Previous Article in Journal
Performance and Economic Analysis of a High-Efficiency Wide-Working Load Distillation System with Combined Ejector
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Effect of Agitation and the Use of Perfluorodecalin on Lipase Production by Yarrowia lipolytica in a Bioreactor
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Insights on the Separation of Kraft Lignin from Betaine-Based Eutectic Solvents: A Liquid–Liquid Equilibrium and Partitioning Study

by
Fernanda Sossai Altoé
,
Dulce Maria Santos
,
Sérgio M. Vilas-Boas
* and
Mariana Conceição da Costa
*
Department of Process and Product Design (DDPP), School of Chemical Engineering (FEQ), University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Av. Albert Einstein, 500, Campinas 13083-852, São Paulo, Brazil
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Processes 2025, 13(12), 3784; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13123784 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 15 October 2025 / Revised: 9 November 2025 / Accepted: 21 November 2025 / Published: 23 November 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Green Solvent for Separation and Extraction Processes)

Abstract

Lignocellulosic biomass, composed predominantly of cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin, is the main raw material for biorefineries. Eutectic solvents (ESs) are promising green alternatives for biomass delignification due to their low cost, reduced toxicity, and high lignin solubilization capacity. However, challenges associated with lignin recovery and ES recycling hinder their industrial application. This work addresses this challenge by investigating the liquid–liquid equilibrium (LLE) and the Kraft lignin partition (KLignin) in biphasic solvent systems composed of betaine-based ES, water, and a cosolvent (1-butanol or ethyl acetate) at 298.2 K. Four hydrogen bond donors (HBDs) were used to prepare the ESs: urea, ethylene glycol, 1,3-propanediol, and 1,4-butanediol. In nearly all systems, lignin was found to preferentially partition to the top, cosolvent-rich phase, supporting the viability of this recovery approach. In general, 1-butanol created larger biphasic regions, and for the systems with 1,3-propanediol and 1,4-butanediol as HBDs, yielded higher lignin partition than ethyl acetate. The system containing 1,4-butanediol-based ES with 1-butanol was identified as the most promising, achieving exceptionally high KLignin values (up to 456.5). These results provide fundamental data for designing effective lignin recovery and ES recycling processes in biorefineries.
Keywords: Kraft lignin; eutectic mixtures; liquid–liquid equilibrium; two-phase systems; partition coefficient; sustainability; biorefinery Kraft lignin; eutectic mixtures; liquid–liquid equilibrium; two-phase systems; partition coefficient; sustainability; biorefinery

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Altoé, F.S.; Santos, D.M.; Vilas-Boas, S.M.; da Costa, M.C. Insights on the Separation of Kraft Lignin from Betaine-Based Eutectic Solvents: A Liquid–Liquid Equilibrium and Partitioning Study. Processes 2025, 13, 3784. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13123784

AMA Style

Altoé FS, Santos DM, Vilas-Boas SM, da Costa MC. Insights on the Separation of Kraft Lignin from Betaine-Based Eutectic Solvents: A Liquid–Liquid Equilibrium and Partitioning Study. Processes. 2025; 13(12):3784. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13123784

Chicago/Turabian Style

Altoé, Fernanda Sossai, Dulce Maria Santos, Sérgio M. Vilas-Boas, and Mariana Conceição da Costa. 2025. "Insights on the Separation of Kraft Lignin from Betaine-Based Eutectic Solvents: A Liquid–Liquid Equilibrium and Partitioning Study" Processes 13, no. 12: 3784. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13123784

APA Style

Altoé, F. S., Santos, D. M., Vilas-Boas, S. M., & da Costa, M. C. (2025). Insights on the Separation of Kraft Lignin from Betaine-Based Eutectic Solvents: A Liquid–Liquid Equilibrium and Partitioning Study. Processes, 13(12), 3784. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13123784

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop