Neonatal and Two-Year Prognosis of Eutrophic Newborns from Monochorionic Diamniotic Twin Pregnancies Complicated by Selective Intrauterine Growth Restriction
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Population
2.2. Study Objectives
2.3. Perinatal and Neonatal Data
2.4. Development at 2 Years
2.5. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Perinatal Characteristics of the Population
3.2. Neonatal Assessment
3.3. Neurodevelopmental Assessment at 2 Years
3.4. Comparison Between the Eutrophic Twin and the IUGR Co-Twin
Neonatal Data
3.5. ASQ at 2 Years
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Bennasar, M.; Eixarch, E.; Martinez, J.M.; Gratacós, E. Selective intrauterine growth restriction in monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancies. Semin. Fetal Neonatal Med. 2017, 22, 376–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Leduc, L.; Takser, L.; Rinfret, D. Persistence of adverse obstetric and neonatal outcomes in monochorionic twins after exclusion of disorders unique to monochorionic placentation. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2005, 193, 1670–1675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ananth, C.V.; Chauhan, S.P. Epidemiology of twinning in developed countries. Semin. Perinatol. 2012, 36, 156–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Blondel, B. Increase in twin maternities and consequences on health. J. Gynecol. Obstet. Biol. Reprod. 2009, 38, S7–S17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chauhan, S.; Scardo, J.; Hayes, E.; Abuhamad, A.Z.; Berghella, V. Twins: Prevalence, problems, and preterm births. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2010, 203, 305–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ingram Cooke, R. Does neonatal and infant neurodevelopmental morbidity of multiples and singletons differ? Semin. Fetal Neonatal Med. 2010, 15, 362–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ray, B.; Platt, M. Mortality of twins and singleton livebirths under 30 weeks gestation: A population-based study. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2009, 94, F140–F143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Corsello, G.; Piro, E. The world of twins: An update. J. Matern. Fetal Neonatal Med. 2010, 23, 59–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bonellie, S.R.; Currie, D.; Chalmers, J. Comparison of risk factors for cerebral palsy in twins and singletons. Dev. Med. Child. Neurol. 2005, 47, 587–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guellec, I.; Lapillonne, A.; Marret, S.; Picaud, J.C.; Mitanchez, D.; Charkaluk, M.L.; Fresson, J.; Arnaud, C.; Flamand, C.; Cambonie, G.; et al. Effect of intra- and extrauterine growth on long term neurologic outcomes of very preterm infants. J. Pediatr. 2016, 175, 93–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bodeau-Livinec, F.; Zeitlin, J.; Blondel, B.; Arnaud, C.; Fresson, J.; Burguet, A.; Subtil, D.; Marret, S.; Rozé, J.C.; Marchand-Martin, L.; et al. Do very preterm twins and singletons differ in their neurodevelopment at 5 years of age? Arch. Dis. Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2013, 98, F480–F487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hack, K.; Derks, J.; Elias, S.; Franx, A.; Roos, E.J.; Voerman, S.K.; Bode, C.L.; Koopman-Esseboom, C.; Visser, G.H.A. Increased perinatal mortality and morbidity in monochorionic versus dichorionic twin pregnancies: Clinical implications of a large Dutch cohort study. BJOG 2008, 115, 58–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Acostas-Rojas, R.; Becker, J.; Munoz-Abellana, B.; Ruiz, C.; Carreras, E.; Gratacos, E.; Catalunya and Balears Monochorionic Network. Twin chorionicity and the risk of adverse perinatal outcome. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. 2007, 96, 98–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kawamura, H.; Ishii, K.; Yonetani, N.; Mabuchi, A.; Hayashi, S.; Mitsuda, N. Significance of chorionicity on long-term outcome of low birthweight infants of <1500g in twin pregnancies. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Res. 2015, 41, 1185–1192. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Hack, K.; Koopman-Esseboom, C.; Derks, J.; Elias, S.G.; de Kleine, M.J.; Baerts, W.; Go, A.T.J.I.; Schaap, A.H.P.; van der Hoeven, M.A.H.B.M.; Eggink, A.J.; et al. Long-term neurodevelopmental outcome of monochorionic and matched dichorionic twins. PLoS ONE 2009, 28, e6815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ichinomiya, K.; Maruyama, K.; Koizumi, A.; Inoue, F.; Fukuda, K.; Kaburagi, K.; Miyakawa, Y. Comparaison of neurodevelopmental outcomes between monochorionic and dichorionic twins with birth weight ≤ 1500 g in Japan: A register-based cohort study. J. Perinatol. 2018, 38, 1407–1413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fick, A.L.; Feldstein, V.A.; Norton, M.E.; Wassel Fyr, C.; Caughey, A.B.; Machin, G.A. Unequal placental sharing and birth weight discordance in monochorionic diamniotic twins. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2006, 195, 178–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chang, Y.; Chang, S.; Chao, A.; Hsieh, P.C.C.; Wang, C.; Wang, T. Clinical outcome and placental territory ratio of monochorionic twin pregnancies and selective intrauterine growth restriction with different types of umbilical artery Doppler. Prenat. Diagn. 2009, 29, 253–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Russell, Z.; Quintero, R.A.; Kontopoulos, E.V. Intrauterine growth restriction in monochorionic twins. Semin. Fetal Neonatal Med. 2007, 12, 439–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lopriore, E.; Sluimers, C.; Pasman, S.A.; Middeldorp, J.M.; Oepkes, D.; Walther, F.J. Neonatal Morbidity in Growth-Discordant Monochorionic Twins: Comparison Between the Larger and the Smaller Twin. Twin Res. Hum. Genet. 2012, 15, 541–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Denbow, M.L.; Cox, P.; Taylor, M.; Hammal, D.M.; Fisk, N.M. Placental angioarchitecture in monochorionic twin pregnancies: Relationship to fetal growth, fetofetal transfusion syndrome, and pregnancy outcome. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2000, 182, 417–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lewi, L.; Deprest, J.; Hecher, K. The vascular anastomoses in monochorionic twin pregnancies and their clinical consequences. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2013, 208, 19–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gratacós, E.; Lewi, L.; Muñoz, B.; Acosta-Rojas, R.; Hernandez-Andrade, E.; Martinez, J.M.; Carreras, E.; Deprest, J. A classification system for selective intrauterine growth restriction in monochorionic pregnancies according to umbilical artery Doppler flow in the smaller twin. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2007, 30, 28–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tollenaar, L.S.A.; Lopriore, E.; Slaghekke, F.; Oepkes, D.; Middeldorp, J.M.; Haak, M.C.; Klumper, F.J.C.M.; Tan, R.N.G.B.; Rijken, M.; Van Klink, J.M.M. High risk of long-term neurodevelopmental impairment in donor twins with spontaneous twin anemia–polycythemia sequence. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2020, 55, 39–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Graef, C.; Ellenrieder, B.; Hecher, K.; Hackeloer, B.J.; Huber, A.; Bartmann, P. Long-term neurodevelopmental outcome of 167 children after intrauterine laser treatment for severe twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2006, 194, 303–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Prasad, S.; Beg, S.; Badran, D.; Masciullo, L.; Huddy, C.; Khalil, A. Neurodevelopmental outcome in complicated twin pregnancy: Prospective observational study. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2024, 63, 189–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Buca, D.; Pagani, G.; Rizzo, G.; Familiari, A.; Flacco, M.E.; Manzoli, L.; Liberati, M.; Fanfani, F.; Scambia, G.; D’Antonio, F. Outcome of monochorionic twin pregnancy with selective intrauterine growth restriction according to umbilical artery Doppler flow pattern of smaller twin: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2017, 50, 559–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vedel, C.; Oldenburg, A.; Worda, K.; Larsen, H.; Holmskov, A.; Andreasen, K.R.; Uldbjerg, N.; Ramb, J.; Bødker, B.; Skibsted, L.; et al. Short- and long-term perinatal outcome in twin pregnancies affected by weight discordance. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 2017, 96, 233–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khalil, A.; Beune, I.; Hecher, K.; Wynia, K.; Ganzevoort, W.; Reed, K.; Lewi, L.; Oepkes, D.; Gratacos, E.; Thilaganathan, B.; et al. Consensus definition and essential reporting parameters of selective fetal growth restriction in twin pregnancy: A Delphi procedure. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2019, 53, 47–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gratacós, E.; Lewi, L.; Carreras, E.; Becker, J.; Higueras, T.; Deprest, J.; Cabero, L. Incidence and characteristics of umbilical artery intermittent absent and/or reversed end-diastolic flow in complicated and uncomplicated monochorionic twin pregnancies. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2004, 23, 456–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Inklaar, M.J.; Van Klink, J.M.M.; Stolk, T.T.; Van Zwet, E.W.; Oepkes, D.; Lopriore, E. Cerebral injury in monochorionic twins with selective intrauterine growth restriction: A systematic review. Prenat. Diagn. 2014, 34, 205–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ishii, K.; Murakoshi, T.; Takahashi, Y.; Shinno, T.; Matsushita, M.; Naruse, H.; Torii, Y.; Sumie, M.; Nakata, M. Perinatal outcome of monochorionic twins with selective intrauterine growth restriction and different types of umbilical artery Doppler under expectant management. Fetal Diagn. Ther. 2009, 26, 157–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Quintero, R.A.; Bornick, P.W.; Morales, W.J.; Allen, M.H. Selective photocoagulation of communicating vessels in the treatment of monochorionic twins with selective growth retardation. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2001, 185, 689–696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Knijnenburg, P.J.C.; Lopriore, E.; Slaghekke, F.; Van Klink, J.M.M. Long-term follow-up of complicated monochorionic twin pregnancies: Focus on neurodevelopment. Best. Pract. Res. Clin. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2022, 84, 166–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rustico, M.A.; Consonni, D.; Lanna, M.; Faiola, S.; Schena, V.; Scelsa, B.; Introvini, P.; Righini, A.; Parazzini, C.; Lista, G.; et al. Selective intrauterine growth restriction in monochorionic twins: Changing patterns in umbilical artery Doppler flow and outcomes. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2017, 49, 387–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mercier, J.; Gremillet, L.; Netter, A.; Chau, C.; Gire, C.; Tosello, B. Neonatal and Long-Term Prognosis of Monochorionic Diamniotic Pregnancies Complicated by Selective Growth Restriction. Children 2022, 9, 708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vayssière, C.; Sentilhes, L.; Ego, A.; Bernard, C.; Cambourieu, D.; Flamant, C.; Gascoin, G.; Gaudineau, A.; Grangé, G.; Houfflin-Debarge, V.; et al. Fetal growth restriction and intra-uterine growth restriction: Guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynecologists and Obstetricians. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2015, 193, 10–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Papile, L.A.; Burstein, J.; Burstein, R.; Koffler, H. Incidence and evolution of subependymal and intraventricular hemorrhage: A study of infants with birth weights less than 1,500 g. J. Pediatr. 1978, 92, 529–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bell, M.; Ternberg, J.; Feigin, R.; Keating, J.P.; Marshall, R.; Barton, L.; Brotherton, T. Neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis: Therapeutic decisions based upon clinical staging. Ann. Surg. 1978, 187, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- International Committee for the Classification of Retinopathy of Prematurity. The international classification of retinopathy of prematurity revisited. Arch. Ophthalmol. 2005, 123, 991–999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jobe, A. The new bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Curr. Opin. Pediatr. 2011, 23, 167–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Squires, J.; Bricker, D.; Potter, L. Revision of a Parent-Completed Developmental Screening Tool: Ages and Stages Questionnaires. J. Pediatr. Psychol. 1997, 22, 313–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hoarau, D.; Tosello, B.; Blanc, J.; Lorthe, E.; Foix-L’helias, L.; D’ercole, C.; Winer, N.; Subtil, D.; Goffinet, F.; Kayem, G.; et al. Chorionicity and neurodevelopmental outcomes at 5½ years among twins born preterm: The EPIPAGE2 cohort study. BJOG Int. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2023, 130, 1047–1058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tosello, B.; Garbi, A.; Blanc, J.; Lorthe, E.; Foix-L’helias, L.; D’ercole, C.; Winer, N.; Subtil, D.; Goffinet, F.; Kayem, G.; et al. The impact of chorionicity on pregnancy outcome and neurodevelopment at 2 years old among twins born preterm: The EPIPAGE-2 cohort study. BJOG Int. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2021, 128, 281–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wintermark, P. The role of brain MRI scanning in the newborn. Paediatr. Child. Health. 2012, 22, 155–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rutherford, M.; Pennock, J.; Schwieso, J.; Cowan, F.; Dubowitz, L. Hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy: Early and late magnetic resonance imaging findings in relation to outcome. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1996, 75, F145–F151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rutherford, M.; Biarge, M.M.; Allsop, J.; Counsell, S.; Cowan, F. MRI of perinatal brain injury. Pediatr. Radiol. 2010, 40, 819–833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Troude, P.; Squires, J.; L’Helias, L.F.; Bouyer, J.; de La Rochebrochard, E. Ages and stages questionnaires: Feasibility of postal surveys for child follow-up. Early Hum. Dev. 2011, 87, 671–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Agarwal, P.K.; Shi, L.; Daniel, L.M.; Yang, P.H.; Khoo, P.C.; Quek, B.H.; Zheng, Q.; Rajadurai, V.S. Prospective evaluation of the Ages and Stages Questionnaire 3rd Edition in very-low-birthweight infants. Dev. Med. Child. Neurol. 2017, 59, 484–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Agarwal, P.K.; Xie, H.; Sathyapalan Rema, A.S.; Rajadurai, V.S.; Lim, S.B.; Meaney, M.; Daniel, L.M. Evaluation of the Ages and Stages Questionnaire (ASQ 3) as a developmental screener at 9, 18, and 24 months. Early Hum. Dev. 2020, 147, 105081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pierrat, V.; Marchand-Martin, L.; Arnaud, C.; Kaminski, M.; Resche-Rigon, M.; Lebeaux, C.; Bodeau-Livinec, F.; Morgan, A.S.; Goffinet, F.; Marret, S.; et al. Neurodevelopmental outcome at 2 years for preterm children born at 22 to 34 weeks’ gestation in France in 2011: EPIPAGE-2 cohort study. BMJ 2017, 358, j3448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- von Stumm, S.; Plomin, R. Socioeconomic status and the growth of intelligence from infancy through adolescence. Intelligence 2015, 48, 30–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Noble, K.G.; McCandliss, B.D.; Farah, M.J. Socioeconomic gradients predict individual differences in neurocognitive abilities. Dev. Sci. 2007, 10, 464–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Brock, C.O.; Bergh, E.P.; Johnson, A.; Ruano, R.; Hernandez-Andrade, E.; Papanna, R. The Delphi definition for selective fetal growth restriction may not improve detection of pathologic growth discordance in monochorionic twins. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. MFM 2022, 4, 100561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
sIUGR Group | Uncomplicated Group | p Value | |
---|---|---|---|
Number of pregnancies, n | 57 | 135 | |
Age, years, median (min–max) | 30.9 (20.2–44.3) | 29.9 (18.7–44.3) | 0.75 |
Gravidity, n, median (min–max) | 2 (1–10) | 2 (1–10) | 0.92 |
Parity, n, median (min–max) | 1 (0–4) | 1 (0–8) | 0.26 |
BMI, kg/m2, median (min–max) | 22.4 (16.4–43.0) | 24.1 (16.3–45.0) | 0.08 |
Fetal sex, n (%) | |||
Male | 28 (49%) | 75 (56%) | 0.27 |
Female | 29 (51%) | 60 (44%) | |
Antenatal corticosteroid therapy, n (%) | |||
Not administered | 11 (19%) | 70 (52%) | <0.001 |
Incomplete | 0 (0%) | 4 (3%) | |
Complete | 46 (81%) | 61 (45%) | |
Mode of delivery, n (%) | |||
Vaginal delivery | 9 (16%) | 68 (50%) | <0.001 |
Cesarean section | 48 (84%) | 67 (50%) | |
Indication for delivery, n (%) | |||
Spontaneous | 13 | 62 | |
Abnormal fetal heart rate | 24 | 3 | |
Doppler abnormalities | 15 | 3 | |
Growth restriction | 12 | 7 | |
Other | 5 | 41 | |
Gestational age at birth, weeks of amenorrhea, median (min–max) | 33 (25–38) | 36 (24–39) | <0.001 |
Number of newborns, n | 114 | 270 | |
Birth weight, grams, mean ± SD | 1914 ± 473 | 2306 ± 576 | <0.001 |
Head circumference at birth, centimeters, mean ± SD | 29 ± 2 | 31 ± 3 | 0.001 |
Birth length, centimeters, mean ± SD | 42 ± 3 | 44 ± 4 | 0.001 |
Growth discordance at birth, %, mean ± SD | 26 ± 10.4 | 7.8 ± 5.3 | <0.001 |
Birth weight percentile, %, mean ± SD | 44.3 ± 32 | 38.3 ± 25 | 0.69 |
Apgar score, median, (min–max) | |||
1 min | 9 (0–10) | 10 (0–10) | 0.24 |
5 min | 9 (5–10) | 10 (3–10) | 0.06 |
10 min | 10 (8–10) | 10 (5–10) | 0.003 |
Apgar score < 7, n/N (%) | |||
1 min | 8/57 (14%) | 41/270 (15%) | 0.7 |
5 min | 4/57 (7%) | 14/270 (5%) | 0.7 |
10 min | 0/57 (0%) | 1/270 (0.3%) | 0.25 |
pH at birth, median, (min–max) | 7.34 (7.2–7.4) | 7.31 (7.0–7.5) | 0.003 |
pH < 7.15, n/N (%) | 0/49 | 16/258 (6%) | 0.06 |
Lactate levels at birth, mmol/L, median, (min–max) | 2.3 (1.3–6.5) | 2.9 (1.0–10.0) | 0.06 |
sIUGR Group | Uncomplicated Group | p Value Adjusted * | |
---|---|---|---|
Hospitalization in intensive care, n/N (%) | 36/57 (63%) | 66/270 (24%) | <0.001 |
Length of hospital stay, days, median (min–max) | 4.5 (1–70) | 4 (1–39) | 0.51 |
Death, n/N (%) | 2/57 (4%) | 7/270 (3%) | 0.81 |
Age at death, days, median (min–max) | 14 (3–25) | 7 (4–13) | |
Respiratory complications: | |||
Need for ventilatory support, n/N (%) | 39/57 (68%) | 69/270 (26%) | <0.001 |
Duration of ventilatory support, days, median (min–max) | 6 (1–71) | 5.5 (1–55) | 0.99 |
Hyaline membrane disease, n/N (%) | 33/57 (58%) | 64/270 (24%) | 0.02 |
Bronchopulmonary dysplasia, n/N (%) | 3/57 (5%) | 7/270 (3%) | 0.34 |
Sepsis, n/N (%) | 5/55 (9%) | 9/187 (5%) | 0.29 |
Early-onset sepsis, n/N (%) | 0/55 (0%) | 5/187 (3%) | |
Late-onset sepsis, n/N (%) | 5/55 (9 %) | 4/185 (2%) | |
Necrotizing enterocolitis, n/N (%) | 4/57 (7%) | 6/270 (2%) | 0.22 |
Abnormal Auditory Evoked Potentials, n/N (%) | 1/31 (3%) | 6/95 (6%) | 0.34 |
Abnormal indirect ophthalmoscopy, n/N (%) | 3/19 (16%) | 6/35 (17%) | 0.92 |
Abnormal electroencephalogram, n/N (%) | 6/43 (14%) | 3/67 (4%) | 0.23 |
Abnormal brain MRI, n/N (%) | 9/16 (56%) | 9/23 (39%) | 0.32 |
Grade III or IV IVH, n/N (%) | 1/16 (6%) | 1/23 (4%) | 0.52 |
PVL, n/N (%) | 2/16 (13%) | 0/23 (0%) | 0.05 |
Ventricular dilation, n/N (%) | 2/16 (13%) | 1/23 (4%) | 0.52 |
Breastfeeding at discharge, n/N (%) | 34/53 (64%) | 98/179 (55%) | 0.22 |
Composite morbidity and mortality criterion, n/N (%) (including neonatal death, grade III or IV IVH, PVL, BPD, and stage II or III NEC) | 6/57 (11%) | 14/270 (5%) | 0.18 |
sIUGR Group N = 38 | Uncomplicated Group N = 67 | p Value | |
---|---|---|---|
Age, years, median (min–max) | 31 (22–40) | 30 (19–44) | 0.60 |
Gravidity, n, median (min–max) | 2 (1–5) | 3 (1–7) | 0.04 |
Parity, n, median (min–max) | 1 (0–4) | 1 (0–3) | 0.19 |
BMI, kg/m2, median (min–max) | 21.3 (17.4–43) | 24 (16.3–45) | 0.02 |
Fetal sex, n (%) | 0.12 | ||
Male | 18 | 40 | |
Female | 20 | 27 | |
Antenatal corticosteroid therapy, n (%) | |||
Not administered | 8 | 36 | 0.002 |
Incomplete | 0 | 0 | |
Complete | 30 | 31 | |
Mode delivery, n (%) | <0.001 | ||
Vaginal delivery | 6/38 (16%) | 37/67 (55%) | |
Cesarean section | 32/38 (84%) | 30/67 (45%) | |
Indication for birth, n (%) | |||
Spontaneous | 9 | 30 | |
Abnormal fetal heart rate | 16 | 1 | |
Doppler abnormalities | 12 | 3 | |
Growth restriction | 8 | 3 | |
Other | 3 | 24 | |
Gestational age at birth, weeks of amenorrhea, median (min–max) | 34 (26–35) | 36 (27–37) | <0.001 |
Birth weight, grams, mean SD | 1986 ± 456 | 2384 ± 519 | <0.001 |
Number of newborns, n | 38 | 134 | |
Head circumference at birth, centimeters, mean SD | 30 ± 1.8 | 31.4 ± 2.3 | 0.002 |
Length at birth, centimeters, mean SD | 42.5 ± 3.2 | 44.7 ± 3.5 | 0.006 |
Growth discordance at birth, %, mean SD | 25 ± 27 | 6 ± 7 | <0.001 |
Birth weight percentile, %, mean SD | 26.5 ± 12 | 36.7 ± 24.5 | 0.55 |
Apgar score, median, (min–max) | |||
1 min | 9 (0–10) | 9.5 (0–10) | 0.12 |
5 min | 10 (5–10) | 10 (6–10) | 0.11 |
10 min | 10 (8–10) | 10 (7–10) | 0.004 |
Apgar score < 7, n/N (%) | |||
1 min | 3 | 18 | 0.3 |
5 min | 3 | 5 | 0.23 |
10 min | 0 | 0 | 1 |
pH at birth, median, (min–max) | 7.34 (7.19–7.4) | 7.3 (7.03–7.5) | 0.002 |
PH < 7.15, n/N (%) | 0 | 11 | 0.06 |
Lactate at birth, mmol/L, median, (min–max) | 2.3 (1.3–5.5) | 2.9 (1–6.9) | 0.15 |
sIUGR Group | Uncomplicated Group | Adjusted p Value ** | |
---|---|---|---|
ASQ score | |||
Median (IQR) | 252 (226–264) | 240 (220–260) | 0.26 |
ASQ < 220, n (%) | 8/38 (21%) | 33/134 (25%) | 0.65 |
ASQ < threshold, n (%) * | 11/38 (29%) | 47/134 (35%) | 0.51 |
Number of impaired domains, n (%) | 0.32 | ||
0 | 32 (80%) | 92 (69%) | |
1 | 6 (15%) | 30 (22%) | |
2 | 1 (3%) | 12 (9%) | |
3 | 1 (3%) | 0 (0%) | |
4 or 5 | 0 | 0 | |
At least one impaired domain, n (%) | 8/38 (21%) | 42/134 (31%) | 0.21 |
By domain, n (%) | |||
Communication | 4/38 (11%) | 19/134 (14%) | 0.59 |
Gross motor skills | 1/38 (3%) | 5/134 (4%) | 0.68 |
Fine motor skills | 1/38 (3%) | 6/134 (4%) | 0.44 |
Problem solving | 1/38 (3%) | 0/134 (0%) | 0.21 |
Social skills | 4/38 (11%) | 24/134 (18%) | 0.30 |
26–31 Weeks GA | 32–34 Weeks GA | >35 Weeks GA | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
sIUGR Group | Uncomplicated Group | p Value | sIUGR Group | Uncomplicated Group | p Value | sIUGR Group | Uncomplicated Group | p Value | |
ASQ score, median (IQR) | 250 (220–264) | 240 (230–250) | 0.37 | 245 (219–262) | 232 (209–245) | 0.5 | 260 (242–265) | 240 (220–261) | 0.09 |
ASQ < 220, n (%) | 3/10 (30%) | 2/10 (20%) | 0.84 | 4/16 (25%) | 7/24 (29%) | 0.92 | 1/12 (8 %) | 24/100 (24%) | 0.17 |
ASQ < threshold, n (%) | 3/10 (30%) | 2/10 (20%) | 0.84 | 5/16 (31%) | 13/24 (54%) | 0.15 | 1/11 (8%) | 24/100 (24%) | 0.17 |
Number of impaired domains, n (%) | |||||||||
0 | 9 (90%) | 10 (100%) | 1 | 12 (75%) | 13 (54%) | 0.78 | 9 (75%) | 69 (69%) | 0.38 |
1 | 1 (10%) | 0 | 2 (13%) | 9 (38%) | 3 (25%) | 21 (21%) | |||
2 | 0 | 0 | 1 (6%) | 2 (8%) | 0 | 10 (10%) | |||
3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
4 or 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
At least one impaired domain, n (%) | 1/10 (10%) | 0/10 (0%) | 0.49 | 4/16 (25%) | 11/24 (46%) | 0.15 | 3/12 (25%) | 31/100 (31%) | 0.57 |
Communication | 1 | 0 | 0.49 | 2/16 (13%) | 4/24 | 0.68 | 1/12 | 15/100 | 0.66 |
Gross motor skills | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1/16 (6%) | 3/24 | 0.64 | 0/12 | 2/100 | 0.88 |
Fine motor skills | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0/16 | 1/24 | 1 | 1/12 | 6/100 | 0.94 |
Problem-solving | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1/16 (6%) | 0/24 | 0.36 | 1/12 | 1/100 | 1 |
Social and individual aptitudes | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3/16 (19%) | 6/24 | 0.71 | 1/12 | 18/100 | 0.37 |
Eutrophic Twin | IUGR Twin | p Value | |
---|---|---|---|
Hospitalization in intensive care, n/N (%) | 36/57 (63%) | 30/57 (53%) | 0.35 |
Duration in intensive care, days, median (min–max) | 4.5 (1–70) | 5 (1–63) | 0.75 |
Duration of hospitalization, days, median (min–max) | 25 (0–113) | 23 (3–113) | 0.96 |
Death, n/N (%) | 2/57 (4%) | 4/57 (7%) | 0.24 |
Age at death, days, median (min–max) | 14 (3–25) | 14.5 (6–100) | |
Respiratory complications: | |||
Need for ventilatory support, n/N (%) | 39/57 (68%) | 34/57 (60%) | 0.44 |
Duration of ventilatory support, days, median (min–max) | 6 (1–71) | 6 (1–86) | 0.46 |
Hyaline membrane disease, n/N (%) | 33/57 (58%) | 26/57 (46%) | 0.18 |
Bronchopulmonary dysplasia, n/N (%) | 3/57 (5%) | 4/57 (7%) | 0.85 |
Infectious complications | |||
Sepsis, n/N (%) | 5/55 (9%) | 7/54 (13%) | 0.5 |
Early-onset, n/N (%) | 0 | 0 | |
Late-onset, n/N (%) | 5 | 7 | |
Necrotizing enterocolitis, n/N (%) | 0.37 | ||
Stage I, n/N (%) | 4/57 (7%) | 8/57 (14%) | |
Stage II, n/N (%) | 1 | 3 | |
Stage III, n/N (%) | 3 | 3 | |
Stage IV, n/N (%) | 0 | 2 | |
Neurosensory complications: | |||
Auditory evoked potential abnormalities, n/N (%) | 1/31 (3%) | 1/34 (3%) | 0.71 |
Fundus abnormalities, n/N (%) | 3/19 (16%) | 2/17 (12%) | 0.72 |
Electroencephalogram abnormalities, n/N (%) | 6/43 (13%) | 2/46 (4%) | 0.12 |
Abnormalities on brain MRI, n/N (%) | 9/16 (56%) | 3/18 (17%) | 0.001 |
IVH grade III or IV, n/N (%) | 1/16 (6%) | 0/18 (0%) | 0.17 |
PVL, n/N (%) | 2/16 (13%) | 1/18 (6%) | 0.47 |
Ventricular dilation, n/N (%) | 2/16 (13%) | 0/18 (0%) | 0.09 |
Composite morbidity–mortality criterion, n/N (%) (including neonatal death, grade III or IV IVH, PVL, BPD and stage II or III NEC) | 6/57 (11%) | 9/57 (16%) | 0.58 |
Eutrophic N = 38 | IUGR N = 19 | p Value | |
---|---|---|---|
ASQ score | |||
Median (IQR) | 255 (229–270) | 245 (212–260) | 0.53 |
ASQ < 220, n (%) | 8/38 (21%) | 6/19 (32%) | 0.70 |
ASQ < threshold, n (%) | 11/38 (29%) | 8/19 (42%) | 0.60 |
Number of impaired domains, n (%) | 0.55 | ||
0 | 30 | 12 (6%) | |
1 | 6 | 5 (26%) | |
2 | 1 | 2 (11%) | |
3 | 1 | 0 | |
4 or 5 | 0 | 0 | |
At least one altered domain, n (%) | 8/38 (21%) | 7/19 (37%) | 0.38 |
By domain, n (%) | |||
Communication | 4 | 5 | |
Gross motor skills | 1 | 1 | |
Fine motor skills | 1 | 0 | |
Problem-solving | 1 | 0 | |
Social and individual aptitudes | 4 | 3 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Jarry, M.-A.; Topalian, N.; Cosnard, L.; D’Ercole, C.; Chau, C.; Tosello, B. Neonatal and Two-Year Prognosis of Eutrophic Newborns from Monochorionic Diamniotic Twin Pregnancies Complicated by Selective Intrauterine Growth Restriction. Children 2025, 12, 615. https://doi.org/10.3390/children12050615
Jarry M-A, Topalian N, Cosnard L, D’Ercole C, Chau C, Tosello B. Neonatal and Two-Year Prognosis of Eutrophic Newborns from Monochorionic Diamniotic Twin Pregnancies Complicated by Selective Intrauterine Growth Restriction. Children. 2025; 12(5):615. https://doi.org/10.3390/children12050615
Chicago/Turabian StyleJarry, Marie-Anne, Nayri Topalian, Lauréline Cosnard, Claude D’Ercole, Cécile Chau, and Barthélémy Tosello. 2025. "Neonatal and Two-Year Prognosis of Eutrophic Newborns from Monochorionic Diamniotic Twin Pregnancies Complicated by Selective Intrauterine Growth Restriction" Children 12, no. 5: 615. https://doi.org/10.3390/children12050615
APA StyleJarry, M.-A., Topalian, N., Cosnard, L., D’Ercole, C., Chau, C., & Tosello, B. (2025). Neonatal and Two-Year Prognosis of Eutrophic Newborns from Monochorionic Diamniotic Twin Pregnancies Complicated by Selective Intrauterine Growth Restriction. Children, 12(5), 615. https://doi.org/10.3390/children12050615