Next Article in Journal
Content of Phytomelatonin in Acorns (Quercus sp.) in Its Possible Use as a Phytogenic in Animal Nutrition
Previous Article in Journal
Engineered Cu0.5Ni0.5Al2O4/GCN Spinel Nanostructures for Dual-Functional Energy Storage and Electrocatalytic Water Splitting
Previous Article in Special Issue
Vibrational Radiative Double Diffusion in Buongiorno’s Nanofluid Model Within Inclined Chambers Filled with Non-Darcy Porous Elements
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Process Safety Assessment of the Entire Nitration Process of Benzotriazole Ketone

1
College of Safety Science and Engineering, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing 211816, China
2
Jiangsu TaiJieZhiBang Testing Technology Co., Ltd., Nanjing 226009, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Processes 2025, 13(7), 2201; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13072201
Submission received: 29 May 2025 / Revised: 23 June 2025 / Accepted: 7 July 2025 / Published: 9 July 2025

Abstract

To ensure the inherent safety of fine chemical nitration processes, the nitration reaction of benzotriazole ketone was selected as the research object. The thermal decomposition and reaction characteristics of the nitration system were studied using a combination of differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), reaction calorimetry (RC1), and accelerating rate calorimetry (ARC). The results showed that the nitration product released 455.77 kJ/kg of heat upon decomposition, significantly higher than the 306.86 kJ/kg of the original material, indicating increased thermal risk. Through process hazard analysis based on GB/T 42300-2022, key parameters such as the temperature at which the time to maximum rate is 24 h under adiabatic conditions (TD24), maximum temperature of the synthesis reaction (MTSR), and maximum temperature for technical reason (MTT) were determined, and the reaction was classified as hazard level 5, suggesting a high risk of runaway and secondary explosion. Process intensification strategies were then proposed and verified by dynamic calorimetry: the adiabatic temperature increase (ΔTad) was reduced from 86.70 °C in the semi-batch reactor to 19.95 °C in the optimized continuous process, effectively improving thermal safety. These findings provide a reliable reference for the quantitative risk evaluation and safe design of nitration processes in fine chemical manufacturing.

1. Introduction

The loss of control of chemical reactions is one of the main causes of safety accidents in fine chemical enterprises. In order to ensure the smooth operation of enterprise production, it is necessary to conduct material thermal decomposition and reaction heat risk research on fine chemical reactions. Based on the research findings, risk levels should be accurately determined, process parameters optimized, and appropriate control measures rigorously implemented. Fine chemical production frequently involves batch or semi-batch operations. These processes are often complex, variable, and have low automation. In some cases, companies are unaware of the inherent safety risks of chemical reactions. There are problems such as lax process control and insufficient professional knowledge, and the production process is prone to accidents such as fires, explosions, poisoning, and personnel injuries. By conducting safety risk assessments for fine chemical reactions, improving safety facilities, and enhancing risk management, we can enhance the intrinsic safety level of enterprises and effectively prevent and curb the occurrence of safety production accidents [1,2,3].
Nitration reaction is a very important type of chemical reaction in the organic chemical industry. It is widely used in many industries such as pharmaceuticals, spices, pigments, dyes, explosives, and pesticides. Nitration reaction is a fundamental organic chemical unit reaction, which refers to the reaction in which an organic compound introduces one or more nitro groups into its molecular structure under the action of a nitration agent. There are three main sources of thermal hazards in nitration reactions. Firstly, the reaction is highly exothermic, and the product is unstable, which can easily lead to an uncontrolled reaction. Secondly, the decomposition of nitric acid during the reaction usually releases a large amount of heat. Impurities, such as sulfur and organic residues, may catalyze side reactions, further reducing the safety of the nitration reaction system. In addition, insufficient cooling systems and local overheating of reaction equipment during the nitration reaction will also increase the risk of the reaction. The nitration reaction is more dangerous. The exothermic enthalpy of this reaction increases. The reaction heat of most nitration reactions is −145 ± 70 kJ/mol, which is a strong exothermic reaction. If the reaction process has abnormal failures, such as improper operation, it will develop into thermal runaway of the reaction. When the reaction exothermic rate exceeds the cooling threshold of the reactor, it may cause loss of control and eventually lead to serious consequences such as leakage, fire, and explosion. Ray et al. [4] used dynamic scanning calorimetry (DSC) and accelerating rate calorimetry (ARC) to study the thermal decomposition behavior of 1,2,4-triazole-5-one (TO), nitration solution, and dicyandiamide (NTO) under adiabatic conditions. At the same time, the thermal hazard of NTO synthesis at different feed temperatures was evaluated through thermal variables such as adiabatic temperature increase (∆Tad) and maximum temperature of the synthesis reaction (MTSR), providing key parameters for the safety of NTO during reaction, transportation, and storage. Yao et al. [5,6] optimized the process of nitration of meta-xylene to prepare nitrometa xylene using response surface methodology, determined the optimal reaction conditions, and calculated the reaction enthalpy to be 240.9 kJ/mol with a ∆Tad of 98.1 °C.
Although some progress has been made in the safety risk assessment of chemical reactions, there are still some issues that need to be considered. At present, most studies on the thermal decomposition of substances focus on pure components, without considering the effects of solvents, by-products, etc., on their decomposition behavior during the reaction process. Research results cannot accurately reflect the stability of materials in the actual production process. In addition, research on the thermal hazards of hazardous processes mainly focuses on the reaction process, without analyzing auxiliary units such as quenching, extraction, and acid–base neutralization. Research results cannot fully and truly reflect the thermal hazards of fine chemical processes.
This article focuses on the entire process of nitration of benzotriazole ketone, which includes four steps: nitration, quenching, extraction, and alkaline washing. The decomposition risk, reaction risk, and secondary decomposition risk of the reaction products were analyzed by using DSC, reaction calorimetry (RC1), and ARC. The uncontrolled degree of the reaction and the acceptability of the hazards of the reaction process were evaluated. The research results provide a basis for the safety production control of fine chemical enterprises and the supervision of government functional departments.

2. Experimental Section

2.1. Experimental Principles

The complete nitration process of benzotriazole ketone consists of four sequential steps: nitration, quenching, extraction, and alkaline washing. A schematic diagram of the reaction pathway is presented in Figure 1.
The complete nitration route for benzotriazole ketone consists of four sequential unit operations—nitration, quenching, extraction, and alkaline washing—executed under rigorously controlled conditions:
(1)
Nitration step: The reactor jacket temperature was set to 33 °C. Benzotriazole ketone (186.0 g, 0.63 mol) and fuming sulfuric acid (640.0 g) were charged in a single portion and agitated with an anchor-type impeller at 110 rpm. After the mixture reached thermal equilibrium at 33 °C, concentrated nitric acid (42.0 g, 0.65 mol, 98 wt%) was added dropwise over 30 min while maintaining the bulk temperature at 33 °C. The reaction was then allowed to proceed isothermally until the exotherm ceased (≈6 h). At 33 °C, the post-reaction mixture was sampled to determine the specific heat capacity (Cp) and other thermophysical parameters.
(2)
Quenching step: With the reactor at ambient temperature, water (133.0 g) and toluene (140.0 g) were introduced, and the contents were cooled to 5 °C. The stirrer speed was adjusted to 150 rpm before 270.0 g of the nitration mixture was added over 4 h. During the addition process, the temperature rose from 5 °C to 60 °C. After completion, the system was held for 30 min to reach steady state, and Cp, along with other basic parameters of the quenched mixture, were measured.
(3)
Extraction step: The quenched liquor (360.0 g) was heated to 63 °C under stirring at 150 rpm. Toluene (140.0 g) was then added in a single charge, followed by a 30 min hold at 63 °C. Once thermal equilibrium was achieved, the mixture was analyzed for Cp and related properties.
(4)
Alkaline-washing step: The combined toluene phase (430.0 g) was heated to 63 °C while maintaining agitation at 150 rpm. A single charge of aqueous caustic soda (200.0 g) was introduced, and the biphasic system was held for 30 min. After reaching thermal stability, Cp and other key parameters of the washed organic phase were determined.
This stepwise protocol allowed for a comprehensive evaluation of thermal behavior and heat release characteristics at each stage, providing the data necessary for quantitative safety assessment and subsequent process optimization.

2.2. Reagents

Benzotriazole ketone (AR grade) was obtained from Wuhan Kemike Biomedical Technology Co., Ltd. (Wuhan, China). Oleum, fuming nitric acid, toluene, and sodium hydroxide (all AR grade) were supplied by Nanjing Wangqing Chemical Glassware and Instrument Co., Ltd. (Nanjing, China). All chemicals were used without further treatment.

2.3. Experimental Devices

2.3.1. Dynamic Scanning Calorimetry

DSC is a widely used technique for basic thermal analysis. The test was conducted at a heating rate of 10 °C/min under a nitrogen atmosphere at a flow rate of 50 mL/min. The samples were placed in a pressure-resistant, gold-plated crucible (25 μL capacity, 10 MPa max pressure). Prior to testing, calibration was performed using standard indium (In) and zinc (Zn) samples to ensure instrument accuracy [7,8,9]. The results were analyzed using the STARe software package V16.10 (Mettler Toledo, Greifensee, Switzerland) to determine the key thermal parameters.
The nitration reaction process of benzotriazole ketone is as follows: add benzotriazole ketone to fuming sulfuric acid, stir to dissolve, and add fuming nitric acid dropwise. The product was quenched with water in a maturation kettle, extracted with toluene, and the organic layer was washed with alkali to obtain 1-(2,4-dichloro-5-nitrobenzene)-4-difluoromethyl-4,5-dihydro-3- methyl-1,2,4-triazole-5(1H)-one. The tested materials mainly included (1) the benzotriazole ketone solution and (2) the nitration solution of benzotriazole ketone.

2.3.2. Reaction Calorimeter

The RC1 experiments were carried out using an RC1mx atmospheric pressure glass reactor (Mettler Toledo, Greifensee, Switzerland). The reactor was equipped with a glass thermometer probe, a 25 W calibration heater, and a glass anchor-type stirring blade [10,11,12]. Key measurement parameters included vessel temperature, jacket temperature, reaction heat release power, total sample mass, thermal accumulation, heat conversion rate, and specific heat release rate.

2.3.3. Accelerating Rate Calorimetry

ARC (THT, Milto, Caines, UK) was employed to investigate the thermal decomposition behavior of the reaction products. The instrument features a pressure range of 0–200 bar, a heating rate of 0–200 °C/min, and a temperature resolution of 0.01 °C. Approximately 10 mL of the sample was sealed in a Hastelloy alloy sphere for testing. Experiments were conducted using the heat–wait–search (HWS) mode, with a heating step of 5 °C, a waiting period of 15 min, a search interval of 10 min, and a temperature rise detection threshold of 0.02 °C/min [13,14,15].

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Stability of Material

The DSC results of benzotriazole ketone, the benzotriazole ketone solution, and the nitration solution of benzotriazole ketone involved in its nitration reaction are shown in Figure 2 and Table 1. As shown in Figure 2, the benzotriazole ketone sample was found to release heat in the test temperature range (25–350) °C, starting from 264.98 °C to the end of the test (400 °C), with an extrapolated starting exothermic temperature (Tonset) of 353.61 °C and a heat release rate of 421.42 kJ/kg. The sample melted at 118.79 °C. It can be seen that the solution of benzotriazole ketone released heat in two stages within the temperature range of 25.00~400.00 °C. The solution started to decompose at 144.76 °C until reaching 222.46 °C. The calculated onset decomposition temperature (Tonset) was 165.28 °C, and the reaction enthalpy (ΔH1) was 104.38 kJ/kg. The second stage heat release started at 288.24 °C and ended at 345.85 °C, with a ΔH2 of 202.48 kJ/kg. The above two stages of heat release were both attributed to the decomposition of fuming sulfuric acid. Moreover, a first-stage exothermic signal was detected in the nitration solution of benzotriazole ketone within the temperature range of 25.00~400.00 °C. The solution started to decompose from 295.99 °C until the end of the test, and the heat release was not complete. The calculated Tonset was 336.26 °C, and ΔH was 455.77 kJ/kg. This is mainly attributed to the decomposition of fuming sulfuric acid and 1-(2,4-dichloro-5-nitrobenzene)-4-difluoromethyl-4,5-dihydro-3-methyl-1,2,4-triazole-5 (1H)-one.

3.2. Characteristics of Reaction Heat

The exothermic curves of the nitration reaction, quenching process, extraction process, and alkaline-washing process of benzotriazole ketone are shown in Figure 3, Figure 4, Figure 5 and Figure 6, respectively. The color coding used in the heat release curves is summarized in Table 2. The data are summarized in Table 3. As shown in the exothermic curve in Figure 3, the system exhibited obvious heat release during the process of adding nitric acid and sulfur, and the nitration reaction occurred rapidly at this time. As shown in the exothermic curve in Figure 4, the benzotriazole ketone solution released heat rapidly when it was added to water. It can be seen that the apparent heat release during the quenching process was high, with a ∆Tad of 66.64 °C. As shown in Figure 5 and Figure 6, the heat release during the extraction and alkaline-washing processes was relatively small, with ∆Tads of 0.22 °C and 5.07 °C, respectively, indicating their high safety. As shown in the exothermic curve in Figure 5, the quenched product was further diluted and released a small amount of heat. As shown in the exothermic curve in Figure 6, when sodium hydroxide solution was added at room temperature, the system temperature decreased, and heat was first absorbed. After reaching the process temperature, a small amount of dilute sulfuric acid reacted with the sodium hydroxide solution and released heat.
As shown in Figure 3, using a semi-batch reactor, the ∆Tad of the nitration reaction of benzotriazole ketone was found to be 86.70 °C. In order to reduce the thermal hazard of the reaction process, an N-type series continuous kettle reactor was adopted in the production process. Using this device, the product could be removed through overflow or a liquid-level control system to ensure a constant volume of reaction materials, volumetric flow rate of feed, and residence time. The N-type series continuous kettle reactor equipment and the process parameters used were as follows:
(1)
Process parameters: volumetric flow rate (υ0) = 0.00016 m3/s, concentration of chlorobenzotriazole ketone at the feed inlet (t = 0) (c0) = 1298.8 mol/m3, feed inlet temperature (T) = 25 °C, conversion rate of material at the overflow (X) = 97%, and density of the mixed solution (ρ) = 1800 kg/m3;
(2)
Reactor parameters: volume (V) = 3.99 m3, heat exchange area (A) = 8.77 m2, maximum temperature difference with cooling system (ΔT) = 58 K, and comprehensive heat transfer coefficient (U) = 0.0465 kW/(m2·K).
The calculation of reaction heat for a series continuous stirred tank reactor is shown in Equation (1).
Q rx = υ 0 c 0 X Δ H r
The heat exchange calculation of the series continuous stirred tank reactor is shown in Equation (2).
Q ex = U A Δ T
At this point, the heat generation exceeds the heat exchange capacity and cannot be removed through the jacket. The temperature difference that must be compensated for through heating and cooling effects is shown in Equation (3).
Δ T 1 = Q rx Q ex υ 0 ρ C P
The calculated ∆Tad of this reaction process was 19.95 °C, which is 77% lower than the ∆Tad of 86.70 °C in the kettle reactor, indicating that it is safer to use a series continuous kettle reactor than a semi-batch kettle reactor.

3.3. The Secondary Decomposition Behavior of Matter

As shown in Figure 7a, three exothermic signals were detected within the temperature range of 30.00~350.00 °C. The first stage started at 111.00 °C and ended at 125.00 °C, with slow heat release. The temperature increased by 14.00 °C, with a heat release of 92.25 kJ/kg, and the initial temperature increase rate was 2.80 × 10−2 °C/min. The second stage started at 140.90 °C and lasted for a short period of time, ending at 141.90 °C, with a heat release of 6.59 kJ/kg. The instrument entered a search mode again, with the third stage starting from 160.80 °C and ending at 349.10 °C, releasing 1238.90 kJ/kg of heat. Comparing its temperature increase rate, it was found that at this stage, the temperature increase rate reached a maximum value of 0.74 °C/min, the maximum pressure increase rate was 1.19 bar/min, and the temperature corresponding to the maximum temperature increase rate was 240.90 °C. A nitro group, an energetic functional group, was added to benzotriazole ketone. ARC results show that its thermal stability was poor. Therefore, the temperature had to be strictly controlled during the highly exothermic nitration reaction to avoid thermal decomposition. Adiabatic kinetic calculations were conducted at this stage.
As shown in Figure 7b, a heat release signal was detected within the temperature range of 60.0~245.0 °C, starting from 161.63 °C and ending at 238.09 °C, with a heat release of 484.06 kJ/kg, an ∆Tad of 76.46 °C, a maximum pressure increase rate of 0.02 MPa/min, and a maximum temperature rate of 195.09 °C. As shown in Figure 7c, a heat release signal was detected within 60.0~300.0 °C, starting at 155.80 °C and ending at 201.90 °C, with a heat release of 311.03 kJ/kg, an ∆Tad of 46.10 °C, a maximum pressure increase rate of 0.10 bar/min, and a maximum temperature rate of 182.90 °C. During the thermal decomposition process of the mixture after the reaction, TD24 was 120.45 °C. As shown in Figure 7d, no obvious exothermic signal was detected within the temperature range of 60.0~315.0 °C for the sample, and the TD24 of the solution after the reaction was calculated to be 250.0 °C.
The relationship between the time to maximum rate under adiabatic conditions (TMRad) and the temperature for the secondary decomposition of nitration, quenching, and extraction products of benzotriazole ketone is shown in Figure 8. As shown in Figure 8a, during the thermal decomposition process of the reacted mixture, the temperature at which the time to maximum rate was 24 h under adiabatic conditions (TD24) was 86.20 °C and the temperature at which the time to maximum rate was 8 h under adiabatic conditions (TD8) was 98.40 °C. As shown in Figure 8b, the TD24 during the thermal decomposition process of the mixture after the reaction was 101.90 °C. As shown in Figure 8c, during the thermal decomposition process of the mixture after the reaction, TD24 was 85.10 °C and TD8 was 94.20 °C.

3.4. Process Hazard Assessment

A process hazard assessment was conducted based on Tp, MTT, MTSR, and TD24, with evaluation criteria shown in Table 4.
When using a semi-batch reactor, it can be seen from Table 3 that the nitration process of benzotriazole ketone yielded a TP of 33 °C, an MTSR of 119.7 °C, an MTT of 320 °C, and TD24 of 86.20 °C. The order of the four parameters was Tp < TD24 < MTSR < MTT, and the risk of the reaction process was level 5.

4. Conclusions

In this study, DSC, RC1, and ARC were employed to investigate the thermal behavior of the nitration of benzotriazole ketone with mixed acid. The results are as follows:
(1)
The decomposition heat release rates of the benzotriazole ketone solution and nitration solution were 306.86 kJ/kg and 455.77 kJ/kg, respectively.
(2)
The nitration reaction was a strongly exothermic reaction and underwent a semi-batch kettle reaction. The ∆Tad of benzotriazole ketone nitration was 86.70 °C. The series kettle continuous reaction was safer than the semi-batch kettle reaction.
(3)
The secondary decomposition reaction order of the digestion product of benzotriazole ketone under adiabatic conditions in the entire nitration process of benzotriazole ketone was 1.0, Ea was 111.66 kJ/mol, A was 1.1097 × 1010, and TD24 was 86.20 °C. Under adiabatic conditions, during quenching, TD24 was 101.90 °C, whereas during the extraction process, TD24 was 120.45 °C, and during alkaline washing, TD24 was greater than 250 °C.

Author Contributions

Methodology, Y.S. and G.G.; Validation, Y.S.; Formal analysis, Y.S. and Q.X.; Investigation, Y.S.; Data curation, Y.S.; Writing—original draft, Y.S. and Q.X.; Writing—review & editing, Y.S., H.H., T.Z. and G.G.; Funding acquisition, G.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study.

Conflicts of Interest

Author Qianjin Xiao was employed by the Jiangsu TaiJieZhiBang Testing Technology Co., Ltd. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Shao, R.; Pan, H.; Huang, J. Safety risk assessment of chemical production process based on local and global objectives. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 2022, 79, 104827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Xia, Q.; Ren, Y.; Wang, Z.; Yang, D.; Yan, P.; Wu, Z.; Sun, B.; Feng, Q.; Qian, C. Safety risk assessment method for thermal abuse of lithium-ion battery pack based on multiphysics simulation and improved bisection method. Energy 2023, 264, 126228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Chen, F.; Wei, D.; Ni, L.; Jiang, J.; Fu, G. A modified inherent thermal runaway hazard index (m-ITHI) for risk assessment of chemical processes based on cloud model. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2023, 169, 766–775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ray, A.; Nkwonta, C.; Forrestal, P.; Danaher, M.; Richards, K.; O’Callaghan, T.; Hogan, S.; Cummins, E. Current knowledge on urease and nitration inhibitors technology and their safety. Rev. Environ. Health 2021, 36, 477–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Yao, H.; Fu, G.; Ni, Y.; Ni, L.; Jiang, J.; Zhang, H.; Cheng, Z.; Chen, Z. Process optimization, thermal hazard evaluation and reaction mechanism of m-xylene nitration using HNO3-Ac2O as nitrating reagent. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2024, 182, 1008–1023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Yao, H.; Ni, L.; Liu, Y.; Fu, G.; Jiang, J.; Cheng, Z.; Ni, Y.; Chen, Z. Process hazard and thermal risk evaluation of m-xylene nitration with mixed acid. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2023, 175, 238–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Liu, Z. Review and prospect of thermal analysis technology applied to study thermal properties of energetic materials. FirePhysChem 2021, 1, 129–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lu, Y.M.; Liu, S.H.; Shu, C.M. Evaluation of thermal hazards based on thermokinetic parameters of 2-(1-cyano-1-methylethyl)azocarboxamide by ARC and DSC. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2019, 138, 2873–2881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ghanbari, E.; Picken, S.J.; van Esch, J.H. Analysis of differential scanning calorimetry (DSC): Determining the transition temperatures, and enthalpy and heat capacity changes in multicomponent systems by analytical model fitting. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2023, 148, 12393–12409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Parker, T.F.; Quan, Y.; Wilhite, B.A.; Wang, Q. Process scale-up hazard analysis and product yield investigation of cyclohexanol oxidation to cyclohexanone using RC1 calorimetry. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2022, 61, 17218–17225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Parker, T.; Mao, Y.; Wang, Q. Application of response surface methodology for hazard analysis of 2-butanol oxidation to 2-butanone using RC1 calorimetry. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 2022, 75, 104703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Tramšek, M.; Goršek, A. Analysis of growth models for batch kefir grain biomass production in RC1 reaction system. J. Food Process Eng. 2008, 31, 754–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wu, S.-H.; Shyu, M.-L.; Yet-Pole, I.; Chi, J.-H.; Shu, C.-M. Evaluation of runaway reaction for dicumyl peroxide in a batch reactor by DSC and VSP2. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 2009, 22, 721–727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zhao, S.; Pu, W.; Pan, J.; Chen, S.; Zhang, L. Thermo-oxidative characteristics and kinetics of light, heavy, and extra-heavy crude oils using accelerating rate calorimetry. Fuel 2022, 312, 123001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zhao, X.Q.; Wu, W.Q.; Li, H.; Guo, Z.-C.; Chen, W.-H.; Chen, L. Thermal hazards of benzaldehyde oxime: Based on decomposition products and kinetics analysis by adiabatic calorimeter. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2021, 153, 527–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. GB/T 42300-2022; Standardization Administration of China. Specification for Safety Risk Assessment of Fine Chemical Reactions. Standards Press of China: Beijing, China, 2022. (In Chinese)
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the complete process of nitration reaction of benzotriazole ketone.
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the complete process of nitration reaction of benzotriazole ketone.
Processes 13 02201 g001
Figure 2. DSC test curve of benzotriazole ketone, benzotriazole ketone solution, and nitration solution of benzotriazole ketone.
Figure 2. DSC test curve of benzotriazole ketone, benzotriazole ketone solution, and nitration solution of benzotriazole ketone.
Processes 13 02201 g002
Figure 3. The heat release curve of benzotriazole ketone’s nitration reaction.
Figure 3. The heat release curve of benzotriazole ketone’s nitration reaction.
Processes 13 02201 g003
Figure 4. The heat release curve of the quenching reaction.
Figure 4. The heat release curve of the quenching reaction.
Processes 13 02201 g004
Figure 5. The heat release curve of the extraction process.
Figure 5. The heat release curve of the extraction process.
Processes 13 02201 g005
Figure 6. The heat release curve of the alkaline-washing process.
Figure 6. The heat release curve of the alkaline-washing process.
Processes 13 02201 g006
Figure 7. Time–temperature–pressure variation curves of the secondary decomposition of benzotriazole ketone’s (a) nitration, (b) quenching, (c) extraction, and (d) alkaline-washing products.
Figure 7. Time–temperature–pressure variation curves of the secondary decomposition of benzotriazole ketone’s (a) nitration, (b) quenching, (c) extraction, and (d) alkaline-washing products.
Processes 13 02201 g007
Figure 8. TMRad curves of the secondary decomposition of (a) nitration, (b) quenching, and (c) extraction products.
Figure 8. TMRad curves of the secondary decomposition of (a) nitration, (b) quenching, and (c) extraction products.
Processes 13 02201 g008
Table 1. Summary of DSC testing and extrapolation.
Table 1. Summary of DSC testing and extrapolation.
MaterialsMass/mgStarting Temperature of Heat Release/°CPeak Temperature/°C
Benzotriazole ketone solution3.80I: 144.76
II: 263.96
I: 191.36
II: 319.40
Nitration solution of benzotriazole ketone3.25295.99372.81
MaterialsEnding temperature of heat release/°CInitial decomposition temperature/°CHeat release/
(kJ·kg−1)
Benzotriazole ketone solutionI: 222.46
II: 345.65
I: 165.28
II: 294.41
306.86
Nitration solution of benzotriazole ketone-336.26455.77
Note: “-” indicates that the heat release was ongoing, and the substance was still releasing heat at the ending temperature of the test; “I and II” indicate that the sample underwent multiple stages of heat release with increasing temperature during the testing process. I and II are the ordinal numbers of the samples arranged with increasing temperature.
Table 2. Color explanation of the heat release curves in the whole reaction process.
Table 2. Color explanation of the heat release curves in the whole reaction process.
Trends ColorsUnits
Temperature inside the reaction vessel (Tr)Processes 13 02201 i001°C
Reactor jacket temperature (Tj)Processes 13 02201 i002°C
Reaction heat release power (qr_hf)Processes 13 02201 i003W
Total mass of materials inside the reaction vessel (Mr)Processes 13 02201 i004g
Thermal accumulationProcesses 13 02201 i005%
Thermal conversionProcesses 13 02201 i006%
Specific heat release rate (qr_hf-qb/Mr)Processes 13 02201 i007W/g
Specific heat capacity of the reaction mixture (cpr)Processes 13 02201 i008J/g*k
Table 3. The tests and analyzed data of RC1.
Table 3. The tests and analyzed data of RC1.
ReactionsApparent Heat Release/kJSpecific Heat Release/
(kJ·kg−1)
Specific Heat Capacity After Reaction/(kJ·kg−1·K−1)
The whole process of nitration of benzotriazole ketonenitration process97.08111.841.29
quenching reaction70.89131.281.97
extraction process0.280.562.59
alkaline-washing process8.2713.132.59
ReactionsΔTad/KTP/°CMTSR/°CMTT/°C
The whole process of nitration of benzotriazole ketonenitration process86.70/11.95#33.00119.7/44.95#320.00
quenching reaction66.6463.0066.06100.00
extraction process0.2263.0063.22100.00
alkali washing process5.0763.0068.07100.00
#: Data corresponding to n-type series continuous kettle reactor. Tp refers to temperature for the process. MTT refers to the maximum temperature for technical reasons.
Table 4. Risk assessment criteria for reaction processes [16].
Table 4. Risk assessment criteria for reaction processes [16].
LevelTemperatureConsequences and Explanation
1Tp ≤ MTSR < MTT < TD24Low risk. When MTSR is less than MTT and TD24, there will be no secondary decomposition of reaction products or material flushing. However, the reactants should avoid prolonged heating to prevent them from reaching MTT.
2Tp ≤ MTSR < TD24 < MTTThere is a potential for decomposition of the reactants. MTT is higher than TD24. Once the reaction is out of control for a long time, it may cause secondary decomposition of the reaction products. Continuing to release heat will reach MTT and cause material flushing, etc.
3Tp ≤ MTT ≤ MTSR < TD24Possible material flushing may occur. MTSR is greater than MTT, which can easily cause material flushing and even sudden pressure increase. At this time, MTSR is less than TD24, and the possibility of secondary decomposition of reaction products is not high. The exothermic rate during the MTT reaction affects safety. It is recommended to increase emergency pressure relief and emergency cooling to avoid material flushing.
4Tp ≤ MTT < TD24 < MTSRThere is a high possibility of secondary decomposition of materials and reaction products, which may lead to explosions. The temperature may exceed MTT, causing material flushing and secondary decomposition of reaction products, which seriously affects process safety in terms of heat release rate. Emergency pressure relief and emergency cooling have a certain protective effect, but cannot avoid secondary decomposition.
5Tp < TD24 < MTSR < MTT
Tp < TD24 < MTT < MTSR
There is a high possibility of explosion. MTSR greater than TD24 is prone to secondary decomposition of reaction products, which can continue to release heat and exceed MTT temperature, increasing the risk. Relying solely on emergency cooling, emergency pressure relief, etc., cannot meet safety requirements. Therefore, the process should be optimized, area isolation should be increased, and the entire process should be automated.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sheng, Y.; Xiao, Q.; Hu, H.; Zhang, T.; Guan, G. Process Safety Assessment of the Entire Nitration Process of Benzotriazole Ketone. Processes 2025, 13, 2201. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13072201

AMA Style

Sheng Y, Xiao Q, Hu H, Zhang T, Guan G. Process Safety Assessment of the Entire Nitration Process of Benzotriazole Ketone. Processes. 2025; 13(7):2201. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13072201

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sheng, Yingxia, Qianjin Xiao, Hui Hu, Tianya Zhang, and Guofeng Guan. 2025. "Process Safety Assessment of the Entire Nitration Process of Benzotriazole Ketone" Processes 13, no. 7: 2201. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13072201

APA Style

Sheng, Y., Xiao, Q., Hu, H., Zhang, T., & Guan, G. (2025). Process Safety Assessment of the Entire Nitration Process of Benzotriazole Ketone. Processes, 13(7), 2201. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13072201

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop