Next Article in Journal
Biomaterial Implants in Abdominal Wall Hernia Repair: A Review on the Importance of the Peritoneal Interface
Next Article in Special Issue
Availability Assessment of IMA System Based on Model-Based Safety Analysis Using AltaRica 3.0
Previous Article in Journal
Scheduling of Energy-Integrated Batch Process Systems Using a Pattern-Based Framework
Previous Article in Special Issue
Model-Based Stochastic Fault Detection and Diagnosis of Lithium-Ion Batteries
Article Menu
Issue 2 (February) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Processes 2019, 7(2), 104;

Profile Monitoring for Autocorrelated Reflow Processes with Small Samples

Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, National Taipei University of Technology, Taipei City 10608, Taiwan
Department of Information Management, Lunghwa University of Science and Technology, Guishan, Taoyuan County 33306, Taiwan
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 12 January 2019 / Revised: 2 February 2019 / Accepted: 12 February 2019 / Published: 15 February 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Optimization for Control, Observation and Safety)
Full-Text   |   PDF [2757 KB, uploaded 23 February 2019]   |  


The methodology of profile monitoring combines both the model fitting and statistical process control (SPC) techniques. Over the past ten years, a variety of profile monitoring methods have been proposed and extensively investigated in terms of different process profiles. However, monitoring tasks still exhibit a primary problem in that the errors surrounding the functional relationship are frequently assumed to be independent within every single profile. However, the assumption of independence is an unrealistic assumption in many practical instances. In particular, within-profile autocorrelation often occurs in the profile data. To mitigate the within-profile autocorrelation, a monitoring method incorporating an autoregressive (AR)(1) model to cope with autocorrelation is proposed. In this paper, the reflow process with small samples in surface mount technology (SMT) is investigated. In Phase I, three different process models are compared in combination with the first-order autoregressive model, while an appropriate profile model is sought. The Hotelling T2 and exponentially weighted moving average (EWMA) control charts are used together to monitor the parameter estimates (i.e., profile shape) and residuals (i.e., profile variability), respectively. View Full-Text
Keywords: profile monitoring; polynomial regression model; sum of sine function; Hotelling’s T2 control chart; EWMA control chart profile monitoring; polynomial regression model; sum of sine function; Hotelling’s T2 control chart; EWMA control chart

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Fan, S.-K.S.; Jen, C.-H.; Lee, J.-X. Profile Monitoring for Autocorrelated Reflow Processes with Small Samples. Processes 2019, 7, 104.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Processes EISSN 2227-9717 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top