Next Article in Journal
An Iterative Backbone Algorithm for Service Network Design Problems
Previous Article in Journal
Highly Efficient Regioselective Acylation of Dihydromyricetin Catalyzed by Lipase in Nonaqueous Solvents
Previous Article in Special Issue
Design, Implementation and Simulation of a Small-Scale Biorefinery Model
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Special Issue: Mathematical Modeling and Control of Bioprocesses

by
Philippe Bogaerts
1,* and
Alain Vande Wouwer
2,*
1
Brussels School of Engineering, Université Libre de Bruxelles, 3BIO-BioControl, Av. F.-D. Roosevelt 50, CP 165-61, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium
2
Faculté Polytechnique de Mons, Université de Mons, Systems, Estimation, Control and Optimization (SECO), B-7000 Mons, Belgium
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Processes 2022, 10(7), 1372; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10071372
Submission received: 4 July 2022 / Accepted: 12 July 2022 / Published: 14 July 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Mathematical Modeling and Control of Bioprocesses)
This Special Issue (SI) of Processes on Mathematical Modeling and Control of Bioprocesses (MMCB) contains papers focusing, on the one hand, on mathematical modeling of biological processes at different scales ranging from microscopic to macroscopic levels and, on the other hand, on model-based estimation, optimization and control of these processes.

1. Mathematical Modeling of Biological Processes at Microscopic Scale

At the microscopic scale, metabolic networks are often used to model cell behavior in different culture conditions. Three papers of the SI on MMCB are focused on metabolic network modeling. One of the major issues with models based on metabolic networks is their underdetermination, in the sense that the number of unknown intracellular fluxes to be determined is usually higher than the number of available equations corresponding to the mass balances and the available measurements. Bogaerts and Vande Wouwer [1] review various methods to tackle this underdetermination, among which are flux pathway analysis, flux balance analysis, flux variability analysis and sampling of the flux solution space. One of these methods, namely Dynamic Flux Balance Analysis, is used by Shen and Budman [2] to infer metabolite concentrations for which hardware measurements are not available. A variable structure system, describing different regions of the state space, is introduced and a set membership-based approach is used to estimate the unmeasured concentrations from few available measurements. To completely circumvent the abovementioned problem of system underdetermination, Bastin et al. [3] use relatively simple macroscopic models that allow obtaining a unique flux distribution to describe VERO cell behavior in different bioreactor culture conditions, e.g., exponential growth phase or substrate-limited growth phase. Such models could be used to develop feedback control strategies in fed-batch or perfused bioreactors.

2. Mathematical Modeling of Biological Processes at Macroscopic Scale

At a more macroscopic scale, four papers of the SI on MMCB focus on dynamic models for describing different processes, i.e., production of biopolymers [4], production of biopesticides [5], biodegradation [6] and biorefinery of second-generation biomass [7]. Duvigneau et al. [4] propose a new kinetic model for describing the production of the bio-copolymer poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) (PHBV), which has a broad range of applications and is easier to process than the classical homopolymer poly(3-hydroxybutyrate). Given the coupling of CO2 online measurements in the exhaust gas to biomass production, the model allows for predicting the composition and current yield of PHBV along the process. Monroy et al. [5] propose and compare different kinetic models for three different strains of Bacillus thuringiensis ssp Kurstaki, a microorganism used for the production of biopesticides. The main goal of the model is to estimate the total protein productivity, yield and titer. Based on several experimental datasets, a dynamical model is finally selected with the Akaike information criterion. Dimitrova and Zlateva [6] propose a mathematical model for the biodegradation of a phenol and cresol mixture in a continuously stirred bioreactor, with a specific growth rate that involves sum kinetics with interaction parameters (SKIP) and inhibition effects. The global stabilizability of the model dynamics towards equilibrium points is analyzed and illustrated with numerical examples. Sbarciog et al. [7] propose a biorefinery model that integrates several processes, among which are steam refining, anaerobic digestion, ammonia stripping and composting. The overall goal is the model-based optimization of the process. The authors illustrate with simulation results the potential to efficiently produce oligosaccharides, lignin, fibers, biogas, fertilizer and compost from real collected biowaste.

3. Model-Based Estimation, Optimization and Control of Biological Processes

This SI on MMBC also focuses attention on recent developments in monitoring and optimization of biological systems, where mathematical models can of course play an important role, as reflected by four articles.
Sokač et al. [8] review the application of mathematical modeling and optimization for enhancing composting, which is a complex process whose efficiency is influenced by temperature, pH, moisture content, C/N ratio, particle size, nutrient content and oxygen supply. In [9], Djema et al. derive optimal control strategies based on the Pontryagin maximum principle in order to ensure the domination of the strain of interest in cultures of microalgae in the chemostat described by the Droop model. Sari [10] considers one-step and two-step models of anaerobic digestion together with a large class of growth functions encountered in applications, and studies their operating diagrams as a function of the dilution rate and inlet concentration, so as to define the best operating conditions for biogas production. In [11], Wallocha and Popp present an off-gas-based software sensor for real-time biomass estimation in continuous single-use bioreactors with CHO cell lines. They discuss the interest of considering viable cell volume concentration (instead of the density) as cell size or volume can have a direct impact on oxygen demand.
Finally, two articles are devoted to controller design and implementation, addressing important practical aspects of bioprocess control strategy deployment.
Colin-Robles et al. [12] consider the maximization of the hydrogen production rate in a microbial electrolysis cell. Using the golden section search optimization algorithm coupled with a robust super-twisting controller, the cell is brought to the maximum of a static performance map. The proposed optimization strategy is embedded in an FPGA throughout different digital architectures that are executed in parallel without hardware sharing. In [13], Butkus et al. propose a gain scheduling approach, which is based on controller input/output signals only and does not require additional online measurements of cultivation process variables for the adaptation of controller parameters. The approach is used to control dissolved oxygen concentration in a bioreactor operated in fed-batch mode.

Author Contributions

Both authors contributed equally. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bogaerts, P.; Vande Wouwer, A. How to Tackle Underdeterminacy in Metabolic Flux Analysis? A Tutorial and Critical Review. Processes 2021, 9, 1577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Shen, X.; Budman, H. Set Membership Estimation with Dynamic Flux Balance Models. Processes 2021, 9, 1762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Bastin, G.; Chotteau, V.; Wouwer, A.V. Metabolic Flux Analysis of VERO Cells under Various Culture Conditions. Processes 2021, 9, 2097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Duvigneau, S.; Dürr, R.; Behrens, J.; Kienle, A. Advanced Kinetic Modeling of Bio-co-polymer Poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) Production Using Fructose and Propionate as Carbon Sources. Processes 2021, 9, 1260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Monroy, T.S.; Abdelmalek, N.; Rouis, S.; Kallassy, M.; Saad, J.; Abboud, J.; Cescut, J.; Bensaid, N.; Fillaudeau, L.; Aceves-Lara, C.A. Dynamic Model for Biomass and Proteins Production by Three Bacillus Thuringiensis ssp Kurstaki Strains. Processes 2021, 9, 2147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Dimitrova, N.; Zlateva, P. Global Stability Analysis of a Bioreactor Model for Phenol and Cresol Mixture Degradation. Processes 2021, 9, 124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Sbarciog, M.; De Buck, V.; Akkermans, S.; Bhonsale, S.; Polanska, M.; Van Impe, J.F.M. Design, Implementation and Simulation of a Small-Scale Biorefinery Model. Processes 2022, 10, 829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Sokač, T.; Valinger, D.; Benković, M.; Jurina, T.; Kljusurić, J.G.; Redovniković, I.R.; Tušek, A.J. Application of Optimization and Modeling for the Composting Process Enhancement. Processes 2022, 10, 229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Djema, W.; Bayen, T.; Bernard, O. Optimal Darwinian Selection of Microorganisms with Internal Storage. Processes 2022, 10, 461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Sari, T. Best Operating Conditions for Biogas Production in Some Simple Anaerobic Digestion Models. Processes 2022, 10, 258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wallocha, T.; Popp, O. Off-Gas-Based Soft Sensor for Real-Time Monitoring of Biomass and Metabolism in Chinese Hamster Ovary Cell Continuous Processes in Single-Use Bioreactors. Processes 2021, 9, 2073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Colin-Robles, J.; Torres-Zúñiga, I.; Ibarra-Manzano, M.A.; Alcaraz-González, V. FPGA-Based Implementation of an Optimization Algorithm to Maximize the Productivity of a Microbial Electrolysis Cell. Processes 2021, 9, 1111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Butkus, M.; Levišauskas, D.; Galvanauskas, V. Simple Gain-Scheduled Control System for Dissolved Oxygen Control in Bioreactors. Processes 2021, 9, 1493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bogaerts, P.; Vande Wouwer, A. Special Issue: Mathematical Modeling and Control of Bioprocesses. Processes 2022, 10, 1372. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10071372

AMA Style

Bogaerts P, Vande Wouwer A. Special Issue: Mathematical Modeling and Control of Bioprocesses. Processes. 2022; 10(7):1372. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10071372

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bogaerts, Philippe, and Alain Vande Wouwer. 2022. "Special Issue: Mathematical Modeling and Control of Bioprocesses" Processes 10, no. 7: 1372. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10071372

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop