# Hedging on Betting Markets

^{1}

^{2}

^{*}

## Abstract

**:**

## 1. Introduction

## 2. Terminology and Previous Results

**Example**

**1.**

**Example**

**2.**

**Lemma**

**1.**

**Proof.**

**Example**

**3.**

**Lemma**

**2.**

**Proof.**

## 3. The General Case

**Example**

**4.**

**Proposition**

**1.**

**Proof.**

**Example**

**5.**

**Example**

**6.**

**Proposition**

**2.**

**Proof.**

## 4. Hedging on a Betting Exchange

**Example**

**7.**

**Lemma**

**3.**

**Proof.**

**Proposition**

**3.**

**Proof.**

**Example**

**8.**

**Proposition**

**4.**

**Proof.**

## 5. Hedging without a Lay Option

**Example**

**9.**

**Proposition**

**5.**

**Proof.**

**Example**

**10.**

**Proposition**

**6.**

**Proof.**

**Proposition**

**7.**

**Proof.**

## 6. Conclusions

## Author Contributions

## Funding

## Acknowledgments

## Conflicts of Interest

## Appendix A

#### Appendix A.1. Proof of Proposition 2

**Proof.**

#### Appendix A.2. Full Derivation of Proposition 3

#### Appendix A.3. Proof of Proposition 6

**Proof.**

#### Appendix A.4. Proof of Proposition 7

**Proof.**

## References

- Agrawal, Shipra, Nimrod Megiddo, and Benjamin Armbruster. 2010. Equilibrium in prediction markets with buyers and sellers. Economics Letters 109: 46–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arrow, Kenneth J., Robert Forsythe, Michael Gorham, Robert Hahn, Robin Hanson, John O. Ledyard, Saul Levmore, Robert Litan, Paul Milgrom, Forrest D. Nelson, and et al. 2008. The promise of prediction markets. Science 320: 877–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Axén, Gustav, and Dominic Cortis. 2019. Extending the price constraints of betting markets. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance 23: 181–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Berg, Joyce E., Forrest D. Nelson, and Thomas A. Rietz. 2008. Prediction market accuracy in the long run. International Journal of Forecasting 24: 285–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Buhagiar, Ranier, Dominic Cortis, and Philip W. S. Newall. 2018. Why do some soccer bettors lose more money than others? Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance 18: 85–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Cain, Michael, David Law, and David Peel. 2000. The favourite-long shot bias and market efficiency in uk football betting. Scottish Journal of Political Economy 47: 25–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Candila, Vincenzo, and Antonio Scognamillo. 2018. Estimating the implied probabilities in the tennis betting market: A new normalization procedure. International Journal of Sport Finance 13: 225–42. [Google Scholar]
- Chatterjee, Subimal, and Satadruta Mookherjee. 2018. Valuing bets and hedges. Judgment and Decision Making 13: 509. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, Yiling. 2005. Markets as an Information Aggregation Mechanism for Decision Support. Ph.D. thesis, The Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA, USA. [Google Scholar]
- Cortis, Dominic. 2015. Expected values and variances in bookmaker payouts: A theoretical approach towards setting limits on odds. The Journal of Prediction Markets 9: 1–14. [Google Scholar]
- Coulomb, Renaud, and Marc Sangnier. 2014. The impact of political majorities on firm value: Do electoral promises or friendship connections matter? Journal of Public Economics 115: 158–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Dreber, Anna, Thomas Pfeiffer, Johan Almenberg, Siri Isaksson, Brad Wilson, Yiling Chen, Brian A. Nosek, and Magnus Johannesson. 2015. Using prediction markets to estimate the reproducibility of scientific research. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112: 15343–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
- Flepp, Raphael, Stephan Nüesch, and Egon Franck. 2017. The liquidity advantage of the quote-driven market: Evidence from the betting industry. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance 64: 306–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Franck, Egon, Erwin Verbeek, and Stephan Nüesch. 2010. Prediction accuracy of different market structures—Bookmakers versus a betting exchange. International Journal of Forecasting 26: 448–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Frederick, Shane, Amanda Levis, Steven G Malliaris, and Andrew Meyer. 2018. Valuing bets and hedges: Implications for the construct of risk preference. Judgment and Decision Making 13: 501–8. [Google Scholar]
- Kovalchik, Stephanie Ann. 2016. Searching for the goat of tennis win prediction. Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports 12: 127–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Levitt, Steven D. 2004. Why are gambling markets organized so differently from financial markets? Economic Journal 114: 223–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Manski, Charles F. 2006. Interpreting the predictions of prediction markets. Economics Letters 91: 425–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Newall, Philip W. S., and Dominic Cortis. 2019. High-stakes hedges are misunderstood too. A commentary on: “Valuing bets and hedges: Implications for the construct of risk preference”. Judgment and Decision Making 14: 605. [Google Scholar]
- Ottaviani, Marco, and Peter Norman Sørensen. 2005. Parimutuel versus Fixed-Odds Markets. Available online: http://web.econ.ku.dk/sorensen/papers/pvfom.pdf (accessed on 30 June 2020).
- Ottaviani, Marco, and Peter Norman Sørensen. 2009. Surprised by the parimutuel odds? American Economic Review 99: 2129–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peel, David. 2017. Wagering on more than one outcome in an event in cumulative prospect theory and rank dependent utility. Economics Letters 154: 45–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Stark, Dudley, and Dominic Cortis. 2017. Balancing the book: Is it necessary and sufficient? The Journal of Gambling Business and Economics 11: 1–6. [Google Scholar]
- Wolfers, Justin, and Eric Zitzewitz. 2006. Interpreting Prediction Market Prices as Probabilities. Technical Report. Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research. [Google Scholar]

1 | Another possible method is the parimutuel method, where the odds are determined only after people have bet. This is however a different problem as the bettors are unaware of their expected return when placing bets (Ottaviani and Sørensen 2005, 2009). |

2 | We approximately follow the notation of Axén and Cortis (2019) here as the paper studies a similar problem using the same inputs. |

3 | |

4 | We tossed a coin and use the male pronoun throughout the paper. |

5 | See Axén and Cortis (2019) for the full derivation. |

6 | An equivalent result can be derived for Dutching over lay bets, but it is not necessary for our purposes. |

7 | We can also frame this as the problem of buying a cash flow of $1 if i occurs at the price of $\frac{1}{{\alpha}_{i}}$ and then selling a cash flow of $1 if i occurs at the price of $\frac{1}{{\beta}_{i}^{\prime}}$, which yields the return of investment as $(\mathrm{Price}\phantom{\rule{4.pt}{0ex}}\mathrm{sold})/(\mathrm{Price}\phantom{\rule{4.pt}{0ex}}\mathrm{bought})-1={\alpha}_{i}/{\beta}_{i}^{\prime}-1$. |

© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

## Share and Cite

**MDPI and ACS Style**

Axén, G.; Cortis, D.
Hedging on Betting Markets. *Risks* **2020**, *8*, 88.
https://doi.org/10.3390/risks8030088

**AMA Style**

Axén G, Cortis D.
Hedging on Betting Markets. *Risks*. 2020; 8(3):88.
https://doi.org/10.3390/risks8030088

**Chicago/Turabian Style**

Axén, Gustav, and Dominic Cortis.
2020. "Hedging on Betting Markets" *Risks* 8, no. 3: 88.
https://doi.org/10.3390/risks8030088