Next Article in Journal
Characteristics and Reservoir Evaluation of Sinian Microbial Dolomites in the Kepin Area, Tarim Basin
Previous Article in Journal
Synthesis and Comparative Evaluation of Poly(mandelic acid) Prepared by Melt Polycondensation, Azeotropic Polycondensation, and Steglich Polyesterification
Previous Article in Special Issue
Sorghum and Wheat-Based Extruded Aquatic Feed—Impact of Drying Parameters on Pellet Quality and Energy Efficiency
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Editorial: Advances in Drying Kinetics and Quality Control in Food Processing, 2nd Edition

by
Won Byong Yoon
1,2,3
1
Department of Food Science and Biotechnology, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon 24341, Republic of Korea
2
Elder-Friendly Food Research Center, Agriculture and Life Science Research Institute, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon 24341, Republic of Korea
3
Department of Food Biotechnology and Environmental Science, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon 24341, Republic of Korea
Processes 2026, 14(12), 1894; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr14121894
Submission received: 28 May 2026 / Accepted: 4 June 2026 / Published: 10 June 2026
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Drying Kinetics and Quality Control in Food Processing, 2nd Edition)

1. Introduction

The second edition of the Special Issue, “Drying Kinetics and Quality Control in Food Processing”, serves as a comprehensive platform for discussing the latest innovations in dehydration technologies. Drying is not merely a method of preservation but a sophisticated thermal process that significantly influences the structural, nutritional, and sensorial attributes of food products. As the global food industry moves toward sustainability and precision manufacturing, understanding the interplay between drying kinetics and final product quality has never been more critical [1,2]. This collection of 10 papers explores diverse matrices—from fruits and root vegetables to aquatic feed and industrial systems—utilizing advanced modeling, non-thermal pre-treatments, and artificial intelligence.

2. Smart Optimization and Digital Transformation

A standout theme in this edition is the shift toward “Food Industry 4.0,” characterized by the integration of advanced computational tools [3,4]. Jia et al. [5] demonstrated the power of deep learning by employing Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks to predict the moisture and color kinetics of apple slices, offering a robust alternative to traditional empirical models. This approach aligns with the rapidly growing body of literature demonstrating LSTM’s effectiveness for time-series prediction in dynamic food-processing environments: Zhang et al. [6] showed that an LSTM-based deep learning architecture for complex grain drying processes successfully achieved real-time prediction of moisture content with high accuracy. In a parallel study on process monitoring, Guo et al. [7] integrated convolutional neural networks with attention-based LSTM models for predicting state parameters in industrial thermal treatments, obtaining reliable R2 values and underscoring the potential of hybrid deep-learning frameworks.
Similarly, Oyinloye et al. [8] utilized K-means clustering and morphological grading to optimize steaming conditions for Platycodon grandiflorus, showcasing how machine vision can standardize quality in traditional herbal processing. Furthermore, the work of Metzner and Dacanal [9] on monitoring fluidized beds via acoustic emissions and neural networks proves that real-time, non-invasive sensing is becoming essential for industrial drying consistency. These computational strategies exemplify the broader trajectory of Food Industry 4.0, in which AI-driven monitoring and IoT-connected sensing enable precision drying [3,4].

3. Innovative Pre-Treatments and Intensification Technologies

Enhancing mass transfer while preserving bioactive compounds remains a central challenge. Lin et al. [10] investigated the effects of stabilized sound pressure in multiple-frequency ultrasonic-assisted osmotic dehydration (UAOD) for pineapple slices, finding that precise acoustic control significantly improves efficiency. In a similar vein, Yilmaz et al. [11] explored the synergy between ultrasound pre-treatment and various drying methods for blood oranges, highlighting how non-thermal interventions can drastically reduce drying time and energy consumption.
These findings are consistent with recent evidence: Ahmad et al. [12] reviewed how ultrasound enhances mass transfer rates and product color across various food matrices during dehydration. Complementarily, Wang et al. [13] reported that ultrasonic pre-treatments effectively disrupted internal resistance and modified microstructure, shortening total freeze-drying times for delicate horticultural products. Collectively, these studies reinforce the consensus that non-thermal intensification technologies can reduce processing time by 20–55% while significantly improving bioactive retention [14], making them essential tools for sustainable food drying.

4. Mathematical Modeling and Kinetic Insights

Predictive accuracy is fundamental to scaling drying processes. Kheredine et al. [15] provided a sophisticated mechanistic view using Lattice Boltzmann simulations coupled with Weibull-based kinetics to describe carrot drying. These theoretical frameworks are complemented by the detailed experimental kinetic studies of Uribe et al. [16] on vacuum-dried cauliflower and Rudy et al. [17] on Jerusalem artichoke, both of which emphasize the critical balance between temperature, vacuum pressure, and the retention of antioxidant properties.
The shift toward physics-based modeling is well supported: de Oliveira et al. [18] demonstrated that physics-informed neural networks (PINN) and advanced machine learning models can accurately predict complex moisture diffusion and drying behavior in plant-based biological materials. In a more applied direction, Rojas et al. [19] evaluated the mathematical modeling of vacuum drying for functional vegetables like red cabbage, finding that thin-layer kinetic equations best described the drying curves and that specific bioactive compounds were optimally retained under controlled low-temperature regimes. Together, these contributions highlight the importance of coupling kinetic model selection with targeted quality outcomes.

5. Quality Control and Energy Efficiency in Industrial Applications

Sustainability in food engineering is inextricably linked to energy management and product functionality. Jiménez-Rodríguez et al. [20] analyzed the temperature effects on cocoa drying, specifically focusing on energy consumption and bioactive stability. This finding is reinforced by Pita-Garcia et al. [21], who showed that combining hybrid solar-convective drying setups can drastically reduce conventional energy consumption while preserving premium product quality. For the feed industry, Graff et al. [22] explored how drying parameters influence the physical durability and energy efficiency of extruded aquatic feed. This industrial-scale concern is echoed by Cheng et al. [23], who successfully applied rheological and viscosity modeling to predict extruded aquafeed physical quality and structural stability—a significant step toward quality-assured industrial feed manufacturing.

6. Conclusions and Future Perspectives

The 10 contributions in this Special Issue underline that the future of food drying lies in the convergence of AI-driven prediction, innovative non-thermal intensification, and mechanistic modeling. These studies collectively move the field closer to achieving high-efficiency drying systems that do not compromise the nutritional or sensorial integrity of the food. Looking ahead, the integration of digital twin frameworks and physics-informed machine learning holds particular promise for bridging laboratory-scale insights with industrial-scale process control [3,4,18].

Funding

This research was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF), funded by the Ministry of Education (NRF2018R1D1A3B06042501).

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Mujumdar, A.S. Handbook of Industrial Drying, 4th ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Defraeye, T. Advanced computational modelling for drying processes—A review. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2014, 35, 69–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Hassoun, A.; Jagtap, S.; Trollman, H.; Garcia-Garcia, G.; Duong, L.N.K.; Saxena, P.; Bouzembrak, Y.; Treiblmaier, H.; Parra-López, C.; Carmona-Torres, C.; et al. From Food Industry 4.0 to Food Industry 5.0: Identifying technological enablers and potential future applications in the food sector. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2024, 23, e70040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Hassoun, A.; Aït-Kaddour, A.; Dankar, I.; Safarov, J.; Ozogul, F.; Sultanova, S. The significance of Industry 4.0 technologies in enhancing various unit operations applied in the food sector: Focus on food drying. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2025, 18, 109–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Jia, Z.; Liu, Y.; Xiao, H. Deep learning prediction of moisture and color kinetics of apple slices by long short-term memory as affected by blanching and hot-air drying conditions. Processes 2024, 12, 1724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zhang, Y.; Fang, Z.; Li, C.; Li, C. Deep-learning-based model predictive control of an industrial-scale multistate counter-flow paddy drying process. Foods 2024, 13, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Guo, J.; Wu, J.; Zhang, L.; Peng, Z.; Wei, L.; Li, W.; Shen, J.; Liu, Y. Integrating a convolutional neural network and multihead attention with long short-term memory for real-time control during drying: A case study of yuba (tofu skin). Foods 2026, 15, 245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Oyinloye, T.M.; An, S.; Cho, C.-W.; Yoon, W.B. Optimization of steaming conditions for bellflower root (Platycodon grandiflorus) using K-means clustering-based morphological grading system. Processes 2024, 12, 2347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Metzner, W.V.; Dacanal, G.C. Monitoring agitation intensity in fluidized beds containing inert particles via acoustic emissions and neural networks. Processes 2024, 12, 2691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lin, Y.-W.; Yao, Y.-A.; Huang, D.-W.; Chen, C.-J.; Huang, P.-H. Modifications on the processing parameters of traditional pineapple slices by stabilized sound pressure of multiple frequency ultrasonic-assisted osmotic dehydration. Processes 2024, 12, 1109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Yilmaz, D.; Tekin-Cakmak, Z.H.; Karasu, S. Impact of ultrasound pretreatment and temperature on drying kinetics and quality characteristics of blood orange slices: Comparison with different drying methods. Processes 2025, 13, 1596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ahmad, F.; Mohammad, Z.H.; Zaidi, S.; Ibrahim, S.A. A comprehensive review on the application of ultrasound for the preservation of fruits and vegetables. J. Food Process Eng. 2023, 46, e14291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wang, J.; Liu, C.; Zheng, L. Effect of ultrasound-assisted osmotic dehydration on the drying characteristics and quality properties of goji. J. Food Process Eng. 2024, 47, e14620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zhao, W.; Chen, Z.; Lin, X.; Zhang, Y. A meta-analysis of the effects of ultrasonic pretreatment on the characteristics of dried fruits and vegetables. J. Food Process Eng. 2024, 47, e14689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kheredine, M.; Hamdi, M.; Mihoubi, D. Mechanistic modeling of carrot slice drying: Lattice Boltzmann simulation coupled with Weibull-based quality kinetics. Processes 2026, 14, 1169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Uribe, E.; López, J.; Vega-Gálvez, A. Drying kinetics and variations in chemical and antioxidant properties of cauliflower (Brassica oleracea L. var. botrytis) at different vacuum drying temperatures. Processes 2026, 14, 1336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Rudy, S.; Dziki, D.; Biernacka, B. Drying kinetics and physicochemical characteristics of dehydrated Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.). Processes 2025, 13, 2553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Barnard, J.E.; Chew, Y.J.; Perera, S.; Şimşek, Ö.; Balquis, K.; Barker, J. Accelerated modelling of moisture diffusion controlled drying using coupled physics-informed neural networks. Food Bioprod. Process. 2024, 145, 67–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Rojas, M.; Vega-Gálvez, A.; Araya, M.; Pasten, A.; Uribe, E.; Camus, J.; Mejias, N.; Alfaro, A.; Romero, J. Exploring the potential of low-temperature vacuum drying for red cabbage: Focus on bioactive compound retention and associated antioxidant, cytotoxic, and antimicrobial properties. J. Food Sci. 2026, 89, e70825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Jiménez-Rodríguez, D.J.; García-Alamilla, P.; Márquez-Rocha, F.J. Temperature effect of cocoa (Theobroma cacao L.) drying on energy consumption, bioactive composition and vibrational changes. Processes 2024, 12, 2523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Pita-Garcia, J.; Reinoso-Tigre, J.; Palacios-Ponce, S.; Delgado-Plaza, E.; Coello-Montoya, D.; Salazar, R.; Coronel-León, J.; Peralta, J.; Cornejo, F. Impact of combined sun and hybrid drying technologies on cocoa drying process and quality. Heliyon 2025, 11, e42884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Graff, T.; Maichel, E.; Alavi, S. Sorghum and wheat-based extruded aquatic feed: Impact of processing parameters on pellet quality. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2026, 14, 1541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Cheng, H.; Samuelsen, T.A.; Sørensen, M.; Li, J. Prediction of extruded aquafeed physical quality parameters through a dough viscosity model. J. Food Process Eng. 2024, 47, e14604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yoon, W.B. Editorial: Advances in Drying Kinetics and Quality Control in Food Processing, 2nd Edition. Processes 2026, 14, 1894. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr14121894

AMA Style

Yoon WB. Editorial: Advances in Drying Kinetics and Quality Control in Food Processing, 2nd Edition. Processes. 2026; 14(12):1894. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr14121894

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yoon, Won Byong. 2026. "Editorial: Advances in Drying Kinetics and Quality Control in Food Processing, 2nd Edition" Processes 14, no. 12: 1894. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr14121894

APA Style

Yoon, W. B. (2026). Editorial: Advances in Drying Kinetics and Quality Control in Food Processing, 2nd Edition. Processes, 14(12), 1894. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr14121894

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop