Next Article in Journal
Use of Reconstructed Pore Networks for Determination of Effective Transport Parameters of Commercial Ti-Felt PTLs
Previous Article in Journal
A Significant Need in the Medical Field: A New Method for Putrescine, Spermine and Spermidine Using High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC)
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Modeling and Optimization of p-Benzoquinone Degradation via Flow-By Electro-Oxidation on Boron-Doped Diamond Electrodes

by
Ever Peralta-Reyes
1,
Alejandro Regalado-Méndez
1,*,
Frida A. Robles
1,
Carlos Méndez-Durazno
2 and
Patricio J. Espinoza-Montero
2,*
1
Research Laboratories, Universidad del Mar, Campus Puerto Ángel, Puerto Ángel, Oaxaca 70902, Mexico
2
Escuela de Ciencias Químicas, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador, Quito 170525, Ecuador
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Processes 2025, 13(4), 942; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13040942
Submission received: 25 February 2025 / Revised: 15 March 2025 / Accepted: 18 March 2025 / Published: 22 March 2025

Abstract

:
The electro-oxidation of p-Benzoquinone (p-BQ) was investigated in a flow-by reactor (FM01-LC) without separation, with two boron-doped diamond (BDD) electrodes as both the anode and cathode, in batch recirculation mode. The optimal operating conditions were determined using response surface methodology, specifically a face-centered central composite design. The initial pH (pH₀) and applied current density (j) were evaluated as factors, while the p-BQ (η (%)) served as the response variable. The optimal conditions, a pH0 of 6.52 and a j of 0.124 A/cm2, achieved a maximum removal efficiency of 97.32% after 5 h of electrolysis. The specific energy consumption and total operating cost were 127.854 kWh/m3 and USD 3.7 USD/L, respectively.

1. Introduction

With the growing global population and rapid industrial advancement, hazardous substances in water, such as recalcitrant contaminants, pose a considerable threat to human health and aquatic ecosystems. These contaminants, also known as “contaminants of emerging concern” (CECs), are characterized by high toxicity and long-term environmental persistence, representing a significant risk to ecological safety and human health, even at very low concentrations. Typically, CECs exhibit hydrophobicity and low molecular weight, which promote their bioaccumulation and delay their elimination. Although all animals possess xenobiotic elimination mechanisms, such as metabolic enzymes, transporter proteins, and conjugation systems, these systems can be ineffective in preventing CEC bioaccumulation [1]. Among the various CECs, p-Benzoquinone (p-BQ) is a well-known occupational and environmental pollutant. It is extensively used in the pharmaceutical, leather, and polymer industries, as well as in the production of hydroquinone, insecticides, fungicides, and tannin agents and as a precursor to various dyes. However, p-BQ exposure has been linked to adverse health conditions, such as eye and respiratory tract irritation, erythema, localized tissue necrosis, and induced mutagenic effects [2,3,4,5].
Considering these challenges, chemical water treatment using electro-oxidation methods in advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) has shown promise in effectively mineralizing various CECs [6,7,8]. Specifically, AOPs produce reactive oxygen species (ROS), such as 1O2, SO4•−, and OH, through metal-catalyzed decomposition oxidants like O3, persulfate, and H2O2 [9,10]. Research has shown that during catalytic decomposition, ROS facilitate the oxidative degradation of CECs in water due to their relatively high redox potentials (e.g., SO4•−, 2.5–3.1 V vs. NHE; OH, 1.9–2.7 V vs. NHE) [11,12,13]. Moreover, AOPs can convert CECs into CO2 and H2O or achieve complete mineralization [14].
The degradation of p-BQ has been extensively studied using various AOPs in both batch and flow cells. For example, Ozge et al. [15] performed the electro-Fenton process in a batch reactor with a treated volume of 350 mL and an initial p-BQ concentration of 50 mg/mL, resulting in the complete removal of p-BQ within 30 min. Ajeel et al., 2015 [4], investigated the electrochemical oxidation of p-BQ in a batch reactor equipped with a carbon black diamond (CBD) composite anode, attaining 96% removal of p-BQ under the following conditions: initial p-BQ concentration of 200 mg/mL, initial pH of 6, current density of 45 mA/cm2, 120 min of treatment, treatment volume of 100 mL, and a CBD composition of 20. Furthermore, Yu et al. [16] conducted anodic oxidation of a 500 mL aqueous p-BQ solution (100 mg/L) in a batch reactor, resulting in 96.1% p-BQ removal and 68.2% COD removal within 3 h. The process operated at an initial pH of 6.5, a current density of 10 mA/cm2, room temperature, and with 0.1 mol/L NaCl as the supporting electrolyte, using stainless steel and Ti/ Pb-TiOxNWs/PbO2 as the cathode and anode, respectively. Despite the high removal efficiency, possible dissolution of Pb ions from the PbO2 electrode was observed after 3 h of treatment, raising concerns about pollution issues.
Given the mass transfer limitations of batch cells, flow cells have emerged as an efficient reactor configuration, offering high mass transference coefficients and easy temperature control. Regarding the degradation of p-BQ in flow cells, only two studies have been reported. In the first study, Yoon et al. [17] utilized a flow-through cell equipped with a carbon fiber anode to perform the electrochemical degradation of p-BQ, achieving a removal efficiency of 99.23%. This result was obtained under the following conditions: an initial p-BQ concentration of 0.01 M, a volumetric flow rate of 0.0016 L/min, a current of 175 mA, and an initial pH of 7, with a total treatment time of 12 h, for a 25 mL solution. In the second study, Panizza et al. [3] examined the anodic degradation of p-BQ using a single-compartment flow cell with a boron-doped diamond (BDD) anode under galvanostatic conditions. The study authors observed 98% degradation efficiency under optimal operating conditions, with a volumetric flow rate of 5 L/min, a temperature of 45 °C, and a current of 1 over 150 min of electrolysis time. This research highlights the potential of BDD anodes under mass-transfer control, particularly at high p-BQ concentrations with low current and high volumetric flow rates.
Notably, BDD anodes have been proven to be exceptional materials for AOP applications [18,19,20]. They possess outstanding electrochemical properties, including a wide potential window, corrosion resistance, low background current, and high durability. These properties enable these BDD anodes to generate physiosorbed OH radicals, facilitating the rapid and efficient mineralization of CECs [21]. Additionally, boron concentration considerably influences the electrochemical performance of BDD anodes, suggesting that controlling boron concentration could lead to the design of BDD anode materials with improved electrochemical properties [22,23,24]. Moreover, OH radicals are weakly adsorbed on the BDD anode surface, allowing them to immediately and non-selectively attack and oxidize CECs, through reactions (1) and (2) [25,26,27].
D D B + H 2 O D D B O H + H + + e
D D B O H + R D D B + m H 2 O + n C O 2
To enhance the mineralization of CECs, researchers have explored BBD anodic degradation using various cathode materials, such as platinum coated with titanium (Pt/Ti) [28], stainless steel [3,28], copper (Cu) [29], and zirconium (Zr) [30]. However, to the best of our knowledge, there have been no studies assessing the optimization of p-BQ mineralization using BDD electrodes as both the cathode and anode. Therefore, this study focused on the maximization of the electrochemical oxidation of p-BQ in an aqueous solution using an electrochemical flow reactor equipped with BDD electrodes as both the anode and cathode. Additionally, we calculated the operating cost of the electrochemical process as a function of electrolysis time and energy consumption. Response surface methodology with central composite design (RSM-CCD) was used to design the experiments and optimize the process parameters, including initial pH (pH₀) and current density (j). The results of this study provide a foundation for scaling up the process and reproducing the results in larger systems [3].

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Reagents

A 2.5 L freshly prepared aqueous solution of p-BQ (CAS: 106-51-4, molar mass: 108.09 g/mol, purity ≥98%) was used for each experiment at an initial concentration ([C]0) of 1 × 10−3 M in 0.15 M Na2SO4. To adjust the pH according to the experimental design, we prepared 2 M solutions of NaOH (97% purity) and H2SO4 (95% purity) before each experiment. All reagents were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Toluca, Mexico) and employed without any previous treatment.

2.2. Equipment

A Hanna HI2210 pH meter was used to measure the pH of the solutions, and electrode energization was performed with a GW Instek GPR-351OHD power supply. The degradation efficiency of p-BQ (η) was determined using a Perkin Elmer Lambda 365 UV-Vis spectrophotometer [31]. The electrochemical flow reactor consisted of BBD electrodes serving as both the anode and cathode supported on niobium (Nb) and was purchased from Metakem™. Each electrode measured 20 cm in length and 1.6 cm in height, 32 cm2 in area, and had a thickness of 5 µm. The BDD electrodes feature an sp³-hybridized orbital structure like that of a diamond, which weakens the adsorption of intermediates and offers high corrosion resistance during long-term cycling from hydrogen to oxygen evolution, even in strongly acidic environments. More details of the electrochemical flow reactor can be found in our previous study [31].

2.3. Analytical Procedures

The efficiency of p-BQ degradation was calculated using Equation (3) [32]. The absorbance (A) of the p-BQ solution samples was measured at a wavelength (λ) of 246 nm at both the start and the end of each experiment.
η % = A 0 A t A 0 × 100
where A0 represents initial absorbance, while At denotes the final absorbance
Additionally, the η of p-BQ under optimal operating conditions was calculated using Equation (4),
η % = C 0 C t C 0 × 100
where C0 represents the absorbance at the start of the experiment and Ct denotes the absorbance at the end.

2.4. Operating Cost

The operating cost (OC) was calculated using Equations (5) to (9), considering the energy price and the cost of the supporting electrolyte. The total energy consumption (EC) includes the energy used by the electrodes, the flow pump, and the heat exchanger pump [33].
E electrode = U × i × t
E pump-flow = P n × t
E pump-heat   exchanger = P m × t
E C = E electrode + E pump-flow + E pump-heat-exchanger
O C = ξ E C + ϕ m electrolyte
where EC is the total energy consumption (kWh), U is the mean electric potential (V), i is the current intensity (A), t is the electrolysis time (h), Eelectrode is the energy consumption by the electrode (kWh), Epump-flow is the energy consumption by the flow pump in kWh, Epump-exchanger is the energy consumption by the heat exchanger pump (kWh), Pn and Pm are the pump power for the flow pump and the heat exchanger pump (0.198 and 0.123 kW, respectively), OC is the total operating cost (USD), ξ is the electricity price (0.21USD kW/h) for Tariff1B in Mexico, provided by the CFE, ϕ is the electrolyte price (168.57) in USD/kg, and melectrolyte is the mass of electrolyte consumed (kg).
The specific energy consumption (SEC) at a constant current intensity (i) was calculated using Equation (10) [34]:
S E C k W h m 3 = U × i × t V t
where Vt is the volume treated (2.5 L).

2.5. Experimental Design

The electrooxidation process was carried out based on a face-centered central composite design with two key operating parameters, initial pH (pH0) and current density (j). These variables were selected because they significantly influence the electrooxidation process [35]. The values and levels of the operating parameters are presented in Table 1. Additionally, the operating variables were coded using Equation (11).
X i = x i x 0 Δ x i
where Xi represents the coded value of each operating variable, xi denotes the actual value of each operating variable, x0 refers to the actual value of each operating variable at the center point, and Δxi indicates the increment between levels of each operating variable. The low and high levels were represented by −1, and +1, respectively.
The experimental design matrix included 10 runs, consisting of 2k factorial points, 2k axial points, and k central points, where k = 2 and α = 2k/4. The response variable was η (p-BQ removal efficiency). Additionally, three extra experiments were conducted to validate the optimal operating conditions and determine the kinetic parameters for the electrochemical degradation of p-BQ.

2.6. Modeling and Optimization Process

The modeling and optimization of the electro-oxidation process were conducted using response surface methodology (RSM), as outlined in Section 2.5. This approach was applied to evaluate the effect of the independent variables, initial pH (pH0) and applied current density (j), and the effect of the interactions between these variables on the response (η). RSM was also used to identify the optimal operating conditions for the process.
After the experimental design matrix was completed, a second-order polynomial regression model (as described in Equation (12)) was fitted to the data.
η = β 0 + i = 1 2 β i X i + i = 1 2 β i i X i 2 + i = 1 2 j = 1 2 β i j X i X j + ε
where βi is the polynomial constants, Xi is the coded variables, and ε is the error.
The accuracy and significance of the adjusted polynomial regression model were assessed with an analysis of variance (ANOVA) test [36]. Additionally, all data analyses, modeling, ANOVA and parity, contour, and 3D surface plots were performed using the Design Expert Software package (V.10.0) [35]. The optimal operating conditions were determined by applying the steepest descent method to Equation (12).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Polynomial Model

Based on the experimental matrix presented in Table 2, the p-BQ removal efficiency ranged from a capacity of 60.10 to 98.78%. The reduced second-order polynomial regression model representing p-BQ removal (η) is denoted by Equation (13). In the second-order polynomial regression model (Equation (14)), X1 and X2 are linear terms, X1X2 is the interaction term, and X 1 2 is the quadratic term.
Uncoded mathematical model
η % = 172.9379 4.1051 p H 1489.5744 j + 289.4370 p H × j 2.2459 p H 2
Coded mathematical model
η % = 91.6300 + 10.1700 X 1 0.6634 X 2 + 9.0600 X 1 X 2 8.9800 X 1 2

3.2. Interaction Effect Between Variables

In the coded regression model in Equation (13), the sign of each coefficient indicates the nature of the variable’s effect on p-BQ removal. A positive sign indicates a synergetic effect, while a negative sign indicates an antagonistic effect [37]. In Equation (13), X1 (pH0) and X1X2 (pH0 × j) exhibit a synergetic effect, while X2 shows an antagonistic effect.

3.3. ANOVA Test

The results of the ANOVA test for p-BQ removal are shown in Table 3. The analysis indicated that the second-order polynomial regression model was significant, evidenced by the F-value (24.11) being higher than the p-value (0.0018), confirming that the fitted model accurately represented the experimental data [38]. Additionally, a p-value lower than 0.05 indicated a significant term. For the individual model terms, X1, X1X2, and X12 (p = 0.0009, 0.0068, and 0.0035, respectively) were significant, while X2 was not (p = 0.6657).
The lack-of-fit test yielded a p-value of 0.2839, suggesting good model fit, as a p-value less than 0.1 indicates that the lack-of-fit is not significant [39,40]. Additionally, the model’s R2 value of 0.950 indicated an excellent fit to the experimental data [41]. The difference between R A d j 2 and R Pr e d 2 (0.098) was lower than 0.2, indicating a high level of concordance.
The adequate precision value of 14.516 suggests that the model had a sufficient signal-to-noise ratio, as values greater than 4 indicate that the model can effectively navigate the design space [42]. Furthermore, the coefficient of variance of 4.85% was lower than 10%, indicating the model’s high reproducibility and suitability for assessing the optimal operating variables.
As seen in Figure 1a, the predicted and actual p-BQ removal values are highly correlated, demonstrating the model’s adequacy in predicting p-BQ removal based on Equation (13). Figure 1b illustrates the perturbation plot, showing that the initial pH (pH0) significantly influenced p-BQ removal more than the applied current density (j), as it exhibits a distinct curvature and notable changes in slope.
Pareto analysis was conducted to evaluate the importance of each term in the fitted model Equation (13) using Equation (15),
P i = β i 2 i = 1 4 β i 2
As shown in Figure 1c, the terms β1, β12, and β11 significantly impacted p-BQ removal, contributing 38.79%, 30.78%, and 30.24%, respectively. In contrast, β2 had a minimal effect, contributing only 0.16%. These results, consistent with those observed in the perturbation diagram, highlight the important role of initial pH in hydroxyl radical production on the BDD anode surface. This effect depends on both the supporting electrolyte used and the organic compound under study [43].

3.4. Optimization of p-BQ Removal (η)

After establishing the experimental design matrix provided (Table 2) and the fitted regression model (Equation (13)), the optimal conditions for p-BQ removal could be determined. To identify the variable values that maximize η (%), the optimization criteria (Table 4) were input into the Design Expert® v10 software package [35], ensuring that all variables and the response (η [%]) were assigned equal importance (+++). The steepest ascent method was used to find the optimal process variables.
Figure 2 shows the optimization ramps for the initial pH (pH0) and applied current density (j). The results indicate that the optimal operating conditions for maximizing p-BQ removal (99.96%) were a pH0 of 6.52 and a j of 0.124 A/cm2.
The 3D surface plot (Figure 3a) illustrates the interaction effect between pH0 and j within the studied range. The plot forms a hyperbolic function, as indicated by the hyperbolic contour lines. Figure 3a also reveals that the applied current density has relatively minimal influence on p-BQ removal, whereas the initial pH exerts a more significant effect, with a notable shift in slope as pHo increases from low to high values (1–10). Specifically, as the initial pHo rises from 1 to 6, p-BQ removal improves, but from 6.7 to 10, it decreases. However, when the initial pH rises from 6.7 to 10, the removal of p-BQ declines. This decline is likely attributed to the accumulation of by-products in the aqueous solution at higher pH levels. Consequently, p-BQ mineralization (CO2 formation in aqueous solution) is more effective at lower initial pH values [4]. Furthermore, the supporting electrolyte used (Na2SO4) promotes the formation of other oxidative species (e.g., S 2 O 8 2 (Reaction (16)) and S O 4 (Reaction (17)), which have lower oxidation potentials than hydroxyl radicals (OH). Moreover, Reaction (17) indicates that S O 4 2 can act as a scavenger for OH, reducing the p-BQ removal rate [44].
2 S O 4 2 S 2 O 8 2 + 2 e
2 S O 4 2 + O H S 4 O + O H
Figure 3b depicts the overlay plot, which is bounded by a pH0 range of 1–10 and a j range of 0.08–0.13 A/cm2. The black lines denote the optimization criteria, the yellow area represents the feasible region, and the gray area indicates conditions that do not meet operational requirements. According to the overlay plot, the maximum p-BQ removal achieved was 99.96% under the optimal conditions of a pH0 of 6.52 and j of 0.124 A/cm2, with a treatment duration of 5 h.

3.5. Model Validation

Three additional experiments were performed to validate the fitted regression model (Equation (17)) under optimal operating conditions. The mean p-BQ removal was 97.32%. Comparing the predicted (99.96%) and experimental (97.32%) values revealed a discrepancy of 2.64%, indicating that the model accurately represented the electrochemical degradation process. Figure 4a displays the UV-Vis spectra, showing the progression of p-BQ degradation under optimal conditions, while Figure 4b shows p-BQ removal efficiency over time.
The pH during electrolysis (initial pH of 6.52, current density of 0.124 A/cm², and treatment period of 5 h) is shown in Figure 5. The solution pH remained relatively stable throughout the experiment, consistent with prior studies [45,46]. The slight increase in pH is attributed to the formation of carboxylic acids such as fumaric, succinic, oxalic, oxamic, maleic, formic, and acetic acids, aligning with previous findings [47]. It is important to note that no pH control mechanism was implemented in the experimental setup. This absence of pH adjustment is advantageous for industrial-scale treatments, as it eliminates the associated need for pH adjustment. Additionally, the final pH of the treated solution remained close to neutral, suggesting that the effluent could be discharged directly to sewage systems or other water bodies without further treatment.
The total operating cost was estimated at USD 3.07/L (1 USD = MXN 20.22), which includes both energy expenses and the cost of the supporting electrolyte consumed. The energy cost alone was USD 0.02/L. In industrial applications, the SEC is crucial because of its direct impact on operational costs. As shown in Figure 6, the SEC exhibits a linear trend from 0% to 70% p-BQ removal efficiency; however, after reaching 70% p-BQ removal, the SEC increases exponentially. This observation trend aligns with findings reported in the literature [3,44] and can be attributed to the formation of by-products that are more resistant to degradation, such as carboxylic acids (e.g., fumaric, succinic, oxalic, oxamic, maleic, formic, and acetic acids) [44]. Additionally, the exponential rise in SEC is influenced by the decreasing concentration of p-BQ in the aqueous solution as the reaction progresses [3]. At the end of the electrolysis process, the SEC reached 127.854 kWh/m3. Notably, the electrochemical treatment proposed in this study is environmentally friendly, as it generates no sludge, and maintains relatively low energy consumption, making the method compatible with renewable energy sources such as solar panels.

3.6. Kinetic Model

Figure 7 shows the p-BQ concentration decay for three kinetic reaction models, all of which exhibit asymptotic behavior (see Equation (18)). This pattern suggests that the electrochemical degradation of p-BQ functions under mass transfer control [43]. The apparent kinetic constants and corresponding determination coefficients (R2) for the three models are summarized in Table 5. Based on the R2, values, the electrochemical degradation of p-BQ followed a pseudo-first-order kinetic model, consistent with previous reports [3].
r p B Q = k a p p C p B Q n
Based on the regression analysis, the apparent kinetic constant (kapp) was 0.966 1/h with an R2 of 0.9737, indicating a strong correlation with the experimental data. The pseudo-first-order kinetic observed in this study align with the typical degradation of aromatic organic compounds through AOPs such as electrolysis; similar kinetics have been found for the degradation of beta-blockers [48,49,50], chloroquine [51], ibuprofen [36], and 2-chlorophenol [31]. This pattern is due to the constant generation of hydroxyl radicals (OH) on the BDD anode surface. Moreover, these OH cannot accumulate on the anode or in the bulk solution because of their short lifetimes [46].
Table 6 compares different methods for p-BQ degradation in electrochemical flow reactors. Notably, this study is the first to optimize the electrochemical degradation process of p-BQ while estimating the overall operating cost. Although previous studies have achieved higher degradation efficiency (99.23% and 100%, respectively) than that of the current study (97.32%), they used reactor volumes that were considerably smaller (0.0025 and 0.4 L) than those used in this work (2.5 L) [3,17]. Additionally, Yoon, J. et al. [17] achieved 99.3% p-BQ removal but required a reaction time of 12 h, longer than the 5 h method in this study. These results suggest that the electrochemical treatment proposed herein offers an effective method for treating wastewater containing recalcitrant compounds like p-BQ.

4. Conclusions

This study reports on the optimization of the electrochemical degradation of p-BQ using BDD electrodes in a batch recirculation model. The effects of pH and current density on p-BQ degradation were assessed using RSM by employing a CCD. According to the ANOVA results, an effective degradation efficiency of 97.32% was attained at a pH of 6.52 and a current density of 0.14 A/cm2 over a 5 h period. The experimental results are in line with the predictions of the reduced second-order fitted model, demonstrating the model’s strong predictive capacity for p-BQ removal efficiency. In our kinetic analysis, we found that p-BQ degradation followed pseudo-first-order kinetics, with an R2 value of 0.9737. Lastly, the total operating cost of the electrochemical treatment was USD 3.07 per liter, which includes both energy consumption and the cost of the supporting electrolyte. Our findings highlight the potential of the electrochemical treatment used in this study as an effective and scalable method for removing p-BQ from wastewater.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.R.-M., P.J.E.-M., and E.P.-R.; methodology, E.P.-R., F.A.R., P.J.E.-M., and A.R.-M.; software, A.R.-M.; validation, E.P.-R., A.R.-M., P.J.E.-M., and F.A.R.; formal analysis, A.R-M., F.A.R., and E.P.-R.; investigation, F.A.R., and E.P.-R.; resources, E.P.-R.; data curation, A.R.-M., C.M.-D., and P.J.E.-M.; writing—original draft preparation, A.R.-M. and E.P.-R.; writing—review and editing, A.R.-M., C.M.-D., E.P.-R., F.A.R., and P.J.E.-M.; visualization, P.J.E.-M., C.M.-D., and A.R.-M.; supervision, E.P.-R.; project administration, E.P.-R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors thank the Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador for financial support through the project: “Preparation of boron-doped diamond (BDD) photoelectrodes modified with bismuth semiconductors and their application in photoelectrocatalysis” PEP element: QIPR0027-IBYA103281090.

Data Availability Statement

All data are available in the paper. For further inquiries, please get in touch with the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors (A.R.-M. and E.P.-R.) are grateful to the Mexican Council of Science and Technology (CONAHCyT) for the stimulus through the Investigators National System program (SNII). Also, the authors would like to thank the staff of the investigation laboratories for dedicating their time and effort to facilitate the materials used to conduct this research.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Nicklisch, S.C.T.; Rees, S.D.; McGrath, A.P.; Gökirmak, T.; Bonito, L.T.; Vermeer, L.M.; Cregger, C.; Loewen, G.; Sandin, S.; Chang, G.; et al. Global Marine Pollutants Inhibit P-Glycoprotein: Environmental Levels, Inhibitory Effects, and Cocrystal Structure. Sci. Adv. 2016, 2, e1600001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Xie, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Guliaev, A.B.; Shen, H.; Hang, B.; Singer, B.; Wang, Z. The P-Benzoquinone DNA Adducts Derived from Benzene Are Highly Mutagenic. DNA Repair 2005, 4, 1399–1409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Panizza, M. Anodic Oxidation of Benzoquinone Using Diamond Anode. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2014, 21, 8451–8456. [Google Scholar]
  4. Ajeel, M.A.; Aroua, M.K.; Daud, W.M.A.W. P-Benzoquinone Anodic Degradation by Carbon Black Diamond Composite Electrodes. Electrochim. Acta 2015, 169, 46–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kiss, V.; Kecskeméti, Á.; Hülvely, B.M.; Tarczali Sarudi, P.; Csépes-Ruzicska, L.J.; Mercs, F.; Tóth, Á.; Fábián, I.; Ősz, K. Reductive Dehalogenation and Formation of Sulfonated Quinones in the Aqueous Reactions between Various Chloro-1,4-Benzoquinones and Sulfur(IV). J. Sulfur Chem. 2023, 44, 646–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Yu, Z.; Jin, X.; Guo, Y.; Liu, Q.; Xiang, W.; Zhou, S.; Wang, J.; Yang, D.; Wu, H.B.; Wang, J. Decoupled Oxidation Process Enabled by Atomically Dispersed Copper Electrodes for In-Situ Chemical Water Treatment. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 1186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Martínez-Huitle, C.A.; Ferro, S. Electrochemical Oxidation of Organic Pollutants for the Wastewater Treatment: Direct and Indirect Processes. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2006, 35, 1324–1340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Comninellis, C. Electrocatalysis in the Electrochemical Conversion/Combustion of Organic Pollutants for Waste Water Treatment. Electrochim. Acta 1994, 39, 1857–1862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Iqbal, A.; Bokhari, T.H.; Usman, M.; Yusaf, A.; Mansha, A.; Saeed, M.; Khan, S.; Iqbal, M.; Bhatti, M.A.; Shafqat, S.S.; et al. Methodological Optimization for Efficient Degradation of Acid Violet 49 Using Advanced Oxidation Processes and Varied Photocatalyst Combinations. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 30339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Yu, F.; Jia, C.; Wu, X.; Sun, L.; Shi, Z.; Teng, T.; Lin, L.; He, Z.; Gao, J.; Zhang, S.; et al. Rapid Self-Heating Synthesis of Fe-Based Nanomaterial Catalyst for Advanced Oxidation. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 4975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zuo, S.; Jin, X.; Wang, X.; Lu, Y.; Zhu, Q.; Wang, J.; Liu, W.; Du, Y.; Wang, J. Sandwich Structure Stabilized Atomic Fe Catalyst for Highly Efficient Fenton-like Reaction at All PH Values. Appl. Catal. B 2021, 282, 119551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Shang, Y.; Xu, X.; Gao, B.; Wang, S.; Duan, X. Single-Atom Catalysis in Advanced Oxidation Processes for Environmental Remediation. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2021, 50, 5281–5322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Neta, P.; Huie, R.E.; Ross, A.B. Rate Constants for Reactions of Inorganic Radicals in Aqueous Solution. J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 1988, 17, 1027–1284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Hajalifard, Z.; Mousazadeh, M.; Khademi, S.; Khademi, N.; Jamadi, M.H.; Sillanpää, M. The Efficacious of AOP-Based Processes in Concert with Electrocoagulation in Abatement of CECs from Water/Wastewater. NPJ Clean Water 2023, 6, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ozge, T.; Sibel, B.; Hazal, Ö.; Bahar, Ö.; Gül, Ş.M. Toxicological Profile of 1,4-Benzoquinone and Its Degradation By-Products during Electro-Fenton, Electrocoagulation, and Electrosynthesized Fe(VI) Oxidation. J. Environ. Eng. 2018, 144, 04018124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Yu, L.; Xue, J.; Zhang, L.; Tang, C.; Guo, Y. Fabrication of a Stable Ti/Pb-TiOxNWs/PbO2 Anode and Its Application in Benzoquinone Degradation. Electrochim. Acta 2021, 368, 137532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Yoon, J.; Yang, J.; Shim, Y.; Won, M.S. Electrochemical Degradation of Benzoquinone in a Flow through Cell with Carbon Fibers. Bull. Korean Chem. Soc. 2007, 28, 403–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Espinoza-Montero, P.J.; Vasquez-Medrano, R.; Ibanez, J.G.; Frontana-Uribe, B.A. Efficient Anodic Degradation of Phenol Paired to Improved Cathodic Production of H2O2 at BDD Electrodes. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2013, 160, G3171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Espinoza-Montero, P.J.; Alulema-Pullupaxi, P.; Frontana-Uribe, B.A.; Barrera-Diaz, C.E. Electrochemical Production of Hydrogen Peroxide on Boron-Doped Diamond (BDD) Electrode. Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci. 2022, 26, 100988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Cisneros-León, D.G.; Espinoza-Montero, P.J.; Bolaños-Mendez, D.; Alvarez-Paguay, J.; Fernández, L.; Saavedra-Alulema, P.F.; Lopez, K.; Astorga, D.; Piñeiros, J.L. Electrochemical Degradation of Surfactants in Domestic Wastewater Using a DiaClean® Cell Equipped with a Boron-Doped Diamond Electrode. Front. Chem. 2023, 11, 900670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kapałka, A.; Fóti, G.; Comninellis, C. Kinetic Modelling of the Electrochemical Mineralization of Organic Pollutants for Wastewater Treatment. J. Appl. Electrochem. 2008, 38, 7–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Takagi, K.; Natsui, K.; Watanabe, T.; Einaga, Y. Increasing the Electric Double-Layer Capacitance in Boron-Doped Diamond Electrodes. ChemElectroChem 2019, 6, 1683–1687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Qi, X.; Wang, T.; Long, Y.; Ni, J. Synergetic Antibacterial Activity of Reduced Graphene Oxide and Boron Doped Diamond Anode in Three Dimensional Electrochemical Oxidation System. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 10388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ganiyu, S.O.; Martínez-Huitle, C.A. Nature, Mechanisms and Reactivity of Electrogenerated Reactive Species at Thin-Film Boron-Doped Diamond (BDD) Electrodes During Electrochemical Wastewater Treatment. ChemElectroChem 2019, 6, 2379–2392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Garcia-Segura, S.; Keller, J.; Brillas, E.; Radjenovic, J. Removal of Organic Contaminants from Secondary Effluent by Anodic Oxidation with a Boron-Doped Diamond Anode as Tertiary Treatment. J. Hazard. Mater. 2015, 283, 551–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Martínez-Huitle, C.A.; dos Santos, E.V.; de Araújo, D.M.; Panizza, M. Applicability of Diamond Electrode/Anode to the Electrochemical Treatment of a Real Textile Effluent. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2012, 674, 103–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ganiyu, S.O.; Gamal El-Din, M. Insight into In-Situ Radical and Non-Radical Oxidative Degradation of Organic Compounds in Complex Real Matrix during Electrooxidation with Boron Doped Diamond Electrode: A Case Study of Oil Sands Process Water Treatment. Appl. Catal. B 2020, 279, 119366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Nava, J.L.; Sirés, I.; Brillas, E. Electrochemical Incineration of Indigo. A Comparative Study between 2D (Plate) and 3D (Mesh) BDD Anodes Fitted into a Filter-Press Reactor. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2014, 21, 8485–8492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Yoon, J.; Shim, Y.; Lee, B.-S.; Choi, S.; Won, M.S. Electrochemical Degradation of Phenol and 2-Chlorophenol Using Pt/Ti and Boron-Doped Diamond Electrodes. Bull Korean Chem. Soc. 2012, 33, 2274–2278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Nidheesh, P.V.; Divyapriya, G.; Oturan, N.; Trellu, C.; Oturan, M.A. Environmental Applications of Boron-Doped Diamond Electrodes: 1. Applications in Water and Wastewater Treatment. ChemElectroChem 2019, 6, 2124–2142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Peralta-Reyes, E.; Natividad, R.; Castellanos, M.; Mentado-Morales, J.; Cordero, M.E.; Amado-Piña, D.; Regalado-Méndez, A. Electro-Oxidation of 2-Chlorophenol with BDD Electrodes in a Continuous Flow Electrochemical Reactor. J. Flow Chem. 2020, 10, 437–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Lupa, L.; Cocheci, L.; Trica, B.; Coroaba, A.; Popa, A. Photodegradation of Phenolic Compounds from Water in the Presence of a Pd-Containing Exhausted Adsorbent. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 8440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Regalado-Méndez, A.; Ramos-Hernández, G.; Natividad, R.; Cordero, M.E.; Zárate, L.; Robles-Gómez, E.E.; Pérez-Pastenes, H.; Peralta-Reyes, E. Parametric Mathematical Model of the Electrochemical Degradation of 2-Chlorophenol in a Flow-by Reactor under Batch Recirculation Mode. Water 2023, 15, 4276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Brillas, E.; Sirés, I.; Oturan, M.A. Electro-Fenton Process and Related Electrochemical Technologies Based on Fenton’s Reaction Chemistry. Chem. Rev. 2009, 109, 6570–6631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Stat-Ease. Design Espert 10; Stat-Ease Inc.: Minneapolis, MN, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  36. Regalado-Méndez, A.; Ruiz, M.; Hernández-Servín, J.A.; Natividad, R.; Romero, R.; Cordero, M.E.; Estrada-Vázquez, C.; Peralta-Reyes, E. Electrochemical Mineralization of Ibuprofen on BDD Electrodes in an Electrochemical Flow Reactor: Numerical Optimization Approach. Processes 2020, 8, 1666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Zhou, R.; Zhang, M.; Li, J.; Zhao, W. Optimization of Preparation Conditions for Biochar Derived from Water Hyacinth by Using Response Surface Methodology (RSM) and Its Application in Pb2+ Removal. J. Env. Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 104198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Dixit, S.; Yadav, V.L. Optimization of Polyethylene/Polypropylene/Alkali Modified Wheat Straw Composites for Packaging Application Using RSM. J. Clean Prod. 2019, 240, 118228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Rheem, S.; Rheem, I.; Oh, S. Response Surface Methodology Using a Fullest Balanced Model: A Re-Analysis of a Dataset in the Korean Journal for Food Science of Animal Resources. Korean J. Food Sci. Anim. Resour. 2017, 37, 139–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Javed, S.; Fisse, J.; Vogt, D. Optimization and Kinetic Evaluation for Glycolytic Depolymerization of Post-Consumer PET Waste with Sodium Methoxide. Polymer 2023, 15, 687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Korde, S.; Deshmukh, S.; Tandekar, S.; Jugade, R. Implementation of Response Surface Methodology in Physi-Chemisorption of Indigo Carmine Dye Using Modified Chitosan Composite. Carbohydr. Polym. Technol. Appl. 2021, 2, 100081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Chamoli, S. ANN and RSM Approach for Modeling and Optimization of Designing Parameters for a V down Perforated Baffle Roughened Rectangular Channel. Alex. Eng. J. 2015, 54, 429–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Elaoud, S.C.; Panizza, M.; Cerisola, G.; Mhiri, T. Electrochemical Degradation of Sinapinic Acid on a BDD Anode. Desalination 2011, 272, 148–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. do Vale-Júnior, E.; dos Santos, A.J.; da Silva, D.R.; Fajardo, A.S.; Martínez-Huitle, C.A. Electrochemical Technologies for Detecting and Degrading Benzoquinone Using Diamond Films. ChemElectroChem 2019, 6, 4383–4390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Vasilie, S.; Manea, F.; Baciu, A.; Pop, A. Dual Use of Boron-Doped Diamond Electrode in Antibiotics-Containing Water Treatment and Process Control. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2018, 117, 446–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. da Silva, S.W.; Navarro, E.M.O.; Rodrigues, M.A.S.; Bernardes, A.M.; Pérez-Herranz, V. Using P-Si/BDD Anode for the Electrochemical Oxidation of Norfloxacin. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2019, 832, 112–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Maldonado Domínguez, S.M.; Barrera-Díaz, C.E.; Balderas Hernández, P.; Amado-Piña, D.; Torres-Blancas, T.; Roa-Morales, G. Metronidazole Electro-Oxidation Degradation on a Pilot Scale. Catalysts 2025, 15, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Martín de Vidales, M.J.; Sáez, C.; Cañizares, P.; Rodrigo, M.A. Metoprolol Abatement from Wastewaters by Electrochemical Oxidation with Boron Doped Diamond Anodes. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2012, 87, 225–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Isarain-Chávez, E.; Rodríguez, R.M.; Cabot, P.L.; Centellas, F.; Arias, C.; Garrido, J.A.; Brillas, E. Degradation of Pharmaceutical Beta-Blockers by Electrochemical Advanced Oxidation Processes Using a Flow Plant with a Solar Compound Parabolic Collector. Water Res. 2011, 45, 4119–4130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Regalado-Méndez, A.; Vizarretea-Vásquez, D.; Robles-Gómez, E.E.; Natividad, R.; Escudero, C.J.; Peralta-Reyes, E. Data-Based Modeling, Multi-Objective Optimization, and Multi-Criterion Decision-Making to Maximize the Electro-Oxidation of Metoprolol over Boron-Doped Diamond Electrodes in a Flow-By Reactor. Processes 2024, 12, 1958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Regalado-Méndez, A.; Zavaleta-Avendaño, J.; Alanis-Ramírez, C.; Amado-Piña, D.; Ramírez Serrano, A.; Peralta-Reyes, E. Electrochemical Mineralization of Chloroquine in a Filter-Press-Type Flow Reactor in Batch Recirculation Mode Equipped with Two Boron-Doped Diamond Electrodes: Parametric Optimization, Total Operating Cost, Phytotoxicity Test, and Life Cycle Assessment. Catalysts 2024, 14, 918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (a) Parity plot for p-BQ removal (η); (b) perturbation plot for p-BQ removal (η); (c) Pareto plot.
Figure 1. (a) Parity plot for p-BQ removal (η); (b) perturbation plot for p-BQ removal (η); (c) Pareto plot.
Processes 13 00942 g001
Figure 2. Optimization ramps for initial pH (pH0) and applied current density (j).
Figure 2. Optimization ramps for initial pH (pH0) and applied current density (j).
Processes 13 00942 g002
Figure 3. (a) Three-dimensional surface plot of η based on pH0 and j and (b) overlay plot based on pH0 and j.
Figure 3. (a) Three-dimensional surface plot of η based on pH0 and j and (b) overlay plot based on pH0 and j.
Processes 13 00942 g003
Figure 4. (a) UV-Vis spectra of p-BQ degradation under optimal conditions and (b) p-BQ removal efficiency over time. pH0 of 6.52, j of 0.124, and electrolysis duration of 5 h.
Figure 4. (a) UV-Vis spectra of p-BQ degradation under optimal conditions and (b) p-BQ removal efficiency over time. pH0 of 6.52, j of 0.124, and electrolysis duration of 5 h.
Processes 13 00942 g004
Figure 5. Changes in pH during the p-BQ electro-oxidation process. pH0 of 6.52, j of 0.124 A/cm2, and electrolysis duration of 5 hours.
Figure 5. Changes in pH during the p-BQ electro-oxidation process. pH0 of 6.52, j of 0.124 A/cm2, and electrolysis duration of 5 hours.
Processes 13 00942 g005
Figure 6. Specific energy consumption (SEC) as a function of p-BQ removal efficiency. At a pH0 of 6.52 and a j of 0.124 A/cm2, with a 5 h electrolysis duration.
Figure 6. Specific energy consumption (SEC) as a function of p-BQ removal efficiency. At a pH0 of 6.52 and a j of 0.124 A/cm2, with a 5 h electrolysis duration.
Processes 13 00942 g006
Figure 7. Plot of kinetic reaction models for p-BQ removal. pH0 of 6.52, j of 0.124 A/cm2, and electrolysis duration of 5 h.
Figure 7. Plot of kinetic reaction models for p-BQ removal. pH0 of 6.52, j of 0.124 A/cm2, and electrolysis duration of 5 h.
Processes 13 00942 g007
Table 1. Levels and values of the operating variables.
Table 1. Levels and values of the operating variables.
Operating Variables Levels
−α−10+1
X1: pH02.713.005.007.007.83
X2: j (A/cm2)0.08720.09370.10940.12500.1315
Table 2. Experimental design matrix for p-BQ removal at a volumetric flow rate of 1 L/min.
Table 2. Experimental design matrix for p-BQ removal at a volumetric flow rate of 1 L/min.
RunFactorResponse
pH0j (A/cm2)η (%)
17.000.093782.22
17.000.125098.78
35.000.087297.04
42.170.109460.10
53.000.093781.17
65.000.109489.97
75.000.131595.49
85.000.109487.49
93.000.125061.50
107.830.109490.63
Table 3. Analysis of variance for p-BQ removal.
Table 3. Analysis of variance for p-BQ removal.
SourceSum of SquaresdfMean SquareF-Valuep-Value
Model1615.094403.7724.110.0018Significant
X1828.071828.0749.450.0009
X23.5213.520.21040.6257
X1X2328.291328.2919.600.0068
X12452.821452.8227.040.0035
Residual83.73516.75
Lack of Fit80.66420.166.560.2839Not significant
Pure Error3.0813.08
Cor Total1698.839
R 2 = 0.950 ;   R A d j 2 = 0.911 ;   R Pr e d 2 = 0.813 ; adequate precision = 14.516; coefficient of variance = 4.85
Table 4. Optimization criteria and constraints.
Table 4. Optimization criteria and constraints.
ResponseObjectiveLimits
MinMaxUnitImportance
pH0Within range37Dimensionless+++
jWithin range0.09370.125A/cm2+++
ηMaximized60.198.78%+++
Table 5. Parameters for the three kinetic reaction models.
Table 5. Parameters for the three kinetic reaction models.
Orders (n)kappUnitR2
Pseudo-zero-order1.7307 × 10−4M/h0.7179
Pseudo-first-order0.96601/h0.9737
Pseudo-second-order18879.47451/(M h)0.8465
Table 6. p-BQ removal using electrochemical flow reactors.
Table 6. p-BQ removal using electrochemical flow reactors.
OpNOpAn/CatV
(L)
DE
(%)
DQO
(%)
SEC
(kWh/m3)
OC
(USD/L)
Ref.
Q = 1.0 L/min, [C6H4O2]0 = 0.001 M, pH0 = 6.52, j = 0.124 A/cm2, t = 5 h BDD/BDD2.50097.32---127.853.07This work
Q = 0.0016 L/min, [C6H4O2]0 = 0.01 M, [H2SO4] = 0.5 M, i = 0.124 A, pH = 7, t = 12 hPt/Carbon fiber0.02599.23---------[17]
Q = 5 L/min, [C6H4O2]0 = 0.0092 M
[HClO4] = 0.5 M, j = 0.02 A/cm2, t = 2.5 h
BDD/stainless steel0.400100.008049.50---[3]
DE: degradation efficiency; Op: optimized; NOp: not optimized; An: anode; Cat: cathode.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Peralta-Reyes, E.; Regalado-Méndez, A.; Robles, F.A.; Méndez-Durazno, C.; Espinoza-Montero, P.J. Modeling and Optimization of p-Benzoquinone Degradation via Flow-By Electro-Oxidation on Boron-Doped Diamond Electrodes. Processes 2025, 13, 942. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13040942

AMA Style

Peralta-Reyes E, Regalado-Méndez A, Robles FA, Méndez-Durazno C, Espinoza-Montero PJ. Modeling and Optimization of p-Benzoquinone Degradation via Flow-By Electro-Oxidation on Boron-Doped Diamond Electrodes. Processes. 2025; 13(4):942. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13040942

Chicago/Turabian Style

Peralta-Reyes, Ever, Alejandro Regalado-Méndez, Frida A. Robles, Carlos Méndez-Durazno, and Patricio J. Espinoza-Montero. 2025. "Modeling and Optimization of p-Benzoquinone Degradation via Flow-By Electro-Oxidation on Boron-Doped Diamond Electrodes" Processes 13, no. 4: 942. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13040942

APA Style

Peralta-Reyes, E., Regalado-Méndez, A., Robles, F. A., Méndez-Durazno, C., & Espinoza-Montero, P. J. (2025). Modeling and Optimization of p-Benzoquinone Degradation via Flow-By Electro-Oxidation on Boron-Doped Diamond Electrodes. Processes, 13(4), 942. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13040942

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop