Next Article in Journal
Extracellular Vesicles as Potential Biomarkers for Early Detection and Diagnosis of Pancreatic Cancer
Next Article in Special Issue
Controlling Antibiotic Release from Polymethylmethacrylate Bone Cement
Previous Article in Journal
Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Cardiomyocytes, in Contrast to Adipose Tissue-Derived Stromal Cells, Efficiently Improve Heart Function in Murine Model of Myocardial Infarction
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Biomedicines
Volume 8
Issue 12
10.3390/biomedicines8120580
biomedicines-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Lectin Protein as a Promising Component to Functionalize Micelles, Liposomes and Lipid NPs against Coronavirus

by
Mehran Alavi
1,*,
Kofi Asare-Addo
2 and
Ali Nokhodchi
3,*
1
Nanobiotechnology Laboratory, Faculty of Science, Razi University, Kermanshah 67146, Iran
2
Department of Pharmacy, University of Huddersfield, Queensgate, Huddersfield HD1 3DH, UK
3
Pharmaceuics Research Laboratory, Arundel Building, School of Life Sciences, University of Sussex, Brighton BN1 9QJ, UK
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biomedicines 2020, 8(12), 580; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines8120580
Submission received: 24 October 2020 / Revised: 26 November 2020 / Accepted: 3 December 2020 / Published: 7 December 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Theranostic Drug Delivery: Prospects and Problems)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The outbreak of a novel strain coronavirus as the causative agent of COVID-19 pneumonia, first identified in Wuhan, China in December 2019, has resulted in considerable focus on virulence abilities of coronavirus. Lectins are natural proteins with the ability to bind specific carbohydrates related to various microorganisms, including viruses, bacteria, fungi and parasites. Lectins have the ability to agglutinate and neutralize these pathogeneses. The delivery of the encapsulated antiviral agents or vaccines across the cell membrane can be possible by functionalized micellar and liposomal formulations. In this mini-review, recent advances and challenges related to important lectins with inhibition activities against coronaviruses are presented to obtain a novel viewpoint of microformulations or nanoformulations by micellar and liposomal cell-binding carriers.

1. Introduction

Coronaviruses, a large family of RNA viruses (a positive sense, single-stranded RNA in the range size of 27–32 kb), belong to the subfamily Orthocoronavirinae in the family of Coronaviridae in the order Nidovirales [1]. The genome of the coronavirus is composed of open reading frames (ORFs), the first of which comprises two-thirds of the genome and encodes the replicase proteins. The last third contains the structural protein genes in a fixed order [2]. These viruses may cause diseases in birds and mammals, such as the infectious bronchitis virus (IBV) and feline coronavirus (FCoV), respectively [3,4,5]. The 1930s brought about the discovery of the first member of the family of the coronavirus [6]. The severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) outbreak in 2002–2003 shook the world and brought this to the forefront of research, and thus the discovery of more of the members of this family of viruses after the epidemic [2]. As illustrated in Figure 1, a complete viral particle is composed of several proteins including nucleocapsid (RNA + nucleoprotein), spike, envelope and the membrane proteins [7]. It is important to note that some viruses may contain hemagglutinin esterase (Figure 1). The membrane and envelope proteins are involved in virus assembly, whereas the spike protein is the leading mediator of viral entry and the principal player in determining host range [2]. The 3C-like protease and the papain-like protease (PLP) are the main viral proteases related to coronaviruses [5]. In humans, severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS), and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) can lead to health-threatening diseases. The novel virus, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has led to COVID-19. The outbreak of this novel strain of coronavirus as the causative agent of COVID-19 pneumonia, first identified in Wuhan, China in December 2019, has resulted in considerable focus being placed on coronavirus virulence properties [8]. The most severe form of this novel virus has been reported to lead to hypoxia and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), which can lead to the requirement of invasive mechanical ventilation [9]. Many countries in the Middle East, Europe and the United States have been affected by this infection. Based on recent reports, COVID-19 can be classified as a mild, moderate and severe disease. The fatality rate of 2% up to 2.5% and the acute disease are as a result of severe alveolar damage and respiratory failure [8,10].
A viral infection is dependent on the interaction of viral particles with specific receptors on the cell membrane. The fusion of the virus envelope with the cell membrane is mediated by the spike glycoproteins [2]. Furin is one of the proteases with high expression in lung cells which can be responsible for the proteolytic cleavage of the envelope proteins of viruses such as SARS-CoV and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). In SARS-CoV-2, the furin-like cleavage site in the spike glycoprotein may contribute to the pathogenicity and the viral life cycle [11].
This review seeks to address the recent advances and challenges related to important lectins with inhibition activities against coronaviruses. This is carried out to aid the reader to obtain a novel viewpoint of microformulations or nanoformulations by micellar and liposomal cell-binding carriers.

2. Antiviral Therapies

Several anti-infective agents, such as chlorine-containing disinfectant, 62–71% ethanol (ethyl alcohol), 0.5% hydrogen peroxide or 0.1% sodium hypochlorite (bleach) and exposure to 56 °C for 20 min or 65 °C for 10 min in serum medium, may be used to deactivate or remove virus [12]. According to patients’ conditions, synthetic antiviral drugs, including α-interferon oral spray, interferon-β, lopinavir/ritonavir, favipiravir, remdesivir, ribavirin, corticosteroids, chloroquine phosphate, and arbidol, may be prescribed for acute cases of COVID-19 [13,14,15,16,17,18,19]. Current antiviral agents can target entry, fusion, viral RNA, and proteases of coronaviruses. α-interferon has been reported to inhibit SARS-CoV reproduction in vitro [20]. Lopinavir/ritonavir has been reported to have anti-SARS-CoV activity in vitro as well as in clinical studies [21]. Chloroquine has also been reported to have the ability to block SARS-CoV-2 infection at low micromolar concentrations [15]. Hydroxychloroquine has been used to prevent and treat COVID-19 via blocking the interactions between the virus and the angiotensin-converting enzyme-2 receptor, as well as the sialic acids receptor. Its use has been found to be effective in vitro [22,23] and in preliminary clinical results [24,25]. The main hurdle is that the concentration of hydroxychloroquine in the lung is not good enough to kill coronavirus when administered via the oral route. Therefore, an inhalation formulation which directly delivers the drug to the respiratory tract whilst minimizing the systemic exposure would be a desirable alternative [26]. Tai et al. showed that the liposomal formulation of hydroxychloroquine can be more effective via the inhalation route compared to the injection or oral route in tackling COVID-19. The authors showed that the liposomal formulation produced high concentrations of hydroxychloroquine in the lung (~30-fold) with a longer half-life (~2.5-fold) when the novel liposomal formulations were administered by intratracheal instillation in Sprague–Dawley (SD) rats as compared to the intravenous formulation [27]. It was concluded that the inhalable liposomal formulation containing hydroxychloroquine may provide clinical benefits and serve as a potential treatment for COVID-19. In another study carried out by Feliciello and Procino [28], the authors showed that the pulmonary proteoliposome as a new therapeutic approach could be effective in reducing the overall viral load in the lung, thereby helping the immune system to reduce the lung infection. There are, however, various dose-dependent side effects such as cardio-metabolic, hypercholesterolemia, hypertriglyceridemia, and adverse gastrointestinal (GI) effects for this type of antiviral therapy [29,30]. Some of the most common GI effects reported for lopinavir/ ritonavir includes diarrhoea and nausea [31]. The efficiency of vitamins A, E, D3, C and B in the prevention and reduction of coronaviruses-associated diseases is reported by several studies [32,33]. Vitamin A and retinoids have been reported to inhibit measles replication by upregulating elements of the innate immune response in uninfected bystander cells. During subsequent rounds of viral replication, this, therefore, makes them refractory to productive infection making it promising for the treatment of SARS-CoV and the prevention of lung infection [34]. It has been reported that vitamin B2 and UV light in combination was effective in reducing the titer of MERS-CoV in human plasma products [33]. Vitamin B3 has been reported to be efficacious in both prophylactic and therapeutic settings [35] and also inhibited neutrophil infiltration into the lungs, whilst demonstrating anti-inflammatory effects from lung injuries induced by ventilators [36]. In addition, the application of natural compounds extracted from herbal metabolites can reduce these side effects owing to biocompatibility and biodegradability of these materials. Herbal materials such as betulinic acid, lignin [37], coumaroyltyramine, quercetin, and N-cis-feruloyltyramine [38] have shown antiviral activities against MERS and SARS. 3C-like protease and papain-like protease were targeted for these herbal compounds [39]. There are several ways for inhibiting the coronavirus entry into target cells. Binding inhibitors to angiotensin-converting enzyme-2 (ACE2) receptors is the first way [40]. For instance, a recent study showed that human recombinant soluble ACE2 (hrsACE2) can hinder the early stages of SARS-CoV-2 infections significantly [41]. These receptors are single-pass type I membrane proteins with a higher expression on the surface of epithelial cells of the pulmonary alveolus, vascular endothelial cells of the heart and the kidneys, and small intestine enterocytes. The S1 domain of the spike protein of SARS-CoV can bind these metallopeptide receptors [42]. In this regard, patients with hypertension, cardiac diseases and diabetes may experience severe COVID-19 infection owing to the use of ACE2-enhancing drugs [43]. The second type of inhibitors bind to the coronavirus and block its interaction with related receptors on the cells. Prevention of conformational changes and fusion of viruses with the cells represents the third class of inhibitors [40].

3. Lectins

Antitumor, antiviral and antimicrobial activities of lectins have been reported by various studies [44,45,46]. Before the initiation of an antibody’s activity in the body, the mannose-binding lectin (MBL) as a humoral protein can block the entry of coronavirus into the target cells [42,47,48]. Moreover, MBL increases viral neutralization by the activation of the complement system and the influx of innate immune cells [49]. The innate immune system employs this mechanism to hinder viral and bacterial infections in alveolar cells. Surface-active phospholipoprotein complexes containing phospholipids (80%), cholesterol (10%) and proteins (10%) with the names of SP-D, SP-C, SP-B, and SP-A are secreted by type II alveolar cells. SP-A and SP-D collectins having C-type lectins can opsonize bacterial and viral pathogens and facilitate the phagocytosis action by monocytes and macrophages. Interaction of collectins with carbohydrate moieties of spike protein on the surface of the SARS-CoV can lead to inactivate viral uptake and reducing pulmonary inflammation, wherein a mild and moderate illness in smokers may be resulted from increased levels of SP-A protein levels in sputum, plasma and the serum [50].
Natural carbohydrate-binding proteins such as lectins have demonstrated antiviral properties in the case of HIV and coronaviruses [51,52]. In this case, the spike glycoprotein related to SARS coronavirus and the envelope glycoprotein GP120 of HIV is the main targets for a red algae-derived lectin (griffithsin) [52,53]. In addition, griffithsin has antiviral activities against the hepatitis C virus [54]. Plants express twelve different families of lectins with binding ability to mono- or oligo-saccharides related to glycolipids or glycoproteins [55,56]. As illustrated in Figure 2, two functional subunits including S1 and S2 subunits are recognized for spike protein, which facilitates binding to the receptors of the host cell and fusion of viruses with the cellular membrane. The spike protein with a trimer structure is decorated with N-linked glycans that are critical components for appropriate folding and neutralizing by specific antibodies and host proteases [57]. The high-mannose oligosaccharides related to spike and membrane glycoproteins can be targeted by herbal lectins, wherein two coronaviruses, namely, feline infectious peritonitis virus and mouse hepatitis virus, were blocked by Galanthus nivalis agglutinin (GNA), Urtica dioica agglutinin (UDA), and Hippeastrum hybrid agglutinin (HHA) via the inhibition of virus entry at a post-binding stage [58].
According to structure type, there are four lectins, namely, super lectins (with dissimilar carbohydrate-binding domains), chimero lectins (hybrid proteins composed of one or more carbohydrate-binding sites), hololectins (at least two carbohydrate-binding domains) and merolectins (single carbohydrate-binding site). Almost all agglutinating lectins are located in the hololectins group [59]. A reduction in the intracellular loading of RNA associated with SARS-CoV was observed for the MBL of the amaryllis plant species after 8 h of infection [40]. Red, brown, and particularly green alga (nearly 500 types of lectin) are the main sources of algal lectins. Self-assembly of viruses may be disrupted by the effects of MBL [60]. More antiviral activities of MBL (extracted from red algae Grateloupia chiangii) toward the herpes simplex virus was observed compared to the influenza virus. In this case, MBL had a significant ability to bind maltoheptaose-β-Sp1 and maltohexaose-β-Sp1 [44].

4. Micelles and Liposomes

Nanotechnology has presented new insights in various medicinal fields particularly in the case of infectious diseases therapy [61,62,63,64]. Nanomaterials (NMs) are in the size range of 1–100 nm, and their unique physicochemical properties are a vital element of this technology. Large surface areas and higher reactivates are expected for NM compared to bulk one [65,66,67,68]. Nanoparticles (NPs), nanowires (NWs) and nanoplates (NPLs) are zero, one, and two-dimensional examples of NMs [69,70,71]. Self-aggregation of surfactants in the liquid colloidal medium under specific conditions of surfactant concentrations (more than critical micelle concentration) and temperature of the system (higher than Krafft temperature) results in micelles formation. As presented in Figure 3, lipid micelles have a single layer of lipid monolayers with fatty acid and aqueous cores for the respective oil in water (O/W) and water in oil (W/O) types [72,73]. Based on the physicochemical properties of an antiviral or an immune-stimulant agent, either the surfactant layer or the core part may be used to load them [74].
Liposomes in the nanoscale, as one type of NP, are prepared by the formation of a phospholipid bilayer vesicle in an aqueous medium (Figure 3). Single bilayer and multilayer liposomes are the two main types of liposome [75,76]. Both the bilayer and the aqueous core of this carrier may be used in the encapsulation of antiviral drugs [77,78]. In addition, loading via absorption or anchoring on the liposome surface can be applied for some therapeutic agents or antibodies [79]. In contrast to passive liposomes, active liposomes have been prepared by the targeted functionalization of the surface of liposomes for specific targets [80,81]. For example, a common modification of a liposome surface is through the use or application of polyethylene glycol (PEG) to increase water solubility and thus decrease the renal clearance of the liposome and immunological responses in physiological conditions (Figure 3) [82]. Delivery of the encapsulated antiviral agents across the cell membrane can be possible and achieved by liposomal formulations. In addition to drug entrapment efficiency, size variation and stability of the formulation, biocompatibility and biodegradability in physiological conditions, particularly in pulmonary tissues, are vital factors to treat COVID-19. For example, in the preparation of liposomes by the heating method compared to conventional methods, such as the ethanol injection, anionic liposomes displayed homogenous size ranges, stabilities for more than eight months, and no toxicity for the 400 nm and 100 nm diameter toward the human bronchial epithelial cell line [83].
Solid lipid NPs (SLNs), nanostructure lipid carriers (NLCs), lipid–drug conjugates (LDCs), and polymer–drug conjugates (PDCs) are other lipid-based NPs, which can be employed to load and encapsulate antiviral agents (Figure 4) [84]. Specific advantages involving biodegradability, biocompatibility, low degradation of the drug in physiological conditions owing to encapsulation, efficient drug loading, increased half-life of drug, controlled release and sustained release of therapeutic agents, improved drug absorption and dissolution, desirable bioavailability, passive and active targeting capacity, simple sterilization, and large scale production are demonstrated by these colloidal carriers [85,86].
In the following section, some important micellar, liposomal, and lipid NP formulations are presented as novel carriers for encapsulation and loading of antiviral agents. This may be useful in obtaining a new viewpoint about microformulations and nanoformulations of antiviral agents against health-threatening diseases caused by coronaviruses particularly COVID-19 pneumonia.

5. Micellar, Liposomal, and Lipid NP Formulations

Mixed micelles are formed by the self-assembly of two different di- or tri-block copolymers of surfactants in a colloidal medium [87]. The bioavailability of poorly water-soluble drugs can be augmented by polymeric mixed micelles. Efavirenz (EFV) is a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor which is recommended as an oral administration with other antiviral agents against HIV. Recent information suggests that this drug may inhibit SARS-CoV-2 by a combination with other antiretroviral drugs [88]. The high hydrophobic property of this drug leads to a lower bioavailability and dose-dependent side effects on the central nervous system (CNS). Loading of EFV by mixed micelles prepared by the use of Pluronic® F127 and Tetronic® T904 showed the enhanced bioavailability of this drug by four folds [89]. Viral RNA replication and translation are inhibited by a camptothecin drug as a topoisomerase inhibitor [90]. A polymethacrylate block containing 2,6-diacylaminopyridine pendant (DAP) units and a PEG (at 2000 (PEG2) and 10,000 (PEG10) molar masses) were utilized to encapsulate this hydrophobic drug in a spherical micelle with a maximum diameter size of 25 nm. Improved stability under acidic conditions and a controlled drug release was observed for the prepared micelle by PEG10 compared to the PEG2 unit [91]. Nelfinavir mesylate (NFM), an antiretroviral drug, is a HIV-1 protease inhibitor which also has reported antiviral activities toward SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 [92]. A short half-life of 3.5 to 5 h and its lipophilic nature are two major disadvantages for oral administration consideration. Loading NFM by mixed micelles (with an average diameter size of 104.1 nm) composed of pluronic F127 and D-α-tocopheryl polyethylene glycol 1000 succinate (TPGS) improved drug loading, entrapment efficiency, bioavailability, sustained drug release and biodegradability [93].
The use of essential oils or various extracts of plants to treat microbial infections has a long history in traditional and modern medicine. These properties have resulted from the existence of active metabolites in several parts of medicinal plants. For example, artemisinin and its derivative, dihydroartemisinin, are two sesquiterpene lactone metabolites extracted from the Artemisia annua plant species with anti-parasitic effects [94,95]. Moreover, there are several reports of anti-infection properties in the case of other species of the Artemisia plant genus [96]. Potential antiviral activities of essential oils extracted from Artemisia arborescens toward herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) was evaluated by a liposomal formulation [97]. In the general sense, one strategy towards controlling and managing the pandemic is to design and formulate efficient vaccines against the virus. In the case of mRNA vaccines, a carrier system is strictly required in order to protect the sensitive structure of mRNA molecules and deliver the active agent to certain cells of the immune system (drug targeting) to induce the expected immunization. Amongst the available strategies for the encapsulation and targeting drugs and active agents are liposomes, nanoliposomes, solid lipid nanoparticles and tocosomes [98]. Using an antiviral sample, compound and derived lipids, as well as immuno-modulator lipids, are other strategies to synthesize novel antiviral carriers or vaccine-based liposomes [79]. As a viral mimic, a double-stranded RNA of polyinosinic–polycytidylic acid and poly-L-lysine (poly-ICLC) is utilized as a prophylactic and antiviral agent for viral infections [99]. Upregulation of the expression of β-, γ- and α-interferon has resulted from the poly-ICLC effect. Further antiviral activities against Dengue virus (DENV) were shown for the liposomal formulation of poly-ICLC compared to poly-ICLC alone by the higher expression of IFN-γ and the promotion of innate immunity [100]. As previously mentioned, loading antibody fragments on the surface of liposomes may be another way to functionalize actively targeted carriers. Coupling llama heavy-chain antibody fragments (Vhh) onto the PEGylated liposome surface via covalent and non-covalent bonds having dapivirine, a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor, resulted in a reduction of HIV replication in vitro. A strong binding affinity to HIV-1 envelope glycoprotein gp120 and reduced neutralization potency were observed for covalently linked Vhh compared with a non-covalent one. In this regard, free antibodies with non-covalent bonds demonstrated a higher number of Vhh to bind to gp120 [101]. The thin-film hydration technique was utilized to prepare EFV-loaded liposomes with average diameter sizes and significant encapsulation efficiencies of 411.1 nm and 98.86%, respectively. The high encapsulation efficiency of this formulation was obtained using the soybean lecithin in the bilayer of the liposome, which had a solubilizing effect on EFV [102]. Lipid compounds may be employed to coat other organic or inorganic NPs such as polymeric NPs, metal NPs (MNPs), metal oxide NPs (MONPs) and mesoporous silica NPs (MSNs). For instance, ML336, a benzamidine antiviral medicine, was encapsulated via liposome-coated MSNs against the Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus (VEEV) (Figure 5). In vitro inhibition of VEEV resulted from improved circulation time and biocompatibility, as well as with a sustained drug release (6.6 ± 1.3 μg/mg) over 24 h [103].
Adefovir dipivoxil, a nucleotide analogue to decrease DNA level of hepatitis B virus (HBV) in serum, was loaded on SLNs towards the HepG2.2.15 cell line derived from the chronic HBV infection. Prepared drug–SLN formulations with a mean size of 389.4 ± 166.5 nm displayed sustained drug release. These formulations also displayed values of 15.32 ± 2.58% and 3.06 ± 0.51% for drug entrapment efficiency and drug loading, respectively [104]. The LDC form (PEGylated lipid–indinavir NPs) was activated by binding peptides of CD4-BP2 and CD4-BP4 to target CD4+ cells. Efficient drug delivery and indinavir release at acidic conditions (pH = 5) of endosome were explained as a pH-dependent drug release model for these carriers [105].

6. Application of Lectins in Micelle and Liposome Formulation

In this section, the functionalization of micelles and liposomes by several types of lectin is presented for non-viral infections because of the lack of this modification for antiviral purposes. Therefore, these examples can be useful to prepare novel formulations of vaccines or antiviral agents by lectin-modified micelles and liposomes in future investigations. To date, there is a lack of studies regarding modification of micelles by lectin. As one promising example, concanavalin A (Con A) lectin was conjugated to poly(ε-caprolactone)-block-glycopolymer micelles to improve mucoadhesiveness [106]. However, lectin modification of liposomes is more efficient owing to the stability of their bilayer structure compared to a micelle. As illustrated in Table 1, several interactions between liposomal components and lectins were used to prepare lectin-modified liposomes.

7. Conclusions

The commonly exploited micro- and nano-vesicles with a single bilayer leaflet for passive and active drug delivery applications are liposomes. In this regard, promising cell-binding drug carriers in the delivery of antiviral agents and vaccines can be obtained by actively using targeted micro- and nano-liposomes. The use of lipids with immuno-stimulatory effects is one approach to prepare efficient vaccines. The ability of lectins, particularly herbal lectins, to bind carbohydrate components of viruses may be a suitable strategy for targeting coronaviruses. To this end, MBL related to red alga has received considerable attention owing to its strong binding with the spike glycoprotein of coronaviruses. It is worth mentioning that there are not enough investigations about lectin-modified liposomal formulations for coronaviruses. Therefore, in future studies, it is expected that new generations of the cell-binding liposomes based on lectin functionalization with the capacity to encapsulate antiviral agents on the surface, bilayer, and aqueous sections will be investigated. It is also worth noting that other promising approaches, such as using hrsACE2 to functionalize the liposomal or micellar surface, can also improve this type of active carrier. Moreover, the cell type employed to grow the virus stocks is a critical factor to determine the inhibition capacity of micellar and liposomal formulations towards coronaviruses. For instance, in physiological conditions of the body, considering the function of the immune system is an important factor in understanding of antiviral activities of these formulations. Additionally, the testing of various types of lectins is vital because of the altering of the N-glycosylation pattern of coronavirus glycoproteins by genetic mutations. Therefore, many curious in vitro and in vivo studies are required to achieve these objectives.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.A. and A.N.; writing—original draft preparation, M.A.; writing—review and editing, A.N., M.A. and K.A.-A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Banerjee, A.; Kulcsar, K.; Misra, V.; Frieman, M.; Mossman, K. Bats and Coronaviruses. Viruses 2019, 11, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Belouzard, S.; Millet, J.K.; Licitra, B.N.; Whittaker, G.R. Mechanisms of coronavirus cell entry mediated by the viral spike protein. Viruses 2012, 4, 1011–1033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Jiang, Y.; Cheng, X.; Zhao, X.; Yu, Y.; Gao, M.; Zhou, S. Recombinant infectious bronchitis coronavirus H120 with the spike protein S1 gene of the nephropathogenic IBYZ strain remains attenuated but induces protective immunity. Vaccine 2020, 38, 3157–3168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Guan, X.; Li, H.; Han, M.; Jia, S.; Feng, B.; Gao, X.; Wang, Z.; Jiang, Y.; Cui, W.; Wang, L.; et al. Epidemiological investigation of feline infectious peritonitis in cats living in Harbin, Northeast China from 2017 to 2019 using a combination of an EvaGreen-based real-time RT-PCR and serum chemistry assays. Mol. Cell. Probes 2020, 49, 101495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Deng, X.; StJohn, S.E.; Osswald, H.L.; O’Brien, A.; Banach, B.S.; Sleeman, K.; Ghosh, A.K.; Mesecar, A.D.; Baker, S.C. Coronaviruses Resistant to a 3C-Like Protease Inhibitor Are Attenuated for Replication and Pathogenesis, Revealing a Low Genetic Barrier but High Fitness Cost of Resistance. J. Virol. 2014, 88, 11886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Hudson, C.B.; Beaudette, F.R. Infection of the cloaca with the virus of infectious bronchitis. Science 1932, 76, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Schoeman, D.; Fielding, B.C. Coronavirus envelope protein: Current knowledge. Virol. J. 2019, 16, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Xu, Z.; Shi, L.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, J.; Huang, L.; Zhang, C.; Liu, S.; Zhao, P.; Liu, H.; Zhu, L.; et al. Pathological findings of COVID-19 associated with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Lancet Respir. Med. 2020, 8, 420–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Grasselli, G.; Zangrillo, A.; Zanella, A.; Antonelli, M.; Cabrini, L.; Castelli, A.; Cereda, D.; Coluccello, A.; Foti, G.; Fumagalli, R.; et al. Baseline characteristics and outcomes of 1591 patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 admitted to ICUs of the Lombardy Region, Italy. JAMA 2020, 323, 1574–1581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Lai, C.-C.; Shih, T.-P.; Ko, W.-C.; Tang, H.-J.; Hsueh, P.-R. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and corona virus disease-2019 (COVID-19): The epidemic and the challenges. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2020, 55, 105924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Coutard, B.; Valle, C.; de Lamballerie, X.; Canard, B.; Seidah, N.G.; Decroly, E. The spike glycoprotein of the new coronavirus 2019-nCoV contains a furin-like cleavage site absent in CoV of the same clade. Antivir. Res. 2020, 176, 104742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Chang, L.; Yan, Y.; Wang, L. Coronavirus Disease 2019: Coronaviruses and Blood Safety. Transfus. Med. Rev. 2020, 34, 75–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Xu, Y.; Li, X.; Zhu, B.; Liang, H.; Fang, C.; Gong, Y.; Guo, Q.; Sun, X.; Zhao, D.; Shen, J.; et al. Characteristics of pediatric SARS-CoV-2 infection and potential evidence for persistent fecal viral shedding. Nat. Med. 2020, 26, 502–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Zhou, Z.; Sun, Y.; Yan, X.; Tang, X.; Li, Q.; Tan, Y.; Lan, T.; Ma, J. Swine acute diarrhea syndrome coronavirus (SADS-CoV) antagonizes interferon-β production via blocking IPS-1 and RIG-I. Virus. Res. 2020, 278, 197843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wang, M.; Cao, R.; Zhang, L.; Yang, X.; Liu, J.; Xu, M.; Shi, Z.; Hu, Z.; Zhong, W.; Xiao, G. Remdesivir and chloroquine effectively inhibit the recently emerged novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) in vitro. Cell. Res. 2020, 30, 269–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Touret, F.; de Lamballerie, X. Of chloroquine and COVID-19. Antivir. Res. 2020, 177, 104762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Deng, L.; Li, C.; Zeng, Q.; Liu, X.; Li, X.; Zhang, H.; Hong, Z.; Xia, J. Arbidol combined with LPV/r versus LPV/r alone against Corona Virus Disease 2019: A retrospective cohort study. J. Infect. 2020, 81, e1–e5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Brüssow, H. The Novel Coronavirus—A Snapshot of Current Knowledge. Microb. Biotechnol. 2020, 13, 607–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Dong, L.; Hu, S.; Gao, J. Discovering drugs to treat coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Drug. Discov. Ther. 2020, 14, 58–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Stockman, L.J.; Bellamy, R.; Garner, P. SARS: Systematic review of treatment effects. PLoS Med. 2006, 3, e343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Chu, C.M.; Cheng, V.C.C.; Hung, I.F.N.; Wong, M.M.L.; Chan, K.H.; Chan, K.S.; Kao, R.Y.T.; Poon, L.l.M.; Wong, C.L.P.; Guan, Y.; et al. Role of lopinavir/ritonavir in the treatment of SARS: Initial virological and clinical findings. Thorax 2004, 59, 252–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Liu, J.; Cao, R.; Xu, M.; Wang, X.; Zhang, H.; Hu, H.; Li, Y.; Hu, Z.; Zhong, W.; Wang, M. Hydroxychloroquine, a less toxic derivative of chloroquine, is effective in inhibiting SARS-CoV-2 infection in vitro. Cell. Discov. 2020, 6, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Yao, X.; Ye, F.; Zhang, M.; Cui, C.; Huang, B.; Niu, P.; Liu, X.; Zhao, L.; Dong, E.; Somg, C.; et al. In vitro antiviral activity and projection of optimized dosing design of hydroxychloroquine for the treatment of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Clin. Infect. Dis. 2020, 71, 732–739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Chen, Z.; Hu, J.; Zhang, Z.; Shan, J.; Shoumeng, H.; Dandan, Y.; Ruhong, Z.; Ben, H.; Zhan, Z. Efficacy of hydroxychloroquine in patients with COVID-19: Results of a randomized clinical trial. MedRxiv 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Gautret, P.; Lagier, J.-C.; Parola, P.; Hoang, V.-T.; Meddeb, L.; Mailhe, M.; Doudier, B.; Courjon, J.; Giordanengo, V.; Vieira, V.-E.; et al. Hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin as a treatment of COVID-19: Results of an open-label non-randomized clinical trial. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2020, 56, 105949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Fan, J.; Zhang, X.; Liu, J.; Yang, Y.; Zheng, N.; Liu, Q.; Bergman, K.; Reynolds, K.; Huang, S.-M.; Zhu, H.; et al. Connecting hydroxychloroquine in vitro antiviral activity to in vivo concentration for prediction of antiviral effect: A critical step in treating COVID-19 patients. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Tai, T.-T.; Wu, T.-J.; Wu, H.-D.; Tsai, Y.-C.; Wang, H.-T.; Wang, A.-M.; Shih, S.-F.; Chen, Y.-C. A Strategy to Treat COVID-19 Disease with Targeted Delivery of Inhalable Liposomal Hydroxychloroquine: A Non-clinical Pharmacokinetic Study. bioRxiv 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Feliciello, I.; Procino, A. The pulmonary-proteoliposome as a new therapeutic approach for Coronaviruses. Hum. Vaccines Immunother. 2020, 16, 2373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Croxtall, J.D.; Perry, C.M. Lopinavir/Ritonavir: A review of its use in the management of HIV-1 infection. Drugs 2010, 70, 1885–1915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Reyskens, K.M.S.E.; Fisher, T.-L.; Schisler, J.C.; O’Connor, W.G.; Rogers, A.B.; Willis, M.S.; Planesse, C.; Boyer, F.; Rondeau, P.; Bourdon, E.; et al. Cardio-metabolic effects of HIV protease inhibitors (lopinavir/ritonavir). PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e73347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Deeks, E.D. Darunavir: A review of its use in the management of HIV-1 infection. Drugs 2014, 74, 99–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Stabel, J.; Krueger, L.; Jenvey, C.; Wherry, T.; Hostetter, J.; Beitz, D. Influence of Colostrum and Vitamins A, D3, and E on Early Intestinal Colonization of Neonatal Holstein Calves Infected with Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis. J. Vet. Sci. 2019, 6, 93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Zhang, L.; Liu, Y. Potential interventions for novel coronavirus in China: A systematic review. J. Med. Virol. 2020, 92, 479–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Trottier, C.; Colombo, M.; Mann, K.K.; Miller, W.H., Jr.; Ward, B.J. Retinoids inhibit measles virus through a type I IFN-dependent bystander effect. FASEB J. 2009, 23, 3203–3212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Kyme, P.; Thoennissen, N.H.; Tseng, C.W.; Thoennissen, G.B.; Wolf, A.J.; Shimada, K.; Krung, U.O.; Lee, K.; Müller-Tidow, C.; Berdel, W.E.; et al. C/EBPε mediates nicotinamide-enhanced clearance of Staphylococcus aureus in mice. J. Clin. Investig. 2012, 122, 3316–3329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Jones, H.D.; Yoo, J.; Crother, T.R.; Kyme, P.; Ben-Shlomo, A.; Khalafi, R.; Tseng, C.W.; Parks, W.C.; Arditi, M.; Liu, G.Y.; et al. Nicotinamide exacerbates hypoxemia in ventilator-induced lung injury independent of neutrophil infiltration. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0123460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Li, W.; Moore, M.J.; Vasilieva, N.; Sui, J.; wong, S.k.; Berne, M.A.; Somasundaran, M.; Sullivan, J.L.; Luzuriage, K.; Greenough, T.C.; et al. Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 is a functional receptor for the SARS coronavirus. Nature 2003, 426, 450–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Park, J.Y.; Kim, J.H.; Kwon, J.M.; Kwon, H.-J.; Jeong, H.J.; Kim, Y.M.; kim, D.; Lee, W.S.; Ryu, Y.B. Dieckol, a SARS-CoV 3CL(pro) inhibitor, isolated from the edible brown algae Ecklonia cava. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2013, 21, 3730–3737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Zhang, D.-H.; Wu, K.-L.; Zhang, X.; Deng, S.-Q.; Peng, B. In silico screening of Chinese herbal medicines with the potential to directly inhibit 2019 novel coronavirus. J. Integr. Med. 2020, 18, 152–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Keyaerts, E.; Vijgen, L.; Pannecouque, C.; Damme, E.V.; Peumans, W.; Egberink, H.; Balzarini, J.; Ranst, M.V. Plant lectins are potent inhibitors of coronaviruses by interfering with two targets in the viral replication cycle. Antivir. Res. 2007, 75, 179–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Monteil, V.; Kwon, H.; Prado, P.; Hagelkrüys, A.; Wimmer, R.A.; Stahl, M.; Leopoldi, A.; Garreta, E.; Hurtado Del Pozo, C.; Prosper, F.; et al. Inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 infections in engineered human tissues using clinical-grade soluble human ACE2. Cell 2020, 181, 905–913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Ip, W.K.E.; Chan, K.H.; Law, H.K.W.; Tso, G.H.W.; Kong, E.K.P.; Wong, W.H.S.; To, Y.F.; Yung, R.W.H.; Chow, E.Y.; Au, K.L.; et al. Mannose-Binding Lectin in Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus Infection. J. Infect. Dis. 2005, 191, 1697–1704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Fang, L.; Karakiulakis, G.; Roth, M. Are patients with hypertension and diabetes mellitus at increased risk for COVID-19 infection? Lancet Respir. Med. 2020, 8, e21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Hwang, H.-J.; Han, J.-W.; Jeon, H.; Cho, k.; Kim, J.-H.; Lee, D.-S.; Han, J.W. Characterization of a Novel Mannose-Binding Lectin with Antiviral Activities from Red Alga, Grateloupia chiangii. Biomolecules 2020, 10, 333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Breitenbach Barroso Coelho, L.C.; Marcelino dos Santos Silva, P.; Felix de Oliveira, W.; De Moura, M.C.; Viana Pontual, E.; Soares Gomes, F.; Guedes Paiva, P.M.; Napoleão, T.H.; Dos Santos Correia, M.T. Lectins as antimicrobial agents. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2018, 125, 1238–1252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Liang, Z.; Yang, L.; Zheng, J.; Zuo, H.; Weng, S.; He, J.; Xu, X. A low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) class A domain-containing C-type lectin from Litopenaeus vannamei plays opposite roles in antibacterial and antiviral responses. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 2019, 92, 29–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Zhou, Y.; Lu, K.; Pfefferle, S.; Bertram, S.; Glowacka, I.; Drosten, C.; Pöhlmann, S.; Simmons, G. A single asparagine-linked glycosylation site of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus spike glycoprotein facilitates inhibition by mannose-binding lectin through multiple mechanisms. J. Virol. 2010, 84, 8753–8764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Auriti, C.; Prencipe, G.; Moriondo, M.; Bersani, I.; Bertaina, C.; Mondi, V.; Inglese, R. Mannose-binding lectin: Biologic characteristics and role in the susceptibility to infections and ischemia-reperfusion related injury in critically ill neonates. J. Immunol. Res. 2017, 2017, 7045630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Zhang, W.; Bouwman, K.M.; van Beurden, S.J.; Ordonez, S.R.; van Eijk, M.; Haagsman, H.P.; Hélène Verheige, M.; Veldhuizen, E.J.A. Chicken mannose binding lectin has antiviral activity towards infectious bronchitis virus. Virology 2017, 509, 252–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Weiskirchen, R. Severity of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): Does surfactant matter? Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 1905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Mazalovska, M.; Kouokam, J.C. Lectins as promising therapeutics for the prevention and treatment of HIV and other potential coinfections. Biomed. Res. Int. 2018, 8, 3750646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Li, G.; De Clercq, E. Therapeutic options for the 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV). Nat. Rev. Drug. Discov. 2020, 19, 149–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Lee, C. Griffithsin, a Highly Potent Broad-Spectrum Antiviral Lectin from Red Algae: From Discovery to Clinical Application. Mar. Drugs 2019, 17, 567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Takebe, Y.; Saucedo, C.J.; Lund, G.; Uenishi, R.; Hase, S.; Tsuchiura, T.; Kneteman, N.; Ramessar, K.; Tyrrell, D.L.J.; Shirakura, M.; et al. Antiviral lectins from red and blue-green algae show potent in vitro and in vivo activity against hepatitis C virus. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e64449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Gautam, A.K.; Sharma, D.; Sharma, J.; Saini, K.C. Legume lectins: Potential use as a diagnostics and therapeutics against the Cancer. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 142, 474–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Cavada, B.S.; Osterne, V.J.S.; Oliveira, M.V.; Pinto-Junior, V.R.; Silva, M.T.L.; Bari, A.U.; Lima, L.D.; Lossio, C.F.; Nascimento, K.S. Reviewing Mimosoideae lectins: A group of under explored legume lectins. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 154, 159–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Walls, A.C.; Park, Y.-J.; Tortorici, M.A.; Wall, A.; McGuire, A.T.; Veesler, D. Structure, function, and antigenicity of the SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein. Cell 2020, 181, 281–292.e6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Van der Meer, F.; de Haan, C.A.M.; Schuurman, N.M.P.; Haijema, B.J.; Verheije, M.H.; Bosch, B.J.; Egberink, H.F. The carbohydrate-binding plant lectins and the non-peptidic antibiotic pradimicin A target the glycans of the coronavirus envelope glycoproteins. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2007, 60, 741–749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Bhutia, S.K.; Panda, P.K.; Sinha, N.; Praharaj, P.P.; Bhol, C.S.; Panigrahi, D.P.; Mahapatra, K.K.; Saha, S.; Patra, S.; Mishra, S.R.; et al. Plant lectins in cancer therapeutics: Targeting apoptosis and autophagy-dependent cell death. Pharmacol. Res. 2019, 144, 8–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Gondim, A.C.S.; da Silva, S.R.; Mathys, L.; Noppen, S.; Liekens, S.; Sampaio, A.H.; Nagano, C.S.; Rocha, C.R.C.; Nascimento, K.S.; Cavada, B.S.; et al. Potent antiviral activity of carbohydrate-specific algal and leguminous lectins from the Brazilian biodiversity. MedChemComm 2019, 10, 390–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Alavi, M.; Rai, M. Recent advances in antibacterial applications of metal nanoparticles (MNPs) and metal nanocomposites (MNCs) against multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria. Expert Rev. Anti-Infect. 2019, 17, 419–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Bonilla-Gameros, L.; Chevallier, P.; Sarkissian, A.; Mantovani, D. Silver-based antibacterial strategies for healthcare-associated infections: Processes, challenges, and regulations. An integrated review. Nanomedicine 2020, 24, 102142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Alavi, M.; Rai, M. Topical delivery of growth factors and metal/metal oxide nanoparticles to infected wounds by polymeric nanoparticles: An overview. Expert Rev. Anti-Infect. 2020, 18, 1021–1032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Alavi, M.; Jabari, E.; Jabbari, E. Functionalized carbon-based nanomaterials and quantum dots with antibacterial activity: A review. Expert Rev. Anti-Infect 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Alavi, M.; Rai, M. Recent progress in nanoformulations of silver nanoparticles with cellulose, chitosan, and alginic acid biopolymers for antibacterial applications. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2019, 103, 8669–8676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Wu, G.; Ji, H.; Guo, X.; Li, Y.; Ren, T.; Dong, H.; Liu, J.; Liu, Y.; Shi, X.; He, B. Nanoparticle reinforced bacterial outer-membrane vesicles effectively prevent fatal infection of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae. Nanomedicine 2020, 24, 102148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Aljelehawy, Q.; Karimi, N.; Alavi, M. Comparison of antibacterial and cytotoxic activities of phytosynthesized ZnONPs by leaves extract of Daphne mucronata at different salt sources. Mater. Technol. 2020, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Alavi, M.; Karimi, N. Ultrasound assisted-phytofabricated Fe3O4 NPs with antioxidant properties and antibacterial effects on growth, biofilm formation, and spreading ability of multidrug resistant bacteria. Artif. Cell. Nanomed. B 2019, 47, 2405–2423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Alavi, M.; Karimi, N. Hemoglobin self-assembly and antibacterial activities of bio-modified Ag-MgO nanocomposites by different concentrations of Artemisia haussknechtii and Protoparmeliopsis muralis extracts. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 152, 1174–1185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Alavi, M.; Nokhodchi, A. Antimicrobial and wound treatment aspects of micro-and nanoformulations of carboxymethyl, dialdehyde, and TEMPO-Oxidized derivatives of cellulose: Recent Advances. Macromol. Biosci. 2020, 20, 1900362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Alavi, M. Applications of chitosan and nanochitosan in formulation of novel antibacterial and wound healing agents. In Nanotechnology in Skin, Soft Tissue, and Bone Infections; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2020; pp. 169–181. [Google Scholar]
  72. Silva, J.V.C.; Jacquette, B.; Amagliani, L.; Schmitt, C.; Nicolai, T.; Chassenieux, C. Heat-induced gelation of micellar casein/plant protein oil-in-water emulsions. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2019, 569, 85–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Rahdar, A.; Salmani, S.; Sahoo, D. Effect of the reverse micelle and oil content in reverse micelle on nonlinear optical properties of Rhodamine B. J. Mol. Struct. 2019, 1191, 237–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Wang, D.-Y.; Van Der Mei, H.C.; Ren, Y.; Busscher, H.J.; Shi, L. Lipid-Based Antimicrobial Delivery-Systems for the Treatment of Bacterial Infections. Front. Chem. 2019, 10, 872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Al-Amin, M.D.; Bellato, F.; Mastrotto, F.; Garofalo, M.; Malfanti, A.; Salmaso, S.; Caliceti, P. Dexamethasone Loaded Liposomes by Thin-Film Hydration and Microfluidic Procedures: Formulation Challenges. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 1611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Alavi, M.; Varma, R.S. Overview of novel strategies for the delivery of anthracyclines to cancer cells by liposomal and polymeric nanoformulations. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 164, 2197–2203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Alavi, M.; Karimi, N.; Safaei, M. Application of various types of liposomes in drug delivery systems. Adv. Pharm. Bull. 2017, 7, 3–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Zhang, Y.; Huang, L. Liposomal delivery system. In Nanoparticles for Biomedical Applications; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020; pp. 145–152. [Google Scholar]
  79. Joshi, S.; Bawage, S.; Tiwari, P.; Kirby, D.; Perrie, Y.; Dennis, V.; Singh, S. Liposomes: A promising carrier for respiratory syncytial virus therapeutics. Expert Opin. Drug. Del. 2019, 16, 969–980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Alavi, M.; Hamidi, M. Passive and active targeting in cancer therapy by liposomes and lipid nanoparticles. DMPT 2019, 34, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. de Freitas, C.F.; Montanha, M.C.; Pellosi, D.S.; Kimura, E.; Caetano, W.; Hioka, N. Biotin-targeted mixed liposomes: A smart strategy for selective release of a photosensitizer agent in cancer cells. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2019, 104, 109923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Mohamed, M.; Abu Lila, A.S.; Shimizu, T.; Alaaeldin, E.; Hussein, A.; Sarhan, H.A.; Szebeni, J.; Ishida, T. PEGylated liposomes: Immunological responses. Sci. Technol. Adv. Mat. 2019, 20, 710–724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  83. Mozafari, M.R.; Reed, C.J.; Rostron, C.; Kocum, C.; Piskin, E. Formation and characterisation of non-toxic anionic liposomes for delivery of therapeutic agents to the pulmonary airways. Cell. Mol. Biol. Lett. 2002, 7, 243–244. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  84. Foca, A.; Dhillon, A.; Lahlali, T.; Lucifora, J.; Salvetti, A.; Rivoire, M.; Lee, A.; Durantel, D. Antiviral activity of PLK1-targeting siRNA delivered by lipid nanoparticles in HBV-infected hepatocytes. Antivir. Ther. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Shah, R.; Eldridge, D.; Palombo, E.; Harding, I. Lipid Nanoparticles: Production, Characterization and Stability; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  86. Kovačević, A.B.; Müller, R.H.; Keck, C.M. Formulation development of lipid nanoparticles: Improved lipid screening and development of tacrolimus loaded nanostructured lipid carriers (NLC). Int. J. Pharm. 2020, 576, 118918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Singh, V.; Khullar, P.; Dave, P.N.; Kaur, N. Micelles, mixed micelles, and applications of polyoxypropylene (PPO)-polyoxyethylene (PEO)-polyoxypropylene (PPO) triblock polymers. IJIC 2013, 4, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Tang, B.; Li, S.; Xiong, Y.; Tian, M.; Yu, J.; Xu, L.; Zhang, L.; Li, Z.; Ma, J.; Wen, F.; et al. Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pneumonia in a Hemodialysis Patient. Kidney Med. 2020, 2, 354–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Chiappetta, D.A.; Hocht, C.; Opezzo, J.A.W.; Sosnik, A. Intranasal administration of antiretroviral-loaded micelles for anatomical targeting to the brain in HIV. Nanomedicine 2013, 8, 223–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Wu, K.X.; Chu, J.J.-H. Antiviral screen identifies EV71 inhibitors and reveals camptothecin-target, DNA topoisomerase 1 as a novel EV71 host factor. Antivir. Res. 2017, 143, 122–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Concellón, A.; Clavería-Gimeno, R.; Velázquez-Campoy, A.; Abian, O.; Piñol, M.; Oriol, L. Polymeric micelles from block copolymers containing 2, 6-diacylaminopyridine units for encapsulation of hydrophobic drugs. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 24066–24075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  92. Yamamoto, N.; Yang, R.; Yoshinaka, Y.; Amari, S.; Nakano, T.; Cinatl, J.; Rabenau, H.; Doerr, H.W.; Hunsmann, G.; Otaka, A.; et al. HIV protease inhibitor nelfinavir inhibits replication of SARS-associated coronavirus. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2004, 318, 719–725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Patil, P.H.; Mahajan, H.S. Mixed micelles for bioavailability enhancement of nelfinavir mesylate: In vitro characterisation and In vivo pharmacokinetic study. Mater. Technol. 2018, 33, 793–802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Birnbaum, J.; Scharf, S.; Schmidt, S.; Jonscher, E.; Hoeijmakers, W.A.M.; Flemming, S.; Toenhake, C.G.; Schmitt, M.; Sabitzki, R.; Bergmann, B.; et al. A Kelch13-defined endocytosis pathway mediates artemisinin resistance in malaria parasites. Science 2020, 367, 51–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. van der Pluijm, R.W.; Imwong, M.; Chau, N.H.; Hoa, N.T.; Thuy-Nhien, N.T.; Thanh, N.V.; Jittamala, P.; Hanboonkunupakarn, B.; Chutasmit, K.; Saelow, C.; et al. Determinants of dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine treatment failure in Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Cambodia, Thailand, and Vietnam: A prospective clinical, pharmacological, and genetic study. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2019, 19, 952–961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  96. Alavi, M.; Karimi, N.; Salimikia, I. Phytosynthesis of zinc oxide nanoparticles and its antibacterial, antiquorum sensing, antimotility, and antioxidant capacities against multidrug resistant bacteria. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2019, 72, 457–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Sinico, C.; De Logu, A.; Lai, F.; Valenti, D.; Manconi, M.; Loy, G.; Bonsignore, L.; Fadda, A.M. Liposomal incorporation of Artemisia arborescens L. essential oil and in vitro antiviral activity. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2005, 59, 161–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Zarrabi, A.; Alipoor Amro Abadi, M.; Khorasani, S.; Mohammadabadi, M.R.; Jamshidi, A.; Torkaman, S.; Taghavi, E.; Mozafari, M.R.; Rasti, B. Nanoliposomes and tocosomes as multifunctional nanocarriers for the encapsulation of nutraceutical and Dietary Molecules. Molecules 2020, 25, 638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  99. Saxena, M.; Sabado, R.L.; La Mar, M.; Mohri, H.; Salazar, A.M.; Dong, H.; Da Rosa, J.C.; Markowitz, M.; Bhardwaj, N.; Miller, E. Poly-ICLC, a TLR3 Agonist, induces transient innate immune responses in patients with treated HIV-Infection: A randomized double-blinded placebo controlled trial [Clinical Trial]. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  100. Hu, Y.; Hu, Y.; Sun, L.; Wong, J.; Wang, M. Antiviral effects of liposome-encapsulated PolyICLC against Dengue virus in a mouse model. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2016, 478, 913–918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Wang, S.X.; Michiels, J.; Ariën, K.K.; New, R.; Vanham, G.; Roitt, I. Inhibition of HIV virus by neutralizing Vhh attached to dual functional liposomes encapsulating dapivirine. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2016, 11, 350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  102. Okafor, N.I.; Nkanga, C.I.; Walker, R.B.; Noundou, X.S.; Krause, R.W.M. Encapsulation and physicochemical evaluation of efavirenz in liposomes. J. Pharm. Investig. 2020, 50, 201–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. LaBauve, A.E.; Rinker, T.E.; Noureddine, A.; Serda, R.E.; Howe, J.Y.; Sherman, M.B.; Rasley, A.; Brinker, C.J.; Sasaki, D.Y.; Negrete, O.A. Lipid-Coated mesoporous silica nanoparticles for the delivery of the ML336 antiviral to inhibit Encephalitic Alphavirus infection. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 13990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  104. Zhang, X.-G.; Miao, J.; Li, M.-W.; Jiang, S.-P.; Hu, F.-Q.; Du, Y.-Z. Solid lipid nanoparticles loading adefovir dipivoxil for antiviral therapy. J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. B 2008, 9, 506–510. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  105. Endsley, A.N.; Ho, R.J.Y. Enhanced anti-HIV efficacy of indinavir after inclusion in CD4-targeted lipid nanoparticles. J. Acquir. Immune Defic. Syndr. 2012, 61, 417–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  106. Li, N.N.; Cai, X.Y.; Chen, J.C.; Hu, X.F.; Xu, L.Q. Conjugation of lectin to poly (ε-caprolactone)-block-glycopolymer micelles for In Vitro intravesical drug delivery. Polymers 2016, 8, 379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  107. Chen, H.; Torchilin, V.; Langer, R. Lectin-bearing Polymerized Liposomes as Potential Oral Vaccine Carriers. Pharm. Res. 1996, 13, 1378–1383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Abu-Dahab, R.; Schäfer, U.F.; Lehr, C.-M. Lectin-functionalized liposomes for pulmonary drug delivery: Effect of nebulization on stability and bioadhesion. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2001, 14, 37–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Brück, A.; Abu-Dahab, R.; Borchard, G.; Schäfer, U.F.; Lehr, C.-M. Lectin-functionalized liposomes for pulmonary drug delivery: Interaction with human alveolar epithelial cells. J. Drug Target. 2001, 9, 241–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Andrade, C.A.S.; Correia, M.T.S.; Coelho, L.C.B.B.; Nascimento, S.C.; Santos-Magalhāes, N.S. Antitumor activity of Cratylia mollis lectin encapsulated into liposomes. Int. J. Pharm. 2004, 278, 435–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Zhang, N.; Ping, Q.N.; Huang, G.H.; Xu, W.F. Investigation of lectin-modified insulin liposomes as carriers for oral administration. Int. J. Pharm. 2005, 294, 247–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Della Giovampaola, C.; Capone, A.; Ermini, L.; Lupetti, P.; Vannuccini, E.; Finetti, F.; Donnini, S.; Ziche, M.; Magnani, A.; Leone, G.; et al. Formulation of liposomes functionalized with Lotus lectin and effective in targeting highly proliferative cells. BBA-Gen Subj. 2017, 1861, 860–870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Pereira, P.R.; Corrêa, A.C.N.T.F.; Vericimo, M.A.; Paschoalin, V.M.F. Tarin, a potential immunomodulator and COX-Inhibitor lectin found in Taro (Colocasia esculenta). Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food 2018, 17, 878–891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  114. Corrêa, A.C.; Vericimo, M.A.; Dashevskiy, A.; Pereira, P.R.; Paschoalin, V.M.F. Liposomal taro lectin nanocapsules control Human glioblastoma and mammary adenocarcinoma cell proliferation. Molecules 2019, 24, 471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  115. dos Santos, M.C.; Kroetz, T.; Dora, C.L.; Giacomelli, F.C.; Frizon, T.E.A.; Pich, C.T.; da Silva Pinto, L.; Soares, A.S.; Rodembusch, S.F.; de Lima, V.R.; et al. Elucidating Bauhinia variegata lectin/phosphatidylcholine interactions in lectin-containing liposomes. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2018, 519, 232–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Wijetunge, S.S.; Wen, J.; Yeh, C.-K.; Sun, Y. Lectin-Conjugated liposomes as biocompatible, bioadhesive drug carriers for the management of oral ulcerative lesions. ACS Appl. Biol. Mater. 2018, 1, 1487–1495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Zhang, N.; Ping, Q.; Huang, G.; Xu, W.; Cheng, Y.; Han, X. Lectin-modified solid lipid nanoparticles as carriers for oral administration of insulin. Int. J. Pharm. 2006, 327, 153–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Biomedicines 08 00580 g001 550
Figure 1. Schematic drawing of main components of spherical or pleiomorphic coronaviruses (credit: biorender.com).
Figure 1. Schematic drawing of main components of spherical or pleiomorphic coronaviruses (credit: biorender.com).
Biomedicines 08 00580 g001
Biomedicines 08 00580 g002 550
Figure 2. Mechanism of viral entry by function of two subunits of the spike protein (created in BioRender.com).
Figure 2. Mechanism of viral entry by function of two subunits of the spike protein (created in BioRender.com).
Biomedicines 08 00580 g002
Biomedicines 08 00580 g003 550
Figure 3. Schematic images of a normal micelle, reverse micelle, and liposome with common (PEGylation which is the modification of a protein, peptide or non-peptide molecule by the linking of one or more polyethylene glycol chains) and particular (by lectins) functionalization as well as the interaction of the lectin-modified liposome with spike glycoprotein of virus (only the cell image is extracted from the biorender.com website; the rest are drawn by the authors).
Figure 3. Schematic images of a normal micelle, reverse micelle, and liposome with common (PEGylation which is the modification of a protein, peptide or non-peptide molecule by the linking of one or more polyethylene glycol chains) and particular (by lectins) functionalization as well as the interaction of the lectin-modified liposome with spike glycoprotein of virus (only the cell image is extracted from the biorender.com website; the rest are drawn by the authors).
Biomedicines 08 00580 g003
Biomedicines 08 00580 g004 550
Figure 4. Encapsulation of lipophilic and hydrophilic drugs by a liposome (a), solid lipid nanoparticles (b), nanostructure lipid carriers (c), lipid–drug conjugates (d), and polymer–drug conjugates (e).
Figure 4. Encapsulation of lipophilic and hydrophilic drugs by a liposome (a), solid lipid nanoparticles (b), nanostructure lipid carriers (c), lipid–drug conjugates (d), and polymer–drug conjugates (e).
Biomedicines 08 00580 g004
Biomedicines 08 00580 g005 550
Figure 5. (a) Schematic and (b) TEM images of liposome-coated mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MSNs) with loading ML336 antiviral drug (scale bar = 50 nm) reproduced with permission from [103].
Figure 5. (a) Schematic and (b) TEM images of liposome-coated mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MSNs) with loading ML336 antiviral drug (scale bar = 50 nm) reproduced with permission from [103].
Biomedicines 08 00580 g005
Table
Table 1. Applications of several types of lectin in liposome formulations.
Table 1. Applications of several types of lectin in liposome formulations.
Sources of LectinApplication in LiposomeReferences
Wheat germ agglutinin (WGA) lectin of Triticum vulgare plantIncorporation of the lectin in the bilayer liposome for potential oral vaccine carriers.[107]
WGA lectin of T. vulgare plant WGA-modified liposome with the ability to bind the N-acetylglucosamine was used as an aerosol formulation for drug delivery to human alveolar epithelial cells.[108]
Con A, WGA, and soybean agglutinin (SBA) extracted from Canavalia ensifomis, T. vulgare, and Glycine max plant species, respectivelyCoupling lectins with liposomes with avidin/biotin technology. Con A, WGA, and SBA have carbohydrates specificity for α-D-mannose or α-D-glucose, N-acetyl-glucosamine oligomers and N-acetyl I-galactosamine, respectively.[109]
Cratylia mollis plant species Encapsulation of the lectin in the liposome.[110]
WGA lectin of T. vulgare plantPhosphatidylethanolamine in the bilayer was covalently bound to the lectin to prepare the WGA-modified liposome.[111]
Lectin extracted from Lotus tetragonolobus plant speciesFormation of oleic acid–lectin conjugation in the phospholipid bilayer of liposomes with the ability to bind glycans having alpha-1,2-linked fucose.[112]
Tarin lectin of Colocasia esculenta plant speciesThe lectin was encapsulated in the aqueous phase of a liposome. Tarin demonstrated a promising binding site for complex and high-mannose N-glycan chains related to viral surface antigens. This lectin can help a host to recover from infections by the stimulation of innate and adaptive immune responses.[113,114]
Lectin extracted from Bauhinia variegate plant speciesBased on FTIR and NMR analyses, there was a strong interaction between the lectin and phosphatidylcholine of the liposome in the outer and inner polar surface of the liposome. The rotational motion of the lipid group was restricted by this interaction.[115]
Lectin of T. vulgare plant, WGAInteraction of the lectin with the bilayer of the liposome resulted in cytoadhesive and cytoinvasive effects, as well as increased permeability in the cell membrane and cellular uptake compared with the non-lectin liposomes for oral epithelial cells[116]
WGA-N-glutaryl-phosphatidylethanolamineProtection of the drug against enzyme degradation in vitro as well as higher stabilization of WGA-modified SLNs compared to bare SLNs.[117]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Alavi, M.; Asare-Addo, K.; Nokhodchi, A. Lectin Protein as a Promising Component to Functionalize Micelles, Liposomes and Lipid NPs against Coronavirus. Biomedicines 2020, 8, 580. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines8120580

AMA Style

Alavi M, Asare-Addo K, Nokhodchi A. Lectin Protein as a Promising Component to Functionalize Micelles, Liposomes and Lipid NPs against Coronavirus. Biomedicines. 2020; 8(12):580. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines8120580

Chicago/Turabian Style

Alavi, Mehran, Kofi Asare-Addo, and Ali Nokhodchi. 2020. "Lectin Protein as a Promising Component to Functionalize Micelles, Liposomes and Lipid NPs against Coronavirus" Biomedicines 8, no. 12: 580. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines8120580

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop