Next Article in Journal
Shale Gas Sweet Spot Prediction and Optimal Well Deployment in the Wufeng–Longmaxi Formation of the Anchang Syncline, Northern Guizhou
Next Article in Special Issue
Dynamic Electric Field Assisted CO2 Methanation
Previous Article in Journal
Mathematical Morphology-Based Fault Diagnosis for Rotating Machinery: A Review
Previous Article in Special Issue
Review of Biomass Gasification Technologies with a Particular Focus on a Downdraft Gasifier
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Simulation Study, Techno-Economic, and Environmental Assessment of Hydrogen-Based DRI Production for Sustainable Steel Industry

1
School of Chemical Engineering, University of Ulsan, Daehak-ro 93, Nam-gu, Ulsan 44610, Republic of Korea
2
Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Pusan National University, Busan 46241, Republic of Korea
3
Hydrogen Ironmaking Research Group, POSCO Research Laboratories, 6261 Donghaean-ro, Nam-gu, Pohang 37859, Republic of Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Processes 2026, 14(4), 651; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr14040651
Submission received: 31 December 2025 / Revised: 30 January 2026 / Accepted: 11 February 2026 / Published: 13 February 2026

Abstract

The iron and steel industry is a major contributor to global carbon emissions, necessitating an urgent transition to sustainable production technologies. This study investigates the techno-economic feasibility and environmental impact of a hydrogen-based direct reduced iron (DRI) production process via multi-stage fluidized bed reactors, focusing on the ironmaking stage and excluding downstream steelmaking routes. A comprehensive process model was developed incorporating reduction kinetics and validated against experimental data, achieving high predictive accuracy with an R2 exceeding 0.999. The environmental assessment reveals that the renewable energy-based scenario achieves specific CO2 equivalent (CO2e) emissions of 36.8 kg per ton of hematite, corresponding to a 98.1% reduction compared to the conventional blast furnace baseline. Although the initial techno-economic analysis indicates a higher unit production cost of 636.83 USD/ton due to renewable energy costs, the sensitivity analysis demonstrates that cost competitiveness against the natural gas-based scenario is secured at a carbon price threshold of 1.44 USD/tCO2e. Furthermore, under the 2018 average Korea Emission Trading System price of 20.66 USD/tCO2e, the cost deceases to 589.76 USD/ton, offering a 7.39% economic advantage over the grid-based alternative. These findings indicate that green hydrogen integration and carbon pricing can bridge economic gaps, supporting economically viable low-carbon DRI production.
Keywords: ironmaking technology; DRI production; process simulation; techno-economic analysis; environmental impact; carbon credit ironmaking technology; DRI production; process simulation; techno-economic analysis; environmental impact; carbon credit

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kim, Y.R.; Lee, J.C.; Son, S.H.; Yoon, S.; Jeong, D.H. Simulation Study, Techno-Economic, and Environmental Assessment of Hydrogen-Based DRI Production for Sustainable Steel Industry. Processes 2026, 14, 651. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr14040651

AMA Style

Kim YR, Lee JC, Son SH, Yoon S, Jeong DH. Simulation Study, Techno-Economic, and Environmental Assessment of Hydrogen-Based DRI Production for Sustainable Steel Industry. Processes. 2026; 14(4):651. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr14040651

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kim, Yoo Ri, Jeong Cheol Lee, Sang Hwan Son, Shikyung Yoon, and Dong Hwi Jeong. 2026. "Simulation Study, Techno-Economic, and Environmental Assessment of Hydrogen-Based DRI Production for Sustainable Steel Industry" Processes 14, no. 4: 651. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr14040651

APA Style

Kim, Y. R., Lee, J. C., Son, S. H., Yoon, S., & Jeong, D. H. (2026). Simulation Study, Techno-Economic, and Environmental Assessment of Hydrogen-Based DRI Production for Sustainable Steel Industry. Processes, 14(4), 651. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr14040651

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop