Next Article in Journal
Comparative Analysis of Davidson and Glyoxal Fixatives on Autofluorescence and Immunolabeling in Medaka (Oryzias latipes) Tissues
Next Article in Special Issue
Role of Cytokines in Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Previous Article in Journal
Shear Wave Elastography for Distinguishing Cervical Lymph Node Malignancy: A Prospective, Observational Study
Previous Article in Special Issue
Preclinical Evidence of Curcuma longa Linn. as a Functional Food in the Management of Metabolic Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Rodent Studies
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Biomedicines
Volume 13
Issue 8
10.3390/biomedicines13082003
biomedicines-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Anti-Inflammatory and Immunomodulatory Effects of 2-(3-Acetyl-5-(4-Chlorophenyl)-2-Methyl-1H-Pyrrol-1-yl)-3-Phenylpropanoic Acid

by
Hristina Zlatanova-Tenisheva
1,* and
Stanislava Vladimirova
2
1
Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacology, Medical University of Plovdiv, 4002 Plovdiv, Bulgaria
2
Department of Organic Synthesis, University of Chemical Technology and Metallurgy, 1779 Sofia, Bulgaria
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biomedicines 2025, 13(8), 2003; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines13082003
Submission received: 23 July 2025 / Revised: 9 August 2025 / Accepted: 16 August 2025 / Published: 18 August 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Role of Cytokines in Health and Disease: 3rd Edition)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

Background: The pursuit of novel anti-inflammatory agents with enhanced efficacy and safety is crucial. Pyrrole-containing compounds, integral to many NSAIDs, exhibit promising anti-inflammatory properties. Compound 3f (2-(3-acetyl-5-(4-chlorophenyl)-2-methyl-1H-pyrrol-1-yl)-3-phenylpropanoic acid), a pyrrole derivative structurally inspired by the COX-2 selective inhibitor celecoxib, was evaluated for its anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory effects. Methods: Anti-inflammatory activity was assessed in a carrageenan-induced paw edema model in Wistar rats. Compound 3f was administered intraperitoneally at 10, 20, and 40 mg/kg, either as a single dose or daily for 14 days. Diclofenac (25 mg/kg) served as the reference. Edema volume was measured by plethysmometry. Systemic inflammation was induced by lipopolysaccharide (LPS), and serum levels of the pro-inflammatory cytokine TNF-α and anti-inflammatory cytokines IL-10 and TGF-β1 were quantified by ELISA following single and repeated administration of compound 3f. Results: Single-dose administration of compound 3f at 20 mg/kg significantly reduced paw edema at 2 h (p = 0.001). After 14 days, all tested doses significantly inhibited paw edema at all time points (p < 0.001). In the LPS-induced systemic inflammation model, repeated treatment with 40 mg/kg of compound 3f significantly decreased serum TNF-α (p = 0.032). TGF-β1 levels increased significantly after both single and repeated doses (p = 0.002 and p = 0.045, respectively), while IL-10 levels remained unaffected. Conclusions: Compound 3f exhibits potent anti-inflammatory activity, particularly after repeated dosing, reflected by reduced local edema and systemic TNF-α suppression. The marked elevation of TGF-β1 indicates a potential immunomodulatory mechanism, selectively modulating cytokine profiles without altering IL-10. These findings support compound 3f as a promising candidate for targeted anti-inflammatory therapy involving cytokine regulation.

1. Introduction

The development of new anti-inflammatory agents with improved safety, tolerability, and efficacy remains a priority in biomedical research [1]. Current pharmacotherapies, including nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), are often limited by adverse effects or incomplete resolution of inflammation, particularly in chronic conditions where cytokine dysregulation plays a pivotal role. One promising strategy in drug discovery involves structural modification of known pharmacophores to generate novel compounds with targeted activity and improved pharmacological profiles [1,2].
The pyrrole heterocycle is a privileged scaffold in medicinal chemistry, found in a wide array of pharmacologically active compounds, including antimicrobials, antineoplastics, and anti-inflammatory agents [3,4,5,6]. Classic and modern NSAIDs, such as ketorolac, tolmetin, and zomepirac, incorporate pyrrole-based structures and have demonstrated potent COX-inhibitory and anti-inflammatory properties [7,8,9]. Building upon this foundation, we synthesized a pyrrole-containing compound, 2-(3-acetyl-5-(4-chlorophenyl)-2-methyl-1H-pyrrol-1-yl)-3-phenylpropanoic acid (3f), using celecoxib—a selective COX-2 inhibitor—as a structural prototype. Compound 3f is part of a larger series of 19 synthesized derivatives designed to explore structure–activity relationships within this chemical class. The design strategy aimed to retain COX-2 selectivity while potentially introducing novel modulatory effects on inflammation-related pathways, particularly those involving cytokines.
Inflammation is a complex biological response to harmful stimuli, involving a tightly regulated interplay of lipid mediators, reactive oxygen species, and cytokines [10]. Pro-inflammatory cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) and interleukin-1 (IL-1) initiate and amplify the inflammatory cascade, inducing cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) expression, adhesion molecule synthesis, and acute-phase responses [11,12]. Anti-inflammatory and immunoregulatory cytokines, including interleukin-10 (IL-10) and transforming growth factor-beta 1 (TGF-β1), act to resolve inflammation and restore tissue homeostasis [13,14,15]. The balance between these cytokines is critical to determining the outcome of the inflammatory process, and dysregulation is implicated in a wide range of diseases, including rheumatoid arthritis, atherosclerosis, and inflammatory bowel disease [12,16,17].
In this context, targeting cytokine profiles offers a valuable therapeutic avenue beyond traditional prostaglandin inhibition. Several NSAIDs and COX-2 inhibitors have been shown to modulate cytokine production independently of their cyclooxygenase activity, often via inhibition of transcription factors such as NF-κB [18,19,20]. However, such effects are drug- and model-specific, and the cytokine-modulating potential of newer pyrrole-based derivatives remains largely unexplored.
In the present study, we evaluated the anti-inflammatory activity of pyrrole-based compound 3f in both acute and subacute inflammation models. We employed the carrageenan-induced paw edema model to assess local anti-inflammatory effects, and the lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced systemic inflammation model to investigate changes in key circulating cytokines—namely TNF-α, IL-10, and TGF-β1. These cytokines were selected based on their established roles in orchestrating immune responses and mediating the transition from inflammation to resolution. Our objective was to characterize not only the anti-edematous potential of compound 3f but also its capacity to modulate systemic cytokine levels after single and repeated administration.

2. Materials and Methods

All procedures were approved by the Animal Health and Welfare Directorate of the Bulgarian Food Safety Agency, following a positive opinion from the institutional Ethics Committee (Protocol No. 419/20 December 2024).

2.1. Reagents

The following reagents were used: diclofenac sodium (75 mg/3 mL ampoules, Hexal AG, Holzkirchen, Germany), 0.9% sodium chloride (Sopharma AD, Sofia, Bulgaria), lambda-carrageenan (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany), lipopolysaccharide (LPS) from Escherichia coli strain O55:B5 (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany), and compound 3f (2-(3-acetyl-5-(4-chlorophenyl)-2-methyl-1H-pyrrol-1-yl)-3-phenylpropanoic acid). All substances were dissolved in physiological saline and administered intraperitoneally, except carrageenan, which was injected subplantarly.
Compound 3f is a pyrrole derivative synthesized via the Paal–Knorr cyclization, with the synthetic route illustrated in Figure 1. Its chemical design, synthesis, and characterization have been described in detail previously by Vladimirova and Bijev [21]. Compound 3f was purified by recrystallization to a purity greater than 98%, as confirmed by HPLC analysis. Elemental analysis (calculated for C22H20ClNO3: C 69.20%, H 5.28%, N 3.67%; found: C 68.88%, H 5.12%, N 3.34%) and a sharp melting point (163–164 °C) were consistent with the proposed structure. The selection of doses (10, 20, and 40 mg/kg) was based on previous studies involving structurally related pyrrolic compounds. These doses were shown to be pharmacologically relevant and safe in acute oral toxicity tests. Using this established dosing range also facilitates comparison across the broader compound series and supports future quantitative structure–activity relationship (QSAR) analyses by maintaining consistency in pharmacological evaluations.

2.2. Experimental Animals

Male Wistar rats (n = 72), 6 weeks old, weighing 150 ± 20 g, were obtained from an accredited breeding facility. Animals were housed under standard laboratory conditions (12/12 h light/dark cycle, controlled temperature, ad libitum access to food and water) and randomly assigned to nine experimental groups (Table 1).

2.3. Evaluation of Anti-Inflammatory Activity

To evaluate the anti-inflammatory activity of compound 3f, paw edema was induced in two experimental settings: following a single dose or after 14 consecutive days of treatment. Baseline paw volume was measured using a plethysmometer (Ugo Basile, Italy), which quantifies paw swelling by detecting changes in volume through fluid displacement. Acute inflammation was induced via subplantar injection of 0.1 mL of 1% carrageenan in saline into the right hind paw. Immediately thereafter, animals received intraperitoneal injections of saline, diclofenac (25 mg/kg), or compound 3f (10, 20, or 40 mg/kg). Paw volume was recorded at 2, 3, and 4 h post-injection.
Edema was expressed as a percentage increase relative to baseline using the following formula:
Percentage of paw edema = (Vt − Vo)/Vo × 100
Where Vo is baseline paw volume, and Vt is volume at the indicated time point. Reduction in edema versus control was interpreted as an anti-inflammatory effect [22].

2.4. Cytokine Profiling in a LPS-Induced Inflammation Model

To evaluate the systemic anti-inflammatory effects of compound 3f, serum cytokine levels were measured in two experimental settings: following a single dose or after 14 consecutive days of treatment. Only the highest dose (40 mg/kg) was selected for repeated administration to limit animal use and because this dose demonstrated the strongest efficacy in the single-dose setting. Four hours prior to sacrifice, rats in the LPS groups received an intraperitoneal injection of LPS (250 µg/kg). Animals were then euthanized, and blood was collected for serum separation by clotting at 37 °C for 60 min, followed by centrifugation (3000 rpm, 10 min). Serum samples were stored for cytokine analysis [23].

ELISA-Based Cytokine Quantification

Serum concentrations of TNF-α (pro-inflammatory), IL-10, and TGF-β1 (anti-inflammatory) were determined using commercial ELISA kits (Platinum ELISA, eBioscience, San Diego, CA, USA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Serum dilutions were 1:2 for TNF-α and IL-10, and 1:500 for TGF-β1.
Each cytokine was captured on wells coated with specific monoclonal antibodies, followed by the addition of a peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody and chromogenic substrate. Optical density was measured at 450/620 nm using a TECAN plate reader. Cytokine concentrations (pg/mL) were interpolated from standard curves.
Assay characteristics:
  • TGF-β1: Sensitivity: 8 pg/mL; Intra-/inter-assay CV: <3.7%/<8.6%
  • IL-10: Sensitivity: 1.5 pg/mL; Intra-/inter-assay CV: <5%/<10%
  • TNF-α: Sensitivity: 11 pg/mL; Intra-/inter-assay CV: <5%/<10%

2.5. Statistical Analysis

Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics v24.0 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA). Normality was assessed via the Shapiro–Wilk test. For group comparisons, one-way ANOVA was used, followed by Tukey’s post hoc test (homogeneous variances) or Games–Howell test (heterogeneous variances). Results are presented as mean ± SEM. A p-value ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Anti-Inflammatory Effect of Compound 3f

The anti-inflammatory potential of compound 3f was evaluated using the carrageenan-induced paw edema model in rats, both after a single administration and following 14 days of repeated dosing. Diclofenac (25mg/kg b.w.) was used as the reference anti-inflammatory agent.

3.1.1. Single Administration

Following a single administration, diclofenac significantly reduced paw edema compared to the saline-treated control group at all three measured time points (2nd, 3rd, and 4th hours). Specifically, paw edema percentages in the diclofenac group were 21.9 ± 2.3%, 14.4 ± 2.9%, and 16.5 ± 3.0%, respectively, with all comparisons showing statistical significance (p < 0.05).
In contrast, compound 3f at 10 and 40 mg/kg b.w. did not produce significant edema reduction relative to the control at any time point. However, the 20 mg/kg dose of compound 3f significantly suppressed edema at the 2nd hour (p = 0.001) compared to the control; however, this effect was not sustained at the 3rd or 4th hours (Figure 2).

3.1.2. Repeated Administration (14 Days)

Following 14 consecutive days of treatment, diclofenac continued to demonstrate strong anti-inflammatory activity, with paw edema reduced to 14.5 ± 0.9%, 11.2 ± 1.4%, and 7.7 ± 1.3% at the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th hours, respectively (all p < 0.001 v.s. control).
Notably, compound 3f exhibited a marked improvement in anti-inflammatory efficacy after repeated dosing. All three tested doses—10, 20, and 40mg/kg b.w.—produced statistically significant reductions in paw edema compared to the control across all time points (p < 0.001) (Figure 3).
These findings indicate that compound 3f displays a time-dependent anti-inflammatory effect, with minimal efficacy after a single administration, but significant activity following repeated dosing. The enhanced response after 14 days suggests cumulative or adaptive mechanisms contributing to its anti-inflammatory action.

3.2. Effect of Compound 3f on Serum Levels of TNF-α, IL-10, and TGF-β1

The influence of compound 3f on systemic cytokine levels was assessed in a LPS-induced inflammation model, both after a single dose and following 14 days of repeated administration at a dose of 40 mg/kg body weight.

3.2.1. Single Administration

After a single administration of compound 3f, there was a noticeable, though not statistically significant, reduction in serum TNF-α levels (p = 0.064). While the decrease suggests a trend toward anti-inflammatory activity, it did not reach the threshold for significance.
In contrast, TGF-β1 levels increased significantly following a single dose of compound 3f (p = 0.002), indicating a potential immunomodulatory or tissue-protective effect.
Serum levels of IL-10, an anti-inflammatory cytokine, remained largely unchanged after a single administration, with 486 ± 108 pg/mL in the 3f-treated group compared to 494 ± 41 pg/mL in the control group (p = 0.950), suggesting no acute impact of compound 3f on this cytokine (Figure 4).

3.2.2. Repeated Administration (14 Days)

Prolonged treatment with compound 3f (40 mg/kg b.w.) over 14 days resulted in a statistically significant decrease in serum TNF-α levels (p = 0.032). This sustained suppression confirms the compound’s anti-inflammatory effect upon repeated exposure.
Similarly, TGF-β1 levels were significantly elevated in animals treated with compound 3f compared to controls (p = 0.045). This mirrors the trend observed after a single administration and reinforces the suggestion of a modulatory role for this compound in inflammation resolution or tissue remodeling.
In contrast, IL-10 levels remained unaffected, with mean concentrations of 359 ± 112 pg/mL in the 3f-treated group versus 399 ± 49 pg/mL in controls (p = 0.733), indicating that repeated administration of compound 3f does not significantly influence this cytokine’s expression (Figure 4).
These findings collectively suggest that compound 3f exhibits anti-inflammatory effects primarily through TNF-α suppression and TGF-β1 upregulation, particularly evident after prolonged exposure. The lack of effect on IL-10 levels indicates that the compound’s mechanism of action may be independent of this cytokine pathway.
Table 2 presents the precise numerical values for all statistically significant changes observed in paw edema and cytokine levels.

4. Discussion

Carrageenan-induced paw edema remains a well-validated experimental model for evaluating the anti-inflammatory potential of pharmacological agents. Initially described by Winter, this acute, non-immune inflammation model is characterized by a biphasic response: an early vascular phase dominated by mediators such as bradykinin, histamine, serotonin, and pro-inflammatory cytokines (e.g., TNF-α) [24], followed by a cellular phase where prostanoids and COX-2-mediated mechanisms predominate [25,26]. Importantly, the suppression of the second phase is considered a hallmark of NSAID activity, especially those with COX-2 inhibitory properties [27]. This model’s translational relevance stems from its ability to predict the clinical efficacy of anti-inflammatory agents, as the doses required to suppress edema in rodents closely approximate those effective in human therapy [28].
Numerous pyrrole-based compounds have previously shown anti-inflammatory activity in this model. Maddila et al. demonstrated that 1,3,4-thiadiazoles bearing a pyrrole nucleus significantly reduced carrageenan-induced inflammation [29]. Mohamed et al. reported pyrrole derivatives with activity comparable to ibuprofen [30], while Di Capua et al. designed fluorinated 1,5-diarylpyrrole ethers with in vivo efficacy [31]. Lavrentaki et al. synthesized eight N-substituted pyrrole-indazole hybrids, with two showing a notable reduction in edema [32]. Similarly, Pasha et al. developed aryl (4-aryl-1H-pyrrol-3-yl)(thiophen-2-yl) methanone analogues and identified compound PY5 as effective in suppressing inflammation in vivo [33]. Wang et al. designed 7H-pyrrolo [2,3-d]pyrimidine compounds, with compound N3b significantly attenuating both acute and chronic inflammation [34]. Together, these findings support the pyrrole scaffold as a privileged structure for anti-inflammatory drug development.
In our study, we evaluated compound 3f, a molecule structurally characterized as 2-(3-acetyl-5-(4-chlorophenyl)-2-methyl-1H-pyrrol-1-yl)-3-phenylpropanoic acid. This compound integrates multiple pharmacophores associated with anti-inflammatory activity: a pyrrole core, a 4-chlorophenyl substituent, a ketone (acetyl) group, a methyl group at position 2, and a propionic acid chain terminated with a phenyl ring. The chlorinated aromatic moiety may enhance lipophilicity and membrane permeability [35], while the phenyl ring is known to interact with a variety of biological targets, including enzymes and receptors involved in inflammation [2,36]. The propionic acid moiety mimics structures found in NSAIDs (e.g., ibuprofen), suggesting potential COX inhibition [37]. Moreover, the electron-withdrawing chlorine and carbonyl functionalities could affect binding affinity to enzymatic pockets or influence redox-sensitive pathways involved in cytokine modulation [38].
Compound 3f was evaluated for anti-inflammatory efficacy in the carrageenan-induced paw edema model, both after a single dose and following repeated administration over 14 days. As expected, the reference drug diclofenac, a relatively selective COX-2 inhibitor, significantly suppressed paw edema at all measured time points following a single dose. However, compound 3f did not exhibit comparable activity upon a single administration. A transient effect was observed only at the 20 mg/kg dose at the 2 h time point. These findings are consistent with previous literature on selective COX-2 inhibitors, such as celecoxib and rofecoxib, which display minimal acute anti-inflammatory activity but become effective after repeated administration [39]. This delayed efficacy may reflect a time-dependent accumulation or adaptive pharmacodynamic mechanism.
Strikingly, after 14 days of repeated dosing, all three tested doses of compound 3f (10, 20, and 40 mg/kg) produced significant reductions in carrageenan-induced paw edema, with inhibitory effects comparable to or surpassing those of diclofenac. These findings strongly suggest that compound 3f’s anti-inflammatory properties are cumulative and may involve stable or irreversible interactions with inflammatory targets, possibly via COX-2 modulation or cytokine pathway regulation. Furthermore, the similar degree of edema suppression across all three doses after prolonged administration suggests saturation of the target effect and potential nonlinear pharmacokinetics.
Given the increasing recognition of cytokines as pivotal mediators in inflammation and resolution, we further assessed the effects of compound 3f on serum levels of TNF-α, IL-10, and TGF-β1 in a LPS-induced systemic inflammation model. This model simulates systemic immune activation via Toll-like receptor 4 engagement on macrophages and dendritic cells, leading to a cascade of cytokine release (e.g., TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6), nitric oxide production via iNOS, and COX-2 activation [40,41].
Pyrrole derivatives have previously demonstrated anti-inflammatory efficacy in LPS models. Jung et al. reported that pyrrole-2,5-dione analogues suppressed NO and cytokine release in BV2 microglial cells [42]. Pandey et al. found several penta-substituted pyrrole–hydroxybutenolide hybrids to potently inhibit TNF-α in LPS-stimulated THP-1 monocytes [43]. Similarly, Paprocka et al. showed that pyrrole-2,5-dione compounds suppressed TNF-α and IL-6 in PBMCs [44], while Xu et al. isolated pyrrole alkaloids from Curvularia lunata that inhibited NO and IL-6 and promoted IL-10 secretion [45]. These findings highlight the capacity of pyrrole-based compounds to modulate both pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokine pathways.
Following a single dose of compound 3f (40 mg/kg), TNF-α levels were reduced by more than half compared to the LPS control group; however, this decrease did not reach statistical significance. This result indicates a potential trend toward TNF-α suppression, which became more pronounced upon repeated exposure. After 14 days of treatment, serum TNF-α levels were significantly reduced, confirming that compound 3f mediates anti-inflammatory effects through inhibition of this key pro-inflammatory cytokine. TNF-α plays a central role in orchestrating the inflammatory cascade by promoting the release of other cytokines such as IL-6 and IL-8, driving leukocyte recruitment, and activating transcription factors like NF-κB [46,47]. Therefore, the sustained suppression of TNF-α by compound 3f may underlie its therapeutic potential in chronic inflammatory states.
Interestingly, serum IL-10 levels remained unchanged after both single and repeated dosing. IL-10 is a potent anti-inflammatory cytokine that downregulates Th1 responses and inhibits monocyte/macrophage activation [47]. While some NSAIDs modulate IL-10 production [48], our findings suggest that compound 3f does not rely on this pathway, and its mechanism of action may be IL-10-independent. This further supports a selective modulation of the pro-inflammatory axis rather than a broad-spectrum immunosuppression.
Conversely, TGF-β1 levels were significantly elevated following both single and repeated administration of compound 3f. TGF-β1 is a pleiotropic cytokine with context-dependent effects, acting as both a suppressor of inflammatory responses and a regulator of tissue remodeling [49,50]. It inhibits the activation and proliferation of T and B lymphocytes and suppresses pro-inflammatory cytokine synthesis [51]. Its consistent upregulation in our study suggests a contributory role in the resolution of inflammation and possible tissue-protective effects associated with compound 3f. Importantly, TGF-β1 has been implicated in shifting the immune balance toward tolerance and regeneration, making its elevation particularly relevant in chronic or relapsing inflammatory conditions.
Comparable studies have shown that NSAIDs may exert cytokine-modulatory effects independent of prostaglandin inhibition [52]. For example, celecoxib has been reported to reduce levels of IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α in osteoarthritic tissues [53], while piroxicam has also been shown to reduce IL-1, IL-6, and TNF-α production in healthy human volunteers [54]. In a spinal cord injury model, meloxicam significantly reduced levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines, whereas methylprednisolone and diclofenac had limited impact on anti-inflammatory cytokines [55]. Similarly, aspirin and celecoxib reversed cytokine dysregulation in myocardial hypertrophy [56], and celecoxib has shown efficacy in TGF-β-driven disease states [57], likely through NF-κB inhibition [58]. However, the immunomodulatory effects of NSAIDs are variable and influenced by compound-specific properties.
Our findings position compound 3f as a promising anti-inflammatory candidate with a delayed but robust effect profile. Its efficacy appears to be driven by suppression of TNF-α and induction of TGF-β1, without significantly affecting IL-10. The lack of acute activity after single dosing but strong suppression after repeated administration may reflect the compound’s requirement for cumulative exposure to achieve effective cytokine modulation or intracellular signaling interference. Importantly, this study demonstrates that targeted cytokine modulation—specifically TNF-α inhibition combined with TGF-β1 upregulation—can be achieved with a small-molecule pyrrole derivative. Such a mechanism offers the potential for developing safer, more selective anti-inflammatory drugs compared to conventional NSAIDs, minimizing broad immunosuppression while promoting inflammation resolution. The differential cytokine modulation profile distinguishes compound 3f from traditional NSAIDs and supports further investigation into its potential as a selective immunomodulatory agent.
In conclusion, compound 3f exerts significant anti-inflammatory effects in both local (carrageenan) and systemic (LPS) models. These effects are associated with TNF-α inhibition and TGF-β1 upregulation after repeated administration, highlighting its potential utility in chronic inflammatory disorders where cytokine dysregulation plays a central pathogenic role. Further mechanistic studies are warranted to elucidate the precise molecular targets of compound 3f and its long-term safety profile.

5. Conclusions

Compound 3f demonstrated a delayed but significant anti-inflammatory effect, primarily evident after 14 days of administration. This effect was marked by a statistically significant reduction in serum TNF-α levels, a central pro-inflammatory cytokine. Notably, compound 3f did not alter IL-10 concentrations, indicating that its mechanism of action does not involve broad anti-inflammatory suppression via IL-10 pathways. In contrast, it significantly elevated serum TGF-β1 levels following both single and repeated dosing, suggesting an immunomodulatory role and possible promotion of inflammation resolution or tissue repair processes. These cytokine-specific effects—TNF-α inhibition and TGF-β1 upregulation—underscore the selective immune-modulating potential of compound 3f. Given the localized nature of the carrageenan-induced inflammation model versus the systemic impact reflected in serum cytokine levels, the need for prolonged administration may reflect the time-dependent establishment of systemic cytokine modulation. Overall, the findings support further investigation into compound 3f as a cytokine-targeted therapeutic candidate for chronic inflammatory diseases.

6. Limitations

This study has several limitations. First, the anti-inflammatory activity of compound 3f was evaluated exclusively in acute rodent models (carrageenan-induced paw edema and LPS-induced systemic inflammation), which may not fully replicate chronic or complex human inflammatory conditions. Second, only male Wistar rats were used, limiting the generalizability across sexes and species. Third, the mechanisms underlying the observed time-dependent effects remain speculative, as molecular targets and pharmacokinetics of compound 3f were not directly assessed. Fourth, cytokine profiling was limited to TNF-α, IL-10, and TGF-β1, excluding other relevant mediators that could further elucidate the compound’s immunomodulatory profile. Finally, while doses were selected based on related compounds and acute toxicity data, no detailed pharmacokinetic or dose-response studies were performed to optimize dosing regimens. Future research should address these gaps, including chronic inflammation models, sex-based differences, mechanistic studies, and comprehensive cytokine panels.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.Z.-T. and S.V.; formal analysis, H.Z.-T.; methodology, H.Z.-T.; resources, S.V.; investigation, H.Z.-T.; writing—original draft preparation, H.Z.-T.; writing—review and editing, S.V. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the European Union-NextGenerationEU, through the National Recovery and Resilience Plan of the Republic of Bulgaria, project No BG-RRP-2.004-0002, “BiOrgaMCT”.

Institutional Review Board Statement

All procedures were approved by the Animal Health and Welfare Directorate of the Bulgarian Food Safety Agency, following a positive opinion from the institutional Ethics Committee (Protocol No. 419/20 December 2024).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
NSAIDsNon-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs
COXCyclooxygenase
LPSLipopolysaccharide
TNF-αTumor necrosis factor alpha
IL-10Interleukin 10
TGF-β1Transforming growth factor beta 1
NF-κBNuclear factor kappa B
ELISAEnzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
HPLCHigh-performance liquid chromatography

References

  1. Bian, M.; Ma, Q.Q.; Wu, Y.; Du, H.H.; Guo-Hua, G. Small molecule compounds with good anti-inflammatory activity reported in the literature from 01/2009 to 05/2021: A review. J. Enzyme Inhib. Med. Chem. 2021, 36, 2139–2159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Chahal, S.; Rani, P.; Kiran; Sindhu, J.; Joshi, G.; Ganesan, A.; Kalyaanamoorthy, S.; Mayank; Kumar, P.; Singh, R.; et al. Design and development of COX-II inhibitors: Current scenario and future perspective. ACS Omega 2023, 8, 17446–17498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Sharma, S.; Kumar, D.; Singh, G.; Monga, V.; Kumar, B. Recent advancements in the development of heterocyclic anti-inflammatory agents. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2020, 200, 112438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Neha, K.; Wakode, S. Contemporary advances of cyclic molecules proposed for inflammation. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2021, 221, 113493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Jeelan Basha, N.; Basavarajaiah, S.M.; Shyamsunder, K. Therapeutic potential of pyrrole and pyrrolidine analogs: An update. Mol. Divers. 2022, 26, 2915–2937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Javid, H.; Saeedian Moghadam, E.; Farahmandfar, M.; Manouchehrabadi, M.; Amini, M.; Salimi, M.; Torkaman-Boutorabi, A. Biological activity of novel pyrrole derivatives as antioxidant agents against 6-OHDA induced neurotoxicity in PC12 cells. Iran J. Pharm. Res. 2023, 22, e140450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Reale, A.; Brogi, S.; Chelini, A.; Paolino, M.; Di Capua, A.; Giuliani, G.; Cappelli, A.; Giorgi, G.; Chemi, G.; Grillo, A.; et al. Synthesis, biological evaluation and molecular modeling of novel selective COX-2 inhibitors: Sulfide, sulfoxide, and sulfone derivatives of 1,5-diarylpyrrol-3-substituted scaffold. Bioorg Med. Chem. 2019, 27, 115045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Saletti, M.; Maramai, S.; Reale, A.; Paolino, M.; Brogi, S.; Di Capua, A.; Cappelli, A.; Giorgi, G.; D’AVino, D.; Rossi, A.; et al. Novel analgesic/anti-inflammatory agents: 1,5-Diarylpyrrole nitrooxyethyl sulfides and related compounds as cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors containing a nitric oxide donor moiety endowed with vasorelaxant properties. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2022, 241, 114615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Abdellatif, K.R.A.; Abdelall, E.K.A.; Labib, M.B.; Fadaly, W.A.A.; Zidan, T.H. Design, synthesis of celecoxib-tolmetin drug hybrids as selective and potent COX-2 inhibitors. Bioorg. Chem. 2019, 90, 103029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Almeer, R.S.; Hammad, S.F.; Leheta, O.F.; Abdel Moneim, A.E.; Amin, H.K. Anti-inflammatory and anti-hyperuricemic functions of two synthetic hybrid drugs with dual biological active sites. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 5635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Jang, D.-I.; Lee, A.-H.; Shin, H.-Y.; Song, H.-R.; Park, J.-H.; Kang, T.-B.; Lee, S.-R.; Yang, S.-H. The role of tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) in autoimmune disease and current TNF-α inhibitors in therapeutics. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 2719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Souza, R.F.; Caetano, M.A.F.; Magalhães, H.I.R.; Castelucci, P. Study of tumor necrosis factor receptor in the inflammatory bowel disease. World J. Gastroenterol. 2023, 29, 2733–2746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Moreau, J.M.; Velegraki, M.; Bolyard, C.; Rosenblum, M.D.; Li, Z. Transforming growth factor-β1 in regulatory T cell biology. Sci. Immunol. 2022, 7, eabi4613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Mishra, B.; Bachu, M.; Yuan, R.; Wingert, C.; Chaudhary, V.; Brauner, C.; Bell, R.; Ivashkiv, L.B. IL-10 targets IRF transcription factors to suppress IFN and inflammatory response genes by epigenetic mechanisms. Nat. Immunol. 2025, 26, 748–759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. York, A.G.; Skadow, M.H.; Oh, J.; Qu, R.; Zhou, Q.D.; Hsieh, W.-Y.; Mowel, W.K.; Brewer, J.R.; Kaffe, E.; Williams, K.J.; et al. IL-10 constrains sphingolipid metabolism to limit inflammation. Nature 2024, 627, 628–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Lee, B.W.; Moon, S.J. Inflammatory cytokines in psoriatic arthritis: Understanding pathogenesis and implications for treatment. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 11662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhao, Y.; Shao, C.; Zhou, H.; Yu, L.; Bao, Y.; Mao, Q.; Yang, J.; Wan, H. Salvianolic acid B inhibits atherosclerosis and TNF-α-induced inflammation by regulating NF-κB/NLRP3 signaling pathway. Phytomedicine 2023, 119, 155002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wang, Y.-F.; Feng, J.-Y.; Zhao, L.-N.; Zhao, M.; Wei, X.-F.; Geng, Y.; Yuan, H.-F.; Hou, C.-Y.; Zhang, H.-H.; Wang, G.-W.; et al. Aspirin triggers ferroptosis in hepatocellular carcinoma cells through restricting NF-κB p65-activated SLC7A11 transcription. Acta Pharmacol. Sin. 2023, 44, 1712–1724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sokołowska, P.; Bleibel, L.; Owczarek, J.; Wiktorowska-Owczarek, A. PPARγ, NF-κB and the UPR pathway as new molecular targets in the anti-inflammatory actions of NSAIDs: Novel applications in cancers and central nervous system diseases? Adv. Clin. Exp. Med. 2024, 33, 1007–1022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wang, Q.; Chen, Q.; Sui, J.; Tu, Y.; Guo, X.; Li, F. Celecoxib prevents tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α)-induced cellular senescence in human chondrocytes. Bioengineered 2021, 12, 12812–12820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Vladimirova, S.; Bijev, A. An access to new N-pyrrolylcarboxylic acids as potential COX-2 inhibitors via Paal-Knorr cyclization. Heterocycl. Commun. 2014, 20, 111–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Hassan, A.S.; Soliman, G.M. Rutin nanocrystals with enhanced anti-inflammatory activity: Preparation and ex vivo/in vivo evaluation in an inflammatory rat model. Pharmaceutics 2022, 14, 2727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Azambuja, J.H.; Mancuso, R.I.; Via, F.I.D.; Torello, C.O.; Saad, S.T.O. Protective effect of green tea and epigallocatechin-3-gallate in a LPS-induced systemic inflammation model. J. Nutr. Biochem. 2022, 101, 108920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Chaouch, A.C.; Benkaci-Ali, F.; Oukil, S.; Umar, H.I.; Ayoade, I.; Tata, S.; Belkadi, A. Chemical composition and kinetic study of Pinus resin volatile, investigation in its antibacterial, anti-inflammatory, anti-Alzheimer and insecticidal activities. Food Biosci. 2025, 68, 106653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Adel, I.; Jarrar, Q.; Ayoub, R.; Jilani, J.; Moshawih, S.; Al-Qadi, E.; Zihlif, M. The toxicity and therapeutic efficacy of mefenamic acid and its hydroxyethyl ester in mice: In vivo comparative study: A promising drug derivative. Jordan J. Pharm. Sci. 2022, 15, 507–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Morais, M.G.; Saldanha, A.A.; Mendes, I.C.; Rodrigues, J.P.C.; Azevedo, L.S.; Ferreira, L.M.; Amado, P.A.; Zanuncio, V.S.; Farias, K.S.; Silva, D.B.; et al. Antinociceptive and anti-inflammatory potential, and chemical characterization of the dichloromethane fraction of Solanum lycocarpum (Solanaceae) ripe fruits by LC-DAD-MS. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2024, 322, 117640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Burayk, S.; Oh-Hashi, K.; Kandeel, M. Drug discovery of new anti-inflammatory compounds by targeting cyclooxygenases. Pharmaceuticals 2022, 15, 282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Patil, K.R.; Mahajan, U.B.; Unger, B.S.; Goyal, S.N.; Belemkar, S.; Surana, S.J.; Ojha, S.; Patil, C.R. Animal models of inflammation for screening of anti-inflammatory drugs: Implications for the discovery and development of phytopharmaceuticals. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 4367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Maddila, S.; Gorle, S.; Sampath, C.; Lavanya, P. Synthesis and anti-inflammatory activity of some new 1,3,4-thiadiazoles containing pyrazole and pyrrole nucleus. J. Saudi Chem. Soc. 2012, 20, S306–S312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Mohamed, M.S.; Kamel, R.; Fatahala, S.S. Synthesis and biological evaluation of some thio containing pyrrolo [2,3-d]pyrimidine derivatives for their anti-inflammatory and anti-microbial activities. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2010, 45, 2994–3004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Di Capua, A.; Sticozzi, C.; Brogi, S.; Brindisi, M.; Cappelli, A.; Sautebin, L.; Rossi, A.; Pace, S.; Ghelardini, C.; Di Cesare Mannelli, L.; et al. Synthesis and biological evaluation of fluorinated 1,5-diarylpyrrole-3-alkoxyethyl ether derivatives as selective COX-2 inhibitors endowed with anti-inflammatory activity. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2016, 109, 99–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Lavrentaki, V.; Kousaxidis, A.; Theodosis-Nobelos, P.; Papagiouvannis, G.; Koutsopoulos, K.; Nicolaou, I. Design, synthesis, and pharmacological evaluation of indazole carboxamides of N-substituted pyrrole derivatives as soybean lipoxygenase inhibitors. Mol. Divers. 2024, 28, 3757–3782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Pasha, A.; Mondal, S.; Panigrahi, N. Synthesis of novel aryl (4-aryl-1H-pyrrol-3-yl) (thiophen-2-yl) methanone derivatives: Molecular modelling, in silico ADMET, anti-inflammatory and anti-ulcer activities. Antiinflamm. Antiallergy Agents Med. Chem. 2021, 20, 182–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Wang, W.; Qin, T.; Feng, X.; Xu, M.; Ling, Z.; Xie, X.; Zhang, M.; Huang, Y.; Luo, J.; Cao, S.; et al. Structural optimizations on the scaffold of 7H-pyrrolo [2,3-d]pyrimidine to develop potent iNOS inhibitors with improved antiarthritis activity in vivo. Arch. Pharm. 2025, 358, e70038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Schleiff, M.A.; Payakachat, S.; Schleiff, B.M.; Swamidass, S.J.; Boysen, G.; Miller, G.P. Impacts of diphenylamine NSAID halogenation on bioactivation risks. Toxicology 2021, 458, 152832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Cuesta, S.A.; Meneses, L. The role of organic small molecules in pain management. Molecules 2021, 26, 4029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Kaur, B.; Singh, P. Inflammation: Biochemistry, cellular targets, anti-inflammatory agents and challenges with special emphasis on cyclooxygenase-2. Bioorg. Chem. 2022, 121, 105663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Kalgutkar, A.S.; Daniels, J.S. Carboxylic acids and their bioisosteres. In Metabolism, Pharmacokinetics and Toxicity of Functional Groups: Impact of Chemical Building Blocks on ADMET; Smith, D.A., Ed.; Royal Society of Chemistry: Cambridge, UK, 2010; Volume 1, pp. 116–118. [Google Scholar]
  39. Lee, Y.; Kim, J.; Kim, W.; Yoon, I.S.; Jung, Y. Preparation and evaluation of amino acid conjugates of celecoxib as prodrugs to improve the pharmacokinetic and therapeutic properties of celecoxib. Pharmaceutics 2020, 12, 1043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Rodríguez-Castillo, A.J.; González-Chávez, S.A.; Portillo-Pantoja, I.; Cruz-Hermosillo, E.; Pacheco-Tena, C.; Chávez-Flores, D.; Delgado-Gardea, M.C.E.; Infante-Ramírez, R.; Ordaz-Ortiz, J.J.; Sánchez-Ramírez, B. Aqueous extracts of Rhus trilobata inhibit the lipopolysaccharide-induced inflammatory response in vitro and in vivo. Plants 2024, 13, 2840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Lim, J.S.; Bae, J.; Lee, S.; Lee, D.Y.; Yao, L.; Cho, N.; Bach, T.T.; Yun, N.; Park, S.-J.; Cho, Y.-C. In vitro anti-inflammatory effects of Symplocos sumuntia Buch.-Ham. Ex D. Don extract via blockage of the NF-κB/JNK signaling pathways in LPS-activated microglial cells. Plants 2022, 11, 3095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Jung, H.J.; Cho, D.-Y.; Han, J.-H.; Park, K.D.; Choi, D.-K.; Kim, E.; Yoon, S.-H.; Park, J.-Y. Synthesis of 1-(4-(dimethylamino)phenyl)-3,4-diphenyl-1H-pyrrole-2,5-dione analogues and their anti-inflammatory activities in lipopolysaccharide-induced BV2 cells. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2023, 92, 129408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Pandey, A.R.; Singh, S.P.; Joshi, P.; Srivastav, K.S.; Srivastava, S.; Yadav, K.; Chandra, R.; Bisen, A.C.; Agrawal, S.; Sanap, S.N.; et al. Design, synthesis and evaluation of novel pyrrole-hydroxybutenolide hybrids as promising antiplasmodial and anti-inflammatory agents. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2023, 254, 115340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Paprocka, R.; Pazderski, L.; Mazur, L.; Wiese-Szadkowska, M.; Kutkowska, J.; Nowak, M.; Helmin-Basa, A. Synthesis and structural study of amidrazone derived pyrrole-2,5-dione derivatives: Potential anti-inflammatory agents. Molecules 2022, 27, 2891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Xu, Q.; Qiao, Y.; Dai, C.; Pang, L.; Li, L.; Lu, Y. Discovery of anti-inflammatory pyrrole alkaloids from Curvularia lunata CL1. Fitoterapia 2025, 185, 106718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. de Brito, T.M.; Amendoeira, F.C.; de Oliveira, T.B.; Doro, L.H.; Garcia, E.B.; da Silva, N.M.F.; Chaves, A.d.S.; Muylaert, F.F.; Pádua, T.A.; Rosas, E.C.; et al. Anti-inflammatory activity and chemical analysis of different fractions from Solidago chilensis inflorescence. Oxid. Med. Cell Longev. 2021, 2021, 7612380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Liu, T.W.; Chen, C.M.; Chang, K.H. Biomarker of neuroinflammation in Parkinson’s disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 4148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Vingren, J.L.; Boyett, J.C.; Lee, E.C.; Levitt, D.E.; Luk, H.Y.; McDermott, B.P.; Munoz, C.X.; Ganio, M.S.; Armstrong, L.E.; Hill, D.W. A single dose of ibuprofen impacts IL-10 response to 164-km road cycling in the heat. Res. Q. Exerc. Sport. 2023, 94, 344–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Oladejo, B.O.; Adeboboye, C.F.; Adiji, P.I.; Adebolu, T.T. Cytokine-mediated immunoregulatory activity of Lactobacillus species in a carrageenan-induced acute inflammatory model. BioTechnologia 2023, 104, 53–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Abudukeyoumu, A.; Li, M.Q.; Xie, F. Transforming growth factor-β1 in intrauterine adhesion. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2020, 84, e13262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. de Streel, G.; Lucas, S. Targeting immunosuppression by TGF-β1 for cancer immunotherapy. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2021, 192, 114697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Houshmand, G.; Naghizadeh, B.; Ghorbanzadeh, B.; Ghafouri, Z.; Goudarzi, M.; Mansouri, M.T. Celecoxib inhibits acute edema and inflammatory biomarkers through peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ in rats. Iran J. Basic Med. Sci. 2020, 23, 1544–1550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Beekhuizen, M.; Tsuchida, A.I.; Saris, D.B.; Dhert, W.J.; Creemers, L.B.; van Osch, G.J. Celecoxib decreases the production of cytokines by osteoarthritic cartilage and synovium without affecting cartilage matrix degradation. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 2012, 20, S239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Beyer, I.; Njemini, R.; Bautmans, I.; Demanet, C.; Mets, T. Immunomodulatory effect of NSAID in geriatric patients with acute infection: Effects of piroxicam on chemokine/cytokine secretion patterns and levels of heat shock proteins. Cell Stress Chaperones. 2012, 17, 255–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Balachandran, S.K.; Iyer, K.; Senthil, S.A.; Ramalingam, A.P.; Venkatachalam, S. Evaluating the anti-inflammatory efficacy of steroids, COX-2 selective, and nonselective NSAIDs in contusion spinal cord injury: An experimental analysis. J. Pharm. Bioallied Sci. 2025, 17, S1877–S1881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Wei, M.; Lu, Z.; Zhang, H.; Fan, X.; Zhang, X.; Jiang, B.; Li, J.; Xue, M. Aspirin and celecoxib regulate Notch1/Hes1 pathway to prevent pressure overload-induced myocardial hypertrophy. Int. Heart J. 2024, 65, 475–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Shendi, S.S.; Selim, S.M.; Sharaf, S.A.; Gouda, M.A.; Sallam, H.M.; Sweed, D.M.; A Shafey, D. Anti-toxoplasmic effects of celecoxib alone and combined with spiramycin in experimental mice. Acta Trop. 2024, 260, 107448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Tajdari, M.; Peyrovinasab, A.; Bayanati, M.; Ismail Mahboubi Rabbani, M.; Abdolghaffari, A.H.; Zarghi, A. Dual COX-2/TNF-α inhibitors as promising anti-inflammatory and cancer chemopreventive agents: A review. Iran J. Pharm. Res. 2024, 23, e151312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Biomedicines 13 02003 g001
Figure 1. Procedure for synthesis of 2-(3-acetyl-5-(4-chlorophenyl)-2-methyl-1H-pyrrol-1-yl)-3-phenylpropanoic acid (3f).
Figure 1. Procedure for synthesis of 2-(3-acetyl-5-(4-chlorophenyl)-2-methyl-1H-pyrrol-1-yl)-3-phenylpropanoic acid (3f).
Biomedicines 13 02003 g001
Biomedicines 13 02003 g002
Figure 2. Comparison of edema percentage in the carrageenan-induced paw edema test between control group and groups treated with diclofenac and compound 3f at doses of 10, 20, and 40 mg/kg b.w. after single administration. * p < 0.05 compared to control; # p < 0.001 compared to control.
Figure 2. Comparison of edema percentage in the carrageenan-induced paw edema test between control group and groups treated with diclofenac and compound 3f at doses of 10, 20, and 40 mg/kg b.w. after single administration. * p < 0.05 compared to control; # p < 0.001 compared to control.
Biomedicines 13 02003 g002
Biomedicines 13 02003 g003
Figure 3. Comparison of edema percentage in the carrageenan-induced paw edema test between control group and groups treated with diclofenac and compound 3f at doses of 10, 20, and 40 mg/kg b.w. after repeated (14-day) administration. # p < 0.001 compared to control.
Figure 3. Comparison of edema percentage in the carrageenan-induced paw edema test between control group and groups treated with diclofenac and compound 3f at doses of 10, 20, and 40 mg/kg b.w. after repeated (14-day) administration. # p < 0.001 compared to control.
Biomedicines 13 02003 g003
Biomedicines 13 02003 g004
Figure 4. Comparison of serum cytokine levels in pg/mL in LPS-induced systemic inflammation between control group and groups treated with compound 3f in dose of 40 mg/kg b.w. * p < 0.05 compared to control.
Figure 4. Comparison of serum cytokine levels in pg/mL in LPS-induced systemic inflammation between control group and groups treated with compound 3f in dose of 40 mg/kg b.w. * p < 0.05 compared to control.
Biomedicines 13 02003 g004
Table 1. Experimental groups, treatment conditions, and test models.
Table 1. Experimental groups, treatment conditions, and test models.
GroupTreatmentPaw Edema ModelLPS-Induced Inflammation Modeln
1Saline (carrageenan control)Yes—single and repeated administrationNo8
2Saline (LPS single-dose control)NoYes—LPS administered on day of experiment8
3Saline (LPS repeated-dose control)NoYes—LPS administered on day of experiment after 14 days of saline treatment8
4Diclofenac 25 mg/kgYes—single and repeated administrationNo8
5Compound 3f 10 mg/kgYes—single and repeated administrationNo8
6Compound 3f 20 mg/kgYes—single and repeated administrationNo8
7Compound 3f 40 mg/kgYes—single and repeated administrationNo8
8Compound 3f 40 mg/kg (single administration) + LPSNoYes—LPS administered on day of experiment8
9Compound 3f 40 mg/kg (repeated administration) + LPSNoYes—LPS administered on day of experiment after 14 days of treatment8
Note: All doses expressed as mg/kg body weight. For LPS groups, LPS (250 µg/kg, i.p.) was administered 4 h prior to sacrifice on the day of cytokine measurement.
Table 2. Effects of compound 3f on paw edema percentages and serum cytokine levels in LPS-induced inflammation after single and repeated administration.
Table 2. Effects of compound 3f on paw edema percentages and serum cytokine levels in LPS-induced inflammation after single and repeated administration.
ParameterDose (mg/kg)Time (h)/
Measurement Point		Control (Mean ± SEM)Treated (Mean ± SEM)Significance (p)Administration
Paw Edema (%)20247.1 ± 4.125.0 ± 3.90.001Single dose
10245.8 ± 2.97.2 ± 2.3<0.001Repeated (14 days)
10340.5 ± 3.911.0 ± 4.2<0.001Repeated (14 days)
10441.0 ± 4.08.9 ± 4.1<0.001Repeated (14 days)
20245.8 ± 2.914.9 ± 2.6<0.001Repeated (14 days)
20340.5 ± 3.914.4 ± 1.6<0.001Repeated (14 days)
20441.0 ± 4.011.1 ± 3.3<0.001Repeated (14 days)
40245.8 ± 2.99.7 ± 2.2<0.001Repeated (14 days)
40340.5 ± 3.99.9 ± 2.6<0.001Repeated (14 days)
40441.0 ± 4.06.4 ± 1.9<0.001Repeated (14 days)
TNF-α (pg/mL)404 h post-LPS155 ± 3864 ± 140.064 (trend)Single dose
404 h post-LPS103 ± 2240 ± 70.032Repeated (14 days)
TGF-β1 (pg/mL)404 h post-LPS83 ± 13155 ± 100.002Single dose
404 h post-LPS78 ± 16119 ± 50.045Repeated (14 days)
Control values for paw edema represent measurements in saline-treated animals.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zlatanova-Tenisheva, H.; Vladimirova, S. Anti-Inflammatory and Immunomodulatory Effects of 2-(3-Acetyl-5-(4-Chlorophenyl)-2-Methyl-1H-Pyrrol-1-yl)-3-Phenylpropanoic Acid. Biomedicines 2025, 13, 2003. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines13082003

AMA Style

Zlatanova-Tenisheva H, Vladimirova S. Anti-Inflammatory and Immunomodulatory Effects of 2-(3-Acetyl-5-(4-Chlorophenyl)-2-Methyl-1H-Pyrrol-1-yl)-3-Phenylpropanoic Acid. Biomedicines. 2025; 13(8):2003. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines13082003

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zlatanova-Tenisheva, Hristina, and Stanislava Vladimirova. 2025. "Anti-Inflammatory and Immunomodulatory Effects of 2-(3-Acetyl-5-(4-Chlorophenyl)-2-Methyl-1H-Pyrrol-1-yl)-3-Phenylpropanoic Acid" Biomedicines 13, no. 8: 2003. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines13082003

APA Style

Zlatanova-Tenisheva, H., & Vladimirova, S. (2025). Anti-Inflammatory and Immunomodulatory Effects of 2-(3-Acetyl-5-(4-Chlorophenyl)-2-Methyl-1H-Pyrrol-1-yl)-3-Phenylpropanoic Acid. Biomedicines, 13(8), 2003. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines13082003

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop