Next Article in Journal
Phenol-Soluble Modulin α3 Stimulates Autophagy in HaCaT Keratinocytes
Next Article in Special Issue
Cervical Sagittal Balance: Impact on Clinical Outcomes and Subsidence in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion
Previous Article in Journal
Diagnosis of Endometriosis Based on Comorbidities: A Machine Learning Approach
Previous Article in Special Issue
Potential Joint Protective and Anti-Inflammatory Effects of Integrin αvβ3 in IL-1β-Treated Chondrocytes Cells
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Biomedicines
Volume 11
Issue 11
10.3390/biomedicines11113017
biomedicines-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Ultraviolet Irradiation of Keratinocytes Induces Ectopic Expression of LINE-1 Retrotransposon Machinery and Leads to Cellular Senescence

by
Fadi Touma
1,2,
Marine Lambert
1,
Amelia Martínez Villarreal
1,
Jennifer Gantchev
1,
Brandon Ramchatesingh
1 and
Ivan V. Litvinov
1,3,*
1
Research Institute, McGill University Health Centre, McGill University, Montreal, QC H4A 3J1, Canada
2
Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3G 2M1, Canada
3
Department of Dermatology, McGill University, Montreal, QC H4A 3J1, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biomedicines 2023, 11(11), 3017; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11113017
Submission received: 27 September 2023 / Revised: 30 October 2023 / Accepted: 31 October 2023 / Published: 10 November 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Musculoskeletal Diseases: From Molecular Basis to Therapy (Volume II))
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Retrotransposons have played an important role in evolution through their transposable activity. The largest and the only currently active human group of mobile DNAs are the LINE-1 retrotransposons. The ectopic expression of LINE-1 has been correlated with genomic instability. Narrow-band ultraviolet B (NB-UVB) and broad-band ultraviolet B (BB-UVB) phototherapy is commonly used for the treatment of dermatological diseases. UVB exposure is carcinogenic and can lead, in keratinocytes, to genomic instability. We hypothesize that LINE-1 reactivation occurs at a high rate in response to UVB exposure on the skin, which significantly contributes to genomic instability and DNA damage leading to cellular senescence and photoaging. Immortalized N/TERT1 and HaCaT human keratinocyte cell lines were irradiated in vitro with either NB-UVB or BB-UVB. Using immunofluorescence and Western blotting, we confirmed UVB-induced protein expression of LINE-1. Using RT-qPCR, we measured the mRNA expression of LINE-1 and senescence markers that were upregulated after several NB-UVB exposures. Selected miRNAs that are known to bind LINE-1 mRNA were measured using RT-qPCR, and the expression of miR-16 was downregulated with UVB exposure. Our findings demonstrate that UVB irradiation induces LINE-1 reactivation and DNA damage in normal keratinocytes along with the associated upregulation of cellular senescence markers and change in miR-16 expression.

1. Introduction

Phototherapy using different forms of ultraviolet (UV) light is routinely used to treat numerous dermatologic conditions such as atopic dermatitis, psoriasis, and vitiligo. UV light covers the wavelengths 100–400 nm and can be classified, depending on the wavelength range, into UVA (315–400 nm), UVB-broad band (BB-UVB) (280–315 nm), UVB-narrow band (NB-UBV) (311–313 nm), and UVC (100–280 nm) [1,2,3]. While UV radiation below 290 nm is almost imperceptible at ground level due to the rare presence of stratospheric ozone, which absorbs the majority of radiation with wavelengths below 310 nm, it is essential to note that a portion of UVB radiation, which does reach us, can still be detrimental to unprotected living cells, primarily through DNA and protein damage [2,4,5]. UV radiation, particularly UVB, plays a pivotal role in regulating diverse homeostatic activities within the body. It acts as a trigger that influences not only the skin’s defense mechanisms but also its ability to restore cutaneous homeostasis, impacting the central nervous, endocrine, and immune systems in a highly coordinated manner [6]. In addition to initiating mechanisms related to maintaining skin integrity and overall homeostasis within the body, the absorption of UV radiation by the skin can lead to skin-related pathologies such as cancer, aging, and autoimmune reactions. It has been shown that UVB irradiation plays a role in autoimmunity through the induction of autoantibody production following the antigenic presentation of UV-stimulated viral and cellular proteins. The promoter-driven transcription of human endogenous retroviral sequences and the expression of those sequences, which are aberrantly activated in autoimmune diseases such as lupus erythematosus, were induced following the treatment of primary epidermal keratinocytes or HaCaT cells with UVB [7]. The current evidence suggests that UV treatments using UVA (especially in the presence of a psoralen) or BB-UVB induce cutaneous carcinogenesis resembling or at times exceeding sunlight exposure [8,9,10]. Phototherapy using UV is recognized as a carcinogen contributing to the development of basal cell carcinoma (BCC), cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC), melanoma, and Merkel cell carcinoma [11,12,13,14,15,16]. While UVA irradiation affects the deeper reticular dermal layers, UVB irradiation primarily affects the epidermis and papillary dermis [17,18]. UV irradiation of the skin leads to the generation of reactive oxygen species, direct DNA damage, induction of the p53 response, and inhibition of DNA synthesis. UVB-induced genomic instability occurs through a photochemical reaction which leads to the dimerization of cytosine and thymine pyrimidine bases and the formation of UV products, most commonly, cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers (CPDs) and pyrimidine (6-4) pyrimidone photoproducts (64PPs) [18,19,20,21,22]. These DNA photoproducts block transcription and are mutagenic, leading to skin cancer development [18,19,20,21,22]. However, recent evidence suggests that additional UV-induced mechanisms of genomic instability may be at play. Interestingly, solar and artificial UV exposure have been shown to cause reactivation of retrotransposons in the skin, contributing to genomic instability and carcinogenesis [23]. Nonetheless, the regulation and downstream effects of UV-induced retrotransposition in normal/non-transformed human keratinocytes remains poorly understood. If further investigated, retrotransposition can better our understanding of UV-induced cellular damage and help to mitigate UV-associated dermatologic diseases, including cellular senescence and photoaging.
Transposable elements, which played an important role in the evolution of the human genome, are DNA sequences that can move from one site to another within the genome and are further classified into transposons and retrotransposons [24,25,26]. While transposons excise and paste themselves from and into the genome, retrotransposons use RNA intermediates that are reverse-transcribed to be inserted into new sites within the genome [25]. Retrotransposons, which comprise ~40% of the mammalian genome, are also subdivided into two groups, i.e., long terminal repeat (LTR) retrotransposons and non-LTR retrotransposons, whereas human LTR elements are endogenous retroviruses. While transposons are inactive and LTR retrotransposons’ activity is very limited in the human genome, non-LTR retrotransposons are the only currently active elements in the human genome [27,28,29,30,31]. Non-LTR retrotransposons include long interspersed nuclear element (LINE)-1, Alu and SVA elements that comprise together about one-third of the human genome [32]. LINE-1 represents the largest, and the only autonomously active transposable element in the human genome. LINE-1 elements constitute 17% of the human genome and are ~6 kilobases in length [32]. LINE-1 consists of 5′ and 3′ untranslated regions (UTRs) containing an internal polymerase II bidirectional promoter and polyadenylation signal, respectively, and two open reading frames (ORF1 and ORF2) in between that encode ORF1p and ORF2p [33,34]. ORF1p (~40 kD) is an RNA-binding protein with chaperone activity, and ORF2p (~150 kD) has endonuclease and reverse-transcriptase activities. Together they enable a target-primed reverse transcription process of retrotransposition to insert their sequences into the genome [29,34,35,36,37,38]. A variety of genetic alterations such as gene insertions, deletions, and inversions have been shown to be induced by LINE-1 retrotransposons [39,40].
The molecular mechanism behind retrotransposon reactivation and downstream regulation remains poorly understood. The aberrant reactivation of LINE-1 in response to cellular stressors such as UV exposure or methylation changes in the cell has been linked to deleterious effects leading to DNA damage, cellular senescence, and photoaging [41,42]. There is only a limited set of regulatory RNAs and proteins that have been suggested to be linked to their regulation in model organisms of germ or somatic cells during different stages of ontogenesis. Examples of regulatory agents include P-element-induced wimpy testis (PIWI)-interacting RNAs (piRNAs), DNA methyltransferase 3 (DNMT3), germ cell tumor-specific factor 1 (GTSF1), and heat shock proteins [34,35,43,44,45,46]. The importance of miRNA signaling in human diseases has been documented, and many miRNA-based treatments have been developed such as the use of cobomarsen in dermatology to target miR-155 to treat skin lymphomas [47,48,49]. Although piRNAs have been shown to play an important role in LINE-1 regulation, their expression alone does not fully explain the dynamics of LINE-1 expression [50]. The expression of the purified U1 noncoding RNA (RNU1) has also been indicated to serve as an important sensor of UV damage [51]. However, this signaling event has not been directly linked to retrotransposon reactivation. Therefore, other small non-coding RNAs (sncRNAs) that are yet to be discovered may play an important role in LINE-1 reactivation.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Cell Cultures and Treatment Conditions

This study used two types of human keratinocyte cell lines: N/TERT1 cells (neonatal male) obtained from the laboratory of Dr. James Rhinewald at Harvard University [52,53] and HaCaT cells (62-year-old adult male) provided by Dr. Anie Philip’s lab at McGill University [54]. The HaCaT cells were grown in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM) (ATCC Cat# 30-2002, Manassas, VA, USA), while the N/TERT1 cells were grown in Defined Keratinocyte Serum-Free Medium (Thermo Fisher Scientific Gibco Cat# 10744019, Waltham, MA, USA). For UV irradiation, after 24 h of incubation, cells were washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) without Mg2+ and Ca2+, pH 7.5, and were irradiated at 50–70% confluency. Cells were treated with 15 mJ/cm2 of BB-UVB or 75 mJ/cm2 of NB-UVB radiations based on pilot experiments. Using a UVB handheld lamp (Dermfix 1000MX, Augsburg, Germany), BB-UVB irradiation was delivered with a fluorescent bulb emitting 280–315 nm wavelengths with a peak at 313 nm (Philips PL-S9W/12/2P twin bulb, Piła, Poland), whereas NB-UVB was delivered using a fluorescent bulb emitting a primary wavelength of 311 nm (Dermfix 9W UVB Narrowband twin bulb, Augsburg, Germany). The cells were subjected to one or more irradiations with either NB-UVB (75 mJ/cm2) or BB-UVB (15 mJ/cm2) in tissue culture-treated 6-well plates under 37 °C and 5% CO2.

2.2. Immunofluorescence

Immunofluorescence assays were performed in 4-well-chambered cell culture slides (Corning Falcon #354114, New York, NY, USA) following one or more UV irradiations at a 1-hour time point. The antibodies used included recombinant rabbit monoclonal antibody against LINE-1 ORF-1p (Abcam Cat# ab245249 (clone #EPR22227-6), Waltham, MA, USA, RRID: AB_2941773), 1:100 dilution in 1% BSA in PBS, and rabbit polyclonal antibody to γH2AX (phospho S139) (Abcam Cat# ab11174, Waltham, MA, USA, RRID: AB_297813), 1:1000 dilution in 1% BSA in PBS, and appropriate secondary antibodies, as detailed before [55], counterstained with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) nuclear marker (Thermo Fisher Scientific Invitrogen #D1306, Waltham, MA, USA, RRID: AB_2629482). Nuclear size and cell diameter measurements were obtained from individual counts of 50–70 N/TERT1 cells per UVB condition following 6 repeated UV irradiations with either BB-UVB or NB-UVB (24 h after treatment). Imaging was performed using an Etaluma Lumascope LS720 (Etaluma, Carlsbad, CA, USA) with a 60X objective (Meiji Techno, MA969, Campbell, CA, USA) and quantified using the immunofluorescence protocol of the QuPath open-source software (v0.3.2) [56].

2.3. Western Blotting

Protein extracts were obtained using the RIPA Lysis and Extraction Buffer (Thermo Fisher Scientific Cat# 89900, Waltham, MA, USA) from N/TERT1 cells after 6 repeated UV irradiations with either NB-UVB or BB-UVB 24 h after exposure. Western blotting was performed to measure the expression of ORF1p using a recombinant mouse monoclonal anti-LINE-1 ORF-1p antibody (Sigma-Aldrich Cat# 9Q01FP (clone #4H1), Millipore, Oakville, ON, Canada, RRID: AB_2941775), 1:1000 dilution in 1% BSA in PBS, with a loading control of a polyclonal anti GAPDH antibody (Thermo Fisher Scientific Cat# PA1-987, Waltham, MA, USA, RRID: AB_2107311), 1:2000 dilution in 1% BSA in PBS, and Clarity™ Western ECL Substrate (BioRad Cat# 1705060, Hercules, CA, USA).

2.4. RT-qPCR

For the mRNA analysis, 100,000 HaCaT or 300,000 N/TERT1 cells were lysed using QIAzol Lysis Reagent (Qiagen Cat# 79306, Germantown, MD, USA) following one or more UV exposures at different time points (1, 3, 6, and 24 h; after the last irradiation). Total RNA was extracted using an miRNeasy kit (Qiagen Cat# 217084). The extracted RNA was verified for quantity and yield using spectrophotometry (BioDrop DUO+ MBI Cat# 80-3006-68, Montreal, QC, Canada). RNA (1000 ng) was retrotranscribed to synthesize cDNA with an iScript™ Advanced cDNA Synthesis Kit (BioRad Cat# 1725037) for subsequent use in qPCR. qPCR was performed using SsoAdvanced Universal SYBR® Green Supermix (BioRad Cat# 1725274) to measure the relative mRNA expression of ORF2 of LINE-1, as well as senescence markers IFN-B, IL-6, IL-8, MMP1, and MMP3 to the β-actin housekeeping mRNA expression. The sequence of primers used in the RT-PCR is detailed in Table A1 (Thermo Fisher Scientific Invitrogen™ Cat# 10336022, Waltham, MA, USA). For the miRNA analysis, 300,000 N/TERT1 cells were lysed using QIAzol Lysis Reagent (Qiagen Cat# 79306) following repeated UV exposures at different time points (1, 3, 6, and 24 h; after the last irradiation). Total RNA was extracted, and miRNA-enriched fractions were separated from larger RNAs using an miRNeasy kit (Qiagen #217084). The extracted RNA was verified for quantity and yield using spectrophotometry (BioDrop DUO+ MBI Cat# 80-3006-68). miRNA-enriched RNA (50 ng) was retrotranscribed to synthesize cDNA using an miRCURY LNA RT Kit (Qiagen Cat# 339340) for subsequent use in qPCR. qPCR was performed using an miRCURY LNA miRNA PCR Assay (Qiagen Cat# 339306) to measure the relative miRNA expression of RNU1A1, hsa-miR-16-5p, hsa-miR-125b-1-3p, hsa-miR-138-5p, hsa-miR-22-5p, hsa-miR-197-3p, hsa-miR-487b-5p, and hsa-let-7a-5p, to the U6 snRNA expression. The GeneGlobe IDs are provided in Table A2.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

Ordinary one-way, mixed-effect model or Kruskal–Wallis nonparametric analysis was performed and corrected for multiple comparisons using Dunnett’s or Tukey’s test using GraphPad Prism version 10.0.2 for Mac, GraphPad Software, Boston, MA, USA, www.graphpad.com (accessed on 30 July 2023) (RRID: SCR_002798). The statistical analysis and correction tests were chosen with the help of the software depending on the type of generated data. Significance was defined as p < 0.05, and all experiments were performed in triplicates, with error bars representing the mean ± S.E.M.

3. Results

3.1. UV Irradiation Is Associated with DNA Damage and Impaired Proliferation

To quantify the impact of UV irradiation on the DNA of normal keratinocytes, we performed immunofluorescence for the DNA damage marker γH2AX in irradiated cells. The double-stranded DNA breaks (DSBs) marker γH2AX [57] was shown to be upregulated in N/TERT1 cells upon BB-UVB and NB-UVB repeated irradiation (Figure 1A). Three patterns of immunofluorescence staining for γH2AX were identified [55]. These patterns are correlated with the levels of DNA damage, where type 1 corresponds to low level of DNA damage (<10 γH2AX nuclear foci), type 2 corresponds to high level of DNA damage (>10 nuclear foci), and type 3 is indicative of pan-nuclear staining which is associated with a pre-apoptotic phenotype [58,59,60,61,62]. The extent of DNA damage varied, as indicated by the recruitment of γH2AX, according to the type of UV irradiation used. Both BB-UVB and NB-UVB irradiations resulted in increase in types 1–2 γH2AX staining.
Another robust marker of malignant transformation is nuclear enlargement which is a characteristic of cellular response to inflammation or injury [63]. N/TERT1 cells exposed to repeated irradiation of either BB-UVB or NB-UVB demonstrated an increase in nuclear size, which was similar for both types of irradiation (Figure 1B). Similarly, increased cell size is associated with decreased proliferative capacity and increased commitment to terminal differentiation [64]. Although an increase in the size of HaCaT cells was only observed at Day 2 following BB-UVB irradiation (Figure 2B), the proliferation of HaCaT keratinocytes was significantly impaired upon treatment with NB-UVB or BB-UVB (Figure 2A). In N/TERT1 cells, we observed an increased size and impaired proliferation (Figure A1). These results indicate that irradiating keratinocytes with BB-UVB or NB-UVB leads to increased recruitment of γH2AX (i.e., DSBs), nuclear enlargement, increased size, and decreased proliferation, as expected.

3.2. UV Irradiation Is Associated with LINE-1 Reactivation

UV irradiation leads to the upregulation of LINE-1 ORF1p and ORF2p protein expression, and its mRNA transcripts. In N/TERT1 as well as in HaCaT cells, repeated exposure to either BB-UVB or NB-UVB resulted in increased expression of ORF1p, as visualized by immunofluorescent staining (Figure 3A–D). Consistent with these findings, the Western Blotting analysis showed increased expression of ORF1p in N/TERT1 cells upon repeated irradiation with either BB-UVB or NB-UVB as compared to the unirradiated control cells (Figure 4A). For additional blots of LINE-1’s protein quantification, see Figures S1 and S2. To concomitantly evaluate the activation of LINE-1 at the mRNA level, we measured the ORF2p mRNA in N/TERT1 and HaCaT cells after repeated UV irradiations. The mRNA expression of LINE-1 ORF2p was robustly upregulated in N/TERT1 cells with either NB-UVB or BB-UVB. However, it was heterogeneously upregulated in HaCaT cells, whereas NB-UVB irradiation led to a significant increase, and BB-UVB irradiation resulted in a trend of increasing ORF2p mRNA as compared to the unirradiated control (Figure 4B,C). Furthermore, to better understand the timeline of LINE-1 reactivation, the expression of LINE-1 proteins in N/TERT1 cells was evaluated at different time points (1, 3, 6, 16, and 24 h) post-irradiation as compared to non-irradiated cells (0 h). Our immunofluorescence results show that the expression of LINE-1 proteins in N/TERT1 cells increases upon NB-UVB irradiation as compared to unirradiated cells starting at the 1-hour timepoint and remains high for 24 h (Figure 5A,B). The expression of LINE-1 proteins peaks between 1 and 3 h, and then gradually decreases afterwards. Therefore, our findings suggest that the irradiation of keratinocytes using BB-UVB or NB-UVB results in the reactivation of LINE-1 elements and the increased expression of its mRNA transcripts and proteins.

3.3. LINE-1 Reactivation and Cellular Senescence

To test the hypothesis of cellular senescence being associated with UV irradiation, we measured the mRNA expressions of senescence markers in N/TERT1 and HaCaT cells upon repeated UV irradiation. On one hand, the mRNA expression of senescence markers IFN-β, IL-6, IL-8, MMP1, and MMP3 was robustly upregulated upon either NB-UVB or BB-UVB repeated irradiation in N/TERT1 cells, compared to the non-irradiated controls (Figure 6A–E). However, NB-UVB irradiation had a slightly more potent effect in upregulating the mRNA expression of the senescence makers. On the other hand, the mRNA expression of the aforementioned senescence markers in HaCaT cells was heterogeneously upregulated upon repeated UVB irradiation. Whereas NB-UVB irradiation of HaCaT cells led to significant increase in the mRNA expression for all senescence markers tested as compared to the unirradiated control, BB-UVB irradiation resulted in a trend of increased expression (Figure 6F–J). Therefore, NB-UVB irradiation of HaCaT and N/TERT1 cells led to increased mRNA expression of senescence markers, whereas BB-UVB irradiation robustly upregulated the mRNA expression of senescence markers in N/TERT1 and less robustly in HaCaT cells. These results show that the UV treatment induces the upregulation of cellular senescence markers, but less robustly in p53-mutated, immortalized HaCaT cells.

3.4. LINE-1 Reactivation and Associated miRNAs Expression Changes

To investigate the RNA-based regulation of LINE-1 reactivation, we in silico identified overlapping miRNAs by comparing datasets of miRNAs deregulated during UV irradiation [65,66] with that of miRNAs that could target LINE-1 (using http://mirdb.org, accessed on 12 February 2023) (Figure 7A). Select shortlisted candidates including miRNAs known to be dysregulated upon UV irradiation and miRNAs that are known to target LINE-1 mRNA based on experimental assays were then evaluated in N/TERT1 cells for their expression changes in response to UV irradiation. We specifically tested miRNAs that bind different regions in the LINE-1 gene: hsa-let-7a-2-3p (miR-let7a afterwards) (5′UTR and IRES ORF); hsa-miR-487b-5p (miR-487 afterwards), hsa-miR-125b (miR-125 afterwards), hsa-miR-197 (miR-197 afterwards) (ORF1); hsa-miR-138-5p (miR-138 afterwards) (IRES ORF2); and hsa-miR-22-5p (miR-22 afterwards), hsa-miR-16-5p (miR-16 afterwards) (ORF2). Additionally, we evaluated the expression of RNU1 which was shown to be a DNA damage sensor [50].
Our results show that only miR-16 expression was significantly decreased in N/TERT1 cells upon repeated irradiation with either of the UVB treatments compared to the unirradiated control (Figure 7C). The expression of RNU1, miR-125 and miR-138 showed a decreasing trend following UVB treatments as compared with the control (Figure 7B,D,E). In contrast, the expression of miR-22, miR-197, miR-487 and miR-let7a did not change following 6 repeated UVB irradiations (Figure 7F–I).

4. Discussion

In this study, we demonstrate that LINE-1 reactivation occurs at a significant rate in response to UVB exposure, which triggers genomic instability/DNA damage and is associated with senescence/aging in normal (N/TERT1) and premalignant/p53-mutated (HaCaT) human keratinocytes. We also show that miRNAs miR-16, as well as, possibly, miR-125, miR-138 and RNU1 may play a role in the regulation of LINE-1 reactivation that is associated with UVB irradiation. Importantly, based on our findings LINE-1 activation may serve as a robust/sensitive marker of stress response to UV radiation in skin keratinocytes, which may represent an interesting biological assay to be used for testing sun filters/sunscreens. Also, LINE-1 regulatory pathways may be potentially targeted to prevent/modulate photoaging and carcinogenesis.
This work established that both BB-UVB and NB-UVB induce DNA damage in N/TERT1 cells [57,67]. These double-stranded breaks are the direct effect of the UVB-induced dimerization of pyrimidines and formation of UV products (CPDs, 64PPs) [20,68,69,70]. Moreover, a larger nuclear size was associated with repeated UV irradiations which represents a marker of cellular injury and apoptotic transformation [63]. Additionally, a decreased proliferation of N/TERT1 and HaCaT cells was observed following repeated irradiation with either BB-UVB or NB-UVB. Although UV-induced DNA damage has been shown in previous studies [21,71], we aimed to confirm the deleterious effects of UV on our cell lines given our experimental settings.
Then, we aimed to show that UVB exposure leads to the reactivation of LINE-1 retrotransposons in normal keratinocytes. We approached this aim using three methods: immunofluorescence, Western blotting and RT-qPCR. The methods we used measure the expression of ORF1 and ORF2, which are the most robust indicators of LINE-1 expression [72]. In addition, the immunofluorescence results provided us with insight into the cellular localization of the ORF1p, and the qRT-PCR provided a more robust measurement of LINE-1 mRNA targeting ORF2. Western blotting showed an increased expression of LINE-1 ORF1 protein following UV irradiation in N/TERT1 cells. Moreover, using immunofluorescence, we confirmed that early UV-induced LINE-1 ORF1 protein increased expression in N/TERT1 cells as early as 1 h after UV exposure. The ORF1 protein was localized in the cytoplasm and the nucleus of the cell, as expected, given the transposable activity of the protein. The mRNA expression of ORF2p was increased robustly in N/TERT1 following six UV irradiations of NB-UVB or BB-UVB. However, the increased LINE-1 mRNA expression in HaCaT cells was only observed following NB-UVB irradiation, whereas BB-UVB only resulted in a less robust increasing trend of expression. This increasing trend, although statistically insignificant, can be indicative of a degree of LINE-1 reactivation from a molecular point of view.
The observed difference between HaCaT and N/TERT1 cells could be explained by the immortalization process and transcriptional profile of these cell lines. The HaCaT cells are immortalized human adult trunk keratinocytes that were derived from a lesional skin in the distant periphery of a melanoma [54]. The transformation of HaCaT cells was propagated by different Ca2+ culture conditions and elevated temperature [54].
Importantly, HaCaT cells retain UV-indicative p53 mutations and chromosomal aberrations similar to those present in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma cells [54,73,74]. Therefore, HaCaT cells are often referred to as premalignant and represent an early stage of skin carcinogenesis with elevated telomerase activity and stable telomere length [73,75,76]. In contrast, the N/TERT1 immortalized keratinocyte cell line is generated from human neonatal foreskin primary keratinocytes by transducing them with the human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) gene and by the spontaneous loss of the pRB/p16INK4a cell cycle control mechanism [52,53]. The gene expression pattern in N/TERT1 cells is closer to normal keratinocytes when compared to that of HaCaT cells. The stress-induced premature senescence of N/TERT1 cells is triggered by nonspecific DNA damage and is not associated with telomere shortening due to the immortalization process that helps them maintain telomere length and prevent replicative senescence [77]. The telomerase activity in N/TERT1 cells protects them from stress-induced apoptosis and necrosis but not from senescence as it is not an effective DNA repair mechanism [77]. Therefore, HaCaT cells are more prone to undergo apoptosis in response to irradiation stress than N/TERT1 cells which are more resistant. Given that more N/TERT1 cells survive repeated UV irradiations, they are more likely to have increased activation of LINE-1 elements and upregulated senescence markers as compared with HaCaT cells.
To investigate whether UV irradiation leads to cell senescence, we measured the mRNA expression of multiple senescence markers including IFN-B, IL-6, IL8, MMP1 and MMP3 [78,79] following several UV exposures using qRT-PCR. The measured markers are part of the senescent-associated secretory phenotype, which could alter the microenvironment to promote inflammation and a consequent apoptotic transformation [80]. BB-UVB and NB-UVB light led to robust increase in mRNA expression for all senescence markers in N/TERT1 cells. However, these findings differed in HaCaT keratinocytes, where only NB-UVB led to robustly increased mRNA expression of senescence markers, whereas BB-UVB resulted in an increasing trend of senescence markers’ mRNA expression. These contrasting findings between N/TERT1 and HaCaT cells can be explained by the different immortalization techniques since HaCaT cells are more prone to apoptosis in response to repeated UV irradiations as opposed to N/TERT1 cells which are more likely to undergo stress-induced senescence [73,77]. Additionally, while NB-UVB and BB-UVB light lead to a similar inflammatory response, NB-UVB was shown to cause less DNA damage and apoptosis than BB-UVB in N/TERT1 keratinocytes and HaCaT cells for a given dose of irradiation [81,82]. Additionally, studies have demonstrated that NB-UVB is better tolerated in a clinical setting and results in fewer adverse effects [12,83]. Therefore, the lack of changes in senescence markers observed in HaCaT cells when treated with BB-UVB could be due to the predilection of HaCaT cells to undergo stress-induced apoptosis instead of senescence.
Finally, we observed a significant decrease in miR-16 expression in N/TERT1 cells following NB-UVB irradiations. MiR-16 has been shown to play a tumor suppressor role, and its loss or downregulation was associated with senescence and tumorigenesis, such as in cutaneous-T-cell lymphoma CTCL [84,85,86]. Moreover, miR-16 and miR-15a are clustered on chromosome 13 (13q14). This chromosomal region is known to be downregulated or deleted in B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia (B-CLL) [87]. A large proportion of B-CLL patients carry miR-16 genetic alterations which suggests an early contribution of the miR-16 loss to carcinogenesis [84]. miR-16 was also shown to serve as a biomarker for melanoma progression since the reduction in its serum levels was correlated with tumor thickness, ulceration, and stage [88,89]. Given that miR-16 is localized to LINE-1 ORF2, the observed robust reduction in its expression is suggestive of a putative regulatory role it may have over the UV-induced reactivation of LINE-1.

5. Limitations

One limitation of this study is the use of an immortalized keratinocyte cell lines, HaCaT and N/TERT1, as opposed to primary keratinocytes. Immortalized cell lines have a higher resistance to senescence induction compared to that of primary cells, which may affect the generalizability of the findings to primary cell models. This limitation should be considered when interpreting the results and may warrant further investigation in primary cell cultures for a more comprehensive understanding of the phenomenon. Additionally, it is important to note that some experiments, such as the proliferation assay, were conducted with relatively small sample sizes, which may introduce variability and limit the statistical robustness. Moreover, variations in sample sizes between the HaCaT and N/TERT1 cell lines could potentially influence the comparative analysis; and therefore, larger sample sizes and consistent cell numbers would be beneficial for future studies.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/biomedicines11113017/s1, Figure S1: Blots used for protein quantification using imageJ (v1.53k) and Western blot images (Figure 4A); Figure S2: Additional blots used for protein quantification using imageJ.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, I.V.L., M.L. and F.T.; methodology, I.V.L., M.L. and J.G.; validation, I.V.L., M.L. and F.T.; formal analysis, F.T. and M.L.; investigation, M.L., A.M.V., B.R., J.G. and F.T.; resources, I.V.L., M.L. and J.G.; data curation, A.M.V., B.R., J.G. and I.V.L.; writing—original draft preparation, F.T.; writing—review and editing, F.T., M.L., A.M.V., B.R., J.G. and I.V.L.; visualization, F.T.; supervision, I.V.L.; project administration, I.V.L.; funding acquisition, I.V.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by a Montreal Dermatology Research Institute (https://irdm.ca/en/) grant to I.V.L.; the Canadian Institutes for Health Research (CIHR) Project Scheme Grant #426655 to I.V.L.; the Cancer Research Society (CRS)-CIHR Partnership Grant #25343 to I.V.L., and by the Fonds de la recherche du Québec—Santé to Ivan V. Litvinov (#296643).

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Institutional Review Board of McGill University Health Centre (MUHC IRB 2022-8414, approved on 1 April 2022).

Informed Consent Statement

Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

All available data are presented in the current manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funder had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

Appendix A

Biomedicines 11 03017 g0a1
Figure A1. UV irradiation decreases cell proliferation and increases cell diameter. (A) The proliferation curve of N/TERT1 cells at 1, 2, 3, and 4 days following 6 UV irradiations with either NB-UVB or BB-UVB as compared to an unirradiated control sample. (B) Cell diameter of N/TERT1 or cells after 6 UV irradiations (50–70 cells/condition). The photos were taken on an Etaluma Lumascope LS720 microscope with a 60X objective (Meiji MA969) (scale bar 10 μm). Significance for N/TERT1 samples was calculated by a two-way ANOVA test and corrected for multiple comparisons using Dunnett’s test (both the day of measurement and the UV radiation were significant as compared with Day 1 and the control, respectively, p < 0.05).
Figure A1. UV irradiation decreases cell proliferation and increases cell diameter. (A) The proliferation curve of N/TERT1 cells at 1, 2, 3, and 4 days following 6 UV irradiations with either NB-UVB or BB-UVB as compared to an unirradiated control sample. (B) Cell diameter of N/TERT1 or cells after 6 UV irradiations (50–70 cells/condition). The photos were taken on an Etaluma Lumascope LS720 microscope with a 60X objective (Meiji MA969) (scale bar 10 μm). Significance for N/TERT1 samples was calculated by a two-way ANOVA test and corrected for multiple comparisons using Dunnett’s test (both the day of measurement and the UV radiation were significant as compared with Day 1 and the control, respectively, p < 0.05).
Biomedicines 11 03017 g0a1
Table A1. The primer sequences used in qPCR experiments for senescence markers and LINE-1.
Table A1. The primer sequences used in qPCR experiments for senescence markers and LINE-1.
Gene NamePrimer Sequence
ORF2FW-TCATAAAGCAAGTCCTCAGTGACC
RV-GGGGTGGAGAGTTCTGTAGATGTC
IFN-BFW-5′ACGCCGCATTGACCATCTAT-3′
RV-5′GTCTCATTCCAGCCAGTGCT-3′
MMP1FW-5′AGCCTTCCAACTCTGGAGTAATGT-3′
RV-5′CCGATGATCTCCCCTGACAA-3′
MMP3FW-5′CCCACCTTACATACAGGATTGTGA-3′
RV-5′CCCAGACTTTCAGAGCTTTCTCA-3′
IL-6FW-5′CACTGGCAGAAAACAACCTGAA-3′
RV 5′ACCAGGCAAGTCTCCTCATTGA-3′
IL-8FW-5′GTTTTTGAAGAGGGCTGAGAATTC-3′
RV- 5′CCCTACAACAGACCCACACAATAC-3′
β-actinFW- 5′CCAACCGCGAGAAGATGA-3′
RV- 5′CCAGAGGCGTACAGGGATAG-3′
Table A2. The GeneGlobe IDs of miRCURY LNA miRNA PCR assays.
Table A2. The GeneGlobe IDs of miRCURY LNA miRNA PCR assays.
miRmiRCURY LNA miRNA Custom PCR Assays
RNU1A1GeneGlobe ID- YP00203909 (Qiagen)
hsa-miR-16-5pGeneGlobe ID- YP00205702 (Qiagen)
hsa-miR-125b-1-3pGeneGlobe ID- YP00204400 (Qiagen)
hsa-miR-138-5pGeneGlobe ID- YP00206078 (Qiagen)
hsa-miR-22-5pGeneGlobe ID- YP00204255 (Qiagen)
hsa-miR-197-3pGeneGlobe ID- YP00204380 (Qiagen)
hsa-miR-487b-5pGeneGlobe ID- YP02115384 (Qiagen)
hsa-let-7a-5pGeneGlobe ID- YP00205727 (Qiagen)
U6 snRNAGeneGlobe ID- YP00203907 (Qiagen)

References

  1. Solano, F. Photoprotection and Skin Pigmentation: Melanin-Related Molecules and Some Other New Agents Obtained from Natural Sources. Molecules 2020, 25, 1537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. De Gruijl, F.R. [33] Photocarcinogenesis: UVA vs. UVB. In Methods in Enzymology; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2000; Volume 319, pp. 359–366. ISBN 978-0-12-182220-0. [Google Scholar]
  3. Myers, E.; Kheradmand, S.; Miller, R. An Update on Narrowband Ultraviolet B Therapy for the Treatment of Skin Diseases. Cureus 2021, 13, e19182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Enninga, I.C.; Groenendijk, R.T.; Filon, A.R.; van Zeeland, A.A.; Simons, J.W. The Wavelength Dependence of u.v.-Induced Pyrimidine Dimer Formation, Cell Killing and Mutation Induction in Human Diploid Skin Fibroblasts. Carcinogenesis 1986, 7, 1829–1836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kielbassa, C. Wavelength Dependence of Oxidative DNA Damage Induced by UV and Visible Light. Carcinogenesis 1997, 18, 811–816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Slominski, A.T.; Zmijewski, M.A.; Plonka, P.M.; Szaflarski, J.P.; Paus, R. How UV Light Touches the Brain and Endocrine System through Skin, and Why. Endocrinology 2018, 159, 1992–2007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Hohenadl, C.; Germaier, H.; Walchner, M.; Hagenhofer, M.; Herrmann, M.; Stürzl, M.; Kind, P.; Hehlmann, R.; Erfle, V.; Leib-Mösch, C. Transcriptional Activation of Endogenous Retroviral Sequences in Human Epidermal Keratinocytes by UVB Irradiation. J. Investig. Dermatol. 1999, 113, 587–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Pelin, E.D.; Akay, B.N.; Seçil, V.; Canan, A.; Tuğçe, E.Y.; Hatice, Ş. Risk of Skin Cancers in Mycosis Fungoides Patients Receiving PUVA Therapy: A Real-Life Experience from a Single Tertiary Center. Photodermatol. Photoimmunol. Photomed. 2023, 39, 428–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Matsumura, Y.; Ananthaswamy, H.N. Toxic Effects of Ultraviolet Radiation on the Skin. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2004, 195, 298–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Saladi, R.N.; Persaud, A.N. The Causes of Skin Cancer: A Comprehensive Review. Drugs Today 2005, 41, 37–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Butrón-Bris, B.; Daudén, E.; Rodríguez-Jiménez, P. Psoriasis Therapy and Skin Cancer: A Review. Life 2021, 11, 1109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Archier, E.; Devaux, S.; Castela, E.; Gallini, A.; Aubin, F.; Le Maître, M.; Aractingi, S.; Bachelez, H.; Cribier, B.; Joly, P.; et al. Carcinogenic Risks of Psoralen UV-A Therapy and Narrowband UV-B Therapy in Chronic Plaque Psoriasis: A Systematic Literature Review: Carcinogenic Risks of PUV-A Therapy and NB-UVB. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 2012, 26, 22–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Teng, Y.; Yu, Y.; Li, S.; Huang, Y.; Xu, D.; Tao, X.; Fan, Y. Ultraviolet Radiation and Basal Cell Carcinoma: An Environmental Perspective. Front. Public Health 2021, 9, 666528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Stern, R.S. The Risk of Squamous Cell and Basal Cell Cancer Associated with Psoralen and Ultraviolet A Therapy: A 30-Year Prospective Study. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2012, 66, 553–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Osmancevic, A.; Gillstedt, M.; Wennberg, A.-M.; Larkö, O. The Risk of Skin Cancer in Psoriasis Patients Treated with UVB Therapy. Acta Derm. Venereol. 2014, 94, 425–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Lin, T.-L.; Wu, C.-Y.; Chang, Y.-T.; Juan, C.-K.; Chen, C.-C.; Yu, S.-H.; Chen, Y.-J. Risk of Skin Cancer in Psoriasis Patients Receiving Long-Term Narrowband Ultraviolet Phototherapy: Results from a Taiwanese Population-Based Cohort Study. Photodermatol. Photoimmunol. Photomed. 2019, 35, 164–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ozawa, M.; Ferenczi, K.; Kikuchi, T.; Cardinale, I.; Austin, L.M.; Coven, T.R.; Burack, L.H.; Krueger, J.G. 312-Nanometer Ultraviolet B Light (Narrow-Band UVB) Induces Apoptosis of  T Cells within Psoriatic Lesions. J. Exp. Med. 1999, 189, 711–718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Bulat, V.; Situm, M.; Dediol, I.; Ljubicić, I.; Bradić, L. The Mechanisms of Action of Phototherapy in the Treatment of the Most Common Dermatoses. Coll. Antropol. 2011, 35 (Suppl. S2), 147–151. [Google Scholar]
  19. Situm, M.; Bulat, V.; Majcen, K.; Dzapo, A.; Jezovita, J. Benefits of Controlled Ultraviolet Radiation in the Treatment of Dermatological Diseases. Coll. Antropol. 2014, 38, 1249–1253. [Google Scholar]
  20. Pfeifer, G.P. Mechanisms of UV-Induced Mutations and Skin Cancer. Genome Instab. Dis. 2020, 1, 99–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Mullenders, L.H.F. Solar UV Damage to Cellular DNA: From Mechanisms to Biological Effects. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 2018, 17, 1842–1852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Cadet, J.; Douki, T. Formation of UV-Induced DNA Damage Contributing to Skin Cancer Development. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 2018, 17, 1816–1841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Banerjee, G.; Gupta, N.; Tiwari, J.; Raman, G. Ultraviolet-Induced Transformation of Keratinocytes: Possible Involvement of Long Interspersed Element-1 Reverse Transcriptase. Photoderm. Photoimm. Photomed. 2005, 21, 32–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Pace, J.K.; Feschotte, C. The Evolutionary History of Human DNA Transposons: Evidence for Intense Activity in the Primate Lineage. Genome Res. 2007, 17, 422–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Craig, N.L. (Ed.) Mobile DNA II; ASM Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2002; ISBN 978-1-55581-209-6. [Google Scholar]
  26. Cordaux, R.; Batzer, M.A. The Impact of Retrotransposons on Human Genome Evolution. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2009, 10, 691–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Kazazian, H.H.; Wong, C.; Youssoufian, H.; Scott, A.F.; Phillips, D.G.; Antonarakis, S.E. Haemophilia A Resulting from de Novo Insertion of L1 Sequences Represents a Novel Mechanism for Mutation in Man. Nature 1988, 332, 164–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Deininger, P.L.; Batzer, M.A. Alu Repeats and Human Disease. Mol. Genet. Metab. 1999, 67, 183–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Chen, J.-M.; Stenson, P.D.; Cooper, D.N.; Férec, C. A Systematic Analysis of LINE-1 Endonuclease-Dependent Retrotranspositional Events Causing Human Genetic Disease. Hum. Genet. 2005, 117, 411–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Callinan, P.A.; Batzer, M.A. Retrotransposable Elements and Human Disease. Genome Dyn. 2006, 1, 104–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Belancio, V.P.; Hedges, D.J.; Deininger, P. Mammalian Non-LTR Retrotransposons: For Better or Worse, in Sickness and in Health. Genome Res. 2008, 18, 343–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Lander, E.S.; Linton, L.M.; Birren, B.; Nusbaum, C.; Zody, M.C.; Baldwin, J.; Devon, K.; Dewar, K.; Doyle, M.; FitzHugh, W.; et al. Initial Sequencing and Analysis of the Human Genome. Nature 2001, 409, 860–921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Swergold, G.D. Identification, Characterization, and Cell Specificity of a Human LINE-1 Promoter. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1990, 10, 6718–6729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Babushok, D.V.; Kazazian, H.H. Progress in Understanding the Biology of the Human Mutagen LINE-1. Hum. Mutat. 2007, 28, 527–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Han, J.S.; Boeke, J.D. LINE-1 Retrotransposons: Modulators of Quantity and Quality of Mammalian Gene Expression? Bioessays 2005, 27, 775–784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Freeman, B.T.; Sokolowski, M.; Roy-Engel, A.M.; Smither, M.E.; Belancio, V.P. Identification of Charged Amino Acids Required for Nuclear Localization of Human L1 ORF1 Protein. Mob. DNA 2019, 10, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Mathias, S.L.; Scott, A.F.; Kazazian, H.H.; Boeke, J.D.; Gabriel, A. Reverse Transcriptase Encoded by a Human Transposable Element. Science 1991, 254, 1808–1810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Naufer, M.N.; Furano, A.V.; Williams, M.C. Protein-Nucleic Acid Interactions of LINE-1 ORF1p. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2019, 86, 140–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Symer, D.E.; Connelly, C.; Szak, S.T.; Caputo, E.M.; Cost, G.J.; Parmigiani, G.; Boeke, J.D. Human L1 Retrotransposition Is Associated with Genetic Instability in Vivo. Cell 2002, 110, 327–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Gilbert, N.; Lutz-Prigge, S.; Moran, J.V. Genomic Deletions Created upon LINE-1 Retrotransposition. Cell 2002, 110, 315–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Maxwell, P.H.; Burhans, W.C.; Curcio, M.J. Retrotransposition Is Associated with Genome Instability during Chronological Aging. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 20376–20381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Laurent, G.S.; Hammell, N.; McCaffrey, T.A. A LINE-1 Component to Human Aging: Do LINE Elements Exact a Longevity Cost for Evolutionary Advantage? Mech. Ageing Dev. 2010, 131, 299–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Ichiyanagi, T.; Ichiyanagi, K.; Ogawa, A.; Kuramochi-Miyagawa, S.; Nakano, T.; Chuma, S.; Sasaki, H.; Udono, H. HSP90α Plays an Important Role in piRNA Biogenesis and Retrotransposon Repression in Mouse. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014, 42, 11903–11911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Specchia, V.; Piacentini, L.; Tritto, P.; Fanti, L.; D’Alessandro, R.; Palumbo, G.; Pimpinelli, S.; Bozzetti, M.P. Hsp90 Prevents Phenotypic Variation by Suppressing the Mutagenic Activity of Transposons. Nature 2010, 463, 662–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Protasova, M.S.; Andreeva, T.V.; Rogaev, E.I. Factors Regulating the Activity of LINE1 Retrotransposons. Genes 2021, 12, 1562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Miousse, I.R.; Chalbot, M.-C.G.; Lumen, A.; Ferguson, A.; Kavouras, I.G.; Koturbash, I. Response of Transposable Elements to Environmental Stressors. Mutat. Res. Mol. Mech. Mutagen. 2015, 765, 19–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Gluud, M.; Willerslev-Olsen, A.; Gjerdrum, L.M.R.; Lindahl, L.M.; Buus, T.B.; Andersen, M.H.; Bonefeld, C.M.; Krejsgaard, T.; Litvinov, I.V.; Iversen, L.; et al. MicroRNAs in the Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, Prognosis and Targeted Treatment of Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphomas. Cancers 2020, 12, 1229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Querfeld, C.; Foss, F.M.; Kim, Y.H.; Pinter-Brown, L.; William, B.M.; Porcu, P.; Pacheco, T.; Haverkos, B.M.; DeSimone, J.; Guitart, J.; et al. Phase 1 Trial of Cobomarsen, an Inhibitor of Mir-155, in Cutaneous T Cell Lymphoma. Blood 2018, 132, 2903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Litvinov, I.V.; Pehr, K.; Sasseville, D. Connecting the Dots in Cutaneous T Cell Lymphoma (CTCL): STAT5 Regulates Malignant T Cell Proliferation via miR-155. Cell Cycle 2013, 12, 2172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Houwing, S.; Kamminga, L.M.; Berezikov, E.; Cronembold, D.; Girard, A.; van den Elst, H.; Filippov, D.V.; Blaser, H.; Raz, E.; Moens, C.B.; et al. A Role for Piwi and piRNAs in Germ Cell Maintenance and Transposon Silencing in Zebrafish. Cell 2007, 129, 69–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Bernard, J.J.; Cowing-Zitron, C.; Nakatsuji, T.; Muehleisen, B.; Muto, J.; Borkowski, A.W.; Martinez, L.; Greidinger, E.L.; Yu, B.D.; Gallo, R.L. Ultraviolet Radiation Damages Self Noncoding RNA and Is Detected by TLR3. Nat. Med. 2012, 18, 1286–1290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Smits, J.P.H.; Niehues, H.; Rikken, G.; van Vlijmen-Willems, I.M.J.J.; van de Zande, G.W.H.J.F.; Zeeuwen, P.L.J.M.; Schalkwijk, J.; van den Bogaard, E.H. Immortalized N/TERT Keratinocytes as an Alternative Cell Source in 3D Human Epidermal Models. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 11838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Dickson, M.A.; Hahn, W.C.; Ino, Y.; Ronfard, V.; Wu, J.Y.; Weinberg, R.A.; Louis, D.N.; Li, F.P.; Rheinwald, J.G. Human Keratinocytes That Express hTERT and Also Bypass a P16(INK4a)-Enforced Mechanism That Limits Life Span Become Immortal yet Retain Normal Growth and Differentiation Characteristics. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2000, 20, 1436–1447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Boukamp, P.; Petrussevska, R.T.; Breitkreutz, D.; Hornung, J.; Markham, A.; Fusenig, N.E. Normal Keratinization in a Spontaneously Immortalized Aneuploid Human Keratinocyte Cell Line. J. Cell Biol. 1988, 106, 761–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Gantchev, J.; Ramchatesingh, B.; Berman-Rosa, M.; Sikorski, D.; Raveendra, K.; Amar, L.; Xu, H.H.; Villarreal, A.M.; Ordaz, D.J.G.; Litvinov, I.V. Tools Used to Assay Genomic Instability in Cancers and Cancer Meiomitosis. J. Cell Commun. Signal. 2022, 16, 159–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Bankhead, P.; Loughrey, M.B.; Fernández, J.A.; Dombrowski, Y.; McArt, D.G.; Dunne, P.D.; McQuaid, S.; Gray, R.T.; Murray, L.J.; Coleman, H.G.; et al. QuPath: Open Source Software for Digital Pathology Image Analysis. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 16878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Dickey, J.S.; Redon, C.E.; Nakamura, A.J.; Baird, B.J.; Sedelnikova, O.A.; Bonner, W.M. H2AX: Functional Roles and Potential Applications. Chromosoma 2009, 118, 683–692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Solier, S.; Pommier, Y. The Apoptotic Ring: A Novel Entity with Phosphorylated Histones H2AX and H2B and Activated DNA Damage Response Kinases. Cell Cycle 2009, 8, 1853–1859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Marti, T.M.; Hefner, E.; Feeney, L.; Natale, V.; Cleaver, J.E. H2AX Phosphorylation within the G1 Phase after UV Irradiation Depends on Nucleotide Excision Repair and Not DNA Double-Strand Breaks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103, 9891–9896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Lu, T.; Zhang, Y.; Kidane, Y.; Feiveson, A.; Stodieck, L.; Karouia, F.; Ramesh, G.; Rohde, L.; Wu, H. Cellular Responses and Gene Expression Profile Changes Due to Bleomycin-Induced DNA Damage in Human Fibroblasts in Space. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0170358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Halicka, H.D.; Huang, X.; Traganos, F.; King, M.A.; Dai, W.; Darzynkiewicz, Z. Histone H2AX Phosphorylation after Cell Irradiation with UV-B: Relationship to Cell Cycle Phase and Induction of Apoptosis. Cell Cycle 2005, 4, 339–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Ding, D.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, J.; Zhang, X.; Gao, Y.; Yin, L.; Li, Q.; Li, J.; Chen, H. Induction and Inhibition of the Pan-Nuclear Gamma-H2AX Response in Resting Human Peripheral Blood Lymphocytes after X-Ray Irradiation. Cell Death Discov. 2016, 2, 16011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Fischer, E.G. Nuclear Morphology and the Biology of Cancer Cells. Acta Cytol. 2020, 64, 511–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Barrandon, Y.; Green, H. Cell Size as a Determinant of the Clone-Forming Ability of Human Keratinocytes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1985, 82, 5390–5394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Zhou, B.; Xu, Y.; Permatasari, F.; Liu, W.; Li, W.; Guo, X.; Huang, Q.; Guo, Z.; Luo, D. Characterization of the miRNA Profile in UVB-Irradiated Normal Human Keratinocytes. Exp. Dermatol. 2012, 21, 317–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Pothof, J.; Verkaik, N.S.; van IJcken, W.; Wiemer, E.A.C.; Ta, V.T.B.; van der Horst, G.T.J.; Jaspers, N.G.J.; van Gent, D.C.; Hoeijmakers, J.H.J.; Persengiev, S.P. MicroRNA-Mediated Gene Silencing Modulates the UV-Induced DNA-Damage Response. EMBO J. 2009, 28, 2090–2099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Kuo, L.J.; Yang, L.-X. Gamma-H2AX—A Novel Biomarker for DNA Double-Strand Breaks. In Vivo 2008, 22, 305–309. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  68. Beukers, R.; Eker, A.P.M.; Lohman, P.H.M. 50 Years Thymine Dimer. DNA Repair 2008, 7, 530–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Markovitsi, D. UV-Induced DNA Damage: The Role of Electronic Excited States. Photochem. Photobiol. 2016, 92, 45–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Pfeifer, G.P. Formation and Processing of UV Photoproducts: Effects of DNA Sequence and Chromatin Environment. Photochem. Photobiol. 1997, 65, 270–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Sinha, R.P.; Häder, D.P. UV-Induced DNA Damage and Repair: A Review. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 2002, 1, 225–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Sharma, R.; Rodić, N.; Burns, K.H.; Taylor, M.S. Immuno-Detection of Human LINE-1 Expression. Methods Mol. Biol. 2016, 1400, 261–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Pavez Lorie, E.; Stricker, N.; Plitta-Michalak, B.; Chen, I.-P.; Volkmer, B.; Greinert, R.; Jauch, A.; Boukamp, P.; Rapp, A. Characterisation of the Novel Spontaneously Immortalized and Invasively Growing Human Skin Keratinocyte Line HaSKpw. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 15196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Lehman, T.A.; Modali, R.; Boukamp, P.; Stanek, J.; Bennett, W.P.; Welsh, J.A.; Metcalf, R.A.; Stampfer, M.R.; Fusenig, N.; Rogan, E.M. P53 Mutations in Human Immortalized Epithelial Cell Lines. Carcinogenesis 1993, 14, 833–839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Miyata, Y.; Okada, K.; Fujimoto, A.; Hata, K.-I.; Kagami, H.; Tomita, Y.; Ueda, M. The Effect of the Long-Term Cultivation on Telomere Length and Morphology of Cultured Epidermis. J. Dermatol. Sci. 2004, 34, 221–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Härle-Bachor, C.; Boukamp, P. Telomerase Activity in the Regenerative Basal Layer of the Epidermis Inhuman Skin and in Immortal and Carcinoma-Derived Skin Keratinocytes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1996, 93, 6476–6481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Gorbunova, V.; Seluanov, A.; Pereira-Smith, O.M. Expression of Human Telomerase (hTERT) Does Not Prevent Stress-Induced Senescence in Normal Human Fibroblasts but Protects the Cells from Stress-Induced Apoptosis and Necrosis. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 38540–38549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Muñoz-Espín, D.; Serrano, M. Cellular Senescence: From Physiology to Pathology. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2014, 15, 482–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Shmulevich, R.; Krizhanovsky, V. Cell Senescence, DNA Damage, and Metabolism. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2021, 34, 324–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Coppé, J.-P.; Desprez, P.-Y.; Krtolica, A.; Campisi, J. The Senescence-Associated Secretory Phenotype: The Dark Side of Tumor Suppression. Annu. Rev. Pathol. 2010, 5, 99–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Tang, L.; Wu, W.; Fu, W.; Hu, Y. The Effects of Phototherapy and Melanocytes on Keratinocytes. Exp. Ther. Med. 2018, 15, 3459–3466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Aufiero, B.M.; Talwar, H.; Young, C.; Krishnan, M.; Hatfield, J.S.; Lee, H.K.; Wong, H.K.; Hamzavi, I.; Murakawa, G.J. Narrow-Band UVB Induces Apoptosis in Human Keratinocytes. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 2006, 82, 132–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Sapam, R.; Agrawal, S.; Dhali, T.K. Systemic PUVA vs. Narrowband UVB in the Treatment of Vitiligo: A Randomized Controlled Study. Int. J. Dermatol. 2012, 51, 1107–1115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Croce, C.M. Causes and Consequences of microRNA Dysregulation in Cancer. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2009, 10, 704–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Calin, G.A.; Sevignani, C.; Dumitru, C.D.; Hyslop, T.; Noch, E.; Yendamuri, S.; Shimizu, M.; Rattan, S.; Bullrich, F.; Negrini, M.; et al. Human microRNA Genes Are Frequently Located at Fragile Sites and Genomic Regions Involved in Cancers. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101, 2999–3004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Lu, J.; Getz, G.; Miska, E.A.; Alvarez-Saavedra, E.; Lamb, J.; Peck, D.; Sweet-Cordero, A.; Ebert, B.L.; Mak, R.H.; Ferrando, A.A.; et al. MicroRNA Expression Profiles Classify Human Cancers. Nature 2005, 435, 834–838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Döhner, H.; Stilgenbauer, S.; Benner, A.; Leupolt, E.; Kröber, A.; Bullinger, L.; Döhner, K.; Bentz, M.; Lichter, P. Genomic Aberrations and Survival in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia. N. Engl. J. Med. 2000, 343, 1910–1916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Guo, S.; Guo, W.; Li, S.; Dai, W.; Zhang, N.; Zhao, T.; Wang, H.; Ma, J.; Yi, X.; Ge, R.; et al. Serum miR-16: A Potential Biomarker for Predicting Melanoma Prognosis. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2016, 136, 985–993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Neagu, M.; Constantin, C.; Cretoiu, S.M.; Zurac, S. miRNAs in the Diagnosis and Prognosis of Skin Cancer. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2020, 8, 71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Biomedicines 11 03017 g001
Figure 1. UV irradiation induces DNA damage. (A) The expression of γH2AX (green) in N/TERT1 keratinocytes as shown by immunofluorescence staining following 24 h of UV irradiation with either NB-UVB or BB-UVB as compared to unirradiated control samples (n = 3 with 500 cells/condition). The three patterns of γH2AX staining correspond to the number of double-stranded DNA breaks, i.e., type 1 expression <10 nuclear foci (low-level DNA damage), type 2 expression >10 nuclear foci (high-level DNA damage), and type 3 pan-nuclear expression (pre-apoptotic state). The photos were taken on an Etaluma Lumascope LS720 microscope with a 60X objective (Meiji MA969) (scale bar 10 μm). Significance was calculated using a mixed-effects model to analyze the data, and for multiple comparisons correction, Dunnett’s test was applied. (B) Nuclear size counts of NTERT cells after 6 UV irradiations (n = 3 with 50–69 cells/condition). Significance was calculated using the one-way ANOVA test and was corrected for multiple comparisons using Dunnett’s test. (**** p value < 0.0001, ** p value < 0.0021, * p value < 0.05).
Figure 1. UV irradiation induces DNA damage. (A) The expression of γH2AX (green) in N/TERT1 keratinocytes as shown by immunofluorescence staining following 24 h of UV irradiation with either NB-UVB or BB-UVB as compared to unirradiated control samples (n = 3 with 500 cells/condition). The three patterns of γH2AX staining correspond to the number of double-stranded DNA breaks, i.e., type 1 expression <10 nuclear foci (low-level DNA damage), type 2 expression >10 nuclear foci (high-level DNA damage), and type 3 pan-nuclear expression (pre-apoptotic state). The photos were taken on an Etaluma Lumascope LS720 microscope with a 60X objective (Meiji MA969) (scale bar 10 μm). Significance was calculated using a mixed-effects model to analyze the data, and for multiple comparisons correction, Dunnett’s test was applied. (B) Nuclear size counts of NTERT cells after 6 UV irradiations (n = 3 with 50–69 cells/condition). Significance was calculated using the one-way ANOVA test and was corrected for multiple comparisons using Dunnett’s test. (**** p value < 0.0001, ** p value < 0.0021, * p value < 0.05).
Biomedicines 11 03017 g001
Biomedicines 11 03017 g002
Figure 2. UV irradiation decreases cell proliferation and increases cell diameter. (A) The proliferation curve of HaCaT (n = 3) cells at 1, 2, 3, and 4 days following 6 UV irradiations with either NB-UVB or BB-UVB as compared to unirradiated control samples. (B) Cell diameter of HaCaT (n = 3) cells after 6 UV irradiations (50–70 cells/condition). The photos were taken on an Etaluma Lumascope LS720 microscope with a 60X objective (Meiji MA969) (scale bar 10 μm). Significance was calculated using a mixed-effects model to analyze the data, and for multiple comparisons correction, Tukey’s test was performed. (**** p value < 0.0001, ** p value < 0.0021, * p value < 0.05).
Figure 2. UV irradiation decreases cell proliferation and increases cell diameter. (A) The proliferation curve of HaCaT (n = 3) cells at 1, 2, 3, and 4 days following 6 UV irradiations with either NB-UVB or BB-UVB as compared to unirradiated control samples. (B) Cell diameter of HaCaT (n = 3) cells after 6 UV irradiations (50–70 cells/condition). The photos were taken on an Etaluma Lumascope LS720 microscope with a 60X objective (Meiji MA969) (scale bar 10 μm). Significance was calculated using a mixed-effects model to analyze the data, and for multiple comparisons correction, Tukey’s test was performed. (**** p value < 0.0001, ** p value < 0.0021, * p value < 0.05).
Biomedicines 11 03017 g002
Biomedicines 11 03017 g003
Figure 3. LINE-1 protein expression on HaCaT and N/TERT1 cells after 6 UV exposures with immunofluorescence. The expression of ORF1 proteins of LINE1 elements (red) as counterstained by DAPI (blue) in HaCaT (A,B) and N/TERT1 (C,D) keratinocytes as shown by immunofluorescence staining after 24 h of 6 UV irradiations with either NB-UVB or BB-UVB as compared to unirradiated control samples. The photos were taken on an Etaluma Lumascope LS720 microscope with a 60X objective (Meiji MA969) (scale bar 20 μm). Significance was calculated by a one-way ANOVA test and was corrected for multiple comparisons using Dunnett’s test. (*** p value < 0.0002, ** p value < 0.0021).
Figure 3. LINE-1 protein expression on HaCaT and N/TERT1 cells after 6 UV exposures with immunofluorescence. The expression of ORF1 proteins of LINE1 elements (red) as counterstained by DAPI (blue) in HaCaT (A,B) and N/TERT1 (C,D) keratinocytes as shown by immunofluorescence staining after 24 h of 6 UV irradiations with either NB-UVB or BB-UVB as compared to unirradiated control samples. The photos were taken on an Etaluma Lumascope LS720 microscope with a 60X objective (Meiji MA969) (scale bar 20 μm). Significance was calculated by a one-way ANOVA test and was corrected for multiple comparisons using Dunnett’s test. (*** p value < 0.0002, ** p value < 0.0021).
Biomedicines 11 03017 g003
Biomedicines 11 03017 g004
Figure 4. LINE-1 protein and mRNA expression in HaCaT and N/TERT1 cells after 6 UV exposures. (A) Measurement of ORF1 protein of LINE-1 elements using Western blotting in N/TERT1 cells. The mRNA expression of ORF2 protein of LINE-1 elements in N/TERT1 cells (n = 6) (B) and HaCaT cells (n = 3) (C) as normalized by the mRNA expression of GAPDH. Kruskal–Wallis nonparametric test was performed, and the statistical significance was corrected for multiple comparisons using Dunn’s test (** p value < 0.0021, * p value < 0.05).
Figure 4. LINE-1 protein and mRNA expression in HaCaT and N/TERT1 cells after 6 UV exposures. (A) Measurement of ORF1 protein of LINE-1 elements using Western blotting in N/TERT1 cells. The mRNA expression of ORF2 protein of LINE-1 elements in N/TERT1 cells (n = 6) (B) and HaCaT cells (n = 3) (C) as normalized by the mRNA expression of GAPDH. Kruskal–Wallis nonparametric test was performed, and the statistical significance was corrected for multiple comparisons using Dunn’s test (** p value < 0.0021, * p value < 0.05).
Biomedicines 11 03017 g004
Biomedicines 11 03017 g005
Figure 5. Time course of LINE-1 protein expression in N/TERT1 cells following 6 UV exposures with NB-UVB. (A) Immunofluorescence visualization of the expression of ORF1 protein (green) counterstained with DAPI (blue) in N/TERT1 cells (n = 5) after 6 irradiations with NB-UVB at different time points (0, 1, 3, 6, 16, and 24 h) (B) Quantification of LINE-1 expression at different time points compared with the expression immediately after NB-UVB exposure. The photos were taken on an Etaluma Lumascope LS720 microscope with a 60X objective (Meiji MA969) (scale bar 20 μm). Significance was calculated by a one-way ANOVA test corrected for multiple comparisons using Dunnett’s test. (**** p value < 0.0001, * p value < 0.05).
Figure 5. Time course of LINE-1 protein expression in N/TERT1 cells following 6 UV exposures with NB-UVB. (A) Immunofluorescence visualization of the expression of ORF1 protein (green) counterstained with DAPI (blue) in N/TERT1 cells (n = 5) after 6 irradiations with NB-UVB at different time points (0, 1, 3, 6, 16, and 24 h) (B) Quantification of LINE-1 expression at different time points compared with the expression immediately after NB-UVB exposure. The photos were taken on an Etaluma Lumascope LS720 microscope with a 60X objective (Meiji MA969) (scale bar 20 μm). Significance was calculated by a one-way ANOVA test corrected for multiple comparisons using Dunnett’s test. (**** p value < 0.0001, * p value < 0.05).
Biomedicines 11 03017 g005
Biomedicines 11 03017 g006
Figure 6. The mRNA expression of senescence markers following multiple UV exposures. The mRNA expression of senescence markers in N/TERT1 cells (n = 4) (A–E) and HaCaT cells (n = 3) (F–J) following 6 UV irradiations. Significance was calculated by the Kruskal–Wallis nonparametric test using the uncorrected Dunn’s test (** p value < 0.0021, * p value < 0.05).
Figure 6. The mRNA expression of senescence markers following multiple UV exposures. The mRNA expression of senescence markers in N/TERT1 cells (n = 4) (A–E) and HaCaT cells (n = 3) (F–J) following 6 UV irradiations. Significance was calculated by the Kruskal–Wallis nonparametric test using the uncorrected Dunn’s test (** p value < 0.0021, * p value < 0.05).
Biomedicines 11 03017 g006
Biomedicines 11 03017 g007
Figure 7. The expression of regulatory RNAs of LINE-1 reactivation. (A) LINE-1 mRNA sequence and its microRNAs binding sites. The microRNAs selected are those from the cross-search between microRNAs dysregulated upon UV irradiation and the ones that are able to target LINE-1 mRNA. (B–I) The expression of selected miRNAs in N/TERT1 cells following 6 repeated UV exposures (n = 4). Significance was calculated by one-way ANOVA using Fisher’s LSD test (* p value < 0.05).
Figure 7. The expression of regulatory RNAs of LINE-1 reactivation. (A) LINE-1 mRNA sequence and its microRNAs binding sites. The microRNAs selected are those from the cross-search between microRNAs dysregulated upon UV irradiation and the ones that are able to target LINE-1 mRNA. (B–I) The expression of selected miRNAs in N/TERT1 cells following 6 repeated UV exposures (n = 4). Significance was calculated by one-way ANOVA using Fisher’s LSD test (* p value < 0.05).
Biomedicines 11 03017 g007
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Touma, F.; Lambert, M.; Martínez Villarreal, A.; Gantchev, J.; Ramchatesingh, B.; Litvinov, I.V. The Ultraviolet Irradiation of Keratinocytes Induces Ectopic Expression of LINE-1 Retrotransposon Machinery and Leads to Cellular Senescence. Biomedicines 2023, 11, 3017. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11113017

AMA Style

Touma F, Lambert M, Martínez Villarreal A, Gantchev J, Ramchatesingh B, Litvinov IV. The Ultraviolet Irradiation of Keratinocytes Induces Ectopic Expression of LINE-1 Retrotransposon Machinery and Leads to Cellular Senescence. Biomedicines. 2023; 11(11):3017. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11113017

Chicago/Turabian Style

Touma, Fadi, Marine Lambert, Amelia Martínez Villarreal, Jennifer Gantchev, Brandon Ramchatesingh, and Ivan V. Litvinov. 2023. "The Ultraviolet Irradiation of Keratinocytes Induces Ectopic Expression of LINE-1 Retrotransposon Machinery and Leads to Cellular Senescence" Biomedicines 11, no. 11: 3017. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11113017

APA Style

Touma, F., Lambert, M., Martínez Villarreal, A., Gantchev, J., Ramchatesingh, B., & Litvinov, I. V. (2023). The Ultraviolet Irradiation of Keratinocytes Induces Ectopic Expression of LINE-1 Retrotransposon Machinery and Leads to Cellular Senescence. Biomedicines, 11(11), 3017. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11113017

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop