal rate of approximately 85%. The color removal rate was evident under acidic conditions. When the pH value was 2, the color removal increased up to 87.5%. Jia et al. [44] studied the degradation of the landfill leachate by the photocatalytic treatment process and proposed that the optimal pH value was 4. Some researchers suggested that HCO3−/CO32− anions brought about significant inhibitory effect on photocatalytic oxidation of refractory organics present in the leachate [45]. However, Xu et al. [46] noted that upon decreasing the leachate pH from 5.4 to 3.9, the amount and size of aggregated TiO2 particles increased. Anpo and Kamat suggested that the highest pollutant adsorption and maximum photocatalytic removal efficiency were observed at a pH close to pHzpc [47]. Azadi et al. [38] indicated that the pHzpc values of C and C–W co-doped TiO2 C-doped nanoparticles were 6.27 and 6.7, respectively, and the highest COD removal rate was in the range of pH value 6–7. The COD removal efficiency increased with leachate pH as reported in the literature [8]. Therefore, the pH value near pHzpc had the best photocatalytic efficiency. In addition, the reason for the highest color removal rate at pH = 2 may be the conversion of colored substances to colorless substances during the photocatalytic reaction under strong acidity [48]. The original pH of the leachate in this test was alkaline (8.88), and the pH of the leachate was unadjusted from the engineering point of view. For this batch of the experiment, equal amounts of 200 mg TiO2 were added into a series of test beakers containing 50 mL of the landfill leachate, and the duration of the experiments performed was 750 min.
In addition, combined with the maximum removal rates of COD and color under the three conditions, the optimal reaction time in this study was 500 min.

3.3. Treatment of Leachate by Aging Reactor Combined with Photocatalysis

The indicators of each reactor after acclimation are shown in Table 1.
As shown in Figure 6a, from day 15 to 33, the concentrations of NH4+–N in reactors D and F were 0.083–2.523 and 0.083–1.17 mg/L, respectively. The average removal rate was 80.3% for reactor D and 98.8% of reactor F. The NH4+–N concentration in the effluent of the photocatalytic reaction was high, which was probably due to the photocatalytic reaction converting the nitrogen-containing organic matter into nitrogen-containing inorganic matter in the leachate. This finding shows that the leachate contains a large amount of heterocyclic nitrogen and amino compounds that readily hampered the nitrification–denitrification processes [9,49].
Figure 6b illustrates that the concentration of NO3-N in the effluent of reactor D and the NO3–N concentration of the effluents of reactor F was 7–9 mg/L. Boonnorat et al. found that the leachate produced by a landfill for a long time contained low carbon/nitrogen (C/N) ratios [50]. The photocatalytic reaction of TiO2 with a circulating leachate transformed the refractory organic matter into biodegradable organic matter, which was looped through the anaerobic landfill reactor E to accelerate the degradation of domestic waste and then recycled at the reactor F to provide a carbon source for denitrifying bacteria. Therefore, the concentration of NO3−–N in reactor F was lower than that in reactor D [51,52]. Figure 6c shows that NO2−–N concentrations of reactors D and F were 0.01–0.032 and 0.01–0.017 mg/L, respectively. However, the NO2−–N concentration of the photocatalytic effluent F’ increased, which confirms the conclusion that the nitrogen-containing organic matter shown in Figure 6a was degraded into NH4+–N [53] The N-compound conversion equation is as follows:
TiO2 + hv → e− + h+
h+ + H2O → OH• + H+
e−+ O2 → O2−•
O2−• + e−+ 2H+ → H2O2
H2O2 + e− → OH• + OH−
DON + OH•+ O2−• + H2O → NH4+ + OH−
NH4+ + 2 O2−• + 2H2O → NO2− +2·HO2 + 3H2
2NO2− + 2O2 → 2 NO3−
2NO2− + 2 OH• → NO3− + H2O
where OH• and O2−• are active species produced in the photocatalytic process.
As shown in Figure 6d, at days 15 to 20, the COD concentration difference between the effluent of aged waste reactors D and F was not evident, and the microorganisms were still in a certain adaptation stage. From day 21 to the end of the process, the average COD removal rate (32.5%) of reactor F was also higher than that of reactor D (21.20%). At the end of the research, the COD concentrations of the effluent from reactor D and F were 125.49 and 83.14 mg/L, respectively; thus, reactor D satisfied the standard for pollution control on the landfill site of the MSW [28]. A possible explanation is that in the presence of organic compounds, the generated hydroxyl radicals interact with the aromatic and heterocyclic compounds present in the leachate, which favor the formation of small aliphatic chains of carboxylic acids resulting in compounds that are easily assimilated by microorganisms [54]. This result indicates that the photocatalytic reaction degrades the refractory organics into biodegradable organic matter, which can be degraded by the microorganisms in an aged waste reactor [55,56]. Accordingly, the photocatalytic reaction increases the biodegradable organic matter in the circulating leachate, which is more easily degraded by microorganisms in reactor F. With the combined process, it was possible to treat an effluent with a high organic load, meeting the restrictive standards of release in the recipient water bodies [57].

3.4. Photocatalyst Stability

The experiment of removing COD and color was repeated three times to evaluate the recycling and stability of the nanophotocatalyst. After each cycle, the catalyst was collected and washed by simple centrifugation, washed with deionized water, and dried at 120 °C. As shown in Figure 7, after three cycles, the COD removal rate was 90.00% and the color change rate was 63.33%. These findings indicate that after recovery, the nanophotocatalyst can maintain activity and continue to provide electrons during the photocatalytic reaction to promote substrate degradation. Therefore, it had good industrial application prospects.
XRD characterization, FTIR spectroscopy, SEM observation, and EDS analysis were carried out to study the structure, morphology, and chemical composition of the recovered TiO2 nanoparticles. As shown in Figure 8a, after the reaction, the TiO2 crystal form, crystal plane, and diffraction peak intensity did not significantly change. According to Scherrer’s formula, the grain diameter after the reaction increased to 14.1 nm, but as the grain size increased, the specific surface area and the photocatalytic activity gradually decreased, consistent with the photocatalyst stability test results (Figure 8b). The FTIR diagram shows that, after the photocatalytic reaction, the characteristic peaks at 3420, 1640, 1400, and 1060 cm−1 increased. This finding indicates that the surface of TiO2 adsorbed organic matter containing hydroxyl groups and SO42−. In addition, the absorption peaks of CH and CO appeared at 2974 cm−1and 2900 cm−1, respectively, which was caused by the organic matter in the leachate that adsorbed on the surface of the TiO2 particles. However, the characteristic peak intensity of crystalline TiO2 molecules with a wavelength of 460 cm−1 decreased. The reason may be that organic matter occupied the active site of TiO2, thereby weakening the stretching of Ti–O and Ti–O–Ti vibration (Figure 8c). Accordingly, TiO2 nanoparticles have the potential to maintain high photocatalytic efficiency during stability tests.

4. Conclusions

The effects of TiO2 nanoparticles and aged waste reactor combined treatment of NH4+–N, NO3−–N, NO2−–N, and COD in landfill leachate were discussed. SEM, FTIR, and XRD were used to determine the optimal hydrothermal reaction temperature of the synthesized nanoparticles at 150 °C, and the ratio of titanium to urea was 1:1. Then, considering the removal rate for COD and chromaticity as the index, the optimal photocatalytic reaction time was 500 min, the best dosage of TiO2 nanoparticles was 4 g/L, and the original leachate had pH = 8.88. The removal rates of COD and chroma under three conditions were obtained by the single-factor control method: 89% and 70%; 95.56% and 70%; and 85% and 87.5%, respectively. Under the best process conditions, after the combined treatment with TiO2 nanoparticles and an aged waste reactor for landfill leachate, the overall average removal rates of NH4+–N and COD were 98.8% and 32.5%, respectively. The concentration of NO3−–N and NO2−–N were maintained at 7–9 and 0.01–0.017 mg/L, respectively. The combined device degraded the refractory biodegradable organic matter into biodegradable organic matter, and the recharge to the anaerobic bioreactor landfill can continue to accelerate the degradation of domestic garbage. This simulation of photocatalysis-landfilling could be a baseline study for the implementation of technology at the pilot scale to accelerate the process of waste stabilization.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.W.; data curation, C.W. and H.S.; funding acquisition, X.S.; investigation, B.X., H.Z.; methodology, H.S.; project administration, B.X.; software, C.W.; supervision, X.S.; writing—original draft, C.W.; writing—review and editing, X.S. and H.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 52070049); Natural Science Foundation of Guangxi (No. 2018GXNSFGA281001); Science and Technology Major Project of Guangxi (GuikeAA18118013); Innovation Project of Guangxi Graduate Education (No. YCSW2021198).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the authors.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Guo, Y.; Sheehan, J.D.; Chen, Z.; Wang], S. Oxidative degradation of landfill leachate by catalysis of CeMnOx/TiO2 in super-critical water: Mechanism and kinetic study. Chem. Eng. J. 2018, 578–586. [Google Scholar]
  2. Yang, Y.; Liu, Z.; Demeestere, K.; Van Hulle, S. Ozonation in view of micropollutant removal from biologically treated landfill leachate: Removal efficiency, OH exposure, and surrogate-based monitoring. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 410, 128413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Clarke, B.O.; Anumol, T.; Barlaz, M.; Snyder, S.A. Investigating landfill leachate as a source of trace organic pollutants. Chemosphere 2015, 127, 269–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Gao, J.; Oloibiri, V.; Chys, M.; Audenaert, W.T.M.; Decostere, B.; He, Y.; Van Langenhove, H.; Demeestere, K.; Van Hulle, S.W.H. The present status of landfill leachate treatment and its development trend from a technological point of view. Rev. Environ. Sci. Biol. Technol. 2015, 14, 93–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Duyar, A.; Ciftcioglu, V.; Cirik, K.; Civelekoglu, G.; Uruş, S. Treatment of landfill leachate using single-stage anoxic moving bed biofilm reactor and aerobic membrane reactor. Sci. Total. Environ. 2021, 776, 145919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Luo, H.; Zeng, Y.; Cheng, Y.; He, D.; Pan, X. Recent advances in municipal landfill leachate: A review focusing on its characteristics, treatment, and toxicity assessment. Sci. Total. Environ. 2020, 703, 135468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Hassan, M.; Xie, B. Use of aged refuse-based bioreactor/biofilter for landfill leachate treatment. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2014, 98, 6543–6553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Chys, M.; Oloibiri, V.A.; Audenaert, W.T.; Demeestere, K.; Van Hulle, S.W. Ozonation of biologically treated landfill leachate: Efficiency and insights in organic conversions. Chem. Eng. J. 2015, 277, 104–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Oloibiri, V.; Chys, M.; De Wandel, S.; Demeestere, K.; Van Hulle, S.W. Removal of organic matter and ammonium from landfill leachate through different scenarios: Operational cost evaluation in a full-scale case study of a Flemish landfill. J. Environ. Manag. 2017, 203, 774–781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Chen, W.; Gu, Z.; Wen, P.; Li, Q. Degradation of refractory organic contaminants in membrane concentrates from landfill leachate by a combined coagulation-ozonation process. Chemosphere 2019, 217, 411–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Chys, M.; Declerck, W.; Audenaert, W.T.; Van Hulle, S. UV/H2O2, O3 and (photo-) Fenton as treatment prior to granular activated carbon filtration of biologically stabilized landfill leachate. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2014, 90, 525–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Xu, Q.; Tian, Y.; Wang, S.; Ko, J.H. A comparative study of leachate quality and biogas generation in simulated anaerobic and hybrid bioreactors. Waste Manag. 2015, 41, 94–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Li, J.; Wu, B.; Li, Q.; Zou, Y.; Cheng, Z.; Sun, X.; Xi, B. Ex situ simultaneous nitrification-denitrification and in situ denitri-fication process for the treatment of landfill leachates. Waste Manag. 2019, 88, 301–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Xu, Q.; Siracusa, G.; Di Gregorio, S.; Yuan, Q. COD removal from biologically stabilized landfill leachate using Advanced Oxidation Processes (AOPs). Process Saf. Environ. Protect. 2018, 120, 278–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Fresno, F.; Portela, R.; Suárez, S.; Coronado, J.M. Photocatalytic materials: Recent achievements and near future trends. J. Mater. Chem. A 2014, 2, 2863–2884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Yan, M.; Wu, Y.; Liu, X. Photocatalytic nanocomposite membranes for high-efficiency degradation of tetracycline under visible light: An imitated core-shell Au-TiO2-based design. J. Alloys Compd. 2021, 855, 157548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Chen, J.; Xiong, Y.; Duan, M.; Li, X.; Li, J.; Fang, S.W.; Qin, S.; Zhang, R. Insight into the Synergistic Effect of Adsorption-Photocatalysis for the Removal of Organic Dye Pollutants by Cr-Doped ZnO. Langmuir 2020, 36, 520–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Mirzaei, M.; Dabi, B.; Dadvar, M.; Jafarikojour, M. Photocatalysis of Phenol Using a Spinning Disc Photoreactor Immobilized with TiO2 Nanoparticles: Hydrodynamic Modeling and Reactor Optimization. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2017, 56, 1739–1749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Yu, X.; Qiu, H.; Wang, B.; Meng, Q.; Zhao, K. A ternary photocatalyst of all-solid-state Z-scheme TiO2–Au–BiOBr for efficiently degrading various dyes. J. Alloys Compd. 2020, 839, 155597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Altina, I.; Mab, X.; Boffab, V.; Bacaksızc, E.; Magnaccad, G. Hydrothermal preparation of B–TiO2-graphene oxide ternary nanocomposite, characterization and photocatalytic degradation of bisphenol A under simulated solar irradiation. Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 2021, 123, 105591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Shao, S.; Yu, J.; Love, J.B.; Fan, X. An economic approach to produce iron doped TiO2 nanorods from ilmenite for photocatalytic applications. J. Alloys Compd. 2021, 858, 158388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Priyanka, K.; Remya, N.; Behera, M. Comparison of titanium dioxide based catalysts preparation methods in the minerali-zation and nutrients removal from greywater by solar photocatalysis. J. Clean Prod. 2019, 235, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Seibert, D.; Borba, F.H.; Bueno, F.; Inticher, J.J.; Modenes, A.N.; Espinoza-Quinones, F.R.; Bergamasco, R. Two-stage integrated system photo-electro-Fenton and biological oxidation process assessment of sanitary landfill leachate treatment: An intermediate products study. Chem. Eng. J. 2019, 372, 471–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Cai, F.F.; Yang, Z.H.; Huang, J.; Zeng, G.M.; Wang, L.K.; Yang, J. Application of cetyltrimethylammonium bromide bentonite–titanium dioxide photocatalysis technology for pretreatment of aging leachate. J. Hazard. Mater. 2014, 275, 63–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Pellenz, L.; Borba, F.H.; Daroit, D.J.; Lassen, M.F.M.; Baroni, S.; Zorzo, C.F.; Guimarães, R.E.; Espinoza-Quiñones, F.R.; Seibert, D. Landfill leachate treatment by a boron-doped diamond-based photo-electro-Fenton system integrated with biological oxidation: A toxicity, genotoxicity and by products assessment. J. Environ. Manag. 2020, 264, 110473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Gu, Z.; Chen, W.; Wang, F.; Li, Q. A pilot-scale comparative study of bioreactor landfills for leachate decontamination and municipal solid waste stabilization. Waste Manag. 2020, 103, 113–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Agdag, O.N.; Aktas, D.; Simsek, O. Effects of Different Seed Substances on Anaerobic Degradation of Municipal Solid Waste in Recirculated Bioreactor. Waste Biomass-Valoriz. 2021, 12, 383–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ministry of Environmental Protection of the People’s Republic of China. Standard for pollution control on the landfill site of the MSW; Ministry of Environmental Protection of the People’s Republic of China: Beijing, China, 2008.
  29. Wu, C.; Shen, L.; Zhang, Y.-C.; Huang, Q. Solvothermal synthesis of Cr-doped ZnO nanowires with visible light-driven photocatalytic activity. Mater. Lett. 2011, 65, 1794–1796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Sun, X.; Zhang, H.; Cheng, Z. Use of bioreactor landfill for nitrogen removal to enhance methane production through ex situ simultaneous nitrification-denitrification and in situ denitrification. Waste Manag. 2017, 66, 97–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. He, J.; Yang, J.; Jiang, F.; Liu, P.; Zhu, M. Photo-assisted peroxymonosulfate activation via 2D/2D heterostructure of Ti3C2/g-C3N4 for degradation of diclofenac. Chemosphere 2020, 258, 127339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Elleuch, L.; Messaoud, M.; Djebali, K.; Attafi, M.; Cherni, Y.; Kasmi, M.; Elaoud, A.; Trabelsi, I.; Chatti, A. A new insight into highly contaminated landfill leachate treatment using Kefir grains pre-treatment combined with Ag-doped TiO2 photocatalytic process. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 382, 121119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ebrahimian, A. Silver Doped TiO2 Nanoparticles: Preparation, Characterization and Efficient Degradation of 2,4-dichlorophenol Under Visible Light. J. Water Environ. Nanotechnol. 2016, 1, 135–144. [Google Scholar]
  34. Xu, C.; Yang, F.; Deng, B.; Zhuang, Y.; Li, D.; Liu, B.; Yang, W.; Li, Y. Ti3C2/TiO2 nanowires with excellent photocatalytic performance for selective oxidation of aromatic alcohols to aldehydes. J. Catal. 2020, 383, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Peng, C.; Wang, H.; Yu, H.; Peng, F. (111) TiO2-x/Ti3C2: Synergy of active facets, interfacial charge transfer and Ti3+ doping for enhance photocatalytic activity. Mater. Res. Bull. 2017, 89, 16–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Lv, K.; Zuo, H.; Sun, J.; Deng, K.; Liu, S.; Li, X.; Wang, D. (Bi, C and N) codoped TiO2 nanoparticles. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 161, 396–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Hassan, M.; Zhao, Y.; Xie, B. Employing TiO2 photocatalysis to deal with landfill leachate: Current status and development. Chem. Eng. J. 2016, 285, 264–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Azadi, S.; Karimi-Jashni, A.; Javadpour, S.; Amiri, H. Photocatalytic treatment of landfill leachate: A comparison between N-, P-, and N-P-type TiO2 nanoparticles. Environ. Technol. Innov. 2020, 19, 100985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Qazaq, A.; Hudaya, T.; Lee, I.; Sulidis, A.; Adesina, A. Photoremediation of natural leachate from a municipal solid waste site in a pilot-scale bubble column reactor. Catal. Commun. 2007, 8, 1917–1922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Rojviroon, O.; Rojviroon, T.; Sirivithayapakorn, S. Removal of Color and Chemical Oxygen Demand from Landfill Leachate by Photocatalytic Process with AC/TiO2. Energy Procedia 2015, 79, 536–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Jyothi, K.; Yesodharan, S.; Yesodharan, E. Ultrasound (US), Ultraviolet light (UV) and combination (US + UV) assisted semiconductor catalysed degradation of organic pollutants in water: Oscillation in the concentration of hydrogen peroxide formed in situ. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2014, 21, 1787–1796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Youngman, F. Optimization of TiO2 Photocatalyst in an Advanced Oxidation Process for the Treatment of Landfill Leachate. Ph.D. Thesis, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  43. Miao, Z.; Wang, G.; Li, L.; Wang, C.; Zhang, X. Fabrication of black TiO2/TiO2 homojunction for enhanced photocatalytic degradation. J. Mater. Sci. 2019, 54, 14320–14329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Jia, C.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, C.; Qin, Q. UV-TiO2 Photocatalytic Degradation of Landfill Leachate. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2011, 217, 375–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Wiszniowski, J.; Robert, D.; Surmacz-Górska, J.; Miksch, K.; Malato, S.; Weber, J.-V. Solar photocatalytic degradation of humic acids as a model of organic compounds of landfill leachate in pilot-plant experiments: Influence of inorganic salts. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2004, 53, 127–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. He, X.; Mitrano, D.M.; Nowack, B.; Bahk, Y.K.; Figi, R.; Schreiner, C.; Bürki, M.; Wang, J. Agglomeration potential of TiO2 in synthetic leachates made from the fly ash of different incinerated wastes. Environ. Pollut. 2017, 223, 616–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Anpo, M.; Kamat, P.V. Environmentally Benign Photocatalysts; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  48. Chen, C.-Y. Photocatalytic Degradation of Azo Dye Reactive Orange 16 by TiO2. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2009, 202, 335–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Hassan, M.; Wang, X.; Wang, F.; Wu, D.; Hussain, A.; Xie, B. Coupling ARB-based biological and photochemical (UV/TiO2 and UV/S2O82−) techniques to deal with sanitary landfill leachate. Waste Manag. 2017, 63, 292–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Boonnorat, J.; Honda, R.; Panichnumsin, P.; Boonapatcharoen, N.; Yenjam, N.; Krasaesueb, C.; Wachirawat, M.; Seemuang-On, S.; Jutakanoke, R.; Teeka, J.; et al. Treatment efficiency and greenhouse gas emissions of non-floating and floating bed activated sludge system with acclimatized sludge treating landfill leachate. Bioresour. Technol. 2021, 330, 124952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Guo, X.; Li, B.; Zhao, R.; Zhang, J.; Lin, L.; Zhang, G.; Li, R.-H.; Liu, J.; Li, P.; Li, Y.; et al. Performance and bacterial community of moving bed biofilm reactors with various biocarriers treating primary wastewater effluent with a low organic strength and low C/N ratio. Bioresour. Technol. 2019, 287, 121424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Gomes, A.I.; Foco, M.L.; Vieira, E.; Cassidy, J.; Silva, T.F.; Fonseca, A.; Saraiva, I.; Boaventura, R.A.; Vilar, V.J. Multistage treatment technology for leachate from mature urban landfill: Full scale operation performance and challenges. Chem. Eng. J. 2019, 376, 120573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Gogina, E.; Gulshin, I. Simultaneous Nitrification and Denitrification with Low Dissolved Oxygen Level and C/N ratio. Procedia Eng. 2016, 153, 189–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Liu, T.; He, X.; Jia, G.; Xu, J.; Quan, X.; You, S. Simultaneous nitrification and denitrification process using novel sur-face-modified suspended carriers for the treatment of real domestic wastewater. Chemosphere 2020, 247, 125831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Gomes, A.I.; Soares, T.F.; Silva, T.F.; Boaventura, R.A.; Vilar, V.J. Ozone-driven processes for mature urban landfill leachate treatment: Organic matter degradation, biodegradability enhancement and treatment costs for different reactors configuration. Sci. Total. Environ. 2020, 724, 138083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Abu Amr, S.S.; Aziz, H.A.; Adlan, M.N.; Aziz, S.Q. Effect of Ozone and Ozone/Fenton in the Advanced Oxidation Process on Biodegradable Characteristics of Semi-aerobic Stabilized Leachate. Clean-Soil Air Water 2012, 41, 148–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Colombo, A.; Módenes, A.N.; Trigueros, D.E.G.; da Costa, S.I.G.; Borba, F.; Espinoza-Quiñones, F.R. Treatment of sanitary landfill leachate by the combination of photo-Fenton and biological processes. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 214, 145–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Processes 09 00946 g001 550
Figure 1. Schematic of the experimental setup.
Figure 1. Schematic of the experimental setup.
Processes 09 00946 g001
Processes 09 00946 g002 550
Figure 2. Schematic of bioreactor landfill (a), combined bioreactor landfill (b).
Figure 2. Schematic of bioreactor landfill (a), combined bioreactor landfill (b).
Processes 09 00946 g002
Processes 09 00946 g003 550
Figure 3. Effect of photocatalysts prepared at different temperature (a) and the different ratio of titanium to urea (b) on degradation rate of methyl orange concentration.
Figure 3. Effect of photocatalysts prepared at different temperature (a) and the different ratio of titanium to urea (b) on degradation rate of methyl orange concentration.
Processes 09 00946 g003
Processes 09 00946 g004 550
Figure 4. SEM images (a) and EDS elemental mapping analysis (b), XRD patterns (c,d), FTIR patterns (e,f) during TiO2 nanoparticles.
Figure 4. SEM images (a) and EDS elemental mapping analysis (b), XRD patterns (c,d), FTIR patterns (e,f) during TiO2 nanoparticles.
Processes 09 00946 g004
Processes 09 00946 g005 550
Figure 5. Effects of irradiation time (a), TiO2 dosage (b,c) and initial pH (d,e) on COD concentration, removal and color removal.
Figure 5. Effects of irradiation time (a), TiO2 dosage (b,c) and initial pH (d,e) on COD concentration, removal and color removal.
Processes 09 00946 g005
Processes 09 00946 g006 550
Figure 6. NH4+–N concentration and removal (a), NO3−–N concentration (b) NO2−–N concentration (c), COD concentration and removal (d) of leachates.
Figure 6. NH4+–N concentration and removal (a), NO3−–N concentration (b) NO2−–N concentration (c), COD concentration and removal (d) of leachates.
Processes 09 00946 g006
Processes 09 00946 g007 550
Figure 7. TiO2 recycling treatment effect.
Figure 7. TiO2 recycling treatment effect.
Processes 09 00946 g007
Processes 09 00946 g008 550
Figure 8. SEM images (a), XRD patterns (b) and FTIR patterns (c) of TiO2 nanoparticles before and after photocatalysis.
Figure 8. SEM images (a), XRD patterns (b) and FTIR patterns (c) of TiO2 nanoparticles before and after photocatalysis.
Processes 09 00946 g008
Table
Table 1. The indicators of each reactor after acclimation.
Table 1. The indicators of each reactor after acclimation.
NH4+–N (mg/L)NO3–N (mg/L)NO2–N (mg/L)COD (mg/L)
C5.45718.2090.079245.302
D1.04918.2260.017185.955
E18.4048.52280.281146.390
F1.04918.2760.281126.607
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, C.; Sun, X.; Shan, H.; Zhang, H.; Xi, B. Degradation of Landfill Leachate Using UV-TiO2 Photocatalysis Combination with Aged Waste Reactors. Processes 2021, 9, 946. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9060946

AMA Style

Wang C, Sun X, Shan H, Zhang H, Xi B. Degradation of Landfill Leachate Using UV-TiO2 Photocatalysis Combination with Aged Waste Reactors. Processes. 2021; 9(6):946. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9060946

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Chunlian, Xiaojie Sun, Huijun Shan, Hongxia Zhang, and Beidou Xi. 2021. "Degradation of Landfill Leachate Using UV-TiO2 Photocatalysis Combination with Aged Waste Reactors" Processes 9, no. 6: 946. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9060946

APA Style

Wang, C., Sun, X., Shan, H., Zhang, H., & Xi, B. (2021). Degradation of Landfill Leachate Using UV-TiO2 Photocatalysis Combination with Aged Waste Reactors. Processes, 9(6), 946. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9060946

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop