Next Article in Journal
Sleep-Disordered Breathing and Its Association with Nocturnal Enuresis at the Primary Schools in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study
Previous Article in Journal
A New Pattern of Brain and Cord Gadolinium Enhancement in Molybdenum Cofactor Deficiency: A Case Report
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Assessment of Metabolic Syndrome and Kidney and Heart Function in Childhood Cancer Survivors

by
Aleksandra Janecka
1,2,
Joanna Stefanowicz
1,2,3,*,
Anna Owczarzak
4,
Marek Tomaszewski
2,
Tomasz Batko
2 and
Ninela Irga-Jaworska
1,2
1
Department of Paediatrics, Haematology and Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Gdansk, Debinki 7, 80-211 Gdańsk, Poland
2
Department of Paediatrics, Haematology and Oncology, University Clinical Centre, Debinki 7, 80-952 Gdansk, Poland
3
Faculty of Health Sciences with Institute of Maritime and Tropical Medicine, Medical University of Gdansk, 80-211 Gdansk, Poland
4
Department of Clinical Nutrition, Faculty of Health Sciences with Institute of Maritime and Tropical Medicine, Medical University of Gdansk, Debinki 7, 80-211 Gdansk, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Children 2023, 10(6), 1073; https://doi.org/10.3390/children10061073
Submission received: 28 April 2023 / Revised: 26 May 2023 / Accepted: 2 June 2023 / Published: 18 June 2023

Abstract

:
Background: The survivors of childhood cancer suffer from a number of long-term side effects. These include atherosclerosis and cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) that develop earlier in adulthood than in the rest of the population. The aim of this study was to identify prognostic factors of developing atherosclerosis before the development of symptomatic CVD. Methods: A total of 141 children that were 7–18 years old were examined; there were 116 survivors of childhood malignancies (hematopoietic and lymphoproliferative malignancies—52; neuroblastoma—22; Wilms tumor—24; other solid tumors—18) and 25 healthy controls. Anthropometric measurements, blood pressure measurements, ultrasonography of the abdomen, echocardiography, and laboratory tests were performed. Results: There were no significant differences in gender distribution, time from the end of the treatment, weight, BMI, prevalence of central obesity, blood pressure and resistive index of the renal arteries, lipid profile, or glucose and fibrinogen levels. Patients with solid tumors had a significantly lower height and worse renal function. Patients with hematological malignancies significantly presented the lowest shortening fraction of the left ventricle. The salusin β levels were significantly higher in the control group than among the patients. Conclusions: The type and severity of side effects are closely related to the type of neoplasm and the treatment that has been undergone. Careful observation and regular follow-up are necessary.

1. Introduction

Over recent decades, it has been possible to observe significant developments in medicine as well as in oncological treatment for children. Today, we pay attention not only to curing cancer but also to the quality of life after treatment. Consequently, late side effects are an area of interest for researchers. Late side effects include pulmonary, cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, genitourinary, musculoskeletal, and endocrinological disorders, neurological complaints, nutritional disorders, short stature, infertility, immune deficiency, and a second neoplasm. The majority (60–90%) of survivors report at least one complaint. The type of symptom mostly depends on the type and localization of the neoplasm, the treatment (chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or surgery), and the treatment era. Progress in medicine results in better curability and fewer severe late side effects. The time from the end of the treatment and the age at the moment of diagnosis also seem to have an impact on the reported disorders [1,2,3,4].
Nevertheless, circulatory problems are a fairly common and severe complication. They occur in 20–30% of patients [3,5].
They involve hypertension, heart failure, coronary artery disease, and cerebrovascular disorders. Cytostatics—especially anthracyclines—and radiotherapy are cardiotoxic agents. Moreover, oncological treatment seems to accelerate the development of atherosclerosis. Consequently, childhood cancer survivors (CCSs) have a risk of cardiac death that is seven times higher than that in the general population [6,7,8].
At the same time, cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are responsible for most deaths in adults. The risk factors of CVDs are well known. On this basis, the term “metabolic syndrome” was established. The components of metabolic syndrome are obesity, hypertension, hyperglycemia, and lipid disorders [9].
Obesity in CCSs that develops in childhood, adolescence, or young adulthood is strongly associated with the subsequent development of health problems later in life, such as adult-onset diabetes mellitus, hypertension, dyslipidemia, cardiovascular disease, and osteoarthritis [10]. Obesity is a well-recognized consequence of childhood cancer treatment. The prevalence of obesity in childhood ALL survivors ranges from 11% to 40%. Compared with age-, sex-, and race-matched controls, adult survivors of childhood ALL have a 1.5-fold excess risk of obesity in comparison with the general population [11].
The prognostic factors were researched. Among them, salusin β seems to be a promising agent. Most studies revealed increased serum levels of salusin β in patients with diabetes, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, and obesity [12,13,14].
The aim of our study was to identify the prognostic factors of developing atherosclerosis before the development of symptomatic CVDs.

2. Patients and Methods

2.1. Patients

This study enrolled 141 children ages 7 to 18 years, including 116 survivors of childhood malignancies and 25 healthy controls. The patients were treated in the Department of Paediatrics, Haematology, and Oncology at the Medical University of Gdansk from 1999 to 2017. The examinations in the study were conducted at least 5 years after the end of oncological treatment during routine controls.
Patients who had undergone any kind of transplantation were excluded.
The study consisted of an assessment of patient history and physical examinations, including anthropometric measurements, triple blood pressure (BP) measurements, ultrasonography of the abdomen, echocardiography, and the collection of blood and urine samples.
The survivors were divided into 4 groups according to the diagnosis that determined the treatment: hematopoietic and lymphoproliferative malignancies (n = 52), neuroblastomas (n = 22), Wilms tumors (n = 24), and other solid tumors (n = 18).
The group with hematopoietic and lymphoproliferative malignancies comprised patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) (n = 37), acute myeloid leukemia (AML) (n = 1), Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) (n = 3), non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHLs) (n = 6), and Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH) (n = 5). All of them underwent standard chemotherapy: 8 patients with ALL and 1 with AML received radiotherapy for the central nervous system; 1 patient with HL was treated with radiotherapy to the mediastinum; and 1 patient with NHL underwent radiotherapy to the abdomen.
In the group with Wilms tumors (WTs), 5 patients were treated with radiotherapy (4—abdomen, 1—lungs). In the group with neuroblastoma, 1 patient was treated with radiotherapy. In two patients with WTs, bilateral tumors were diagnosed; they underwent patrial nephrectomy. The rest of the children with WTs were treated with total nephrectomy.
The group with solid tumors consisted of patients with rhabdomyosarcoma (n = 7), hepatoblastoma (n = 4), yolk sac tumors (YSTs) (n = 3), other germ cell tumors (GCTs) (n=1), retinoblastoma (n = 1), alveolar soft-part sarcoma (n = 1), and medulloblastoma (n = 1). Six patients underwent radiotherapy: five with rhabdomyosarcoma and one with medulloblastoma.

2.2. Methods

The anthropometric measurements—such as measurements of the height, weight, and waist circumference of the patients—were performed using standard techniques (WE150, Mensor, Warsaw, Poland).
The laboratory blood testing included evaluation of the blood count, serum creatinine, cystatin C, glucose, lipid profiles, fibrinogen, uric acid, and salusin β levels after an overnight fast.
Urinalysis and albumin and creatinine excretion were performed using urine sampling. Furthermore, the albumin-to-creatinine ratio (ACR) was evaluated.
The serum creatinine was detected using an enzymatic method (Alinityc Creatinine Reagent Kit, Abbott). The serum cystatin C levels were analyzed using immunonephelometry (N Latex Cystatin C, Siemens). The estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was calculated based on the serum creatinine and cystatin C levels.
The eGFR was indirectly measured by using the original Schwartz-, creatinine-, and BUN-based equations and Filler formulas.
The Schwartz formula was evaluated as follows: GFR in mL/min/1.73 sq m = k × height in cm/serum creatinine concentration in mg/dL, where the constant k = 0.413 originated from the values for children published in the literature. [15]. The creatinine- and BUN-based eGFR was calculated according to the following equation: 40.7(height/SCr)0.64(30/BUN)0.202 [16].
Additionally, the GFR was calculated based on cystatin C concentration according to the Filler formula: logGFR = 1.962 + [1.123 × log(1/cystatin C)] [17].
The plasma lipid profile was defined by electrophoresis (Hydragel 15 Lipo + Lp(a) Sebia). The concentration of salusin β (pg/mL) was assayed by using an immunoenzymatic technique with an ELISA kit for salusin β (produced by Cloud-Clone Corp., Houston, TX, USA; Wuhan, China, 2018).
Metabolic syndrome and central obesity were defined according to the criteria of the International Diabetes Federation [18].
Blood pressure (BP) was measured three times in every child in the study by using an oscillometric method with a standard clinical sphygmomanometer (professional blood pressure monitor: HBP-1100-E, OMRON Healthcare Co., Ltd., Kyoto, Japan, 2014), according to the guidelines and recommendations of the Polish Pediatric Nephrology Society. The mean values of the systolic and diastolic pressures were determined. The results were then compared to the reference values provided by the OLAF project, which were matched according to sex, age, and height [19,20].
Ultrasonography of the abdomen was performed by well-trained and experienced sonographers according to a standardized protocol (Toshiba Aplio 500, Philips Epiq 7G, Fujifilm Arietta 750). During the examination, the kidneys were assessed. Moreover, a spectral Doppler assessment was conducted in the arcuate arteries of the kidneys to evaluate the renal arterial resistive index (RI). Transthoracic echocardiography was performed with a single echosonographer and cardiologist according to the recommendations of the American Society of Echocardiography (Canon Xario 200G) [21].

2.3. Statistical Methods

The mean, median, standard deviation, range (minimum–maximum), and lower and upper quartiles (25 Q and 75 Q) were calculated for each parameter. The statistical significance between means for different groups was calculated by using a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) or by using the nonparametric Mann–Whitney U or Kruskal–Wallis test when the T-variances in the groups were not homogeneous (the homogeneity of the variance was determined by using Bartlett’s test).
Statistical significance between frequencies was calculated by using the chi-square test (χ2df) with Yate’s correction and with the corresponding degree of freedom (df; df = (m − 1) × (n − 1), where m indicates the number of rows, and n indicates the number of columns).
The relationships between the two parameters were assessed using correlation analysis, and the Spearman correlation coefficients were calculated.
For the reference population, we used the results of the OLAF study, which was performed on children from the Polish population who were aged 7 to 18 years.
A p-value of less than 0.05 was required to reject the null hypothesis. The statistical analysis was performed using the EPIINFO Ver. 7.1.1.14 software package.

2.4. Ethics Committee

This study was accepted by the Independent Bioethics Committee for Scientific Research at the Medical University of Gdansk (NKBBN/359/2015, NKBBN/359-58/2018, NKBBN/359-9/2019, NKBBN/359-721/2021). Written informed consent was received from the legal guardians of the children. The procedures followed were in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki of 1975, as revised in 2000.

3. Results

The evaluated groups varied in age. The group with neuroblastoma consisted of the youngest patients. The healthy volunteers were significantly younger than the patients with hematopoietic and lymphoproliferative malignancies and older than the patients with neuroblastoma.
There were no significant differences in gender distribution, time from the end of the oncological treatment, weight, BMI, or central obesity, which were evaluated in percentiles.
There was a significant difference in height. Patients who had undergone treatment for solid tumors had the shortest height in comparison with all other groups, and this difference was statistically significant. Patients who had undergone treatment for neuroblastoma were the tallest and were significantly taller than patients with hematological malignancies, Wilms tumors, and solid tumors; see Table 1.
Most of the patients reported the occurrence of cardiovascular disorders in their family members. In the group with solid tumors, CVDs were the rarest in their family histories.
Side effects during oncological treatments, such as kidney injuries and hypertension, were the most common in the WT patients; see Table 2.
There were no significant differences in either systolic or diastolic blood pressure in any of the examined groups; see Table 3.
Elevated blood pressure exceeding the 95th percentile in all measurements was revealed in 19% of the patients with hematological malignancies and in 17% of the patients with solid tumors; see Table 3.
The serum salusin β levels were significantly higher in the control group. The levels of uric acid were the highest in patients with hematopoietic malignancies and WTs. There were no statistically significant differences in the lipid profile or glucose and fibrinogen levels, as seen in Table 4. However, the Spearman correlation revealed a significant positive relationship between salusin β and low-density lipoprotein (LDL), as well as between cystatin C and ACR. There were no correlations between salusin β and age, time from the end of the treatment, weight, height, waist circumference, BMI, blood pressure, other lipid fractions, glucose, or eGFR.
Differences were also revealed in the kidney parameters in both the laboratory tests and the ultrasound examinations. Patients with solid tumors presented the worst kidney function, which was confirmed by their levels of creatinine, cystatin C, BUN, eGFR, and excretion of albumin in urine; see Table 5.
The ultrasound examinations revealed enlarged kidneys in most of the WT patients, and this occurred statistically more often than in other groups.
There were no significant differences in the RI of the renal arteries between the evaluated groups; see Table 6.
In echocardiography, the patients and the control group had similar ejection fractions (EFs), but the shortening fraction (SF) was significantly worse in the group with hematological malignancies than in the control group, the WT group, and the group with other solid tumors.
Metabolic syndrome was diagnosed in two patients (with a germ cell tumor and hepatoblastoma). Sixteen patients and two volunteers met two of the criteria for metabolic syndrome; see Table 7.

4. Discussion

Among the survivors of childhood malignancies, a number of late side effects are observed. These survivors have an increased risk of earlier onset of age-related chronic diseases, such as obesity, hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetes mellitus, metabolic syndrome, cardiovascular diseases, and chronic kidney disease [2,22].
In our study, we concentrated on the components of metabolic syndrome and kidney parameters that are closely related to hypertension, and we determined one of the components of metabolic syndrome. Moreover, we measured the serum levels of salusin β as a predictor of the development of atherosclerosis.
According to the rules, we diagnosed metabolic syndrome in two patients with solid tumors. Although the number of patients evaluated was quite fair, it was not large enough to define any tendencies. We examined the biochemical parameters of metabolic syndrome—lipids, glucose, uric acid, and fibrinogen. We only detected higher concentrations of uric acid in survivors of hematological malignancies.
The patients differed in terms of waist circumference—the greatest difference was in the survivors of hematological malignancies. We did not reveal any significant differences in weight, BMI, or prevalence of central obesity between the groups of patients and the control group. Among the anthropometric measurements, only height was a significantly different feature among the patients. Children with solid tumors were shorter than the rest of the patients and the healthy controls. Patients with NBL were taller than the rest of the patients.
Why? What influenced the results?
The keys to answering this question are the type of cancer, risk group, and treatment that the children received, which depended on their diagnosis and risk group. The group of neuroblastoma survivors (NBLs) mostly consisted of patients with low and intermediate risk. Patients with high-risk NBLs are treated very aggressively with induction chemotherapy, surgery, mega-dose chemotherapy, autologous bone marrow transplantation (auto-BMT), radiotherapy, and immunotherapy. Our patients were mostly treated for a shorter time, and chemotherapy and surgery were standard treatments. The group with solid tumors other than NBLs and WTs included patients with RMS, HBLs, and GCTs. These patients received ifosfamide and cisplatin, and their chemotherapy was very aggressive and long.
Severe treatments for solid tumors also result in other side effects. Patients with solid tumors—apart from patients with Wilms tumors—presented the worst renal function. The survivors of solid tumors received nephrotoxic treatment, while in the survivors of Wilms tumors, this was a consequence of nephrectomy. These facts were confirmed in other studies [23,24,25].
The group with hematological malignancies stood out in terms of their age at the moment of diagnosis and their shortening fraction. This group was the oldest at the beginning of the treatment. The worse SF seemed to be a consequence of the anthracycline therapy that they received [26,27,28,29]. The EF remained at the same level in all evaluated groups.
Therefore, we divided the survivors into four groups according to their diagnoses: hematological malignancies, NBLs, WTs, and other solid tumors. The studied groups differed in age; the neuroblastoma survivors were younger than the others. This was compatible with epidemiological data—neuroblastoma is the most common tumor in infants and neonates.
The groups of patients that were compared were similar in terms of the time from the end of the treatment. However, patients with NBLs were the youngest at the moment of diagnosis, and patients with hematological malignancies were the oldest. The collected data did not reflect a dependence of the age distribution on epidemiology.
Previous studies suggested that patients who are treated in early childhood are more vulnerable to side effects than teenagers and young adults [4]. We cannot confirm this statement because we collected data from patients up to 11 years from the moment of diagnosis.
A study that Krawczuk-Rybak et al. performed on 1761 Polish CCSs reported short stature/obesity in over 20% of the survivors, and in general, disorders of the circulatory system were present in over 30% of the patients 5 years or more after the treatment; however, the authors did not provide information about the presented complaints in relation to the type of neoplasm [3].
However, Lipschultz et al. compared the conditions of 164 survivors in the Children’s Oncology Group with a matched noncancer population in the USA. The report revealed that obesity was significantly more common in the control group. Moreover, at least two criteria for metabolic syndrome were present significantly more often in the noncancer population, although the survivors had higher blood pressure and an increased frequency of prehypertension/hypertension. The prevalence of diabetes and dyslipidemia was similar in the survivors and the matched population. However, the survivors had lower predicted cardiovascular risk because their lifestyles were more favorable than those of the control group; the risk of future symptomatic cardiovascular disease predicted in childhood-cancer-survivor-specific risk models was moderate or higher [7].
Kooijmans et al. evaluated the renal function in 1024 Dutch adult CCSs at least 5 years after their treatment, without a division according to the type of neoplasm, and they performed a comparison with healthy controls. They revealed an increased risk of kidney dysfunction in CCSs, particularly at ages over 40 [30]. However, the prevalence of hypertension was similar between the two examined groups [31].
We assessed BP and ultrasound kidney parameters, and we confirmed that patients with Wilms tumors had large kidneys (expressed as the percentile depending on age and height), and this was connected with compensatory hypertrophy. However, we did not observe a difference in the renal arterial resistive index (RI).
A study by Merzenich et al. examined 4505 survivors of childhood cancers who were registered in the German Childhood Cancer Registry 5 years after their initial diagnosis in comparison with a healthy population; this confirmed that CCSs had an increased risk of death and, specifically, cardiac death [32]. This study followed earlier cohort reports that were performed in the United States/Canada, the UK, Switzerland, and the Nordic countries [33,34,35].
Recently performed research on CCSs provided quite consistent data. Such studies leaned towards the hypothesis of a higher risk of atherosclerosis and cardiac death in CCSs than in the general population. In recent decades, oncological treatments have been significantly modified, which has brought, at the same time, greater effectiveness and fewer side effects. In addition, medical care after treatment and the condition of the general population also influence the condition of CCSs. In developed countries, where medical care is well organized, diseases of civilization are leading health problems and reflect the long-term side effects of oncological treatment.
Our study is probably the first to evaluate the levels of serum salusin β in children after oncological treatment. The available literature has provided information about salusin β in children with hypertension, obesity, lipid disorders, and Down syndrome [36,37,38,39]. The publications concerning adult patients are more numerous and concentrate on symptomatic atherosclerosis or conditions directly leading to atherosclerosis, such as diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and obesity [40,41,42,43]. The type of oncological treatment also seems to be a factor of higher risk of atherosclerosis, but this was not reflected in the levels of salusin β.
Such a result was quite surprising for us, but it suggests that current knowledge about salusin β is still deficient.
This study has some limitations. We used quite a large population, but the groups were very diverse. Still, the group that was evaluated was too small to draw conclusions about population risk. The collected data consisted of information on patients from up to 11 years from the moment of diagnosis, and they do not reflect epidemiology. Moreover, the results are partially based on information obtained from patients’ parents (family history, side effects observed during the treatment).

5. Conclusions

Patients treated because of childhood cancers are at risk for long-term side effects. The type and severity of these side effects are closely related to the type of neoplasm and the treatment. Careful observation and regular follow-up in adulthood are necessary.
There is a need to conduct further studies to confirm the role of salusin β in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.J. and J.S. methodology, A.J., J.S., A.O., M.T., T.B. and N.I.-J.; software, A.J. and J.S.; validation, A.J., J.S., A.O. and M.T.; formal analysis, A.J. and J.S.; investigation, A.J., J.S., A.O., M.T. and T.B.; writing—original draft preparation, A.J.; writing—review and editing, J.S. and M.T.; supervision, J.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was financed by up to 10% with financial sources from the Department of Pediatrics, Hematology, and Oncology, Medical University of Gdansk (No. ST 02-0008/07).

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Independent Bioethics Committee for Scientific Research at the Medical University of Gdansk (NKBBN/359/2015—15 September 2015, NKBBN/359-58/2018—12 February 2018, NKBBN/359-9/2019—10 January 2019, NKBBN/359-721/2021—21 September 2021).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We would like to give special thanks to the children and their parents for their participation in the study. We would like to express our gratitude to all collaborators who helped us collect participants’ data.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Latoch, E.; Zubowska, M.; Młynarski, W.; Stachowicz-Stencel, T.; Stefanowicz, J.; Sławińska, D.; Kowalczyk, J.; Skalska-Sadowska, J.; Wachowiak, J.; Badowska, W.; et al. Late effects of childhood cancer treatment in long-term survivors diagnosed before the age of 3 years—A multicenter, nationwide study. Cancer Epidemiol. 2022, 80, 102209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Oeffinger, K.C.; Mertens, A.C.; Sklar, C.A.; Kawashima, T.; Hudson, M.M.; Meadows, A.T.; Friedman, D.L.; Marina, N.; Hobbie, W.; Kadan-Lottick, N.S.; et al. Chronic Health Conditions in Adult Survivors of Childhood Cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2006, 355, 1572–1582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Krawczuk-Rybak, M.; Panasiuk, A.; Stachowicz-Stencel, T.; Zubowska, M.; Skalska-Sadowska, J.; Sęga-Pondel, D.; Czajńska-Deptuła, A.; Sławińska, D.; Badowska, W.; Kamieńska, E.; et al. Health status of Polish children and adolescents after cancer treatment. Eur. J. Pediatr. 2018, 177, 437–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Kilsdonk, E.; Broeder, E.V.D.-D.; van Leeuwen, F.E.; Heuvel-Eibrink, M.M.V.D.; Loonen, J.J.; van der Pal, H.J.; Bresters, D.; Versluys, A.B.; Pieters, R.; Hauptmann, M.; et al. Late Mortality in Childhood Cancer Survivors according to Pediatric Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment Era in the Dutch LATER Cohort. Cancer Investig. 2022, 40, 413–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Prasad, M.; Goswami, S.; Chinnaswamy, G.; Banavali, S.D.; Kurkure, P.A. Long-Term Outcomes in Survivors of Childhood Cancer: A 30-Year Experience From India. JCO Glob. Oncol. 2022, 8, 2200044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Armenian, S.H.; Armstrong, G.T.; Aune, G.; Chow, E.J.; Ehrhardt, M.; Ky, B.; Moslehi, J.; Mulrooney, D.A.; Nathan, P.C.; Ryan, T.D.; et al. Disease in Survivors of Childhood Cancer: Insights into Epidemiology, Pathophysiology, and Prevention. J. Clin. Oncol. 2018, 36, 2135–2144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Lipshultz, E.R.; Chow, E.J.; Doody, D.R.; Armenian, S.H.; Asselin, B.L.; Baker, K.S.; Bhatia, S.; Constine, L.S.; Freyer, D.R.; Kopp, L.M.; et al. Cardiometabolic risk in childhood cancer survivors: A report from the Children’s Oncology Group. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 2022, 31, 536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Armstrong, G.T.; Liu, Q.; Yasui, Y.; Neglia, J.P.; Leisenring, W.; Robison, L.L.; Mertens, A.C. Late Mortality among 5-Year Survivors of Childhood Cancer: A Summary from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study. J. Clin. Oncol. 2009, 27, 2328–2338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Eckel, R.H.; Grundy, S.M.; Zimmet, P.Z. The metabolic syndrome. Lancet 2005, 365, 1415–1428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Armstrong, G.T.; Oeffinger, K.C.; Chen, Y.; Kawashima, T.; Yasui, Y.; Leisenring, W.; Stovall, M.; Chow, E.J.; Sklar, C.A.; Mulrooney, D.A.; et al. Modifiable Risk Factors and Major Cardiac Events among Adult Survivors of Childhood Cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 2013, 31, 3673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Nottage, K.A.; Ness, K.K.; Li, C.; Srivastava, D.; Robison, L.L.; Hudson, M.M. Metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular risk among long-term survivors of acute lymphoblastic leukaemia—From the St. Jude Lifetime Cohort. Br. J. Haematol. 2014, 165, 364–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Zhao, M.-X.; Zhou, B.; Ling, L.; Xiong, X.-Q.; Zhang, F.; Chen, Q.; Li, Y.-H.; Kang, Y.-M.; Zhu, G.-Q. Salusin-β contributes to oxidative stress and inflammation in diabetic cardiomyopathy. Cell Death Dis. 2017, 8, e2690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Pan, Y.; Sun, S.; Wang, X.; Chen, A.; Fei, X.; Wang, W.; Han, Y. Improvement of Vascular Function by Knockdown of Salusin-β in Hypertensive Rats via Nitric Oxide and Reactive Oxygen Species Signaling Pathway. Front. Physiol. 2021, 12, 622954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Paahoo, A.; Tadibi, V.; Behpoor, N. Effectiveness of Continuous Aerobic Versus High-Intensity Interval Training on Atherosclerotic and Inflammatory Markers in Boys with Overweight/Obesity. Pediatr. Exerc. Sci. 2021, 33, 131–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Bethesda, Maryland. Report of the Second Task Force on Blood Pressure Control in Children—1987. Task Force on Blood Pressure Control in Children. Pediatrics 1987, 79, 1–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. KDIGO. 2012 Clinical practice guideline for the evaluation and management of chronic kidney disease. Off. J. Int. Soc. Nephrol. 2013, 3, 1–163. [Google Scholar]
  17. Filler, G.; Lepage, N. Should the Schwartz formula for estimation of GFR be replaced by cystatin C formula? Pediatr. Nephrol. 2003, 18, 981–985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zimmet, P.; Alberti, K.G.; Kaufman, F.; Tajima, N.; Silink, M.; Arslanian, S.; Wong, G.; Bennett, P.; Shaw, J.; Caprio, S. IDF Consensus Group. The metabolic syndrome in children and adolescents - an IDF consensus report. Pediatr Diabetes. 2007, 8, 299–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Litwin, M.; Kułaga, Z.; Grajda, A.; Gurzkowska, B.; Napieralska, E.; Kułga, K. Rozkłady wartości ciśnienia krwi w populacji referencyjnej dzieci i młodzieży w wieku szkolnym. Stand. Med. 2010, 7, 853–864. [Google Scholar]
  20. Litwin, M.; Kułaga, Z.; Różdżyńska, A.; Palczewska, I.; Grajda, A.; Gurzkowska, B.; Napieralska, E.; Grupa Badaczy, O.L.A.F. Siatki centylowe wysokości, masy ciała i wskaźniki masy ciała dzieci i młodzieży w Polsce—wyniki badania OLAF. Stand. Med. 2010, 7, 690–700. [Google Scholar]
  21. Lang, R.M.; Badano, L.P.; Mor-Avi, V.; Afilalo, J.; Armstrong, A.; Ernande, L.; Flachskampf, F.A.; Foster, E.; Goldstein, S.A.; Kuznetsova, T.; et al. Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: An update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr. 2015, 28, 1–39.e14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Suh, E.; Stratton, K.L.; Leisenring, W.M.; Nathan, P.C.; Ford, J.S.; Freyer, D.R.; McNeer, J.L.; Stock, W.; Stovall, M.; Krull, K.R.; et al. Late Mortality and Chronic Health Conditions in Long-term Survivors of Adolescent and Early Young Adult Cancers: A retrospective cohort analysis from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study. Lancet Oncol. 2020, 21, 421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Stefanowicz, J.; Owczuk, R.; Aleksandrowicz, E.; Owczarzak, A.; Kurylak, A.; Adamkiewicz-Drożyńska, E.; Balcerska, A. Renal Function and Low–Molecular-Weight Proteins (Cystatin C, β2-Microglobulin, Neutrophil Gelatinase-associated Lipocalin) in Child and Young Adult Cancer Survivors. J. Pediatr. Hematol. Oncol. 2012, 34, 461–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Stefanowicz, J.; Kosiak, M.; Romanowicz, G.; Owczuk, R.; Adamkiewicz-Drożyńska, E.; Balcerska, A. Glomerular filtration rate and prevalence of chronic kidney disease in Wilms’ tumour survivors. Pediatr. Nephrol. 2011, 26, 759–766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Stefanowicz, J.; Owczuk, R.; Sierota, D.; Kaczorowska-Hać, B.; Balcerska, A. Does Antineoplasm Treatment Decrease the Glomerular Filtration Rate in Children? Kidney Blood Press. Res. 2009, 32, 194–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Armenian, S.H.; Gelehrter, S.K.; Vase, T.; Venkatramani, R.; Landier, W.; Wilson, K.D.; Herrera, C.; Reichman, L.; Menteer, J.-D.; Mascarenhas, L.; et al. Screening for cardiac dysfunction in anthracycline-exposed childhood cancer survivors. Clin. Cancer Res. 2014, 20, 6314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Merkx, R.; Leerink, J.M.; de Baat, E.C.; Feijen, E.A.M.; Kok, W.E.M.; Mavinkurve-Groothuis, A.M.C.; Loonen, J.; van der Pal, H.J.H.; Bellersen, L.; de Korte, C.L.; et al. Asymptomatic systolic dysfunction on contemporary echocardiography in anthracycline-treated long-term childhood cancer survivors: A systematic review. J. Cancer Surviv. 2022, 16, 338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Mawad, W.; Mertens, L.; Pagano, J.J.; Riesenkampff, E.; Reichert, M.J.; Mital, S.; Kantor, P.F.; Greenberg, M.; Liu, P.; Nathan, P.C.; et al. Effect of anthracycline therapy on myocardial function and markers of fibrotic remodelling in childhood cancer survivors. Eur. Heart J. Cardiovasc. Imaging 2021, 22, 435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Dietz, A.C.; Sivanandam, S.; Konety, S.; Kaufman, C.L.; Gage, R.M.; Kelly, A.S.; Neglia, J.P.; Mulrooney, D.A. Evaluation of Traditional and Novel Measures of Cardiac Function to Detect Anthracycline Induced Cardiotoxicity in Survivors of Childhood Cancer. J. Cancer Surviv. 2014, 8, 183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Kooijmans, E.C.; van der Pal, H.J.; Pluijm, S.M.; Loo, M.v.d.H.-V.d.; Kremer, L.C.; Bresters, D.; Broeder, E.v.D.-D.; Heuvel-Eibrink, M.M.v.D.; Loonen, J.J.; Louwerens, M.; et al. The Dutch Childhood Cancer Survivor Study (DCCSS)-LATER 2 kidney analysis examined long-term glomerular dysfunction in childhood cancer survivors. Kidney Int. 2022, 102, 1136–1146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kooijmans, E.C.; van der Pal, H.J.; Pluijm, S.M.; Bresters, D.; Broeder, E.V.D.-D.; Loo, M.V.D.H.-V.D.; Heuvel-Eibrink, M.M.V.D.; Kremer, L.C.; Loonen, J.J.; Louwerens, M.; et al. Hypertension in long-term childhood cancer survivors after treatment with potentially nephrotoxic therapy; DCCSS-LATER 2: Renal study. Eur. J. Cancer 2022, 172, 287–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Merzenich, H.; Baaken, D.; Schneider, A.; Neu, M.A.; Wingerter, A.; Faber, J.; Wild, P.S.; Spix, C. Mortality risk among 5-year survivors of childhood cancer in Germany—Results from the CVSS study (Cardiac and Vascular late Sequelae in long-term Survivors of childhood cancer study). Int. J. Cancer 2021, 150, 67–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Schindler, M.; Spycher, B.D.; Ammann, R.A.; Ansari, M.; Michel, G.; Kuehni, C.E. Cause-specific long-term mortality in survivors of childhood cancer in Switzerland: A population-based study. Int. J. Cancer 2016, 139, 322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Armstrong, G.T.; Chen, Y.; Yasui, Y.; Leisenring, W.; Gibson, T.M.; Mertens, A.C.; Stovall, M.; Oeffinger, K.C.; Bhatia, S.; Krull, K.R.; et al. Reduction in late mortality among 5-year survivors of childhood cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2016, 374, 833–842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Garwicz, S.; Anderson, H.; Olsen, J.H.; Winther, J.F.; Sankila, R.; Langmark, F.; Tryggvadóttir, L.; Möller, T.R.; Nordic Society for Pediatric Hematology for the Association of the Nordic Cancer Registries (ANCR); Nordic Society for Pediatric Hematology Oncology (NOPHO). Late and very late mortality in 5-year survivors of childhood cancer: Changing pattern over four decades—Experience from the Nordic countries. Int. J. Cancer 2012, 131, 1659–1666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Paahoo, A.; Tadibi, V.; Behpoor, N. Effect of Two Chronic Exercise Protocols on Pre-Atherosclerotic and Anti-Atherosclerotic Biomarkers Levels in Obese and Overweight Children. Iran. J. Pediatr. 2020, 30, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Stefanowicz-Bielska, A.; Wierzba, J.; Stefanowicz, J.; Owczarzak, A.; Chamienia, A. Obesity and overweight and accompanying metabolic disorders occur in children with Down syndrome. Acta Med. Mediterr. 2020, 36, 2473–2479. [Google Scholar]
  38. Dervişoǧlu, P.; Elmas, B.; Kösecik, M.; Işgüven, Ş.P.; Büyükavcl, M.; Köroǧlu, M. Salusin-α levels are negatively correlated with diastolic blood pressure in children with obesity. Cardiol. Young 2019, 29, 1225–1229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Kołakowska, U.; Kuroczycka-Saniutycz, E.; Olański, W.; Wasilewska, A. Correlation of Salusin Beta with hs-CRP and ADMA in Hypertensive Children and Adolescents. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2018, 24, 3551–3557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Awad, A.S.; Ali, H.A.; Al-Rufaie, M.M. Assessment of Serum Levels of Salusin α and Salusin β in Cardiovascular Disease Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Therapy. Indian J. Forensic Med. Toxicol. 2020, 14, 303–308. [Google Scholar]
  41. Yassien, M.; Fawzy, O.; Mahmoud, E.; Khidr, E.G. Serum salusin-β in relation to atherosclerosis and ventricular dysfunction in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Metab. Syndr. 2020, 14, 2057–2062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Alpsoy, S.; Dogan, B.; Ozkaramanli Gur, D.; Akyüz, A.; Fidan, Ç.; Guzel, S.; Ozkoyuncu, B. Assessment of salusin alpha and salusin beta levels in patients with newly diagnosed dipper and non-dipper hypertension. Clin. Exp. Hypertens. 2021, 43, 42–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Nazari, M.; Minasian, V.; Hovsepian, S. Effects of two types of moderate-and high-intensity interval training on serum salusin-α and salusin-β levels and lipid profile in women with overweight/obesity. Diabetes Metab. Syndr. Obes. 2020, 13, 1385–1390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Table 1. The characteristics of survivors and the control group; the median results (25Q ÷ 75Q) are provided.
Table 1. The characteristics of survivors and the control group; the median results (25Q ÷ 75Q) are provided.
Control Group (n = 25)Hematopoietic and Lymphoproliferative
Malignancies (n = 52)
NBL 2
(n = 22)
WT 3
(n = 24)
Other Solid Tumors (n = 18)p
Sex (M/F)14/1134/1815/710/1412/60.276
Age at the moment of examination
(years)
11
(9.0 ÷ 14.0)
14.0
(12.0 ÷ 16.0)
8.5
(7.0 ÷ 12.0)
11.5
(10.0 ÷ 15.0)
12.5
(10.0 ÷ 15.0)
0.000 *
Age at the moment of diagnosis (years) 3.0
(2.0 ÷ 6.0)
0
(0 ÷ 1.0)
2.0
(1.0 ÷ 4.0)
2.0
(1.0 ÷ 5.0)
0.000 *
Time from the end of treatment (years) 7.0
(6.00 ÷ 9.0)
7.0 (6.0 ÷ 10.0)7.5
(6.0 ÷ 10.0)
8.5
(6.0 ÷ 11.0)
0.853
Weight (pc 1)63.0
(40.0 ÷ 89.0)
64.5
(50.5 ÷ 88.5)
68.0
(45.0 ÷ 88.0)
66.0
(35.0 ÷ 79.5)
36.0
(8.0 ÷ 77.0)
0.216
Height (pc 1)74.0
(47.0 ÷ 90.0)
58.5
(32.0 ÷ 87.0)
90.0
(54.0 ÷ 96.0)
54.0
(36.5 ÷ 80.0)
26.0
(11.0 ÷ 63.0)
0.004 *
BMI (pc 1)56.0
(26.0 ÷ 85.0)
69.5
(34.5 ÷ 87.5)
47.0
(35.0 ÷ 82.0)
60.5
(25.0 ÷ 85.0)
45.5
(22.0 ÷ 69.0)
0.482
Waist circumference
(cm)
62.0
(57.0 ÷ 72.0)
73.0
(67.0 ÷ 81.0)
65.0
(57.5 ÷ 70.5)
65.0
(63.0 ÷ 71.5)
67.3
(60.0 ÷ 86.0)
0.002 *
Waist circumference
<90 pc 1/>90 pc 1
91.3%/8.7%73.47%/26.53%80%/20%80%/20%61.54%/38.46%0.288
* Statistically significant differences. 1 pc—percentile. 2 NBL—neuroblastoma. 3 WT—Wilms tumor.
Table 2. Risk factors for the components of metabolic syndrome in the survivors’ histories.
Table 2. Risk factors for the components of metabolic syndrome in the survivors’ histories.
Hematopoietic and Lymphoproliferative
Malignancies
NBL 1WT 2Other Solid Tumorsp
Positive family history75.51%83.33%100%57.14%0.083
Steroid therapy98%0%0%6.67%0.000 *
Hypertension7.84%6.25%58.85%0%0.000 *
Episode of acute kidney injury1.96%11.11%25%0%0.403
* Statistically significant differences. 1 NBL—neuroblastoma. 2 WT—Wilms tumor.
Table 3. Blood pressure in the control group and in the survivor groups; the median results (25Q ÷ 75Q) are provided.
Table 3. Blood pressure in the control group and in the survivor groups; the median results (25Q ÷ 75Q) are provided.
Control GroupHematopoietic and Lymphoproliferative
Malignancies
NBL 2WT 3Other Solid Tumorsp
SBP * pc 154.0
(38.0 ÷ 77.0)
68.0
(43.0 ÷ 81.0)
57.0
(43,0 ÷ 73,0)
72.5
(43,0 ÷ 78,0)
59.5
(41.0 ÷ 83.0)
0.868
DBP ** pc 188.0
(81.0 ÷ 96.0)
92.5
(72.5 ÷ 97.0)
83.0
(56.0 ÷ 89.0)
89.5
(67.0 ÷ 96.0)
92.5
(74.0 ÷ 98.0)
0.229
Blood pressure ≥ 95 pc 1 8% (2)19% (10)9% (2)12% (3)17% (3)0.647
* SBP—systolic blood pressure. ** DBP—diastolic blood pressure. 1 pc—percentile. 2 NBL—neuroblastoma. 3 WT—Wilms tumor.
Table 4. Biochemical parameters in the control group and in the survivor groups; the median results (25Q ÷ 75Q) are provided.
Table 4. Biochemical parameters in the control group and in the survivor groups; the median results (25Q ÷ 75Q) are provided.
Control GroupHematopoietic and Lymphoproliferative
Malignancies
NBL 1WT 2Other Solid Tumorsp
Salusin β
(pg/mL)
327.0
(227.0 ÷ 407.0)
100.0
(61.5 ÷ 181.5)
96.0
(72.9 ÷ 277.0)
227.5
(122.4 ÷ 333.0)
143.0
(110.8 ÷ 271.0)
0.000 *
Total cholesterol
(mg/dL)
148.0
(135.0 ÷ 171.0)
152.0
(136.0 ÷ 174.0)
162.0
(149.0 ÷ 168.0)
156.0
(145.0 ÷ 170.0)
166.5
(141.5 ÷ 188.5)
0.394
LDL 3
(mg/dL)
86.0
(71.0 ÷ 96.0)
89.0
(74.0 ÷ 106.0)
91.0
(77.0 ÷ 102.0)
87.0
(78.0 ÷ 103.0)
97.0
(79.0 ÷ 117.0)
0.513
HDL 4
(mg/dL)
50.0
(43.0 ÷ 61.0)
49.0
(43.0 ÷ 56.0)
54.0
(40.0 ÷ 60.0)
56.0
(48,0 ÷ 58,0)
51.5
(36.0 ÷ 67.0)
0.576
TG 5
(mg/dL)
69.0
(48.0 ÷ 89.0)
62.0
(50.0 ÷ 85.0)
83.0
(57.0 ÷ 91.0)
67.0
(55.0 ÷ 83.0)
79.0
(57.0 ÷ 123.0)
0.315
Glucose (mg/dL)86.0
(82.0 ÷ 89.0)
87.0
(81.0 ÷ 89.0)
82.0
(79.0 ÷ 87.0)
83.0
(81.0 ÷ 86.0)
85.0
(80.0 ÷ 88.0)
0.133
Uric acid
(mg/dL)
4.25
(3.40 ÷ 5.00)
5.00
(4.10 ÷ 5.50)
4.00
(3.80 ÷ 4.80)
4.90
(4.55 ÷ 5.40)
3.55
(3.00 ÷ 4.70)
0.001 *
Fibrinogen
(g/L)
2.48
(2.30 ÷ 2.85)
2.47
(2.26 ÷ 2.98)
2.57
(2.31 ÷ 2.96)
2.97
(2.53 ÷ 3.48)
2.82
(2.34 ÷ 2.97)
0.473
* Statistically significant differences. 1 NBL—neuroblastoma. 2 WT—Wilms tumor. 3 LDL—low-density lipoprotein. 4 HDL—high-density lipoprotein. 5 TG—triglycerides.
Table 5. Kidney parameters in the control group and in the survivor groups; the median results (25Q ÷ 75Q) are given.
Table 5. Kidney parameters in the control group and in the survivor groups; the median results (25Q ÷ 75Q) are given.
Control GroupHematopoietic and Lymphoproliferative MalignanciesNBL 4WT 5Other Solid Tumorsp
Creatinine s (mg/dL)0.530
(0.450 ÷ 0.730)
0.635
(0.520 ÷ 0.730)
0.555
(0.440 ÷ 0.640)
0.610
(0.540 ÷ 0.715)
0.665
(0.580 ÷ 0.840)
0.040 *
eGFR 1 (mL/min/1.73 m2)119.5
(98.2 ÷ 141.4)
108.4
(96.7 ÷ 123.2)
111.5
(98.8 ÷ 122.0)
104.1
(94.8 ÷ 114.3)
93.7
(78.5 ÷ 104.8)
0.009 *
eGFR 2 (mL/min/1.73 m2)98.5
(85.2 ÷ 117.0)
91.6
(84.3 ÷ 101.1)
93.4
(83.9 ÷ 99.7)
89.0
(83.7 ÷ 93.9)
79.6
(73.3 ÷ 87.1)
0.004 *
Cystatin C
(mg/L)
0.89
(0.74 ÷ 0.99)
0.77
(0.7 ÷ 0.82)
0.79
(0.7 ÷ 0.91)
0.97
(0.85 ÷ 1.13)
0.995
(0.93 ÷ 1.06)
0.000 *
eGFR 3
(mL/min/1.73 m2)
104.4
(92.7 ÷ 128.5)
122.9
(114.5 ÷ 136.8)
120.3
(101.9 ÷ 136.8)
95.4
(80.3 ÷ 110.0)
92.2
(85.8 ÷ 99.4)
0.000 *
BUN
(mg/dL)
11.0
(8.0 ÷ 12.0)
11.5
(9.6 ÷ 13,4)
13.0
(10.0 ÷ 15.0)
12.8
(11.0 ÷ 14.6)
13.3
(11.9 ÷ 16.1)
0.006 *
Albumin in urine
(mg/L)
7.4
(5.3 ÷ 10.5)
9.2
(5.0 ÷ 17.4)
12.1
(5.7 ÷ 16.0)
7.0
(5.0 ÷ 10.0)
23.4
(13.5 ÷ 93.0)
0.003 *
Creatinine u (mg/dL)117.6
(80.9 ÷ 166.2)
101.8
(53.6 ÷ 163.5)
104.3
(63.3 ÷ 130.1)
87.6
(54.7 ÷ 139.0)
85.9
(51.8 ÷ 152.1)
0.710
ACR (mg/g creatinine)7.9
(4.8 ÷ 13.1)
9.4
(5.9 ÷ 19.2)
14.8
(8.8 ÷ 17.8)
9.2
(7.4 ÷ 15.1)
24.8
(16.6 ÷ 86.7)
0.018 *
* Statistically significant differences. 1 eGFR based on the revised Schwartz equation. 2 eGFR based on the creatinine and BUN equation. 3 eGFR based on the Filler equation. 4 NBL—neuroblastoma. 5 WT—Wilms tumor. s serum. u urine.
Table 6. Kidney parameters according to ultrasound in the control group and in the survivor groups.
Table 6. Kidney parameters according to ultrasound in the control group and in the survivor groups.
Control GroupHematopoietic and Lymphoproliferative
Malignancies
NBL 2WT 3Other Solid Tumorsp
Left kidney pc 1 (age)<2.5—0%
2.5–10—0%
10–25—8%
25–50—20%
50—0%
50–75—0%
75—4%
75–90—24%
90–97.5—12%
>97.5—8%
<2.5—2.7%
2.5–10—0%
10–25—2.7%
25–50—35.1%
50—0%
50–75—18.9%
75—2.7%
75–90—16.2%
90–97.5—5.4%
>97.5—16.2%
<2.5—0%
2.5–10—9.1%
10–25—9.1%
25–50—18.2%
50—0%
50–75—18.2%
75—9.1%
75–90—18.2%
90–97.5—9.1%
>97.5—9.1%
<2.5—9.1%
2.5–10—0%
10–25—0%
25–50—0%
50—0%
50–75—9.1%
75—0%
75–90—0%
90–97.5—0%
>97.5—81.8%
<2.5—28.6%
2.5–10—7.1%
10–25—14.3%
25–50—14.3%
50—7.1%
50–75—0%
75—0%
75–90—14.3%
90–97.5—0%
>97.5—14.3%
0.001 *
Left kidney pc 1 (height)<2.5—0%
2.5–10—0%
10—0%
10–25—4%
25–50—24%
50–75—28%
75–90—28%
90–97.5—16%
>97.5—0%
<2.5—2.6%
2.5–10—0%
10—0%
10–25—5.3%
25–50—28.9%
50–75—21.1%
75–90—13.2%
90–97.5—15.8%
>97.5—13.2%
<2.5—25%
2.5–10—0%
10—0%
10–25—0%
25–50—13.6%
50–75—17.4%
75–90—7.7%
90–97.5—8.3%
>97.5—5.9%
<2.5—9.1%
2.5–10—0%
10—0%
10–25—0%
25–50—0%
50–75—18.2%
75–90—0%
90–97.5—0%
>97.5—72.7%
<2.5—7.1%
2.5–10—7.1%
10—7.1%
10–25—21.4%
25–50—14.3%
50–75—14.3%
75–90—0%
90–97.5—7.1%
>97.5—21.4%
0.001 *
Right kidney pc 1 (age)<2.5—0%
2.5–10—0%
10–25—4%
25–50—28%
50–75—12%
75—4%
75–90—28%
90—4%
90–97.5—12%
>97.5—8%
<2.5—2.6%
2.5–10—0%
10–25—2.6%
25–50—18.4%
50–75—28.9%
75—0%
75–90—21.1%
90—2.6%
90–97.5—13.2%
>97.5—10.5%
<2.5—10%
2.5–10—0%
10–25—0%
25–50—10%
50–75—20%
75—0%
75–90—10%
90—0%
90–97.5—40%
>97.5—10%
<2.5—9.1%
2.5–10—0%
10–25—0%
25–50—9.1%
50–75—0%
75—0%
75–90—9.0%
90—0%
90–97.5—0%
>97.5—72.7%
<2.5—14.3%
2.5–10—7.2%
10–25—21.4%
25–50—14.3%
50–75—14.3%
75—0%
75–90—0%
90—0%
90–97.5—0%
>97.5—28.6%
0.002 *
Right kidney pc 1 (height)<2.5—0%
2.5–10—4%
10—0%
10–25—12%
25–50—8%
50–75—24%
75–90—40%
90–97.5—4%
>97.5—8%
<2.5—2.6%
2.5–10—0%
10—0%
10–25—7.9%
25–50—39.5%
50–75—7.9%
75–90—23.7%
90–97.5—13.2%
>97.5—5.3%
<2.5—0%
2.5–10—8.3%
10—16.7%
10–25—0%
25–50—33.3%
50–75—8.3%
75–90—6.7%
90–97.5—16.7%
>97.5—0%
<2.5—0%
2.5–10—9.1%
10—%
10–25—0%
25–50—0%
50–75—0%
75–90—9.1%
90–97.5—0%
>97.5—81.8%
<2.5—14.3%
2.5–10—21.4%
10—0%
10–25—7.1%
25–50—21.4%
50–75—7.1%
75–90—14.3%
90–97.5—7.1%
>97.5—7.1%
0.000 *
RI of the left kidney 0.61
(0.60 ÷ 0.66)
0.65
(0.62 ÷ 0.68)
0.63
(0.60 ÷ 0.65)
0.67
(0.59 ÷ 0.70)
0.64
(0.60 ÷ 0.67)
0.275
RI of the right kidney 0.62
(0.60 ÷ 0.66)
0.64
(0.60 ÷ 0.66)
0.62
(0.61 ÷ 0.65)
0.65
(0.60 ÷ 0.67)
0.64
(0.62 ÷ 0.66)
0.588
* Statistically significant differences. In brackets—median results (25Q ÷ 75Q). 1 pc—percentile. 2 NBL—neuroblastoma. 3 WT—Wilms tumor.
Table 7. Components of metabolic syndrome.
Table 7. Components of metabolic syndrome.
Metabolic SyndromeObesity + HDL ≤ 40 mg/dLObesity + Elevated Blood Pressure Obesity + TG ≥ 150 mg/dLHDL ≤ 40 md/dL + TG ≥ 150 mg/dLElevated Blood Pressure + glc ≥ 100 md/dLElevated Blood Pressure + HDL ≤ 40 md/dL
Patients 29
WT 1
Hepatoblastoma 1
ALL 2
NBL 2
RMS 1
NHL 1
Medulloblastoma 1
4
ALL 3
NBL 1
1
ALL
1
NBL
1
ALL
0
Control group0100001
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Janecka, A.; Stefanowicz, J.; Owczarzak, A.; Tomaszewski, M.; Batko, T.; Irga-Jaworska, N. Assessment of Metabolic Syndrome and Kidney and Heart Function in Childhood Cancer Survivors. Children 2023, 10, 1073. https://doi.org/10.3390/children10061073

AMA Style

Janecka A, Stefanowicz J, Owczarzak A, Tomaszewski M, Batko T, Irga-Jaworska N. Assessment of Metabolic Syndrome and Kidney and Heart Function in Childhood Cancer Survivors. Children. 2023; 10(6):1073. https://doi.org/10.3390/children10061073

Chicago/Turabian Style

Janecka, Aleksandra, Joanna Stefanowicz, Anna Owczarzak, Marek Tomaszewski, Tomasz Batko, and Ninela Irga-Jaworska. 2023. "Assessment of Metabolic Syndrome and Kidney and Heart Function in Childhood Cancer Survivors" Children 10, no. 6: 1073. https://doi.org/10.3390/children10061073

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop