3.2. Surgical Groups
Based on the different operation ranges, patients were categorized into three groups: those who underwent total thyroidectomy (
n = 121), unilateral lobectomy with isthmusectomy (
n = 50), or isthmusectomy/extended isthmusectomy alone (
n = 44) (
Table 2). No statistically significant differences were observed among the three groups regarding gender, age, or underlying thyroid diseases (
p > 0.05). There was a statistically significant discrepancy in BMI levels between patients in the total thyroidectomy group (total thyroidectomy: 24.83 ± 4.23; unilateral lobectomy with isthmusectomy: 23.83 ± 3.77; isthmusectomy/extended isthmusectomy: 22.77 ± 2.90,
p = 0.024). A statistically significant difference in preoperative TSH levels was observed among the three groups (total thyroidectomy: 2.57 (1.78–4.19); unilateral lobectomy with isthmusectomy: 1.97 (1.36–2.88); isthmusectomy/extended isthmusectomy: 1.78 (1.1–2.24)
p < 0.001). Furthermore, the PLR levels also differed significantly among at least two groups (total thyroidectomy: 100 (74.58–134.85); unilateral lobectomy with isthmusectomy: 106.56 (88.15–153.40); isthmusectomy/extended isthmusectomy: 123.53 (99.70–178.39);
p = 0.028). The distribution of the largest tumor diameter among the three groups showed a statistically significant discrepancy (
p < 0.001). Pairwise comparisons showed that the tumor diameter was significantly larger in the total thyroidectomy group compared to both the unilateral lobectomy with isthmusectomy group (
p < 0.001) and the isthmusectomy/extended isthmusectomy group (
p < 0.001). No significant difference was observed between the latter two groups (
p = 0.241). This pattern may reflect surgical preference bias, as patients presenting with larger tumor diameters on preoperative imaging (e.g., ultrasound or CT) are more likely to be recommended total thyroidectomy.
The chi-square test indicated significant differences in tumor multifocality among the three groups (
p = 0.020). Further subgroup analyses with pairwise comparisons showed that the unilateral lobectomy with isthmusectomy group had a significantly higher incidence of multifocality compared with the isthmusectomy/extended isthmusectomy group (
p = 0.022). In contrast, no significant differences were observed between the total thyroidectomy group and the other two groups (all
p > 0.05). It should be noted that the multifocality described in this study refers to pathological multifocality, which includes both multiple intraisthmic lesions and microcarcinomas located in the ipsilateral or contralateral thyroid lobe in addition to the primary isthmus tumor. These small lobar foci were generally not detected on preoperative ultrasound but were identified only upon postoperative histopathological examination. A significant difference in extrathyroidal extension was also identified among the three groups (
p = 0.008). Post hoc analysis indicated a higher incidence in the total thyroidectomy group relative to the unilateral lobectomy with isthmusectomy group (
p = 0.031) and the isthmusectomy/extended isthmusectomy group (
p = 0.006), whereas no significant difference was observed between the latter two groups (
p = 0.563). This discrepancy may be attributed to selection bias during surgical decision-making, as surgeons are more inclined to opt for total thyroidectomy when multifocality or extrathyroidal extension is present. The results of pairwise comparisons between groups are presented in
Table 3.
3.3. Perioperative Outcomes and Complications
We specifically compared three surgical approaches in terms of operative time, blood loss, and postoperative recovery. The median operative time was 140 (118–166) minutes in the total thyroidectomy group, 110 (79.5–138) minutes in the unilateral lobectomy with isthmusectomy group, and 91 (77–144.25) minutes in the isthmusectomy/extended isthmusectomy group, with a statistically significant difference among the three groups (p < 0.001). Post hoc pairwise comparisons revealed that the total thyroidectomy group had a significantly longer operative time compared to both the lobectomy with isthmusectomy group (p < 0.001) and the isthmusectomy/extended isthmusectomy group (p < 0.001). However, no statistically significant difference was observed between the latter two groups (p = 0.723). A significant intergroup difference was also noted in intraoperative blood loss (p < 0.001). No statistically significant difference was detected between the two lesser resection groups (p = 0.399). Likewise, statistically significant variations were observed in both length of postoperative hospitalization (p < 0.001) and postoperative drainage volume (p = 0.028) among the surgical approaches. Patients undergoing total thyroidectomy had a longer postoperative stay compared to those in the other two groups (p < 0.05), and also exhibited significantly greater drainage volume than the isthmusectomy/extended isthmusectomy group (p = 0.015).
We conducted a statistical analysis of common postoperative complications associated with thyroid surgery and found no statistically significant differences among the three groups in terms of temporary or permanent recurrent laryngeal nerve injury, permanent hypoparathyroidism, or chyle leakage (all p > 0.05). However, a significant difference was observed in the incidence of transient hypoparathyroidism (p < 0.001). Further pairwise comparisons revealed that the total thyroidectomy group had a significantly higher rate of transient hypoparathyroidism compared to the other two groups (p < 0.05), while no significant difference was detected between the unilateral lobectomy with isthmusectomy group and the isthmusectomy/extended isthmusectomy group (p = 0.618).
3.4. Perioperative Outcomes and Complications After PSM
Given the baseline differences among the three surgical groups in tumor diameter, ETE, and multifocality, PSM was performed to reduce confounding. Propensity scores were calculated using age, sex, BMI, maximum tumor diameter, multifocality, capsular invasion, extrathyroidal extension, recurrent laryngeal nerve invasion, and tracheal invasion as covariates. After 1:1 matching, the three groups were well balanced, with no statistically significant differences in baseline characteristics (all p > 0.05), indicating good matching quality.
A total of 130 patients were included in the analysis. As shown in
Table 4, significant differences persisted among the three groups in operative time (total thyroidectomy: 131.5 [110.75–149.50] min; unilateral lobectomy with isthmusectomy: 95.00 [76.75–130.25] min; isthmusectomy/extended isthmusectomy: 94.00 [66.25–136.00] min;
p < 0.001), intraoperative blood loss (30.00 [12.50–50.00] mL vs. 10.00 [10.00–20.00] mL vs. 10.00 [5.00–20.00] mL;
p < 0.001), and postoperative length of stay (4.00 [3.00–5.00] days vs. 2.00 [2.00–4.00] days vs. 3.00 [2.00–5.00] days;
p < 0.001). In contrast, postoperative drainage volume showed no significant differences among the groups (
p = 0.791). Pairwise comparisons demonstrated a stepwise increase in operative time and length of stay with expanding surgical extent (all
p < 0.05). Intraoperative blood loss was significantly higher in the total thyroidectomy group compared with the unilateral lobectomy with isthmusectomy group (
p = 0.028) and the isthmusectomy/extended isthmusectomy group (
p < 0.001), while no difference was observed between the latter two groups (
p = 0.056).
Regarding postoperative complications, the only variable that remained significantly different among the three groups was transient hypoparathyroidism (
p = 0.002). Pairwise analysis further showed that transient hypoparathyroidism was more common in the total thyroidectomy group compared with the unilateral lobectomy with isthmusectomy group (
p = 0.009) and the isthmusectomy/extended isthmusectomy group (
p < 0.001), whereas no difference was found between the two more conservative approaches (
p = 0.162) (
Table 5).
3.5. Tumor Recurrence and Survival
The median follow-up time for the entire cohort was 29 months (range: 15–49.5). The median follow-up durations for the three groups were 42 months (22–66) for the total thyroidectomy group, 23 months (12–31.75) for the unilateral lobectomy with isthmusectomy group, and 15.5 months (12–27) for the isthmusectomy/extended isthmusectomy group, respectively. Tumor recurrence was observed in only three patients (2.5%), all of whom belonged to the total thyroidectomy group. No tumor-related deaths occurred during the follow-up period. Consequently, no statistically significant difference in recurrence rates was observed among the three groups (
p = 0.307). After PSM, only one patient (1.8%) in the total thyroidectomy group experienced tumor recurrence, and no statistically significant differences in tumor recurrence were observed among the three groups (
p = 0.503) (
Table 4).
However, it is noteworthy that the total thyroidectomy group had a significantly longer follow-up period compared to the other two groups (
p < 0.001). Therefore, the Kaplan–Meier survival curve provides us with the cumulative proportion of recurrence-free survivors in the three groups. In this study, the recurrence-free survival curves based on the different surgical approaches showed no statistically significant difference (
p = 0.804) (
Figure 1).
3.6. Potential Risk Factors for Central Lymph Node Metastasis
We further categorized the 215 PTC patients into groups based on their lymph node metastasis status and compared their baseline characteristics, aiming to preliminarily explore the clinicopathological factors associated with central lymph node metastasis in PTC. As shown in
Table 6, patients with central lymph node metastasis had a significantly higher proportion of males (
p < 0.001), tumor multifocality (
p = 0.011), and capsular invasion (
p = 0.031) compared to those without central lymph node metastasis. We found that patients with central lymph node metastasis generally had larger tumor diameter (
p< 0.001), higher preoperative SII (
p = 0.04), NMPLR (
p < 0.001), and eosinophil absolute count (
p = 0.009) levels.
On the basis of the above, we included these factors in a univariate logistic regression analysis for exploratory purposes (
Table 7). To reduce verification bias related to differing extents of lymph node dissection, only 136 patients who underwent bilateral central lymph node dissection were included in the analysis. In the multivariable logistic regression, “different center” was specified as a clustering variable, and cluster-robust standard errors were used to account for within-center correlations. The results indicated that gender (OR = 3.856, 95% CI: 1.602–9.281,
p = 0.003), capsular invasion (OR = 3.627, 95% CI: 1.495–8.796,
p = 0.004), largest tumor diameter (OR = 1.081, 95% CI: 1.018–1.148,
p = 0.011), and absolute eosinophil count (OR = 1.611, 95% CI: 1.086–2.390,
p = 0.018) were significantly associated with central lymph node metastasis. However, tumor multifocality, SII, and NMPLR lost significance in the univariate logistic regression model (all
p > 0.05).
These significant variables were further incorporated into a multivariate logistic regression analysis, which confirmed that gender (OR = 4.405, 95%CI: 4.104–4.729,
p < 0.001), multifocality (OR = 2.498, 95%CI: 1.064–5.864,
p = 0.035), tumor diameter (OR = 1.096, 95%CI: 1.047–1.147,
p < 0.001), capsular invasion (OR = 2.666, 95%CI: 2.547–2.791,
p < 0.001), and absolute eosinophil count (OR = 1.381, 95%CI: 1.125–1.695,
p = 0.002) remained significant independent predictors of central lymph node metastasis in PTCI. (
Table 7).
Using a multivariable logistic regression model, we established a predictive model for central lymph node metastasis (CLNM), which demonstrated good discriminatory performance, with an AUC of 0.777 (
Figure 2). To enhance clinical interpretability, we further evaluated the model’s sensitivity and specificity across a range of predicted probability thresholds. A threshold of 0.50 provided the most balanced performance, yielding a sensitivity of 77.6%, a specificity of 65.5%, and a Youden index of 0.431, representing the optimal trade-off among the candidate cut-off values. Therefore, we selected 0.50 as the key clinical decision threshold for stratifying patients into high- and low-risk groups for CLNM (
Table 8).