Next Article in Journal
Comparing the Effectiveness of Machine Learning and Deep Learning Models in Student Credit Scoring: A Case Study in Vietnam
Previous Article in Journal
Breaking Barriers: Gender Diversity, ESG, and Corporate Misconduct in the GCC Region
Previous Article in Special Issue
Credit Risk Prediction Using Machine Learning and Deep Learning: A Study on Credit Card Customers
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Historical Perspectives in Volatility Forecasting Methods with Machine Learning

1
Seaver College, Pepperdine University, Malibu, CA 90263, USA
2
Pepperdine Graziadio Business School, Pepperdine University, Malibu, CA 90263, USA
3
Institute of Advanced Machinery, Design & Technology, Korea University, Seoul 136-713, Republic of Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Risks 2025, 13(5), 98; https://doi.org/10.3390/risks13050098
Submission received: 10 April 2025 / Revised: 14 May 2025 / Accepted: 16 May 2025 / Published: 20 May 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Volatility Modeling in Financial Market)

Abstract

Volatility forecasting for financial institutions plays a pivotal role across a wide range of domains, such as risk management, option pricing, and market making. For instance, banks can incorporate volatility forecasts into stress testing frameworks to ensure they are holding sufficient capital during extreme market conditions. However, volatility forecasting is challenging because volatility can only be estimated, and different factors influence volatility, ranging from macroeconomic indicators to investor sentiments. While recent works show promising advances in machine learning and artificial intelligence for volatility forecasting, a comprehensive assessment of current statistical and learning-based methods is lacking. Thus, this paper aims to provide a comprehensive survey of the historical evolution of volatility forecasting with a comparative benchmark of key landmark models, such as implied volatility, GARCH, LSTM, and Transformer. We open-source our benchmark code to further research in learning-based methods for volatility forecasting.
Keywords: volatility forecasting; risk management; deep learning; time series analysis; GARCH; LSTM; transformer volatility forecasting; risk management; deep learning; time series analysis; GARCH; LSTM; transformer

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Qiu, Z.; Kownatzki, C.; Scalzo, F.; Cha, E.S. Historical Perspectives in Volatility Forecasting Methods with Machine Learning. Risks 2025, 13, 98. https://doi.org/10.3390/risks13050098

AMA Style

Qiu Z, Kownatzki C, Scalzo F, Cha ES. Historical Perspectives in Volatility Forecasting Methods with Machine Learning. Risks. 2025; 13(5):98. https://doi.org/10.3390/risks13050098

Chicago/Turabian Style

Qiu, Zhiang, Clemens Kownatzki, Fabien Scalzo, and Eun Sang Cha. 2025. "Historical Perspectives in Volatility Forecasting Methods with Machine Learning" Risks 13, no. 5: 98. https://doi.org/10.3390/risks13050098

APA Style

Qiu, Z., Kownatzki, C., Scalzo, F., & Cha, E. S. (2025). Historical Perspectives in Volatility Forecasting Methods with Machine Learning. Risks, 13(5), 98. https://doi.org/10.3390/risks13050098

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop