Next Article in Journal
Red Cell Distribution Width and Mortality in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Next Article in Special Issue
The Current State of Treatment and Future Directions in Cutaneous Malignant Melanoma
Previous Article in Journal
Co-Entrapment of Sorafenib and Cisplatin Drugs and iRGD Tumour Homing Peptide by Poly[ε-caprolactone-co-(12-hydroxystearate)] Copolymer
Previous Article in Special Issue
Posttranslational Modifications in PD-L1 Turnover and Function: From Cradle to Grave
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Biomedicines
Volume 10
Issue 1
10.3390/biomedicines10010044
biomedicines-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Restoring the Balance between Pro-Inflammatory and Anti-Inflammatory Cytokines in the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis: New Insights from Animal Models

by
Adrienn Markovics
1,
Ken S. Rosenthal
2,3,
Katalin Mikecz
1,
Roy E. Carambula
4,
Jason C. Ciemielewski
4 and
Daniel H. Zimmerman
4,*
1
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL 60612, USA
2
Department of Basic Sciences, Augusta University/University of Georgia Medical Partnership, Athens, GA 30602, USA
3
Department of Integrative Medical Sciences, NE Ohio Medical University, Rootstown, OH 44272, USA
4
CEL-SCI Corporation, Vienna, VA 22182, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biomedicines 2022, 10(1), 44; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10010044
Submission received: 23 November 2021 / Revised: 17 December 2021 / Accepted: 23 December 2021 / Published: 26 December 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue State-of-the-Art Immunology and Immunotherapy in USA)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and other autoimmune inflammatory diseases are examples of imbalances within the immune system (disrupted homeostasis) that arise from the effects of an accumulation of environmental and habitual insults over a lifetime, combined with genetic predispositions. This review compares current immunotherapies—(1) disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and (2) Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors (jakinibs)—to a newer approach—(3) therapeutic vaccines (using the LEAPS vaccine approach). The Ligand Epitope Antigen Presentation System (LEAPS) therapies are capable of inhibiting ongoing disease progression in animal models. Whereas DMARDs ablate or inhibit specific proinflammatory cytokines or cells and jakinibs inhibit the receptor activation cascade for expression of proinflammatory cytokines, the LEAPS therapeutic vaccines specifically modulate the ongoing antigen-specific, disease-driving, proinflammatory T memory cell responses. This decreases disease presentation and changes the cytokine conversation to decrease the expression of inflammatory cytokines (IL-17, IL-1(α or β), IL-6, IFN-γ, TNF-α) while increasing the expression of regulatory cytokines (IL-4, IL-10, TGF-β). This review refocuses the purpose of therapy for RA towards rebalancing the immune system rather than compromising specific components to stop disease. This review is intended to be thought provoking and look forward towards new therapeutic modalities rather than present a final definitive report.

1. From Homeostasis to Autoimmunity

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and other autoimmune inflammatory diseases are examples of imbalances within the immune system (disrupted homeostasis) that arise from the effects of an accumulation of environmental and habitual insults over a lifetime, combined with genetic predispositions. The initial insults that lead to RA are thought to often originate in the lung and are connected with smoking. Lungs are constantly exposed to insults due to infections, injury, and inhalants, dust, silica, asbestos, and especially tobacco smoke [1,2,3]. In addition, bacterial infections in the oropharynx, leading to gingivitis or periodontal disease, are considered a possible key early factor (see reviews) [1,4,5,6,7]. The inflammatory responses that drive RA usually originate with autoimmune responses against normal, modified or immuno-mimetics of self-proteins that are often found within skeletal joints. Individuals may be genetically prone to or acquire an enhanced systemic inflammatory state due to infectious, metabolic, or other challenges, which are often related to the immunological maintenance of the gut microbiome. The accumulation of inflammatory insults over a lifetime generates such a state, which has been termed ”inflammaging” [8].

2. Post-Translational Modification and Its Role in Autoimmunity

Tobacco smoking and other challenges promote the activation of the enzyme peptidyl arginine deiminase (PADI, especially PADI-2 and PADI-4) in the lung and elsewhere. This enzyme converts arginine residues in proteins to citrulline in situ in a process called citrullination. Such post-translational modifications (PTM) can alter the immunogenicity of any protein containing that residue and create neo-epitopes, leading to the development of autoimmunity. Citrullinated vimentin, proteoglycan (PG), fibrin, and collagen are commonly found in the skeletal joints of RA patients [2]. Another PTM seen in RA involves lysine residues. Other in situ PTMs, such as on serine and threonine, alter the immunogenicity of other self-proteins and are being observed in a growing number of autoimmune diseases [1,2,3,9,10,11,12]. On an important note, PTM can affect cellular function and enhance the activation of neutrophils and macrophages, leading to the release of destructive enzymes from the recruited cells, such as matrix metalloproteinases (MMP, especially MMP-1, MMP-13), which are collagenases that can cause bone and cartilage destruction [13].

3. Role of Cytokines, Cells, and Their Interplay in Disrupting Immune Homeostasis

In the presence of systemic inflammation, potentially exacerbated by trauma, infection or other inflammatory trigger, PTM proteins can initiate autoimmune responses and alter the normal balance of immunity. Figure 1A represents the normal balance in immune pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory responses that promote immune homeostasis. The various actors include cells (T, and B cells, macrophages, dendritic cells (DC), other blood cells) and pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines that affect the regulation of responses to self (auto)antigen.
As shown in Figure 1B, the disruption of immune homeostasis resulting in autoimmunity and RA can occur in an individual at risk of RA due to environmental, systemic, or genetic factors. The activation of inflammatory responses by exposure to the pathogen-associated molecular pattern molecules (PAMPs) of microbes or damage-associated molecular pattern molecules (DAMPs) induced by tissue damage or trauma can activate processes that can initiate inflammatory responses to the PTM self-(auto)antigens that drive RA. These processes are driven by T helper (Th)1 and/or Th17 pro-inflammatory responses.
DCs process phagocytosed proteins, including citrullinated proteins if present, into peptides that then occupy major histocompatibility class (MHC I or MHC II) molecules and then activate the naive T cells that can recognize those peptide antigens. Depending on the cytokines produced by the DC, antigen-specific Th1 or Th17 pro-inflammatory T cells are activated [6,14]. These cell types are defined by different transcription factors (TFs) and the cytokines that they produce, setting up cytokine conversations. As summarized by Medzhitov, these conversations may include increases in some and decreases in other cytokines [15]. The cytokine conversation of Th17 T cells includes interleukins (IL), such as IL-17, IL-22 and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, which can act on epithelial cells, neutrophils, and other cells, promoting epithelial cell functions, antimicrobial activities, wound healing or inflammation [1,16]. Activated neutrophils can cause and extend these inflammatory reactions. The cytokine conversation of Th1 cells includes interferon (IFN)-γ, IL-2, and TNF-β which has a broader role in activating CD4 and CD8 T cells, B cells, promoting immunoglobulin class switch to IgG and, importantly, the development of M1 inflammatory macrophages. M1 macrophages have increased capacity for producing reactive oxygen species, acute phase inflammatory cytokines (IL-1, TNF-α, IL-6) and they exhibit an enhanced antigen-presenting capacity [6,7,17]. Activated B cells produce antibodies to the RA autoantigens and are also potent activators of antigen-specific T cells in RA. B cells express the same immunoglobulin on their cell surfaces that they produce and secrete as the B cell receptor (BCR). This molecule, the BCR, is important for activating B cells and also promotes the phagocytosis of its corresponding antigen. The internalized antigen is then processed, and its peptides become the dominant peptide on MHC II molecules that are presented to and activate CD4 T cells, which can ultimately amplify the immune response to the antigen [5,18].
Normally, the B cells and T cells that elicit autoimmune responses are either eliminated in the bone marrow and thymus, respectively (central tolerance), or controlled by regulatory responses (peripheral tolerance). Peripheral tolerance is mediated by regulatory T cells (Tregs) and induced T regs (iTregs), whose cytokine conversations involve IL-10 and/or tumor growth factor (TGF)-β. The iTregs are generated primarily from peripheral Th17 or other Th cells in the presence of high levels of IL-10 or TGF-β. Other cells, including macrophages and myeloid suppressor cells, can also produce these regulatory cytokines to control inappropriate or inflammatory responses. The tolerance that these cells impose can be overridden by infections and other challenges that disrupt the homeostatic balance and lead to the production of large amounts of acute phase cytokines (IL-1, IL-6, TNF-α), allowing responses to the microbial or modified antigens that mimic human antigens to initiate autoimmune responses [5,19,20].

4. Two Different Animal Models of Arthritis

Animal models of RA, including collagen-induced arthritis (CIA), proteoglycan (PG) induced-arthritis (PGIA), and recombinant human PG G1 (rhG1) domain-induced arthritis (GIA) models, which are utilized in the studies described below, are useful for studying the disease and potential treatments. Autoimmune responses to RA-relevant antigens are initiated by immunization with collagen, PG, or immuno-dominant domains from these molecules in the presence of potent adjuvants that override tolerance. In the CIA model (Figure 2A), genetically susceptible male mice are immunized with type II bovine collagen emulsified in complete Freund’s adjuvant and then receive a boost injection 21 days later [21]. Arthritis develops 26–35 days after the initial collagen injection. In the PGIA model (Figure 2B), genetically susceptible (older female) mice are immunized with human cartilage PG in dimethyl-dioctadecyl-ammonium bromide (DDA) adjuvant three times with 21 day intervals, as described elsewhere [22,23]. In the related GIA model, mice are immunized with the recombinant first globular (G1) domain of human PG, also with the same adjuvant. The methods for disease induction (route, adjuvants, etc., used) are important in determining whether the disease has a Th1 (IFN-γ-dominated) or Th17 (IL-17-dominated plus TNF-α) phenotype with the involvement of the corresponding signature cytokines [24,25,26,27]. Characteristically, the CIA model is driven by Th17 pro-inflammatory cytokine conversations, while the PGIA/GIA model, used in the subsequently described studies, is driven by Th1 pro-inflammatory cytokine conversations. Similarly, it is likely that human joint disease, such as RA, is driven by either a Th1 or Th17 cytokine conversation. Many of the genetic predispositions seen in humans are also present in these and other animal models; see the review by Kurko et al. [28].
The CIA (Th17 with IL-17) and PGIA/GIA (Th1 with IFN-γ) mouse models of arthritis were used to explore the potential therapeutic effects of CEL-2000 (J-C-II254) and CEL-4000 (DerG-PG70) Ligand Epitope Antigen Presentation System (LEAPS) vaccines, respectively [3,27,29,30,31]. CEL-2000 [27] attaches a peptide from human collagen to the J-immune cell-binding ligand (ICBL) (J-C-II254) and CEL-4000 attaches a peptide from proteoglycan to the DerG-ICBL (DerG-PG70) [29,30].
The LEAPS vaccine therapy was developed as an alternative approach for the systemic ablation or inhibition of the immune responses involved in RA. Treatment with LEAPS promotes an antigen-specific modulation of cytokine conversations that reduces inflammation. LEAPS vaccines are peptides that can be designed to elicit an antigen-directed Th1 or Th2/Treg cytokine conversation depending upon the LEAPS ICBL that is attached to a disease-related antigenic peptide. The J-ICBL activates DCs, which produce IL-12 to promote IFN-γ and Th1 cytokine conversations and responses, whereas the DerG-ICBL acts on CD4 T cells to promote Th2 and Treg cytokine conversations and responses. By promoting the appropriate antigen-specific cytokine conversations and T cell responses, immunization with J-LEAPS vaccines can elicit anti-viral and anti-tumor responses [32,33] and also have the potential to modulate Th17 inflammatory responses [27]. The induction of IFN-γ and Th1 CD4 T cells activates anti-viral and anti-tumor cytotoxic T cells but can also downregulate Th17 responses. The DerG-LEAPS vaccines elicit antibody responses [34,35] and have the potential to modulate Th1 responses.
As shown in Figure 3A, the application of LEAPS immunotherapy to disease-bearing mice in the animal models of RA promotes a return to a balanced immune response by promoting an increase in anti-inflammatory cytokines and a decrease in pro-inflammatory cytokines [3,29,30].
While the cartoon only shows a limited number of pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines as examples, the cytokine conversations in RA include IL-1 (α or β), IL-6, IL-17A (or IL-17F), IL-23, TNF-α, and IFN-γ for inflammatory. IL-23 is not included in the figure but does promote memory Th17 proinflammatory responses. And IL-4, IL-10 and TGF-β for anti-inflammatory cytokines. IFN-γ is unique as it can exhibit both pro- and anti-inflammatory roles. IFN-γ can activate inflammatory macrophages and T cells but also inhibits neutrophils and Th17 responses [17,24,36,37,38]. The LEAPS vaccines are presented as a more recent example of developing therapeutic vaccines in these same models, which modulate both inflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines as part of their action [3]. By modifying the cytokine conversation, the LEAPS immunotherapy is a better approach to restore immune homeostasis than single-cytokine ablation. As Smolen et al. [2] indicate, the cytokines produced by T cells may have both pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory activities depending upon the other cytokines within the “conversation” and the cell and tissue that is affected. Other articles on the LEAPS technology can be found at the following references: [3,32,39,40].

5. Current and Older Therapeutic Approaches for RA

The current therapy for RA consists of either the treatment of symptomatology or the inhibition or ablation of the components of the inflammatory immune response (Table 1). Neither of these approaches address the imbalance of the antigen-specific immune response that is the root cause of the disease. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are the first line of treatment used to alleviate pain and inflammation. Older ablative treatments with corticosteroid, methotrexate, and similar drugs can inhibit inflammation and are effective for many patients. The newer therapies, as shown in Table 1, are more selective in their inhibition of specific mediators of inflammation and can be organized into three main therapeutic approaches, as shown in Table 1 and Figure 3.

6. Grouping of the Therapeutic Approaches

The three groups of therapies shown in Table 1 are presented with the immunological target of the treatment, the cytokine(s) that are affected and whether their amount is increased or decreased and examples of specific drugs for that type of treatment. The information in Table 1 is presented as a “heat map” to assist in revealing trends and patterns. Highlighted in red are the five pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-1(α or β), IL-6, IL-17, IFN-γ, and TNF-α), in Blue are two anti-inflammatory cytokines (IL-4 and IL-10) and in gray are IL-2, since it seems to play a key regulatory role, and IL-12p70, which promotes IFN-γ responses, which can be pro-inflammatory or anti-inflammatory.
The Group I therapies focus on the cytokine-secreting, antigen-specific T cells, i.e., therapeutic vaccines, but not individual cytokines per se. These treatments promote a modification of the cytokine conversation that affects both anti-inflammatory cytokines and pro-inflammatory cytokines, focusing upstream on the source of the response, the memory T cell.
Group II therapies focus on ablations of individual cytokine action by neutralizing the cytokine or blocking its receptor. Neutralizing monoclonal antibodies or receptor antagonists prevent the action of individual acute phase cytokines, TNF-α, IL-1, IL-6 or mediators of Th17 responses, such as IL-23 or IL-17. Alternatively, antibodies to surface differentiation antigens (CDs) are used to eliminate or inhibit specific cells and their functions. Antibody to CD20 lessens the number of B cells to reduce these RA-promoting, antigen-presenting cells. These therapeutic products, monoclonal antibodies, soluble receptor antagonists, agonists, or modified soluble receptors are collectively referred to as Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (DMARDs).
The first developed and therefore oldest of the group (II) cytokine-focused therapies are the biological response modifiers (BRM), such as neutralizing monoclonal antibodies, solubilized receptors (sR) and modified soluble receptors (msR) (e.g., for IL-2R: MR-IL-2). As monoclonal antibodies, they are highly specific for the antigenic epitopes present on the target molecules [83,84] and act extracellularly. However, it should be noted that some protein subunits are shared between several cytokines, such as IL-12p40 for both IL-12 and IL-23 cytokines, so that multiple cytokines and their consequences may be affected [85,86]. Similarly, monoclonal antibodies directed towards cell surface markers (e.g., CD20) (other than cytokine receptors), may affect several different types of cells expressing that marker [48,84]. The Group II agents are often administered by injection as an intravenous (IV) bolus or infusion over time because of their much larger sizes (e.g., about 150 kDa for monoclonal antibodies).
Group III therapies focus on JAK inhibitors (abbreviated to jakinhib-1, -2 or -3, etc.) which target the JAK/STAT transduction of receptor signals, which activates the transcription and production of one or more cytokines, including not only the pro-inflammatory cytokines, but also potentially therapeutic anti-inflammatory cytokines, notably IL-2, IL-4, IL-10, and TGF-β [64,66,68,82,86,87,88,89]. The heat map is especially useful since specific drugs may have more activity towards one JAK than another, e.g., JAK3>1 family (for tofacitinib and for peficitinib); JAK2,1>TYK2 family (for baricitinib and for ruxolitinib); and JAK 1>JAK2 family (for filgotinib and for upadacitinib). TGF-β was not considered in this analysis as it is not involved in the JAK/STAT pathway.

7. Application of Animal Models in the Evaluation of Potential or Actual Therapies

RA and many other autoimmune diseases are driven by T cell responses directed towards specific epitopes from different proteins and possibly mediated by different T cell cytokine conversations. This situation can be seen for the two models of RA depicted in Figure 2 in which the CIA model is driven by Th17 responses to collagen and the PGIA/GIA model is driven by Th1 responses to proteoglycan. As in humans, the nature of the response is determined by multiple factors including genetics (for the mouse, it would be strain and breed [28]), diet, nature of antigen administration and level of systemic inflammation (possibly mimicked by the adjuvant). Similarly, other autoimmune conditions and their respective models, including uveitis, multiple sclerosis (MS), and autoimmune Type 1 diabetes (T1D) [3,24,25,26,90], are initiated by antigen responses and driven by the Th17 and/or Th1 pro-inflammatory immune responses, some of which also involve the tissues of bone/cartilage of the joints, as seen in these two RA models.
In as much as many of the therapies for RA and other autoimmune and inflammatory diseases target the cytokines involved in the process, it is important to have an overview of the consequences of their inhibition or ablation. The depictions in the figures simplify the disease-driving cytokine conversations and the collateral effects that they induce. Many of the individual cytokines have multiple activities depending upon the cell type and the other cytokines in the conversation, as was mentioned for IFN-γ, for which ablation in some animal models for RA, diabetes and multiple sclerosis actually exacerbated disease [36]. Similarly, several cytokine receptors or their subunits bind multiple cytokines and block the receptor subunit or its transduction cascade, or the cytokine itself can have diverse consequences. Additionally, when considering T cell responses, it is important to note that multiple cytokines of different types can be secreted by a single T or other cell type [91]. These cytokines may be produced in multiple locations which may be distant from the initial trigger and have different effects depending upon the target tissue. The actual damage may be inflicted in a joint, skin, eye, pancreas or nervous tissue [1,2,3]. Immunopathogenesis can present as erythema, increased temperature, vascular permeability, swelling, pain, itching and, importantly, the recruitment of innate immune cell types such as eosinophils, neutrophils, basophils, and monocytes [2]. A further note is that since cytokine actions can have multiple effects, there can be a bystander effect [92,93,94], be it good or harmful, on adjacent tissues, depending on whether they are pro-inflammatory or anti-inflammatory. Relevant to RA, pro-inflammatory cytokines can cause other cells to release enzymes such as PADI-2 and PADI-4 (which generate neo-antigens) or more destructive enzymes such as MMP-1, MMP-13, and other collagenases that break down proteins in the bone or cartilage tissue, leading to joint destruction. This effect creates and releases new antigens which some experts consider to be the process called “epitope spreading” [2,95,96,97].

8. Comparisons of LEAPS, Monoablative, and Jakinib Therapies

Unlike the ablative therapy alluded to above, the LEAPS peptide therapeutic vaccines have an immunomodulatory effect on the T cells driving the disease, as illustrated in Figure 3A,B. In so doing, the LEAPS peptides affect the entire cytokine conversation, increasing the expression of some and decreasing other cytokines to return immunobalance, rather than acting on a single cytokine [3,27,29,30,31].
The monoablative therapies (shown in Figure 3C,D) using a neutralizing monoclonal antibody or receptor-antagonist to specifically block the action of one of the disease-associated cytokines after secretion and not its synthesis. The targets for these therapies include IL-1β, IL-6, IL-17A, IL-23, IL-12, and TNF-α and, under certain circumstances, IFN-γ. These monoablation therapies only indirectly affect other pro-inflammatory cytokines and do not upregulate anti-inflammatory cytokines to rebalance the cytokine conversation. More recently, it has been reported that immunotherapies based on IL-6 [98] or IL-17 [16] may be more efficacious for RA [2,99] than the original TNF-α antagonists exemplified by Adalimumab (Humira®) [100,101], Etanercept (Enbrel®) [102,103], or Infliximab (Remicade®) [102,103,104,105,106].
Targeting these individual cytokines also suppresses beneficial responses, including antimicrobial responses, that can impact GI immunology and antimicrobial protections. For example, the inhibition of TNF-α, IFN-γ, IL-17, IL-23, or IL-12 increases the risk of intracellular bacterial and fungal infections [107,108,109].
The third group (III) of therapies (Table 1, Figure 3E–G) are the jakinibs, which act by inhibiting specific receptor-associated JAK/STAT tyrosine kinases, ultimately inhibiting the synthesis and secretion of multiple cytokines (multi-ablative therapy) that are activated by the specific JAK cascade. The jakinibs are small-molecule (~300Da) inhibitors acting on the Janus kinases JAK1, JAK2, JAK3 or TYK2 and have the major advantage of being taken orally [63]. The JAK enzymes most often work in pairs as homo- or heterocomplexes activating STAT molecules to create transcriptional activators and promote the expression of groups of cytokine and other genes. JAK activation or inhibition also influences the expression of different cell surface receptors, including CD4, CD80 and CD86 on T, B and other cells and their associated immune responses [65]. The expression of some JAK enzymes is more restricted to certain cell types than others, such as JAK3 for immune system cells such as B, T, and NK cells. This is a therapeutic advantage.
As can be seen in Table 1, there are at least five different jakinibs approved for RA treatment in the USA, Europe, or Japan and several others are under investigation, each unique in terms of the molecule’s binding preference for its particular cognate JAK or JAK-associated molecule. Different manifestations of treatment occur depending on the relative selectivity of binding and whether it is reversible or irreversible. The representative jakinhibs are shown as different-colored (red, blue and orange) hexagonal shapes in Figure 3 for the three examples of jakinibs that downregulate inflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines. Jakinib A (Figure 3E red hexagon) has activity which is JAK 3>1 and downregulates the expression of IL-6, IL-17, IFN-γ, TNF-α, IL-4, and IL-10. Jakinib B (Figure 3F blue hexagon) is a JAK 2>1 inhibitor downregulating IL-6, IL-17, IFN-γ, TNF-α, and IL-10. Jakinib C (Figure 3G orange hexagon) is a JAK 1>2 inhibitor downregulating IL-1, IL-6, IL-17, IFN-γ, TNF-α, IL-4, and IL-10. It should be noted that a jakinib specific for only JAK2 cannot be used since the inhibition of JAK2/STAT is associated with lethality early in life [63,77].
As discussed by Lin et al. [77], the specificity for the different targets of JAK classes (1,2,3 and TYK2) and the magnitude of inhibition of each can result in a spill-over of JAK inhibition, affecting multiple activities. This can result in the inhibition of expression of beneficial and anti-inflammatory cytokines, such as IL-10 (controlled by the JAK1/TYK2 pair), IL-12p70 (controlled by the JAK2/TYK2 pair), GM-CSF (controlled by the JAK2 pair), or IFN-γ (controlled by the JAK1/JAK2 pair) by a particular jakinib [64,66,68,69,82,86,88,89,110]. Likewise, the ablative effects of monoclonal antibodies and soluble cytokine receptor antagonists may extend beyond their action on the specific cytokine target to also affect cell proliferation and surface molecule expression [47,57].
Although TNF-α, IL-1, and IL-17 are major targets for monoablation therapy, they are not directly affected by the jakinibs. However, they may be indirectly affected by the inhibition of expression of other cytokines that are supposedly not involved in the JAK signaling pathway; for example, IL-17 is affected indirectly by several of these jakinibs [66,67,77]. Similarly, an indirect effect of jakinibs may also promote the expression of some anti-inflammatory cytokines. The combination therapy targeting several cytokines, as possibly seen for the JAK inhibitors, may be effective, although this is still being debated and new clinical studies will be needed [2,99,111,112].

9. More on LEAPS and Therapeutic Vaccines and Summary

The LEAPS therapy, the development of which started after the other treatments listed in Table 1, has the major advantages of being antigen specific and thus disease specific, and directed towards specific T cell responses to adjust the cytokine conversation. The treatment acts by upregulating the anti-inflammatory cytokine conversation while at same time modulating or downregulating the expression of pro-inflammatory or inflammatory cytokines. Pharmacologically, the LEAPS peptides are sized between the other two classes of therapeutics (3–4kDa) and are injected subcutaneously or intramuscularly, more like a vaccine instead of given as an intravenous bolus or infusion.
The choice of the LEAPS ICBL attached to the disease-related peptide allows the designing of a therapeutic that modulates different pro-inflammatory responses. As shown by Taylor et al., who used J-LEAPS conjugates of epitopes from herpes simplex virus (HSV) and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), the J-LEAPS peptides bind to precursors of mouse (bone marrow) or human (blood monocytes) DCs and promote their maturation to produce IL-12p70 and present the attached peptide to elicit antigen-specific protective responses, including the production of IFN-γ [113]. This Th1 cytokine conversation and involvement of both CD4 and CD8 T cells allowed the designing of both anti-viral and anti-tumor vaccines [32,33]. Similarly, CEL-2000, which attaches a collagen peptide to the J-LEAPS ICBL, upregulated IL-12p70, IFN-γ, and also IL-10 while downregulating TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-17A to stop the progression of ongoing disease in the CIA model [27]. LEAPS therapeutics incorporating the DerG peptide act directly on CD4 T cells to promote Th2 cytokine responses. CEL-4000 and a related LEAPS therapeutic, which attach the DerG LEAPS ICBL to peptides from proteoglycan [3,29,30], elicited antigen-specific responses to stop the progression of disease by acting on memory T cells, including those in the spleen, to increase the expression of anti-inflammatory IL-4, IL-10, and TGF-β cytokines and Treg numbers while decreasing the expression of pro-inflammatory IFN-γ and IL-17 in the PGIA/GIA models [29,30].
Immunomodulation as a therapy for inflammatory diseases, as demonstrated by the LEAPS vaccines, is a much newer approach than the DMARD or jakinib approaches. LEAPS vaccines have proven to be successful in representative animal models and J-LEAPS peptides have demonstrated activity with human cells [113] but have not been tested in humans. The genetic heterogeneity of the human population compared to research animals and an appropriate dosing regimen may pose potential challenges for the translation of LEAPS vaccine therapy from animal models to humans. As proposed in the work of Rosenthal et al. [114], the answer may be a customized therapy designed after testing the cytokine response of peripheral blood from patients upon challenge with a panel of representative autoantigenic peptides in a manner similar to the IFN-γ release assay (IGRA) for tuberculosis. The assay would uncover the disease-driving T-cell response for individual patients (Th1 or Th17) and allow the selection of the corresponding LEAPS ICBL and target antigen to incorporate into a customized therapy. For a Th1-driven disease, the LEAPS-4000 approach using the DerG-LEAPS ICBL would be appropriate, whereas, for a Th17, a LEAPS-2000 approach using the J-LEAPS ICBL would be appropriate.
The LEAPS approach derives benefits by addressing the underlying disease cause and not just being palliative or treating the symptoms of the disease. Rather than acting directly on pro-inflammatory cytokines, the LEAPS peptides act on DCs or T cells to modulate the ongoing disease-driving responses in an antigen-specific manner.
In conclusion, these examples of LEAPS immunomodulator peptides represent a new class of therapeutics for autoimmune inflammatory diseases that can be tailored to the disease-driving antigen(s) within an individual. This is in contrast to either of the ablation technologies that neutralize or block specific cytokines or block the JAK activation of gene expression for pro-inflammatory cytokines, with no consideration of affecting anti-inflammatory cytokines, and they do this in an antigen non-specific manner.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.H.Z., who prepared the outline, conceptualization of tables and figures and the first draft of text; Data curation, K.M., A.M. and R.E.C.; Formal analysis, D.H.Z., K.M., A.M. and K.S.R.; Funding acquisition, D.H.Z. and K.M; Investigation, D.H.Z., K.M., A.M., R.E.C., J.C.C. and K.S.R.; Methodology, D.H.Z., K.M., A.M. and K.S.R.; Project administration, D.H.Z. and K.M.; Resources, D.H.Z. and K.M.; Software, K.M., A.M., R.E.C. and J.C.C.; Supervision, D.H.Z. and K.M.; Validation, K.M., A.M., R.E.C., J.C.C. and K.S.R.; Visualization, D.H.Z., K.M., A.M., R.E.C., J.C.C. and K.S.R.; Writing—original draft, D.H.Z. with major follow-up assistance from A.M., K.S.R. and K.M.; Writing—review and editing, D.H.Z., K.M., A.M., R.E.C., J.C.C. and K.S.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Institute of Arthritis, Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS) of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) of USA under award number R44 AR063504-02A1 and R43 AR063504 for DH Zimmerman as well as by CEL-SCI Corporation; it was also supported under award numbers NIH/NIAMS R01 AR064206 and R01 AR062991 for K Mikecz at Rush University Medical Center.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge and thank Tibor Glant for his contributions to the understanding of the immunopathology of rheumatoid arthritis that allowed the development of CEL-4000 and related vaccine therapeutics. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health, CEL-SCI Corporation or Rush University Medical Center.

Conflicts of Interest

D.H.Z., R.E.C. and J.C.C. are employees of CEL-SCI, stockholders, and inventors of one or more LEAPS patents; D.H.Z. is also an officer of CEL-SCI. K.S.R. and K.M. are inventors of one or more LEAPS patents but have no other conflicts. A.M. has no conflict of interest to declare. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

Abbreviations

AS: ankylosing spondylitis; BCR: B cell receptor; BRM: biological response modifier; CD: cluster of differentiation; CIA: collagen-induced arthritis; DAMP: damage associated molecular pattern; DC: dendritic cells; DDA: dimethyl-dioctadecyl-ammonium; DMARDs: disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs; EPO: erythropoietin; G1: globular 1; G-CSF: granulocyte colony-stimulating factor; GIA: PG G1 domain-induced arthritis; GM-CSF: granulocyte–macrophage colony-stimulating factor; HC: healthy controls; HIV: human immunodeficiency virus; HSV: herpes simplex virus; ICBL: immune cell-binding ligand; IDO: indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase; IFN: interferon; IGRA: IFN-γ release assay; IL: interleukin; IP-10/CXCL10: interferon-inducible protein 10/C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 10; iTreg: induced regulatory T cell; IV: intravenous; JAK: janus kinase; KC/GRO: keratinocyte chemoattractant grow-regulated oncogenes; LEAPS: Ligand Epitope Antigen Presentation System; mAb: monoclonal antibody; MCP: monocyte chemoattractant protein; MDC: macrophage-derived chemokine; MHC: major histocompatibility class; MI: macrophage inflammatory protein; MMP: matrix metalloproteinases; MoDC: monocyte-derived dendritic cell; MS: multiple sclerosis; msR: modified soluble receptor; NSAID: non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug; PADI: peptidyl arginine deaminase; PAMP: pathogen-associated molecular pattern; pcJIA: polyarticular course juvenile idiopathic arthritis; pDC: plasmacytoid dendritic cell;, PG: proteo-glycan; PGIA: proteoglycan-induced arthritis; PSA: psoriatic arthritis; PTM: post-translational modifications; RA: rheumatoid arthritis; RANKL: receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand; rhG1: recombinant human PG G1; SCF: stem cell factor; sR: solubilized receptor; sRA: solubilized receptor antagonist; STAT: signal transducer and activator of transcription; T1D: type 1 diabetes; TF: transcription factors; TGF: tumor growth factor; Th: T helper; TNF: tumor necrosis factor; TPO: thrombopoietin; TRAP: tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase; Treg: regulatory T cell; TYK2: tyrosine kinase 2; UC: ulcerative colitis; XCL1: X-C motif chemokine ligand 1.

References

  1. McInnes, I.B.; Schett, G. The pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2011, 365, 2205–2219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Smolen, J.S.; Aletaha, D.; Barton, A.; Burmester, G.R.; Emery, P.; Firestein, G.S.; Kavanaugh, A.; McInnes, I.B.; Solomon, D.H.; Strand, V.; et al. Rheumatoid arthritis. Nat. Rev. Dis. Prim. 2018, 4, 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Rosenthal, K.S.; Mikecz, K.; Steiner, H.L.; Glant, T.T.; Finnegan, A.; Carambula, R.E.; Zimmerman, D.H.; Zimmerman, D.H. Rheumatoid arthritis vaccine therapies: Perspectives and lessons from therapeutic ligand epitope antigen presentation system vaccines for models of rheumatoid arthritis. Expert Rev. Vaccines 2015, 14, 891–908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Arleevskaya, M.; Takha, E.; Petrov, S.; Kazarian, G.; Novikov, A.; Larionova, R. Causal risk and protective factors in rheumatoid arthritis: A genetic update. J. Transl. Autoimmun. 2021, 4, 100119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Karmakar, U.; Vermeren, S. Crosstalk between B cells and Neutrophils in Rheumatoid Arthritis. Immunology 2021, 164, 689–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Möller, B.; Kollert, F.; Sculean, A.; Villiger, P.M. Infectious Triggers in Periodontitis and the Gut in Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA): A Complex Story About Association and Causality. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 1108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Firestein, G.S.; McInnes, I.B. Immunopathogenesis of Rheumatoid Arthritis. Immunity 2017, 46, 183–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Pawelec, T.F.A.L.G.; Cohen, A.K.A.A.; Witkowski, K.H.J.M. Immunology of Aging: The Birth of Inflammaging. Clin. Rev. Allergy Immunol. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Doyle, H.A.; Mamula, M.J. Autoantigenesis: The evolution of protein modifications in autoimmune disease. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 2012, 24, 112–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Mastrangelo, A.; Colasanti, T.; Barbati, C.; Pecani, A.; Sabatinelli, D.; Pendolino, M.; Truglia, S.; Massaro, L.; Mancini, R.; Miranda, F.; et al. The Role of Posttranslational Protein Modifications in Rheumatological Diseases: Focus on Rheumatoid Arthritis. J. Immunol. Res. 2015, 2015, 712490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Spinelli, F.R.; Pecani, A.; Conti, F.; Mancini, R.; Alessandri, C.; Valesini, G. Post-translational modifications in rheumatoid arthritis and atherosclerosis: Focus on citrullination and carbamylation. J. Int. Med. Res. 2016, 44, 81–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Burska, A.N.; Hunt, L.; Boissinot, M.; Strollo, R.; Ryan, B.J.; Vital, E.; Nissim, A.; Winyard, P.G.; Emery, P.; Ponchel, F. Autoantibodies to posttranslational modifications in rheumatoid arthritis. Mediators Inflamm. 2014, 2014, 492873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Van Venrooij, W.J.; Pruijn, G.J.M. How citrullination invaded rheumatoid arthritis research. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2014, 16, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Wehr, P.; Purvis, H.; Law, S.C.; Thomas, R. Dendritic cells, T cells and their interaction in rheumatoid arthritis. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 2019, 196, 12–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Medzhitov, R. The spectrum of inflammatory responses. Science 2021, 374, 1070–1075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. van den Berg, W.B.; McInnes, I.B. Th17 cells and IL-17 a--focus on immunopathogenesis and immunotherapeutics. Semin. Arthritis Rheum. 2013, 43, 158–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Green, D.S.; Young, H.A.; Valencia, J.C. Current prospects of type II interferon γ signaling & autoimmunity. J. Biol. Chem. 2017, 292, 13925–13933. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Wieczorek, M.; Abualrous, E.T.; Sticht, J.; Álvaro-Benito, M.; Stolzenberg, S.; Noé, F.; Freund, C. Major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I and MHC class II proteins: Conformational plasticity in antigen presentation. Front. Immunol. 2017, 8, 292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. Sakaguchi, S.; Powrie, F.; Ransohoff, R.M. Re-establishing immunological self-tolerance in autoimmune disease. Nat. Med. 2012, 18, 54–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Zeng, H.; Zhang, R.; Jin, B.; Chen, L. Type 1 regulatory T cells: A new mechanism of peripheral immune tolerance. Cell. Mol. Immunol. 2015, 12, 566–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  21. Pietrosimone, K.M.; Jin, M.; Liu, P. Collagen-Induced Arthritis: A model for Murine Autoimmune Arthritis. Biol. Protoc. 2015, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Glant, T.T.; Mikecz, K.; Arzoumanian, A.; Poole, A.R. Proteoglycan-induced arthritis in BALB/c mice. Clinical features and histopathology. Arthritis Rheum. 1987, 30, 201–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Glant, T.T.; Radacs, M.; Nagyeri, G.; Olasz, K.; Laszlo, A.; Boldizsar, F.; Hegyi, A.; Finnegan, A.; Mikecz, K. Proteoglycan-induced arthritis and recombinant human proteoglycan aggrecan G1 domain-induced arthritis in BALB/c mice resembling two subtypes of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2011, 63, 1312–1321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Rodeghero, R.; Cao, Y.; Olalekan, S.A.; Iwakua, Y.; Glant, T.T.; Finnegan, A. Location of CD4+ T cell priming regulates the differentiation of Th1 and Th17 cells and their contribution to arthritis. J. Immunol. 2013, 190, 5423–5435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Domingues, H.S.; Mues, M.; Lassmann, H.; Wekerle, H.; Krishnamoorthy, G. Functional and pathogenic differences of Th1 and Th17 cells in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e15531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Luger, D.; Silver, P.B.; Tang, J.; Cua, D.; Chen, Z.; Iwakura, Y.; Bowman, E.P.; Sgambellone, N.M.; Chan, C.-C.; Caspi, R.R. Either a Th17 or a Th1 effector response can drive autoimmunity: Conditions of disease induction affect dominant effector category. J. Exp. Med. 2008, 205, 799–810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zimmerman, D.H.; Taylor, P.; Bendele, A.; Carambula, R.; Duzant, Y.; Lowe, V.; O’Neill, S.P.; Talor, E.; Rosenthal, K.S. CEL-2000: A therapeutic vaccine for rheumatoid arthritis arrests disease development and alters serum cytokine/chemokine patterns in the bovine collagen type II induced arthritis in the DBA mouse model. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2010, 10, 412–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kurkó, J.; Besenyei, T.; Laki, J.; Glant, T.T.; Mikecz, K.; Szekanecz, Z. Genetics of Rheumatoid Arthritis—A Comprehensive Review. Clin. Rev. Allergy Immunol. 2013, 45, 170–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. Zimmerman, D.H.; Mikecz, K.; Markovics, A.; Carambula, R.E.; Ciemielewski, J.C.; Toth, D.M.; Glant, T.T.; Rosenthal, K.S. Vaccination by Two DerG LEAPS Conjugates Incorporating Distinct Proteoglycan (PG, Aggrecan) Epitopes Provides Therapy by Different Immune Mechanisms in a Mouse Model of Rheumatoid Arthritis. Vaccines 2021, 9, 448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Mikecz, K.; Glant, T.T.; Markovics, A.; Rosenthal, K.S.; Kurko, J.; Carambula, R.E.; Cress, S.; Steiner, H.L.; Zimmerman, D.H. An epitope-specific DerG-PG70 LEAPS vaccine modulates T cell responses and suppresses arthritis progression in two related murine models of rheumatoid arthritis. Vaccine 2017, 35, 4048–4056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Markovics, A.; Zimmerman, D.H.; Mikecz, K.; Rosenthal, K.S. Suppression of Arthritis by Immunomodulatory LEAPS Peptide Vaccines in Animal Models of Rheumatoid Arthritis. Int. J. Drug Dev. Res. 2021, 13, 9502. [Google Scholar]
  32. Rosenthal, K.S.; Taylor, P.; Zimmerman, D.H. J-LEAPS peptide and LEAPS dendritic cell vaccines. Microb. Biotechnol. 2012, 5, 203–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Rosenthal, K.S.; Stone, S.; Koski, G.; Zimmerman, D.H. LEAPS Vaccine Incorporating HER-2/neu Epitope Elicits Protection That Prevents and Limits Tumor Growth and Spread of Breast Cancer in a Mouse Model. J. Immunol. Res. 2017, 2017, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Goel, N.; Rong, Q.; Zimmerman, D.; Rosenthal, K.S. A LEAPS heteroconjugate vaccine containing a T cell epitope from HSV-1 glycoprotein D elicits Th1 responses and protection. Vaccine 2003, 21, 4410–4420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Rosenthal, K.S.; Mao, H.; Horne, W.I.; Wright, C.; Zimmerman, D. Immunization with a LEAPS heteroconjugate containing a CTL epitope and a peptide from beta-2-microglobulin elicits a protective and DTH response to herpes simplex virus type 1. Vaccine 1999, 17, 535–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Kelchtermans, H.; Billiau, A.; Matthys, P. How interferon-γ keeps autoimmune diseases in check. Trends Immunol. 2008, 29, 479–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Maeshima, K.; Yamaoka, K.; Kubo, S.; Nakano, K.; Iwata, S.; Saito, K.; Ohishi, M.; Miyahara, H.; Tanaka, S.; Ishii, K.; et al. The JAK inhibitor tofacitinib regulates synovitis through inhibition of interferon-γ and interleukin-17 production by human CD4+ T cells. Arthritis Rheum. 2012, 64, 1790–1798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Ross, S.H.; Cantrell, D.A. Signaling and Function of Interleukin-2 in T Lymphocytes. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2018, 36, 411–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zimmerman, D.H.; Carambula, R.E.; Ciemielewski, J.; Rosenthal, K.S. Lessons from next generation influenza vaccines for inflammatory disease therapies. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2019, 74, 105729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Rosenthal, K.S.; Zimmerman, D. J-LEAPS vaccines elicit antigen specific Th1 responses by promoting maturation of type 1 dendritic cells (DC1). AIMS Allergy Immunol. 2017, 1, 89–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Navarro-Sarabia, F.; Ariza-Ariza, R.; Hernandez-Cruz, B.; Villanueva, I. Adalimumab for treating rheumatoid arthritis. J. Rheumatol. 2006, 33, 1075–1081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Nielsen, M.A.; Lomholt, S.; Mellemkjær, A.; Andersen, M.N.; Buckley, C.D.; Kragstrup, T.W. Responses to Cytokine Inhibitors Associated with Cellular Composition in Models of Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Arthritis. ACR Open Rheumatol. 2020, 2, 3–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Chadwick, L.; Zhao, S.; Mysler, E.; Moots, R.J. Review of Biosimilar Trials and Data on Etanercept in Rheumatoid Arthritis. Curr. Rheumatol. Rep. 2018, 20, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Cavalli, G.; Dinarello, C.A. Anakinra therapy for non-cancer inflammatory diseases. Front. Pharmacol. 2018, 9, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Scott, L.J. Tocilizumab: A Review in Rheumatoid Arthritis. Drugs 2017, 77, 1865–1879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Frieder, J.; Kivelevitch, D.; Menter, A. Secukinumab: A review of the anti-IL-17A biologic for the treatment of psoriasis. Ther. Adv. Chronic Dis. 2018, 9, 5–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Hamel, K.; Doodes, P.; Cao, Y.; Wang, Y.; Martinson, J.; Dunn, R.; Kehry, M.R.; Farkas, B.; Finnegan, A. Suppression of proteoglycan-induced arthritis by anti-CD20 B Cell depletion therapy is mediated by reduction in autoantibodies and CD4+ T cell reactivity. J. Immunol. 2008, 180, 4994–5003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Shaw, T.; Quan, J.; Totoritis, M.C. B cell therapy for rheumatoid arthritis: The rituximab (anti-CD20) experience. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2003, 62, 55–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Bughani, U.; Saha, A.; Kuriakose, A.; Nair, R.; Sadashivarao, R.B.; Venkataraman, R.; Patel, S.; Deshchougule, A.T.; Montero, E.; Pai, H.V.; et al. T cell activation and differentiation is modulated by a CD6 domain 1 antibody Itolizumab. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0180088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Aira, L.E.; Hernández, P.; Prada, D.; Chico, A.; Gómez, J.A.; González, Z.; Fuentes, K.; Viada, C.; Mazorra, Z. Immunological evaluation of rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with itolizumab. MAbs 2016, 8, 187–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Rodríguez, P.C.; Prada, D.M.; Moreno, E.; Aira, L.E.; Molinero, C.; López, A.M.; Gómez, J.A.; Hernández, I.M.; Martínez, J.P.; Reyes, Y.; et al. The anti-CD6 antibody itolizumab provides clinical benefit without lymphopenia in rheumatoid arthritis patients: Results from a 6-month, open-label Phase I clinical trial. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 2018, 191, 229–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Shuford, W.W.; Klussman, K.; Tritchler, D.D.; Loo, D.T.; Chalupny, J.; Siadak, A.W.; Brown, T.J.; Emswiler, J.; Raecho, H.; Larsen, C.P.; et al. 4-1BB costimulatory signals preferentially induce CD8+ T cell proliferation and lead to the amplification in vivo of cytotoxic T cell responses. J. Exp. Med. 1997, 186, 47–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Dharmadhikari, B.; Wu, M.; Abdullah, N.S.; Rajendran, S.; Ishak, N.D.; Nickles, E.; Harfuddin, Z.; Schwarz, H. CD137 and CD137L signals are main drivers of type 1, cell-mediated immune responses. Oncoimmunology 2016, 5, e1113367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Alenazy, M.F.; Saheb Sharif-Askari, F.; Omair, M.A.; El-Wetidy, M.S.; Omair, M.A.; Mitwalli, H.; Al-Muhsen, S.; Al-Masri, A.; Hamid, Q.; Halwani, R. Abatacept enhances blood regulatory B cells of rheumatoid arthritis patients to a level that associates with disease remittance. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  55. Cutolo, M.; Sulli, A.; Paolino, S.; Pizzorni, C. CTLA-4 blockade in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: An update. Expert Rev. Clin. Immunol. 2016, 12, 417–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Kawashiri, S.; Endo, Y.; Nishino, A.; Okamoto, M.; Tsuji, S.; Takatani, A.; Shimizu, T.; Sumiyoshi, R.; Koga, T.; Iwamoto, N.; et al. Association between serum bone biomarker levels and therapeutic response to abatacept in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA): A multicenter, prospective, and observational RA ultrasound cohort study in Japan. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 2021, 22, 506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Visvanathan, S.; Daniluk, S.; Ptaszyński, R.; Müller-Ladner, U.; Ramanujam, M.; Rosenstock, B.; Eleftheraki, A.G.; Vinisko, R.; Petříková, A.; Kellner, H.; et al. Effects of BI 655064, an antagonistic anti-CD40 antibody, on clinical and biomarker variables in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase IIa study. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2019, 78, 754–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Lai, J.-H.; Luo, S.-F.; Ho, L.-J. Targeting the CD40-CD154 Signaling Pathway for Treatment of Autoimmune Arthritis. Cells 2019, 8, 927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Zheng, X.; Wu, W.; Liu, Y.; Zheng, P. US Patent Application: Methods of Use of Soluble CD24 for Therapy of Rheumatoid Arthritis. U.S. 2013/0136739 A1, 28 April 2011. [Google Scholar]
  60. Chen, G.-Y.; Tang, J.; Zheng, P.; Liu, Y. CD24 and Siglec-10 Selectively Repress Tissue Damage-Induced Immune Responses. Science 2009, 323, 1722–1725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Lee, J.; Smeriglio, P.; Dragoo, J.; Maloney, W.J.; Bhutani, N. CD24 enrichment protects while its loss increases susceptibility of juvenile chondrocytes towards inflammation. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2016, 18, 292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Salomon, S.; Guignant, C.; Morel, P.; Flahaut, G.; Brault, C.; Gourguechon, C.; Fardellone, P.; Marolleau, J.-P.; Gubler, B.; Goëb, V. Th17 and CD24hiCD27+ regulatory B lymphocytes are biomarkers of response to biologics in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2017, 19, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Virtanen, A.T.; Haikarainen, T.; Raivola, J.; Silvennoinen, O. Selective JAKinibs: Prospects in Inflammatory and Autoimmune Diseases. BioDrugs 2019, 33, 15–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Traves, P.G.; Murray, B.; Campigotto, F.; Galien, R.; Meng, A.; Di Paolo, J.A. JAK selectivity and the implications for clinical inhibition of pharmacodynamic cytokine signalling by filgotinib, upadacitinib, tofacitinib and baricitinib. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2021, 80, 865–875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Kubo, S.; Nakayamada, S.; Sakata, K.; Kitanaga, Y.; Ma, X.; Lee, S.; Ishii, A.; Yamagata, K.; Nakano, K.; Tanaka, Y. Janus kinase inhibitor baricitinib modulates human innate and adaptive immune system. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 1510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Ghoreschi, K.; Jesson, M.I.; Li, X.; Lee, J.L.; Ghosh, S.; Alsup, J.W.; Warner, J.D.; Tanaka, M.; Steward-Tharp, S.M.; Gadina, M.; et al. Modulation of Innate and Adaptive Immune Responses by Tofacitinib (CP-690,550). J. Immunol. 2011, 186, 4234–4243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Hammitzsch, A.; Chen, L.; de Wit, J.; Al-Mossawi, M.H.; Ridley, A.; Sekine, T.; Simone, D.; Doig, K.; Skapenko, A.; Bowness, P. Inhibiting ex-vivo Th17 responses in Ankylosing Spondylitis by targeting Janus kinases. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Hodge, J.A.; Kawabata, T.T.; Krishnaswami, S.; Clark, J.D.; Telliez, J.B.; Dowty, M.E.; Menon, S.; Lamba, M.; Zwillich, S. The mechanism of action of tofacitinib—An oral Janus kinase inhibitor for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Clin. Exp. Rheumatol. 2016, 34, 318–328. [Google Scholar]
  69. O’Shea, J.J.; Holland, S.M.; Staudt, L.M. JAKs and STATs in immunity, immunodeficiency, and cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2013, 368, 161–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Harigai, M.; Honda, S. Selectivity of Janus Kinase Inhibitors in Rheumatoid Arthritis and Other Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Diseases: Is Expectation the Root of All Headache? Drugs 2020, 80, 1183–1201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Van Rompaey, L.; Galien, R.; van der Aar, E.M.; Clement-Lacroix, P.; Nelles, L.; Smets, B.; Lepescheux, L.; Christophe, T.; Conrath, K.; Vandeghinste, N.; et al. Preclinical characterization of GLPG0634, a selective inhibitor of JAK1, for the treatment of inflammatory diseases. J. Immunol. 2013, 191, 3568–3577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Kitanaga, Y.; Imamura, E.; Nakahara, Y.; Fukahori, H.; Fujii, Y.; Kubo, S.; Nakayamada, S.; Tanaka, Y. In vitro pharmacological effects of peficitinib on lymphocyte activation: A potential treatment for systemic sclerosis with JAK inhibitors. Rheumatology 2020, 59, 1957–1968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Huarte, E.; Peel, M.T.; Verbist, K.; Fay, B.L.; Bassett, R.; Albeituni, S.; Nichols, K.E.; Smith, P.A. Ruxolitinib, a JAK1/2 Inhibitor, Ameliorates Cytokine Storm in Experimental Models of Hyperin fl ammation Syndrome. Front. Pharmacol. 2021, 12, 650295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Singer, J.W.; Al-Fayoumi, S.; Taylor, J.; Velichko, S.; O’Mahony, A. Comparative phenotypic profiling of the JAK2 inhibitors ruxolitinib, fedratinib, momelotinib, and pacritinib reveals distinct mechanistic signatures. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0222944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Tarrant, J.M.; Galien, R.; Li, W.; Goyal, L.; Pan, Y.; Hawtin, R.; Zhang, W.; Van der Aa, A.; Taylor, P.C. Filgotinib, a JAK1 Inhibitor, Modulates Disease-Related Biomarkers in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Results from Two Randomized, Controlled Phase 2b Trials. Rheumatol. Ther. 2020, 7, 173–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  76. Zhou, T.; Georgeon, S.; Moser, R.; Moore, D.J.; Caflisch, A.; Hantschel, O. Specificity and mechanism-of-action of the JAK2 tyrosine kinase inhibitors ruxolitinib and SAR302503 (TG101348). Leukemia 2014, 28, 404–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Lin, C.M.; Cooles, F.A.; Isaacs, J.D. Basic Mechanisms of JAK Inhibition. Mediterr. J. Rheumatol. 2020, 31, 100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Pardanani, A.; Harrison, C.; Cortes, J.E.; Cervantes, F.; Mesa, R.A.; Milligan, D.; Masszi, T.; Mishchenko, E.; Jourdan, E.; Vannucchi, A.M.; et al. Safety and Efficacy of Fedratinib in Patients With Primary or Secondary Myelofibrosis. JAMA Oncol. 2015, 1, 643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Blair, H.A. Fedratinib: First Approval. Drugs 2019, 79, 1719–1725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Zarrin, A.A.; Bao, K.; Lupardus, P.; Vucic, D. Kinase inhibition in autoimmunity and inflammation. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2021, 20, 39–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Morris, R.; Kershaw, N.J.; Babon, J.J. The molecular details of cytokine signaling via the JAK/STAT pathway. Protein Sci. 2018, 27, 1984–2009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Moura, R.A.; Fonseca, J.E. JAK Inhibitors and Modulation of B Cell Immune Responses in Rheumatoid Arthritis. Front. Med. 2021, 7, 1105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Burmester, G.R.; Feist, E.; Dörner, T. Emerging cell and cytokine targets in rheumatoid arthritis. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 2013, 10, 77–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Lipman, N.S.; Jackson, L.R.; Trudel, L.J.; Weis-Garcia, F. Monoclonal versus polyclonal antibodies: Distinguishing characteristics, applications, and information resources. ILAR J. 2005, 46, 258–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  85. Leonard, W.J.; Lin, J.X.; O’Shea, J.J. The γ c Family of Cytokines: Basic Biology to Therapeutic Ramifications. Immunity 2019, 50, 832–850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  86. O’Shea, J.J.; Plenge, R. JAK and STAT Signaling Molecules in Immunoregulation and Immune-Mediated Disease. Immunity 2012, 36, 542–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  87. O’shea, J.J.; Kontzias, A.; Yamaoka, K.; Tanaka, Y.; Laurence, A. Janus kinase Inhibitors in autoimmune diseases. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2013, 72, ii111–ii115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Schwartz, D.M.; Bonelli, M.; Gadina, M.; O’shea, J.J. Type I II cytokines, JAKs, and new strategies for treating autoimmune diseases. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 2016, 12, 25–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Schwartz, D.M.; Kanno, Y.; Villarino, A.; Ward, M.; Gadina, M.; O’Shea, J.J. Jak inhibition as a therapetuic strategy for immune and inflammatory diseases. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2017, 17, 843–862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Bauer, W.; Gyenesei, A.; Krętowski, A. The multifactorial progression from the islet autoimmunity to type 1 diabetes in children. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 7493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Seder, R.A.; Darrah, P.A.; Roederer, M. T-cell quality in memory and protection: Implications for vaccine design. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2008, 8, 247–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Bäckström, N.F.; Dahlgren, U.I.H. Bystander suppression of collagen-induced arthritis in mice fed ovalbumin. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2004, 6, R151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  93. Oki, S.; Tomi, C.; Yamamura, T.; Miyake, S. Preferential T(h)2 polarization by OCH is supported by incompetent NKT cell induction of CD40L and following production of inflammatory cytokines by bystander cells in vivo. Int. Immunol. 2005, 17, 1619–1629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  94. Lu, S.; Holmdahl, R. Different therapeutic and bystander effects by intranasal administration of homologous type II and type IX collagens on the collagen-induced arthritis and pristane-induced arthritis in rats. Clin. Immunol. 1999, 90, 119–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Khmaladze, I.; Saxena, A.; Nandakumar, K.S.; Holmdahl, R. B-cell epitope spreading and inflammation in a mouse model of arthritis is associated with a deficiency in reactive oxygen species production. Eur. J. Immunol. 2015, 45, 2243–2251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Didona, D.; Di Zenzo, G. Humoral epitope spreading in autoimmune bullous diseases. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 1–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  97. Kidd, B.A.; Ho, P.P.; Sharpe, O.; Zhao, X.; Tomooka, B.H.; Kanter, J.L.; Steinman, L.; Robinson, W.H. Epitope spreading to citrullinated antigens in mouse models of autoimmune arthritis and demyelination. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2008, 10, R119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  98. Lauper, K.; Mongin, D.; Iannone, F.; Kristianslund, E.K.; Kvien, T.K.; Nordström, D.C.; Pavelka, K.; Pombo-Suarez, M.; Rotar, Z.; Santos, M.J.; et al. Comparative effectiveness of TNF inhibitors and tocilizumab with and without conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in a pan-European observational cohort of bio-naïve patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Semin. Arthritis Rheum. 2020, 50, 17–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Smolen, J.S.; Landewé, R.B.M.; Bijlsma, J.W.J.; Burmester, G.R.; Dougados, M.; Kerschbaumer, A.; McInnes, I.B.; Sepriano, A.; Van Vollenhoven, R.F.; De Wit, M.; et al. EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: 2019 update. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2020, 79, S685–S699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  100. Kempeni, J. Preliminary results of early clinical trials with the fully human anti- TNFα monoclonal antibody D2E7. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 1999, 58, 70–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Rau, R. Adalimumab (a fully human anti-tumour necrosis factor α monoclonal antibody) in the treatment of active rheumatoid arthritis: The initial results of five trials. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2002, 61, 70–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  102. Carter, C.T.; Changolkar, A.K.; Scott McKenzie, R. Adalimumab, etanercept, and infliximab utilization patterns and drug costs among rheumatoid arthritis patients. J. Med. Econ. 2012, 15, 332–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Michaud, T.L.; Rho, Y.H.; Shamliyan, T.; Kuntz, K.M.; Choi, H.K. The Comparative Safety of TNF Inhibitors in Rheumatoid Arthritis—A Meta-Analysis Update of 44 Randomized Controlled Trials. Am. J. Med. 2014, 127, 1208–1232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Targan, S.R.; Hanauer, S.B.; van Deventer, S.J.H.; Mayer, L.; Present, D.H.; Braakman, T.; DeWoody, K.L.; Schaible, T.F.; Rutgeerts, P.J. A Short-Term Study of Chimeric Monoclonal Antibody cA2 to Tumor Necrosis Factor α for Crohn’s Disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 1997, 337, 1029–1036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  105. van Dullemen, H.M.; van Deventer, S.J.H.; Hommes, D.W.; Bijl, H.A.; Jansen, J.; Tytgat, G.N.J.; Woody, J. Treatment of Crohn’s disease with anti-tumor necrosis factor chimeric monoclonal antibody (cA2). Gastroenterology 1995, 109, 129–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Elliott, M.J.; Maini, R.N.; Feldmann, M.; Long-Fox, A.; Charles, P.; Katsikis, P.; Brennan, F.M.; Walker, J.; Bijl, H.; Ghrayeb, J. Treatment of rheumatoid arthritis with chimeric monoclonal antibodies to tumor necrosis factor alpha. Arthritis Rheum. 1993, 36, 1681–1690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Ghazawi, F.M.; Mahmood, F.; Kircik, L.; Poulin, Y.; Bourcier, M.; Vender, R.; Wiseman, M.C.; Lynde, C.; Litvinov, I.V. A Review of the Efficacy and Safety for Biologic Agents Targeting IL-23 in Treating Psoriasis With the Focus on Tildrakizumab. Front. Med. 2021, 8, 1280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Mahapatro, M.; Erkert, L.; Becker, C. Cytokine-mediated crosstalk between immune cells and epithelial cells in the gut. Cells 2021, 10, 111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Rider, P.; Carmi, Y.; Cohen, I. Biologics for Targeting Inflammatory Cytokines, Clinical Uses, and Limitations. Int. J. Cell Biol. 2016, 2016, 9259646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  110. Hu, X.; Ivashkiv, L.B. Cross-regulation of Signaling Pathways by Interferon-γ: Implications for Immune Responses and Autoimmune Diseases. Immunity 2009, 31, 539–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  111. Chatzidionysiou, K. Beyond Methotrexate and Biologics in RA—Efficacy of JAK Inhibitors and their Place in the Current Treatment Armamentarium. Mediterr. J. Rheumatol. 2020, 31, 120–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Kotyla, P.J. Are Janus Kinase Inhibitors Superior over Classic Biologic Agents in RA Patients? Biomed Res. Int. 2018, 2018, 7492904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  113. Taylor, P.R.; Koski, G.K.; Paustian, C.C.; Bailey, E.; Cohen, P.A.; Moore, F.B.-G.; Zimmerman, D.H.; Rosenthal, K.S. J-LEAPS vaccines initiate murine Th1 responses by activating dendritic cells. Vaccine 2010, 28, 5533–5542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Rosenthal, K.S.; Carambula, R.; Zimmerman, D.H. Why don’t we have a vaccine against autoimmune Disease?—A review. J. Clin. Cell. Immunol. 2019, 10, 574. [Google Scholar]
Biomedicines 10 00044 g001 550
Figure 1. Disruption of the homeostasis of the immune system promoting arthritis. (1A) Homeostasis: Antigen-presenting cells present peptides and cytokines to activate antigen-specific T cells influenced by environmental signals and cytokines. A balance of pro-inflammatory to humoral and regulatory responses promote immune homeostasis. Red symbols within dotted circles represent pro-inflammatory cytokines and blue symbols represent anti-inflammatory cytokines. (1B) Autoimmunity: Environmental factors (e.g., smoking), trauma (repetitive bone or cartilage injury), infections (microbial antigen mimicry), and genetic predisposition (e.g., MHC: HLA-DR4) can promote an inflammatory environment that promotes a self-sustaining disruption of immune balance that can result in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Arthritogenic self-antigens are presented by DCs, macrophages, and B cells to T cells to generate auto-antibodies and self-reactive T cells, respectively, which promote inflammatory cytokine production that activates other cells and induces tissue remodeling and disruption.
Figure 1. Disruption of the homeostasis of the immune system promoting arthritis. (1A) Homeostasis: Antigen-presenting cells present peptides and cytokines to activate antigen-specific T cells influenced by environmental signals and cytokines. A balance of pro-inflammatory to humoral and regulatory responses promote immune homeostasis. Red symbols within dotted circles represent pro-inflammatory cytokines and blue symbols represent anti-inflammatory cytokines. (1B) Autoimmunity: Environmental factors (e.g., smoking), trauma (repetitive bone or cartilage injury), infections (microbial antigen mimicry), and genetic predisposition (e.g., MHC: HLA-DR4) can promote an inflammatory environment that promotes a self-sustaining disruption of immune balance that can result in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Arthritogenic self-antigens are presented by DCs, macrophages, and B cells to T cells to generate auto-antibodies and self-reactive T cells, respectively, which promote inflammatory cytokine production that activates other cells and induces tissue remodeling and disruption.
Biomedicines 10 00044 g001
Biomedicines 10 00044 g002 550
Figure 2. Overview of the CIA- and PGIA/GIA-induced animal models of rheumatoid arthritis (2A) CIA: The collagen-induced arthritis model is initiated by bovine collagen with adjuvant to promote inflammatory responses that override tolerance and induce autoimmune responses to collagen. The nature of the murine immune response and method of initiation induce a Th17-driven arthritis. (2B) PGIA/GIA: The proteoglycan-induced and the related rhG1 domain-induced models of arthritis are initiated in older female mice by injection of these proteins with adjuvant to promote Th1-driven arthritis which also includes Th17 responses. Human disease occurs mostly in older women and other aspects of this model also resemble human disease.
Figure 2. Overview of the CIA- and PGIA/GIA-induced animal models of rheumatoid arthritis (2A) CIA: The collagen-induced arthritis model is initiated by bovine collagen with adjuvant to promote inflammatory responses that override tolerance and induce autoimmune responses to collagen. The nature of the murine immune response and method of initiation induce a Th17-driven arthritis. (2B) PGIA/GIA: The proteoglycan-induced and the related rhG1 domain-induced models of arthritis are initiated in older female mice by injection of these proteins with adjuvant to promote Th1-driven arthritis which also includes Th17 responses. Human disease occurs mostly in older women and other aspects of this model also resemble human disease.
Biomedicines 10 00044 g002
Biomedicines 10 00044 g003 550
Figure 3. Comparison of cytokine-targeting therapies to treat autoimmune conditions. LEAPS immunomodulating therapy: (3A) CEL-2000 J-LEAPS vaccine: Immunization of diseased animals activates dendritic cells to promote antigen-specific Th1 responses and IL-10 to modulate the disease driving Th17 and inflammatory cytokine responses and provide therapy. (3B) CEL-4000 and related DerG-LEAPS vaccines: CEL-4000 vaccination of diseased animals activates antigen-specific CD4 Th2 and Treg cells to modulate the disease driving Th1, Th17 and inflammatory cytokine responses. Treatment favors a ratio of increased anti-(IL-4, IL-10) vs. pro-(IFN-γ or IL-17) for cytokine secreting CD4 spleen T cells. Monoablation therapy for inflammatory cytokines (DMARDS): (3C) Neutralizing antibody to IL-1, TNFα, or IL-6 (not shown); (3D) Receptor antagonist inhibition of cytokine action: Neutralization or blocking of cytokine receptor by antibody can prevent systemic action of a specific inflammatory cytokine but also affects antimicrobial and other immune responses. Treatment has no effect on anti-inflammatory cytokines. Inhibition of JAK-tyrosine kinase cascade: (3E–3G) Inhibitors of of different JAKs: Small molecular inhibitors of JAK1, JAK2, JAK3 or tyrosine kinase 2 (TYK2) block the signal transmission from associated cytokine receptors to block inflammatory and regulatory responses, depending upon the JAK(s) that are inhibited. These inhibitors downregulate transcription of one or more cytokine gene, as listed in Table 1.
Figure 3. Comparison of cytokine-targeting therapies to treat autoimmune conditions. LEAPS immunomodulating therapy: (3A) CEL-2000 J-LEAPS vaccine: Immunization of diseased animals activates dendritic cells to promote antigen-specific Th1 responses and IL-10 to modulate the disease driving Th17 and inflammatory cytokine responses and provide therapy. (3B) CEL-4000 and related DerG-LEAPS vaccines: CEL-4000 vaccination of diseased animals activates antigen-specific CD4 Th2 and Treg cells to modulate the disease driving Th1, Th17 and inflammatory cytokine responses. Treatment favors a ratio of increased anti-(IL-4, IL-10) vs. pro-(IFN-γ or IL-17) for cytokine secreting CD4 spleen T cells. Monoablation therapy for inflammatory cytokines (DMARDS): (3C) Neutralizing antibody to IL-1, TNFα, or IL-6 (not shown); (3D) Receptor antagonist inhibition of cytokine action: Neutralization or blocking of cytokine receptor by antibody can prevent systemic action of a specific inflammatory cytokine but also affects antimicrobial and other immune responses. Treatment has no effect on anti-inflammatory cytokines. Inhibition of JAK-tyrosine kinase cascade: (3E–3G) Inhibitors of of different JAKs: Small molecular inhibitors of JAK1, JAK2, JAK3 or tyrosine kinase 2 (TYK2) block the signal transmission from associated cytokine receptors to block inflammatory and regulatory responses, depending upon the JAK(s) that are inhibited. These inhibitors downregulate transcription of one or more cytokine gene, as listed in Table 1.
Biomedicines 10 00044 g003
Table
Table 1. Approaches to targeting inflammatory cytokines in RA and RA animal models with regard to targets, cytokines, and therapies.
Table 1. Approaches to targeting inflammatory cytokines in RA and RA animal models with regard to targets, cytokines, and therapies.
TypeTarget↓/↑ ModulationRegulated Immune Component, If Known [References]Generic and Product name, Regulatory StatusRef.
Therapeutic VaccinesTh1↓IL-1, IL-17, IFN-γ, TNF-α [3,29,30]CEL-4000 (preclinical)[3,29,30]
↑Treg (FOXP3+), IL-4, IL-10, TGF-β [3,29,30]
Th17↓TNF-α, IL-17, IL-6, MCP-1, IL-12p40 [27] CEL-2000 (preclinical)[27]
↑IL-12p70, IL-10 [27]
DMARDsTNF-α ↓TNF-α [41]Adalimumab (Humira®)[41,42]
TNF-α↓TNF-α [43]Etanercept (Enbrel®) [43]
IL-1Ra↓IL-1 [44]Anakinra (Kineret®) [44]
IL-6R msR↓MCP-1 [42], IL-6 [45]Tocilizumab (Actemra®)[42,45]
IL-17↓MCP-1 [42], IL-17A [46]Secukinumab (Cosentyx®)[42,46]
CD20↓B cells as APCs: CD4+IFN-γ+, CD4+IL-17+ [47]Rituximab (Rituxan®)[47,48]
Anti-CD6↓IL-17 [49], IFN-γ [49,50], IL-6, TNF-α [50]Itolizumab (Alzumab®)[49,50,51]
Agonistic Anti-CD137 ↑IFN-γ [52,53], IDO [53]Utomilumab[52,53]
Anti-CTLA4↓IL-17, IFN-γ [54]Abatacept (Orencia®)[54,55,56]
↑IL-35, IFN-β [54]
Anti-CD40↓IL-6, RANKL [57], TNF-α, NF-κβ, IL-6, ICAM-1, VCAM-1, VEGF [58]Bi 655064[57,58]
CD24↓TNF-α, IL-6, MCP-1(CCL2), IL-1β [59] NF-κβ [60] [59,61,62]
JakinibsJAK3 > JAK1, JAK2 > TYK2 [63]↓Transcription: IL-2, IL-4, IL-7, IL-9, IL-15, IL-21, IL-6, IL-11, IL-13, IL-25, IL-27, IL-31, IFN-α, IFN-β, IL-10, IL-22, IFN-γ, > EPO, TPO, GH, G-CSF, GM-CSF, Leptin, IL-3, IL-5 > IL-12, IL-23, Type III IFNs [64]
in vitro: IL-6 by B cells, [65] IL-2, IL-4, IL-7, IL-15, IL-21, IL-6, and IFN-γ in CD4+ T cells. IL-17 in Th17 cells polarized via IL-23. IL-21 and IL-22 in Th17 [66], IFN-α, IL-6, IFN-γ, IL-2, IL-15, IL-4, GM-CSF [64] MCP-1 [42] IL-17 in CD4+T cells from AS, PSA, RA, and HC [67]
in vivo: IL-6 in human [68] 		Tofacitinib (Xeljanz®)FDA approved (2012)[42,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71]
↑in vitro: IL-2 in Th1. IL-17, IL-2 in Th17 cells (polarized via TGF-β1, IL-6) [66]
JAK3 > JAK1, TYK2, JAK2 [63]↓Transcription: IFN-α, IFN-β, IL-10, IL-22, IL-2, IL-4, IL-7, IL-9, IL-15, IL-2, IFN-γ > IL-6, IL-11, IL-13, IL-25, IL-27, IL-31, IL-12, IL-23, Type III IFNs, EPO, TPO, GH, G-CSF, GM-CSF, Leptin, IL-3, IL-5
in vitro: IL-4, IL-13, IFN-γ, TNF-α in PBMC after TCR stimulation, IL-4, IL-13, IFN-γ, TNF-α, IL-17A, GM-CSF in PBMC after IL-2 stimulation [72]		Peficitinib (Smyraf®) Japan Approved (2019)[63,72]
JAK2, JAK1 > TYK2 > JAK3 [63]↓Transcription: IL-6, IL-11, IL-13, IL-25, IL-27, IL-31, IFN-α, IFN-β, IL-10, IL-22, IFN-γ > IL-2, IL-4, IL-7, IL-9, IL-15, IL-21 > IL-12, IL-23, Type III IFNs, EPO, TPO, GH, G-CSF, GM-CSF, Leptin, IL-3, IL-5 [64]
in vitro: IL-6 in MoDCs, IFN-α secreted pDCs [65] MCP-1 [42] IL-17 in CD4+ T cells (AS, PSA, RA, and HC) [67]		Baricitnib (Olumiant®) FDA approved (2018)[42,63,64,65,67,69,70]
JAK2, JAK1 > TYK2 > JAK3 [63]↓Transcription: IFN-γ, EPO, TPO, GH, G-CSF, GM-CSF, Leptin, IL-3, IL-5 > IL-6, IL-11, IL-13, IL-25, IL-27, IL-31, IFN-α, IFN-β, IL-10, IL-22, IL-12, IL-23, Type III IFNs > IL-2, IL-4, IL-7, IL-9, IL-15, IL-21
in vitro: IL-10, IFN-γ, IL-6, TNF-α, IL-13 [73] IL-17 in CD4+ (AS, PSA, RA, and HC) [67]
in vivo: IFN-γ, IL-12p70, IL-6, G-CSF, IL-10, TNF-α [73]		Ruxolitinib (Jakafi®) FDA approved (2011) (myelofibrosis)[63,67,69,73,74]
↑in vitro: IL-2 [74]
JAK1 > JAK2 > TYK2 > JAK3 [63]↓Transcription: IL-6, IL-11, IL-13, IL-25, IL-27, IL-31 > IFN-α, IFN-β, IL-10, IL-22 > IFN-γ, > IL-2, IL-4, IL-7, IL-9, IL-15, IL-21 > EPO, TPO, GH, G-CSF, GM-CSF, Leptin, IL-3, IL-5, IL-12, IL-23, Type III IFNs [64]
in vitro: IL-2, IL-4, IFN-αB2, IFN-γ [71] IFN-α, IL-6, IFN-γ, IL-2, IL-15, IL-4 [64]
ex vivo: IL-6, GM-CSF [64]
in vivo: IFN-γ, IL-6, IL-1β, RANKL, MMP-3, MMP-13, IP10, XCL1, MCP-1, MIP-1b, MCP-3, MCP-5, M-CSF1, MDC, SCF, KC/GRO, IL-1α [71] SAA, IL-6, IL-1β, GM-CSF, TNF-RI, Resistin, TNF-α, MMP-3, YKL40, VEGF, MMP-1, IL-12, IL-2, IFN-γ, IL-13, IL-5, IL-21, IL-23, IL-17A, IL-7, IL-10, CXCL10, CXCL13, MCP-1, VCAM-1, MIP-1a [75]		Filgotinib (Jyseleca®) EMA & Japan approved (2020) [63,64,69,71,75]
JAK1 > JAK2 > JAK3 > TYK2 [63]↓Transcription: IL-6, IL-11, IL-13, IL-25, IL-27, IL-31, IFN-α, IFN-β, IL-10, IL-22, IFN-γ EPO, TPO, GH, G-CSF, GM-CSF, Leptin, IL-3, IL-5 IL-2, IL-4, IL-7, IL-9, IL-15, IL-21 > IL-12, IL-23, Type III IFNs [64]
in vitro: IFN-α, IL-6, IFN-γ, IL-2, IL-4, IL-15, G-CSF [64] 		Upadacitinib (Rinvoq®) FDA approved (2019)[63,64,70]
JAK2 > JAK1 > TYK2 > JAK3 [76]↓See main text
in vitro: VCAM-1, IL-6 [74]		Fedratinib (Inrebic®) (2019) (myelofibrosis)[63,74,77,78,79]
↑in vitro: IL-2 [74]
Footnotes: Heat map colors: Red: proinflammatory; Blue: anti-inflammatory; Gray: either possibility. For abbreviations used above, see abbreviation section before the author contribution section For jakinibs: extrapolated expectations are based on the inhibited JAK/STAT pathways indicated by experimental data. Canonical JAK signaling pathways: JAK1/JAK3: IL-2, IL-4, IL-7, IL-9, IL-15, IL-21; JAK1/JAK2: IFN-γ; JAK1/TYK2: IFN-α, IFN-β, IL-10, IL-22; JAK1/JAK2/TYK2: IL-6, IL-11, IL-13, IL-25, IL-27, IL-31; JAK2/TYK2: IL-12, IL-23, Type III IFNs; JAK2/JAK2: EPO, TPO, GH, G-CSF, GM-CSF, Leptin, IL-3, IL-5 [68,80,81,82].
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Markovics, A.; Rosenthal, K.S.; Mikecz, K.; Carambula, R.E.; Ciemielewski, J.C.; Zimmerman, D.H. Restoring the Balance between Pro-Inflammatory and Anti-Inflammatory Cytokines in the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis: New Insights from Animal Models. Biomedicines 2022, 10, 44. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10010044

AMA Style

Markovics A, Rosenthal KS, Mikecz K, Carambula RE, Ciemielewski JC, Zimmerman DH. Restoring the Balance between Pro-Inflammatory and Anti-Inflammatory Cytokines in the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis: New Insights from Animal Models. Biomedicines. 2022; 10(1):44. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10010044

Chicago/Turabian Style

Markovics, Adrienn, Ken S. Rosenthal, Katalin Mikecz, Roy E. Carambula, Jason C. Ciemielewski, and Daniel H. Zimmerman. 2022. "Restoring the Balance between Pro-Inflammatory and Anti-Inflammatory Cytokines in the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis: New Insights from Animal Models" Biomedicines 10, no. 1: 44. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10010044

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop