Next Article in Journal
Effect of Mulberry Leaf and Its Active Component, 1-deoxynojirimycin, on Palmitic Acid-Induced Lipid Accumulation in HepG2 Cells
Previous Article in Journal
Exosome-Derived microRNAs as Liquid-Biopsy Biomarkers in Laryngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Narrative Review and Evidence Map
Previous Article in Special Issue
Branched-Chain Amino Acid Intake and Risk of Incident Type 2 Diabetes: Results from the SUN Cohort
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Systematic Review

Advances in Image-Based Diagnosis of Diabetic Foot Ulcers Using Deep Learning and Machine Learning: A Systematic Review

by
Haifa F. Alhasson
* and
Shuaa S. Alharbi
Department of Information Technology, College of Computer, Qassim University, Buraydah 52571, Saudi Arabia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biomedicines 2025, 13(12), 2928; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines13122928 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 2 November 2025 / Revised: 23 November 2025 / Accepted: 25 November 2025 / Published: 28 November 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Diabetes: Comorbidities, Therapeutics and Insights (3rd Edition))

Abstract

Background/Objectives: This review systematically assesses machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) applications using images to diagnose diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs), focusing on detection, segmentation, and classification. The study explores trends, challenges, and quality measurements of the reviewed research. Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted in October 2025 across 14 databases, covering studies published between 2010 and 2025. Studies employing ML/DL for DFU diagnosis with accurate measurements were included, while those without image-based methods, AI techniques, or relevant outcomes were excluded. Out of 4653 articles initially identified, 1016 underwent detailed review, and 102 met the inclusion criteria. Results: The analysis revealed that ML/DL models are effective tools for DFU diagnosis, achieving accuracy between 0.88 and 0.97, specificity between 0.85 and 0.95, and sensitivity between 0.89 and 0.95. Common methods included Support Vector Machines (SVMs) for ML and U-Net or fully convolutional neural networks (FCNNs) for DL. Recent studies also explored thermal infrared imaging as a promising diagnostic technique. However, only 45% of segmentation datasets and 67.3% of classification datasets were publicly accessible, limiting reproducibility and further development. Conclusions: This review provides valuable insights into trends and key findings in ML/DL applications for DFU diagnosis. It highlights the need for improved data availability and sharing to enhance reproducibility, accuracy, and reliability, ultimately improving patient care.
Keywords: diabetes mellitus; diabetic foot ulcers; dfu dataset; machine learning; deep learning; convolutional neural networks; thermogram diabetes mellitus; diabetic foot ulcers; dfu dataset; machine learning; deep learning; convolutional neural networks; thermogram

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Alhasson, H.F.; Alharbi, S.S. Advances in Image-Based Diagnosis of Diabetic Foot Ulcers Using Deep Learning and Machine Learning: A Systematic Review. Biomedicines 2025, 13, 2928. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines13122928

AMA Style

Alhasson HF, Alharbi SS. Advances in Image-Based Diagnosis of Diabetic Foot Ulcers Using Deep Learning and Machine Learning: A Systematic Review. Biomedicines. 2025; 13(12):2928. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines13122928

Chicago/Turabian Style

Alhasson, Haifa F., and Shuaa S. Alharbi. 2025. "Advances in Image-Based Diagnosis of Diabetic Foot Ulcers Using Deep Learning and Machine Learning: A Systematic Review" Biomedicines 13, no. 12: 2928. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines13122928

APA Style

Alhasson, H. F., & Alharbi, S. S. (2025). Advances in Image-Based Diagnosis of Diabetic Foot Ulcers Using Deep Learning and Machine Learning: A Systematic Review. Biomedicines, 13(12), 2928. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines13122928

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.
Back to TopTop