Next Article in Journal
Isolation, Identification, and Optimization of γ-Aminobutyric Acid (GABA)-Producing Bacillus cereus Strain KBC from a Commercial Soy Sauce moromi in Submerged-Liquid Fermentation
Next Article in Special Issue
Carbon Sequestration in Support of the “4 per 1000” Initiative Using Compost and Stable Biochar from Hazelnut Shells and Sunflower Husks
Previous Article in Journal
Improved Dye Removal Ability of Modified Rice Husk with Effluent from Alkaline Scouring Based on the Circular Economy Concept
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Potentiality of Rice Husk-Derived Activated Carbon: From Synthesis to Application
Open AccessFeature PaperReview

Efficacies of Carbon-Based Adsorbents for Carbon Dioxide Capture

1
Department of Chemistry, Sogang University, Seoul 04107, Korea
2
Chemistry Discipline, Khulna University, Khulna 9208, Bangladesh
3
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology, Gwangju 500-712, Korea
4
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Korea University, Seoul 02841, Korea
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Processes 2020, 8(6), 654; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr8060654
Received: 8 April 2020 / Revised: 21 May 2020 / Accepted: 27 May 2020 / Published: 30 May 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Carbonaceous Materials for CO2 Capture and Pollutants Removal)
Carbon dioxide (CO2), a major greenhouse gas, capture has recently become a crucial technological solution to reduce atmospheric emissions from fossil fuel burning. Thereafter, many efforts have been put forwarded to reduce the burden on climate change by capturing and separating CO2, especially from larger power plants and from the air through the utilization of different technologies (e.g., membrane, absorption, microbial, cryogenic, chemical looping, and so on). Those technologies have often suffered from high operating costs and huge energy consumption. On the right side, physical process, such as adsorption, is a cost-effective process, which has been widely used to adsorb different contaminants, including CO2. Henceforth, this review covered the overall efficacies of CO2 adsorption from air at 196 K to 343 K and different pressures by the carbon-based materials (CBMs). Subsequently, we also addressed the associated challenges and future opportunities for CBMs. According to this review, the efficacies of various CBMs for CO2 adsorption have followed the order of carbon nanomaterials (i.e., graphene, graphene oxides, carbon nanotubes, and their composites) < mesoporous -microporous or hierarchical porous carbons < biochar and activated biochar < activated carbons. View Full-Text
Keywords: CO2 capture; activated carbon; carbon nanomaterials; adsorption; surface area CO2 capture; activated carbon; carbon nanomaterials; adsorption; surface area
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Khandaker, T.; Hossain, M.S.; Dhar, P.K.; Rahman, M..S.; Hossain, M..A.; Ahmed, M.B. Efficacies of Carbon-Based Adsorbents for Carbon Dioxide Capture. Processes 2020, 8, 654. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr8060654

AMA Style

Khandaker T, Hossain MS, Dhar PK, Rahman MS, Hossain MA, Ahmed MB. Efficacies of Carbon-Based Adsorbents for Carbon Dioxide Capture. Processes. 2020; 8(6):654. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr8060654

Chicago/Turabian Style

Khandaker, Tasmina; Hossain, Muhammad S.; Dhar, Palash K.; Rahman, Md. S.; Hossain, Md. A.; Ahmed, Mohammad B. 2020. "Efficacies of Carbon-Based Adsorbents for Carbon Dioxide Capture" Processes 8, no. 6: 654. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr8060654

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop