Opportunities for the Application of a Model of Cost Management and Reduction of Risks in Financial and Economic Activity Based on the OLAP Technology: The Case of the Agro-Industrial Sector of Russia
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
2.1. Implementation of Digital Technologies in the Agro-Industrial Sector to Reduce Costs and Risks
2.2. Use of Cloud Technologies and OLAP in Economic, Accounting, and Analytical Activities
2.3. Cost Management Systems
3. Results
4. Methods
4.1. Research Approach
4.2. Empirical Context and Case Selection
4.3. Data Collection
4.4. Data Analysis
5. Discussion
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Astafieva, Valentina A., Tatyana M. Moiseeva, and Elena Vasilyevna Kovalchuk. 2016. Cloud technologies in accounting: Problems, risks, development. Eurasian Scientific Journal 11: 10–19. [Google Scholar]
- Atkinson, Anthony A., Rajiv D. Banker, Robert S. Kaplan, and S. Mark Young. 2019. Management Accounting. Trans. from English. St. Petersburg: Dialectics. [Google Scholar]
- Bakhtin, Pavel, Elena Khabirov, Ilya Kuzminov, and Thomas Thurner. 2020. The future of food production—A text-mining approach. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 32: 516–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bekkalieva, Natalia K. 2019. Effective pricing of cloud technologies in the company’s economic security system. Azimuth Scientific Research: Economics and Management 8: 83–85. [Google Scholar]
- Bensalloua, Charef Abdallah, and Djamila Hamdadou. 2021. Spatial OLAP and multicriteria integrated approach for decision support system: Application in agroforestry management. In Research Anthology on Decision Support Systems and Decision Management in Healthcare, Business, and Engineering. Edited by Management Association, Information Resources. Hershey: IGI Global, pp. 1114–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bimonte, Sandro, Omar Boussaid, Michel Schneider, and Fabien Ruelle. 2021. Design and implementation of active stream data warehouses. In Research Anthology on Decision Support Systems and Decision Management in Healthcare, Business, and Engineering. Edited by Management Association, Information Resources. Hershey: IGI Global, pp. 288–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bo, Zhao, and Xiaojun Ye. 2011. Research and implementation of OLAP performance test method. Journal of Computer Research and Development 48: 1951–59. [Google Scholar]
- Bock, Stefan, and Markus Pütz. 2017. Implementing value engineering based on a multidimensional quality-oriented control calculus within a target costing and target pricing approach. International Journal of Production Economics 183: 146–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bolton, Ruth N., Janet R. McColl-Kennedy, Lilliemay Cheung, Andrew S. Gallan, Chiara Orsingher, Lars Witel, and Mohamed Zaki. 2018. Customer experience challenges: Bringing together digital, physical and social realms. Journal of Service Management 29: 776–808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Boulil, Kamal, Sandro Bimonte, and Francois Pinet. 2014. Spatial OLAP integrity constraints: From UML-based specification to automatic implementation: Application to energetic data in agriculture. Journal of Decision Systems 23: 460–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Braun, Virginia, and Victoria Clarke. 2019. Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health 11: 589–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ciasullo, Maria Vincenza, Raffaella Montera, Francesco Mercuri, and Shame Mugova. 2022. When digitalization meets omnichannel in international markets: A case study from the agri-food industry. Administrative Sciences 12: 68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Codd, Edgar F., Sharon B. Codd, and Clynch T. Salley. 1993. Providing OLAP to User-Analysts: An IT Mandate. Manchester: Hyperion Solutions Corporation. [Google Scholar]
- Cueto, Lavinia Javier, April Faith Deleon Frisnedi, Reynaldo Baculio Collera, Kenneth Ian Talosig Batac, and Casper Boongaling Agaton. 2022. Digital innovations in MSMEs during economic disruptions: Experiences and challenges of young entrepreneurs. Administrative Sciences 12: 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Denzin, Norman K. 1970. The Research Act: A Theoretical Introduction to Sociological Methods. Chicago: Aldine. [Google Scholar]
- Dokholyan, Sergey, Evgeniya O. Ermolaeva, Alexander S. Verkhovod, Elena V. Dupliy, Anna E. Gorokhova, Vyacheslav A. Ivanov, and Vladimir D. Sekerin. 2022. Influence of management automation on managerial decision-making in the agro-industrial complex. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications 13: 597–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dutbayev, Yerlan, Nadira Sultanova, Vladimir Tsygankov, Rafiq Islam, and Nurlan Kuldybayev. 2020. A comparison study of biotic factor’s effect on photosynthesis processes of soybean by using multispeq device on photosynq.org platform. ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences 15: 2627–30. [Google Scholar]
- El-Jawhari, Bashar, Harikrishna Mahadevan, and Omar Soub. 2020. Rethinking Cost to Drive Value for Your Organization. White Paper Series. vol. 1. PwC. Available online: https://www.pwc.com/m1/en/services/consulting/documents/rethinking-cost-drive-value-for-your-organisation-vol1.pdf (accessed on 2 September 2022).
- FAO. 2021. World Food and Agriculture–Statistical Yearbook 2021. Rome: FAO. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- FAO. 2022. Food Price Index. Available online: https://www.fao.org/worldfoodsituation/foodpricesindex/en/ (accessed on 2 September 2022).
- Federal Law. 2007. No. 209-FZ. “On the development of small and medium-sized businesses in the Russian Federation”. July 24. Available online: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_52144/ (accessed on 2 September 2022).
- Gamtessa, Samuel. 2022. Capacity utilization, factor substitution, and productivity growth in Canadian food processing sector. Agricultural and Food Economics 10: 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gerasimova, Larisa Nikolaevna, Tatiana Martemyanova Mezentseva, Natalya Nikolaevna Parasotskaya, and Vera Valeryevna Dvoretskaya. 2019. Features of Environmental Cost Management. Amazonia Investiga 8: 609–15. [Google Scholar]
- Gladilina, Irina, Lyudmila Pankova, Svetlana Sergeeva, and Vladimir Kolesnik. 2022. The Effect of Using Information Technologies for Supporting Decision-Making in the Procurement Management of an Industrial Enterprise on Reducing Financial Costs. Indian Journal of Economics and Development 18: 367–73. [Google Scholar]
- Gnezdova, Julia V., Vera T. Grishina, Nadezhda V. Rebrikoya, Svetlana A. Kalugina, and Ibragim A. Ramazanov. 2020. Development of high technologies in industry in the context of globalization: Digital twins. Revista Inclusiones 7: 460–70. [Google Scholar]
- Gushchina, Elena G., and Darja I. Babkina. 2020. Assessment of the condition and instruments of the food security regulation of countries taking into account the inequality of their economic development and instability of the world trade in the conditions of a pandemic. Journal of Volgograd State University. Economics 22: 128–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hansen, Chr. 2021. Five Reasons to Use Cloud Technology in the Dairy Industry. March 2. Available online: https://milknews.ru/spetsproekty/proekty-nashih-partnerov/hansen/hrhansen-chr-hansen_1037.html (accessed on 2 September 2022).
- Janteliyev, Dastan, Tair Julamanov, Bekzat Rsymbetov, Azamat Kaldybekov, and Yulduz Allaberganova. 2022. Increasing the level of management efficiency: Using unmanned aerial vehicles for monitoring pasture lands. Instrumentation Mesure Métrologie 21: 59–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kasanen, Eero, Kari Lukka, and Arto Siitonen. 1993. The constructive approach in management accounting research. Journal of Management Accounting Research 5: 243–64. [Google Scholar]
- Kashkovskii, Vladimir G., Alevtina A. Plakhova, and Dmitry V. Kropachev. 2019. Features of the development of beekeeping in the Narym region of Russia. Advances in Animal and Veterinary Sciences 7: 50–59. [Google Scholar]
- Khoruzhy, Liudmila I. 2004. Problems of Theory, Methodology, Methodology and Organization of Management Accounting in Agriculture. Moscow: Finansy i statistika. [Google Scholar]
- Khoruzhy, Liudmila I., Vladimir M. Bautin, Yuriy N. Katkov, Elena I. Stepanenko, and Boris V. Lukyanov. 2018. Adaptive internal controls system for the accounting and analytics in the agrarian organizations. Espacios 39: 19. [Google Scholar]
- Kosharnaya, Galina B., and Valery P. Kosharny. 2016. Triangulation as a means ensuring validity of empirical study results. University Proceedibgs. Volga Region. Social Sciences. Sociology 2: 117–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kritskaya, Marina. 2022. State Programmes to Support Small Businesses–2022. January 18. Available online: https://kontur.ru/articles/4710 (accessed on 2 September 2022).
- Kyriazis, Nikolaos A. 2022. Optimal Portfolios of National Currencies, Commodities and Fuel, Agricultural Commodities and Cryptocurrencies during the Russian-Ukrainian Conflict. International Journal of Financial Studies 10: 75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Litvinova, Tatiana N. 2022. Risks of Entrepreneurship amid the COVID-19 Crisis. Risks 10: 163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lochan, Sergey A., Tatiana P. Rozanova, Valery V. Bezpalov, and Dmitry V. Fedyunin. 2021. Supply chain management and risk management in an environment of stochastic uncertainty (Retail). Risks 9: 197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maksimova, Tatiana P., Olga A. Zhdanova, and Tatiana G. Bondarenko. 2021. Effect of exogenous factors on transformation processes in the Russian agro-industrial complex. Bioscience Biotechnology Research Communications 14: 1913–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Matarazzo, Michela, Lara Penco, and Giorgia Profumo. 2020. How is digital transformation changing business models and internationalisation in made in Italy SMEs? Sinergie Italian Journal of Management 38: 89–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mironkina, Alina, Sergei Kharitonov, Alexey Kuchumov, and Alexey Belokopytov. 2020. Digital technologies for efficient farming. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 578: 012017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nardin, Dmitry S., and Svetlana A. Nardina. 2021. Management of natural-anthropogenic complexes of rural territories in the context of the post-non-classical type of scientific rationality. Journal of Environmental Management and Tourism 12: 1242–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nartey, Samuel Narh, and Huibrecht Margaretha van der Poll. 2021. Innovative management accounting practices for sustainability of manufacturing small and medium enterprises. Environment, Development and Sustainability 23: 18008–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nasonov, Artur M. 2018. Modern methods for spatial modeling of the development of agriculture. Bulletin of the Moscow State Regional University. Series: Natural Sciences 3: 62–74. [Google Scholar]
- Nekrasov, Aleksey G., and Anna S. Sinitsyna. 2021. Digital conversion of life cycle processes transportation and logistics systems. In Global Challenges of Digital Transformation of Markets. Edited by Elena De la Poza and Sergey E. Barykin. New York: Nova Science Publishers, pp. 67–75. [Google Scholar]
- Official Portal of the Government of the Rostov Region. 2022. Financial Support to Agricultural Producers. Available online: https://www.donland.ru/activity/817/ (accessed on 2 September 2022).
- Ordynskaya, Marina E., Tatyana A. Silina, Lala E. Divina, Irina F. Tausova, and Saida A. Bagova. 2021. Functions of cost management systems in modern organizational management. Universal Journal of Accounting and Finance 9: 498–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Polese, Francesco, Sergio Barile, Francesco Caputo, Luca Carrubbo, and Leonard Waletzky. 2018. Determinants for value cocreation and collaborative paths in complex service systems: A focus on (smart) cities. Service Science 10: 397–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Purcell, Warren, and Thomas Neubauer. 2023. Digital twins in agriculture: A state-of-the-art review. Smart Agricultural Technology 3: 100094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rossato, Chiara, and Paola Castellani. 2020. The contribution of digitalisation to business longevity from a competitiveness perspective. The TQM Journal 32: 617–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rusagro. 2022. ROS AGRO’s Financial Results for 6M. 2022 and Q2 2022. August 8. Available online: https://www.rusagrogroup.ru/fileadmin/files/reports/ru/pdf/_2Q22_RUS_PressRelease_RA.pdf (accessed on 2 September 2022).
- Russo Spena, Tiziana, and Cristina Mele. 2020. Practising innovation in the healthcare ecosystem: The agency of third-party actors. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing 35: 390–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Scuotto, Veronica, Gabriele Santoro, Stefano Bresciani, and Manlio Del Giudice. 2017. Shifting intra-and inter-organizational innovation processes towards digital business: An empirical analysis of SMEs. Creativity and Innovation Management 26: 247–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sebera, Martin. 2012. Selected Chapters on Methodology. Research Methods. Brno: Masaryk University. Available online: https://www.fsps.muni.cz/emuni/data/reader/book-9/04.html (accessed on 2 September 2022).
- Sergeev, Mikhail. 2021. Global Food Prices Are Falling behind Russian Prices. Inflation in Russia Could Exceed 6 per Cent Due to Higher Food Prices. June 6. Available online: https://www.ng.ru/economics/2021-06-06/4_8166_economics.html (accessed on 2 September 2022).
- Silva, Henrique, Tomás Moreno, António Almeida, António Lucas Soares, and Américo Azevedo. 2023. A digital twin platform-based approach to product lifecycle management: Towards a transformer 4.0. In Innovations in Industrial Engineering II. Icieng 2022. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Cham: Springer, pp. 14–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Slepov, Vladimir A., Olga A. Grishina, Mikhail E. Kosov, Mikael E. Khoranyan, and Sergey A. Balandin. 2022. Modelo de dos parámetros de optimización del sistema tributario progresivo y su aplicabilidad [Two-parameter model of optimization of the progressive taxation system and its applicability]. Nexo Revista Científica 35: 412–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Smartconsult. 2022. New Sanctions against Russia: Impact on the Agricultural Machinery Market in 2022. March 22. Available online: https://marketing.rbc.ru/articles/13374/ (accessed on 2 September 2022).
- Socio-Economic Development of the Moscow Region in 2019. n.d. Available online: https://mef.mosreg.ru/download/document/7312051 (accessed on 2 September 2022).
- Socio-Economic Development of the Moscow Region in 2021. n.d. Available online: https://mef.mosreg.ru/download/document/10886569 (accessed on 2 September 2022).
- Stadtherr, Frank, and Marc Wouters. 2021. Extending target costing to include targets for R&D costs and production investments for a modular product portfolio—A case study. International Journal of Production Economics 231: 107871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Syzdykova, Makhpal B., Talant D. Bimakhanov, Valentina V. Fursova, Maria A. Makhambetova, and Zharkynbek O. Abikenov. 2022. Position of higher education system graduates in the labor market: Search for new opportunities. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies 11: 50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tao, Fei, Fangyuan Sui, Ang Liu, Qinglin Qi, Meng Zhang, Boyang Song, Zirong Guo, Stephen C.-Y. Lu, and Andrew Y. C. Nee. 2019. Digital twin-driven product design framework. International Journal of Production Research 57: 3935–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Thanh, Pham Tien, Duong The Duy, and Pham Bao Duong. 2022. Disruptions to agricultural activities, income loss and food insecurity during the COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence from farm households in a developing country. Journal of Agribusiness in Developing and Emerging Economies 12: 531–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tsenina, Ekaterina V., Tamara P. Danko, Vladimir M. Kiselev, Lyubov A. Chaykovskaya, Nikita D. Epstein, Ona Rauskiene, and Vladimir D. Sekerin. 2022. Cluster analysis of the expenditures for environmental and technological innovations in sustainable development policy formation. Journal of Environmental Management and Tourism 13: 63–74. [Google Scholar]
- United Nations. 2008. Achieving Sustainable Development and Promoting Development Cooperation. New York: United Nations Publications. Available online: https://www.un.org/en/ecosoc/docs/pdfs/fina_08-45773.pdf (accessed on 2 September 2022).
- Vaganova, Oksana V., Natalya E. Solovjeva, Ruslan M. Tamov, and Maria A. Panteleeva. 2021. Managing the Russian agro-industrial complex during the pandemic in the context of digitalization. Webology 18: 857–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Voronin, Boris Aleksandrovich. 2008. Razvitiye malogo i srednego predprinimatel’stva v agrarnoy sfere: Nauchno-pravovyye problemy [Development of small and medium-sized businesses in the agricultural sector: Scientific and legal problems]. Agrarnyy vestnik Urala 12: 86–88. [Google Scholar]
- Vyacheslavova, Olga F., Irina E. Parfenyeva, Tatyana A. Lartseva, Tatiana A. Levina, Oxana G. Savostikova, and Vladlena V. Matrosova. 2022. Desarrollo de criterios para la evaluación de personal en la contabilidad de producción de alta tecnología para el desarrollo de tecnología ddigital [Development of criteria for personnel assessment in high-tech production accounting for the development of digital technology]. REICE: Revista Electrónica De Investigación En Ciencias Económicas 10: 140–60. [Google Scholar]
- Wolfert, Sjaak, Lan Ge, Cor Verdouw, and Marc-Jeroen Bogaardt. 2017. Big data in smart farming—A review. Agricultural Systems 153: 69–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yanjun, Tong. 2013. Study on computer audit based on OLAP technology. Journal of Digital Information Management 11: 409–17. [Google Scholar]
- Zielińska-Chmielewska, Anna, Dobrosława Mruk-Tomczak, and Anna Wielicka-Regulska. 2021. Qualitative Research on Solving Difficulties in Maintaining Continuity of Food Supply Chain on the Meat Market during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Energies 14: 5634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zolotar, Svetlana. n.d. A Third of Russians Are Paid Late and 16% Receive Their Wages in an Envelope: Avito Rabota Research. Available online: https://businesstory.ru/treti-rossijan-zaderzhivajut-zarplatu-a-16-poluchajut-ee-v-konverte-issledovanie-avito-rabota/ (accessed on 2 September 2022).
Comparative Characteristics | Target Costing | Kaizen Costing |
---|---|---|
Stage of application | The design process | The production process |
Basic concept | To most precisely determine the target cost price, putting as much effort as possible into the process | To systematically improve the efficiency of production processes |
Approach to the system | Product design using an interactive approach | Continuous improvements to enhance process efficiency |
Methodology and limitations | The target cost price encourages executives to look for new solutions while blocking the use of expensive technology | Allows increasing the efficiency with a slight excess (3–5%) of drifting costs in the process of setting target costs |
Advantages | The process of designing new products is innovative, while remaining within the target cost price | Achieving the cost-effectiveness of the design work on improving the product at all stages of production |
Targeting | Maximum achievement of the target cost price value |
Structural Divisions | Types of Produce | Quarter | Total | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
I | II | III | IV | |||
Division №1 | Meat | 148,000 | 139,874 | 151,120 | 152,478 | 591,472 |
Milk | 75,869 | 69,312 | 78,009 | 73,564 | 296,754 | |
Offspring | 36,894 | 41,569 | 42,587 | 37,985 | 159,035 | |
Byproducts | 15,958 | 13,296 | 14,277 | 16,002 | 59,533 | |
Total | 276,721 | 264,051 | 285,993 | 280,029 | 1,106,794 | |
Division №2 | Meat | 125,986 | 127,001 | 130,987 | 131,952 | 515,926 |
Milk | 81,963 | 80,554 | 78,658 | 79,956 | 321,131 | |
Offspring | 43,985 | 44,589 | 42,633 | 45,058 | 176,265 | |
Byproducts | 21,987 | 20,895 | 19,875 | 22,041 | 84,798 | |
Total | 273,921 | 273,039 | 272,153 | 279,007 | 1,098,120 | |
Division №3 | Meat | 158,432 | 156,698 | 158,600 | 161,987 | 635,717 |
Milk | 69,401 | 68,955 | 68,671 | 67,951 | 274,978 | |
Offspring | 51,784 | 50,632 | 52,493 | 49,978 | 204,887 | |
Byproducts | 11,468 | 12,014 | 11,897 | 12,458 | 47,837 | |
Total | 291,085 | 288,299 | 291,661 | 292,374 | 1,163,419 | |
Division №4 | Meat | 138,945 | 137,697 | 139,500 | 140,573 | 556,715 |
Milk | 88,945 | 88,624 | 90,145 | 91,258 | 358,972 | |
Offspring | 47,963 | 48,559 | 46,985 | 49,541 | 193,048 | |
Byproducts | 13,960 | 13,966 | 14,211 | 13,852 | 55,989 | |
Total | 289,813 | 288,846 | 290,841 | 295,224 | 1,164,724 | |
Total | 1,131,540 | 1,114,235 | 1,140,648 | 1,146,634 | 4,533,057 |
Division №1 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Types of Produce | Quarter I | |||
Estimated Cost Price | Full Cost Price | Truncated Cost Price | Target Cost Price | |
Meat | 140,791 | 148,000 | 121,695 | 139,859 |
Milk | 79,641 | 75,869 | 52,698 | 73,987 |
Offspring | 35,983 | 36,894 | 23,984 | 34,897 |
Byproducts | 14,758 | 15,958 | 11,695 | 14,589 |
Total (I) | 271,173 | 276,721 | 210,072 | 263,332 |
Types of Produce | Quarter II | |||
Estimated Cost Price | Full Cost Price | Truncated Cost Price | Target Cost Price | |
Meat | 141,630 | 139,874 | 116,972 | 137,985 |
Milk | 70,456 | 69,312 | 49,127 | 65,987 |
Offspring | 39,547 | 41,569 | 25,987 | 40,981 |
Byproducts | 12,961 | 13,296 | 11,068 | 12,986 |
Total (II) | 264,594 | 264,051 | 203,154 | 257,939 |
Types of Produce | Quarter III | |||
Estimated Cost Price | Full Cost Price | Truncated Cost Price | Target Cost Price | |
Meat | 150,447 | 151,120 | 123,954 | 150,987 |
Milk | 80,749 | 78,009 | 55,231 | 77,541 |
Offspring | 45,581 | 42,587 | 27,971 | 45,987 |
Byproducts | 15,470 | 14,277 | 12,897 | 14,705 |
Total (III) | 292,247 | 285,993 | 220,053 | 289,220 |
Types of Produce | Quarter IV | |||
Estimated Cost Price | Full Cost Price | Truncated Cost Price | Target Cost Price | |
Meat | 147,830 | 152,478 | 132,789 | 138,994 |
Milk | 75,458 | 73,564 | 51,468 | 70,897 |
Offspring | 36,791 | 37,985 | 26,898 | 34,879 |
Byproducts | 15,479 | 16,002 | 13,240 | 14,783 |
Total (IV) | 275,558 | 280,029 | 224,395 | 259,553 |
Total for the year | 1,103,572 | 1,106,794 | 857,674 | 1,070,044 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Khoruzhy, L.I.; Katkov, Y.N.; Katkova, E.A.; Khoruzhy, V.I.; Dzhikiya, M.K. Opportunities for the Application of a Model of Cost Management and Reduction of Risks in Financial and Economic Activity Based on the OLAP Technology: The Case of the Agro-Industrial Sector of Russia. Risks 2023, 11, 8. https://doi.org/10.3390/risks11010008
Khoruzhy LI, Katkov YN, Katkova EA, Khoruzhy VI, Dzhikiya MK. Opportunities for the Application of a Model of Cost Management and Reduction of Risks in Financial and Economic Activity Based on the OLAP Technology: The Case of the Agro-Industrial Sector of Russia. Risks. 2023; 11(1):8. https://doi.org/10.3390/risks11010008
Chicago/Turabian StyleKhoruzhy, Liudmila I., Yuriy N. Katkov, Ekaterina A. Katkova, Valeriy I. Khoruzhy, and Meri K. Dzhikiya. 2023. "Opportunities for the Application of a Model of Cost Management and Reduction of Risks in Financial and Economic Activity Based on the OLAP Technology: The Case of the Agro-Industrial Sector of Russia" Risks 11, no. 1: 8. https://doi.org/10.3390/risks11010008
APA StyleKhoruzhy, L. I., Katkov, Y. N., Katkova, E. A., Khoruzhy, V. I., & Dzhikiya, M. K. (2023). Opportunities for the Application of a Model of Cost Management and Reduction of Risks in Financial and Economic Activity Based on the OLAP Technology: The Case of the Agro-Industrial Sector of Russia. Risks, 11(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.3390/risks11010008