Next Article in Journal
The Distribution of Paediatric Forearm Fractures: A Five-Year Retrospective Cohort Study of 4546 Forearm Fractures in Children
Previous Article in Journal
Effectiveness of Bundled Interventions for the Prevention of Neonatal Hypothermia in Low-Income Settings: A Quality Improvement Project in a Referral Hospital in Ethiopia
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Systematic Review

Reading and White Matter Development: A Systematic Review of Neuroplastic Changes in Literacy

by
Yunus Pınar
1,
Nihat Bayat
1,*,
Begümhan Yüksel
1 and
Yasin Özkara
2
1
Department of Early Childhood Education, Faculty of Education, Akdeniz University, Antalya 07058, Turkey
2
Department of Basic Education, Faculty of Education, Akdeniz University, Antalya 07058, Turkey
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Children 2025, 12(6), 710; https://doi.org/10.3390/children12060710
Submission received: 29 March 2025 / Revised: 13 May 2025 / Accepted: 24 May 2025 / Published: 30 May 2025

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Reading is a core cognitive ability that plays a central role in children’s brain development and academic success. This review aims to examine the neuroplastic relationship between reading acquisition and white matter development from infancy through adolescence, with a focus on implications for literacy interventions and educational planning. Methods: A systematic review of 89 neuroimaging studies published between 1998 and 2024 was conducted. Eligible studies utilized diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) or structural MRI to investigate white matter changes related to reading behavior in children aged 0 to 18. Studies were identified through comprehensive searches in Web of Science and Scopus databases. Results: Children with stronger reading abilities consistently showed increased fractional anisotropy (FA) in key white matter pathways, such as the arcuate fasciculus and superior longitudinal fasciculus, supporting phonological processing and reading fluency. Longitudinal data suggest that early exposure to literacy enhances brain flexibility and white matter organization. In contrast, children with reading disabilities, including dyslexia, often show disorganized white matter structure, but compensatory pathways may emerge through targeted interventions. Conclusions: Reading experience is associated with measurable changes in white matter development across childhood. Early and sustained literacy engagement appears to optimize neural structures for reading. These findings can inform early diagnosis and improve pedagogical strategies for literacy education. Further research is needed on the long-term neurobiological effects of reading interventions.

1. Introduction

Reading functions as a critical skill essential for both academic achievement and cognitive growth throughout childhood development, according to [1]. Modern neuroimaging research demonstrates that reading abilities and practices affect brain development through their impact on the structural integrity of white matter pathways vital for inter-regional brain communication [2]. Research using diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) has discovered important links between the characteristics of white matter and reading proficiency across populations of both children and adults. Structural variations have been linked to enhancements in cognitive functions, including attention, memory and language processing abilities which form key components of proficient reading. Reading is not only a foundational academic skill but also a powerful driver of neurodevelopment during childhood. Neuroimaging studies indicate that literacy experiences strengthen the white matter pathways that facilitate inter-regional brain communication [3,4].
Reading habits refer to the frequency and conditions of reading, while literacy encompasses the cognitive and linguistic skills required to understand written material and to acquire full literacy. In this systematic review, we use the term “reading habit” to refer to the frequency, regularity, and intensity of voluntary reading engagement, as reported or inferred in the included studies [5]. Across the studies included in this review, reading habit was assessed using a variety of methods, including self-report questionnaires, parental reports, and proxies such as print exposure frequency and the number of books available at home. In several longitudinal and interventional studies, structured reading programs and behavioral tasks were used to quantify reading engagement (e.g., 43, 78, 87). In line with the literature, we use the term “reading” as an umbrella construct that encompasses related concepts, such as reading habit, reading exposure, and reading experience, all of which refer to sustained and voluntary interaction with written language. These methodological and conceptual considerations reflect the multifaceted nature of reading behavior in the context of white matter development research. Research suggests that shared reading activities in early childhood promote phonological awareness and letter recognition skills that support later literacy development [6]. Children’s expressive language skills develop when parents participate in reading activities [7,8,9]. A study by [10] investigated the neural mechanisms behind early literacy events and how the combination of auditory and visual inputs enhances phonological processing. The arcuate fasciculus (AF), superior longitudinal fasciculus (SLF), and inferior longitudinal fasciculus (ILF) white matter pathways play a critical role in phonological processing, reading fluency, and comprehension [11,12]. Recent studies continue to explore how reading habits and skills affect white matter development. Neuroimaging studies indicate that these learning experiences can produce detectable structural changes in white matter integrity during key developmental periods [2,13].
Despite a growing number of studies on the neurobiological correlates of reading, there is a lack of synthesized knowledge regarding:
  • which white matter pathways are consistently implicated across studies;
  • how reading-related brain changes differ across developmental stages (e.g., preschool vs. adolescence);
  • how these patterns vary between typically developing children and those with reading difficulties such as dyslexia.
This systematic review analyzes neuroimaging research outcomes to understand how reading activities impact white matter maturation in children aged 3 to 18. Specifically, we ask:
What role do reading habits and skills play in shaping white matter pathways in the developing brains of children and adolescents, and how do these effects vary across developmental stages and between typical and atypical readers?
Our research aims to develop an integrative view of structural brain changes that occur through literacy development, while examining how early experiences with reading and targeted interventions can influence brain plasticity.

1.1. Reading Habits

Numerous studies have examined how different reading frequencies impact cognitive development. An analysis of longitudinal data on children’s reading habits demonstrated that these habits develop primarily during their preschool years and early school years [14]. Reading frequency tends to correlate with socio-economic status (SES) because individuals with lower SES commonly show decreased reading frequency [15]. The practice of reading fosters cognitive stimulation while simultaneously improving multiple cognitive and executive functions [16]. A meta-analysis study demonstrated that children who read for leisure develop larger vocabularies compared to those who read less often [17]. Ref. [18] found that adolescents who read more often displayed superior performance in vocabulary tests as well as speech act analysis and oral narrative discourse measures. Researchers analyzed how reading habits connect to emotional vocabulary by asking 465 Swedish adolescents to generate words from emotional and neutral categories while gathering data about their reading patterns. The research showed that individuals who read often used a wider range of emotional vocabulary compared to those who read less frequently, demonstrating a relationship between reading frequency and emotional language proficiency [19].

1.2. Reading Skills

An individual’s executive functions and basic reading abilities, such as decoding and semantic processing, determine how well they read across various texts. The reader’s relevant background knowledge functions as a key factor that affects their comprehension of the text [20]. Reading abilities encompass the cognitive processes that enable people to translate written material into meaning through decoding and understanding. Literacy development depends on basic skills that comprise phonological awareness and vocabulary acquisition, along with reading fluency and comprehension, as identified by [21]. Phonological awareness involves recognizing linguistic sounds and manipulating them within a language system. Phonological awareness serves as an essential foundation for reading achievement because it enables learners to decode written texts [22]. Language attainment requires vocabulary acquisition because an understanding of a text depends on the reader’s ability to derive meaning from their vocabulary knowledge. Reading fluency enables learners to quickly identify words and process them efficiently. Research shows that both reading fluency, together with vocabulary acquisition, enhance reading proficiency [23]. Reading skills demonstrate a strong association with the structural integrity of brain white matter pathways, according to neuroimaging research [24,25,26]. The arcuate fasciculus serves as an essential connection between the temporal and frontal lobes that facilitates phonological processing and reading fluency [11]. The inferior longitudinal fasciculus, which connects the occipital and temporal lobes, has been linked to processes of visual word recognition and orthographic processing, according to [12]. Studies demonstrate that children who have better reading capabilities show increased fractional anisotropy (FA) values within these neural pathways, which reflects enhanced white matter integrity and connectivity. Children who struggle with reading tasks, such as dyslexic individuals [27], demonstrate diminished white matter organization in brain regions, which implies that their reading challenges stem from structural neural pathway differences.
Research into how brain structure affects reading abilities helps us to develop better literacy education methods and interventions for reading difficulties. Neuroimaging detection of white matter abnormalities early on allows for the development of specific educational approaches to improve children’s reading skills.

2. Methods

2.1. Review Framework and Search Strategy

This systematic review followed the PRISMA 2020 guidelines [28]. We aimed to include neuroimaging studies examining how reading practices and skills influence white matter development in children and adolescents (aged 0–18 years). The search focused on studies published between 1998 and 2024, evaluating only those that met the predefined inclusion criteria. The first study included in the review was published in 1998, as the 1992 Shapiro study—a single case report on metachromatic leukodystrophy—did not broadly address reading development [29]. Figure 1 presents the PRISMA flowchart generated using the PRISMA2020 R package [28].
A comprehensive search was performed on the Web of Science Core Collection and Scopus databases, covering studies from 1998 to 2024. The Boolean search string, applied across both databases, was: (“reading skills” OR “reading development” OR literacy) AND (“white matter” OR “diffusion tensor imaging” OR DTI OR “structural connectivity”) AND (children OR adolescents OR pediatric).
The searches were conducted from December 2024 to March 2025, resulting in 253 records from Web of Science and 109 from Scopus. After excluding 78 duplicates, 284 studies remained for screening.

2.2. Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

Our review included studies published in peer-reviewed journals between 1998 and 2024, written in English, and focused on participants aged 0 to 18 years. Eligible studies used diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) or structural MRI to explore white matter structure and function in relation to reading development, literacy abilities, or behaviors such as reading habits and fluency.
We excluded studies if they: (a) included only adult participants; (b) lacked neuroimaging techniques; (c) consisted of theoretical or review articles without empirical findings; or (d) focused on cognitive areas unrelated to reading development such as math skills or general language abilities. Studies on home literacy environments were also excluded if they did not examine links to white matter structure or connectivity.

2.3. Data Extraction and Analysis

We systematically extracted data from each study that met the inclusion criteria to allow for cross-study comparison and synthesis. Key variables included participant characteristics (e.g., age range, reading ability), study design (cross-sectional or longitudinal), neuroimaging methods (e.g., DTI, structural MRI), imaging metrics (e.g., fractional anisotropy, mean diffusivity), types of reading assessments or tasks used, and the main findings regarding the relationship between reading and white matter structure.

2.4. Study Selection Process

The researchers screened 284 studies by title and abstract, following the removal of 78 duplicate records. A total of 41 studies were excluded during this stage for not meeting the initial inclusion criteria. The remaining 243 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility. Based on the predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, 154 studies did not qualify for inclusion in the review. The final qualitative synthesis included 89 studies that met all eligibility requirements.

2.5. Study Grouping

To account for methodological and developmental variation, the included studies were grouped according to study design. Cross-sectional studies investigated the relationship between white matter structure and reading abilities at a single time point. In contrast, longitudinal studies examined changes in both white matter and reading skills across different developmental stages, allowing for the observation of trajectories over time.
A standardized quality assessment tool enabled researchers to evaluate the risk of bias present in each study. The research team evaluated methodological rigor by analyzing the sample size, imaging techniques used, age range of participants, and reporting clarity. Advanced neuroimaging methods including diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and structural MRI earned better methodological quality ratings in studies. We resolved differences in bias evaluations by holding discussions.
The PRISMA flow diagram (Figure 1) summarizes the study selection process, including the number of records screened, excluded, and included in the final analysis. The diagram was generated using the PRISMA2020 R package [28].

3. Results

The systematic review covered 89 neuroimaging studies, including 64 cross-sectional studies and 25 longitudinal studies. The majority of cross-sectional studies indicated a robust link between reading abilities and white matter integrity in key neural pathways, including the superior longitudinal fasciculus (SLF), the inferior longitudinal fasciculus (ILF), and the uncinate fasciculus (UF). Multiple studies consistently reported that children with reading difficulties, such as dyslexia, exhibited lower fractional anisotropy (FA) values in these regions, critical for phonological processing and reading fluency [30,31,32]. Notably, preterm children—defined as those born before 37 weeks of gestation—also showed reduced FA values in the corpus callosum, correlating significantly with poorer reading performance [33]. According to specific cross-sectional research findings, higher FA values in the arcuate fasciculus (AF) and SLF correlated with enhanced phonological awareness, fluency, and comprehension abilities [2,13,34,35,36,37,38,39,40]. Dyslexic children showed compromised white matter connectivity, particularly in the left-lateralized structures essential for phonological processing and word recognition [41,42].
Longitudinal studies further confirmed these associations, illustrating clear developmental patterns in white matter pathways related to improvements in reading proficiency. Increased reading skills were associated with higher FA values in important white matter tracts, including the arcuate fasciculus, corpus callosum, and cerebellar regions [4]. Ref. [43] notably reported differential FA trajectories, where stronger readers initially showed lower FA values that increased over time, while poorer readers had initially higher FA values that declined. Early literacy interventions further enhanced FA growth in critical pathways, like the arcuate fasciculus and inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus (IFOF) [2,44], demonstrating how reading actively shapes white matter development. Table 1 and Table 2 present systematic methodological details and key findings from cross-sectional and longitudinal studies, respectively.
Additionally, research into reading disabilities highlighted unique neurobiological differences such as atypical compensatory mechanisms in the right hemisphere of dyslexic children, characterized by increased FA in right-lateralized pathways [45,46]. These findings underline that white matter connectivity continues to adapt dynamically in response to both developmental changes and targeted educational interventions.
Research into early literacy exposure demonstrated that pre-reading children who participated in regular literacy activities exhibited enhanced white matter development, particularly in the left inferior longitudinal fasciculus (ILF) and the left uncinate fasciculus (UF), regions involved in orthographic processing and language comprehension [13,47]. Moreover, developmental dyslexic children showed reduced FA values in neural pathways, reflecting compromised white matter connectivity [46,48]. Additionally, stronger reading abilities were associated with increased fiber density in the cross-sectional area in temporo-parietal white matter regions, further highlighting structural connectivity as a significant factor in reading development [39]. A summary of the detailed characteristics, methods, and key findings of the cross-sectional studies included in this review is provided in Table 1.
Table 1. Cross-sectional studies.
Table 1. Cross-sectional studies.
Authors Study Group N: Measures Results
1Deutsch et al., 2005 [49] Fourteen children aged 7–13 years14FA and CI in white matter tracts; reading, spelling, and rapid naming skillsLower FA and CI in left temporo-parietal pathways linked to poorer reading, spelling, and naming, supporting white matter’s role.
2Beaulieu et al., 2005 [34] Children aged 8–12 years32DTI (FA in left temporo-parietal white matter); word identification (WRMT-R)Higher FA in left temporo-parietal white matter correlates with better reading (Word ID), with the strongest correlation in the posterior internal capsule.
3Niogi and McCandliss, 2006 [50]Thirty-one children (6.5–10.3 years), including RD (reading disability) and non-impaired groups31FA in left SCR, CS, ACR; word ID, word attack, lateralization indexHigher FA in left SCR and CS correlated with better reading skills. RD group showed right lateralization, linked to poorer reading scores
4Leonard et al., 2006 [51]Children with DD, SLI, and mixed profiles (ages 11–16)22Structural MRI; anatomical risk index based on volumetric asymmetry, reading and comprehension assessmentsChildren with more symmetrical brain structures had severe comprehension deficits (SLI-like), while those with more leftward asymmetry had decoding impairments but preserved comprehension (DD-like). Anatomical profile predicted reading/differentiation patterns.
5Dougherty et al., 2007 [35]Children aged 7–12 with a range of reading abilities49DTI; FA and radial diffusivity in seven corpus callosum segments; phonological awareness (CTOPP), reading measures (WJ-III)Higher phonological awareness was significantly associated with increased radial diffusivity and lower FA in the temporal-callosal segment. Suggests better readers have fewer but larger axons, indicating reduced interhemispheric connectivity may support reading.
6Cao et al., 2008 [52]Children with and without reading difficulties (8.9–14.11 years)24fMRI, Dynamic Causal Modeling (DCM), rhyming taskChildren with reading difficulties showed weaker modulatory connectivity between left fusiform and parietal regions, especially on trials with conflicting phonological and orthographic cues. Reading skill was correlated with several connectivity patterns only in typical readers.
7Odegard et al., 2009 [53]Children with and without dyslexia (10–14 y/o)17DTI (FA); WIAT-II (real word), DST (pseudoword decoding)FA in left superior corona radiata and other tracts correlated with decoding; overlap found for real and pseudoword skills. Negative correlation in corpus callosum.
8Andrews et al., 2010 [33]Preterm (mean age 11.9 ± 1.8 years) and term children (mean age 12.7 ± 2.5 years)28DTI (FA in corpus callosum and temporo-parietal region;, reading skills (WJ-III subtests)Preterm children had lower reading scores and FA values in corpus callosum. FA in the body of corpus callosum correlated significantly with reading scores.
9Rimrodt et al., 2010 [31]Children with and without dyslexia, aged 7–1631DTI (FA, PDD); TOWRE (reading fluency), WJ-III (word ID, word attack), tractography of perisylvian networkLower FA in LIFG and temporo-parietal WM in dyslexia; FA positively correlated with reading fluency; differences linked to fiber orientation and tract overlap.
10Frye et al., 2011 [54]Adolescents (~16 y), born at term and preterm32DTI (FA, RD, SLF volume); letter–word ID, phoneme reversal, word attackFA and RD in left SLF significantly correlated with reading measures; SLF volume linked to reading only in preterm-born group.
11Yeatman et al., 2011 [40]Children aged 7–11 years55DTI (FA, RD in AF); phonological awareness, memory, and word readingHigher FA in the left AF correlated with better phonological awareness and memory, with left-lateralized volume predicting reading skills.
12Raschle et al., 2011 [55]Pre-reading children with (FHD+) and without (FHD−) familial risk for dyslexia20VBM, RAN; family history, gray matter volumeReduced GMV in left occipitotemporal and parietotemporal regions in children at risk; positive correlation between GMV and rapid automatized naming.
13Feldman et al., 2012 [56]Forty-two children (23 preterm, 19 full-term), aged 9–16 years42FA in corpus callosum, AF, SLF; verbal IQ, syntactic comprehension, decoding, and reading comprehensionPreterm group showed FA correlations with language and reading in ventral and dorsal tracts; no such links in full-term group.
14Saygin et al., 2013 [13]Pre-readers and early readers (Kindergarten children, aged ~5 years)40Diffusion MRI (FA, volume in AF, ILF, SLFp); CTOPP, WRMT-R, and RANPhonological awareness correlated with FA and volume in left AF; no link to RAN or letter knowledge.
15Gullick and Booth, 2015 [37]Children aged 8–14 years47DTI (FA in AF), fMRI (pSTS activity), word reading (rhyme judgment)Better reading skills and cross-modal task performance linked to higher FA in left arcuate fasciculus, with pSTS activity predicting AF integrity.
16Myers et al., 2014 [57]38 children aged 5–6 years at baseline, followed until Grade 338WM volume changes; reading skillsLeft dorsal WM growth (such as, AF) predicted Grade 3 reading outcomes, beyond familial, env., and pre-literacy factors.
17Horowitz-Kraus et al., 2014 [58]Typically developing adolescents aged 15–19 years21DTI (FA in arcuate fasciculus and inferior longitudinal fasciculus); TOWRE-II (sight word efficiency), WJ-III (passage comprehension)Right ILF was associated with word reading efficiency; left ILF and bilateral AF, especially right AF, were associated with reading comprehension. Findings support the Simple View of Reading, indicating distinct white matter correlates for word- and sentence-level reading.
18Broce et al., 2015 [59]Typically developing children (ages 5–8)19DWI (FA in arcuate fasciculus [segments] and frontal aslant tract); CELF-4 receptive language,FA in bilateral AF predicted expressive and receptive language; FA in left AF increased with age; left FAT length predicted receptive language scores.
19Skeide et al., 2015 [32]Children aged 9–12 years50Phonological awareness, spelling DTI (FA of arcuate fasciculus), rs-fMRIGenetic variant rs11100040 was associated with functional and structural connectivity (arcuate fasciculus FA) between phonological regions. Structural connectivity was linked to phonological awareness, which in turn predicted spelling and dyslexia risk scores.
20Travis et al., 2015 [26]Forty-five children and adolescents (9–17 years)45FA in cerebellar peduncles (SCP, MCP, ICP); decoding, reading comprehensionFA in MCP positively correlated with decoding and comprehension; left SCP and ICP showed negative correlations.
21Richards et al., 2015 [30]Grades 4–9: dysgraphia (n = 14), dyslexia (n = 17), controls (n = 9)40DTI (FA, RA, AD); fMRI during writing; spelling, alphabet, planning, resting stateWM integrity (FA, RA, AD) higher in controls; dyslexia and dysgraphia showed distinct WM–fMRI connectivity patterns during writing tasks.
22Gullick et al., 2016 [38]Typically developing children, SES stratified42DTI (FA in ILF, SLF, CST); real-word reading scores, SESHigh SES: left ILF/SLF FA correlated with reading. Low SES: right ILF FA correlated with reading, suggesting divergent neural strategies.
23Travis et al., 2016 [60]Forty-two children (5.8–6.8 years), 31 Readers, 11 Pre-readers42FA in white matter; phonological awareness, language, and pseudoword decodingReaders had higher FA in left aSLF and right UF; aSLF-L linked to phonological awareness, UF-R to language skills.
24Borst et al., 2016 [61]Typically developing children aged 9–10 years16Anatomical MRI (sulcal morphology of left and right OTS); oral reading (Alouette-R test)Left OTS sulcal pattern predicted reading accuracy; interrupted OTS linked to better word reading.
25Travis et al., 2017 [62]Six-year-old children (readers and pre-readers)42Cross-sectional, FA in white matter tracts (e.g., left anterior SLF, right UF); reading skills, phonological awareness, language skillsReaders had higher FA compared to pre-readers; FA significantly correlated with phonological awareness and language skills.
26De Moura et al., 2016 [48]Forty children aged 8–12 years: 17 poor readers, 23 good readers40FA in AF, ILF, cingulum; word-level reading abilityPoor readers had lower FA in bilateral white matter tracts, indicating reduced fiber coherence.
27Mürner-Lavanchy et al., 2018 [63]Very preterm (VPT) and term-born children, age 7178DTI (FA, RD, MD), NODDI (axon density), TBSS, arcuate fasciculus tractography; language tests (semantics, grammar, phonological awareness)Higher FA and axon density, and lower RD, AD, MD were associated with better performance in semantics, grammar, and phonological awareness in both groups.
28Sun et al., 2017 [64]Children with variable reading skills66ROBO1 genotyping, DTI (FA in corpus callosum); word-list reading.ROBO1 polymorphisms influence reading via FA in the genu of the corpus callosum; genu FA mediates gene-to-reading effect.
29Arrington et al., 2017 [24]School-aged children with typical or poor decoding skills76Reading accuracy, fluency, comprehension, and white matter integrity (FA values)White matter integrity in SLF, ILF, and UF correlated with reading; poor readers showed distinct tract reliance.
30Horowitz-Kraus et al., 2017 [65]Adolescents with mood or behavioral disorders and controls (11–17 y)39DTI (FA); CTOPP (phonemic awareness), WJ-III (orthographic processing, reading comprehension)Reading skills correlated with FA in AF, ILF, SLF, IFOF; mood disorders showed lower comprehension and phonological scores and altered WM–reading associations.
31Wang et al., 2017 [66]Seventy-eight children (5–12 years)78FA, RD, and AD in AF, SLF, ILF; reading fluency, phonological awareness, and familial riskFHD+ children had lower FA and atypical left AF lateralization; faster FA growth in right SLF aided compensation in good readers.
32Su et al., 2018 [41]Forty Chinese children (18 with dyslexia, 22 controls), mean age 11.1 years40FA in left AF (dorsal) and left ILF (ventral), phonological, morphological, and orthographic processing skillsReduced FA in left AF linked to phonological deficits and in left ILF to morphological deficits, showing dual-pathway disruption.
33Su et al., 2018 [67]Chinese children (longitudinal, ages 4–14)79Vocabulary development (ages 4–10); DTI at age 14 (FA in arcuate fasciculus)Children with consistently poor vocabulary growth showed significantly reduced FA in the left arcuate fasciculus, particularly in the posterior and direct segments. Vocabulary growth rate was a significant predictor of FA, independent of initial vocabulary level.
34Lou et al., 2019 [46]Children with developmental dyslexia (n = 26) and age-matched controls (n = 31)57Net. metrics (clustering, efficiency), literacy skills (reading, phonemes)Dyslexic children had reduced left occipito-temporo-parietal connectivity, correlating with literacy skills beyond known abnormalities.
35Banfi et al., 2019 [68]Children with dyslexia, isolated spelling deficits, and typical peers (Grade 3)69DTI (FA via AFQ); SLRT-II (word and pseudoword reading), spelling test, PA, RAN, IQDyslexia group showed higher FA in bilateral ILF and right SLF; FA in right ILF negatively correlated with reading; left AF FA correlated with spelling in SD group.
36Huber et al., 2019 [69]Children aged 7–12 with varied reading skills53DTI, WMTI, NODDI, Woodcock–Johnson basic reading compositeAWF and ICVF in posterior corpus callosum correlated significantly with reading skill; results robust after controlling for age and motion.
37Dubner et al., 2019 [70]Preterm with inflammation (PT+), preterm without inflammation (PT−), full-term (FT)78FA and MD in 7 corpus callosum segments; WRMT-III (reading), WASI-II (IQ), BRIEF (executive function)Reading correlated with occipital FA (r = 0.32, p < 0.01); PT+ group had lower FA and higher MD in multiple callosal segments compared to PT and FT groups.
38Broce et al., 2019 [71]Typically developing children (5–8 y/o)60DTI (FA in AF, ILF, IFOF, VOF); phonological awareness; decodingFA in AF, ILF, and VOF predicted early literacy skills; VOF newly identified as relevant for early reading development.
39Del Tufo et al., 2019 [72] Children with early expressive language delay340Reading/listening comprehension tests (e.g., QRI, WJ-PC), expressive language milestones, FA of left ILF (DTI)Later expressive language milestones predicted poorer comprehension. Left ILF moderated the relationship. Early intervention reduced the risk of poor comprehension by 39% in at-risk children.
40Vanderauwera et al., 2019 [73]Adolescents aged 13–14, wide range of reading skills34DTI (FA, AD, RD), word and pseudoword fluency tests (Een-minuut-Test, Klepel), SES via paternal educationFA in left long AF and UF positively associated with word reading; SES also linked to FA and reading skills, suggesting environmental effects.
41De Vos et al., 2020 [74] Typically developing pre-readers59DTI (FA in left AF); auditory steady-state response, phonological awareness tasksRightward lateralization of 4Hz syllable-rate processing associated with higher FA in left AF; both predicted better phonological processing.
42Beaulieu et al., 2020 [75] Children and adolescents (aged 10–18 years)20myelin water fraction (MWF) imaging; standardized reading testsLower MWF in poor readers in corpus callosum, thalamus, and internal capsule; MWF positively correlated with reading scores.
43Geeraert et al., 2020 [76]Typically developing children aged 6–16 years46DTI, neurite orientation dispersion and NODDI, magnetization transfer imagingWhite matter microstructure developed with age but showed no direct link to reading skills.
44Hutton et al., 2020 [77]Preschoolers aged 3–5, typical development47DTI (FA, AD, RD, MD); StimQ-P2 READ (HLE), EVT-2, GRTR, TRH, CTOPP-2 RANHigher HLE scores associated with lower AD, RD, MD in AF, ILF, UF; book reading quantity linked to higher FA and better emergent literacy skills.
45Bruckert et al., 2020 [78]Twenty-three children, aged 8 years (mean age = 8.2, 12 male)23FA and R1 in SCP, MCP, and ICP; word reading efficiencyReading efficiency negatively correlated with FA in SCPs; no R1 link, suggesting non-myelin factors influence FA-reading associations.
46Zhao et al., 2021 [79]Ninety-six children aged 8–12 years,96FA in AF, SLF, corpus callosum, cerebellar tracts; phonological and reading fluencyDyslexia linked to reduced left AF and SLF connectivity; better reading correlated with stronger corpus callosum and cerebellar pathways.
47Lou et al., 2021 [80]Children with and without reading disabilities64DTI, whole-brain connectome; feeder connection strength, word reading efficiency, phonemic decodingFeeder connections between hubs and non-hubs significantly correlated with word reading efficiency and phonemic decoding; effects stronger in girls.
48Van Der Auwera et al., 2021 [81]Children with and without dyslexia; three time points (pre-, early-, and advanced-reading stages)52DTI; word and pseudoword reading (Grades 2–5), phonological awarenessFA in left arcuate fasciculus was lower in pre-readers who developed dyslexia and predicted later word and pseudoword reading skills.
49Zuk et al., 2021 [82]At-risk children followed from Kindergarten to Grade 274DTI (FA in posterior right SLF); TOWRE-2, WRMT-III, SES, phonological awareness, speech accuracyHigher FA in right posterior SLF predicted better decoding in at-risk children. SES, speech accuracy, and PA also predicted successful reading outcomes.
50Wang et al., 2021 [83]Typically developing children (n = 22) and children with reading difficulties (n = 24), aged ~9 years46Diffusion spectrum imaging; reading comprehension test, Chinese character recognition testRD group showed reduced white matter integrity (GFA, NQA); reading comprehension and character recognition linked to corpus callosum indices.
51Liu et al., 2021 [79]Children aged 9–14 with and without dyslexia57DTI-based graph analysis (FA in right fusiform gyrus); word and pseudoword reading accuracy, spellingIn children with dyslexia, higher FA in the right fusiform gyrus was negatively correlated with reading accuracy, suggesting maladaptive compensation.
52Koirala et al., 2021 [84]Children aged 6–16 (typical and struggling readers)412DWI (NODDI: ODI, NDI); single word reading, phonological processingLower ODI and NDI associated with better reading and phonological processing; phonological processing mediated the WM–reading relationship.
53Yu et al., 2022 [85] Adolescents with PAE (FAS/PFAS, HE), controls74DTI (ILF lateralization, FA), fMRI; phonological processing, readingFAS/PFAS group showed rightward ILF lateralization and increased right hemisphere activation; HE group showed weaker left ILF–reading correlations.
54Gao et al., 2022 [36] Chinese–English bilingual children, aged 8.2–1240DTI (FA in left/right arcuate fasciculus); English and Chinese reading tests, phonological awareness, visual–spatial abilityEnglish reading was associated with FA in left AF (especially caudal nodes, correlated with phonological awareness); Chinese reading was associated with FA in right AF (correlated with visual-spatial ability). Findings support both language-universal and language-specific white matter mechanisms.
55Liu et al., 2022 [27]Fifty-seven children (9–14 years), including 26 with dyslexia and 31 matched controls57FA values in right fusiform gyrus (FFG); reading accuracy, pseudoword reading, spelling accuracyHigher FA in the right FFG negatively correlated with word and pseudoword reading accuracy in dyslexic children, suggesting maladaptive compensation.
56Meisler and Gabrieli, 2022 [39]Children and adolescents (6–18 years)983Diffusion MRI (FDC, FD, FC metrics); word-reading efficiency test (TOWRE)Higher FDC in left temporo-parietal white matter correlated with better reading; no differences between reading-disabled and typical groups.
57Meisler and Gabrieli, 2022 [86]Six hundred and eighty-six children aged 5–18 years, with and without reading disabilities686FA values in white matter tracts; TOWRE composite scores (SWE and PDE)No significant FA differences in groups. Positive FA associations with nonword reading in older children (9+), particularly in right SLF and left ICP.
58Brignoni-Pérez et al., 2021 [45]Children born full-term (FT) and preterm (PT), average age: 879Oral reading index, FA from dMRI, R1 metric from qT1 relaxometryFT: Reading correlated with FA in dorsal tracts; PT: reading correlated with R1 in dorsal and ventral tracts.
59Ostertag et al., 2023 [87]Children with and without prenatal alcohol exposure, age 557DTI (FA, AD in arcuate fasciculus); NEPSY-II (speeded naming, phonological processing), vocabularyIn PAE children, greater FA in right AF predicted better speeded naming; higher AD in left AF was linked to better phonological processing. No such associations were found in controls. Indicates altered white matter–language function relationships in PAE.
60Harriott et al., 2023 [88]Children with NF1 (M = 12.5 years)28Word reading, phonological awareness, visuospatial skills; MRI (T2/FLAIR UBO volume);Total UBO volume significantly predicted word reading and phonological awareness, even when controlling for age, sex, scanner, and PIQ.
61Zhao et al., 2023 [42]Children with developmental dyslexia and age-matched controls57high-angular diffusion imaging (HARDI), spherical deconvolution tractography, HMOA in AF segments; reading accuracy (words, nonwords, meaningless text)Lateralization index (LI) of AFAS correlated with nonword and meaningless text reading; LI of AFLS correlated with word reading. Findings suggest segment-specific compensatory lateralization in dyslexia.
62Vandecruys et al., 2024 [89]Typically developing preschoolers (mean age ≈ 5.6 years)56DWI; phonological awareness, letter knowledge; tracts: bilateral IFOF, ILF, anterior and direct arcuate fasciculusBilateral IFOF microstructure was associated with both reading and math precursors; associations were shared, not specific to reading alone.
63Ghasoub et al., 2024 [90]Typically developing children (ages 2–6)81Diffusion MRI; graph-theory analysis, NEPSY-II phonological processing, and speeded namingPhonological processing scores positively associated with efficiency and clustering in reading-language structural networks, especially right hemisphere.
64Cross et al., 2023 [91]Sixty-five children aged 8–14 years65DTI (FA in AF, ILF, IFOF, uncinate fasciculus); single word reading, decoding, comprehension, rapid naming tasksHigher FA in left AF associated with better decoding efficiency; higher FA in left IFOF positively linked with reading comprehension; greater FA in right ILF and bilateral uncinate fasciculus negatively correlated with reading comprehension and rapid naming skills
Notes: FA: Fractional Anisotropy; CI: Coherence Index; SCR: Superior Corona Radiata; CS: Centrum Semiovale; ACR: Anterior Corona Radiata; AD: Axial Diffusivity; RD: Reading Disability; AF: Arcuate Fasciculus; SLF: Superior Longitudinal Fasciculus; SLFp: Superior Longitudinal Fasciculus, posterior segment; ILF: Inferior Longitudinal Fasciculus; pSTS: posterior Superior Temporal Sulcus; SCP: Superior Cerebellar Peduncle; MCP: Middle Cerebellar Peduncle; ICP: Inferior Cerebellar Peduncle; OTS: Occipitotemporal Sulcus; AF-L: Left Arcuate Fasciculus; SLF-L: Left Superior Longitudinal Fasciculus; UF-R: Right Uncinate Fasciculus; MD: Mean Diffusivity; IFOF: Inferior Fronto-Occipital Fasciculus; MWF: Myelin Water Fraction; FDC: Fiber Density and Cross-Section; GFA: Generalized Fractional Anisotropy; NQA: Neurite Quantification Algorithm; WRMT-R: Woodcock Reading Mastery Tests—Revised; WJ-III: Woodcock–Johnson Tests of Cognitive Abilities—Third Edition; CTOPP: Comprehensive Test of Phonological Processing; WRMT-R: Woodcock Reading Mastery Tests—Revised; RAN: Rapid Automatized Naming; TOWRE: Test of Word Reading Efficiency; SWE: Sight Word Efficiency; PDE: Phonemic Decoding Efficiency; WRAT-3: Wide Range Achievement Test—Third Edition; WJ-III Word ID: Woodcock–Johnson III Word Identification.
Cross-sectional DTI studies have revealed that white matter integrity in the SLF, ILF, and UF may be correlated with reading; poor readers showed distinct tract dependence [24,55,66]. Studies have revealed that preterm infants have lower reading scores and lower FA values in the corpus callosum [33]. Lower FA has also been reported in the left inferior frontal gyrus (LIFG) and temporo-parietal white matter in individuals with dyslexia [13,30,55]. Some evidence indicates segment-specific compensatory lateralization in individuals with dyslexia [4]. In addition, better reading ability was associated with stronger pathways in the corpus callosum and cerebellum [92].
Longitudinal studies further support these associations, revealing that white matter integrity develops dynamically in response to reading. [43] reported that children with strong reading skills initially had lower FA that increased over time. In contrast, children with weaker reading abilities exhibited higher initial FA values that declined. This pattern suggests distinct developmental trajectories in reading-related neural pathways. In addition, early exposure to print materials and phonological instruction predicted higher FA growth in the AF and inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus (IFOF), further emphasizing the importance of early literacy interventions [16,93]. These findings highlight how early reading engagement actively influences neural plasticity and suggest that genetic and environmental factors collectively influence the development of the white matter pathways that support literacy.
Studies investigating children with reading disabilities have provided additional insights into neurobiological differences. Children with dyslexia showed atypical right-hemisphere compensation mechanisms, as evidenced by increased FA in the right fusiform gyrus and right SLF, possibly reflecting inefficient neural adaptations [45,94]. The persistence of these alterations across developmental stages suggests that white matter connectivity is not static but continues to evolve in response to environmental stimuli such as educational interventions and reading exposure.
Table 2 presents an overview of longitudinal and other studies, including the study groups, measures, and key results.
Table 2. Longitudinal studies.
Table 2. Longitudinal studies.
Authors Study Group N: Measures Results
1 Hoeft et al., 2011 [95] Children with and without dyslexia (6–12 y/o) 45 DTI (right SLF); fMRI during phonological task; reading assessments over 2.5 years WM organization in right SLF predicted long-term reading gains in dyslexia; behavioral predictors alone were not sufficient.
2 Yeatman et al., 2012 [4] 55 children, aged 7–15 years (39 with at least 3 measurements) 55 FA in left AF and ILF; standardized reading scores Above-average readers had low initial FA that increased over time; below-average readers had high initial FA that declined, reflecting differing developmental trajectories.
3 Gullick and Booth, 2015 [37]Children aged 8–14 years30Diffusion MRI (FA in AF); reading assessments (real-word reading, pseudoword reading)Higher FA in the direct segment of the AF at baseline was predictive of greater improvements in reading skills over a three-year period.
4 Kraft et al., 2016 [96]Pre-reading children with and without family risk of DD; followed into Grade 1 or 253Quantitative T1 MRI (left anterior AF); behavioral literacy precursors (phonological representations, RAN); reading/spelling tests (SLRT-II, ELFE, DERET)Increased T1 intensity (↓ myelin) in left anterior AF in risk group. Neuroanatomical predictor model (incl. AF) predicted DD better (80%) than behavioral-only model (63%). T1 of left anterior AF was significant predictor of later DD.
5 Takeuchi et al., 2016 [2]Healthy Japanese children296FA; verbal comprehension scores (WAIS-III, WISC-III)Stronger reading habits increased FA in left AF, IFOF, PCR.
6 Vandermosten et al., 2017 [44]Pre-readers (Kindergarten children aged ~5–6)71Diffusion MRI (FA of IFOF and AF); cognitive reading precursors (PA, RAN), parental reading dataPaternal reading skills mediate early childhood reading outcomes via left IFOF, SES impacts white matter structure.
7 Vanderauwera et al., 2018 [97]61 children: pre-reading stage (5–6 years) and early reading stage (7–8 years)61FA in ventral pathways (IFOF, ILF, UF); phonological awareness, orthographic knowledgeLeft IFOF supported orthographic knowledge at early stages of reading. No ventral pathways supported phonological processes.
8 Huber et al., 2018 [98]Struggling grade-school readers (ages 7–12)24 Diffusion MRI (white matter metrics); reading assessments (Woodcock–Johnson, TOWRE) Significant improvement in reading skills and widespread white matter changes over 8-week intervention.
9 Richards et al., 2018 [99]Dyslexia (n = 20), OWL LD (n = 6), dysgraphia (n = 10), typical readers (n = 6); Grades 4–942DTI (AD, MD), fMRI clustering coefficient; word, sentence, and text-level silent reading tasks pre/post 18 computerized lessons WM–GM correlations emerged post-instruction only: (1) AD in left superior frontal ↔ right IFG (word reading); (2) MD in left superior corona radiata ↔ left MFG (sentence); (3) MD in left anterior corona radiata ↔ right MFG (text). Reading gains observed behaviorally.
10 Bruckert et al., 2019 [100]Seventy-one children: 34 preterm (PT) and 37 full-term (FT), aged 6–8 years71FA in AF, SLF, ICP; phonological awareness, language, reading fluencyFA in dorsal and cerebellar pathways predicted reading outcomes in FT but not in PT children, suggesting distinct neural adaptations in PT group.
11 Lebel et al., 2018 [47]Children (9.5 ± 1.3 years)70FA and MD in white matter tracts; reading fluency, phonological decoding, and sight word readingFA increased with age in non-impaired readers, absent in dysfluent readers. Faster MD decreases in dysfluent inaccurate readers suggest compensatory changes (e.g., corona radiata, uncinate).
12 Borchers et al., 2019 [101]Typically developing children aged 6–8 years37Diffusion MRI (FA in left and right SLF, left Arcuate, left ICP); cognitive assessments (language, phonological awareness)White matter properties (FA) at age 6 in specific pathways (SLF, Arcuate, ICP) predict reading outcomes at age 8, beyond pre-literacy skills and demographic factors.
13 Su et al., 2020 [16]Seventy-nine children; language and reading assessments from aged 1–14 years;79FA in AF, IFOF; early family factors (SES, literacy exposure), vocabulary growth rateEarlier literacy exposure and SES correlated with higher FA in left AF and IFOF. Vocabulary growth rate predicted FA in left AF-posterior and AF-direct.
14 Partanen et al., 2020 [102]87 children: 46 dyslexic, 41 average readers; aged 8–12 years87FA and MD in white matter tracts; voxel-based analysis of gray matter, reading fluencyChanges in white matter microstructure (lower MD) in right-hemisphere predicted reading fluency improvement. Gray matter showed no significant associations
15 Phan et al., 2021 [103]Children aged 6–10 (typical and dyslexic readers)41Longitudinal T1 MRI (PBVC + scaling); reading assessments (word reading, pseudoword reading)Cortical volume in the left reading network (temporo-parietal regions) increased during early reading stages and stabilized later. Dyslexic readers showed compensatory mechanisms in the right-hemisphere (right pars opercularis and isthmus cingulate).
16 Brignoni-Pérez et al., 2021 [45]Very preterm infants (24–31 weeks GA), randomized to maternal speech vs. control42DTI (FA, MD) at 36 weeks PMA and 12 months AA; language via MacArthur–Bates CDI at 12–18 months AAInfants exposed to increased maternal speech showed enhanced white matter development and higher language scores.
17 Zhou et al., 2022 [92]Preschool children aged 2–7 years73 DTI (FA, MD); phonological processing raw score, rapid naming scoresIncreased FA in internal capsule and IFOF correlated with phonological processing ability; mediation analysis showed age-related changes in FA supported phonological skill development.
18 Beelen et al., 2022 [104]Children aged 8–11 (grades 2 and 5)43Structural MRI (left fusiform gyrus size); reading skills (word and pseudoword reading tasks)Early reading skills (grade 2) predicted an increase in the size of the left fusiform gyrus by grade 5. However, the size of the left fusiform gyrus in grade 2 did not predict later reading skills, indicating behavior-driven brain plasticity.
19 Manning et al., 2022 [94]Preschool children aged 3.5–4.5 years35Diffusion MRI (FA, RD, AD in SLF), resting-state fMRI (functional connectivity); pre-reading skills (NEPSY-II speeded naming, phonological processing)Structural features in SLF and functional connectivity in fronto-parietal networks at 3.5 years predicted better pre-reading skills (phonological processing, speeded naming) at 4.5 years.
20 Weiss et al., 2022 [43]Fifty-three children; subset of 20 underwent MRI at 2 years53 Parent–child conversational turns; FA and MPF in AF, SLF; letter knowledge and phonological awarenessParent and conversational turns at 14 months correlated with literacy skills at 5 years. AF myelination mediated the relationship between early language input and literacy.
21 Davison et al., 2023 [105]Children aged 5–10 (PLING cohort)77DTI (FA); left/right AF and SLF; lateralization index, parent-reported shared reading, standardized reading and language tests (TOWRE-2, GORT-5, PPVT-4, CELF-5)More shared reading in Kindergarten was linked to greater FA and left-lateralized SLF, which predicted better word reading fluency in Grade 2.
22 Ghasoub et al., 2024 [106]Children aged 3–7 with and without prenatal alcohol exposure (PAE); repeated DTI scans135DTI (graph theory metrics in reading network), NEPSY-II phonological processing and speeded namingChildren with PAE had lower pre-reading scores and lower graph theory metrics (global efficiency, nodal degree). PAE moderated brain–behavior associations: stronger links between phonological processing and network efficiency in PAE group.
23 Lou et al., 2024 [107]Children aged 8–14 with and without reading disabilities64Diffusion-weighted MRI, connectome-based graph theory analysis of left thalamus; TOWRE-PDE (phonemic decoding), RAN (rapid automatized naming), SWE (sight word efficiency), reading comprehensionTransmission cost of the left thalamus (in reading network) was positively correlated with phonemic decoding. Local efficiency and clustering coefficient were negatively correlated with RAN. Stronger pulvinar and mediodorsal thalamic nucleus connections to temporal areas were negatively associated with decoding. Results were replicated in a validation sample.
24 Vandecruys et al., 2024 [93]Preschool children (Mage ≈ 5.5 years); schooling vs. non-schooling groups67Longitudinal DTI; FA and MD in AF, ILF, IFOF, CC; word reading, letter knowledge (DMT)Behavioral reading skills improved significantly in the schooling group, but white matter changes were driven by age-related maturation, not schooling.
25 Roy et al., 2024 [108]Children and young adults from diverse demographic backgrounds14,249Reading skills (e.g., TOWRE scores), white matter integrity (FA values), socio-economic factorsDynamic relationship between reading skill gains and white matter changes over time. No evidence of static white matter properties predicting reading skills across cross-sectional datasets.
Notes: AD: Axial Diffusivity; RD: radial diffusivity; AF: Arcuate Fasciculus; IFOF: Inferior Fronto-Occipital Fasciculus; PCR: Posterior Corona Radiata; FA: Fractional Anisotropy; SLF: Superior Longitudinal Fasciculus; ICP: Inferior Cerebellar Peduncle; ILF: Inferior Longitudinal Fasciculus; UF: Uncinate Fasciculus; WAIS-III: Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale—Third Edition; WISC-III: Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children—Third Edition.
The systematic analysis of the 89 included studies consistently highlighted specific neurostructural patterns linked to literacy development. The left arcuate fasciculus (AF) emerged as the most-studied white matter tract, according to studies by [37,83,108]. These studies indicated that greater FA within the left AF led to better phonological awareness, as well as improved word reading and memory skills across multiple studies [16,21,35,36,37,45,80,83,107,108]. Children who achieved higher reading scores showed strong left lateralization in this brain tract. Studies involving preterm children [33,56] revealed reduced FA scores in both the corpus callosum and temporo-parietal regions, which were associated with poorer reading skills. Early disruptions in neural development may affect the maturation of white matter structures that support literacy.
Several studies have made comparisons between typically developing children and those with risk factors for reading disability (RD). [50] showed that children with RD had right-lateralized FA patterns associated with poor reading performance. [54] observed clear differences between association and projection pathways in individuals with reading difficulties. FA emerged as the most reliable white matter metric across studies, as it typically showed positive associations with reading and language skills. Different studies showed variability in additional metrics (RD, AD, CI), resulting in some inconsistencies, primarily due to sample heterogeneity and differences in cognitive measures.
Research suggests that white matter integrity in the dorsal language pathways of the left hemisphere plays a critical role in the development of the phonological and decoding skills necessary for early reading. Research from longitudinal and early intervention studies (e.g., [13]) shows that white matter structure serves as both a marker of current skills and a predictor of future reading skills.

4. Discussion

This review was designed to examine how the acquisition of literacy—particularly in childhood—interacts with the structural organization of the brain, with a specific focus on white matter adaptations detectable via neuroimaging. Across 89 studies, we identified consistent associations between reading development and microstructural changes in left-hemispheric tracts, most notably the arcuate fasciculus (AF), the superior longitudinal fasciculus (SLF), and the inferior longitudinal fasciculus (ILF). Importantly, these associations did not appear in isolation but were modulated by developmental context: the child’s age, pre-existing cognitive profile, and whether reading was supported through targeted instruction or emerged through autonomous engagement. Rather than representing a linear progression, white matter development in the context of literacy appears to reflect a highly plastic and experience-dependent reorganization process.
The findings of this review provide substantial evidence that reading habits and skills play a critical role in shaping white matter development. The observed associations between FA values in key white matter tracts and literacy skills suggest that regular reading engagement actively modifies neural pathways, thus supporting experience-dependent plasticity [4,13].
A crucial finding is the impact of early reading on neural structures. Children exposed to print materials from a young age demonstrate greater maturation of the left AF and ILF, which are essential for phonological processing and word recognition [13,47]. These findings support the hypothesis that environmental stimulation drives structural brain changes [2,44].
In addition to cross-sectional evidence, longitudinal studies further support these findings by demonstrating distinct white matter developmental trajectories in skilled and struggling readers. [4] found that children with strong reading abilities exhibit progressive increases in FA values, whereas children with reading difficulties experienced a decline in FA over time, suggesting that white matter plasticity is sensitive to ongoing literacy experiences. [37] further found that children with stronger FA in the direct segment of the AF demonstrated greater reading improvement over three years. These results highlight the importance of early intervention programs to support children at risk of reading impairments.
Children with developmental reading difficulties, such as dyslexia, exhibit distinct white matter alterations, particularly in the right-hemisphere tracts, suggesting compensatory mechanisms [27,45]. Increased FA in the right fusiform gyrus and right SLF may facilitate some reading functions and indicate inefficient processing strategies, reinforcing the need for targeted interventions to enhance left-lateralized reading networks. Furthermore, studies using multimodal imaging approaches have suggested that myelination deficits in these regions contribute to reading difficulties, highlighting the role of white matter integrity in reading proficiency [75,102].
Another critical insight gained from these findings is the relationship between the environmental factors and neural plasticity. Children who engage in regular reading exhibit higher fiber density and connectivity in reading-related white matter tracts (e.g., [2,13,37,39,47,98]). Similarly, ref. [2] demonstrated that frequent reading was associated with increased FA in the IFOF and AF, emphasizing the role of sustained literacy engagement in brain plasticity. This suggests that reading interventions are beneficial for improving literacy skills and have a direct impact on brain structures.
Findings from interventional studies further support the role of structured reading programs in modifying the white matter structure. Huber et al. (2018) [98] demonstrated that an eight-week reading intervention led to widespread white matter changes, particularly in motor-integration pathways such as the posterior corona radiata and inferior cerebellar peduncle. These results confirm that reading is both a cognitive skill and a driver of neurodevelopment, and that interventions tailored to enhance reading fluency can lead to measurable neural adaptations [2,37,44,81,95,96,97,102].
Furthermore, findings from studies on preterm children indicate that early disruptions in white matter development can have long-term consequences for reading ability. [33] found that preterm children exhibited lower FA values in corpus callosum tracts, correlating with poorer reading performance in later childhood. This highlights the importance of early identification and targeted reading support for at-risk populations.
The dynamic relationship between reading habits and brain structure highlights the need for early literacy interventions, particularly for at-risk children. As neural plasticity continues into adolescence, future research should explore the long-term impact of different types of reading exposure and intervention strategies that optimize white matter development. Understanding how reading shapes the brain will inform educational best practices and provide neuroscientific insights into literacy acquisition and its broader cognitive benefits. Future studies should employ longitudinal neuroimaging methods to examine how different types of reading interventions influence structural brain changes over time and explore the role of digital reading formats in shaping white matter connectivity compared to traditional print reading.
In light of the reviewed evidence, literacy emerges not merely as a cultural skill but as a biologically embedded force capable of reshaping brain architecture. The observed plasticity within white matter pathways—particularly those implicated in phonological processing and orthographic–phonological integration—underscores the sensitivity of the developing brain to literacy-related input. While considerable variability exists across age, population, and methodology, the overall trajectory points to a consistent theme: that structured reading exposure, especially when embedded in targeted interventions, can promote measurable neuroanatomical changes. This reinforces our initial aim of synthesizing a coherent framework for understanding the neurostructural correlates of literacy acquisition. Future research integrating behavioral, longitudinal, and interventional designs will be essential to refine this framework and translate it into pedagogical and clinical practice.

Limitations and Future Directions

This review provides a comprehensive summary of current neuroimaging research on reading and white matter development in children and adolescents; however, it is important to recognize certain limitations, including the lack of linguistic and cultural diversity in the reviewed studies. The exclusive use of Web of Science and SCOPUS as databases may have resulted in the exclusion of relevant studies indexed elsewhere. In addition, the diversity of age groups, imaging protocols and literacy measures in the included studies limited the potential for direct comparisons or meta-analyses. As part of this review, we synthesized findings from 89 neuroimaging studies and identified several consistent trends as well as important limitations. Most research utilized diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) methods to examine white matter structures like the arcuate fasciculus (AF), superior longitudinal fasciculus (SLF), and inferior longitudinal fasciculus (ILF). The bulk of research targeted children between 6 to 12 years old; only a small number of studies examined early childhood or adolescent periods. The research consistently showed white matter alterations connected to literacy but displayed significant methodological diversity through varied reading assessments, imaging parameters, and sample characteristics. The scarcity of studies investigating longitudinal trajectories and intervention outcomes restricts our knowledge of developmental timing and causal relationships. Future research would benefit from more standardized methods and greater reporting of null results to reduce publication bias. Studies that include linguistic and cultural diversity may also deepen our understanding of white matter development. The results of the review highlight the need for early identification and treatment of reading difficulties at crucial stages of brain development for practical applications. To improve reading skills and potentially support white matter development, policy makers and education systems need to adopt early diagnostic methods and specific educational programs. Collaboration between teachers, brain researchers and medical professionals can help to create literacy programs that match the developmental pathways of children’s brains.

5. Conclusions

The review demonstrates how children’s reading practices and abilities affect their brain’s white matter pathway development. The AF, ILF, and SLF white matter tracts demonstrate increased FA levels and myelination with stronger connectivity in children who frequently read and show high literacy proficiency.
Engaging in reading activities from an early age leads to enhanced white matter plasticity, which supports how reading habits shape neural structures. Exposure to literacy-rich environments enhances white matter pathways, leading to improved phonological awareness, reading fluency, and comprehension. Children who have reading disabilities, like dyslexia, show decreased FA and abnormal connectivity patterns, which indicates that poor white matter organization may obstruct reading skill development. Targeted reading interventions and phonological training programs produce measurable changes in white matter structure, indicating that literacy instruction can effectively influence brain adaptability.
The broader implications of these findings extend significantly beyond academic achievement, influencing both educational practices and societal outcomes. The diminishing traditional reading practices among children, together with the growing consumption of digital media, brings forward worries regarding literacy development in the future. Reading promotes deep cognitive processing and sustained attention while developing language skills, which serve as foundational elements for both academic achievement and professional advancement. Educators and caregivers, alongside policymakers, should focus on early literacy interventions and structured reading programs to enhance cognitive development and neural functions.
Through neuroimaging and cognitive assessments, professionals can identify children who are at risk early enough to provide timely interventions during their critical developmental phase. Studies conducted over extended periods demonstrate how early literacy programs reduce reading problems and confirm the critical period hypothesis stating that childhood interventions yield the best results. Research should investigate how white matter development responds differently to digital and print reading formats and evaluate the enduring effectiveness of reading interventions among varying socio-economic and linguistic groups.
Reading serves as a critical neurobiological mechanism for brain development, extending well beyond academic learning. Research demonstrates that children achieve better cognitive and neural development when they experience literacy-rich environments alongside early reading exposure and dedicated interventions. In today’s digital society, children need to build consistent reading habits to succeed. Research into the brain mechanisms involved in learning to read will inform the creation of educational policies and interventions that support lifelong literacy and cognitive health.

Author Contributions

Y.P., N.B., B.Y. and Y.Ö. conceived the review and contributed to the study design. Y.P. prepared the initial draft of the manuscript. N.B., B.Y. and Y.Ö. provided critical revisions and conceptual guidance. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors did not receive any external funding for this study.

Informed Consent Statement

We hereby confirm that the present report conforms to the ethical standards and guidelines of the journal.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Cunningham, A.E.; Stanovich, K.E. Assessing print exposure and orthographic processing skill in children: A quick measure of reading experience. J. Educ. Psychol. 1990, 82, 733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Takeuchi, H.; Taki, Y.; Hashizume, H.; Asano, K.; Asano, M.; Sassa, Y.; Kawashima, R. Impact of reading habit on white matter structure: Cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses. Neuroimage 2016, 133, 378–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Ben-Shachar, M.; Dougherty, R.F.; Wandell, B.A. White matter pathways in reading. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2007, 17, 258–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Yeatman, J.D.; Dougherty, R.F.; Ben-Shachar, M.; Wandell, B.A. Development of white matter and reading skills. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, e3045–e3053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Clark, C.; Rumbold, K. Reading for Pleasure: A Research Overview; National Literacy Trust: London, UK, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  6. Dunst, C.J.; Simkus, A.; Hamby, D.W. Relationship between age of onset and frequency of reading and infants’ and toddlers’ early language and literacy development. Cent. Early Lit. Learn. Rev. 2012, 5, 4. [Google Scholar]
  7. Bennett, K.K.; Weigel, D.J.; Martin, S.S. Children’s acquisition of early literacy skills: Examining family contributions. Early Child. Res. Q. 2002, 17, 95–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Evans, M.A.; Shaw, D.; Bell, M. Home literacy activities and their influence on early literacy skills. Can. J. Exp. Psychol. 2000, 54, 65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Mol, S.E.; Bus, A.G.; de Jong, M.T. Interactive Book Reading in Early Education: A Tool to Stimulate Print Knowledge as Well as Oral Language. Rev. Educ. Res. 2009, 79, 979–1007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Pugh, K.R.; Landi, N.; Preston, J.L.; Mencl, W.E.; Austin, A.C.; Sibley, D.; Frost, S.J. The relationship between phonological and auditory processing and brain organization in beginning readers. Brain Lang. 2013, 125, 173–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Rollans, C.; Cheema, K.; Georgiou, G.K.; Cummine, J. Pathways of the inferior frontal occipital fasciculus in overt speech and reading. Neuroscience 2017, 364, 93–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wang, K.; Li, X.; Huang, R.; Ding, J.; Song, L.; Han, Z. The left inferior longitudinal fasciculus supports orthographic processing: Evidence from a lesion-behavior mapping analysis. Brain Lang. 2020, 201, 104721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Saygin, Z.M.; Norton, E.S.; Osher, D.E.; Beach, S.D.; Cyr, A.B.; Ozernov-Palchik, O.; Gabrieli, J.D. Tracking the roots of reading ability: White matter volume and integrity correlate with phonological awareness in prereading and early-reading kindergarten children. J. Neurosci. 2013, 33, 13251–13258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Johnsson-Smaragdi, U.; Jönsson, A. Book Reading in Leisure Time: Long-Term changes in young peoples’ book reading habits. Scand. J. Educ. Res. 2006, 50, 519–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Jabbar, A.; Mahmood, K.; Warraich, N.F. Influence of Family Factors on Children’s Reading Habits: A Review of Literature. Bull. Educ. Res. 2021, 43, 121–144. [Google Scholar]
  16. Su, M.; Schotten, M.T.; Zhao, J.; Song, S.; Zhou, W.; Gong, G. Influences of the early family environment and long-term vocabulary development on the structure of white matter pathways: A longitudinal investigation. Dev. Cogn. Neurosci. 2020, 42, 100767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Mol, S.E.; Bus, A.G. To read or not to read: A meta-analysis of print exposure from infancy to early adulthood. Psychol. Bull. 2011, 137, 267–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Salem, A.A.G.G.; Ferreira da Silva, P.; Felizardo, D.; Holz, M.R.; Fonseca, R.P. Does the frequency of reading and writing habits contribute to executive functions, intelligence, and learning in adolescents with healthy development? Appl. Neuropsychol. Child 2023, 12, 34–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Dylman, A.S.; Blomqvist, E.; Champoux-Larsson, M.F. Reading habits and emotional vocabulary in adolescents. Educ. Psychol. 2020, 40, 681–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Smith, R.; Snow, P.; Serry, T.; Hammond, L. The role of background knowledge in reading comprehension: A critical review. Read. Psychol. 2021, 42, 214–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Giazitzidou, S.; Mouzaki, A.; Padeliadu, S. Pathways from morphological awareness to reading fluency: The mediating role of phonological awareness and vocabulary. Read. Writ. 2024, 37, 1109–1131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zugarramurdi, C.; Fernández, L.; Lallier, M.; Valle-Lisboa, J.C.; Carreiras, M. Mind the orthography: Revisiting the contribution of prereading phonological awareness to reading acquisition. Dev. Psychol. 2022, 58, 1003–1016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Morgan, P.L.; Farkas, G.; Hillemeier, M.M.; Hammer, C.S.; Maczuga, S. 24-month-old children with larger oral vocabularies display greater academic and behavioral functioning at kindergarten entry. Child Dev. 2015, 86, 1351–1370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Arrington, C.N.; Kulesz, P.A.; Juranek, J.; Cirino, P.T.; Fletcher, J.M. White matter microstructure integrity in relation to reading proficiency☆. Brain Lang. 2017, 174, 103–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Reed, A.; Huynh, T.; Ostevik, A.V.; Cheema, K.; Sweneya, S.; Craig, J.; Cummine, J. Phonological, orthographic and morphological skills are related to structural properties of ventral and motor white matter pathways in skilled and impaired readers. Appl. Neuropsychol. Adult 2024, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Travis, K.E.; Leitner, Y.; Feldman, H.M.; Ben-Shachar, M. Cerebellar white matter pathways are associated with reading skills in children and adolescents. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2015, 36, 1536–1553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Liu, T.; Thiebaut de Schotten, M.; Altarelli, I.; Ramus, F.; Zhao, J. Neural dissociation of visual attention span and phonological deficits in developmental dyslexia: A hub-based white matter network analysis. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2022, 43, 5210–5219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Page, M.J.; McKenzie, J.E.; Bossuyt, P.M.; Boutron, I.; Hoffmann, T.C.; Mulrow, C.D.; Moher, D. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021, 372, n71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Shapiro, E.G.; Lipton, M.E.; Krivit, W. White matter dysfunction and its neuropsychological correlates: A longitudinal study of a case of metachromatic leukodystrophy treated with bone marrow transplant. J. Clin. Exp. Neuropsychol. 1992, 14, 610–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Richards, T.L.; Grabowski, T.J.; Boord, P.; Yagle, K.; Askren, M.; Mestre, Z.; Berninger, V. Contrasting brain patterns of writing-related DTI parameters, fMRI connectivity, and DTI–fMRI connectivity correlations in children with and without dysgraphia or dyslexia. NeuroImage Clin. 2015, 8, 408–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Rimrodt, S.L.; Peterson, D.J.; Denckla, M.B.; Kaufmann, W.E.; Cutting, L.E. White matter microstructural differences linked to left perisylvian language network in children with dyslexia. Cortex 2010, 46, 739–749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Skeide, M.A.; Kirsten, H.; Kraft, I.; Schaadt, G.; Müller, B.; Neef, N.; Friederici, A.D. Genetic dyslexia risk variant is related to neural connectivity patterns underlying phonological awareness in children. Neuroimage 2015, 118, 414–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Andrews, J.S.; Ben-Shachar, M.; Yeatman, J.D.; Flom, L.L.; Luna, B.; Feldman, H.M. Reading performance correlates with white-matter properties in preterm and term children. Dev. Med. Child Neurol. 2010, 52, e94–e100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Beaulieu, C.; Plewes, C.; Paulson, L.A.; Roy, D.; Snook, L.; Concha, L.; Phillips, L. Imaging brain connectivity in children with diverse reading ability. Neuroimage 2005, 25, 1266–1271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Dougherty, R.F.; Ben-Shachar, M.; Deutsch, G.K.; Hernandez, A.; Fox, G.R.; Wandell, B.A. Temporal-callosal pathway diffusivity predicts phonological skills in children. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 8556–8561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Gao, Y.; Meng, X.; Bai, Z.; Liu, X.; Zhang, M.; Li, H.; Booth, J.R. Left and right arcuate fasciculi are uniquely related to word reading skills in Chinese-English bilingual children. Neurobiol. Lang. 2022, 3, 109–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Gullick, M.M.; Booth, J.R. The direct segment of the arcuate fasciculus is predictive of longitudinal reading change. Dev. Cogn. Neurosci. 2015, 13, 68–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Gullick, M.M.; Demir-Lira, Ö.E.; Booth, J.R. Reading skill–fractional anisotropy relationships in visuospatial tracts diverge depending on socioeconomic status. Dev. Sci. 2016, 19, 673–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Meisler, S.L.; Gabrieli, J.D. Fiber-specific structural properties relate to reading skills in children and adolescents. Elife 2022, 11, e82088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Yeatman, J.D.; Dougherty, R.F.; Rykhlevskaia, E.; Sherbondy, A.J.; Deutsch, G.K.; Wandell, B.A.; Ben-Shachar, M. Anatomical properties of the arcuate fasciculus predict phonological and reading skills in children. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2011, 23, 3304–3317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Su, M.; Zhao, J.; de Schotten, M.T.; Zhou, W.; Gong, G.; Ramus, F.; Shu, H. Alterations in white matter pathways underlying phonological and morphological processing in Chinese developmental dyslexia. Dev. Cogn. Neurosci. 2018, 31, 11–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zhao, J.; Zhao, Y.; Song, Z.; de Schotten, M.T.; Altarelli, I.; Ramus, F. Adaptive compensation of arcuate fasciculus lateralization in developmental dyslexia. Cortex 2023, 167, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Weiss, Y.; Huber, E.; Ferjan Ramírez, N.; Corrigan, N.M.; Yarnykh, V.L.; Kuhl, P.K. Language input in late infancy scaffolds emergent literacy skills and predicts reading related white matter development. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2022, 16, 922552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Vandermosten, M.; Cuynen, L.; Vanderauwera, J.; Wouters, J.; Ghesquiere, P. White matter pathways mediate parental effects on children’s reading precursors. Brain Lang. 2017, 173, 10–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Brignoni-Pérez, E.; Morales, M.C.; Marchman, V.A.; Scala, M.; Feldman, H.M.; Yeom, K.; Travis, K.E. Listening to Mom in the NICU: Effects of increased maternal speech exposure on language outcomes and white matter development in infants born very preterm. Trials 2021, 22, 444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Lou, C.; Duan, X.; Altarelli, I.; Sweeney, J.A.; Ramus, F.; Zhao, J. White matter network connectivity deficits in developmental dyslexia. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2019, 40, 505–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Walton, M.; Dewey, D.; Lebel, C. Brain white matter structure and language ability in preschool-aged children. Brain Lang. 2018, 176, 19–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. De Moura, L.M.; Cogo-Moreira, H.; De Ávila, C.R.B.; Pan, P.M.; Gadelha, A.; Moriyama, T.; Jackowski, A.P. Children with poor reading skills at the word level show reduced fractional anisotropy in white matter tracts of both hemispheres. Brain Connect. 2016, 6, 519–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Deutsch, G.K.; Dougherty, R.F.; Bammer, R.; Siok, W.T.; Gabrieli, J.D.; Wandell, B. Children’s reading performance is correlated with white matter structure measured by diffusion tensor imaging. Cortex 2005, 41, 354–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Niogi, S.N.; McCandliss, B.D. Left lateralized white matter microstructure accounts for individual differences in reading ability and disability. Neuropsychologia 2006, 44, 2178–2188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Leonard, C.; Eckert, M.; Given, B.; Virginia, B.; Eden, G. Individual differences in anatomy predict reading and oral language impairments in children. Brain 2006, 129, 3329–3342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Cao, F.; Bitan, T.; Booth, J.R. Effective brain connectivity in children with reading difficulties during phonological processing. Brain Lang. 2008, 107, 91–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Odegard, T.N.; Farris, E.A.; Ring, J.; McColl, R.; Black, J. Brain connectivity in non-reading impaired children and children diagnosed with developmental dyslexia. Neuropsychologia 2009, 47, 1972–1977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Frye, R.E.; Liederman, J.; Hasan, K.M.; Lincoln, A.; Malmberg, B.; McLean III, J.; Papanicolaou, A. Diffusion tensor quantification of the relations between microstructural and macrostructural indices of white matter and reading. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2011, 32, 1220–1235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Raschle, N.M.; Chang, M.; Gaab, N. Structural brain alterations associated with dyslexia predate reading onset. Neuroimage 2011, 57, 742–749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Feldman, H.M.; Lee, E.S.; Yeatman, J.D.; Yeom, K.W. Language and reading skills in school-aged children and adolescents born preterm are associated with white matter properties on diffusion tensor imaging. Neuropsychologia 2012, 50, 3348–3362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Myers, C.A.; Vandermosten, M.; Farris, E.A.; Hancock, R.; Gimenez, P.; Black, J.M.; Hoeft, F. Structural changes in white matter are uniquely related to children’s reading development. Psychol. Sci. 2014, 25, 1870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Horowitz-Kraus, T.; Wang, Y.; Plante, E.; Holland, S.K. Involvement of the right hemisphere in reading comprehension: A DTI study. Brain Res. 2014, 1582, 34–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Broce, I.; Bernal, B.; Altman, N.; Tremblay, P.; Dick, A.S. Fiber tracking of the frontal aslant tract and subcomponents of the arcuate fasciculus in 5–8-year-olds: Relation to speech and language function. Brain Lang. 2015, 149, 66–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Travis, K.E.; Ben-Shachar, M.; Myall, N.J.; Feldman, H.M. Variations in the neurobiology of reading in children and adolescents born full term and preterm. NeuroImage Clin. 2016, 11, 555–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Borst, G.; Cachia, A.; Tissier, C.; Ahr, E.; Simon, G.; Houdé, O. Early cerebral constraints on reading skills in school-age children: An MRI study. Mind Brain Educ. 2016, 10, 47–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Travis, K.E.; Adams, J.N.; Kovachy, V.N.; Ben-Shachar, M.; Feldman, H.M. White matter properties differ in 6-year old Readers and Pre-readers. Brain Struct. Funct. 2017, 222, 1685–1703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Mürner-Lavanchy, I.M.; Kelly, C.E.; Reidy, N.; Doyle, L.W.; Lee, K.J.; Inder, T.; Anderson, P.J. White matter microstructure is associated with language in children born very preterm. NeuroImage Clin. 2018, 20, 808–822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Sun, X.; Song, S.; Liang, X.; Xie, Y.; Zhao, C.; Zhang, Y.; Gong, G. ROBO1 polymorphisms, callosal connectivity, and reading skills. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2017, 38, 2616–2626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Horowitz-Kraus, T.; Holland, S.K.; Versace, A.L.; Bertocci, M.A.; Bebko, G.; Almeida, J.R.; Phillips, M.L. Reading related white matter structures in adolescents are influenced more by dysregulation of emotion than behavior. NeuroImage Clin. 2017, 15, 732–740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Wang, Y.; Mauer, M.V.; Raney, T.; Peysakhovich, B.; Becker, B.L.; Sliva, D.D.; Gaab, N. Development of tract-specific white matter pathways during early reading development in at-risk children and typical controls. Cereb. Cortex 2017, 27, 2469–2485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Su, M.; Thiebaut de Schotten, M.; Zhao, J.; Song, S.; Zhou, W.; Gong, G.; Shu, H. Vocabulary growth rate from preschool to school-age years is reflected in the connectivity of the arcuate fasciculus in 14-year-old children. Dev. Sci. 2018, 21, e12647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Banfi, C.; Koschutnig, K.; Moll, K.; Schulte-Körne, G.; Fink, A.; Landerl, K. White matter alterations and tract lateralization in children with dyslexia and isolated spelling deficits. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2019, 40, 765–776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Huber, E.; Henriques, R.N.; Owen, J.P.; Rokem, A.; Yeatman, J.D. Applying microstructural models to understand the role of white matter in cognitive development. Dev. Cogn. Neurosci. 2019, 36, 100624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Dubner, S.E.; Dodson, C.K.; Marchman, V.A.; Ben-Shachar, M.; Feldman, H.M.; Travis, K.E. White matter microstructure and cognitive outcomes in relation to neonatal inflammation in 6-year-old children born preterm. NeuroImage Clin. 2019, 23, 101832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Broce, I.J.; Bernal, B.; Altman, N.; Bradley, C.; Baez, N.; Cabrera, L.; Dick, A.S. Fiber pathways supporting early literacy development in 5–8-year-old children. Brain Cogn. 2019, 134, 80–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Del Tufo, S.N.; Earle, F.S.; Cutting, L.E. The impact of expressive language development and the left inferior longitudinal fasciculus on listening and reading comprehension. J. Neurodev. Disord. 2019, 11, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Vanderauwera, J.; van Setten, E.R.; Maurits, N.M.; Maassen, B.A. The interplay of socio-economic status represented by paternal educational level, white matter structure and reading. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0215560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. De Vos, A.; Vanderauwera, J.; Vanvooren, S.; Vandermosten, M.; Ghesquiere, P.; Wouters, J. The relation between neurofunctional and neurostructural determinants of phonological processing in pre-readers. Dev. Cogn. Neurosci. 2020, 46, 100874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Beaulieu, C.; Yip, E.; Low, P.B.; Mädler, B.; Lebel, C.A.; Siegel, L.; Laule, C. Myelin water imaging demonstrates lower brain myelination in children and adolescents with poor reading ability. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2020, 14, 568395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Geeraert, B.L.; Chamberland, M.; Lebel, R.M.; Lebel, C. Multimodal principal component analysis to identify major features of white matter structure and links to reading. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0233244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Hutton, J.S.; Dudley, J.; Horowitz-Kraus, T.; DeWitt, T.; Holland, S.K. Associations between home literacy environment, brain white matter integrity and cognitive abilities in preschool-age children. Acta Paediatr. 2020, 109, 1376–1386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Bruckert, L.; Travis, K.E.; Mezer, A.A.; Ben-Shachar, M.; Feldman, H.M. Associations of reading efficiency with white matter properties of the cerebellar peduncles in children. Cerebellum 2020, 19, 771–777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Liu, T.; Thiebaut de Schotten, M.; Altarelli, I.; Ramus, F.; Zhao, J. Maladaptive compensation of right fusiform gyrus in developmental dyslexia: A hub-based white matter network analysis. Cortex 2021, 145, 57–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Lou, C.; Cross, A.M.; Peters, L.; Ansari, D.; Joanisse, M.F. Rich-club structure contributes to individual variance of reading skills via feeder connections in children with reading disabilities. Dev. Cogn. Neurosci. 2021, 49, 100957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Van Der Auwera, S.; Vandermosten, M.; Wouters, J.; Ghesquière, P.; Vanderauwera, J. A three-time point longitudinal investigation of the arcuate fasciculus throughout reading acquisition in children developing dyslexia. NeuroImage 2021, 237, 118087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Zuk, J.; Dunstan, J.; Norton, E.; Yu, X.; Ozernov-Palchik, O.; Wang, Y.; Gaab, N. Multifactorial pathways facilitate resilience among kindergarteners at risk for dyslexia: A longitudinal behavioral and neuroimaging study. Dev. Sci. 2021, 24, e12983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Wang, N.Y.H.; Wang, H.L.S.; Liu, Y.C.; Chang, Y.P.E.; Weng, J.C. Investigating the white matter correlates of reading performance: Evidence from Chinese childr en with reading difficulties. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0248434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Koirala, N.; Perdue, M.V.; Su, X.; Grigorenko, E.L.; Landi, N. Neurite density and arborization is associated with reading skill and phonological processing in children. NeuroImage 2021, 241, 118426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Yu, X.; Dunstan, J.; Jacobson, S.W.; Molteno, C.D.; Lindinger, N.M.; Turesky, T.K.; Gaab, N. Distinctive neural correlates of phonological and reading impairment in fetal alcohol-exposed adolescents with and without facial dysmorphology. Neuropsychologia 2022, 169, 108188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Meisler, S.L.; Gabrieli, J.D. A large-scale investigation of white matter microstructural associations with reading ability. NeuroImage 2022, 249, 118909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Ostertag, C.; Reynolds, J.E.; Kar, P.; Dewey, D.; Gibbard, W.B.; Tortorelli, C.; Lebel, C. Arcuate fasciculus and pre-reading language development in children with prenatal alcohol exposure. Front. Neurosci. 2023, 17, 1174165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Harriott, E.M.; Nguyen, T.Q.; Landman, B.A.; Barquero, L.A.; Cutting, L.E. Using a semi-automated approach to quantify Unidentified Bright Objects in Neurofibromatosis type 1 and linkages to cognitive and academic outcomes. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2023, 98, 17–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Vandecruys, F.; Vandermosten, M.; De Smedt, B. The inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus correlates with early precursors of mathematics and reading before the start of formal schooling. Cortex 2024, 174, 149–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Ghasoub, M.; Perdue, M.; Long, X.; Donnici, C.; Dewey, D.; Lebel, C. Structural neural connectivity correlates with pre-reading abilities in preschool children. Dev. Cogn. Neurosci. 2024, 65, 101332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Cross, A.M.; Lammert, J.M.; Peters, L.; Frijters, J.C.; Ansari, D.; Steinbach, K.A.; Joanisse, M.F. White matter correlates of reading subskills in children with and without reading disability. Brain Lang. 2023, 241, 105270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Zhou, Y.; Li, G.; Song, Z.; Zhang, Z.; Huang, H.; Li, H.; Tang, X. Associations between Brain Microstructure and Phonological Processing Ability in Preschool Children. Children 2022, 9, 782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Vandecruys, F.; Vandermosten, M.; De Smedt, B. The role of formal schooling in the development of children’s reading and arithmetic white matter networks. Dev. Sci. 2024, 27, e13557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Manning, K.Y.; Reynolds, J.E.; Long, X.; Llera, A.; Dewey, D.; Lebel, C. Multimodal brain features at 3 years of age and their relationship with pre-reading measures 1 year later. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2022, 16, 965602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Hoeft, F.; McCandliss, B.D.; Black, J.M.; Gantman, A.; Zakerani, N.; Hulme, C.; Gabrieli, J.D. Neural systems predicting long-term outcome in dyslexia. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 361–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Kraft, I.; Schreiber, J.; Cafiero, R.; Metere, R.; Schaadt, G.; Brauer, J.; Skeide, M.A. Predicting early signs of dyslexia at a preliterate age by combining behavioral assessment with structural MRI. Neuroimage 2016, 143, 378–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Vanderauwera, J.; De Vos, A.; Forkel, S.J.; Catani, M.; Wouters, J.; Vandermosten, M.; Ghesquière, P. Neural organization of ventral white matter tracts parallels the initial steps of reading development: A DTI tractography study. Brain Lang. 2018, 183, 32–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Huber, E.; Donnelly, P.M.; Rokem, A.; Yeatman, J.D. Rapid and widespread white matter plasticity during an intensive reading intervention. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 2260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Richards, T.L.; Berninger, V.W.; Yagle, K.; Abbott, R.D.; Peterson, D. Brain’s functional network clustering coefficient changes in response to instruction (RTI) in students with and without reading disabilities: Multi-leveled reading brain’s RTI. Cogent Psychol. 2018, 5, 1424680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Bruckert, L.; Borchers, L.R.; Dodson, C.K.; Marchman, V.A.; Travis, K.E.; Ben-Shachar, M.; Feldman, H.M. White matter plasticity in reading-related pathways differs in children born preterm and at term: A longitudinal analysis. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2019, 13, 139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Borchers, L.R.; Bruckert, L.; Dodson, C.K.; Travis, K.E.; Marchman, V.A.; Ben-Shachar, M.; Feldman, H.M. Microstructural properties of white matter pathways in relation to subsequent reading abilities in children: A longitudinal analysis. Brain Struct. Funct. 2019, 224, 891–905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Partanen, M.; Kim, D.H.; Rauscher, A.; Siegel, L.S.; Giaschi, D.E. White matter but not grey matter predicts change in reading skills after intervention. Dyslexia 2020, 27, 224–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Phan, T.V.; Sima, D.; Smeets, D.; Ghesquière, P.; Wouters, J.; Vandermosten, M. Structural brain dynamics across reading development: A longitudinal MRI study from kindergarten to grade 5. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2021, 42, 4497–4509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Beelen, C.; Blockmans, L.; Wouters, J.; Ghesquiere, P.; Vandermosten, M. Brain-behavior dynamics between the left fusiform and reading. Brain Struct. Funct. 2022, 227, 587–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Davison, K.E.; Zuk, J.; Mullin, L.J.; Ozernov-Palchik, O.; Norton, E.; Gabrieli, J.D.; Gaab, N. Examining shared reading and white matter organization in kindergarten in relation to subsequent language and reading abilities: A longitudinal investigation. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2023, 35, 259–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Ghasoub, M.; Perdue, M.; Long, X.; Donnici, C.; Kar, P.; Gibbard, B.; Lebel, C. The brain’s structural connectivity and pre-reading abilities in young children with prenatal alcohol exposure. Dev. Cogn. Neurosci. 2024, 70, 101467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Lou, C.; Cross, A.M.; Peters, L.; Ansari, D.; Joanisse, M.F. Patterns of the left thalamus embedding into the connectome associated with reading skills in children with reading disabilities. Netw. Neurosci. 2024, 8, 1507–1528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Roy, E.; Richie-Halford, A.; Kruper, J.; Narayan, M.; Bloom, D.; Nedelec, P.; Yeatman, J.D. White matter and literacy: A dynamic system in flux. Dev. Cogn. Neurosci. 2024, 65, 101341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. PRISMA flow diagram for study selection.
Figure 1. PRISMA flow diagram for study selection.
Children 12 00710 g001
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pınar, Y.; Bayat, N.; Yüksel, B.; Özkara, Y. Reading and White Matter Development: A Systematic Review of Neuroplastic Changes in Literacy. Children 2025, 12, 710. https://doi.org/10.3390/children12060710

AMA Style

Pınar Y, Bayat N, Yüksel B, Özkara Y. Reading and White Matter Development: A Systematic Review of Neuroplastic Changes in Literacy. Children. 2025; 12(6):710. https://doi.org/10.3390/children12060710

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pınar, Yunus, Nihat Bayat, Begümhan Yüksel, and Yasin Özkara. 2025. "Reading and White Matter Development: A Systematic Review of Neuroplastic Changes in Literacy" Children 12, no. 6: 710. https://doi.org/10.3390/children12060710

APA Style

Pınar, Y., Bayat, N., Yüksel, B., & Özkara, Y. (2025). Reading and White Matter Development: A Systematic Review of Neuroplastic Changes in Literacy. Children, 12(6), 710. https://doi.org/10.3390/children12060710

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop