Linear Golden Section Speed Adaptive Control of Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor Based on Model Design
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
The subject matter is of great interest to a wide audience, however:
1. It is not clear in the introduction how this work differs from other previously published works.
2. It is also recommended to include at the end of the introduction a more specific description of what has been covered in the other sections.
3. It is important to elaborate in more detail on the method for modelling and control of the proposed PMSM.
4. In the results obtained, it is important to highlight the performance of the proposed technique, i.e. in terms of over-stepping and settling times. In this way, the simulation and experimental results can be summarised in a table.
5. It is important to improve the wording as in some sections (e.g. line 288) it is not clear which Figure is being referred to. In this path, there are figures that can be better organised.
6. It is recommended to aggregate the proposed control and the traditional PID control in the same chart.
7. Correct labels in some graphs that appear written in Chinese (Figs. 16 and 17).
8. It is necessary to add a more detailed conclusion on the results.
Author Response
Please see the attachment
Author Response File: 
Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 2 Report
The subject of the article and the method used are new and appropriate. But in order to improve the work, it is better to observe the following items.
- It is better to use numerical results in the abstract.
- It is also a good idea to review neural network-based methods, such as:https://doi.org/10.3390/app112110392 ; https://doi.org/10.1108/COMPEL-04-2020-0137 ; https://doi.org/10.3103/S014641162109008X
- In general, the introduction is weak and it is better to consider several methods to control PMSM.
- How do you ensure the correctness of Equation 6? Perhaps the greater the number of delays, achive the better response.
- How did you get the parameter update equation (Equation 8)?
- What are the conditions mentioned in line 128 based on?
- What data are the variables in Equation 10 estimated on?
- What is the speed sensor used in Figure 9? Is it possible that the sensor has an error?
- To improve your work and show its efficiency, it is better to compare with another method.
- In the conclusion section, it is better to provide suggestions for further work.
Author Response
Please see the attachment
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Round 2
Reviewer 1 Report
It is clear that they have addressed the observations made. However:
1. References [22] and [23] are not cited in the article.
2. I must insist on the quality of the figures.
3. A discussion of the results obtained should be expanded. For example, table 2, introduced in the new version, only shows the results of the methods but does not mention anything else.
Author Response
请参阅附件
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 2 Report
All comments have been responded. The paper can be published.
Author Response
Dear reviewers,
We are very grateful to the editors and all the reviewers for their time spend making positive constructive comments. Thank you for these valuable suggestions to further improve our paper.
Thank you and best regards.
