Next Article in Journal
Inhibitory Effectiveness in Delayed-Rectifier Potassium Current Caused by Vortioxetine, Known to Be a Novel Antidepressant
Previous Article in Journal
Rottlerin Stimulates Exosome/Microvesicle Release Via the Increase of Ceramide Levels Mediated by Ampk in an In Vitro Model of Intracellular Lipid Accumulation
Previous Article in Special Issue
Reproducible In Vitro Tissue Culture Model to Study Basic Mechanisms of Calcific Aortic Valve Disease: Comparative Analysis to Valvular Interstitials Cells
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Biomedicines
Volume 10
Issue 6
10.3390/biomedicines10061317
biomedicines-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The Haemodynamic and Pathophysiological Mechanisms of Calcific Aortic Valve Disease

by
Lydia Hanna
1,2,*,
Chlöe Armour
3,
Xiao Yun Xu
3 and
Richard Gibbs
1,2,*
1
Imperial Vascular Unit, St Mary’s Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London W2 1NY, UK
2
Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK
3
Department of Chemical Engineering, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biomedicines 2022, 10(6), 1317; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10061317
Submission received: 28 February 2022 / Revised: 13 May 2022 / Accepted: 18 May 2022 / Published: 3 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Calcific Aortic Valve Disease and Aortic Stenosis)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

1. Introduction

The aortic valve (AoV) is the outflow valve for the left heart. It opens and closes > 100,000 times a day and maintains unidirectional antegrade blood flow from the left ventricle into the aorta without regurgitation of blood, at a peak value of 1.35 ± 0.35 m/s [1]. Calcific aortic valve disease (CAVD) is a chronic, slowly progressive disorder ranging from aortic sclerosis, a mild thickening of the AoV due to accumulation of calcium deposits on the AoV without obstruction to blood flow, through to aortic stenosis, severely calcified and thickened valve leaflets that become stiff and narrowed (Figure 1). At this stage, leaflet motion is impaired and restricted, leading to left ventricular outflow obstruction and reduced blood flow through the narrowed AoV [2]. Significantly increased mechanical stress is placed on the left ventricle as the pressure gradient between the left ventricle and the aorta increases. As a result, the left ventricle hypertrophies, cardiac output decreases, and there is an increased risk of life-threatening complications such as heart failure, aortic dilatation and aneurysm formation, aortic dissection, and sudden cardiac death [2,3]. On a micro-cellular level, the AoV is subject to endothelial damage, inflammation, disruption and remodelling of the three-layered extracellular matrix (ECM) that comprises the AoV [4].
CAVD is the third commonest heart disease in the western world. The prevalence of CAVD increases significantly with advancing age and is about 10% over the age of 80 [5,6]. Furthermore, with increasing life expectancy in the developed world, CAVD now constitutes a growing global health burden with a reported 3–4-fold increase in incidence and prevalence over the last 30 years [7].
The association with increasing age has led many to classify CAVD as a passive ‘degenerative’ process due to wear-and-tear of the leaflets. Other risk factors for the development of CAVD have included those commonly associated with atherosclerosis, including male gender, cigarette smoking, hypercholesterolemia particularly of low-density lipoproteins (LDLs), hypertension and diabetes mellitus [8].
However, there is increasing evidence that CAVD is an active disease entity characterized by a cascade of cellular and molecular changes in response to haemodynamic and shear stress abnormalities, endothelial damage, inflammation, lipoprotein deposition, and genetic factors that ultimately result in calcification and ossification of the AoV [4,9,10]. It is this calcification and ossification that distinguishes CAVD from atherosclerosis that by comparison is defined by the presence of vulnerable plaques, despite early lesions of CAVD resembling atherosclerosis.
Under specific stimulators, valvular endothelial cells (VECs) and valvular interstitial cells (VICs), two cell types that are native to the AoV and integral to AoV homeostasis, are thought to develop a pro-calcific phenotype and contribute to CAVD. The exact pathways that culminate in aortic sclerosis and stenosis remain incompletely understood. To date, there is no medical therapy to prevent or halt the calcification process, and the only current treatment option is surgical replacement of the AoV or transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). A greater understanding of the mechanisms of CAVD may yield disease-specific therapeutic targets. This review will focus on the haemodynamic stimuli and downstream cellular and molecular mechanisms that contribute to the development of CAVD.

2. Anatomy and Histology of the Normal Aortic Valve

The AoV separates the left ventricle of the heart from the aorta. The normal healthy AoV is made up of three leaflets. Two of these leaflets have outflows to the coronary arteries and are known as the left and right coronary leaflets. The third leaflet is known as the non-coronary leaflet. Each leaflet is arranged in three layers and comprises an extracellular matrix (ECM) of varying degrees of elastin, collagen and glycosaminoglycans and two heterogenous cell types (VECs and VICs). The layer facing the ventricle is known as the ventricularis, and that facing the aorta is known as the fibrosa. Sandwiched in between the two is the spongiosa (Figure 2).

2.1. Layers of the Aortic Valve

The ventricularis layer is made up of elastin fibres aligned in a radial direction that facilitates changes in the shape of the leaflets to allow fast and consistent compression of the leaflets during opening and closing, ensuring correct valve closure [11]. The fibrosa is made up of circumferentially arranged type I and III collagen fibres that provide tensile strength to the leaflets [4,12]. The spongiosa is made up of a matrix of proteoglycans (PGs) and glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) that lubricate and reduce the shear between the ventricularis and fibrosa layers during valve deformation and act as ‘shock absorbers’ to resist the mechanical stress generated during the cardiac cycle [13]. All three layers are avascular, devoid of cellular infiltrates such as lymphocytes and monocytes, and are innervated by adrenergic and cholinergic nerve fibres, extracting nutrients from the surrounding blood [14,15].

2.2. Valvular Endothelial Cells (VECs)

VECs line the ventricularis and fibrosa layers only, in continuity with the ventricular endocardium and the aortic endothelium, and are in direct contact with blood and the shear forces associated with its flow through the AoV (Figure 3). Unlike vascular endothelial cells, VECs are aligned perpendicularly to the direction of blood flow. Laminar flow has been found to induce mechanotransduction pathways unique to VECs that lead to cytoskeletal reorientation [16,17,18]. As such, VECs are responsible for the translation of a variety of mechanical stimuli (alterations in flow patterns and subsequent changes in shear stress, pressure, stress and bending of the AoV) into biological responses (mechanotransduction) through a variety of cellular and molecular mechanosensors including transmembrane proteins, ion channels and cytoskeleton proteins, all of which lead to structural changes in the AoV leaflet and allow it to function and adapt in a harsh haemodynamic environment [19]. VECs are also responsible for the regulation of adhesion of inflammatory and proliferative cells, paracrine signalling [20], and VEC–VIC interaction [21,22].

2.3. Valvular Interstitial Cells (VICs)

VICs are found in each layer within the ECM. VICs comprise fibroblasts and vascular smooth muscle cells and are responsible for the synthesis of the ECM during valvulogenesis [15]. During adult life, VICs are in a quiescent state akin to quiescent fibroblasts (qVICs) and balance the production and degradation of the ECM [23]. Upon an adequate stimulus, qVICs differentiate into activated myofibroblasts (aVICs) to regulate remodelling of the ECM, dedifferentiating back to qVICs on cessation of this stimulus [24,25].
Under certain stimuli, most notably aberrant blood flow patterns and shear stress, VECs and VICs have the capacity to undergo transformation from physiological cell types integral to the normal functioning of the AoV and into a pathological phenotype through a variety of cellular and molecular responses that culminate in AoV calcification as summarized in Figure 4 and will be discussed herein.

3. The Impact of Aortic Valve Haemodynamics on Molecular Pathways That Lead to Calcification of the Aortic Valve

Calcification of the AoV follows a specific pattern with respect to the layer and leaflet affected. The early focal subendothelial lesions of CAVD and leaflet calcification are side-specific with a predilection for the fibrosa layer [4]. Similarly, the non-coronary leaflet (leaflet without coronary outflow) is the leaflet most likely to calcify [27]. Flow at the fibrosa side and non-coronary leaflet is oscillatory and of low-shear compared to the ventricular side and at the coronary leaflets where high-shear laminar flow predominates [28,29].
Finite-element analysis with in vitro cell culture studies has shown that endothelial cells exposed to shear stress waveforms within the ventricularis demonstrated increased expression of ‘atheroprotective’ transcription factors (e.g., Kruppel-like factor 2, KLF2) compared to endothelial cells exposed to shear stress waveforms in the fibrosa [30]. Conversely, low levels of KLF2 have also been found in low and oscillatory shear stress conditions (±5 dynes/cm2) of the fibrosa, whereas higher levels of KLF2 were found in high unidirectional shear stress of the ventricularis (20 dynes/cm2) [31].
Tissue transforming growth factor (TGF)-β1 has been found to be higher in patients with aortic stenosis compared to healthy controls [32,33]. The addition of TGF-β1 to sheep aortic valve interstitial cell cultures has been found to induce the formation of apoptotic alkaline phosphatase (ALP) enriched nodules as well as their calcification [34]. Exposure of the fibrosa to non-physiological pulsatile shear stress (altered haemodynamics) was found to lead to increased expression of TGF-β1 in addition to bone morphogenic protein (BMP-4), an initiator of calcification, as well as the inflammatory markers vascular adhesion molecules vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 (VCAM-1) and intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM-1), which are known to promote the migration and adhesion of inflammatory cells to endothelial cells [35]. While oscillatory shear stress, normally encountered on the fibrosa side, did not induce these responses, neither pulsatile shear stress nor oscillatory shear stress induced these responses on the ventricularis side [35]. Interestingly, BMP-4 was found to be downregulated when porcine aortic valve cells were exposed to laminar shear stress [36]. Cyclical strain has also been found to cause valve calcification. Balachandran et al. demonstrate a magnitude-dependent increased expression of BMP2 and 4 as well as suppression of runt-related transcription factor 2 (RUNX2), an osteoblast stimulator, on the fibrosa in response to elevated stretch [37].
The NOTCH signalling genes play an important role in the development of the cardiovascular system during embryonic life. Laminar shear stress has been found to activate NOTCH1 in human aortic VECs, which led to downregulation of osteoblast-like genes [38]. Mutations in NOTCH1 have resulted in severe AoV calcification due to impaired suppression of RUNX2 [39]. Furthermore, porcine aortic VICs treated with NOTCH1 inhibitors showed increased calcification compared to wild-type cells [40].
Endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EndMT) is the process whereby VECs transform into mesenchymal cells. The EndMT process underpins valvulogenesis in the embryo; however, during adult life, EndMT may contribute to CAVD. Using sheep VECs, Balachandran et al. have demonstrated that reprogramming of VECs into mesenchymal cells occurs in response to cyclical mechanical strain [41]. The authors also observed a differential downstream signalling response whereby low-strain EndMT occurred via increased TGFβ1, whereas high-strain EndMT occurred via wnt/β signalling, a pathway that has been linked to aortic valve calcification [42]. Mahler et al. also found that VECs exposed to oscillatory shear stresses underwent EndMT (increased expression of EndMT markers ACTA 2, Snail, TGF-β1, α-SMA and inflammatory proteins ICAM1 and NFKβ1) known to be expressed in the endothelium of CAVD, when compared to control VECs exposed to high steady shear [43]. Similarly, isolated porcine aortic valve endothelial cells exposed to cyclic strain resulted in upregulation of VCAM1, ICAM1 and E-selection cells [44].
Endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) is a shear-sensitive gene and is a potent vasodilator. eNOS is upregulated in response to laminar shear as part of the physiological response to maintain homeostasis of the AoV and blood vessels and is downregulated in low and oscillatory shear conditions seen in pathological disease states [45]. Among the 30 main metabolites identified in patients with aortic stenosis, 17 were found to be related to NO metabolism [46]. It has been suggested that inhibition of fibrosa calcification may be the result of diffusion of NO from the ventricularis surface and that this process is hindered at the early stages of CAVD prior to calcification [4]. Using porcine aortic valves, Richard et al. demonstrated that the ventricularis had elevated levels of cGMP expression, a surrogate for NO, compared to the fibrosa. In the same study, pulsatile, unidirectional shear stress typical of the ventricularis led to significantly more cGMP production than oscillatory shear stress patterns typical of the fibrosa [47]. Furthermore, higher osteocalcin was observed on the fibrosa side when the receptor for NO (sGC) was blocked.
MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are regulators of gene and protein expression and have also been implicated in CAVD in response to mechanical stimuli. Through microarray and bioinformatics analysis, Rathan et al. [48] were able to isolate miR-214 using porcine aortic valve leaflets in an ex vivo shear system. Under oscillatory shear stress conditions, higher expression of miR-214 and increased thickness and calcification of the fibrosa were observed in comparison to the ventricularis via a miR-214–TGFβ1 pathway. Interestingly, inhibition of miR-214 did not affect OS-induced calcification, with the authors postulating that this may be because miR-214 and its target genes may be influenced by other mechanical stimuli such as stretch, bending and cyclic strain.
Heath et al. [49] investigated miRNA-181b. Human aortic valve endothelial cells from the fibrosa and the ventricularis from heart transplant recipients were exposed to unidirectional steady sheer stress (LS) and bidirectional oscillatory shear stress. miRNA-181b was found to be significantly higher at the fibrosa under oscillatory shear stress and led to a downregulation of TIMP3, an inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinase activity (MMP), high levels of which are through to lead to ECM degradation and hasten sclerosis and calcification in CAVD.
Esmerats et al. found upregulation of ubiquitin E2 ligase C (UBE2C) in human aortic VECs through miR-483 exposed to oscillatory flow. UBE2C was also responsible for endothelial inflammation and EndMT by increasing the hypoxia-inducible factor-1α (HIF1α) level by ubiquitinating and degrading its upstream regulator, von Hippel-Lindau protein (pVHL). The same study group isolated an miR-483 mimic that was found to reduce EndMT and inflammation in human aortic valve endothelial cells and calcification of porcine AV leaflets through downregulation of UBE2C. Furthermore, treatment with PX478, an HIF-1α inhibitor, significantly reduced porcine aortic valve calcification in static and oscillatory flow conditions [50]. In recent years, there has been a focus on miRNA inhibition. Toshima et al. [51] recently demonstrated that inhibition of microRNA-34a ameliorated calcification in porcine aortic VICs through modulation of NOTCH1-RUNX2 signalling. Similarly, Yang et al. [52] demonstrate that miRNA-34c inhibits osteogenic differentiation of human VICS obtained from CAVD patients through suppression of STC1 and JNK signalling pathways.

4. Downstream Molecular and Cellular Pathways Leading to Calcific Aortic Valve Disease

4.1. Lipidogenesis

The earliest lesion of CAVD appears as a plaque composed of extracellular lipids in the subendothelial region, akin to atherosclerosis. The elastic lamina is displaced, and the plaque extends into the fibrosa [4]. Lipoproteins are particularly common, leading some to conclude they originate from the plasma [53]. The valvular endothelial dysfunction (e.g., initiated by mechanical stimuli) observed in CAVD is thought to result in the loss of the barrier function of endothelium [9,10]. This may then permit infiltration of lipids to the subendothelial region. Hypercholesterolemia and an excess of lipoprotein a (Lp(a)) are both well-described risk factors for CAVD, giving further credibility to this theory [54].
On histological analysis, oxidised low-density lipoproteins (Ox-LDL) increased along with T cells and macrophages are found in abundance close to calcium nodules in the subendothelial layer of the fibrosa [53]. High levels of plasma lipoproteins are thought to lead to CAVD through oxidation. Lipoproteins play a crucial role in carrying oxidised phospholipid (oxPL), which can activate endothelial cells, leading to an inflammatory infiltrate [55,56] that in turn may trigger the production and release of a variety of factors that stimulate VICs to acquire an osteogenic profile [4,53], as will be described later. These factors include TLR2 [57], LPC [55] and ATX [58], all of which have been found in abundance in patients with CAVD. Despite the convincing role of lipids in the pathogenesis of CAVD, randomised controlled trials (SALTIRE, SEAS, TASS, ASTRONOMER) have all failed to show that statins can prevent or regress CAVD [59,60,61,62]. While statins inhibit HMC-CoA reductase and may reduce plasma LDL levels, the negative findings in these trials may be because statins increase the levels of Lp(a) [63].

4.2. Vitamin K

Vitamin K is a lipid-soluble vitamin that functions as a cofactor for the activation of a wide variety of vitamin K-dependent proteins. Matrix G1a protein (MGP) is a vitamin K-dependent protein that also plays an important role in the inhibition of vascular calcification by inhibiting BMP-2 [64]. Significantly lower levels of MGP have been found in human AoV VICs compared to normal VICs [65]. Accordingly, in their single-centre open label randomized trial comparing 2 mg phytomenadione to placebo, Brandenburg et al. [66] observed greater progression in the aortic valve calcification score in the placebo group (n = 34) compared to the intervention arm (n = 38). Larger trials are, however, required to confirm these findings prior to the widespread use of vitamin K in clinical practice.

4.3. Inflammation

In addition to LDLs, early lesions of CAVD are also composed of inflammatory cells, including macrophages and foam cells [4], T and B cells [4,67], and mast cells [68]. Recruitment of inflammatory cells into the early lesion is thought to be due to Ox-LDL initiated upregulation of cell adhesion molecules such as ICAM1, VCAM1 and E-selection that would otherwise not be expressed on VECs under normal conditions, in addition to damaged endothelial cells. These processes ultimately permit the recruitment and trans-endothelial migration of several inflammatory cells [69,70]. It is widely recognized that inflammatory cells release several proinflammatory and pro-osteogenic molecules that contribute to the osteogenic profile differentiation of VICs and that are responsible for ECM degradation/remodelling, all of which has been implicated in the pathogenesis of CAVD. These include TNFa, IL1B, IL-6, RANKL, MMPs, oligoclonal CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. Receptor Activator of Nuclear factor Kappa B Ligand (RANKL) and osteoprotegrin (OPG) are two noteworthy inflammatory molecules. Both are known to be involved in bone turnover and vascular calcification. In addition, they have been found in abundance in calcific human aortic valves with the ability to stimulate the differentiation of VICs into an osteoblastic phenotype [71]. Denosumab, an IgG2 monoclonal antibody and RANKL inhibitor, was postulated to be a potential medical treatment that may halt CAVD. However, the SALTIRE2 trial found that Denosumab had no effect of disease progression of aortic stenosis as assessed by echocardiography, computed tomography or 18F-sodium fluoride positron emission tomography [72]. Alendronic acid, a bisphosphonate used to decrease bone osteoclastic activity in osteoporosis, similarly had no effect [72].
Macrophages and VICs have also been found to release extracellular vesicles (EV), membrane vesicles secreted from cells that contain intracellular contents, and have been implicated in microcalcification in AoV disease [73]. Under pathological conditions, calcifying EVs have been found to form spherical microcalcifications that may fuse together to form macrocalcifications and cause dysfunction of the valves [74].

4.4. Angiotensin Converting Enzyme (ACE)

Angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) has also been implicated in the pathogenesis of CAVD. High levels of ACE and angiotensin II, as well as AT1R, a receptor for angiotensin II, not otherwise found in normal AoVs, have all been found in human stenotic AoVs [75]. Angiotensin II is thought to promote inflammation and fibrosis in AoVs through many downstream signalling pathways [76]. Interestingly, while some ACE may be produced locally, or colocalizes with macrophages, the majority (including angiotensin II) is ‘carried’ into the subendothelial lesion via LDL (apolipoprotein B) protein in cholesterol particles [75]. Binding of angiotensin II to the AT1R leads to expression of several inflammatory markers such is ICAM1 and VCAM1 [77]. Inhibition of ATR1 with Olmesartan was also found to inhibit osteoblast differentiation in the AoVs of hypercholesterolemic rabbits [78]. Similarly, the use of ACE inhibitor (ACEI) in patients has been found to reduce AoV calcium accumulation under electron beam computed tomographic scans [79] and reduced the progression of aortic sclerosis [80]. However, other studies have found no difference in haemodynamic progression of aortic stenosis with the use of ACEI [81].

4.5. Reactive Oxygen Species

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are chemical forms of molecular oxygen that exist as free radial species with at least one free electron such as superoxide, and nonradical species with two electrons such as hydrogen peroxide. Their physiological functions include the regulation of cell growth and differentiation and the modulation of several metabolic processes; however, their pathological role can lead to DNA damage and dysfunctional DNA repair mechanisms [82,83]. A key feature of ROS is their ability to oxidise other molecules such as LDLs [84]. Interestingly, in bovine VECs, an increase in oxidised LDL has been found to correlate with the upregulation of NADPH oxidase, an important complex involved in the generation of superoxide [85]. High levels of ROS including superoxide and hydrogen peroxide have been found in calcified human aortic valves [86,87,88,89]. Exogenous ROS have been found to promote calcification of VICs through RUNX2 and other pro-osteogenic signalling pathways [87] as well as VCAM1 expression [89]. Furthermore, ROS-inhibiting treatments have been found to decrease calcium nodule formation in porcine and rabbit VICs [89,90,91], reduce ROS-induced DNA damage in VICs identified in stenosed AoV from CAVD patients [87] and dampen the TNF-alpha mediated endothelial inflammatory response, myofibroblast activation, calcification and ECM degradation [89].

5. Valvular Endothelial Cell to Valvular Interstitial Cell Interactions in the Pathogenesis of Calcific Aortic Valve Disease

VECs and VICs are the key effector cells in AoV physiology, but also in pathophysiological conditions such as CAVD, when both cell types may exhibit pro-calcific behaviour. To date, there is no definitive direct link between VECs and CAVD. However, several studies would seem to suggest the pro-osteogenic role of VECs in CAVD. VECs on the fibrosa express fewer inhibitors of calcification compared to the ventricularis side [92]. As highlighted above, abnormalities in physiological shear stress are likely to account for this phenotypic heterogeneity that can then activate a cascade of cellular, molecular, and inflammatory pathways, including EndMT, that ultimately result in aortic calve calcification. Hjortnaes et al. also demonstrated the osteogenic differentiation of VECs via EndMT in stenotic human aortic valves with significant increases in ALP, TGFB1, and RUNX2. The same group were also able to propose that VEC may act as a reservoir for VICs with the propensity to develop into osteogenic VICs [93].
VICs are the predominant cell type in the AoV. In addition to qVICs, VICs can also differentiate into activated myofibroblast-like VICs (aVICs) expressing alpha smooth muscle actin (alpha-SMA) responsible for ECM remodelling, and an osteogenic phenotype (oVIC), which is the prevailing cell that deposits calcium in the AoV. The mechanisms that lead to the differentiation of oVIC remain poorly understood. However, as mentioned in the preceding sections, inflammatory markers such as TGF-B, IL-6, TNF, and NFKB have all been implicated [94]. In turn, calcification induced by VICs is thought to involve BMP2-mediated ALP expression [95].
The interactions between VECs and VICs and their impact on valve integrity remain of great interest. The study by Hjortnaes et al. [93] demonstrated that VICs could prevent the osteogenic differentiation of VECs, but VECs could not prevent the formation of oVICs. Conversely, Richards et al. [47] demonstrated that porcine VECs inhibited VIC-mediated calcification by inhibiting myofibroblastic activation and osteogenic differentiation. These findings serve to highlight the complexity of the inter-cellular pathways that remain incompletely characterized.

6. The Role of the Extracellular Matrix

In addition to lipid deposition (early lesion) and calcification (late lesion), thickening and fibrosis of the AoV is another histological feature of CAVD. Prior to the development of thickened and fibrotic valves, it is likely the ECM undergoes degradation followed by (abnormal) remodelling. However, as previously discussed, high levels of MMPs have been found in CAVD [96,97,98]. VICs, macrophages and monocytes are thought to be one source of these ECM-degrading enzymes [98,99]. Paradoxically, increased expression of tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases (TIMPS) has also been found in CAVD [97,99]. At some point in the disease process, probably under the influence of inflammatory markers and other cytokines, MMP expression surpasses that of TIMP, shifting the balance towards ECM degradation [97]. Proteases including cathepsins have also been detected in high levels close to the sites of valvular angiogenesis, suggesting that ECM degradation by these enzymes facilitates the growth of new blood vessels [100].
Thickening and fibrosis of the AoV are due to unregulated and disorganised deposition of ECM components such as collagen, resulting in overgrowth and scarring of the valve [101]. TGF-B has been implicated in this process with a sustained production of wide and dense collagen fibres in the spongiosa layer compared to shorter fibres found in the fibrosa layer [102]. These changes are likely to be mediated by signalling pathways related to VICs.

7. Future Perspectives

7.1. Clinical Translation of Aortic Haemodynamics for the Diagnosis and Prognostication of Calcific Aortic Valve Disease

Recent developments in 3-dimensional (3D) phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging (PC-MRI) with 3-directional velocity encoding, known as 4D flow MRI, now afford us the ability to directly quantify advanced haemodynamic parameters such as wall shear stress and pressure gradients in a wide range of cardiovascular diseases, including AoV disease, that may in the future aid disease diagnosis and prognostication and guide the timing of surgical intervention, beyond conventional imaging techniques. Archer et al. [103] note that 4D flow-derived pressure gradient across the AoV was more consistent with invasive pressure gradient measures than Doppler echocardiography. The pressure gradient change in 4D flow was also found to correlate better with left ventricular mass regression, an independent predictor of improved long-term survival [104]. Furthermore, both pressure gradient and effective orifice assessment of the valve by 4D flow were better associated to exercise tolerance as assessed by the New York Heart Association classification (NYHA) of heart failure and the six-minute walk test (6MWT), both objective measures that are increasingly used to guide the timing of AoV intervention [103]. Binter et al. [105] demonstrate that 4D flow turbulent kinetic energy (TKE), a measure of energy loss in disturbed flow such as that seen in AS not otherwise measured by echocardiography, provided valuable information regarding aortic stenosis severity. The abnormal flow patterns generated by aortic stenosis and the resultant stress on the left ventricle can also be visualized and quantified on 4D flow. Von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff et al. [106] observed greater helical and vortical flow formation and eccentricity with elevated peak systolic shear stress in patients with aortic stenosis compared to healthy controls. Stronger vortical flow formations were associated with a high left ventricular mass index. In perhaps the largest study (n = 571) to use 4D flow in aortic stenosis patients, Ooji et al. [107] were able to deduce wall shear stress (WSS), the measure that is consistently demonstrated to influence endothelial cell function and valvular remodelling, and demonstrated that moderate to severe aortic stenosis increased WSS magnitude and variability in the ascending aorta. While these studies suggest a potential link between the resultant abnormal haemodynamics following aortic stenosis and impaired left ventricular function, there remains a paucity of longitudinal studies that have demonstrated a link between haemodynamic measures and progression of CAVD and whether the use of haemodynamic measures has the potential to influence clinical management for patients. These are certainly areas for future research.

7.2. Pharmacological Clinical Trials for Calcific Aortic Disease

While several pharmacological clinical trials have yielded disappointing results, the search for an effective medical therapy to combat CAVD continues. Table 1 summarises the ongoing clinical trials in CAVD.

8. Conclusions

Calcific aortic valve disease (CAVD) is a multifactorial disease. The complex flow patterns that surround the valve are the likely stimulus that sets off a cascade of cellular, molecular, and inflammatory pathways that may be exacerbated by risk factors, and that ultimately lead to calcification of the valve. These cell-signalling pathways are potential therapeutic targets that may in the future prevent the development and progression of the disease and abolish the need for surgical replacement of the diseased valve.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.H., C.A., X.Y.X. and R.G.; writing—original draft preparation, L.H. and C.A.; writing—review and editing, L.H., C.A., X.Y.X. and R.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Infrastructure for this project was provided by Imperial NIHR BRC.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Otto, C.M. Clinical practice. Evaluation and management of chronic mitral regurgitation. N. Engl. J. Med. 2001, 345, 740–746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Rader, F.; Sachdev, E.; Arsanjani, R.; Siegel, R.J. Left ventricular hypertrophy in valvular aortic stenosis: Mechanisms and clinical implications. Am. J. Med. 2015, 128, 344–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Bäck, M.; Gasser, T.C.; Michel, J.B.; Caligiuri, G. Biomechanical factors in the biology of aortic wall and aortic valve diseases. Cardiovasc. Res. 2013, 99, 232–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Otto, C.M.; Kuusisto, J.; Reichenbach, D.D.; Gown, A.M.; O’Brien, K.D. Characterization of the early lesion of ‘degenerative’ valvular aortic stenosis. Histological and immunohistochemical studies. Circulation 1994, 90, 844–853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Bonow, R.O.; Greenland, P. Population-Wide Trends in Aortic Stenosis Incidence and Outcomes. Circulation 2015, 131, 969–971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Eveborn, G.W.; Schirmer, H.; Heggelund, G.; Lunde, P.; Rasmussen, K. The evolving epidemiology of valvular aortic stenosis. The Tromsø study. Heart 2013, 99, 396–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Yi, B.; Zeng, W.; Lv, L.; Hua, P. Changing epidemiology of calcific aortic valve disease: 30-year trends of incidence, prevalence, and deaths across 204 countries and territories. Aging 2021, 13, 12710–12732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Chen, H.Y.; Engert, J.C.; Thanassoulis, G. Risk factors for valvular calcification. Curr. Opin. Endocrinol. Diabetes Obes. 2019, 26, 96–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Mohler, E.R., 3rd; Gannon, F.; Reynolds, C.; Zimmerman, R.; Keane, M.G.; Kaplan, F.S. Bone formation and inflammation in cardiac valves. Circulation 2001, 103, 1522–1528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Cote, N.; Mahmut, A.; Bosse, Y.; Couture, C.; Pagé, S.; Trahan, S.; Boulanger, M.C.; Fournier, D.; Pibarot, P.; Mathieu, P. Inflammation is associated with the remodeling of calcific aortic valve disease. Inflammation 2013, 36, 573–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Vesely, I. The role of elastin in aortic valve mechanics. J. Biomech. 1998, 31, 115–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Xu, S.; Liu, A.C.; Gotlieb, A.I. Common pathogenic features of atherosclerosis and calcific aortic stenosis: Role of transforming growth factor-beta. Cardiovasc. Pathol. 2010, 19, 236–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Tseng, H.; Grande-Allen, K.J. Elastic fibers in the aortic valve spongiosa: A fresh perspective on its structure and role in overall tissue function. Acta Biomater. 2011, 7, 2101–2108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Chester, A.H.; Kershaw, J.D.; Sarathchandra, P.; Yacoub, M.H. Localisation and function of nerves in the aortic root. J. Mol. Cell Cardiol. 2008, 44, 1045–1052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. El-Hamamsy, I.; Yacoub, M.H.; Chester, A.H. Neuronal regulation of aortic valve cusps. Curr. Vasc. Pharmacol. 2009, 7, 40–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Deck, J.D. Endothelial cell orientation on aortic valve leaflets. Cardiovasc. Res. 1986, 20, 760–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Butcher, J.T.; Penrod, A.M.; García, A.J.; Nerem, R.M. Unique morphology and focal adhesion development of valvular endothelial cells in static and fluid flow environments. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2004, 24, 1429–1434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Malek, A.M.; Izumo, S. Mechanism of endothelial cell shape change and cytoskeletal remodeling in response to fluid shear stress. J. Cell Sci. 1996, 109, 713–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Butcher, J.T.; Nerem, R.M. Valvular endothelial cells and the mechanoregulation of valvular pathology. Philos. Trans. R Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 2007, 362, 1445–1457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Mahler, G.J.; Farrar, E.J.; Butcher, J.T. Inflammatory cytokines promote mesenchymal transformation in embryonic and adult valve endothelial cells. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2013, 33, 121–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Gould, S.T.; Matherly, E.E.; Smith, J.N.; Heistad, D.D.; Anseth, K.S. The role of valvular endothelial cell paracrine signaling and matrix elasticity on valvular interstitial cell activation. Biomaterials 2014, 35, 3596–3606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Shapero, K.; Wylie-Sears, J.; Levine, R.A.; Mayer, J.E., Jr.; Bischoff, J. Reciprocal interactions between mitral valve endothelial and interstitial cells reduce endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition and myofibroblastic activation. J. Mol. Cell Cardiol. 2015, 80, 175–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Johnson, C.L.; Merryman, W.D. Side-specific valvular endothelial-interstitial cell mechano-communication via cadherin-11. J. Biomech. 2021, 119, 110253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Liu, A.C.; Joag, V.R.; Gotlieb, A.I. The emerging role of valve interstitial cell phenotypes in regulating heart valve pathobiology. Am. J. Pathol. 2007, 171, 1407–1418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Wang, H.; Leinwand, L.A.; Anseth, K.S. Cardiac valve cells and their microenvironment—Insights from in vitro studies. Nat. Rev. Cardio. 2014, 11, 715–727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Alushi, B.; Curini, L.; Christopher, M.R.; Grubitzch, H.; Landmesser, U.; Amedei, A.; Lauten, A. Calcific Aortic Valve Disease—Natural History and Future Therapeutic Strategies. Front. Pharmacol. 2020, 11, 685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Halevi, R.; Hamdan, A.; Marom, G.; Mega, M.; Raanani, E.; Haj-Ali, R. Progressive aortic valve calcification: Three-dimensional visualization and biomechanical analysis. J. Biomech. 2015, 48, 489–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Balachandran, K.; Sucosky, P.; Yoganathan, A.P. Hemodynamics and mechanobiology of aortic valve inflammation and calcification. Int. J. Inflam. 2011, 2011, 263870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Cujec, B.; Pollick, C. Isolated thickening of one aortic cusp: Preferential thickening of the noncoronary cusp. J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr. 1988, 1, 430–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Weinberg, E.J.; Mack, P.J.; Schoen, F.J.; García-Cardeña, G.; Kaazempur Mofrad, M.R. Hemodynamic environments from opposing sides of human aortic valve leaflets evoke distinct endothelial phenotypes in vitro. Cardiovasc. Eng. 2010, 10, 5–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Holliday, C.J.; Ankeny, R.F.; Jo, H.; Nerem, R.M. Discovery of shear- and side-specific mRNAs and miRNAs in human aortic valvular endothelial cells. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 2011, 301, H856–H867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Villar, A.V.; Cobo, M.; Llano, M.; Montalvo, C.; González-Vílchez, F.; Martín-Durán, R.; Hurlé, M.A.; Nistal, J.F. Plasma levels of transforming growth factor-beta1 reflect left ventricular remodeling in aortic stenosis. PLoS ONE 2009, 4, e8476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Yetkin, E.; Tchaikovski, V.; Erdil, N.; Alan, S.; Waltenberger, J. Increased expression of cystatin C and transforming growth factor beta-1 in calcific aortic valves. Int. J. Cardiol. 2014, 176, 1252–1254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Jian, B.; Narula, N.; Li, Q.Y.; Mohler, E.R., 3rd; Levy, R.J. Progression of aortic valve stenosis: TGF-beta1 is present in calcified aortic valve cusps and promotes aortic valve interstitial cell calcification via apoptosis. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2003, 75, 457–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Sucosky, P.; Balachandran, K.; Elhammali, A.; Jo, H.; Yoganathan, A.P. Altered shear stress stimulates upregulation of endothelial VCAM-1 and ICAM-1 in a BMP-4- and TGF-beta1-dependent pathway. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2009, 29, 254–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Butcher, J.T.; Tressel, S.; Johnson, T.; Turner, D.; Sorescu, G.; Jo, H.; Nerem, R.M. Transcriptional profiles of valvular and vascular endothelial cells reveal phenotypic differences: Influence of shear stress. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2006, 26, 69–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Balachandran, K.; Sucosky, P.; Jo, H.; Yoganathan, A.P. Elevated cyclic stretch induces aortic valve calcification in a bone morphogenic protein-dependent manner. Am. J. Pathol. 2010, 177, 49–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. White, M.P.; Theodoris, C.V.; Liu, L.; Collins, W.J.; Blue, K.W.; Lee, J.H.; Meng, X.; Robbins, R.C.; Ivey, K.N.; Srivastava, D. NOTCH1 regulates matrix gla protein and calcification gene networks in human valve endothelium. J. Mol. Cell Cardiol. 2015, 84, 13–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Garg, V.; Muth, A.N.; Ransom, J.F.; Schluterman, M.K.; Barnes, R.; King, I.N.; Grossfeld, P.D.; Srivastava, D. Mutations in NOTCH1 cause aortic valve disease. Nature 2005, 437, 270–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Driscoll, K.; Gee, T.; Butcher, J. The Cell-specific Engagement of Notch and Wnt Pathways in Calcific Aortic Valve Disease. Struct. Heart 2021, 5, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Balachandran, K.; Alford, P.W.; Wylie-Sears, J.; Goss, J.A.; Grosberg, A.; Bischoff, J.; Aikawa, E.; Levine, R.A.; Parker, K.K. Cyclic strain induces dual-mode endothelial-mesenchymal transformation of the cardiac valve. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 19943–19948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Albanese, I.; Yu, B.; Al-Kindi, H.; Barratt, B.; Ott, L.; Al-Refai, M.; de Varennes, B.; Shum-Tim, D.; Cerruti, M.; Gourgas, O.; et al. Role of Noncanonical Wnt Signaling Pathway in Human Aortic Valve Calcification. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2017, 37, 543–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Mahler, G.J.; Frendl, C.M.; Cao, Q.; Butcher, J.T. Effects of shear stress pattern and magnitude on mesenchymal transformation and invasion of aortic valve endothelial cells. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2014, 111, 2326–2337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Metzler, S.A.; Pregonero, C.A.; Butcher, J.T.; Burgess, S.C.; Warnock, J.N. Cyclic strain regulates pro-inflammatory protein expression in porcine aortic valve endothelial cells. J. Heart Valve Dis. 2008, 17, 571–577. [Google Scholar]
  45. Ozawa, N.; Shichiri, M.; Iwashina, M.; Fukai, N.; Yoshimoto, T.; Hirata, Y. Laminar shear stress up-regulates inducible nitric oxide synthase in the endothelium. Hypertens. Res. 2004, 27, 93–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. van Driel, B.O.; Schuldt, M.; Algül, S.; Levin, E.; Güclü, A.; Germans, T.; Rossum, A.C.V.; Pei, J.; Harakalova, M.; Baas, A.; et al. Metabolomics in Severe Aortic Stenosis Reveals Intermediates of Nitric Oxide Synthesis as Most Distinctive Markers. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 3569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Richards, J.; El-Hamamsy, I.; Chen, S.; Sarang, Z.; Sarathchandra, P.; Yacoub, M.H.; Chester, A.H.; Butcher, J.T. Side-specific endothelial-dependent regulation of aortic valve calcification: Interplay of hemodynamics and nitric oxide signaling. Am. J. Pathol. 2013, 182, 1922–1931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Rathan, S.; Ankeny, C.J.; Arjunon, S.; Ferdous, Z.; Kumar, S.; Fernandez Esmerats, J.; Heath, J.M.; Nerem, R.M.; Yoganathan, A.P.; Jo, H. Identification of side- and shear-dependent microRNAs regulating porcine aortic valve pathogenesis. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 25397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Heath, J.M.; Fernandez Esmerats, J.; Khambouneheuang, L.; Kumar, S.; Simmons, R.; Jo, H. Mechanosensitive microRNA-181b Regulates Aortic Valve Endothelial Matrix Degradation by Targeting TIMP3. Cardiovasc. Eng. Technol. 2018, 9, 141–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Fernandez Esmerats, J.; Villa-Roel, N.; Kumar, S.; Gu, L.; Salim, M.T.; Ohh, M.; Taylor, W.R.; Nerem, R.M.; Yoganathan, A.P.; Jo, H. Disturbed Flow Increases UBE2C (Ubiquitin E2 Ligase C) via Loss of miR-483-3p, Inducing Aortic Valve Calcification by the pVHL (von Hippel-Lindau Protein) and HIF-1alpha (Hypoxia-Inducible Factor-1alpha) Pathway in Endothelial Cells. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2019, 39, 467–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Toshima, T.; Watanabe, T.; Narumi, T.; Otaki, Y.; Shishido, T.; Aono, T.; Goto, J.; Watanabe, K.; Sugai, T.; Takahashi, T.; et al. Therapeutic inhibition of microRNA-34a ameliorates aortic valve calcification via modulation of Notch1-Runx2 signalling. Cardiovasc. Res. 2020, 116, 983–994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Yang, L.; Zhu, X.; Ni, Y.; Wu, D.; Tian, Y.; Chen, Z.; Li, M.; Zhang, H.; Liang, D. MicroRNA-34c Inhibits Osteogenic Differentiation and Valvular Interstitial Cell Calcification via STC1-Mediated JNK Pathway in Calcific Aortic Valve Disease. Front. Physiol. 2020, 11, 829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. O’Brien, K.D.; Reichenbach, D.D.; Marcovina, S.M.; Kuusisto, J.; Alpers, C.E.; Otto, C.M. Apolipoproteins B, (a), and E accumulate in the morphologically early lesion of ‘degenerative’ valvular aortic stenosis. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 1996, 16, 523–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Nordestgaard, B.G.; Langsted, A. Lipoprotein (a) as a cause of cardiovascular disease: Insights from epidemiology, genetics, and biology. J. Lipid Res. 2016, 57, 1953–1975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Mahmut, A.; Boulanger, M.C.; El Husseini, D.; Fournier, D.; Bouchareb, R.; Després, J.P.; Pibarot, P.; Bossé, Y.; Mathieu, P. Elevated expression of lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 in calcific aortic valve disease: Implications for valve mineralization. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2014, 63, 460–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Berliner, J.A.; Leitinger, N.; Tsimikas, S. The role of oxidized phospholipids in atherosclerosis. J. Lipid Res. 2009, 50, S207–S212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Meng, X.; Ao, L.; Song, Y.; Babu, A.; Yang, X.; Wang, M.; Weyant, M.J.; Dinarello, C.A.; Cleveland, J.C., Jr.; Fullerton, D.A. Expression of functional Toll-like receptors 2 and 4 in human aortic valve interstitial cells: Potential roles in aortic valve inflammation and stenosis. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 2008, 294, C29–C35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Bouchareb, R.; Mahmut, A.; Nsaibia, M.J.; Boulanger, M.C.; Dahou, A.; Lépine, J.L.; Laflamme, M.H.; Hadji, F.; Couture, C.; Trahan, S. Autotaxin Derived from Lipoprotein (a) and Valve Interstitial Cells Promotes Inflammation and Mineralization of the Aortic Valve. Circulation 2015, 132, 677–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Cowell, S.J.; Newby, D.E.; Prescott, R.J.; Bloomfield, P.; Reid, J.; Northridge, D.B.; Boon, N.A. A randomized trial of intensive lipid-lowering therapy in calcific aortic stenosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2005, 352, 2389–2397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Farmer, J.A. Intensive lipid lowering with simvastatin and ezetimibe in aortic stenosis (the SEAS trial). Curr. Atheroscler. Rep. 2009, 11, 82–83. [Google Scholar]
  61. Chan, K.L.; Dumesnil, J.G.; Ni, A.; Tam, J. Effect of Lipid lowering with rosuvastatin on progression of aortic stenosis: Results of the aortic stenosis progression observation: Measuring effects of rosuvastatin (ASTRONOMER) trial. Circulation 2010, 121, 306–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Dichtl, W.; Alber, H.F.; Feuchtner, G.M.; Hintringer, F.; Reinthaler, M.; Bartel, T.; Süssenbacher, A.; Grander, W.; Ulmer, H.; Pachinger, O.; et al. Prognosis and risk factors in patients with asymptomatic aortic stenosis and their modulation by atorvastatin (20 mg). Am. J. Cardiol. 2008, 102, 743–748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Capoulade, R.; Chan, K.L.; Yeang, C.; Mathieu, P.; Bossé, Y.; Dumesnil, J.G.; Tam, J.W.; Teo, K.K.; Mahmut, A.; Yang, X.; et al. Oxidized Phospholipids, Lipoprotein (a), and Progression of Calcific Aortic Valve Stenosis. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2015, 66, 1236–1246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Chiyoya, M.; Seya, K.; Yu, Z.; Daitoku, K.; Motomura, S.; Imaizumi, T.; Fukuda, I.; Furukawa, K.I. Matrix Gla protein negatively regulates calcification of human aortic valve interstitial cells isolated from calcified aortic valves. J. Pharmacol. Sci. 2018, 136, 257–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Venardos, N.; Bennett, B.; Weyant, M.J.; Reece, T.B.; Meng, X.; Fullerton, D.A. Matrix Gla protein regulates calcification of the aortic valve. J. Surg. Res. 2015, 199, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Brandenburg, V.M.; Reinartz, S.; Kaesler, N.; Krüger, T.; Dirrichs, T.; Kramann, R.; Peeters, F.; Floege, J.; Keszei, A.; Marx, N. Slower Progress of Aortic Valve Calcification with Vitamin K Supplementation: Results from a Prospective Interventional Proof-of-Concept Study. Circulation 2017, 135, 2081–2083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Natorska, J.; Marek, G.; Sadowski, J.; Undas, A. Presence of B cells within aortic valves in patients with aortic stenosis: Relation to severity of the disease. J. Cardiol. 2016, 67, 80–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Helske, S.; Lindstedt, K.A.; Laine, M.; Mäyränpää, M.; Werkkala, K.; Lommi, J.; Turto, H.; Kupari, M.; Kovanen, P.T. Induction of local angiotensin II-producing systems in stenotic aortic valves. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2004, 44, 1859–1866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Ghaisas, N.K.; Foley, J.B.; O’Briain, D.S.; Crean, P.; Kelleher, D.; Walsh, M. Adhesion molecules in nonrheumatic aortic valve disease: Endothelial expression, serum levels and effects of valve replacement. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2000, 36, 2257–2262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Passos, L.S.A.; Lupieri, A.; Becker-Greene, D.; Aikawa, E. Innate and adaptive immunity in cardiovascular calcification. Atherosclerosis 2020, 306, 59–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Kaden, J.J.; Bickelhaupt, S.; Grobholz, R.; Haase, K.K.; Sarikoç, A.; Kiliç, R.; Brueckmann, M.; Lang, S.; Zahn, I.; Vahl, C.; et al. Receptor activator of nuclear factor kappaB ligand and osteoprotegerin regulate aortic valve calcification. J. Mol. Cell Cardiol. 2004, 36, 57–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Pawade, T.A.; Doris, M.K.; Bing, R.; White, A.C.; Forsyth, L.; Evans, E.; Graham, C.; Williams, M.C.; van Beek, E.J.R.; Fletcher, A.; et al. Effect of Denosumab or Alendronic Acid on the Progression of Aortic Stenosis: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial. Circulation 2021, 143, 2418–2427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Diehl, P.; Nagy, F.; Sossong, V.; Helbing, T.; Beyersdorf, F.; Olschewski, M.; Bode, C.; Moser, M. Increased levels of circulating microparticles in patients with severe aortic valve stenosis. Thromb. Haemost. 2008, 99, 711–719. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  74. Shroff, R.C.; McNair, R.; Skepper, J.N.; Figg, N.; Schurgers, L.J.; Deanfield, J.; Rees, L.; Shanahan, C.M. Chronic mineral dysregulation promotes vascular smooth muscle cell adaptation and extracellular matrix calcification. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2010, 21, 103–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. O’Brien, K.D.; Shavelle, D.M.; Caulfield, M.T.; McDonald, T.O.; Olin-Lewis, K.; Otto, C.M.; Probstfield, J.L. Association of angiotensin-converting enzyme with low-density lipoprotein in aortic valvular lesions and in human plasma. Circulation 2002, 106, 2224–2230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  76. Mehta, P.K.; Griendling, K.K. Angiotensin II cell signaling: Physiological and pathological effects in the cardiovascular system. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 2007, 292, C82–C97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Suzuki, Y.; Ruiz-Ortega, M.; Lorenzo, O.; Ruperez, M.; Esteban, V.; Egido, J. Inflammation and angiotensin II. Int. J. Biochem. Cell. Biol. 2003, 35, 881–900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Arishiro, K.; Hoshiga, M.; Negoro, N.; Jin, D.; Takai, S.; Miyazaki, M.; Ishihara, T.; Hanafusa, T. Angiotensin receptor-1 blocker inhibits atherosclerotic changes and endothelial disruption of the aortic valve in hypercholesterolemic rabbits. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2007, 49, 1482–1489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. O’Brien, K.D.; Probstfield, J.L.; Caulfield, M.T.; Nasir, K.; Takasu, J.; Shavelle, D.M.; Wu, A.H.; Zhao, X.Q.; Budoff, M.J. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and change in aortic valve calcium. Arch. Intern. Med. 2005, 165, 858–862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Bull, S.; Loudon, M.; Francis, J.M.; Joseph, J.; Gerry, S.; Karamitsos, T.D.; Prendergast, B.D.; Banning, A.P.; Neubauer, S.; Myerson, S.G. A prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial of the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor Ramipril in Aortic Stenosis (RIAS trial). Eur. Heart J. Cardiovasc. Imaging. 2015, 16, 834–841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Rosenhek, R.; Rader, F.; Loho, N.; Gabriel, H.; Heger, M.; Klaar, U.; Schemper, M.; Binder, T.; Maurer, G.; Baumgartner, H. Statins but not angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors delay progression of aortic stenosis. Circulation 2004, 110, 1291–1295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  82. Zhang, L.; Wang, X.; Cueto, R.; Effi, C.; Zhang, Y.; Tan, H.; Qin, X.; Ji, Y.; Yang, X.; Wang, H. Biochemical basis and metabolic interplay of redox regulation. Redox Biol. 2019, 26, 101284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Sena, L.A.; Chandel, N.S. Physiological roles of mitochondrial reactive oxygen species. Mol. Cell 2012, 48, 158–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  84. Sies, H.; Jones, D.P. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) as pleiotropic physiological signalling agents. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2020, 21, 363–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Hwang, J.; Ing, M.H.; Salazar, A.; Lassègue, B.; Griendling, K.; Navab, M.; Sevanian, A.; Hsiai, T.K. Pulsatile versus oscillatory shear stress regulates NADPH oxidase subunit expression: Implication for native LDL oxidation. Circ. Res. 2003, 93, 1225–1232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  86. Miller, J.D.; Chu, Y.; Brooks, R.M.; Richenbacher, W.E.; Peña-Silva, R.; Heistad, D.D. Dysregulation of antioxidant mechanisms contributes to increased oxidative stress in calcific aortic valvular stenosis in humans. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2008, 52, 843–850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  87. Branchetti, E.; Sainger, R.; Poggio, P.; Grau, J.B.; Patterson-Fortin, J.; Bavaria, J.E.; Chorny, M.; Lai, E.; Gorman, R.C.; Levy, R.J.; et al. Antioxidant enzymes reduce DNA damage and early activation of valvular interstitial cells in aortic valve sclerosis. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2013, 33, e66–e74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Liberman, M.; Bassi, E.; Martinatti, M.K.; Lario, F.C.; Wosniak, J., Jr.; Pomerantzeff, P.M.; Laurindo, F.R. Oxidant generation predominates around calcifying foci and enhances progression of aortic valve calcification. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2008, 28, 463–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Farrar, E.J.; Huntley, G.D.; Butcher, J. Endothelial-derived oxidative stress drives myofibroblastic activation and calcification of the aortic valve. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0123257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Das, D.; Holmes, A.; Murphy, G.A.; Mishra, K.; Rosenkranz, A.C.; Horowitz, J.D.; Kennedy, J.A. TGF-beta1-Induced MAPK activation promotes collagen synthesis, nodule formation, redox stress and cellular senescence in porcine aortic valve interstitial cells. J. Heart Valve Dis. 2013, 22, 621–630. [Google Scholar]
  91. Liu, H.; Wang, L.; Pan, Y.; Wang, X.; Ding, Y.; Zhou, C.; Shah, A.M.; Zhao, G.; Zhang, M. Celastrol Alleviates Aortic Valve Calcification Via Inhibition of NADPH Oxidase 2 in Valvular Interstitial Cells. JACC Basic Transl. Sci. 2020, 5, 35–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Simmons, C.A.; Grant, G.R.; Manduchi, E. Davies, P.F. Spatial heterogeneity of endothelial phenotypes correlates with side-specific vulnerability to calcification in normal porcine aortic valves. Circ. Res. 2005, 96, 792–799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  93. Hjortnaes, J.; Shapero, K.; Goettsch, C.; Hutcheson, J.D.; Keegan, J.; Kluin, J.; Mayer, J.E.; Bischoff, J.; Aikawa, E. Valvular interstitial cells suppress calcification of valvular endothelial cells. Atherosclerosis 2015, 242, 251–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  94. Rutkovskiy, A.; Malashicheva, A.; Sullivan, G.; Bogdanova, M.; Kostareva, A.; Stensløkken, K.O.; Fiane, A.; Vaage, J. Valve Interstitial Cells: The Key to Understanding the Pathophysiology of Heart Valve Calcification. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2017, 6, e006339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Gomez-Stallons, M.V.; Wirrig-Schwendeman, E.E.; Hassel, K.R.; Conway, S.J.; Yutzey, K.E. Bone Morphogenetic Protein Signaling Is Required for Aortic Valve Calcification. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2016, 36, 1398–1405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Edep, M.E.; Shirani, J.; Wolf, P.; Brown, D.L. Matrix metalloproteinase expression in nonrheumatic aortic stenosis. Cardiovasc. Pathol. 2000, 9, 281–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Satta, J.; Oiva, J.; Salo, T.; Eriksen, H.; Ohtonen, P.; Biancari, F.; Juvonen, T.S.; Soini, Y. Evidence for an altered balance between matrix metalloproteinase-9 and its inhibitors in calcific aortic stenosis. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2003, 76, 681–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Fondard, O.; Detaintm, D.; Iung, B.; Choqueux, C.; Adle-Biassette, H.; Jarraya, M.; Hvass, U.; Couetil, J.P.; Henin, D.; Michel, J.B.; et al. Extracellular matrix remodelling in human aortic valve disease: The role of matrix metalloproteinases and their tissue inhibitors. Eur. Heart J. 2005, 26, 1333–1341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Kaden, J.J.; Dempfle, C.E.; Grobholz, R.; Fischer, C.S.; Vocke, D.C.; Kiliç, R.; Sarikoç, A.; Piñol, R.; Hagl, S.; Lang, S.; et al. Inflammatory regulation of extracellular matrix remodeling in calcific aortic valve stenosis. Cardiovasc. Pathol. 2005, 14, 80–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Helske, S.; Syväranta, S.; Lindstedt, K.A.; Lappalainen, J.; Oörni, K.; Mäyränpää, M.I.; Lommi, J.; Turto, H.; Werkkala, K.; Kupari, M.; et al. Increased expression of elastolytic cathepsins S, K, and V and their inhibitor cystatin C in stenotic aortic valves. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2006, 26, 1791–1798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  101. Latif, N.; Sarathchandra, P.; Taylor, P.M.; Antoniw, J.; Yacoub, M.H. Localization and pattern of expression of extracellular matrix components in human heart valves. J. Heart Valve Dis. 2005, 14, 218–227. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  102. Hutson, H.N.; Marohl, T.; Anderson, M.; Eliceiri, K.; Campagnola, P.; Masters, K.S. Calcific Aortic Valve Disease Is Associated with Layer-Specific Alterations in Collagen Architecture. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0163858. [Google Scholar]
  103. Archer, G.T.; Elhawaz, A.; Barker, N.; Fidock, B.; Rothman, A.; van der Geest, R.J.; Hose, R.; Briffa, N.; Hall, I.R.; Grech, E.; et al. Validation of four-dimensional flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance for aortic stenosis assessment. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 10569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Ali, A.; Patel, A.; Ali, Z.; Abu-Omar, Y.; Saeed, A.; Athanasiou, T.; Pepper, J. Enhanced left ventricular mass regression after aortic valve replacement in patients with aortic stenosis is associated with improved long-term survival. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2011, 142, 285–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  105. Binter, C.; Gotschy, A.; Sündermann, S.H.; Frank, M.; Tanner, F.C.; Lüscher, T.F.; Manka, R.; Kozerke, S. Turbulent Kinetic Energy Assessed by Multipoint 4-Dimensional Flow Magnetic Resonance Imaging Provides Additional Information Relative to Echocardiography for the Determination of Aortic Stenosis Severity. Circ. Cardiovasc. Imaging 2017, 10, e005486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  106. Von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff, F.; Karunaharamoorthy, A.; Trauzeddel, R.F.; Barker, A.J.; Blaszczyk, E.; Markl, M.; Schulz-Menger, J. Evaluation of Aortic Blood Flow and Wall Shear Stress in Aortic Stenosis and Its Association with Left Ventricular Remodeling. Circ. Cardiovasc. Imaging 2016, 9, e004038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  107. Can Ooij, P.; Markl, M.; Collins, J.D.; Carr, J.C.; Rigsby, C.; Bonow, R.O.; Malaisrie, S.C.; McCarthy, P.M.; Fedak, P.W.M.; Barker, A.J. Aortic Valve Stenosis Alters Expression of Regional Aortic Wall Shear Stress: New Insights from a 4-Dimensional Flow Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study of 571 Subjects. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2017, 6, e005959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Biomedicines 10 01317 g001 550
Figure 1. Diagrammatic representation of healthy aortic valve in closed and open state and a diseased aortic valve in closed and open state.
Figure 1. Diagrammatic representation of healthy aortic valve in closed and open state and a diseased aortic valve in closed and open state.
Biomedicines 10 01317 g001
Biomedicines 10 01317 g002 550
Figure 2. Diagrammatic representation of the coronary leaflets and a leaflet in cross-section showing the three layers of the aortic valve.
Figure 2. Diagrammatic representation of the coronary leaflets and a leaflet in cross-section showing the three layers of the aortic valve.
Biomedicines 10 01317 g002
Biomedicines 10 01317 g003 550
Figure 3. An aortic valve leaflet comprises an extracellular matrix that is organised into three layers; the ventricularis is on the ventricular side, the fibrosa is on the aortic side and the spongiosa is sandwiched in between these two layers. Valvular endothelial cells (VECs) line the ventricularis and fibrosa. Valvular interstitial cells (VICs) are found in all the layers. The aortic valve is exposed to a complex and harsh environment; the ventricularis side is exposed to laminar flow and shear stress, whereas the fibrosa side is exposed to oscillatory flow patterns and lower shear stresses.
Figure 3. An aortic valve leaflet comprises an extracellular matrix that is organised into three layers; the ventricularis is on the ventricular side, the fibrosa is on the aortic side and the spongiosa is sandwiched in between these two layers. Valvular endothelial cells (VECs) line the ventricularis and fibrosa. Valvular interstitial cells (VICs) are found in all the layers. The aortic valve is exposed to a complex and harsh environment; the ventricularis side is exposed to laminar flow and shear stress, whereas the fibrosa side is exposed to oscillatory flow patterns and lower shear stresses.
Biomedicines 10 01317 g003
Biomedicines 10 01317 g004 550
Figure 4. Cellular, molecular, and inflammatory cascades in CAVD. Figure reproduced with permission from Alushi et al. [26].
Figure 4. Cellular, molecular, and inflammatory cascades in CAVD. Figure reproduced with permission from Alushi et al. [26].
Biomedicines 10 01317 g004
Table
Table 1. Ongoing clinical trials targeting molecular pathways involving patients with calcific aortic valve disease (CAVD).
Table 1. Ongoing clinical trials targeting molecular pathways involving patients with calcific aortic valve disease (CAVD).
Study Name and NCT
Identifier		Principal Investigator and
Institution		Pharmacological Target and
Treatment Arms		Recruitment
Status
A study evaluating the effects of Ataciguat (HMR1766) on aortic valve calcification (CAVS) NCT02481258Jordan D Miller; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United StatesNitric oxide-independent soluble guanylate cyclase activator
Ataciguat (HMR1766) 200 mg daily for 12 months vs. placebo		Completed, results awaited
Effect of PCSK9 inhibitors on calcific aortic valve disease (EPISODE) NCT04968509Zhijian Wang; Beijing Anzhen Hospital, ChinaPCSK9 inhibitors (lipid lowering)
140 mg PCSK9 inhibitors (140 mg Evolocumab or Alirocumab subcutaneously every two weeks and conventional lipid lowering therapy (Atorvastatin 40–80 mg or Rosuvastatin 20–40 mg or Atorvastatin 20 mg+ Ezetimibe 10 mg or Rosuvastatin 10 mg+ Ezetimibe 10 mg vs. Conventional lipid-lowering therapy (Atorvastatin 40–80 mg or Rosuvastatin 20–40 mg or Atorvastatin 20 mg+ Ezetimibe 10 mg or Rosuvastatin 10 mg+ Ezetimibe)		Recruiting
A Study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of DA-1229 (Evogliptin) in patients with calcific aortic valve disease with mild to moderate stenosis (EVOID-AS) NCT05143177REDNVIA Co., Ltd.DA-1229 anti-diabetic
Three arm study where patients will receive one of the three treatments orally once daily for period of 104 weeks; DA-1229 5 mg once vs. GroupDA-1229 10 mg vs. Placebo 		Not yet recruiting
Colchicine and Inflammation in Aortic Stenosis (CHIANTI)
NCT05162742		Radboud University Medical CentreColchicine vs. placeboNot yet recruiting
Slower progress of calcification with Vitamin K2 (SLOW) NCT04429035First Department of Cardiology, University of Athens Athens, Attiki, Greece
Hippokration Hospital 1st Department of Cardiology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Medical School Athens, Attiki, Greece		Dietary Supplement: Vitamin K2 vs. Dietary Supplement: PlaceboRecruiting
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hanna, L.; Armour, C.; Xu, X.Y.; Gibbs, R. The Haemodynamic and Pathophysiological Mechanisms of Calcific Aortic Valve Disease. Biomedicines 2022, 10, 1317. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10061317

AMA Style

Hanna L, Armour C, Xu XY, Gibbs R. The Haemodynamic and Pathophysiological Mechanisms of Calcific Aortic Valve Disease. Biomedicines. 2022; 10(6):1317. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10061317

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hanna, Lydia, Chlöe Armour, Xiao Yun Xu, and Richard Gibbs. 2022. "The Haemodynamic and Pathophysiological Mechanisms of Calcific Aortic Valve Disease" Biomedicines 10, no. 6: 1317. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10061317

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop