The Experimental and Numerical Studies on Optimizing Injection Strategies for Microspheres-Alternating-Nanoemulsion Flooding in Tight Reservoirs

In recent years, the production of tight reservoirs with waterflooding in China has entered a progressively declining phase with unstable oil rate and higher water cut, rising challenges to any further enhancement of oil recovery. Targeting the high water cut and complex pore structure characteristics typical of these reservoirs, this work evaluates the reservoir compatibility of a microspheres-alternating-nanoemulsion flooding process and optimizes its injection strategy. Representative reservoir scenarios were first established; laser-particle-size analyzers and other laboratory instruments were then employed to quantify formulation-reservoir compatibility. A multiscale numerical study has been performed with CMG-STARS v.2022. The core-scale simulations systematically examined the influence of key factors on displacement efficiency improvement and water cut reduction, matched with the experimental results of core flooding tests. The combined experimental/numerical workflow furnishes a theoretical framework for optimizing the injection scheme. Beyond assessing formulation compatibility, the study delivers optimized injection parameters and strategies for microspheres-alternating-nanoemulsion flooding, providing both theoretical analysis and practical technology reference for improving oil recovery in tight reservoirs with higher water cut. Specifically, when the microsphere concentration increased from 0.1% to 0.3%, the minimum water cut was reduced by approximately 5%, while further concentration increases showed no significant additional impact on water content. Compared with water flooding, the relative permeability curve of the microspheres-alternating-nanoemulsion flooding system shifted entirely to the right. Numerical simulation of representative well groups revealed that a slug design with a microsphere-to-nanoemulsion ratio of 1:3 yielded the optimal enhanced oil recovery effect, and after ten years of production, the recovery factor increased by 0.46%.