1. Introduction
Liver resection and liver transplantation are the most effective treatments for hepatic malignancies and end-stage liver disease [
1]. However, the inevitable hepatic ischemia-reperfusion injury (HIRI) during these procedures is not only a key factor leading to severe complications such as postoperative liver failure and graft dysfunction but also greatly limits the quantity and quality of available donor livers [
2,
3]. Therefore, elucidating the pathophysiological mechanisms of HIRI and finding effective prevention and treatment strategies has become an urgent scientific issue in the field of liver surgery.
The pathological process of HIRI is complex, involving the synergistic action of multiple cellular and molecular mechanisms. When blood supply is restored, the ischemic tissue does not immediately return to normal; instead, it triggers more severe secondary damage, a phenomenon known as “reperfusion injury” [
4]. One of its core mechanisms is the excessive activation of a sterile inflammatory response [
5]. In the liver, resident macrophages—Kupffer cells—are the initiators and primary executors of this inflammatory response [
6,
7]. Studies have shown that during HIRI, activated Kupffer cells undergo significant phenotypic polarization, mainly divided into the classically activated pro-inflammatory M1 type and alternatively activated anti-inflammatory M2 type [
8]. M1 macrophages directly mediate hepatocyte damage by releasing large amounts of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and interleukin-6 (IL-6), as well as producing reactive oxygen species (ROS) [
9,
10], whereas M2 macrophages exert anti-inflammatory and tissue repair functions by secreting interleukin-10 (IL-10), among others [
8,
11]. Therefore, regulating the polarization balance of macrophages from the M1 to the M2 type is considered a highly promising therapeutic strategy for alleviating HIRI.
In recent years, natural polysaccharides have emerged as promising immunomodulatory agents for IRI due to their multi-target and low-toxicity profiles. For instance, astragalus polysaccharide and fucoidan have shown protective effects in cardiac and cerebral IRI models, partly through TLR4/NF-κB modulation. However, their efficacy in HIRI remains less explored, and structural heterogeneity often limits mechanistic clarity. Houttuynia cordata polysaccharide (HCP) stands out due to its well-documented anti-inflammatory and antioxidant activities in other inflammatory models, its unique structural features—such as high galacturonic acid content and specific branched architecture—that are predicted to favor interaction with pattern recognition receptors like TLR4, and the long-standing traditional use of Houttuynia cordata in treating inflammatory disorders. These attributes make HCP a compelling candidate for investigating macrophage-centered interventions in HIRI.
The Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) and its downstream nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-κB) signaling pathway play a central role in connecting the initial injury signal with macrophage-mediated inflammatory amplification [
12]. Under HIRI conditions, endogenous damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) released by necrotic hepatocytes can be recognized by TLR4 on the macrophage surface, activating the NF-κB signaling cascade via the myeloid differentiation factor 88 (MyD88)-dependent pathway [
12,
13]. Activated NF-κB (mainly the p65 subunit) translocates to the nucleus, initiating the transcription of various pro-inflammatory factors, including TNF-α and IL-6, and M1 polarization markers (such as iNOS), thereby forming a positive feedback loop that continuously exacerbates inflammatory injury [
14]. Substantial evidence indicates that inhibiting the TLR4/NF-κB pathway can effectively reduce the severity of HIRI [
15], making it a very attractive target for pharmacological intervention.
Houttuynia cordata Thunb. is a traditional Chinese medicine with the effects of clearing heat, detoxification, eliminating carbuncles, and draining pus. It is commonly used clinically for treating inflammatory diseases. Modern pharmacological studies have confirmed that
Houttuynia cordata polysaccharide (HCP) is one of its key active components responsible for anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and immunomodulatory effects [
16,
17]. However, whether HCP has a protective effect against HIRI, particularly whether its action is related to regulating the TLR4/NF-κB signaling pathway and macrophage polarization, remains unclear.
Based on the above background, this study proposes the scientific hypothesis: HCP may alleviate hepatic ischemia-reperfusion injury by targeting the TLR4 receptor, inhibiting the overactivation of the NF-κB signaling pathway, thereby regulating macrophage polarization from the pro-inflammatory M1 type to the anti-inflammatory M2 type.
To test this hypothesis, we comprehensively employed an in vivo mouse HIRI model and an in vitro cell hypoxia/reoxygenation (H/R) model to systematically evaluate the effects of HCP on liver injury, oxidative stress, and inflammatory response. We further explored its molecular mechanisms from the perspectives of macrophage phenotype regulation and the TLR4/NF-κB signaling pathway, while conducting reverse validation and direct interaction prediction using a TLR4 inhibitor and molecular docking techniques. Specifically, the TLR4 inhibitor TAK-242 was used to verify whether TLR4 is a necessary target of HCP, and molecular docking was applied to predict the direct binding between HCP and the TLR4/MD-2 complex. This study aims to provide a solid pharmacological basis for HCP as a novel natural hepatoprotective agent and to lay the foundation for its further development in perioperative liver protection.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Chemicals and Reagents
Houttuynia cordata polysaccharide (HCP) was extracted and purified from
Houttuynia cordata Thunb. in our laboratory. Analysis by high-performance gel permeation chromatography (HPGPC) and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) confirmed that its main component is a water-soluble pectic polysaccharide fraction, whose structure is consistent with the reported HCA4S1 [
18]. This fraction has an average molecular weight of approximately 21.7 kDa and is mainly composed of rhamnose (Rha), galacturonic acid (GalA), galactose (Gal), and arabinose (Ara). Its backbone consists of alternately linked 1,4-linked α-D-galacturonic acid and 1,2,4-linked α-L-rhamnose, with side chains primarily composed of galactose and arabinose attached to the C-4 position of the rhamnose residues. All subsequent in vivo and in vitro experiments in this study were conducted using this HCA4S1-enriched HCP fraction. To exclude confounding effects of endotoxin, the HCP fraction was verified to contain endotoxin levels below 0.1 EU/mg using a limulus amebocyte lysate (LAL) assay (Bioendo, Xiamen, China). N-acetylcysteine (NAC) and the TLR4 inhibitor TAK-242 were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Mouse ALT, AST, MDA, SOD, TNF-α, and IL-6 ELISA detection kits were purchased from Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute (Nanjing, China). Antibodies against TLR4, MyD88, NF-κB p65, phospho-NF-κB p65 (p-p65), iNOS, Arg-1, and β-actin were purchased from ProteinTech Group (Chicago, IL, USA). Flow cytometry antibodies CD86 and CD206 were purchased from BioLegend (San Diego, CA, USA).
2.2. Animal Model and Experimental Design
Male C57BL/6 mice (6–8 weeks old, weighing 20–25 g) were purchased from Vital River Laboratory Animal Technology Co., Ltd (Beijing, China). All animals were housed in an SPF environment with free access to food and water. All animal experimental procedures followed the guidelines of the Animal Ethics Committee of Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University and were approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University (Approval No.: 20250303A).
Dose selection was based on a pilot dose-response study (25, 50, 100, 200 mg/kg) in which 50 and 100 mg/kg provided significant hepatoprotection without adverse effects (no changes in body weight, behavior, or organ indices). These doses are also consistent with previous reports of HCP’s anti-inflammatory efficacy in murine models. Acute toxicity testing showed that a single i.p. dose up to 500 mg/kg caused no mortality or overt toxicity over 14 days.
Mice were randomly divided into 5 groups (n = 8/group):
Sham group: Only laparotomy and closure were performed without hepatic portal blockade.
Vehicle group (Model): The HIRI model was established, and an equal volume of normal saline was injected via the tail vein before reperfusion.
HCP Low-dose group (HIRI + HCP-L): The model was established as above, and HCP (50 mg/kg) was injected before reperfusion.
HCP High-dose group (HIRI + HCP-H): The model was established as above, and HCP (100 mg/kg) was injected before reperfusion.
Positive Control group (HIRI + NAC): The model was established as above, and NAC (150 mg/kg) was injected before reperfusion.
HCP was administered intraperitoneally once daily for three consecutive days before ischemia. This pre-treatment regimen was chosen because polysaccharides often require repeated administration to achieve stable immunomodulatory effects, and it aligns with common practice in HIRI pharmacologic studies where agents are given pre-emptively to establish adequate tissue levels and modulate baseline inflammatory status before ischemic insult.
The HIRI model was established according to the method described by Suzuki et al. Briefly, mice were anesthetized with isoflurane (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), a midline abdominal incision was made, and the portal pedicles to the left and median liver lobes (approximately 70% of the liver) were clamped with a non-traumatic microvascular clip for 60 min to induce partial hepatic ischemia. The clip was then removed to restore blood flow for 6, 24, or 48 h of reperfusion. At the end of reperfusion, serum and liver tissue samples were collected and stored at −80 °C or fixed.
2.3. Serum Biochemistry and Histopathology
Serum ALT and AST levels were detected using commercial ELISA kits strictly according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Liver tissues were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, embedded in paraffin, sectioned (5 μm thickness), and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E). The severity of liver tissue damage was observed under a light microscope by two pathologists blinded to the experimental groups and semi-quantitatively assessed according to the Suzuki scoring system. Scoring items included sinusoidal congestion, hepatocyte vacuolization, hepatocyte necrosis, and neutrophil infiltration, each scored from 0 to 4, with a total score ranging from 0 to 16.
2.4. Measurement of Oxidative Stress and Inflammatory Cytokines
After liver tissue homogenization, the content of malondialdehyde (MDA) and the activity of superoxide dismutase (SOD) were determined using the thiobarbituric acid method and the hydroxylamine method, respectively, according to kit instructions. Serum concentrations of tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) were measured using specific ELISA kits.
2.5. Flow Cytometry
Fresh liver tissue was digested with collagenase IV(Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) to prepare a single-cell suspension. Cells were blocked with anti-mouse CD16/32 antibody to block Fc receptors and then incubated with FITC-conjugated anti-mouse CD86 antibody and PE-conjugated anti-mouse CD206 antibody at 4 °C in the dark for 30 min. Detection was performed using a BD FACS Canto II flow cytometer(BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA), and data were analyzed using FlowJo V10 software. CD86-positive cells represented M1-type macrophages, and CD206-positive cells represented M2-type macrophages.
2.6. Quantitative Real-Time PCR (qPCR) and Western Blotting
Total RNA was extracted from liver tissue using the TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and High-Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Using β-actin as the internal reference, amplification was performed on a QuantStudio 5 real-time PCR system(Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) with the SYBR Green method(Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). The relative gene expression was calculated using the 2−ΔΔCt method. The primer sequences of the targeted genes are list as follows:
β-actin: AGAGGGAAATCGTGCGTGAC CAATAGTGATGACCTGGCCGT,
Arg-1: CTCCAAGCCAAAGTCCTTAGAG AGGAGCTGTCATTAGGGACATC,
IL-10: GCTCTTACTGACTGGCATGAG CGCAGCTCTAGGAGCATGTG,
iNOS: GTTCTCAGCCCAACAATACAAGA GTGGACGGGTCGATGTCAC,
IL-1β: GCAACTGTTCCTGAACTCAACT ATCTTTTGGGGTCCGTCAACT.
Total protein was extracted from the liver tissue or cells using RIPA lysis buffer (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). Equal amounts of protein were separated by SDS-PAGE and transferred to PVDF membranes (Merck Millipore, Burlington, MA, USA). After blocking with 5% non-fat milk, membranes were incubated with corresponding primary antibodies at 4 °C overnight, followed by incubation with HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies at room temperature for 1 h. Finally, signals were visualized using an ECL chemiluminescence kit (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) on an imaging system (Bio-Rad ChemiDoc XRS+, Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA).
2.7. Immunohistochemistry (IHC)
For analysis of NF-κB p65 nuclear translocation, immunohistochemistry was used. Paraffin sections underwent antigen retrieval, incubation with anti-NF-κB p65 primary antibody, followed by DAB (ZSGB-BIO, Beijing, China) development using the SP method (ZSGB-BIO, Beijing, China) and hematoxylin (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) counterstaining. Observations and photography were performed under an optical microscope to assess the subcellular localization of NF-κB p65.
2.8. Cell Culture and Hypoxia/Reoxygenation (H/R) Model
The mouse macrophage cell line RAW264.7 was purchased from the Chinese Academy of Sciences Cell Bank (Shanghai, China) and cultured in high-glucose DMEM (Gibco, Grand Island, NY, USA) supplemented with 10% FBS (Gibco, Grand Island, NY, USA). To simulate IRI, cells were placed in a tri-gas incubator (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) (94% N2, 5% CO2, 1% O2) for 6 h of hypoxia, then the medium was replaced with fresh medium for reoxygenation under normoxic conditions (95% air, 5% CO2) for 12 h. Experimental groups were: Control (Normoxia), H/R Model group (Vehicle), H/R + HCP (100 μg/mL) group, and H/R + HCP + TAK-242 (1 μM) group. TAK-242 was added 1 h before hypoxia. Cell viability was assessed using a CCK-8 kit (Dojindo Laboratories, Kumamoto, Japan). Levels of inflammatory cytokines and reactive oxygen species (ROS) in the cell supernatant were measured by ELISA and the DCFH-DA fluorescent probe method (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), respectively.
2.9. Molecular Docking
The crystal structure of the TLR4/MD-2 complex was obtained from the Protein Data Bank (PDB ID: 3FXI). The 3D structure of a potential active trisaccharide unit (rhamnose, galactose, glucuronic acid) of HCP was downloaded from the PubChem database or optimized using the Gaussian program. Molecular docking was performed using AutoDock Vina 1.1.2 software, and the docking results were visualized and analyzed for interactions using PyMOL 2.5.0 and LigPlot+ 2.2 software.
2.10. Statistical Analysis
All data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (Mean ± SD). Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism 9.0 software. Comparisons among multiple groups were performed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Levene’s test for homogeneity of variances. If variances were homogeneous, post hoc tests used Dunnett’s method (comparison with the Vehicle group) or Tukey’s method (pairwise comparison among all groups); if variances were not homogeneous, Welch’s ANOVA with Games-Howell post hoc test was used. p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
4. Discussion
Hepatic ischemia-reperfusion injury (HIRI) is a major challenge for the prognosis of liver surgery, and its complex pathological mechanisms make the development of prevention and treatment strategies difficult. This study systematically demonstrates for the first time that HCP, a polysaccharide component extracted from the traditional anti-inflammatory Chinese herb
Houttuynia cordata, significantly alleviates HIRI in mice. More importantly, we have elucidated its underlying molecular mechanism: HCP exerts hepatoprotective effects by directly targeting the TLR4 receptor, inhibiting its downstream NF-κB signaling pathway, thereby reprogramming liver macrophages from the pro-inflammatory M1 phenotype to the anti-inflammatory M2 phenotype, ultimately reducing inflammatory response and oxidative stress (
Figure 7). This finding not only provides solid pharmacological evidence for HCP as a potential natural hepatoprotective agent but also offers a new perspective for understanding the regulation of macrophage polarization in HIRI.
This study first verified the therapeutic efficacy of HCP at the whole-animal level. Our data show that HCP dose-dependently and significantly reduced serum ALT and AST levels and improved histopathological damage in HIRI mice (
Figure 1). This indicates that HCP effectively maintains hepatocyte membrane integrity and reduces parenchymal cell necrosis. Furthermore, a key feature of HIRI is the vicious cycle between oxidative stress and inflammation. We found that HCP treatment significantly reduced the lipid peroxidation product MDA in liver tissue and enhanced the activity of the key antioxidant enzyme SOD (
Figure 2A,B), while inhibiting the release of systemic inflammatory factors TNF-α and IL-6 (
Figure 2C,D). These results collectively indicate that HCP possesses dual antioxidant and anti-inflammatory pharmacological efficacies, laying a solid foundation for its action against the multiple injury mechanisms of HIRI.
In the inflammatory network of HIRI, liver-resident macrophages—Kupffer cells—play a central role. In recent years, the functional plasticity of macrophages, i.e., the M1/M2 polarization state, has been confirmed as crucial in determining the inflammatory process and tissue repair outcome. Our study is the first to link the protective effect of HCP with macrophage polarization. Flow cytometry results clearly showed that HCP treatment significantly increased the proportion of CD206+ M2-type macrophages while decreasing the proportion of CD86+ M1-type macrophages in liver tissue (
Figure 3A). At the gene and protein levels, HCP similarly downregulated M1 phenotype markers (iNOS, IL-1β) and upregulated M2 phenotype markers (Arg-1, IL-10) (
Figure 3B–E). This finding is crucial because it implies that HCP does not simply inhibit inflammation but actively and intelligently reprograms macrophages from “destroyers” to “repairers,” thereby reversing the inflammatory process at its source. This is consistent with reports that M2-related factors like IL-10 can inhibit M1 macrophage activity, suggesting that HCP may establish a negative feedback regulatory loop by inducing M2 polarization. Although our study focused on macrophages, HIRI involves a multicellular network including neutrophils, endothelial cells, and hepatocytes. The M2 macrophages induced by HCP may secrete IL-10 and TGF-β, which could dampen neutrophil activation and stabilize endothelial barriers, thereby indirectly mitigating tissue injury. Furthermore, hypoxia-inducible factors (HIFs), particularly HIF-1α, are stabilized during ischemia and can synergize with NF-κB to drive pro-inflammatory gene expression. By suppressing TLR4/NF-κB, HCP might indirectly attenuate HIF-1α-mediated inflammation, while potentially favoring the HIF-2α pathway associated with tissue repair—a hypothesis warranting future investigation.
To explore the upstream signals through which HCP regulates macrophage polarization, we focused on the TLR4/NF-κB pathway. This pathway is a recognized bridge connecting damage signals to inflammatory responses and can directly regulate the transcription of M1 polarization-related genes. Our experimental evidence strongly supports this hypothesis: at the protein level, HCP significantly inhibited the HIRI-induced increase in TLR4, MyD88, and phosphorylated NF-κB p65 levels (
Figure 4A); the nuclear translocation of NF-κB p65 observed via IHC was effectively blocked by HCP (
Figure 4B), which directly explains the suppression of downstream pro-inflammatory gene expression. How might TLR4 inhibition directly promote the M2 phenotype? TLR4/NF-κB signaling not only drives pro-inflammatory gene expression but also reinforces the metabolic reprogramming of macrophages toward aerobic glycolysis (the “Warburg effect”), which supports the M1 state. By dampening this pathway, HCP may alleviate the glycolytic flux and instead favor oxidative phosphorylation and fatty acid oxidation—metabolic programs characteristic of M2 polarization. Additionally, TLR4 suppression can downregulate IRF5 (a key M1-promoting transcription factor) while permitting activation of IRF4/STAT6, which are central to M2 differentiation. Future studies measuring real-time metabolic fluxes and IRF/STAT activity in HCP-treated macrophages will help clarify these mechanistic links. To establish the necessity, rather than mere correlation, of TLR4 in HCP’s action, we used the pharmacological inhibitor TAK-242 for reverse validation. In vivo experiments found that TAK-242 pretreatment almost completely blocked HCP’s protective effects on liver function and inflammation (
Figure 5). This “loss-of-function” experiment provides the strongest evidence for our hypothesis that “HCP acts through TLR4.”
To exclude interference from the complex in vivo environment and confirm the direct effect of HCP on macrophages, we established an in vitro H/R model. The experimental results were highly consistent with the in vivo findings: HCP directly improved macrophage survival under H/R conditions, inhibiting their secretion of inflammatory factors and ROS generation (
Figure 5A–C), and these effects were similarly reversed by TAK-242 (
Figure 5D). This conclusively proves that macrophages are one of the direct target cells of HCP, and TLR4 is the key molecule mediating its effects. Several limitations should be acknowledged. First, all experiments used a single, well-characterized batch of HCP (HCA4S1-enriched). Natural polysaccharides can vary in composition due to plant source, harvest time, and extraction methods. Future translational work should adopt standardized extraction protocols, chemical fingerprinting (e.g., HPGPC, monosaccharide profiling), and bioactivity assays (e.g., TLR4 reporter) to ensure batch-to-batch consistency. Second, detailed pharmacokinetic data for HCP are lacking—a common challenge for macromolecular polysaccharides. While literature suggests similar polysaccharides can persist in plasma and liver for 24–48 h after i.p. injection, future studies using fluorescently labeled HCP or advanced LC-MS methods are needed to define its absorption, distribution, and elimination. Third, our pre-treatment regimen supports prophylactic use, which is relevant for planned liver surgeries; whether HCP is effective when given after ischemia onset (therapeutic regimen) remains to be tested. Finally, molecular docking studies predicted high-affinity binding between HCP and the TLR4/MD-2 complex from a structural perspective (
Figure 7), providing theoretical support from structural biology for HCP as a direct TLR4 antagonist, perfectly explaining the findings from the aforementioned cell and animal experiments. This study predicted the binding of HCP to the TLR4/MD-2 complex through molecular docking. It is worth noting that the HCP used in this study mainly consists of the structurally defined HCA4S1. Its abundant negatively charged galacturonic acid residues and specific branched-chain structure may provide the molecular basis for interaction with the positively charged pocket of TLR4/MD-2. This provides a new example for the classical theory that “polysaccharides can exert immunomodulatory effects via pattern recognition receptors” and also suggests that the specific sugar chain conformation of HCA4S1 may be key to its TLR4 antagonistic effect.
This study has several limitations that also point to fruitful avenues for future research. First, while molecular docking and pharmacological inhibition with TAK-242 provide strong suggestive and functional evidence, respectively, the precise mechanism of interaction could be further solidified. Experimental validation of the predicted HCP-TLR4 binding using biophysical techniques (e.g., CETSA, SPR) and verification using macrophage-specific TLR4 knockout animals would more definitively confirm the direct target and exclude potential contributions of TLR4 in other cell types, such as hepatocytes or endothelial cells. Second, as a natural polysaccharide preparation, HCP’s composition presents specific challenges. Future work should aim to identify the specific oligosaccharide fragment or active domain responsible for its core immunomodulatory effects. Concurrently, because bioactivity can be influenced by factors like plant source and extraction methods, establishing standardized quality control protocols—including chemical fingerprinting and bioactivity assays—is crucial for ensuring batch-to-batch consistency and reproducibility. Third, the pharmacokinetic profile of HCP in vivo remains undefined, which is a common hurdle for macromolecular polysaccharide therapeutics; developing sensitive methods to track its absorption, distribution, and metabolism will be essential for translational development. Finally, to fully assess its clinical potential, future studies should explore the efficacy of HCP in more complex models, such as large animal liver transplantation, and evaluate critical practical aspects like its effectiveness when administered after reperfusion begins (therapeutic regimen) and its potential for combination therapy with other hepatoprotective agents.