Next Article in Journal
Data-Driven Evaluation of the Synergetic Development of Regional Carbon Emissions in the Yangtze River Delta
Next Article in Special Issue
Optimization and Prediction of Stability of Emulsified Liquid Membrane (ELM): Artificial Neural Network
Previous Article in Journal
Plant Extraction in Water: Towards Highly Efficient Industrial Applications
Previous Article in Special Issue
Assessment and Removal of Heavy Metals and Other Ions from the Industrial Wastewater of Faisalabad, Pakistan
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Study of Solidifying Surplus Sludge as Building Material Using Ordinary Portland Cement

College of Civil Engineering, Liaoning Petrochemical University, Fushun 113001, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Processes 2022, 10(11), 2234; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10112234
Submission received: 9 October 2022 / Revised: 26 October 2022 / Accepted: 28 October 2022 / Published: 31 October 2022

Abstract

:
In an attempt to effectively utilize a multitude of surplus sludge from sewage treatment plants, ordinary Portland cement was used to solidify the dry surplus sludge as a building material. The dry surplus sludge and cement were mixed at different proportions with a certain dosage of water and then cured for 3–60 days at room temperature. The unconfined compression strength (RC) of solidified blocks was investigated with respect to the effects of the ratio of liquid to solid (Rl/S), surplus sludge dosage (DS), the dosage of sodium silicate (DNa2SiO3), and the proportion of fly ash (WF). The fabricated solidified blocks were characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), Fourier transform-infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR), and X-ray Diffraction Analysis (XRD). The results demonstrated that RC at 60 days reduced obviously with the increase in Rl/s when Ds was given, whereas RC reduced with DS increased to 15.0 wt% from 5.0 wt% for solidified blocks. When DS was 5.0 wt%, RC of 28 days was reduced from 20.87 MPa to 14.50 MPa, with an increase in Rl/s from 0.35 to 0.55. For the given Rl/s, such as Rl/s = 0.35, RC at 60 days was 23.75 MPa, 2.80 MPa, and 2.50 MPa when DS were 5.0 wt%, 10.0 wt%, and 15.0 wt%, respectively, which were relatively lower in comparison to that of Portland cement solidified blocks without surplus sludge (51.40 MPa). In addition, the addition of Na2SiO3 and fly ash was favorable in terms of improving the RC for solidified blocks. RC of 60 days increased initially and then reduced with the increase in DNa2SiO3 from 0.0 wt% to 9.0 wt% at Rl/s = 0.45 and DS = 5.0 wt%. At DNa2SiO3 = 7.5 wt%, Rl/s = 0.45, and DS = 5.0 wt%, the highest RC value of 34.70 MPa was achieved after being cured for 60 days. Furthermore, RC of 60 days increased initially and then reduced with WF increasing from 0.0 wt% to 25.0 wt%, and the highest RC value of 34.35 MPa was achieved at WF = 10.0 wt%, Rl/s = 0.45, and DS = 5.0 wt%. At the ratio of DNa2SiO3 = 7.50 wt%, Rl/S = 0.35, WF = 20 wt%, DS = 15.0 wt% and M = 1.00, RC of 28 days reached 26.70 MPa. With these values, the utilization of sludge utilized (DS = 15.0 wt%) was increased by double compared with DS = 5.0 wt% (20.87 MPa). To investigate the effect of environmental temperature on the mechanical properties and mass of solidified blocks, the freeze-thaw cycling experiment was carried out. The RC of 28 days and the mass of the solidified block reduced with the number of freeze-thaw cycles, increasing for solidified blocks with DS of 5.0 wt%, 10.0 wt%, and 15.0 wt%, manifesting a decrease of 25.60%, 32.30%, and 40.60% for RC and 3.40%, 4.10%, and 4.90% for mass, respectively. This work provides sufficient evidence that surplus sludge has a huge potential application for building materials from the perspective of improving their mechanical properties. It provides an important theoretical basis for the disposal as well as efficient utilization of sludge.

1. Introduction

The surplus sludge is produced as a solid precipitate in the municipal wastewater treatment processes, such as physical separation or the gravitational precipitation process [1]. The amount of surplus sludge has been escalating worldwide at an alarming rate with an increase in the amount of municipal sewage due to the rapid development of population, urbanization, industrialization, sewage drainage systems, and wastewater treatment facilities [2,3,4,5,6]. Commonly, the surplus sludge contains four kinds of compounds, apart from moisture [4,7,8,9], heavy metals [1,2,3,4,8,9,10,11,12]; organic and inorganic compounds [2,3,8,9,11,12,13,14]; microorganisms, such as E. coli, Salmonella spp., and Enterococcus [1,2,3,4,8,10,11,12,13,14]; and solid granules [8,12], which are harmful to soil, vegetation, animals, and humans [3,4,11,15,16,17,18,19]. Conventional treatment methods for treating surplus sludge, such as landfilling, deposition into the ocean, and composting, are being phased out due to their ecotoxicological risks and the concerns raised by the public and environmentalists regarding the potential toxicity of untreated sewage sludge to the environment [2,3,4,17]. The development of more cutting-edge treatment technologies is urgent.
The newer surplus sludge treatment methods can be divided into three types, namely, thermal treatment [4,17,18,20,21,22], biological treatment [1,14,23,24,25,26,27], and chemical treatment [2,4,19,28,29]. The following metrics can be used to evaluate how well various sludge treatment techniques perform: carbon or nitrogen recovery, volume/weight reduction, pathogen elimination, and stabilization of heavy metals or organic matter [1,2]. Thermal treatments such as pyrolysis, incineration, gasification, hydrothermal carbonization, or supercritical water gasification are effective for weight reduction, and could convert the carbon into biofuels while consuming less energy [1,2,30]. Although it takes longer, the biological treatment uses less energy to recover carbon [1]. However, in China, these methods are hardly ever used. Until 2016, China used about 25% of its surplus sludge for composting and material recovery [1,7].
Solidification/stabilization (S/S) technology is an important method at present in the disposal of solid waste, which could limit the release of harmful chemicals into the environment [31,32,33]. The contaminants are chemically bound during the stabilization process and mechanically bound during the solidification process [31]. This method was initially applied for the management of sludge and later for soil remediation [32]. The S/S technology has attracted the attention of many remediation practitioners due to its capacity to accomplish rapid remedial objectives at a comparatively low cost [32], so that leftover sludge can be transformed into a type of building material using S/S technology. One of the primary cementing materials for conventional S/S technology is ordinary Portland cement, which is widely accessible and reasonably priced [33].
In this work, ordinary Portland cement was used to solidify the surplus sludge for comprehensive utilization. The unconfined compressive strength (RC) was mainly used to assess the possibility of application in the building materials field. The fly ash and sodium silicate (Na2SiO3) were added to the surplus sludge solidification process to improve the RC. The effects of the ratio of liquid to solid (Rl/S), surplus sludge dosage (DS), dosages of sodium silicate (DNa2SiO3) and fly ash (WF), and the sodium silicate modulus (molar ratio of SiO2 to Na2O in sodium silicate, shorted as M) on the RC of cement–surplus sludge solidified blocks (hereafter referred to as solidified blocks) were investigated. The solidified blocks were characterized by scanning electron microscopes (SEM), X-ray Diffraction Analysis (XRD), and Fourier transform-infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR). To investigate the effect of environmental temperature on the mechanical properties of solidified blocks, the freeze-thaw cycling experiment was carried out. Cement–surplus sludge solidified blocks fabricated in this work have been designed to furnish enough mechanical strength for use as a building material and for utilization in a low-temperature environment. This work would provide a theoretical basis for the application of surplus sludge in building materials.

2. Experiments

2.1. Materials

The surplus sludge used in the solidification experiment was obtained from the Haicheng wastewater treatment plant in Liaoning province (China). Industrial grade ordinary Portland cement (P.O. 42.5) was purchased from Fushun Da Huang Cement Co., China (Fushun, China). Analytical grade sodium silicate (Na2SiO3) was purchased from Shanghai Rhawn Chemical Technology Co. (Shanghai, China), with the modulus varying in the range of 1.00–2.43. Fly ash was purchased from Henan Gongyi Longze Water Purification Material Co. (Gongyi City, China). The ingredients are listed in Table 1. Fly ash and Na2SiO3 were used as received. Deionized water was obtained from a Hitech-Kflow water purification system (Hitech Co., Beijing, China).

2.2. Property Analysis of Surplus Sludge

Using a mass-loss technique, the moisture and organic components in surplus sludge were examined. The surplus sludge was dried for 12 h at 105 °C in an oven (Shanghai Jinghong Experimental Equipment Co., Shanghai, China), using a mount (m0 = 20.0 g) placed in a culture dish. The surplus sludge was then chilled in a drier. The mass of the leftovers was measured (m1). The water content (ww), which can be determined using the Formula (1), was the mass removed from the sludge throughout this procedure. The organic mass (m2) in the remaining dry sludge was reduced in weight by calcining it at 600 °C for 3 h without using a lid in a muffle furnace (Resistance Furnace Temperature Controller, Shaoxing Shangyu Road market branch analysis instrument factory, China), and the organic content (wo) can be calculated using the Formula (2). The amount of residue (wa) in surplus sludge can be calculated using Formula (3). The findings showed that the surplus sludge contained 84.6 wt% water, 10.8 wt% residues, and 29.9 wt% organic material (amounting to 29.9 wt% in dry surplus sludge).
w w = m 0 m 1 m 0 × 100 %
w o = m 2 m 0 × 100 %
w a = 1 w w w o
The total organic carbon (TOC) value of dry surplus sludge was 25.4 wt%, which was measured by the MultiN/C 3100 TOC instrument (Jena, Germany), and was consistent with the result from the calcination method.
The pH value of surplus sludge was measured according to a standard of determination method for municipal sludge in wastewater treatment plants (CJ/T 221-2005) [34]. About 5.0 g surplus sludge was placed in a 200 mL glass bottle, 50.0 mL of deionized water was added to it, and the bottle was covered with a cap. The mixture was then shaken in a THZ-82 thermostatic water bath shaker (Wuhan Grey Mo Lai Detection Equipment Co., Wuhan, China) at 270 cycles∙min−1 at 25.0 °C for 4 h and then deposited for 48 h at room temperature. By using the electrode method, the pH of the supernatant was determined to be 7.3, which is the pH of the surplus sludge.

2.3. Solidification Experiment of the Surplus Sludge

The surplus sludge in this solidification experiment was pre-treated by having the water removed by being heated at 105 °C for 16 h before being solidified. The dry surplus sludge was then broken up using a 1.0 mm sieve and a DS-1 high-speed tissue masher (Shanghai Specimen Model Factory Co., Shanghai, China) and sifted using a sieve with an aperture of 1.0 mm. Then, a given amount of the powdered filter residue powder was mixed and then combined with a predetermined quantity of ordinary Portland cement, Na2SiO3, or fly ash. The solid mixtures were mixed with deionized water at a mass ratio of liquid to solid (Rl/s) of 0.35–0.55 using a YD90S-8/4 cement mortar mixer (Wuxi Construction Engineering Test Equipment Co., Wuxi, China) for 20 min to obtain a cement mixed mortar. The solid mixtures were mixed with deionized water at a mass ratio of liquid to solid (Rl/S) of 0.35–0.55 to create a cement mixed mortar. The designed solidification experimental scheme is shown in Table 2. Table 2 displays the planned solidification experimental plan. In the table, the designed surplus sludge dosage (Ds) varied in the range of 0.0~15.0 wt% in the solid mixtures. The designed surplus sludge dosage (Ds) in the solid mixtures ranged from 0.0 wt% to 15.0 wt% in the table. The dosage of Na2SiO3 (DNa2SiO3) and the proportion of fly ash varied in the range of 0.0–9.0 wt% and 0.0~15.0 wt%. The cement mix mortar was shaken in a shaking table for 20 min to remove air bubbles, and then poured into a cubic plexiglass mold with an inner diameter of 40 mm × 40 mm × 40 mm, purchased from the Fushun Plexiglass factory. The cement mix mortar in the cubic plexiglass mold was cured for 3–60 days at room temperature to form the solidified blocks. The unconfined compression strength (RC) of solidified blocks was measured using a compression testing machine (Jinan Dong Fang Test Instrument Co., Jinan, China), for which the loading rate was 2400 ± 200 N/s. The RC can be calculated using the following Formula (4).
RC = FC/A
where FC is the maximum load at failure, of which the unit is N. A is the pressure area with the unit of mm2 (40 mm × 40 mm).

2.4. Freeze-Thaw Recycle Experiment

The freeze-thaw recycle experiment was designed to investigate the effect of temperature (T) on unconfined compressive strength (RC). The solidified blocks were prepared according to Table 3 and cured for 28 days at room temperature. After that, the solidified blocks were immersed in water and put into a freeze-thaw cycle testing machine ( machine, Nanjing Jiedi Electronic Equipment Manufacturing Co., Nanjing, China) to evaluate the freeze-thaw cycle. After an initial drop in temperature from 8 °C to −18 °C within 60 min, the temperature stayed that way for another 60 min before rising to 8 °C. A freeze-thaw cycle is used and takes 4 h. A freeze-thaw cycle temperature diagram is shown in Figure 1. The solidified blocks A-C in Table 3 underwent freeze-thaw cycles of 0–50. Every 10 freeze-thaw cycles, the mass and RC of solidified block samples were measured.
In all the above experiments, each test was conducted in triplicate, and the final RC values were an average of the three measurements. For comparison, blank tests were performed for the Portland cement in the absence of the surplus sludge. The solidified blocks of DS0, B3S0, and F15S0 are the blank samples for investigating the effects of DNa2SiO3 and WF on the RC of the Portland cement solidified blocks.

2.5. Characterization

The prepared solidified blocks were crushed using a compression testing machine (Jinan Dong Fang Test Instrument Co., Jinan, China) and the specimen was collected. Then, the specimen was ground to powder. The powder sample was characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray diffraction (XRD), and Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectra. The morphologies of solidified block samples were observed using scanning electron microscope imaging (SEM, Supra 55, Zeiss, Jena, Germany). Crystal structures were determined by powder X-ray diffraction (XRD), using a D/max-rA model diffractometer (Bruker Co., Germany) with Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.54184 Å) operating at 40 kV and 40 mA. Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectra were recorded using a Vertex 70 model infrared spectrometer (Bruker Co., Hanau, Germany) using standard KBr discs.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. The Characterization of Surplus Sludge and Solidified Blocks

The surplus sludge was solidified by the Portland cement with mechanical strength. Figure 2 shows the images of the prepared solidified blocks. Solidified blocks rarely shrank or expanded in volume.

3.1.1. FTIR Spectra of Raw Materials and Solidified Blocks

Figure 3a presents the FTIR spectra of the surplus sludge ash residue, dry surplus sludge, fly ash, and Na2SiO3. The peaks at 3432 cm1, 1650 cm1, and 1451 cm1 in the spectrum of surplus sludge may be attributed to the asymmetric stretching vibration and bending vibration of the O-H bond of crystalline hydrate existing within the surplus sludge [35,36]. The two absorption peaks at 2923 cm−1 and 2852 cm−1 are the characteristic absorptions of the asymmetric and symmetric C-H and -CH2- bonds, which may arise from the carbon skeleton of various organic compounds that formed the sludge [37,38]. The absorption peaks at 3432 cm−1, 2923 cm−1, 2852 cm−1, 1650 cm−1, and 1451 cm−1 are weakened in the spectrum for the surplus sludge ash because most of the organics and crystalline hydrate were burned out mostly at 600 °C. The wide peak at about 1004~1094 cm−1 is the asymmetric vibration of the Si-O-T (T is Si or Al) bond from the SiO2 and Al2O3 contained in the raw materials [35,38]. The absorption peaks at 556 cm−1 and 539 cm−1 may be assigned to Fe-O lattice vibrations, and the peak at 463 cm−1 is Si-O bending vibration [35,38]. These Fe-O and Si-O bonds may form from the Fe flocculating agent and sandstone contained in surplus sludge.
In Figure 3b, the absorptions peaks of 3432 cm−1, 2923 cm−1, 2852 cm−1, 539 cm−1, and 463 cm−1 in surplus sludge appeared in the infrared spectra of B3.0, B7.5, B9.0, F5, F15, and F25 samples. It demonstrated that surplus sludge was solidified in cement solidified blocks. The asymmetric stretching vibration, in-plane, and out-of-plane vibrations, and bending vibration of the O-H bond of crystalline hydrate existent in surplus sludge–cement solidified blocks from hydration reaction is responsible for the peeks at 1606 cm1 and 1425 cm1, respectively [35,36]. The results are consistent with the reports [35].

3.1.2. SEM Micrographs of Solidified Blocks

Figure 4 represents the SEM micrographs of raw materials and solidified blocks. Figure 4a–c show the sludge was a clumped granular structure, the Portland cement solidified blocks (DS0) mainly existed as a lamellar structure, whereas the fly ash manifested a faveolate structure. While image Figure 4d presents flake-like structures, indicating the surplus sludge was solidified by cement. When Na2SiO3 was added during the solidification process, the lamellar structure from Portland cement solidified blocks was unchanged, as shown in Figure 4e. The images in Figure 4f–h show that the large block structure was gradually replaced by small compact block structures with the increase in dosage of Na2SiO3. Compared with the image presented in Figure 4c, a thick rod crystal and acicular crystal appeared in the image in Figure 4i. In photo Figure 4j, the dry surplus sludge was wrapped by a faveolate structure, lamellar structure, and a long rodlike structure. Several clavate structures appear in sample F10.0 (Figure 4k). The degree of fragmental block structure increases in sample F15.0 (Figure 4l).

3.1.3. X-ray Diffraction Analysis (XRD) of Solidified Blocks

Figure 5 is the XRD diffraction spectra of the solidified blocks. It is shown that the principal components of the solidified blocks were SiO2, aluminosilicate, and CaCO3. The results were consistent with the previous research [35,39,40]. Aluminosilicate maybe consisted of the calcium silicate hydrate (C-S-H) and calcium aluminate hydrate (C-A-H).

3.2. Effects of DS and Rl/S on RC of Solidified Blocks

Figure 6 shows the effects of surplus sludge dosage (Ds) and the ratio of liquid to solid (Rl/s) on the unconfined compressive strength (RC) of solidified blocks. The RC reached the equilibrium value at about 28 days for Figure 6a and at 60 days for Figure 6b–d. The reason was that the substitution of surplus sludge for some of the Portland cement reduced the curing rate and required more time to form the strength phase than solidified blocks made entirely of Portland cement.
Compared with RC of Portland cement solidified blocks, Figure 6 also shows that RC reduced with Rl/s increasing at a given DS and reduced with DS increasing from 0.0 wt% to 15.0 wt% when Rl/s varied in the range of 0.35~0.55. For instance, RC of 60 days reduced to 23.75 MPa from 52.05 MPa at Rl/s = 0.35 when DS increased to 5.0 wt% from 0.0 wt%, reducing by a total of 54.37%. Furthermore, the RC reduced with Rl/s increasing from 0.35 to 0.55 at the given DS. RC of 60 days reduced from 2.80 MPa to 1.90 MPa with the increase in Rl/s from 0.35 to 0.55, when DS was10.0 wt%. There was no obvious difference for RC before 28 days at Rl/s = 0.45 and 0.55 when DS was 15.0 wt%. Due to the hydration-produced gelling material such as Ca(OH)2, calcium silicate hydrate (C-S-H, clavate), and calcium aluminate hydrate (C-A-H, microcrystalline gel), which wrapped the surplus sludge, in this work, Portland cement was the main cementitious materials to form the strength of solidified blocks. Additionally, when solidified blocks were cured at room temperature, a portion of the Ca(OH)2 gel that was present in the hydrated cement slurry may react with CO2 in the atmosphere and change into CaCO3, and XRD diffraction spectra revealed the presence of CaCO3 (seen in Figure 5). As a result, as DS increased, RC decreased, and as the curing time was extended, RC increased. The Portland cement dosage was thus decreased as DS increased due to the fact that the amount of gel material decreases and hydration was diminished as DS increased. It was challenging to obtain saturation with the Ca(OH)2, calcium silicate hydrate (C-S-H) and hydrated cement slurry to prevent the formation of stable crystal or insoluble when the water concentration was too high. Therefore, the RC reduced with Rl/s increasing.

3.3. The Effect of Na2SiO3 on RC of Solidified Blocks

It was reported that sodium silicate (Na2SiO3) is one of the common alkali activators of geopolymers with better mechanical properties and durability [35]. So, how sodium silicate affected the unconfined compression strength (RC) of solidified blocks was examined. First, the effect of the molar ratio (M) of SiO2 to Na2O in sodium silicate on the RC of the solidified blocks was investigated, as shown in Figure 7. Results indicated that adding Na2SiO3 hastened the curing process and the RC of 28 days gradually approached the equilibrium value. Furthermore, the RC of 60 days increased initially and then reduced with M increasing from 1.00 to 2.43. RC of 60 days reached the maximum value of 28.00 MPa when M was 1.70, DS was 5.0 wt%, and Rl/s was 0.45. Compared with DS5 (Rl/s = 0.45, 17.80 MPa) without Na2SiO3, RC of 60 days was 25.90 MPa, 27.10 MPa, 28.00 MPa, 24.05 MPa, and 23.10 MPa, raising by 45.51%, 52.25%, 57.30%, 35.11%, and 29.78%; in turn, when M was 1.00, 1.35, 1.70, 2.05, and 2.43. The results are similar to those mentioned previously in the literature report, that is, when the modulus value and dosage of sodium silicate were under appropriate conditions, the strength increased [35,41]. The addition of Na2SiO3 was therefore advantageous for improving RC.
The effect of DNa2SiO3 on RC was also investigated when DS was 5.0 wt%, Rl/s was 0.45, and M was 2.43, as shown in Figure 8. The RC of 28 days steadily approached the equilibrium value because the addition of Na2SiO3 could speed up the curing process, which was consistent with Figure 7. With DNa2SiO3 increasing from 0.0 wt% to 9.0 wt%, RC of 28 and 60 days increased initially and then reduced. Generally, RC was better than the RC of sample DS5 (Rl/s = 0.45) and RC was improved. The possible explanations are as follows: (1) the Na2SiO3 could increase the proportion of C-S-H during the cement slurry curing process; and (2) in the aqueous solution, Na2SiO3 hydrolysis would produce some spherical SiO2 particles, as shown in Figure 5, improving the strength of solidified blocks. With DNa2SiO3 increasing from 0.0 wt% to 7.5 wt%, the RC of 60 days increased from 17.80 MPa to 34.70 MPa, an increase of 94.94%. RC of 60 days reduced from 34.70 MPa to 23.95 MPa with DNa2SiO3 increasing from 7.5 wt% to 9.0 wt%, which was increased by 34.55% all the same compared with the RC of DS5 (Rl/s = 0.45). At DNa2SiO3 = 7.5 wt%, RC of 60 days reached the highest value of 34.70 MPa, which was approached RC (35.95 MPa) for the B3S0 sample (see Figure S1 in the Supporting information) without surplus sludge. When DNa2SiO3was 9.0 wt%, the degree of growth on RC of 60 days was lower. It may be the acceleration in hydration reaction caused by the increase in alkalinity, resulting in Ca(OH)2 and calcium silicate hydrate (C-S-H) being produced in the hydration reaction process, failing to fill pores in time.
When DS reached 5.0 wt%, the RC over 30.29 MPa was sufficient from a mechanical strength perspective for comprehensive utilization of the surplus sludge as a building material. While the amount of surplus sludge utilized was less for higher mechanical strength.

3.4. The Effect of Fly Ash on RC of Solidified Blocks

As known, fly ash, usually produced in the coal burning process, could improve the performance of Portland cement [35]. Therefore, to investigate the effect of fly ash on the unconfined compression strength (RC) of solidified blocks, fly ash was added to the solidifying process. Figure 9 shows the effect of fly ash dosage (WF) on RC at room temperature cured for 60 days when Rl/s was 0.45 and Ds was 5.0 wt%. The results show that RC of 60 days increased initially and then reduced with WF increasing from 0.0 wt% to 25.0 wt%. When WF was 10.0 wt%, RC of 60 days reached the highest value of 34.35 MPa. From 0.0 wt% to 10.0 wt% of WF, RC increased to 34.35 MPa from 17.80 MPa, increasing overall by 92.98%. While WF increased from 10.0 wt% to 25.0 wt%, RC reduced to 20.30 MPa from 34.35 MPa, thereby demonstrating a rise of 14.04% in comparison with the sample of WF = 0.0 wt% (DS5, 17.80 MPa). It indicated that adding fly ash might increase the solidified body made of sludge and cement’s mechanical strength, with 10.0 wt% of fly ash being the ideal amount. According to Table 1, the fly ash had higher concentrations of SiO2, Al2O3, Fe2O3, and CaO, which led to the production of more calcium silicate hydrates (C-S-H), calcium aluminate hydrates (C-A-H), and ettringite being produced [36,37], which were used to continuously fill the fly ash’s honeycomb pores during the cement curing process. As a result, during the cement’s hydration and hardening processes, a dense solid was generated. Moreover, clavate (C-S-H) and fragmental structures (C-A-H) were observed in Figure 4j–l.
In addition, when Rl/s was 0.35, the RC of 60 days was 23.75 MPa and only 2.50 MPa when DS was 5.0 wt% and 15.0 wt%, respectively. The utilization of sludge dosage (DS) was still lower for solidified blocks with relatively higher mechanical properties (>20 MPa). The Na2SiO3 and fly ash have the potential to improve the mechanical strength of sludge–cement based solidified blocks. Hence, the effect of Na2SiO3 and fly ash on the RC of sludge–cement based solidified bodies with different DS was investigated according to the Table 3 to improve the mechanical strength of sludge–cement-based solidified blocks with higher DS. The result is shown in Figure 10. RC reduced with an increase in DS, such that the RC of 28 days was 40.69 MPa, 32.60 MPa, and 26.70 MPa when DS was 5.0 wt%, 10.0 wt%, and 15.0 wt%, raising by 94.97%, about 13 times and about 10 times, respectively, compared with the RC of 28 days of sludge–cement based solidified blocks without Na2SiO3 and fly ash. At this ratio, the utilization of sludge dosage (DS = 15.0 wt%) with higher mechanical strength (>20 MPa) was increased by double compared with DS = 5.0 wt% (Rl/s = 0.35).

3.5. The Effect of Freeze-Thaw Cycling on the RC of Solidified Blocks

The effect of temperature (T) on RC was also investigated through the freeze-thaw recycle experiment shown in Figure 11. The mass loss of solidified blocks could reflect the degree of damage to solidified blocks. The results show that the mass of solidified blocks increased initially and then reduced with the increase in the number of freeze-thaw cycles, which is consistent with literature reports [42]. After a total of 50 freeze-thaw cycles, the mass reduced by 3.4%, 4.1%, and 4.9% when DS was 5.0 wt%, 10.0 wt%, and 15.0 wt%, respectively, indicating that the mass loss rate increased with DS increasing. In the early stage of the freeze-thaw cycling experiment, the phenomenon of an increase in the mass of solidified blocks with the increase in the number of freeze-thaw cycles was caused by the formation of new pores in the solidified blocks, leading to a large amount of water migrating inside. When the number of freeze-thaw cycles increased to a certain value, the pore water in the solidified blocks gradually accumulated due to volume expansion in the freezing process. Slowly, cracks developed internally within the solidified blocks and were squeezed, making it difficult for water to enter the inside, and the water sublimated or volatilized more and more, resulting in an increased mass loss.
The freeze-thaw cycling experiment was carried out to investigate the effect of temperature (T) on unconfined compression strength (RC). Figure 12 shows the effect of the number of freeze-thaw cycles on the RC of sludge–cement based solidified blocks with different DS when the Rl/s was 0.35, DNa2SiO3 was 7.5 wt%, and WF was 20.0 wt%. The results show that RC decreased linearly with DS and increased with the number of freeze-thaw cycles, reducing by 25.6%, 32.3%, and 40.6% after a total of 50 freeze-thaw cycles for DS of 5.0 wt%, 10.0 wt%, and 15.0 wt%, respectively. Lower temperatures (below 0 °C) would cause the liquid water in the solidified blocks to change into the solid phase, resulting in an expansion in the volume. Figure 13 depicts this expansion in volume. The pores were produced as the solid water liquified to the liquid phase. Transverse expansion and vertical contraction would take place on the surface of solidified blocks when a vertical force is applied to them. The pores would connect throughout the freeze-thaw recycle operations, in turn, resulting in fissures inside the solidified blocks. The transverse crack was closed when the solidified block was subjected to vertical pressure, however, the more vertical cracks were produced as the fracture stress increased, resulting in a sizable reduction in RC. The crack-changing mechanism has been depicted in Figure 14.
Figure 14 shows the SEM photographs of solidified blocks with a DS of 15.0 wt% and a 10–50 freeze-thaw cycle. Figure 14b,d,f are the enlarged images of Figure 14a,c,e, respectively. Figure 14a,b show that the cracks were produced in the solidified blocks after 10 freeze-thaw cycles. Figure 14c,d show that the surface of the solidified block becomes rough, the crack becomes wide and some particles are shed from the surface of the solidified block. While Figure 14e,f demonstrate how the crack collapsed and the solidified block became loose. There were, thus, more pores were produced. All of the aforementioned findings show how the crack eventually collapses, diminishing unconfined compression strength (RC) with the increase in the number of freeze-thaw cycles.

4. Conclusions

Using regular Portland cement, surplus sludge from sewage treatment plants was solidified to investigate the potential for application in construction materials from the standpoint of mechanical properties. The effects of Rl/S, surplus sludge dosage (DS), curing time (Time), dosage of sodium silicate (DNa2SiO3), and fly ash (WF) on the unconfined compression strength (RC) of cement–surplus sludge solidified blocks were investigated. The FTIR spectra of cement–surplus sludge solidified blocks indicated that the surplus sludge was solidified by cement, and the photographs of solidified blocks show that solidified blocks hardly shrank or dilated in volume. The RC reached the equilibrium value at about 60 days for cement–surplus sludge solidified blocks. RC reduced with Rl/s increasing at the given DS and was reduced with DS increasing from 0.0 wt% to 15.0 wt% at Rl/s of 0.35~0.55. The addition of Na2SiO3 and fly ash could improve the RC of the solidified blocks. RC increased initially and then reduced with DNa2SiO3 increasing from 0.0 wt% to 9.0 wt% at Rl/s = 0.45 when DS was 5.0 wt% and M = 2.43. The RC of 60 days reached the highest value of 34.70 MPa when DNa2SiO3 was 7.5 wt%. RC increased initially and then reduced, with WF increasing to 25.0 wt% from 0.0 wt%. When WF was 15.0 wt%, the RC of 60 days reached the highest value of 34.35 MPa, rising by 93.8% when WF was 10.0 wt%. At the ratio of DNa2SiO3 of 7.50 wt%, Rl/S of 0.35, WF of 20.0 wt%, DS of 15.0 wt%, and M of 1.00, RC reached 26.70 MPa, increasing by about 10 times in comparison with that of sludge–cement based solidified blocks without Na2SiO3 and fly ash. At this ratio, the utilization of sludge utilized (DS = 15.0 wt%) was increased by twice compared with DS = 5.0 wt%. Through a freeze-thaw cycling experiment, the impact of environmental temperature on the mechanical characteristics of the solidified block was also investigated. For solidified blocks with DS of 5.0 wt%, 10.0 wt%, and 15.0 wt%, respectively, the RC and mass were reduced with the freeze-thaw cycle number increasing from 10 to 50 cycles. According to this study, surplus sludge has the desired mechanical properties to be used as a building material. It provides an important theoretical foundation for the efficient disposal and comprehensive utilization of surplus sludge through solidification/stabilization technology using ordinary Portland cement.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/pr10112234/s1, Figure S1: The effect of sodium silicate and fly ash on the RC at room temperature when the Rl/s was 0.45.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.L. and H.H.; methodology, H.H. and J.W.; software, T.H.; validation, L.W.; formal analysis, W.W.; investigation, H.M.; resources, L.Z. and Y.Z.; data curation, J.L.; writing—original draft preparation, J.L.; writing—review and editing, J.L.; visualization, J.W.; supervision, J.H.; project administration, L.Z.; funding acquisition, J.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by China College Students Innovation and Entrepreneurship Fund [No. 202110148018] and Talent Scientific Research Fund of Liaoning Petrochemical University [No. 2016xJJ-031]. And the APC was funded by J. Liang.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare they have no known conflict of interest or personal relationships influencing the work reported in this paper.

References

  1. Liew, C.S.; Yunus, N.M.; Chidi, B.S.; Lam, M.K.; Goh, P.S.; Mohamad, M.; Sin, J.C.; Lam, S.M.; Lim, J.W.; Lam, S.S. A review on recent disposal of hazardous sewage sludge via anaerobic digestion and novel composting. J. Hazard. Mater. 2022, 423, 126995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Liew, C.S.; Kiatkittipong, W.; Lim, J.W.; Lam, M.K.; Ho, Y.C.; Ho, C.D.; Ntwampe, S.K.O.; Mohamad, M.; Usman, A. Stabilization of heavy metals loaded sewage sludge: Reviewing conventional to state-of-the-art thermal treatments in achieving energy sustainability. Chemosphere 2021, 277, 130310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Wei, L.; Zhu, F.; Li, Q.; Xue, C.; Xia, X.; Yu, H.; Zhao, Q.; Jiang, J.; Bai, S. Development, current state and future trends of sludge management in China: Based on exploratory data and CO2-equivaient emissions analysis. Environ. Int. 2020, 144, 106093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Liu, X.; Zhai, Y.; Li, S.; Wang, B.; Wang, T.; Liu, Y.; Qiu, Z.; Li, C. Hydrothermal carbonization of sewage sludge: Effect of feed-water pH on hydrochar’s physicochemical properties, organic component and thermal behavior. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 388, 122084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Sun, Y.; Chen, Z.; Wu, G.; Wu, Q.; Zhang, F.; Niu, Z.; Hu, H.Y. Characteristics of water quality of municipal wastewater treatment plants in China: Implications for resources utilization and management. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 131, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Wang, T.; Shi, F.; Zhang, Q.; Qian, X.; Hashimoto, S. Exploring material stock efficiency of municipal water and sewage infrastructures in China. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 181, 498–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Zhang, Q.H.; Yang, W.N.; Ngo, H.H.; Guo, W.S.; Jin, P.K.; Dzakpasu, M.; Yang, S.J.; Wang, Q.; Wang, X.C.; Ao, D. Current status of urban wastewater treatment plants in China. Environ. Int. 2016, 92–93, 11–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Dong, B.; Liu, X.; Dai, L.; Dai, X. Changes of heavy metal speciation during high-solid anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge. Bioresour. Technol. 2013, 131, 152–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Breulmann, M.; van Afferden, M.; Müller, R.A.; Schulz, E.; Fühner, C. Process conditions of pyrolysis and hydrothermal carbonization affect the potential of sewage sludge for soil carbon sequestration and amelioration. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 2017, 124, 256–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Al-Gheethi, A.A.; Efaq, A.N.; Bala, J.D.; Norli, I.; Abdel-Monem, M.O.; Kadir, M.O.A. Removal of pathogenic bacteria from sewage-treated effluent and biosolids for agricultural purposes. Appl. Water Sci. 2018, 8, 74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Yang, G.; Zhang, G.; Wang, H. Current state of sludge production, management, treatment and disposal in China. Water Res. 2015, 78, 60–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Anders, A.; Weigand, H.; Cakir, H.; Kornhaas, U.; Platen, H. Phosphorus recycling from activated sludge of full-scale wastewater treatment plants by fast inversion of the biological phosphorus elimination mechanism. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 106403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Shehu, M.S.; Abdul Manan, Z.; Alwi, S.R. Optimization of thermo-alkaline disintegration of sewage sludge for enhanced biogas yield. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 114, 69–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Zhang, G.; Yang, J.; Liu, H.; Zhang, J. Sludge ozonation: Disintegration, supernatant changes and mechanisms. Bioresour. Technol. 2009, 100, 1505–1509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Fijalkowski, K.; Rorat, A.; Grobelak, A.; Kacprzak, M.J. The presence of contaminations in sewage sludge-the current situation. J. Environ. Manag. 2017, 203, 1126–1136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Peng, C.; Zhai, Y.; Zhu, Y.; Xu, B.; Wang, T.; Li, C.; Zeng, G. Production of char from sewage sludge employing hydrothermal carbonization: Char properties, combustion behavior and thermal characteristics. Fuel 2016, 176, 110–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Suarez-Iglesias, O.; Urrea, J.L.; Oulego, P.; Collado, S.; Diaz, M. Valuable compounds from sewage sludge by thermal hydrolysis and wet oxidation-A review. Sci. Total Environ. 2017, 584–585, 921–934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wang, T.; Zhai, Y.; Zhu, Y.; Li, C.; Zeng, G. A review of the hydrothermal carbonization of biomass waste for hydrochar formation: Process conditions, fundamentals, and physicochemical properties. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2018, 90, 223–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wei, L.; Li, J.; Xue, M.; Wang, S.; Li, Q.; Qin, K.; Jiang, J.; Ding, J.; Zhao, Q. Adsorption behaviors of Cu2+, Zn2+ and Cd2+ onto proteins, humic acid, and polysaccharides extracted from sludge EPS: Sorption properties and mechanisms. Bioresour. Technol. 2019, 291, 121868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hii, K.; Baroutian, S.; Parthasarathy, R.; Gapes, D.J.; Eshtiaghi, N. A review of wet air oxidation and thermal hydrolysis technologies in sludge treatment. Bioresour. Technol. 2014, 155, 289–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Manara, P.; Zabaniotou, A. Towards sewage sludge based biofuels via thermochemical conversion—A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2012, 16, 2566–2582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Werle, S.; Wilk, R.K. A review of methods for the thermal utilization of sewage sludge: The polish perspective. Renew. Energy 2010, 35, 1914–1919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Anjum, M.; Al-Makishah, N.H.; Barakat, M.A. Wastewater sludge stabilization using pre-treatment methods. Process Saf. Environ. 2016, 102, 615–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Appels, L.; Baeyens, J.; Degrève, J.; Dewil, R. Principles and potential of the anaerobic digestion of waste-activated sludge. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 2008, 34, 755–781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Wei, L.; Qin, K.; Ding, J.; Xue, M.; Yang, C.; Jiang, J.; Zhao, Q. Optimization of the co-digestion of sewage sludge, maize straw and cow manure: Microbial responses and effect of fractional organic characteristics. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 2374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Yang, D.; Hu, C.; Dai, L.; Liu, Z.; Dong, B.; Dai, X. Post-thermal hydrolysis and centrate recirculation for enhancing anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge. Waste Manag. 2019, 92, 39–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zhao, X.; Kumar, K.; Gross, M.A.; Kunetz, T.E.; Wen, Z. Evaluation of revolving algae biofilm reactors for nutrients and metals removal from sludge thickening supernatant in a municipal wastewater treatment facility. Water Res. 2018, 143, 467–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wang, Y.; Zhou, Y.T.; Feng, D.; Wu, C.L.; Wang, X.; Min, F.L. Effect of chemical conditioners on deep dewatering of urban dewatered sewage sludge in the temporary sludge lagoon. J. Environ. Eng. 2019, 145, 04019063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wei, L.; Xia, X.; Zhu, F.; Li, Q.; Xue, M.; Li, J.; Sun, B.; Jiang, J.; Zhao, Q. Dewatering efficiency of sewage sludge during Fe2+-activated persulfate oxidation: Effect of hydrophobic/hydrophilic properties of sludge EPS. Water Res. 2020, 181, 115903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ge, S.; Foong, S.Y.; Ma, N.L.; Liew, R.K.; Mahari, W.A.W.; Xia, C.; Yek, P.N.Y.; Peng, W.; Nam, W.L.; Lim, X.Y.; et al. Vacuum pyrolysis incorporating microwave heating and base mixture modification: An integrated approach to transform biowaste into eco-friendly bioenergy products. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2020, 127, 109871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Xu, Z.; Ye, D.; Dai, T.; Dai, Y. Research on preparation of coal waste-based geopolymer and its stabilization/solidification of heavy metals. Integr. Ferroelectr. 2021, 217, 214–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Shen, Z.; Jin, F.; O’Connor, D.; Hou, D. Solidification/stabilization for soil remediation: An old technology with new vitality. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2019, 53, 11615–11617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Tuncan, A.; Tuncan, M.; Koyuncu, H. Use of petroleum-contaminated drilling wastes as sub-base material for road construction. Waste Manag. Res. 2000, 18, 489–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Ministry of Construction of the People’s Republic of China. Determination Method for Municipal Sludge in Wastewater Treatment Plant; Ministry of Construction of the People’s Republic of China: Beijing, China, 2005. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  35. Lv, Q.; Yu, J.; Ji, F.; Gu, L.; Chen, Y.; Shan, X. Mechanical property and microstructure of fly ash-based geopolymer activated by sodium silicate. KSCE J. Civ. Eng. 2021, 25, 1765–1777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Kowalski, M.; Kowalska, K.; Wiszniowski, J.; Turek-Szytow, J. Qualitative analysis of activated sludge using FT-IR technique. Chem. Pap. 2018, 72, 2699–2706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Ma, J.; Li, P.; Wang, W.; Wang, S.; Pan, X.; Zhang, F.; Li, S.; Liu, S.; Wang, H.; Gao, G.; et al. Biodegradable poly (amino acid)-gold-magnetic complex with efficient endocytosis for multimodal imaging-guided chemo-photothermal therapy. ACS Nano 2018, 12, 9022–9032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Barbosa, V.F.F.; MacKenzie, K.J.D.; Thaumaturgo, C. Synthesis and characterisation of materials based on inorganic polymers of alumina and silica: Sodium polysialate polymers. Int. J. Inorg. Mater. 2000, 2, 309–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Yakubu, Y.; Zhou, J.; Ping, D.; Shu, Z.; Chen, Y. Effects of pH dynamics on solidification/stabilization of municipal solid waste incineration fly ash. J. Environ. Manag. 2018, 207, 243–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Li, J.T.; Zeng, M.; Ji, W.X. Characteristics of the cement-solidified municipal solid waste incineration fly ash. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2018, 25, 36736–36744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Hou, Y.F.; Wang, D.M.; Li, Q.; Lu, H.B. Effect of water glass performance on fly ash-based geopolymers. J. Chin. Ceram. Soc. 2008, 36, 61–64. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Li, J.L.; Zhu, L.Y.; Zhou, K.P.; Liu, H.W.; Cao, S.P. Damage characteristics of sandstone pore structure under freeze-thaw cycles. Rock Soil Mech. 2019, 40, 3524–3532. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Freeze-thaw cycle temperature diagram.
Figure 1. Freeze-thaw cycle temperature diagram.
Processes 10 02234 g001
Figure 2. The photos of the solidified blocks at Rl/s = 0.45. (ad) are DS0, DS5, DS10, and DS15; (eh) are B3S0, B4.5, B7.5, and B9 samples; (il) are F15S0, F5.0, F10.0, and F15.0.
Figure 2. The photos of the solidified blocks at Rl/s = 0.45. (ad) are DS0, DS5, DS10, and DS15; (eh) are B3S0, B4.5, B7.5, and B9 samples; (il) are F15S0, F5.0, F10.0, and F15.0.
Processes 10 02234 g002
Figure 3. (a) is FTIR spectra of the ash residuum of surplus sludge and raw materials; (b) is FTIR spectra of solidified blocks.
Figure 3. (a) is FTIR spectra of the ash residuum of surplus sludge and raw materials; (b) is FTIR spectra of solidified blocks.
Processes 10 02234 g003
Figure 4. SEM photographs of raw materials and solidified blocks curing for 60 days. (a) dry surplus sludge, (b) DS0 sample (Rl/s = 0.45), (c) fly ash, (d) DS5 (Rl/s = 0.45), (e) B3S0, (fh) are B4.5, B7.5, and B9.0 samples, respectively, (il) are F15S0, F5.0, F10.0, and F15.0 samples, respectively.
Figure 4. SEM photographs of raw materials and solidified blocks curing for 60 days. (a) dry surplus sludge, (b) DS0 sample (Rl/s = 0.45), (c) fly ash, (d) DS5 (Rl/s = 0.45), (e) B3S0, (fh) are B4.5, B7.5, and B9.0 samples, respectively, (il) are F15S0, F5.0, F10.0, and F15.0 samples, respectively.
Processes 10 02234 g004
Figure 5. XRD pattern of cement–surplus sludge solidified blocks.
Figure 5. XRD pattern of cement–surplus sludge solidified blocks.
Processes 10 02234 g005
Figure 6. The effects of DS and Rl/s on RC of solidified blocks at room temperature. (a) is the RC of blank samples of Portland cement solidified blocks. (bd) are the RC of cement–surplus sludge solidified blocks with different DS.
Figure 6. The effects of DS and Rl/s on RC of solidified blocks at room temperature. (a) is the RC of blank samples of Portland cement solidified blocks. (bd) are the RC of cement–surplus sludge solidified blocks with different DS.
Processes 10 02234 g006
Figure 7. The effect of modulus of sodium silicate on RC of 28 days for solidified blocks solidified at room temperature at the Rl/s = 0.45, DNa2SiO3 = 9.0 wt% and DS = 5.0 wt%.
Figure 7. The effect of modulus of sodium silicate on RC of 28 days for solidified blocks solidified at room temperature at the Rl/s = 0.45, DNa2SiO3 = 9.0 wt% and DS = 5.0 wt%.
Processes 10 02234 g007
Figure 8. The effect of DNa2SiO3 on RC of solidified blocks at room temperature when Rl/s was 0.45, DS was 5.0 wt%, and M was 2.43.
Figure 8. The effect of DNa2SiO3 on RC of solidified blocks at room temperature when Rl/s was 0.45, DS was 5.0 wt%, and M was 2.43.
Processes 10 02234 g008
Figure 9. The effect of WF on RC of solidified blocks at room temperature cured for 60 days when the Rl/s was 0.45 and the Ds was 5 wt%.
Figure 9. The effect of WF on RC of solidified blocks at room temperature cured for 60 days when the Rl/s was 0.45 and the Ds was 5 wt%.
Processes 10 02234 g009
Figure 10. The effect of Na2SiO3 (M = 1.00) and fly ash on the RC of sludge–cement–based solidified blocks with different DS at room temperature cured for 28 days when the Rl/s was 0.35.
Figure 10. The effect of Na2SiO3 (M = 1.00) and fly ash on the RC of sludge–cement–based solidified blocks with different DS at room temperature cured for 28 days when the Rl/s was 0.35.
Processes 10 02234 g010
Figure 11. The effect of freeze-thaw cycling number on mass of sludge–cement-based solidified blocks with different DS when Rl/s was 0.35, DNa2SiO3 was 7.5%, and WF was 20.0 wt%.
Figure 11. The effect of freeze-thaw cycling number on mass of sludge–cement-based solidified blocks with different DS when Rl/s was 0.35, DNa2SiO3 was 7.5%, and WF was 20.0 wt%.
Processes 10 02234 g011
Figure 12. The effect of the number of freeze-thaw cycles on RC of sludge–cement-based solidified blocks with different DS when Rl/s was 0.35, DNa2SiO3 was 7.5%, and WF was 20 wt%.
Figure 12. The effect of the number of freeze-thaw cycles on RC of sludge–cement-based solidified blocks with different DS when Rl/s was 0.35, DNa2SiO3 was 7.5%, and WF was 20 wt%.
Processes 10 02234 g012
Figure 13. Deterioration diagram after freeze-thaw cycles of 0–50 when DS was 15.0 wt%, (a) 0 freeze-thaw cycle; (b) 10 freeze-thaw cycles; (c) 20 freeze-thaw cycles; (d) 30–50 freeze-thaw cycles.
Figure 13. Deterioration diagram after freeze-thaw cycles of 0–50 when DS was 15.0 wt%, (a) 0 freeze-thaw cycle; (b) 10 freeze-thaw cycles; (c) 20 freeze-thaw cycles; (d) 30–50 freeze-thaw cycles.
Processes 10 02234 g013
Figure 14. SEM photographs of solidified blocks with DS = 15%. Number of freeze-thaw cycles of: (a,b) were 10 cycles; (c,d) were 30 cycles; (e,f) were 50 cycles. Photographs (b,d,f) are the enlarge the pictures of (a,c,e) respectively.
Figure 14. SEM photographs of solidified blocks with DS = 15%. Number of freeze-thaw cycles of: (a,b) were 10 cycles; (c,d) were 30 cycles; (e,f) were 50 cycles. Photographs (b,d,f) are the enlarge the pictures of (a,c,e) respectively.
Processes 10 02234 g014
Table 1. Ingredient of fly ash supplied by corresponding companies.
Table 1. Ingredient of fly ash supplied by corresponding companies.
Chemical CompositionWeight (wt%)Chemical CompositionWeight (wt%)
SiO253.97MgO1.01
Al2O331.15Na2O0.89
Fe2O34.16SO30.73
CaO4.01P2O50.67
K2O2.04Cl0.13
TiO21.13NiO0.11
Table 2. Experiment scheme of cement solidified residual sludge.
Table 2. Experiment scheme of cement solidified residual sludge.
Solidified BlockDS/wt%DP/wt%Rl/sDNa2SiO3/wt%MWF/wt%
DS00.0100.00.35
0.45
0.55
0.0-0.0
DS55.095.00.35
0.45
0.55
0.0-0.0
DS1010.090.00.35
0.45
0.55
0.0-0.0
DS1515.085.00.35
0.45
0.55
0.0-0.0
B3S00.0100.00.453.02.430.0
B3.0
B4.5
B6.0
B7.5
B9.0
5.095.00.453.0
4.5
6.0
7.5
9.0
2.430.0
F5.0
F10.0
F15.0
F20.0
F25.0
5.090.0
85.0
80.0
75.0
70.0
0.45--5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
25.0
F15S00.085.00.45--15.0
DP, DS, and DNa2SiO3 were the mass proportion of ordinary Portland cement, surplus sludge, and Na2SiO3 in solid phase, respectively.
Table 3. Freeze-thaw recycle experiment scheme.
Table 3. Freeze-thaw recycle experiment scheme.
SampleDNa2SiO3/wt%DS/wt%DP/wt%MWF/wt%Rl/s
A7.55.075.01.0020.00.35
B7.510.070.01.0020.00.35
C7.515.065.01.0020.00.35
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liang, J.; He, H.; Wei, J.; Han, T.; Wang, W.; Wang, L.; Han, J.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, Y.; Ma, H. Study of Solidifying Surplus Sludge as Building Material Using Ordinary Portland Cement. Processes 2022, 10, 2234. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10112234

AMA Style

Liang J, He H, Wei J, Han T, Wang W, Wang L, Han J, Zhang L, Zhang Y, Ma H. Study of Solidifying Surplus Sludge as Building Material Using Ordinary Portland Cement. Processes. 2022; 10(11):2234. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10112234

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liang, Jiling, Han He, Jianwei Wei, Tingting Han, Wenwu Wang, Lu Wang, Jie Han, Lunqiu Zhang, Yan Zhang, and Haiqiang Ma. 2022. "Study of Solidifying Surplus Sludge as Building Material Using Ordinary Portland Cement" Processes 10, no. 11: 2234. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10112234

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop