Corrosion Evolution and Mechanisms of N80 Steel in H2S/CO2 Coexisting Systems Under Simulated CCUS-EGR Dynamic Environments
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Experimental Section
2.1. Experimental Conditions
2.2. Materials and Solutions
2.3. High-Temperature High-Pressure (HTHP) Immersion Tests
2.4. Surface Characterization Techniques
2.5. Grey Relational Analysis (GRA)
3. Results
3.1. Corrosion Kinetics
3.1.1. Effect of Temperature
3.1.2. Effect of PCO2/PH2S Ratio
3.1.3. Effect of Flow Rate
3.2. Results of Grey Relational Analysis
3.3. Surface Morphology and Elemental Composition
3.3.1. Effect of Temperature on Surface Morphology
3.3.2. Effect of CO2/H2S Partial Pressure Ratio on Surface Morphology
3.3.3. Effect of Flow Rate on Surface Morphology
3.4. Phase Composition of Corrosion Scales
3.4.1. Effect of Temperature on Phase Composition
3.4.2. Effect of Partial Pressure Ratio on Phase Composition
3.4.3. Effect of Flow Rate on Phase Composition
3.5. Three-Dimensional Morphological Characteristics of Localized Corrosion
3.5.1. Effect of Temperature on Pitting Characteristics
3.5.2. Effect of Partial Pressure Ratio on Pitting Characteristics
3.5.3. Effect of Flow Rate on Pitting Characteristics
3.5.4. Correlation Between Pit Depth and Corrosion Rate
4. Discussion
4.1. Competitive Growth Mechanism of Corrosion Scales
4.1.1. Thermodynamic Driving Force Analysis
4.1.2. Effect of Temperature on Film Formation Kinetics
4.1.3. Control of Phase Composition Evolution by Partial Pressure Ratio
4.1.4. Integrated Model of Film Formation Mechanism
4.2. Mechanism of Pitting Initiation and Propagation
4.2.1. Semiconductor Properties and Electrical Conductivity of FeS
4.2.2. “Large Cathode–Small Anode” Galvanic Corrosion Model
4.2.3. Role of Product Film Heterogeneity in Promoting Pitting Initiation
- (1)
- Cracks and pores: As shown in Figure 3a, the product film at 40 °C exhibited obvious crack patterns that directly exposed the underlying substrate metal, serving as preferential sites for anodic dissolution.
- (2)
- FeS/FeCO3 biphasic interfaces: XRD and EDS results indicated that product films under most conditions consisted of mixed FeS and FeCO3. Owing to lattice mismatch and stress concentration, interfaces between the two phases readily developed microcracks or gaps, thereby forming localized occluded zones.
- (3)
- Mechanical erosion defects: Under high-flow conditions (110,000 m3/d), porous FeCO3 was preferentially eroded by fluid flow (Figure 5c, EDS showing S content rising to 32.67%). At erosion sites, the underlying substrate appeared to be directly exposed to corrosive media, while the surrounding compact FeS film acted as a large cathode, driving rapid local dissolution. Three-dimensional morphology revealed that pits under high-flow conditions exhibited a “comet-tail” morphology (Figure 7c), providing direct evidence of directional expansion by fluid erosion.
4.2.4. Temperature Modulation on Pitting Galvanic Effect
- (1)
- Alteration of film compactness: As previously discussed, at 60 °C, the product film was in a “competitive equilibrium” state characterized by low FeS content (12.27%) and a discontinuous distribution, while porous FeCO3 dominated. Although local FeS/substrate galvanic couples existed, the discontinuous FeS film limited its effective cathodic area, resulting in a weak galvanic effect and consequently the lowest pitting rate (0.976 mm/y). Under these conditions, corrosion proceeded primarily via uniform dissolution.
