Next Article in Journal
Protective Effect of Fustin against Huntington’s Disease in 3-Nitropropionic Treated Rats via Downregulation of Oxidative Stress and Alteration in Neurotransmitters and Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor Activity
Next Article in Special Issue
Prostate Cancer: From Molecular Imaging to Immunological and Target Therapies
Previous Article in Journal
The Long-Term Effects of Prenatal Hypoxia on Coronary Artery Function of the Male and Female Offspring
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Role of [18F]F-Choline PET/CT in the Initial Management and Outcome Prediction of Prostate Cancer: A Real-World Experience from a Multidisciplinary Approach
 
 
Review
Peer-Review Record

Pharmacological Optimization of PSMA-Based Radioligand Therapy

Biomedicines 2022, 10(12), 3020; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10123020
by Suzanne van der Gaag 1,2, Imke H. Bartelink 2,3, André N. Vis 4, George L. Burchell 5, Daniela E. Oprea-Lager 1,2 and Harry Hendrikse 1,2,*
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Biomedicines 2022, 10(12), 3020; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10123020
Submission received: 1 September 2022 / Revised: 9 November 2022 / Accepted: 18 November 2022 / Published: 23 November 2022

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Authors should be congratulated for their great work. The topic is interesting and challenging. The use of PSMA ligand therapy represents an innovation in PCa management. The manuscript is well-written and easily readable, the methodology is robust and the figures are particularly clear. The manuscript is suitable for publication.

 

 

Author Response

See attached file. 

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

 

 This review presents a review of literature related to PSMA-based radioligand therapy; what is known and how could it be improved. The topic is of interest to clinicians. 617 Lu-PSMA has been recently approved by FDA for advanced CRPC and it shows promise in improving the survival of patients that have very limited effective treatment options available. It is of interest to summarize what is known and where improvements in the treatment regimen can be done to personalize the treatment and provide the best treatment option for each patient. 

This review could be significantly improved by better organization/flow of the information and fully up-to-day results inclusion. Moreover, focusing on who published the results (names listed at the beginning of sentences) than on the results themselves and their importance makes it harder to make a more comprehensive picture of the current knowledge. 

The part that focuses on potential combination therapies is underdeveloped. For example, PARPi, and GR are introduced as potential targets for combinations, but the publications included do not support these stipulations. The paragraph focusing on AR and PI3K cross talk has no data/information about experiments using the combination of RTL and targeting these pathways. 

 

Other comments:

  • The review would benefit from English editing. For example, sentences: “Besides, in some cases no PSA change is found, but on imaging radiographic progression has shown [60].” and “Various strategies have been investigated for the management of adverse events, among which ice packs, Botox injections and glutamate tablets for protection of salivary glands, mannitol infusion as a osmotic agent and PSMA-inhibitor 2-PMPA for kidney pro-tection and spaglumic acid eye drops for prevention of dry eyes [21,29,73,95,140,144-147].”
  • It seems that some numbers might be missing from the following sentence: “The upregulation of PSMA found in cells for enzalutamide, abiraterone, bicatulamide and dutasteride was 1.9-7.4-, 1.5-5-, 4.2- and 2.4-4.6-fold respectively [62-67]. 
  • Please check that references 2-4 are correct ones.
  • The statement is made that “No limitations on date or language were applied in the search, while it is also stated that “ The timeframe within the databases was from inception to 12th of March 2022.”

 

 

Author Response

See attached file

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop