2. Materials and Methods
The study was conducted in June 2024 in two elementary schools, “Srbija” and “Pale Elementary School”, located in Pale, Republika Srpska, Bosnia and Herzegovina. All of the students were tested by pre-trained personnel. Height and weight measurements were taken individually to ensure privacy, particularly since obese adolescents may experience anxiety and concern about their peers’ opinions. Height and weight were measured using the SECA 769 scale, which includes a movable stadiometer for measuring height.
2.1. Participants
The research sample consisted of 260 early adolescents, mean age 12.72 ± 1.06 years(Mean ± Std.Dev.), comprising 6th, 7th, 8th, and 9th graders from two primary schools in the Municipality of Pale. The gender distribution of the sample was nearly equal, with 50.8% male participants (132 individuals) and 49.2% female participants (128 individuals). The majority of the adolescents in the sample were born in 2011, representing 32.7% of the total. This was followed by adolescents born in 2012 (26.9%) and 2010 (22.7%). The smallest percentage of adolescents were born in 2009, accounting for just 0.8%. Additionally, 1.2% of the sample did not provide their birth year.
The sample selection was random, with no stratified selection of participants performed. The written consent of the parents/participants’ guardians was obtained prior the study.
The researchers obtained permission from the Ethics Commission of the Faculty of Physical Education and Sports, University of East Sarajevo, to conduct the study (number 1083/24), as well as parental consent.
Only participants aged between 11 and 15, who provided signed consent from both themselves and their parents or guardians and who were willing to complete questionnaires assessing sociodemographic factors, emotional states, physical activity levels, and eating habits (including the DASS-21 and Physical Activity & Nutrition Behaviors Monitoring Form), were included in the study.
2.2. Instruments
The instruments used in this research included questionnaires designed to assess sociodemographic factors, emotional states, physical activity levels, and eating habits. Regarding the assessment of socioeconomic status, participants provided responses to questions about the number of members in their households, household income, and household expenses. This information is essential to understanding the socioeconomic circumstances that may affect adolescents’ well-being.
To evaluate depression, anxiety, and stress, the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scales by [
48] and adapted by [
49] were used.
For assessing physical activity and nutritional habits, the standardized and non-modified Physical Activity & Nutrition Behaviors Monitoring Form [
50] was utilized (available at [
51]), after being translated for research purposes. The nutritional status of each participant was determined based on BMI percentiles. The paper includes BMI categories classified according to percentiles on the CDC growth charts, defined as follows: 1. Below the 5th percentile—underweight; 2. 5th to 85th percentile—normal, healthy weight; 3- 85th to 95th percentile—overweight; 4. Above the 95th percentile—obesity [
3].
Body Fat Percentage (BF%) and Basal Metabolic Rate (BMR) were calculated using the following formulas [
3]:
The evaluation team consisted of trained professionals. The data collectors agreed on standard procedures for presenting information to children and their parents, in collaboration with the school counselor. This approach was crucial, given the seriousness of the topic, and allowed for effective communication tailored to the students’ ages. Additionally, standardized methods were used to minimize variations in the interpretation of questions and increase the reliability of the results. These measures ensured not only the validity of the collected data but also adherence to ethical research standards. The participants were evaluated in two sessions, each lasting 45 min, with questionnaires completed by the parents.
Regarding the assessment of height and weight, we emphasize that parents were responsible for reporting these data for their children. To ensure the accuracy and validity of the results, we provided accompanying material in the form of a “training letter.” This material contained clear instructions on properly measuring height and weight, along with recommendations for using standardized measurement methods. This approach allowed parents to provide the most accurate data possible, thereby enhancing the reliability of our research.
2.3. Statistical Analysis
SPSS software (SPSS version 24.0, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used for statistical analysis. Initially, the samples were checked for normality of distribution using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. All samples followed a normal distribution (p > 0.05). In the next stage, descriptive statistics were determined for each measured indicator. Lastly, the correlation between the test indicators was calculated using Pearson’s correlation method.
3. Results
Our results (see
Appendix A for a tabular presentation) indicate that the majority of households consist of four members, representing 44.2% of the sample. This is followed by households with five members, which make up 28.8%, and households with three members, accounting for 12.7%. Households with six or more members represent 10.8% of the sample, while the smallest percentage of households have only two members, making up 3.1%. Additionally, 0.4% of the data are missing.
The data show that the majority of households (28.8%) have incomes between 800 and 1200 KM (KM—Convertible Mark; 1.00 Convertible Mark = 0.51 EUR). Additionally, 26.5% of households report incomes ranging from 1200 to 2000 KM, and 18.8% have incomes between 500 and 800 KM. A smaller percentage of households (12.3%) have incomes between 2000 and 3000 KM, while 8.1% fall within the income range of 300 to 500 KM. Only 1.9% of households have incomes above 3000 KM, and 1.2% report earning less than 300 KM. Data on income were missing for 2.3% of households.
The data reveal that the largest percentage of households (38.1%) have monthly expenses ranging from 500 to 800 KM. This is followed by 22.3% of households with expenditures between 300 and 500 KM, and 19.2% with expenses in the range of 800 to 1500 KM. A smaller portion of households (11.9%) report expenditures between 100 and 300 KM, while only 6.9% of households have expenses exceeding 1500 KM. Data on expenditures are missing for 1.5% of households.
These data indicate that relatives play a significant role in food supply for the surveyed households. Specifically, 38.5% of the subjects indicated that less than a third of their total food supply comes from these sources. Additionally, 30.8% of the subjects reported that food from relatives constitutes between a third and a half of their total food supply. Meanwhile, 14.6% of the subjects do not rely on food from relatives at all, and 14.2% stated that more than half of their total food supply comes from this source. Data are missing for 1.9% of households.
In relation to the BMI distribution of adolescents, the majority of the sample, 50.38%, falls within the normal weight category. This is followed by the 43.58% of adolescents categorized as malnourished. A smaller percentage, 4.62%, is classified as above average weight, and only 1.15% of the sample is classified as obese.
Adolescents born in 2012 have a BF% of 13.69%, which is slightly lower than those born in 2011 and 2010, whose BF% are 14.48% and 14.79%, respectively, while interest-ingly, adolescents born in 2009 show a lower BF% of 11.41%.
The BMR values increase steadily from 1336.2 kcal/day for those born in 2012 to 1563.93 kcal/day for those born in 2010.
However, for those born in 2009, BMR slightly decreases to 1463.7 kcal/day, despite a lower BF% (
Figure 1).
Further data indicate that the majority of adolescents (61.92%) are reported to be physically active at an average level, similar to most of their peers, according to their parents’ assessments. A significant portion (18.85%) of adolescents is perceived as much more physically active than most. A smaller group (10.38%) is slightly more physically active than the majority. On the lower end, 3.85% of adolescents are a little less physically active than most, while only 1.15% are reported as being much less physically active. Additionally, 1.54% of parents were unsure about their children’s level of physical activity.
Data on the weekly exercise habits of adolescents, as reported by their parents, reveal that the highest percentage of adolescents exercise three days per week (23.46%), followed by those who exercise five days (18.08%) and four days (16.92%). A smaller percentage exercise two days per week (13.08%). A few adolescents exercise six days (6.15%) or every day of the week (6.54%). Notably, 4.23% of adolescents do not exercise at all, while 7.31% of parents are unsure about their children’s exercise habits. This suggests that a majority of adolescents in this sample are frequently physically active.
The data present the frequency of weekly fast food consumption among adolescents, based on reports from their parents. The highest percentage of adolescents consume fast food once a week (28.46%), followed closely by those who consume it less than once a week (26.92%). A notable portion of adolescents do not eat fast food at all (13.08%). Additionally, 16.54% consume fast food twice a week, while 9.23% report eating it three to five times a week. Only 1.15% of adolescents eat fast food four or more times a week, and 4.23% of parents are unsure about their children’s fast food consumption.
The data show that the largest percentage of the subjects (40%) watch television for one hour or less on weekdays. A notable portion of the subjects (34.2%) watch for two hours, while 10% watch for three hours. Only 4.6% of the subjects reported watching television for four hours, and the smallest group, 2.3%, watches for five hours. Additionally, 3.5% of the subjects do not watch television at all, and 5% were unsure of their television-watching habits. There was a minimal percentage (0.4%) of missing responses.
The data indicate that the majority of the subjects (36.2%) watch television for two hours on weekends, which is higher than on weekdays. Additionally, 22.7% watch for one hour or less, while 14.6% watch for three hours. About 10% of the subjects reported watching television for four hours on weekends, and only 3.5% said they watch for five hours. The smallest group, 1.9%, watches television for six hours or more. A small percentage, 4.2%, do not watch television at all, while 6.5% were unsure of their television viewing habits on weekends. There is a minimal percentage (0.4%) of missing responses.
The data show that the majority of the subjects (62.3%) do not consume carbonated beverages at all. Additionally, 23.8% of the subjects reported consuming carbonated beverages once a day, while 4.2% consume them twice a day. A small percentage of the subjects, 1.2%, consume carbonated beverages three or more times a day. Furthermore, 8.1% of the subjects indicated that they were unsure of their consumption habits, and 0.4% of responses were missing.
The data indicate a notable difference in the consumption of sweetened beverages compared to carbonated beverages. A significant portion of the subjects, 42.7%, consume sweetened beverages once a day, while 23.1% report consuming them twice a day. Additionally, 13.5% of the subjects consume sweetened beverages three or more times a day. On the other hand, 11.9% of the subjects stated that they do not consume sweetened beverages at all. Furthermore, 8.5% of the subjects were unsure of their consumption habits, and 0.4% of responses were missing.
The data show that 35% of the subjects consume chips once a day, which is nearly proportional to the 37.3% of the subjects who do not consume chips at all. A smaller percentage, 9.2%, consume chips twice a day, while only 5% consume them three or more times a day. Additionally, 12.3% of the subjects were unsure about their consumption habits, and 1.2% of responses were missing.
The majority of the subjects (41.5%) consume one glass of milk per day, while 23.5% of the subjects drink two glasses daily. A smaller percentage, 14.2%, consume less than one glass of milk per day, and 8.5% reported drinking three glasses. Only 4.6% consume four or more glasses of milk, while 3.5% do not drink milk at all. Additionally, 3.8% of the subjects were unsure about their milk consumption, and 0.4% of responses were missing.
The data indicate that 36.9% of the subjects consume fruit once a day, followed by 28.5% who eat fruit twice a day, and 28.1% who consume fruit three or more times a day. A small percentage of the subjects, 3.1%, reported not consuming fruit at all, while another 3.1% were unsure about their fruit consumption. Additionally, 0.4% of the responses were missing.
The table reveals that the majority of the subjects (54.2%) consume vegetables once a day, followed by 25.4% who consume vegetables twice a day, and 14.2% who eat them three or more times a day. A small percentage, 2.7%, reported not consuming vegetables at all, while 3.1% were unsure about their vegetable consumption. Additionally, 0.4% of the responses were missing.
The Correlation Between Psychological Aspects and the Nutritional Level in Adolescence
The psychological aspects examined in this research include depression, anxiety, and stress. Previous studies have indicated that these psychological characteristics are more pronounced in individuals with poor eating habits.
Adolescence is a period during which egocentrism reappears, a psychological concept introduced by [
52].
During this stage, teenagers tend to be self-centered, believing that their thoughts, feelings, experiences, and concerns are unique and misunderstood by others.
This is closely linked to body image, which undergoes changes due to cognitive development. Teenagers begin paying more attention to their appearance and how they are perceived by their peers, which becomes important to their self-esteem.
Figure 2 presents the descriptive indicators of the psychological scales, as well as the indicators that reflect the normality of the distributions and the reliability of the scales.
Overall, none of the scales show significant deviations from a normal distribution based on the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test, and the reliability values for all scales are acceptable, with α values representing the reliability of the scales, ranging from 0.66 to 0.76 (0.66, 0.68, 0.76, respectively).
The results of the correlation between psychological characteristics, specifically depression, anxiety, and stress, and BMI, are presented in
Figure 3.
Based on these results, it can be noted that the psychological variables of depression, anxiety, and stress are negatively related to BMI, with a statistical significance at the 0.05 level. Additionally, the scales for depression, anxiety, and stress are positively correlated with each other at a high intensity.
The findings indicate that the subjects of normal weight exhibit less pronounced levels of depression, anxiety, and stress. Over 70% of adolescents in this sample are classified in the category of normal BMI.
4. Discussion
In this study, the research focus is directed toward the relationship between BMI and specific psychological factors, including depression, anxiety, and stress, with BMI used as an indicator of adolescent body mass. The term “nutritional status” is used here in a broader conceptual sense, referring to the general body mass status of participants, but it does not imply a detailed analysis of nutritional intake or dietary status as specific parameters. In this way, BMI serves as a basis for understanding the relationship between body mass and psychological variables, while nutritional status provides the broader framework within which this relationship is explored. The study utilized the “Physical Activity & Nutrition Behaviors Monitoring Form”, completed by the adolescents’ parents, to gather information on their physical activity and dietary habits. This questionnaire provides additional data that support the analysis of adolescents’ nutritional status, offering a broader insight into the context of body mass and psychological factors. Thus, although the study focuses on the relationship between BMI and psychological aspects, the obtained data on nutrition further support the context of nutritional status in which these relationships are examined.
We determined that our participants exercise three days a week, watch television for one hour or less on weekdays, and for two hours per day on weekends. Most of the subjects do not consume carbonated beverages at all, while they tend to consume sweetened beverages once a day. The majority do not eat chips during the day and typically consume one glass of milk per day. Additionally, the largest portion of the subjects eat fruits and vegetables once a day.
In this sample, over 70% of adolescents were of normal weight, and the results support the hypothesis that adolescents with normal weight are less likely to experience depression, stress, and anxiety.
A lower body fat percentage can have a positive impact on adolescents’ mental health, including a reduction in the symptoms of depression. Research has shown that children with lower body fat percentages often exhibit better self-esteem and a more positive body image. This information is directed toward improved social interactions and reduced peer stigmatization, which further decreases the risk of depression. A lower body fat percentage may be associated with higher levels of physical activity, which positively affects mood and mental health. For example, physical activity can increase the production of endorphins, known as “happiness hormones”, which can further alleviate symptoms of depression [
53]. Certain groups of authors indicate that there is a significant correlation between body fat percentage and depressive symptoms in adolescents, where lower body fat percentages were associated with lower levels of depression [
54]. Additionally, maintaining a healthy body weight and body fat percentage can play a crucial role in preventing mental health issues in adolescents.
However, some research focused on adolescent girls has shown that those who are of normal weight tend to be more dissatisfied with their appearance, whereas significantly malnourished girls report being more satisfied and less anxious, which aligns with the standards of modern society [
39].
Our findings suggest that adolescents exercise regularly and that both they and their parents are mindful of maintaining a healthy diet.
As noted by [
44], children with higher BMIs and malnutrition belong to a higher-risk group.
Previous research highlights a strong overlap between obesity and depression [
45,
46,
47], which may have influenced parents to encourage their children to participate in physical activities and adopt healthier eating habits.
The data indicate that the adolescents involved in our study have normal body weight, likely due to their habits around physical activity and nutrition, as stated by [
55].
The majority of adolescents reported consuming fast food only once a week or less frequently, and a notable percentage do not consume fast food at all.
Most of the adolescents are more physically active than average, so the BMI data obtained align with expectations.
Our findings are practically significant, as they suggest that promoting healthy habits around physical activity and nutrition can contribute to normal weight and psychophysical health.
Based on these results, educational programs for both parents and adolescents could be organized to emphasize the importance of physical activity, healthy eating habits, and the psychological issues of depression, stress, and anxiety related to these factors.
The potential weakness of the study is the is the sample size and its representation. The research was conducted in only two schools from a single municipality, which limits the generalizability of the results to broader populations. The relatively narrow age range (primarily adolescents born between 2005 and 2007) may also limit the ability to assess differences across other age groups in adolescence. Additionally, the sample may not adequately account for diverse sociodemographic backgrounds, which could influence both psychological factors and nutritional behaviors.
A recommendation for future research is to include a more heterogeneous sample, as well as a sample of adolescents receiving treatment for nutritional issues.
The global strategy for improving health through nutrition and physical activity highlights that proper nutrition combined with physical activity represents the best defense against health issues, as mandated by [
56,
57,
58].
Finally, we understand that socioeconomic factors, age, and gender are significant variables that can impact results. Future research should include these variables, as we believe this will enrich the analysis and contribute to developing practical recommendations. This way, the focus will be more directed toward improving the physical and emotional health of adolescents. Such an approach would help explain the complex interactions that affect adolescent health.