- (2)
- Electrochemical reaction kinetics: Temperature is well known to accelerate electrochemical reaction kinetics. At 80 °C, the rates of both cathodic reduction (Equations (10) and (11)) and anodic oxidation (Equation (12)) are therefore expected to be higher than at lower temperatures. This temperature-accelerated kinetics would, according to the Tafel relationship, enable a higher anodic current density under a given galvanic driving force, providing a plausible explanation for the increased pitting rate. Additionally, the enhanced diffusion of Fe2+ and mass transfer of H+ at elevated temperature would be expected to intensify the autocatalytic process within pits, and these temperature-dependent effects are consistent with the observed maximum pitting depth at 80 °C.
4.2.5. Suppression of Galvanic Effect by Partial Pressure Ratio
4.2.6. Integrated Pitting Mechanism Model
4.3. Effect of Flow Velocity on Product Film Integrity
4.3.1. Hydrodynamic Parameters and Wall Shear Stress
4.3.2. Selective Erosion Mechanism of Product Film
4.3.3. Non-Monotonic Effect of Flow Velocity on Uniform Corrosion
4.3.4. Monotonic Promotion of Pitting by Flow Velocity
4.3.5. Engineering Implications of Flow Velocity Effects
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Arias, P.; Bellouin, N.; Coppola, E.; Jones, R.; Krinner, G.; Marotzke, J.; Naik, V.; Palmer, M.; Plattner, G.K.; Rogelj, J.; et al. Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis; Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; Technical summary; IPCC: Geneva, Switzerland, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Obergassel, W.; Arens, C.; Hermwille, L.; Kreibich, N.; Mersmann, F.; Ott, H.E.; Wang-Helmreich, H. Phoenix from the Ashes: An Analysis of the Paris Agreement to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change; Part 1; Wuppertal Institute: Wuppertal, Germany, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Bouckaert, S.; Pales, A.F.; McGlade, C.; Remme, U.; Wanner, B.; Varro, L.; D’Ambrosio, D.; Spencer, T. Net Zero by 2050: A Roadmap for the Global Energy Sector; IEA: Paris, France, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Barlow, H.; Shahi, S.S.M.; Loughrey, M. State of the Art: CCS Technologies 2023; Global CCS Institute: Brussels, Belgium, 2023; pp. 1–121. [Google Scholar]
- Bui, M.; Adjiman, C.S.; Bardow, A.; Anthony, E.J.; Boston, A.; Brown, S.; Fennell, P.S.; Fuss, S.; Galindo, A.; Hackett, L.A.; et al. Carbon capture and storage (CCS): The way forward. Energy Environ. Sci. 2018, 11, 1062–1176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oldenburg, C.M. Carbon dioxide as cushion gas for natural gas storage. Energy Fuels 2003, 17, 240–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kühn, M.; Tesmer, M.; Pilz, P.; Meyer, R.; Reinicke, K.; Förster, A.; Kolditz, O.; Schäfer, D. CLEAN: Project overview on CO2 large-scale enhanced gas recovery in the Altmark natural gas field (Germany). Environ. Earth Sci. 2012, 67, 311–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pooladi-Darvish, M.; Hong, H.; Theys, S.; Stocker, R.; Bachu, S.; Dashtgard, S. CO2 injection for enhanced gas recovery and geological storage of CO2 in the Long Coulee Glauconite F Pool, Alberta. In Proceedings of the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Denver, CO, USA, 21–24 September 2008. SPE-115789-MS. [Google Scholar]
- Van der Meer, L.G.H.; Kreft, E.; Geel, C.; Hartman, J. K12-B: A test site for CO2 storage and enhanced gas recovery. In Proceedings of the SPE Europec Featured at EAGE Conference and Exhibition, Madrid, Spain, 13–16 June 2005. SPE-94128-MS. [Google Scholar]
- Yong, R. Development status, advantages and challenges of CCUS/CCS in PetroChina Southwest Oil & Gas Field Company. Nat. Gas Ind. 2024, 44, 11–24. [Google Scholar]
- Kharaka, Y.K.; Cole, D.R.; Hovorka, S.D.; Gunter, W.D.; Knauss, K.G.; Freifeld, B.M. Gas–water–rock interactions in Frio Formation following CO2 injection: Implications for the storage of greenhouse gases in sedimentary basins. Geology 2006, 34, 577–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- He, X.X.; Gan, X.F.; Yang, C.C.; Jin, Y.Q.; Zhao, Z.H.; Cao, C.; Zhang, L.H.; Zhao, Y.L. Latest progress of CO2-EGR pilot test in the Wolonghe Gas Field of the Sichuan Basin. Nat. Gas Ind. 2025, 45, 19–32. [Google Scholar]
- Smith, S.N.; Joosten, M.W. Corrosion of carbon steel by H2S in CO2-containing oilfield environments. In Proceedings of the CORROSION 2006, San Diego, CA, USA, 12–16 March 2006; pp. 1–26. [Google Scholar]
- Shoesmith, D.W.; Taylor, P.; Bailey, M.G.; Ikeda, B. Electrochemical behaviour of iron in alkaline sulphide solutions. Electrochim. Acta 1978, 23, 903–916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, H.; Cheng, X.; Li, G.; Chen, S.; Quan, Z.; Zhao, S.; Niu, L. The influence of hydrogen sulfide on corrosion of iron under different conditions. Corros. Sci. 2000, 42, 1669–1683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zheng, Y.; Brown, B.; Nesic, S. Electrochemical study and modeling of H2S corrosion of mild steel. In Proceedings of the CORROSION 2013, Orlando, FL, USA, 17–21 March 2013; pp. 1–22. [Google Scholar]
- Dugstad, A. Fundamental aspects of CO2 metal loss corrosion: Part I: Mechanism. In Proceedings of the CORROSION 2006, San Diego, CA, USA, 12–16 March 2006; pp. 1–18. [Google Scholar]
- Sun, W.; Nešić, S. Kinetics of corrosion layer formation: Part 1—Iron carbonate layers in carbon dioxide corrosion. Corrosion 2008, 64, 334–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, W.; Nešić, S. A mechanistic model of uniform hydrogen sulfide/carbon dioxide corrosion of mild steel. Corrosion 2009, 65, 291–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hua, Y.; Barker, R.; Neville, A. Comparison of corrosion behaviour for X-65 carbon steel in supercritical CO2-saturated water and water-saturated/unsaturated supercritical CO2. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2015, 97, 224–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kermani, M.B.; Morshed, A. Carbon dioxide corrosion in oil and gas production: A compendium. Corrosion 2003, 59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nešić, S. Key issues related to modelling of internal corrosion of oil and gas pipelines—A review. Corros. Sci. 2007, 49, 4308–4338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nyborg, R. Overview of CO2 corrosion models for wells and pipelines. In Proceedings of the NACE International Annual Conference, Denver, CO, USA, 7–12 April 2002; pp. 1–16. [Google Scholar]
- Choi, Y.S.; Nesic, S.; Ling, S. Effect of H2S on the CO2 corrosion of carbon steel in acidic solutions. Electrochim. Acta 2011, 56, 1752–1760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, W.; Nesic, S.; Papavinasam, S. Kinetics of iron sulfide and mixed iron sulfide/carbonate scale precipitation in CO2/H2S corrosion. In Proceedings of the CORROSION 2006, San Diego, CA, USA, 12–16 March 2006; pp. 1–26. [Google Scholar]
- Ning, J.; Zheng, Y.; Young, D.; Brown, B.; Nesic, S. A thermodynamic study of hydrogen sulfide corrosion of mild steel. In Proceedings of the CORROSION 2013, Orlando, FL, USA, 17–21 March 2013; pp. 1–21. [Google Scholar]
- Pots, B.; John, R.C.; Rippon, I.J.; Simon Thomas, M.J.; Kapusta, S.D.; Girgis, M.M.; Whitham, T. Improvements on de Waard–Milliams corrosion prediction and applications to corrosion management. In Proceedings of the CORROSION 2002, Denver, CO, USA, 7–12 April 2002; pp. 1–19. [Google Scholar]
- Sun, W.; Nesic, S.; Woollam, R.C. The effect of temperature and ionic strength on the solubility of iron carbonate (FeCO3). Corros. Sci. 2009, 51, 1630–1639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qiu, Z.; Xiong, C.; Chang, Z.; Zhao, Z.; Zhao, C.; Ye, Z. Major corrosion factors in the CO2 and H2S coexistent environment and the anti-corrosion method: Taking Tazhong 1 gas field, Tarim Basin, as an example. Pet. Explor. Dev. 2012, 39, 238–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, S.; Liu, H.; Bai, Q.; Wang, Y.; Li, X. Dynamic corrosion behavior of P110 steel in simulated oil field CO2/H2S environment. Chem. Eng. Oil Gas 2009, 38, 65–68. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, W.; Zhang, N.; Zhang, Z.; Ding, S.; Ren, C.; Lin, Z.; Gou, D.; Li, L. Corrosion behavior and mechanism of oil casing steel of different materials in CO2/H2S coexistence environment. Surf. Technol. 2025, 54, 37–45. [Google Scholar]
- Lai, Y.; Miao, J. Study on the corrosion of specific materials under conditions with high coexistence of hydrogen sulfide and carbon dioxide. Green Pet. Petrochem. 2025, 10, 50–55. [Google Scholar]
- Gao, K.; Shang, S.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, Y.; Yang, Y.; Li, J. Effect of temperature on corrosion behavior of S135 steel and G105 steel in CO2/H2S coexisting system. Mater. Mech. Eng. 2023, 47, 24–30. [Google Scholar]
- Song, P. Research on Corrosion Behavior of 80S Steel and N80 Steel in CO2/H2S Coexistent Environment. Master’s Thesis, Xi’an Shiyou University, Xi’an, China, 2023. [Google Scholar]
- Song, C.; Song, X.; Chen, Q.; Li, K.; Jia, H.; Li, G. Corrosion behavior and mechanism of 20 steel under CO2/H2S coexisted environment in oil and gas field. Mater. Mech. Eng. 2023, 47, 60–65. [Google Scholar]
- Kakooei, S.; Ismail, M.C.; Ariwahjoedi, B. Mechanisms of microbiologically influenced corrosion: A review. World Appl. Sci. J. 2012, 17, 524. [Google Scholar]
- Parakala, S.R. EIS Investigation of Carbon Dioxide and Hydrogen Sulfide Corrosion Under Film Forming Conditions. Ph.D. Thesis, Ohio University, Athens, OH, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
- Sherar, B.W.A.; Power, I.M.; Keech, P.G.; Mitlin, S.; Southam, G.; Shoesmith, D. Characterizing the effect of carbon steel exposure in sulfide containing solutions to microbially induced corrosion. Corros. Sci. 2011, 53, 955–960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hodgkiess, T.; Neville, A.; Shrestha, S. Electrochemical and mechanical interactions during erosion–corrosion of a high-velocity oxy-fuel coating and a stainless steel. Wear 1999, 233, 623–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barker, R.; Burkle, D.; Charpentier, T.; Thompson, H.; Neville, A. A review of iron carbonate (FeCO3) formation in the oil and gas industry. Corros. Sci. 2018, 142, 312–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pessu, F.; Barker, R.; Neville, A. The influence of pH on localized corrosion behavior of X65 carbon steel in CO2-saturated brines. Corrosion 2015, 71, 1452–1466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Fu, C.; Zheng, J.; Zhao, J.; Xu, W. Application of grey relational analysis for corrosion failure of oil tubes. Corros. Sci. 2001, 43, 881–889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tu, Y.; Xie, C.; Liu, C.; Li, J. Application of grey correlation analysis method in reservoir evaluation of Qingdong SA. Nat. Gas Geosci. 2012, 23, 381–386. [Google Scholar]
- Rickard, D. Reaction pathways in the Fe-S system below 100 °C. Chem. Geol. 2000, 167, 267–293. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, C.C. Experimental Study on the Electrical Conductivity of FeS-Bearing Olivine at High Temperature and Pressure. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Ming, X.; Wang, X.L.; Du, F.; Chen, G.; Wang, C.Z.; Yin, J.W. First-principles study of the high-pressure phase transition and properties of siderite FeCO3. Acta Phys. Sin. 2012, 61, 097102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bai, P. Crystal Evolution of Corrosion Products of Carbon Steel in H2S Environments and Its Influence Mechanism on Corrosion Behavior. Ph.D. Thesis, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing, China, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Mercier-Bion, F.; Li, J.; Lotz, H.; Tortech, L.; Neff, D.; Dillmann, P. Electrical properties of iron corrosion layers formed in anoxic environments at the nanometer scale. Corros. Sci. 2018, 137, 98–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stack, M.M.; Abdulrahman, G.H. Mapping erosion-corrosion of carbon steel in oil exploration conditions: Some new approaches to characterizing mechanisms and synergies. Tribol. Int. 2010, 43, 1268–1277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schmitt, G.; Bosch, C.; Mueller, M.; Siegmund, G. A Probabilistic Model for Flow Induced Localized Corrosion. In Proceedings of the CORROSION 2000, Orlando, FL, USA, 26–31 March 2000. Paper No. C2000-00049. [Google Scholar]










| Element | C | Mn | Si | Mo | Cr | V | P | S | Cu | Ni | Fe |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Content | 0.34 | 1.45 | 0.20 | 0.18 | 0.15 | 0.11 | 0.02 | 0.015 | 0.008 | 0.03 | Balance |
| Chemical Component | Concentration (mg/L) |
|---|---|
| NaCl | 9.945 |
| NaHCO3 | 400.68 |
| Na2SO4 | 142.00 |
| CaCl2 | 5.55 |
| NaBr | 3.09 |
| MgCl2·6H2O | 2.03 |
| Case | Temp (°C) | PCO2/PH2S | Flow Rate (m3/d) | Uniform CR (mm/y) | Standard Deviations of Uniform | Pitting CR (mm/y) | Standard Deviations of Pitting |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 40 | 2.9 | 110,000 | 0.509 | 0.0125 | 1.735 | 0.1001 |
| 2 | 60 | 2.9 | 110,000 | 0.567 | 0.0051 | 0.976 | 0.0365 |
| 3 | 80 | 2.9 | 110,000 | 0.506 | 0.0082 | 2.240 | 0.0890 |
| 4 | 80 | 33.7 | 110,000 | 0.974 | 0.0416 | 1.751 | 0.0802 |
| 5 | 80 | 67.4 | 110,000 | 1.042 | 0.0638 | 1.217 | 0.0605 |
| 6 | 80 | 2.9 | 50,000 | 0.513 | 0.01 | 0.858 | 0.0212 |
| 7 | 80 | 2.9 | 80,000 | 0.559 | 0.0081 | 1.673 | 0.0272 |
| Corrosion Type | Temperature | PCO2/PH2S | Flow Rate | Ranking of Dominant Factors |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Uniform Corrosion | 0.650 | 0.880 | 0.600 | Ratio > Temp. > Flow |
| Pitting Corrosion | 0.858 | 0.626 | 0.892 | Flow > Temp. > Ratio |
| Temp. (°C) | C | O | S | Fe | Si | Mn | Ca | Cr | K | Na |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 40 | 15.08 | 37.43 | 14.19 | 31.55 | 0.45 | 0.30 | - | 0.14 | 0.27 | 0.59 |
| 60 | 12.39 | 30.58 | 12.27 | 43.30 | 0.22 | 1.06 | - | 0.18 | - | - |
| 80 | 13.86 | 20.41 | 29.66 | 35.70 | - | 0.16 | 0.21 | - | - | - |
| PCO2/PH2S | C | O | S | Fe | Si | Mn | Ca | Cr | K | Na |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.9 | 13.86 | 20.41 | 29.66 | 35.70 | - | 0.16 | 0.21 | - | - | - |
| 33.7 | 14.18 | 22.10 | 26.91 | 35.42 | 0.18 | 0.12 | - | 0.11 | 0.23 | 0.75 |
| 67.4 | 12.39 | 48.07 | 7.24 | 31.54 | 0.14 | 0.44 | 0.09 | 0.09 | - | - |
| Flow Rate (m3/d) | C | O | S | Fe | Si | Mn | Ca | Cr | Mg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50,000 | 10.79 | 41.54 | 16.61 | 29.94 | 0.13 | 0.23 | 0.66 | 0.10 | 0.13 |
| 80,000 | 16.13 | 35.64 | 23.02 | 23.40 | - | 0.25 | 1.22 | - | 0.35 |
| 110,000 | 13.62 | 16.33 | 32.67 | 36.64 | 0.16 | - | 0.39 | 0.19 | - |
| Case | Temp. (°C) | PCO2/PH2S | Flow (m3/d) | Max. Depth (μm) | Pitting Rate (mm/y) | Pit Morphology |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 40 | 2.9 | 110,000 | 14.26 | 1.735 | Irregular, shallow dish |
| 2 | 60 | 2.9 | 110,000 | 8.02 | 0.976 | Hemispherical |
| 3 | 80 | 2.9 | 110,000 | 18.41 | 2.240 | Funnel-shaped, deep |
| 4 | 80 | 33.7 | 110,000 | 14.38 | 1.751 | Shallow, wide dish |
| 5 | 80 | 67.4 | 110,000 | 10.00 | 1.217 | Micro-pitting arrays |
| 6 | 80 | 2.9 | 50,000 | 7.05 | 0.858 | Small-area, shallow |
| 7 | 80 | 2.9 | 80,000 | 13.75 | 1.673 | Elliptical, flow-aligned |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Pu, Q.; Xu, J.; Zhao, X.; Qin, Q.; Qing, Y.; Fu, J.; Fan, Z.; Wang, Y.; Liu, H.; Sheng, X. Corrosion Evolution and Mechanisms of N80 Steel in H2S/CO2 Coexisting Systems Under Simulated CCUS-EGR Dynamic Environments. Processes 2026, 14, 1552. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr14101552
Pu Q, Xu J, Zhao X, Qin Q, Qing Y, Fu J, Fan Z, Wang Y, Liu H, Sheng X. Corrosion Evolution and Mechanisms of N80 Steel in H2S/CO2 Coexisting Systems Under Simulated CCUS-EGR Dynamic Environments. Processes. 2026; 14(10):1552. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr14101552
Chicago/Turabian StylePu, Qiang, Ji Xu, Xuefen Zhao, Qifeng Qin, Yong Qing, Juan Fu, Zhiwen Fan, Yangang Wang, Hong Liu, and Xia Sheng. 2026. "Corrosion Evolution and Mechanisms of N80 Steel in H2S/CO2 Coexisting Systems Under Simulated CCUS-EGR Dynamic Environments" Processes 14, no. 10: 1552. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr14101552
APA StylePu, Q., Xu, J., Zhao, X., Qin, Q., Qing, Y., Fu, J., Fan, Z., Wang, Y., Liu, H., & Sheng, X. (2026). Corrosion Evolution and Mechanisms of N80 Steel in H2S/CO2 Coexisting Systems Under Simulated CCUS-EGR Dynamic Environments. Processes, 14(10), 1552. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr14101552
