Next Article in Journal
Profiling Experiences of Bullying in the Elementary School: The Role of Gender
Previous Article in Journal
Preterm Birth, Developmental Smoke/Nicotine Exposure, and Life-Long Pulmonary Sequelae
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Children
Volume 10
Issue 4
10.3390/children10040609
children-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Non-Intrusive Maternal Style as a Mediator between Playfulness and Children’s Development for Low-Income Chilean Adolescent Mothers

by
Laura Léniz-Maturana
1,*,
Rosa Vilaseca
1 and
David Leiva
2
1
Department of Cognition, Development and Educational Psychology, Universitat de Barcelona, 08007 Barcelona, Spain
2
Department of Social Psychology and Quantitative Psychology, Universitat de Barcelona, 08007 Barcelona, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Children 2023, 10(4), 609; https://doi.org/10.3390/children10040609
Submission received: 24 February 2023 / Revised: 16 March 2023 / Accepted: 21 March 2023 / Published: 23 March 2023
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The aim of this study was to describe the relationship between low-income Chilean adolescent maternal playfulness and mothers’ non-intrusiveness in their children’s development and to analyze whether a mother’s non-intrusiveness mediates the relationship between maternal playfulness and children’s development. The Parental Playfulness Scale and the Subscale of Intrusiveness from the Early Head Start Research and Evaluation Project were used to assess maternal playfulness and mothers’ non-intrusiveness respectively. Ages and Stages Questionnaire 3rd Edition (ASQ-3) was applied to measure the children’s communication, gross and fine motor skills, problem-solving and personal–social development. The sample consisted of 79 mother–child dyads with children aged 10–24 months (M = 15.5, SD = 4.2) and their mothers aged 15–21 years old (M = 19.1, SD = 1.7). A bivariate analysis showed that maternal playfulness was significantly associated with communication, fine motor, problem-solving and personal–social development. Moreover, higher levels of communication, fine motor skills and problem-solving development were observed in the children of less intrusive mothers. Maternal playfulness had a significant effect on children’s development of language, problem-solving and personal–social skills when their mothers showed less intrusiveness during interaction. These findings contribute to the understanding of the interaction between adolescent mothers and their children. Active play and less intrusiveness can enhance child development.

1. Introduction

Adolescent mothers and their children have been studied by diverse authors due to the social problems that adolescent motherhood entails for the socioeconomic future of those mothers and for their children’s development outcomes [1,2,3,4,5,6,7]. Latin America has the second-highest number of adolescent mothers and motherhood in adolescence is more frequent in low-income countries [8]. Chile is one of the Latin American countries in which adolescent pregnancies have decreased [9]; however, these pregnancies are still mainly found among the poorest women in the country [10]. Biobío is one of the regions with the highest poverty rates in Chile, with a significant difference in the average poverty gap with respect to Chile’s other regions [11]. Meanwhile, the number of adolescent mothers whose rights have been infringed in this region is higher than that reported in Chile globally [12]. Therefore, it could be useful to determine the context of adolescent motherhood and child development in the Biobío region in Chile, since it has been shown that Chilean adolescent mothers need support in parenting [13] due to their lack of the sufficient maturity to face the responsibilities of motherhood [14,15,16].
The social and economic obstacles that adolescent mothers face explain why the maternal behavior of Chilean mothers is stronger in older women than in younger women [17]. Notably, it has been shown that low-income adolescent mothers have lower engagement and are more withdrawn with their children [18], which affects the parent–child relationship. From this perspective, origins in a socially disadvantaged sector characterized by poverty could explain why child development levels are lower than in children born to older mothers [1,19,20]. Furthermore, adolescent mothers tend to be unaware of the precise age at which certain developmental milestones should appear [3,21]. This affects the way they promote their children’s development and could lead to a lower level of cognitive, linguistic, and social development outcomes. Previous literature has shown that children born to adolescent mothers have greater socioemotional problems than adult mothers [5,6]. Likewise, in a study carried out by Firk [7], it was discussed that the cognitive development of children of adolescent mothers may be affected by the socioeconomic risk to which they are exposed in comparison with the children of adult mothers. However, the aforementioned authors affirm that positive maternal interactive behaviors can be important mediators and can have a significant effect on child development. In fact, it has been found that adolescent mothers under-stimulate verbal development, which explains why their children present lower levels of expressive and receptive language, attributed to high intrusiveness in dyadic interactions [22].
It is well known that maternal intrusiveness is characterized by excessive control of the child’s activities during an interaction, with mothers imposing their own will while children are playing and preventing their children from following their own pace [23]. On the one hand, high maternal intrusiveness has been associated with higher levels of children’s negative emotional behaviors [24] and lower levels of children’s cognitive development outcomes [25]. However, low intrusiveness can predict a higher level of children’s expressive language [26]. In contrast, playfulness, characterized by an interaction between mothers and children in which curiosity and creativity are promoted, has been related to better vocabulary skills and children’s emotional self-regulation [27]. In addition, according to Creaghe and Kidd [28], when children are playing make believe, a significant context is created for communicative development and sociocognitive processes. Scientific evidence has shown that adolescent mothers participate less in playing [18] and are more intrusive with their children than adult mothers [29]. For a better understanding of this issue, it is important to further investigate the concepts of maternal playfulness and intrusiveness and how they are related to child development.

1.1. Theoretical Framework

1.1.1. Playfulness and Children’s Development

Playfulness is defined as parenting behavior whose willingness to play includes creativity and fun as components that stimulate cognitive development, generating enjoyment for the child [30]. Specifically, playfulness produces in children a state of mind that promotes reflective thinking, imagination, humor and curiosity [31]. Many studies have shown the impact of children’s playfulness on their development. In research carried out by Quinn et al. [32], it was shown that interactive play promoted imagination and the use of gestures between caregivers and children contributed to the development of the children’s communication skills, understanding and productive language [33]. Likewise, there is evidence that young children who perform pretend play are more likely to demonstrate higher skills in the development of executive functions [34]. Notably, playfulness contributes to children’s social and emotional development. It has been found that play decreases levels of emotional distress, is associated with self-regulation, and facilitates transitions to new experiences [35]. One possible cause of the association between playfulness and social development is that children interpret and represent roles that lead them to regulate their own behavior to adapt to different contexts and contribute to expanding their vocabulary and narrative skills [36]. The link between playfulness and language development can be seen in the relationship between babbling and complex symbolic action [37], that is, the development of thought through images, symbols and the representation of ideas with gestures and vocalizations. For this reason, the game benefits children’s learning in terms of acquiring greater vocabulary, improving expression and understanding language that allows them to acquire new words [28].
Although previous research has been based on the interconnection between playfulness and cognitive, linguistic and social development, there is also evidence of a direct relationship between play and children’s motor development. According to Trevlas [38], playfulness and motor skills could be associated because movement is a natural action in early childhood, one that considers the learning and development expressed in playful activities. However, most of the studies that have analyzed associations with playfulness that include movement—some of them observed in mother–child interactions—have been carried out with samples of children with disabilities [39,40,41].
Considering the close correlation between playfulness and child development and its beneficial implications [42], existing knowledge should be extended by focusing on adolescent mothers, since their situation might be challenging for the reasons outlined below. Various authors have stated that low socioeconomic status in adolescent mothers interferes with the quality of the dyadic interaction between mothers and their children, which affects child development [7,15,16,23]. In a context of high indices of social and economic vulnerability, such as those experienced by the majority of Chilean adolescent mothers, there is less probability of providing cognitive stimulation according to the children’s characteristics and needs. This may result in negative parenting [43].
From this perspective, maternal playfulness has been associated with a higher level of warmth and sensitivity on the part of the mother [44]. A high level of intrusiveness has been linked to a low level of maternal playfulness [31]. It is well known that intrusion is negatively associated with a mother’s warmth, sensitivity and the use of positive regard towards their children [45,46]. These qualities are positively correlated with children’s reading and writing skills in later years [47] and with children’s social behavior [48]. However, despite the association between high maternal sensitivity and low maternal intrusiveness, mothers may display aspects of both in varying amounts depending on the context, so it is crucial to analyze low maternal intrusiveness independently of maternal sensitivity in a playful interaction, as in the Broomel study, to analyze its association with children’s development outcomes [49].

1.1.2. Maternal Intrusiveness

As Ainsworth et al. [50] originally explained, intrusion is behavior in which mothers do not respond to their children’s cues and interests and do not promote infant autonomy and maternal sensitivity. This leads to interruptions and actions that focus on their own goals and not those of their children. In addition, intrusiveness is characterized by behavior in which mothers are overly controlling and overly involved during the interaction with their child [51]. In contrast, a mother’s non-intrusiveness refers to her ability to be available to her child by avoiding excessive stimulation or interfering with her child’s autonomy [31]. It has been found that Latino parents tend to be more authoritarian, controlling and overemphasize obedience and respect as important parenting factors. These variables are considered priorities for socialization [52]. Hence, a mother’s non-intrusion has been associated with better social levels of the child [53]. Inversely, negative, intrusive parenting is associated with lower performance in children’s cognitive development [26] and communication. A disruption in language learning can inhibit children with ambiguous or infrequent communication, which leads to a loss of opportunities for a child’s response [54]. It can be appreciated that intrusiveness may affect various areas of children’s development, especially social skills [55,56,57].
However, unlike playfulness, the evidence of an association between motor development results and maternal intrusiveness is scarce. Fine motor development has been associated with positive parenting behavior [58]. Therefore, it would be interesting to analyze whether low-income adolescent mothers’ non-intrusiveness is an important mediator of playful interaction with their children and their developmental outcomes, since maternal intrusion has generally been associated with negative child behavior [31,59]. As mentioned above, a mother’s non-intrusiveness avoids interfering with child autonomy [31], while parental behaviors that promote a child’s autonomy are related to adaptive child development, children’s executive function, sustained attention and emotional development [60,61,62]. In young mothers, it has been found that, depending on psychosocial factors, they may be more likely to over-stimulate and interrupt when a child is playing. They are prone to focus on their own interests and to prohibit their child’s activities [63]. Despite this, to the best of our knowledge, there have been no studies examining the impact that maternal playfulness may have on the development of Chilean children born of adolescent mothers, when they are non-intrusive in a dyadic interaction with their children. This gap in knowledge is relevant, particularly because previous research has addressed the impact of parenting intrusiveness on low-income children’s development in play interactions [24,26,64]. In turn, due to the high risk of vulnerability among adolescent mothers, it is useful to study aspects that contribute to supporting their parental behavior in order to optimize the development of their children [65]. Adolescent mother–child dyads form part of a group that requires special attention in Chile, since it has been shown that exposure to an environment of high social and economic vulnerability leads to a lack of cognitive stimulation, which affects children’s learning development [44,66].

1.2. Current Study

This study aimed to describe maternal playfulness and Chilean adolescent mothers’ non-intrusiveness during free play situations at home with typically developing children. The objective was to analyze the relationship between these maternal behaviors and their children’s development. The specific aims were to analyze the relationship between low-income Chilean adolescent mothers’ playfulness and non-intrusiveness and their children’s communication, gross and fine motor skills, problem-solving and personal–social development; and to explore whether mothers’ non-intrusiveness mediates the relationship between maternal playfulness and their children’s development. Therefore, the current study investigated the following research questions and hypotheses.
  • Are maternal playfulness and mothers’ non-intrusiveness related to their children’s development in Chilean dyads? We hypothesize that higher scores for maternal playfulness would be positively associated with a lower level of non-intrusiveness in adolescent mothers. In turn, this would be significantly related to children’s greater communication, problem-solving and personal–social development.
  • Does Chilean adolescent mothers’ non-intrusiveness mediate maternal playfulness and is it related to their children’s development? We expect a mediated relationship of maternal playfulness and development via non-intrusiveness. In this regard, we hypothesize a negative relationship between playfulness and intrusiveness, which in turn will be negatively associated with children’s developmental outcomes.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Design

The current study was carried out using a descriptive observational approach (i.e., a correlational approach) based on a cross-sectional design. The participants were 42 boys (53%) and 37 girls (47%) aged two years or younger (10–24 months) (M = 15.5, SD = 4.2) with mothers aged from 15 to 21 years old (M = 19.1, SD = 1.7). The eligibility criteria were as follows: mothers who had become pregnant at 19 years old or younger, and children with typical development aged from 10 to 24 months.

2.2. Recruitment to the Study

Children and their mothers were recruited from seven family health centers, four day care learning centers, one residential home that receives homeless adolescent mothers, and one hospital, from provinces in Biobío Region in Chile. The coordinators of these institutions were contacted by e-mail and telephone and informed of the nature of the study. Subsequently, after being asked to screen the dyads’ eligibility, they provided personal information that included telephone and e-mail to contact the participants, and the dates of birth of children and their mothers, in accordance with the inclusion criteria. Mothers who agreed to participate were visited at home and were informed of the nature of the research. Those aged 18 or older signed an informed consent form and those below this age an informed assent form; in the latter case, their legal guardians provided an informed consent.

2.3. Procedure

One researcher visited all recruited dyads at home. Firstly, the ASQ-3 was applied to assess whether children performed the behavior indicated in the items of the areas of the instrument. The following instruction was given: “We will read each question and verify whether your child performs the activity, performs it sometimes, or doesn’t perform it yet”. ASQ-3 was completed in around 10–15 min. Subsequently, mothers were invited to play with their infants for 10 min and were informed that the session was recorded. The following instruction was given in Spanish: “Interact and play with your children as you typically do”. Then, videotaped observations of mother–child interactions were obtained during 10 min of free play using the “Three bag task” [67] that included books, toys for pretend play, and age-appropriate manipulative toys such as teddy bears, dolls, building blocks, cars and puzzles. The Parental Playfulness Scale [31] and the Subscale of Intrusiveness from the Early Head Start Research and Evaluation Project [68] were then used to score mother–child interactions in these videotaped sessions, which were later coded in the researchers’ computers. Figure 1 shows the number of participants who were initially selected for the analysis of the results, the reasons for exclusions, and the final number of participants.

2.4. Ethical Statement

The study was approved by the Health Service of Concepción and the Health Service of Biobío, in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (1964 and subsequent updates) and the Guidelines for Good Clinical Practice (GCP).

2.5. Instruments

2.5.1. Parental Playfulness Scale

Maternal playfulness was coded using the Parental Playfulness Scale [32] through the observation of free play activities in 10-min videos. This tool evaluates the degree to which parents display creativity, curiosity, imagination and simulation when interacting with their children in a play context. The instrument is coded on a 7-point Likert-type scale rated from 1 (no playfulness) to 7 (high levels of creative play). Specifically, a score of 1 is given when it is not observed beyond brief verbal directives, or if mothers do not play, show no signs of creativity, or do not interact. A score of 2 means that parents spent most of the time labeling objects and there are few instances of concrete play. A score of 3 indicates that parents give commands about how to use the toys in a conventional manner. A mid-scale score of 4 is coded if half of the playful interaction is concrete and the other half is imaginary. A score of 5 indicates that imaginary play takes up most of the time of interaction. A score of 6 is coded when the mother adds creativity to the interactions, with imaginary play being an important quality and 7 means that parents spend most of the time in pretend play using the toys in an unconventional way. Two trained investigators jointly coded the videotapes. Inter-rater reliability for this research was calculated from 25% of observations, yielding an inter-rater agreement estimate of 0.85. In this sample, observed maternal playfulness ranged from 1 to 6 (Mdn = 3.0, IQR = 3.0).

2.5.2. The Subscale of Intrusiveness from Early Head Start Research and Evaluation Project

The Subscale of Intrusiveness from the Early Head Start Research and Evaluation Project: Child–Parent Interaction Rating Scales for the Three-Bag Assessment [68] was used to assess the mothers’ non-intrusiveness. Intrusiveness is defined as the control exerted by mothers focused on themselves instead of recognizing the needs and interests of their child. The item is scored on a 7-point Likert scale from 1 (very low intrusiveness) to 7 (very high intrusiveness). A score of 1 means that there are no signs of intrusive behavior in any maternal behavior. A score of 2 indicates low intrusiveness in which only a few instances of intrusive maternal behavior are observed. A score of 3 shows moderately low intrusiveness and mothers may initiate some interactions with their children that are not welcome, as shown by the children protesting or responding defensively to their mothers. Mothers may continue the activity after their children respond defensively. A score of 4 refers to moderate intrusiveness, that is, mothers may intrude abruptly on the child or show mild intrusiveness during the play interaction. A score of 5 means moderately high intrusiveness in which children have little opportunity during the play interaction to do anything on their own. A score of 6 corresponds to high intrusiveness in which mothers strongly deny the children the opportunity to perform activities by themselves. In this case, the children have few opportunities to experience autonomy. A score of 7 is very high intrusiveness and it means that the majority of the play interaction time is marked by the mothers completely controlling and allowing the children almost no self-direction in their activities. In the current study, 25% of mother–child interactions were coded by two trained observers. Inter-rater reliability agreement was 0.80. In this sample, the mothers’ intrusiveness score was from 1 to 5 (Mdn = 2.0, IQR = 1.0).

2.5.3. Ages and Stages Questionnaire

The Spanish version of the Ages and Stages Questionnaire—3rd Edition (ASQ-3) [69] is a caregiver-completed questionnaire including 30 questions from 5 areas: communication (comprehensive and expressive language), gross motor skills (proximal movements and big muscle groups), fine motor skills (coordination and movements that include small and distal muscles), problem-solving (cognitive skills that include play and learning), and personal–social skills (a child’s self-help skills and interactions with others) based on milestones that should be achieved from birth to 60 months. Each area has 6 items, and for each item one of three possible responses is coded: 10 (yes), 5 (sometimes) or 0 (not yet). The response must be chosen depending on whether the child can perform a certain task. The score is obtained from the sum of their responses, and higher scores indicate better children’s development. The questionnaires were divided by the child’s biological age, given that there are series of questionnaires appropriate for different age ranges. Specifically, each child must be evaluated according to their biological age, which is the criterion for choosing the appropriate questionnaire. Thus, in this study, children’s developmental scores were transformed into Z scores for a common metric and differences in cut-off scores were avoided according to age ranges established in the instrument. For this sample, it was decided to have the questionnaire completed by mothers, but it was read and all items were checked by a member of the research team that visited them at home, as recommended by Small [70], to prevent any comprehension difficulties resulting from the mothers’ low literacy level. ASQ-3 has been validated in Chile [71] and has been recommended by UNICEF. In multinational studies, it has shown reliability = 94%, sensitivity = 88% and specificity = 82.5% [72]. In this sample, reliability was demonstrated by a Cronbach’s α of 0.73.

2.6. Data Analysis

Statistical analyses were calculated to describe the sample and the empirical distribution of the relevant variables in the study.
To address the first research question linked to the relationship between maternal playfulness, mothers’ non-intrusiveness and children’s development (communication, gross motor, fine motor, problem-solving and personal–social), non-parametric tests were carried out based on Kendall’s correlations. Additionally, 95% confidence intervals for all association indices were estimated using BCa Bootstrap with 5000 resamples.
Regarding the second research question, mediation models based on regression as described in Hayes [73] were estimated to assess the mediator role of mothers’ non-intrusiveness in the relationship between maternal playfulness and children’s development. More specifically, five mediation models were conducted to examine the mediation process for each dependent variable corresponding to the areas of ASQ-3 (communication, gross motor, fine motor, problem-solving and personal–social development). All the hypotheses about the pathways (i.e., direct and indirect effects) involved in the mediation models were tested using 95% BCa bootstrap CIs with 5000 replications. Statistical analyses were carried out using CI PROCESS [73] IBM SPSS version 27 for Windows, and R version 4.2.2.

3. Results

Seventy-nine dyads participated in this study. Specifically, fifty-six children resided with their mothers and grandparents (71%), seventeen children resided with their mother, father and grandparents (21%), and only 8%, corresponding to six children, resided with their fathers and mothers. Most mothers received childcare support provided by their children’s grandmothers (78%, n = 62) and only 28 children (35%) attended a preschool center. More than half of the mothers had completed high school (62%, n = 49), 29% had completed primary school (n = 23), and less than half of the mothers had not completed primary (9%, n = 7). From this group, 14% corresponds to mothers who dropped out of school due to maternity. Most of the mothers were not working (81%). On average, families reported a monthly income of 509.2 (USD), ranging from 108 to 678 (USD) (SD = 171.3). Thus, considering the criteria of the Chilean Association of Market Researchers 2019 [74] this sample was composed of mid- to low-income (678.49 USD or less) and low-income (391.16 USD or less) dyads. The results of this study are presented below.
Research Question 1: Are maternal playfulness and Chilean adolescent mothers’ non-intrusiveness related to their children’s development?
Table 1 shows the mean, SD, minimum and maximum ASQ-3 raw scores for each area of children’s development. In general, relatively low scores can be seen, except for personal–social development, considering the interval ranges of the instrument expected of children with typical development.
As reported in Table 2, the scores of the Parental Playfulness Scale and the Subscale of Intrusiveness were negatively related. The strength of the relationship was moderate (Τ = −0.4, p < 0.001; 95% CI = (−0.548; −0.232)). Moreover, maternal playfulness was significantly correlated to children’s communication (Τ = 0.3, p < 0.001; 95% CI = (0.082; 0.409)), fine motor (Τ = 0.2, p = 0.045; 95% CI = (0.014; −0.313)), problem-solving (Τ = 0.2, p = 0.041; 95% CI = (0.029; 0.328)), and personal–social development (Τ = 0.2, p = 0.005; 95% CI = (0.074; 0.374)). In turn, communication (Τ = −0.3, p = 0.004; 95% CI = (−0.408; −0.068)), fine motor (Τ = −0.2, p = 0.009; 95% CI = (−0.384; −0.067)) and problem-solving development (Τ = −0.3, p = 0.002; 95% CI = (−0.399; −0.101)) were negatively associated with mothers’ intrusiveness.
Research Question 2: Does Chilean adolescent mothers’ non-intrusiveness mediate maternal playfulness and its impact on their children’s development?
Table 3 includes all estimated arcs of the models for maternal playfulness on the five children’s development areas (communication, gross motor, fine motor, problem-solving, and personal–social development) mediated by mothers’ intrusiveness. Figure 1, Figure 2, Figure 3, Figure 4 and Figure 5 specify the direct effects of maternal playfulness on the mediating variable: mothers’ intrusiveness (a1). Moreover, they indicate the effects of the mediating variable (mothers’ intrusiveness) on the child development area of ASQ-3 (b1). The c’ path represents the direct effect of maternal playfulness on children’s development, while controlling for the mediated effects. Notably, in the mediation model, the total effect of maternal playfulness on children’s development (i.e., the c term) was estimated as the sum between estimates c’ and the indirect effect (a1b1).
Model 1 showed that the direct effect of maternal playfulness (c′ = 0.14, p = 0.08; 95% CI = (−0.02–0.30)) and the indirect effects on children’s communication mediated via mothers’ intrusiveness (a1b1 = 0.08; 95% BCa-CI = (−0.0007–0.15)) were non-significant. However, the total effect yielded a significant result (c = 0.21; 95% CI = (0.07–0.35)). This model accounted for 14.0% of the variance of the ASQ-3 communication development scores (see Figure 2).
Model 2 indicated that the direct effect between maternal playfulness and children’s gross motor development was not significant (c′ = 0.11, p = 0.19; 95% CI = (−0.06–0.28)) for the indirect effects via mothers’ intrusiveness (a1b1 = −0.06; 95% BCa-CI = (−0.30–0.17)) or for the total effect (c = 0.13; 95% CI = (−0.01–0.28)). Moreover, this model had low predictive capacity, accounting for 4.0% of the variance. Therefore, it cannot be considered useful for predicting children’s gross motor development (See Figure 3).
Model 3 shows that the direct effect between maternal playfulness and children’s fine motor development was different to zero but not significant (c′ = 0.07, p = 0.37; 95% CI = (−0.09–0.24)) Nevertheless, for indirect effects via mothers’ intrusiveness (a1b1 = 0.07; 95% BCa-CI = (−0.004–0.16)) and total effect (c = 0.15; 95% CI = (0.001–0.29)) the results were significant. Predictive capacity accounted for 9.0% of the variance of the ASQ-3 score’s fine motor area (See Figure 4).
The direct effect between maternal playfulness and children’s problem-solving indicated in Model 4 was not significant (c′ = 0.07, p = 0.36; 95% CI = (−0.09–0.23)). However, the indirect effects via mother’s intrusiveness (a1b1 = 0.09; 95% BCa-CI = (0.02–0.19)) and the total effect (c = 0.16; 95% CI = (0.02–0.31)) were significant. This model had a predictive capacity that accounted for 13.0% of the variance of the ASQ-3 problem-solving development scores (See Figure 5).
Both the direct (c′ = 0.24, p = 0.004; 95% CI = (0.08–0.40)) and the total effect (c = 0.22; 95% CI = (0.08–0.35)) between maternal playfulness and children’s personal–social development specified in Model 5 were significant. However, the indirect effect via mother’s intrusiveness (a1b1 = −0.23; 95% BCa CI = (−0.10–0.045)) was not significant. This model presented a predictive capacity that accounted for 11.0% of the variance of the ASQ-3 personal–social development scores (See Figure 6).

4. Discussion

The purpose of this study was to analyze the relationship between low-income Chilean adolescents’ maternal playfulness and mothers’ non-intrusiveness, and their children’s development. The objective was also to examine whether children’s development could be predicted by maternal playfulness when their mother’s intrusiveness was lower. Our findings indicate that there is a close association between maternal playfulness and mothers’ intrusiveness. This result is similar to a study carried out by Menashe and Atzaba-Poria [30] in which maternal playfulness was assessed with the Parental Playfulness Scale [31] in low-income adult mothers and was related to lower levels of intrusiveness. Additionally, the authors found that mothers, on average, showed moderate levels of playfulness. A similar result was found in a study carried out by Cabrera et al. [27]. As expected, the mean score for playfulness in the sample of the current study was lower than in the other previously indicated studies. This result can be explained as it is well known that the quality of adolescent mother–child interactions may be affected by several demographic challenges associated with the poverty that they face [74]. This leads to adolescent mothers having greater difficulty in bonding with their child [75] and being less involved in playing with their children [18]. In turn, the difficulties they face may lead to emotional problems in adolescent mothers that could imply more intrusive mother–child interactions [76]. Interestingly, the level of intrusiveness of adolescent mothers in this sample was relatively low, in contrast to previous studies that have found higher levels of intrusiveness in adolescent mothers [29]. Usually, demographic risks could influence higher levels of mothers’ intrusiveness [77]. Although this sample was composed of low-income dyads, we did not analyze risk variables such as maltreatment, abuse or neglect that typically form part of this vulnerable group [78] and which are associated with higher levels of maternal intrusiveness [79]. Thus, these factors should be examined in future studies of adolescent mothers in order to assess the possible impact of the quality of support in childcare, since in this sample most of the adolescent mothers reported receiving support from their family. However, this variable was not assessed.
We also tested whether maternal playfulness and mothers’ non-intrusiveness were related to their children’s development. Our results show that mothers who were more playful and less intrusive had children with higher levels of communication, fine motor and problem-solving development than mothers who were less playful and more intrusive. These results are in line with Yogman et al. [80], who indicated that a nurturing relationship between parents and children can be better established through play, to optimize children’s cognitive, language and social skills. Particularly, previous evidence has demonstrated that parental play interaction has a significant impact on children’s cognitive development [81] and pretend play has a positive effect on the executive functions of children, unlike other types of play [82]. In this context, imaginative play may be considered a positive instance of developing executive functions [83], as play encourages children’s imagination and memory, and is essential for the development of thinking [84]. Cognitive skills such as executive function and attentional control are also linked to lower levels of mothers’ intrusiveness [85], which is concordant with our results. This aspect is reasonable, because maternal intrusiveness tends to be negatively related to free play and predicts lower levels of children’s attention [86].
It should be noted that the fact that pretend play is related to cognitive skills, including symbolic understanding [87], could explain why we found that maternal playfulness was also associated with children’s communication development. The relationship between play and language development is in the ability of children to use and understand symbols [88], which shows that symbolic play is significantly linked to expressive and receptive language. In fact, in the study carried out by Cabrera et al. [27], the authors indicate that the advantage of play is that it encourages children to learn to understand and say new words. As in our results, they found that parental playfulness was related to language, specifically in mothers when fathers showed higher levels of parental playfulness. Moreover, our results are also similar to other studies, which found that when mothers and fathers had higher levels of intrusiveness during play interactions with their children, the children showed lower levels of expressive language [51,89]. We did not analyze father–child interactions and their relationship with children’s development, given that in the Chilean context some adolescent fathers do not reside with their child [90], as in our sample. However, our findings add to the literature by providing evidence that adolescent mothers may enhance their children’s development when playful and less intrusive interactions with their children are promoted.
We found that maternal playfulness was related to fine motor skills but not gross motor skills. Even though gross locomotion movements are used in children’s play, they are usually referred to as physical play (i.e., walking, crawling and rolling) [91], a variable that we did not analyze in the interaction between mothers and children in our study. However, both maternal playfulness and mothers’ non-intrusiveness were related to children’s fine motor development. In parent–child interactions, as measured by three-bag tasks, it has been found that fine motor skills can be improved when there is high-quality early parenting [92]. Under this perspective, this study provides evidence of the importance of playfulness and non-intrusiveness on children’s motor development to the increasing literature about parenting in adolescent mothers.
Regarding the relationship between maternal playfulness and personal–social development, which refers to a child’s self-help skills and interactions with others, our results were concordant with a study carried out by Choi and Kim [93] that found that playfulness influences children’s social skills. It is well known that when children are playing, they assume different roles and thus learn about social interactions [94]. In this sense, our results indicate that maternal playfulness in adolescent mothers is generally an important factor in children’s personal–social development. This could occur because when parents accept that children are active protagonists in their play, then they have autonomy over their activities. This is one of the most empowering experiences a child may have [95] and one which enhances their social and self-help skills. Interestingly, mother’s intrusiveness was not significantly linked to better personal–social development in this research. In contrast, some studies have concluded that intrusive parenting is associated with lower levels of social abilities [96,97]. Nevertheless, previous literature that has studied adolescent motherhood has found that maternal mental health is a relevant factor in the social and emotional development of their children [98,99], which could be a key indicator to further analyze the relationship of personal–social development with maternal factors in Chilean adolescent mothers. Despite this fact, mothers’ non-intrusiveness was an important mediator in the relationship between maternal playfulness and children’s development, including personal–social development in this study.
The findings of our study indicate that maternal playfulness in adolescent mothers has a significant effect on most measured levels of child development, notably communication, fine motor, problem-solving and personal–social development. However, despite the fact that, in general, the association between maternal playfulness and children’s development was seen to be relatively low, the mothers’ non-intrusiveness played a buffering role. This finding aligns with previous research that has shown the negative association between parental intrusiveness and child development [22,30,60,61,62]. Thus, our results highlight the importance of examining intrusiveness in contexts of mothers at high risk of social and economic vulnerability. The youngest Chilean mothers and their children are a particularly interesting field of study, because it has been demonstrated that parental skills in mothers are relatively lower than in older mothers with higher socioeconomic status [17].

Limitations and Future Directions for Research

The present study extends the current literature on adolescent mothers’ interactions with their typically developing children. Nevertheless, the study has some limitations that should be considered when the results are interpreted. First, the sample was not probabilistic. The procedure used to recruit the mothers in this sample may have been conditioned by the willingness to participate. [100]. Conceivably, the mothers who agreed to participate in this study were probably the most informed and the most involved in childrearing.
The small sample size may have compromised the statistical power of the tests used in the present study. However, power analyses showed that a sample size of 84 participants would be necessary to detect moderate correlations (r = 0.3, significance = 0.05, and power = 0.80). In addition, post-hoc power analyses for a sample size of 79 participants showed that the statistical power for detecting moderate bivariate associations was 0.77. Given the potential issues related to statistical power, bias-corrected bootstrap confidence intervals were used to reliably estimate indirect effects, as recommended by other authors [101].
A main limitation, given its cross-sectional and correlational nature, is that causality cannot be inferred from the main findings of the current study. Nonetheless, association patterns between ASQ-3 scores and maternal styles are necessary for their understanding. In contrast to previous research that has analyzed parental playfulness assessed with the Parental Playfulness Scale [18,27,28,29,30], the current study did not consider the quality of parental interaction between fathers and their children. The study could have been more robust if we had complemented and compared fathers’ playfulness and the intrusiveness of adolescent mothers. However, most of the adolescent mothers were not cohabiting with the father of their children. As mentioned previously in the discussion section, a high number of Chilean adolescent fathers do not live with their child [89]. Additionally, the development of children born of adolescent mothers may be enhanced by the presence of grandparents when the father is absent [102], since Chilean adolescent mothers need support in childcare [13,15,16,103]. It has been shown that a large number of Chilean grandmothers share the responsibilities in the provision of care for children [104]. Though the participation of the grandparents could have revealed important information, some adolescent mothers receive poor or no social and psychosocial support from their families [105]. Actually, our sample was composed of some dyads that did not cohabit with fathers or grandparents. Despite this fact, including fathers and grandparents could be fruitful for future research of this nature.
Finally, the instruments used to measure dyadic interactions between mothers and children have not been previously applied to a Chilean sample. However, intrusiveness and playfulness have been studied in samples of dyads in low-income Latin American mothers and children [27,72], and in samples of Spanish-speaking mothers and children [106]. All these studies used the same instruments as the ones used here, suggesting that they are suitable for use with this Chilean sample, given the similarities in culture and ethnic group.
Given all the issues mentioned above, we stress the need for further research using probabilistic methods and larger samples as well as longitudinal designs to capture the causal nature of the mechanisms relating parental styles and children’s development and to replicate the effects found in the present study.

5. Conclusions

This study confirmed significant findings on the effect of maternal playfulness focused on creativity, imagination, humor and curiosity on the development of children of Chilean adolescent mothers. Although the effects found were low to medium sized, it is important to promote low-income adolescent mothers’ playfulness in their interactions. This promotes autonomy in their children and avoids maternal intrusiveness, since our results indicate that low-income mothers’ intrusiveness could act as a protective factor when mothers play with their children. However, it is important to emphasize the importance of improving maternal playfulness and considering that the sample studied is part of a group with greater social and economic vulnerability. This should receive significant attention in Chilean national intervention programs. Therefore, our findings highlight a growing understanding of maternal playfulness and mothers’ intrusion that could help in the effectiveness of intervention programs that contribute to reduce developmental problems in children born of Chilean adolescent mothers. In conclusion, these findings contribute to offering information about important characteristics of interaction between adolescent mothers and their children. Demonstrating active play and less intrusiveness offer opportunities for adolescent mothers to enhance both the interaction between them and their children and their children’s development.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.L.-M. and R.V.; methodology, L.L.-M. and D.L.; software, D.L.; formal analysis, L.L.-M. and D.L.; investigation, L.L.-M. and R.V.; data curation, L.L.-M. and D.L.; writing—original draft preparation, L.L.-M. and R.V.; writing—review and editing, L.L.-M. and R.V.; visualization, L.L.-M. and R.V.; supervision, L.L.-M. and R.V.; project administration, R.V.; funding acquisition, R.V. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo (ANID) through a doctoral fellowship granted to Laura Léniz-Maturana [grant number: 72190318]. And The APC was funded by University of Barcelona.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Ethics Committee of the Health Service of Concepción (protocol code 19-03-05, 30 May 2019) and the Health Service of Biobío (protocol code 82, 26 April 2019) for studies involving humans.

Informed Consent Statement

Written informed consent and assent have been obtained from the participants to publish this paper.

Data Availability Statement

Data are available upon request of the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank all families for their participation in this study and the workers at family health centers, day care learning centers, the residential home and the hospital for their support during the course of the project. Moreover, we appreciate the financial aid from the University of Barcelona for publishing in open Access.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Huang, C.Y.; Costeines, J.; Kaufman, J.S.; Ayala, C. Parenting Stress, Social Support, and Depression for Ethnic Minority Adolescent Mothers: Impact on Child Development. J. Child Fam. Stud. 2013, 23, 255–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Moore, K.A.; Morrison, D.R.; Greene, A.D. Effects on the Children Born to Adolescent Mothers. In Kids Having Kids; Routledge: London, UK, 2018; pp. 145–180. [Google Scholar]
  3. Tamis-Lemonda, C.S.; Shannon, J.; Spellmann, M. Low-income adolescent mothers’ knowledge about domains of child development. Infant Ment. Health J. 2002, 23, 88–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Salinas, V.; Jorquera-Samter, V. Gender differences in high-school dropout: Vulnerability and adolescent fertility in Chile. Adv. Life Course Res. 2021, 49, 100403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Hofferth, S.L.; Reid, L. Early childbearing and children’s achievement and behavior over time. Perspect Sex Reprod Health 2002, 34, 41–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Levine, J.A.; Pollack, H.; Comfort, M.E. Academic and behavioral outcomes among the children of young mothers. J. Marriage Fam. 2001, 63, 355–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Firk, C.; Konrad, K.; Herpertz-Dahlmann, B.; Scharke, W.; Dahmen, B. Cognitive development in children of adolescent mothers: The impact of socioeconomic risk and maternal sensitivity. Infant Behav. Dev. 2018, 50, 238–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. UNFPA. Consecuencias Socioeconómicas Del Embarazo En La Adolescencia En Seis Países de América Latina; Fondo de Población de las Naciones Unidas—Oficina Regional: Colombia, Ecuador, Guatemala, México y Paraguay, 2020; Available online: https://lac.unfpa.org/sites/default/files/pub-pdf/unfpa_consecuencias_en_6_paises_espanol_1.pdf (accessed on 3 January 2023).
  9. Instituto Nacional de Estadística. Boletín de Estadísticas Vitales; Departamento de Estadística Información de Salud, Instituto Nacional de Estadística: Santiago, Chile, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  10. Rodríguez Vignoli, J.; San Juan Bernuy, V. Maternidad, Fecundidad y Paridez en la Adolescencia y la Juventud: Continuidad y Cambio en América Latina; Naciones Unidas: New York, NY, USA; Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL): Santiago, Chile, 2020; p. 131. [Google Scholar]
  11. Encuesta Casen 2020 en Pandemia. Ministerio de Desarrollo Social y Familia. 2020. Available online: http://observatorio.ministeriodesarrollosocial.gob.cl/encuesta-casen-en-pandemia-2020 (accessed on 3 January 2023).
  12. Junaeb. Caracterización Socio-Educativa del Registro de Estudiantes en Condición de Paternidad, Maternidad y/o Embarazo 2019. Región del Biobío. 2019. Available online: https://www.junaeb.cl/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/Informe-Nacional-Registro-de-Estudiantes-padres-madres-y-embarazadas-2019.pdf (accessed on 3 January 2023).
  13. Luttges, C.; Leal, I.; Huepe, G.; González, D.; González, E.; Molina, T. Pregnant again? Perspectives of adolescent and young mothers who and do not experience a repeat pregnancy in adolescence. Int. J. Qual. Stud. Health Well-Being 2021, 16, 1898317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Alvarez, M.A.; Yáñez, P.R.; Aranis, L.R.; Yovane, C.; Rugama, A.O.; Páez, C.L.; Jacob, M.K. Autoconcepto y proyecto de vida: Percepciones de adolescentes embarazadas de un sector periférico de Santiago, participantes de un programa de educación para la salud. Rev. Psicol. 2005, 14, 141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Erfina, E.; Widyawati, W.; McKenna, L.; Reisenhofer, S.; Ismail, D. Adolescent mothers’ experiences of the transition to motherhood: An integrative review. Int. J. Nurs. Sci. 2019, 6, 221–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Mangeli, M.; Rayyani, M.; Cheraghi, M.A.; Tirgari, B. Exploring the challenges of adolescent mothers from their life experiences in the transition to motherhood: A qualitative study. J. Fam. Reprod. Health 2017, 11, 165–173. [Google Scholar]
  17. Farkas, C.; Álvarez, C.; Cuellar, M.D.P.; Avello, E.; Gómez, D.M.; Pereira, P. Mothers’ competence profiles and their relation to language and socioemotional development in Chilean children at 12 and 30 months. Infant Behav. Dev. 2020, 59, 101443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Crugnola, C.R.; Ierardi, E.; Gazzotti, S.; Albizzati, A. Motherhood in adolescent mothers: Maternal attachment, mother-infant styles of interaction and emotion regulation at three months. Infant Behav. Dev. 2014, 37, 44–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Mollborn, S.; Dennis, J.A. Investigating the Life Situations and Development of Teenage Mothers’ Children: Evidence from the ECLS-B. Popul. Res. Policy Rev. 2011, 31, 31–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Morinis, J.; Carson, C.; Quigley, M.A. Effect of teenage motherhood on cognitive outcomes in children: A population-based cohort study. Arch. Dis. Child. 2013, 98, 959–964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Reich, S. What do mothers know? Maternal knowledge of child development. Infant Ment. Health J. 2005, 26, 143–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Keown, L.J.; Woodward, L.J.; Field, J. Language development of pre-school children born to teenage mothers. Infant Child Dev. 2001, 10, 129–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ispa, J.M.; Fine, M.A.; Halgunseth, L.C.; Harper, S.; Robinson, J.; Boyce, L.; Brooks-Gunn, J.; Brady-Smith, C. Maternal Intrusiveness, Maternal Warmth, and Mother-Toddler Relationship Outcomes: Variations Across Low-Income Ethnic and Acculturation Groups. Child Dev. 2004, 75, 1613–1631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Liu, R.; Phillips, J.J.; Ji, F.; Shi, D.; Bell, M.A. Temperamental Shyness and Anger/Frustration in Childhood: Normative Development, Individual Differences, and the Impacts of Maternal Intrusiveness and Frontal Electroencephalogram Asymmetry. Child Dev. 2021, 92, 2529–2545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. McFadden, K.E.; Tamis-Lemonda, C.S. Maternal Responsiveness, Intrusiveness, and Negativity During Play with Infants: Contextual Associations and Infant Cognitive Status in A Low-Income Sample. Infant Ment. Health J. 2012, 34, 80–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Pungello, E.P.; Iruka, I.U.; Dotterer, A.M.; Mills-Koonce, R.; Reznick, J.S. The effects of socioeconomic status, race, and parenting on language development in early childhood. Dev. Psychol. 2009, 45, 544–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Cabrera, N.J.; Karberg, E.; Malin, J.L.; Aldoney, D. The magic of play: Low-income mothers’ and fathers’ playfulness and children’s emotion regulation and vocabulary skills. Infant Ment. Health J. 2017, 38, 757–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Creaghe, N.; Kidd, E. Symbolic play as a zone of proximal development: An analysis of informational exchange. Soc. Dev. 2022, 31, 1138–1156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Berlin, L.J.; Brady-Smith, C.; Brooks-Gunn, J. Links between childbearing age and observed maternal behaviors with 14-month-olds in the Early Head Start Research and Evaluation Project. Infant Ment. Health J. Off. Publ. WAIMH 2002, 23, 104–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Menashe-Grinberg, A.; Atzaba-Poria, N. Mother–child and father–child play interaction: The importance of parental playfulness as a moderator of the links between parental behavior and child negativity. Infant Ment. Health J. 2017, 38, 772–784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Atzaba-Poria, N.; Cabrera, N.J.; Menashe, A.; Karberg, E. The Parental Playfulness Scale; Ben-Gurion University of the Negev: Beersheba, Israel, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  32. Quinn, S.; Donnelly, S.; Kidd, E. The relationship between symbolic play and language acquisition: A meta-analytic review. Dev. Rev. 2018, 49, 121–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Quinn, S.; Kidd, E. Symbolic play promotes non-verbal communicative exchange in infant–caregiver dyads. Br. J. Dev. Psychol. 2019, 37, 33–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Thibodeau-Nielsen, R.B.; Gilpin, A.T.; Palermo, F.; Nancarrow, A.F.; Farrell, C.B.; Turley, D.; DeCaro, J.A.; Lochman, J.E.; Boxmeyer, C.L. Pretend play as a protective factor for developing executive functions among children living in poverty. Cogn. Dev. 2020, 56, 100964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Jung, J. Caregivers’ playfulness and infants’ emotional stress during transitional time. Early Child Dev. Care 2011, 181, 1397–1407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Lillard, A.S.; Lerner, M.D.; Hopkins, E.J.; Dore, R.A.; Smith, E.D.; Palmquist, C.M. The impact of pretend play on children’s development: A review of the evidence. Psychol. Bull. 2013, 139, 1–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Orr, E.; Geva, R. Symbolic play and language development. Infant Behav. Dev. 2015, 38, 147–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Trevlas, E.; Matsouka, O.; Zachopoulou, E. Relationship between playfulness and motor creativity in preschool children. Early Child Dev. Care 2003, 173, 535–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Chiarello, L.A.; Bartlett, D.J.; Palisano, R.J.; McCoy, S.W.; Jeffries, L.; Fiss, A.L.; Wilk, P. Determinants of playfulness of young children with cerebral palsy. Dev. Neurorehabilit. 2018, 22, 240–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Chiarello, L.A.; Huntington, A.; Huntington, A. A comparison of motor behaviors, interaction, and playfulness during mother-child and father-child play with children with motor delay. Phys. Occup. Ther. Pediatr. 2006, 26, 129–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Ríos-Rincón, A.M.; Adams, K.; Magill-Evans, J.; Cook, A. Playfulness in children with limited motor abilities when using a robot. Phys. Occup. Ther. Pediatr. 2016, 36, 232–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Kim, J.E.; Shin, N. Effects of Playfulness, Play Support Beliefs and Parenting Stress on Intimate Parenting in Mothers of Young Children. Korean J. Hum. Ecol. 2014, 23, 571–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Johnstone, H.; Yang, Y.; Xue, H.; Rozelle, S. Infant Cognitive Development and Stimulating Parenting Practices in Rural China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 5277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Han, J.H.; Lee, J.S. The Effects of a Mother’s Big Five Personality Factors and Playfulness on Maternal Parenting Behavior. Korean J. Child Stud. 2015, 36, 173–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Hubbs-Tait, L.; Culp, A.M.; Culp, R.E.; Miller, C.E. Relation of maternal cognitive stimulation, emotional support, and intrusive behavior during Head Start to children’s kindergarten cognitive abilities. Child Dev. 2002, 73, 110–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Hubbs-Tait, L.; Culp, A.M.; Huey, E.; Culp, R.; Starost, H.-J.; Hare, C. Relation of Head Start attendance to children’s cognitive and social outcomes: Moderation by family risk. Early Child. Res. Q. 2002, 17, 539–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Lam, C.B.; Chung, K.K.H. Maternal warmth moderates the longitudinal associations of family economic pressure with early reading and writing skills among Chinese children. Learn. Individ. Differ. 2023, 101, 102246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Maas, A.J.B.; Vreeswijk, C.M.; van Bakel, H.J. Effect of situation on mother–infant interaction. Infant Behav. Dev. 2013, 36, 42–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Broomell, A.P.; Smith, C.L.; Calkins, S.D.; Bell, M.A. Context of maternal intrusiveness during infancy and associations with preschool executive function. Infant Child Dev. 2019, 29, e2162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Ainsworth, M.; Blehar, M.C.; Waters, E.; Wall, S. Patterns of Attachment; Lawrence Erlbaum: Hillsdale, NJ, USA, 1978. [Google Scholar]
  51. Tamis-LeMonda, C.S.; Shannon, J.D.; Cabrera, N.; Lamb, M.E. Fathers and mothers at play with their 2- and 3-year-olds: Contributions to language and cognitive development. Child Dev. 2002, 75, 1806–1820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Caughy, M.O.; Peredo, T.N.; Owen, M.T.; Mills, B. Gender differences in the relation between mothering behaviors and child-behavior problems among Hispanic preschoolers. Dev. Psychol. 2016, 52, 592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Peter Hobson, R.; Patrick, M.P.; Crandell, L.E.; Garcia Perez, R.M.; Lee, A. Maternal sensitivity and infant triadic communication. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 2004, 45, 470–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Conway, L.J.; Levickis, P.; Smith, J.; Mensah, F.; Wake, M.; Reilly, S. Maternal communicative behaviours and interaction quality as predictors of language development: Findings from a community-based study of slow-to-talk toddlers. Int. J. Lang. Commun. Disord. 2017, 53, 339–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Feldman, R.; Dollberg, D.; Nadam, R. The expression and regulation of anger in toddlers: Relations to maternal behavior and mental representations. Infant Behav. Dev. 2011, 34, 310–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Swingler, M.M.; Perry, N.B.; Calkins, S.D.; Bell, M.A. Maternal behavior predicts infant neurophysiological and behavioral attention processes in the first year. Dev. Psychol. 2017, 53, 13–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Calkins, S.D.; Hungerford, A.; Dedmon, S.E. Mothers’ interactions with temperamentally frustrated infants. Infant Ment. Health J. Off. Publ. WAIMH 2004, 25, 219–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Rocha, H.A.; Correia, L.L.; Leite, Á.J.; Rocha, S.G.; Albuquerque, L.D.S.; Machado, M.M.; Campos, J.S.; Silva, A.C.E.; Sudfeld, C.R. Positive Parenting Behaviors and Child Development in Ceará, Brazil: A Population-Based Study. Children 2022, 9, 1246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Szabó, N.; Deković, M.; van Aken, C.; Verhoeven, M.; van Aken, M.A.; Junger, M. The relations among child negative interactive behavior, child temperament, and maternal behavior. Early Child. Res. Q. 2008, 23, 366–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Joussemet, M.; Koestner, R.; Lekes, N.; Landry, R. A longitudinal study of the relationship of maternal autonomy support to children’s adjustment and achievement in school. J. Pers. 2005, 73, 1215–1236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Graziano, P.A.; Calkins, S.D.; Keane, S.P. Sustained attention development during the toddlerhood to preschool period: Associations with toddlers’ emotion regulation strategies and maternal behaviour. Infant Child Dev. 2011, 20, 389–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Fay-Stammbach, T.; Hawes, D.J.; Meredith, P. Parenting Influences on Executive Function in Early Childhood: A Review. Child Dev. Perspect. 2014, 8, 258–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Driscoll, J.R.; Easterbrooks, M.A. Young mothers’ play with their toddlers: Individual variability as a function of psychosocial factors. Infant Child Dev. Int. J. Res. Pract. 2007, 16, 649–670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Clincy, A.R.; Mills-Koonce, W.R. Trajectories of intrusive parenting during infancy and toddlerhood as predictors of rural, low-income African American boys’ school-related outcomes. Am. J. Orthopsychiatry 2013, 83, 194–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Kumar, M.; Huang, K.Y. Impact of being an adolescent mother on subsequent maternal health, parenting, and child development in Kenyan low-income and high adversity informal settlement context. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0248836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Donald, K.A.; Wedderburn, C.J.; Barnett, W.; Nhapi, R.T.; Rehman, A.M.; Stadler, J.A.; Hoffman, N.; Koen, N.; Zar, H.J.; Stein, D.J. Risk and protective factors for child development: An observational South African birth cohort. PLoS Med. 2019, 16, e1002920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Fuligni, A.S.; Brooks-Gunn, J. Mother–Child Interactions in Early Head Start: Age and Ethnic Differences in Low-Income Dyads. Parenting 2013, 13, 1–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Brady-Smith, C.; O’Brien, C.; Berlin, L.; Ware, A.; Brooks-Gunn, J. Early Head Start Research and Evaluation Project. In Child-Parent Interaction Rating Scales for the Three-Bag Assessment; Columbia University: New York, NY, USA, 1999; pp. 7–8. [Google Scholar]
  69. Squires, J.; Bricker, D.D.; Twombly, E. Ages & Stages Questionnaires; Paul, H., Ed.; Brookes: Baltimore, MD, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  70. Small, J.W.; Hix-Small, H.; Vargas-Baron, E.; Marks, K.P. Comparative use of the Ages and Stages Questionnaires in low-and middle-income countries. Dev. Med. Child Neurol. 2019, 61, 431–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Armijo, I.; Schonhaut, L.; Cordero, M. Validation of the Chilean version of the Ages and Stages Questionnaire (ASQ-CL) in Community Health Settings. Early Hum. Dev. 2015, 91, 671–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Korfmacher, J.; Chawla, N. Toolkit of Recommended Curricula and Assessments for Early Childhood Home Visiting; UNICEF: Geneva, Switzerland, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  73. Hayes, A.F. Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach; Guilford Publications: New York, NY, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  74. Asociación Investigadores de Mercado (Association of Market Researchers). AIM Clasificación Grupos Socioeconómicos y Manual de Aplicación, 2019. Santiago, Chile. Available online: https://aimchile.cl/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/Actualizacio%CC%81n-y-Manual-GSE-AIM-2019-1.pdf (accessed on 3 January 2023).
  75. Hammer, A.T.; Grau, J.M.; Silberman, S.G.; Smith, E.N. Dyadic synchrony among young Latina mothers and their toddlers: The role of maternal and child behavior. Infant Behav. Dev. 2019, 57, 101378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Williams, L.R. The impact of infant carrying on adolescent mother–infant interactions during the still-face task. Infant Child Dev. 2020, 29, e2169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Zeiders, K.H.; Umana-Taylor, A.; Jahromi, L.B.; Updegraff, K.A.; White, R. Discrimination and Acculturation Stress: A Longitudinal Study of Children’s Well-Being from Prenatal Development to 5 Years of Age. J. Dev. Behav. Pediatr. 2016, 37, 557–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Taylor, Z.E.; Spinrad, T.L.; VanSchyndel, S.K.; Eisenberg, N.; Huynh, J.; Sulik, M.J.; Granger, D.A. Sociodemographic risk, parenting, and effortful control: Relations to salivary alpha-amylase and cortisol in early childhood. Dev. Psychobiol. 2013, 55, 869–880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Wilson, K.L.; Glebova, T.; Davis, S.; Seshadri, G. Adolescent Mothers in Foster Care: Relational Ethics, Depressive Symptoms and Health Problems Through a Contextual Therapy Lens. Contemp. Fam. Ther. 2017, 39, 150–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Khoury, J.E.; Dimitrov, L.; Enlow, M.B.; Haltigan, J.D.; Bronfman, E.; Lyons-Ruth, K. Patterns of Maternal Childhood Maltreatment and Disrupted Interaction Between Mothers and Their 4-Month-Old Infants. Child Maltreatment 2021, 27, 366–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Yogman, M.; Garner, A.; Hutchinson, J. The Power of Play: A Pediatric Role in Enhancing Development in Young Children. Young Child. 2018, 142, e20182058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Russell, C.; Amod, Z.; Rosenthal, L. The effects of parent-child Mediated Learning Experience (MLE) interaction on young children’s cognitive development. Perspect. Educ. 2008, 26, 28–41. [Google Scholar]
  83. Thibodeau-Nielsen, R.B.; Gilpin, A.T.; Nancarrow, A.F.; Pierucci, J.M.; Brown, M.M. Fantastical pretense’s effects on executive function in a diverse sample of preschoolers. J. Appl. Dev. Psychol. 2020, 68, 101–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Bauer, R.H.; Gilpin, A.T.; Thibodeau-Nielsen, R.B. Executive functions and imaginative play: Exploring relations with prosocial behaviors using structural equation modeling. Trends Neurosci. Educ. 2021, 25, 100165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Ahmad, S.; Hussain, C.h.A.; Batool, A.; Sittar, K.; Malik, M. Play and Cognitive Development: Formal Operational Perspective of Piaget’s Theory. J. Educ. Pract. 2016, 7, 72–79. [Google Scholar]
  86. Clark, C.A.; Woodward, L.J. Relation of perinatal risk and early parenting to executive control at the transition to school. Dev. Sci. 2015, 18, 525–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Gaertner, B.M.; Spinrad, T.L.; Eisenberg, N. Focused attention in toddlers: Measurement, stability, and relations to negative emotion and parenting. Infant Child Dev. Int. J. Res. Pract. 2008, 17, 339–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Weisberg, D.S. Pretend play. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Cogn. Sci. 2015, 6, 249–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Kızıldere, E.; Aktan-Erciyes, A.; Tahiroğlu, D.; Göksun, T. A multidimensional investigation of pretend play and language competence: Concurrent and longitudinal relations in preschoolers. Cogn. Dev. 2020, 54, 100870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Laake, L.M.; Bridgett, D.J. Early language development in context: Interactions between infant temperament and parenting characteristics. Early Educ. Dev. 2018, 29, 730–746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Molina-Gutiérrez, R. El padre adolescente, su relación parental y de pareja. Última Década 2011, 19, 89–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  92. de Vries, J.P. Conceptualizing physical playfulness. Int. J. Play 2021, 10, 243–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Li, X.; Eiden, R.D.; Epstein, L.H.; Shenassa, E.D.; Xie, C.; Wen, X. Parenting and cognitive and psychomotor delay due to small-for-gestational-age birth. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 2016, 58, 169–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Choi, M.S.; Kim, J.H. The effect of playfulness on the social skills of young children: A study of gender differences. Korean J. Child Stud. 2006, 27, 103–116. [Google Scholar]
  95. Bodrova, E.; Leong, D.J. The importance of being playful. Educ. Leadersh. 2003, 60, 50–53. [Google Scholar]
  96. Canning, N. Children’s empowerment in play. Eur. Early Child. Educ. Res. 2007, 15, 227–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Degnan, K.A.; Calkins, S.D.; Keane, S.P.; Hill-Soderlund, A.L. Profiles of Disruptive Behavior Across Early Childhood: Contributions of Frustration Reactivity, Physiological Regulation, and Maternal Behavior. Child Dev. 2008, 79, 1357–1376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  98. Rubin, K.H.; Burgess, K.B.; Hastings, P.D. Stability and Social-Behavioral Consequences of Toddlers’ Inhibited Temperament and Parenting Behaviors. Child Dev. 2002, 73, 483–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Agnafors, S.; Bladh, M.; Svedin, C.G.; Sydsjö, G. Mental health in young mothers, single mothers and their children. BMC Psychiatry 2019, 19, 112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  100. Rhule, D.M.; McMahon, R.J.; Spieker, S.J.; Munson, J.A. Positive Adjustment and Associated Protective Factors in Children of Adolescent Mothers. J. Child Fam. Stud. 2006, 15, 224–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Hoffman, L.; Marquis, J.; Poston, D.; Summers, J.A.; Turnbull, A. Assessing Family Outcomes: Psychometric Evaluation of the Beach Center Family Quality of Life Scale. J. Marriage Fam. 2006, 68, 1069–1083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Hayes, A.F.; Scharkow, M. The relative trustworthiness of inferential tests of the indirect effect in statistical mediation analysis: Does method really matter? Psychol. Sci. 2013, 24, 1918–1927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Parkes, A.; Chambers, S.; Buston, K. Nonresident Fathers’ and Grandparents’ Early Years Support and Middle Childhood Socio-Emotional Adjustment. J. Marriage Fam. 2021, 83, 358–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Zegers, M.; Reynolds, S.A. Mothers’ and grandmothers’ caregiving for young children in Chile: Roles and responsibilities. J. Fam. Psychol. 2022, 36, 1285–1295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Bonilla-Sepúlveda, Ó. Depresión y factores asociados en mujeres adolescentes embarazadas y no embarazadas en Medellín (Colombia) 2009: Estudio de corte transversal. Rev. Colomb. Obstet. Ginecol. 2010, 61, 207–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  106. Cerro, J.; Vilaseca, R. Parenting, Mother’s and Father’s playfulness and intrusiveness: A study with Spanish families with children with disabilities. In Proceedings of the 17th Congress of World Association for Infant Mental Health (WAIMTH), Rome, Italy, 22–26 June 2018. [Google Scholar]
Children 10 00609 g001 550
Figure 1. Participant flowchart.
Figure 1. Participant flowchart.
Children 10 00609 g001
Children 10 00609 g002 550
Figure 2. Effect of maternal playfulness on children’s communication development mediated by mothers’ intrusiveness. Asterisks (***) indicate the significance effect of maternal playfulness on mother’s intrusiveness (p < 0.001) (a1).
Figure 2. Effect of maternal playfulness on children’s communication development mediated by mothers’ intrusiveness. Asterisks (***) indicate the significance effect of maternal playfulness on mother’s intrusiveness (p < 0.001) (a1).
Children 10 00609 g002
Children 10 00609 g003 550
Figure 3. Effect of maternal playfulness on children’s gross motor development mediated by mothers’ intrusiveness. Asterisks (***) indicate the significance effect of maternal playfulness on mother’s intrusiveness (p < 0.001) (a1).
Figure 3. Effect of maternal playfulness on children’s gross motor development mediated by mothers’ intrusiveness. Asterisks (***) indicate the significance effect of maternal playfulness on mother’s intrusiveness (p < 0.001) (a1).
Children 10 00609 g003
Children 10 00609 g004 550
Figure 4. Effect of maternal playfulness on children’s fine motor development mediated by mother’s intrusiveness. Asterisks (***) indicate the significance effect of maternal playfulness on mother’s intrusiveness (p < 0.001) (a1).
Figure 4. Effect of maternal playfulness on children’s fine motor development mediated by mother’s intrusiveness. Asterisks (***) indicate the significance effect of maternal playfulness on mother’s intrusiveness (p < 0.001) (a1).
Children 10 00609 g004
Children 10 00609 g005 550
Figure 5. Effect of maternal playfulness on children’s solving-problem development mediated by mother’s intrusiveness. Asterisks (***) indicate the significance effect of maternal playfulness on mother’s intrusiveness (p < 0.001) (a1), and asterisk (*) indicates the significance effect of mother’s intrusiveness on children’s problem solving (p < 0.05) (b1).
Figure 5. Effect of maternal playfulness on children’s solving-problem development mediated by mother’s intrusiveness. Asterisks (***) indicate the significance effect of maternal playfulness on mother’s intrusiveness (p < 0.001) (a1), and asterisk (*) indicates the significance effect of mother’s intrusiveness on children’s problem solving (p < 0.05) (b1).
Children 10 00609 g005
Children 10 00609 g006 550
Figure 6. Effect of maternal playfulness on children’s personal–social development mediated by mother’s intrusiveness. Asterisks (***) indicate the significance effect of maternal playfulness on mother’s intrusiveness (p < 0.001) (a1). And asterisks (**) indicate the direct significance effect of maternal playfulness on children’s personal-social development (p < 0.01) (c′).
Figure 6. Effect of maternal playfulness on children’s personal–social development mediated by mother’s intrusiveness. Asterisks (***) indicate the significance effect of maternal playfulness on mother’s intrusiveness (p < 0.001) (a1). And asterisks (**) indicate the direct significance effect of maternal playfulness on children’s personal-social development (p < 0.01) (c′).
Children 10 00609 g006
Table
Table 1. Descriptive data on children’s development ASQ-3 scores.
Table 1. Descriptive data on children’s development ASQ-3 scores.
Min.Max.MSD
Communication children’s development (0–60)06029.4911.59
Gross motor children’s development (0–60)56039.2416.27
Fine motor children’s development (0–60)106037.4112.24
Problem-solving children’s development (0–60)06037.4112.22
Personal–social children’s development (0–60)206041.4610.23
Note: Raw values of the children’s development.
Table
Table 2. Kendall’s correlations (Τ) between maternal playfulness, intrusiveness scores, and children’s ASQ-3 scores. Bootstrap BCa 95% CIs are shown within brackets.
Table 2. Kendall’s correlations (Τ) between maternal playfulness, intrusiveness scores, and children’s ASQ-3 scores. Bootstrap BCa 95% CIs are shown within brackets.
1234567
1 Parental Playfulness Scale −0.400 **0.253 **0.1460.170 *0.173 *0.237 **
2 Subscale of Intrusiveness −0.248 **−0.108−0.227 **−0.266 **−0.088
3 Communication ASQ-3 area 0.244 **0.257 **0.231 **0.247 **
4 Gross motor ASQ-3 area 0.280 **0.273 **0.214 **
5 Fine motor ASQ-3 area 0.445 **0.224 **
6 Problem-solving ASQ-3 area 0.240 **
7 Personal–social ASQ-3 area
* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01.
Table
Table 3. Model coefficient effect of maternal playfulness on each ASQ-3 area of children’s development.
Table 3. Model coefficient effect of maternal playfulness on each ASQ-3 area of children’s development.
Mothers’ IntrusivenessCommunicationGross MotorFine MotorProblem-SolvingPersonal–Social
Model 1Model 2Model 3Model 4Model 5
Coeff.SEpCoeff.SEpCoeff.SEpCoeff.SEpCoeff.SEpCoeff.SEp
Maternal playfulness−0.330.07<0.0010.140.080.080.110.080.190.070.080.370.070.080.360.240.080.004
Mothers’ intrusiveness---−0.210.110.07−0.060.120.60−0.220.120.06−0.270.110.020.070.110.55
Intercept3.390.22<0.0010.120.440.78−0.160.470.730.340.450.460.450.450.31−0.840.450.07
R2 = 0.22R2 = 0.14R2 = 0.04R2 = 0.09R2 = 0.13R2 = 0.11
F (1, 77) = 21.94,
p < 0.001		F (2, 76) = 6.24,
p = 0.003		F (2, 76) = 1.72,
p = 0.185		F (2, 76) = 3.95,
p = 0.023		F (2, 76) = 5.44,
p = 0.006		F (2, 76) = 4.72,
p = 0.011
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Léniz-Maturana, L.; Vilaseca, R.; Leiva, D. Non-Intrusive Maternal Style as a Mediator between Playfulness and Children’s Development for Low-Income Chilean Adolescent Mothers. Children 2023, 10, 609. https://doi.org/10.3390/children10040609

AMA Style

Léniz-Maturana L, Vilaseca R, Leiva D. Non-Intrusive Maternal Style as a Mediator between Playfulness and Children’s Development for Low-Income Chilean Adolescent Mothers. Children. 2023; 10(4):609. https://doi.org/10.3390/children10040609

Chicago/Turabian Style

Léniz-Maturana, Laura, Rosa Vilaseca, and David Leiva. 2023. "Non-Intrusive Maternal Style as a Mediator between Playfulness and Children’s Development for Low-Income Chilean Adolescent Mothers" Children 10, no. 4: 609. https://doi.org/10.3390/children10040609

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop