Next Article in Journal
Low Energy Beta Emitter Measurement: A Review
Previous Article in Journal
Experimental Study and Mathematical Modeling of a Glyphosate Impedimetric Microsensor Based on Molecularly Imprinted Chitosan Film
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

A Review of Nanostructured Resistive-Based Vanadium Oxide Gas Sensors

1
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Shiraz University of Technology, Shiraz 71555-13876, Iran
2
School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Shiraz University, Shiraz 51154-71348, Iran
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Chemosensors 2020, 8(4), 105; https://doi.org/10.3390/chemosensors8040105
Submission received: 22 September 2020 / Revised: 20 October 2020 / Accepted: 23 October 2020 / Published: 25 October 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Applied Chemical Sensors)

Abstract

:
Vanadium pentoxide (V2O5) is a transition metal oxide with features such as high availability, good catalytic activity, unique electrical properties and high conductivity which are appropriate for gas sensing applications. In this review, we discuss different gas sensing aspects of V2O5 in pristine, doped, decorated and composite forms. Depending on its synthesis procedure, morphology, sensing temperature and surface conditions, the V2O5-based gas sensors show different responses to target gases. Herein, we have discussed the behavior of V2O5-based gas sensors to different gases and associated sensing mechanisms. This review paper can be a useful reference for the researchers who works in the field of gas sensors.

1. Introduction

Vanadium (V) is a well-known transition metal which can form different oxides. The principal oxides of vanadium are vanadium monoxide (VO, violet color), vanadium sesquioxide (V2O3, green color), vanadium dioxide (VO2, blue color), and vanadium pentoxide (V2O5, yellow color). Presence of oxygen vacancies leads to formation other oxides such as V3O7, V4O9, and V6O13 (a mixture of V5+ and V4+), and a series of oxides such as V6O11, V7O13, and V8O15 (a mixture of V4+ and V3+). In general, the mixing phases can be categorized into two series of phases namely the Magnéli phase (VnO2n-1) and the Wadsley phase VnO2n+1 [1,2]. Among different phases, V2O5 is thermodynamically the most stable oxide and it exist in different polymorphs namely the most stable α-V2O5 (orthorhombic), metastable β-V2O5 (tetragonal or monoclinic), γ-V2O5 (orthorhombic) and δ-V2O5 (monoclinic) [3]. Each polymorph is stable at a temperature and pressure range. For example, β-V2O5 is stable at high pressure and temperatures [4].
The orthorhombic V2O5 has a layered structure and it is comprised of the distorted polyhedra of six oxygen atoms which form octahedral polyhedra with central V atoms [5]. There are three different oxygen positions in the V2O5 crystal structure. The VO6 octahedra are linked, sharing edges through the chain (Oc) and corners via the bridging oxygens (Ob). Two vanadyl oxygen atoms (Ov) form the vertices of the octahedra along the c-axis [6].
V2O5 is highly abundant in nature, it has low price and has several oxidation states [7,8]. Accordingly, due to its relatively open layered structure and its unique properties, V2O5 has been used in different applications such as water splitting [9], field effect transistors [10,11], supercapacitors [12], IR detectors [13], photodetectors [14], UV sensors [15], optical sensors [16], amprometric gas sensors [17], potentiometric sensors [18] electrochemical sensors [19,20], cataluminescence sensors [21], resistance gas sensors [22,23], gasochromic sensors [24] and humidity sensors [25].
V2O5 with an n-type semiconducting behavior, has a relatively high conductivity (0.5 S·cm−1) at room temperature [26]. At high temperatures, stoichiometric V2O5 spontaneously converts to V2O5−x as follows:
V 2 O 5 V 2 O 5 x + x 2 O 2 x ~   0.01
Values of “x” vary depending on annealing temperature and oxygen partial pressure during synthesis. As a result, oxygen vacancies form in the oxygen sub-lattice and n-type semiconducting is induced. To be neutral, some V5+ ions will be reduced to V4+ ions. Electrical conductivity in V2O5−x is due to jumping (hopping) of the electrons from V4+ ions to the neighboring V5+ ions [26].
Compared with bulk V2O5, nanostructured V2O5 materials have unique electrical and chemical properties and due to their ultrafine sizes, they offer a high surface area which is extremely beneficial for sensing studies [27,28,29,30].
Nowadays gas sensors have become widely used in different areas for detection of toxic, hazardous, explosive and greenhouse gases and vapors [31,32]. There are many types of gas sensors. However, resistive-based gas sensors using metal oxides are the most widely used gas sensors due to their unique features such as low price, high sensitivity, high stability, fast dynamics and simple fabrication and operation [33,34]. Figure 1 shows a typical gas sensor substrate, where its front side is equipped with conductive electrodes such as with Pt and its back side is equipped with a heater [35]. Herein, we comprehensively discuss different aspects of the gas sensing properties of V2O5-based nanomaterials. Previously, only one review paper about gas sensing properties of vanadium oxides has been published [36], and herein, we have comprehensively discussed pristine, decorated, doped and composite forms of V2O5 nanostructured materials with different morphologies for the gas sensing studies.

2. Pristine Nanostructured V2O5 Gas Sensors

Pristine V2O5 gas sensors with different morphologies have been reported in the literature. In this section, we discuss some of most important pristine V2O5 gas sensors. The gas sensing characteristics of V2O5 hierarchical architectures, especially for hollow spheres are rarely reported in the literature. In this regard, V2O5 hollow spheres (500–550 nm in diameter and a shell thickness of 55 nm) were synthesized through a solvothermal route. The hollow spheres were comprised of nanoplates with thicknesses of 50–80 nm and lengths of 70–120 nm. Moreover, for comparison solid nanostructured spheres were fabricated. The maximum responses (Ra/Rg) to trimethylamine (TEA) at 370 °C were 9.7 for V2O5 hollow spheres and 3.08 for V2O5 solid spheres, respectively. In fact, the hollow sphere hierarchical architecture with a higher surface area offered more adsorption sites for TEA molecules and a higher response for hollow spheres resulted. The sensing mechanism of the sensor to TEA was related to the reduction of V5+ ions to V4+ ions in the presence of TEA. Furthermore, based on XPS studies there was a slight shift to lower binding energy values after exposure of the sensor to TEA gas, confirming formation of V4+ ions. In addition, a color change from yellow to dark blue was observed, further confirming the formation of V4+ ions. V2O5 is an acidic oxide, which is highly suitable for the adsorption of basic molecules, such as TEA and consequently a larger response of the V2O5 hollow spheres sensor to TEA resulted [37].
Generally, resistive based gas sensors work at high temperatures, which need external heaters and increase the power consumption. Therefore, development of room temperature gas sensors not only solves above problems, but also integration with flexible substrates become easier. Furthermore, possible risk of explosion during sensing of explosive gases such as H2 gas significantly decreases. Hollow spheres comprising numerous nanocrystals of V2O5 as a shell were synthesized by a facile polyol approach for room temperature hydrogen gas sensing. The surface area of hollow spheres was about 356 m2/g and, therefore, it provided a large active surface area for adsorption of target gases. Furthermore, its porous structure led to further enhancement of gas reactions. Furthermore, the sharp corners as well as the edges of the tiny building blocks of hollow spheres were reported as highly active sites for enhancement of the sensing reactions during hydrogen sensing [38].
Another room temperature gas sensor was realized from V2O5 nanoneedles which were synthesized by a physical vapor deposition method [39]. The sensor exhibited a response (Ra/Rg) of 2.37 to 140 ppm acetone at room temperature. The relevant reaction was as follows:
(CH3)2CO +4 O2→ 3CO2 + 3H2O + 4e
The most energetically favorable gas reaction is that a surface oxygen atom attacks the carbonyl carbon to form a C-O bond. Acetone contains the carbonyl group and because of the greater electronegativity of oxygen; a carbonyl group is a polar functional group and, therefore, it has a larger dipole moment (D = 2.88), relative to other tested gases, leading to the higher response of the gas sensor to acetone.
Trimethylamine (TMA; (CH3)3N)) is generated from dead fish and, therefore, the concentration of TMA is an indicator of the freshness of fish [40]. Furthermore, exposure to TMA vapor can cause nausea, headaches, and irritation to the eyes [41]. In this regard, spherical V2O5 hierarchical nanostructures comprised of plenty of nanosheets were produced through a hydrothermal method. The optimal sensor based on spherical V2O5 hierarchical nanostructures displayed a response of ~2.8 to 100 ppm TMA along with fast response/recovery times (5/28 s) at 240 °C. The spherical V2O5 nanostructures were comprised of numerous monocrystalline nanosheets, and therefore they have a unique three-dimensional hierarchical structure which provided plenty of active sites for gas molecules. Accordingly, the reaction between chemisorbed oxygen ions and TMA molecules, resulted in a decrease in electrical resistance and contributed to the sensor signal.
2 ( C H 3 ) 3 N + 21 O ( a d s ) N 2 + 6 C O 2 + 9 H 2 O + 21 e
In addition, in a monocrystalline structure free electrons were able to transfer faster than in a polycrystalline structure, which results in fast response and recovery times of gas sensors and improvement of sensing properties [42].
In another study related to TMA detection, Meng et al. [43] reported the synthesis of V2O5 flower-like structures assembled by thin nanosheets by the hydrothermal process for TMA sensing researchers. Optimal gas sensors exhibited a response (Ra/Rg) of 2.2 to 5 ppm TMA at 200 °C with long-term stability and good selectivity. The good selectivity was related to the low C Chemosensors 08 00105 i001N bond energy and high electron cloud density around N atoms in TMA.
One-dimensional V2O5 nanostructures such as nanorods (NRs) are also very popular for gas sensing purposes [44]. In an effort by Raj et al. [45], V2O5 NRs with diameters in the range of 100–200 nm were synthesized using a solvothermal method. The gas sensor was fabricated in a pelletized form of V2O5 NRs and it showed higher response (Ra/Rg) to 5 ppm ethanol (1.04) relative to 5 ppm ammonia (1.02). However, not only were the response values low, but also the sensor did not show selectivity to ethanol gas. This can be due to the low surface area of gas sensor, resulting from the dense pellet form of the gas sensor which limited available adsorption sites for the target gas molecules. In another similar study using a pellet form of V2O5 nanostructures, Raj et al. [46] synthesized V2O5 nanostructures with nanopetal morphology via a co-precipitation method. The sensor showed very poor selectivity, and its response to ammonia and ethanol was almost the same.
1-butylamine is extensively used in many industrial fields. However, it is toxic and harmful for human health and the environment. Moreover, it is not only toxic for human beings, but also is flammable and corrosive [47]. In another study regarding 1-D materials, the role of bottom and top electrodes on the gas response of V2O5 nanofibers (NFs) to 1-buthylamine was investigated [48]. Both bottom electrodes (Type I), or top electrodes (Types II and III) were used. In Type I, interdigitated Au electrodes were applied. Moreover, interdigitated gold electrodes in Type II and III had different gap sizes of 5 nm and 150 nm, respectively. The target gas can be adsorbed as follows (i) intercalation adsorption into the layered structure of the fibers or adsorption on their surface, (ii) adsorption between the inter-fiber contacts, and (iii) adsorption between the fibers and the electrode surface. Only the sensor with bottom electrodes had all three adsorption sites and, accordingly, its response was higher relative to other gas sensors.
In another study related to detection of 1-buthylamine, hierarchical nanosheet-assembled V2O5 microflowers were hydrothermally synthesized. The gas sensor showed a higher response (~3 times) to 1- butylamine than the commercial V2O5 particles at 300 °C. The higher response of the flower-like V2O5 particles was related to the higher surface area and the unique structure of synthesized particles. The high selectivity of the V2O5 microflower sensor to 1-butylamime was related to the selective oxidation of 1-butylamine on the surface of V2O5. In fact, selective oxidation of primary amines is possible in the presence of vanadic acids. The V2O5 particles showed vanadic acids-like behavior due to interaction between the water molecules on the surface of the sensor, and ultimately this led to better selective oxidation of 1-butylamine, resulting in a higher response to 1- buthylamine than other tested gases [49].
Yang et al. synthesized flower-like hierarchical V2O5 nanostructures by a hydrothermal method (Figure 2a–d) for 1-butylamine sensing applications [47]. At 140 °C, the sensor showed a response (Ra/Rg) of 2.6 to 100 ppm 1-buthylamine with a fast response time of 6 s. On the one hand, the peculiar morphology of the sensing layer with an open structure and high surface area facilitated the adsorption and diffusion of the oxygen and 1-buthylamine. On the other hand, the intercalation of ammonium ions into the layered structures of V2O5 affected the sensing response, where the distances between the layers were changed upon ammonia intercalation, contributing to the resistance change of the gas sensor [47].
The effect of the crystallization temperature on the gas response of V2O5 NFs was investigated by Modaferri et al. [50]. They successfully prepared V2O5 NFs using an electrospinning technique. The samples were crystallized at 300, 400 and 500 °C. The sensor crystallized at 400 °C showed the highest response to ammonia gas at 250 °C. The improved sensing response was related to the more porous structure of this sensor. With increasing sensor porosity, more adsorption sites can be provided for the NH3 molecules. Furthermore, gas molecules can effectively diffuse into the deeper parts of the gas sensor and increases the reactions with already adsorbed oxygen species. Overall, a higher response is expected for more porous structures.
Methane (CH4) is one of the greenhouse gases which is much more effective at heat trapping in the atmosphere than CO2. Furthermore, the leakage of methane from pipelines is highly dangerous for human beings Therefore, the detection of CH4 is important from different aspects [51]. The morphology dependence of V2O5 to methane gas was investigated for V2O5 nanostructures. Using a magnetron sputtering technique and under different sputtering powers of 100, 125 and 150 W, V2O5 nanostructures were synthesized with three different morphologies, where the morphology of films deposited at 100 W was NR, 125 was nanourchin and 150 W was nanoflower [52]. The resistance of NRs, nano-urchins and nanoflowers were ∼15.4, 8.8 and 1.8 MΩ at room temperature (24 °C) as shown in Figure 3a. The nanoflower sensor revealed a higher sensor response among all the gas sensors at 100 °C. The nanoflower sensor displayed a higher sensing response (ΔR/Ra) of 11.2% than NRs and the nano-urchin which had sensing responses of about 8.9 and 9.1% to 500 ppm CH4 (Figure 3b–d). Enhanced response was related to the morphology of nanoflowers which were comprised of nanosheets as building blocks that eventually provided more active sites for CH4. Furthermore, they had some voids which led to faster transfer of gases and gas sensing reactions. However, both NRs and nano-urchins had dense structures, limiting their adsorption sites as well as effective diffusion of gases to the depth parts of sensors. The good selectivity to CH4 relative to H2 gas was due to the difference in bond dissociation energies of C–H (413 kJ/mol) and H–H (432 kJ/mol). Owing to weaker bond dissociation energy of C–H than H–H, the reaction between C–H and V2O5 was easier and hence the sensor response was higher to CH4 gas relative to H2 gas.
Xylene is a colorless and toxic gas which is widely used in industry mostly as solvent. However, exposure to high concentrations of xylene is dangerous for human beings and, therefore, maximum allowed exposure to xylene is set to 100 ppm for 8 h [53]. Cao et al. fabricated flower-like V2O5 nanostructures via hydrothermal method for gas sensing studies (Figure 4) [54]. The optimized sensor exhibited a response of 2.3 to 100 ppm xylene at 300 °C. In addition, the response time and recovery time were 44 and 78 s, respectively. Flower-like V2O5 with mesoporous morphology, was contained in nanoneedles, which provided a high surface area and numerous pathways to xylene gas molecules. However, its selectivity was not excellent, as its response to xylene was less than two times that of the response to buthylamine.
Helium (He) is a non-flammable gas and the second lightest element on earth, hence it is used in aero structures. Since it is an inert gas, its detection is extremely difficult with common gas sensors [55]. However, He has a relatively low atomic mass and small size, which greatly facilitates its diffusion along the sensing layer. In an interesting study, a He gas sensor was introduced by Chauhan et al. [55]. They synthesized V2O5·1.6H2O nanowires(NWs) and V2O5·1.6H2O nanostars with BET surface areas of 3.58 m2/g and 8.38 m2/g, respectively. In fact, nanostar shapes consisted of sharp edges and therefore offered a higher surface area and a higher response, while NWs were stacked together, limiting the gas diffusion and exhibiting a lower response. Hydrated V2O5 contained both vanadium ions (V4+ and V5+) which act as hopping sites for Polaron. The interaction of helium molecules with the V2O5·1.6H2O nanostructures decreased the average hopping distance, resulting in an increase in the conductivity of the sensing layer. The hopping distance decreased due to an increase in hopping sites in the presence of He gas. This was due to the fact that the He gas molecule itself acted as a hopping site for charge transfer (Figure 5).
Spray pyrolysis is a simple and inexpensive deposition technique which is able to deposit a large surface area with good uniformity. The effect of substrate temperature on the final sensing performance of V2O5 films to NO2 gas deposited by the spay pyrolysis technique was investigated [2]. The prepared solutions were sprayed onto the glass substrate at different substrate temperatures of 350, 400, 450 and 500 °C (Figure 6). Gas sensing studies showed that the V2O5 thin film sensor deposited at 400 °C had the highest response to NO2 gas at 200 °C.
At high substrate temperatures, the formation of reduced V2O5-x species led to formation of oxygen vacancies. These oxygen vacancies enhanced adsorption of NO2 gas molecules on the sensing layer. However, for the samples deposited at higher temperature, even though it was expected that more oxygen vacancies be produced, particle sizes also were larger. Therefore, the sample deposited at 400 °C, showed the optimal values of oxygen vacancies along with high surface area, which finally resulted in the best sensing response to NO2 gas.
In another similar study, the V2O5 NRs were spray deposited onto the glass substrates at 400 °C using VCl3 solutions with different concentrations of 10 to 40 mM. The V2O5 NRs deposited with 30 mM solution exhibited the highest gas response of 24.2% to 100 ppm NO2 gas at 200 °C with response and recovery times of 13 s and 140 s, respectively. The improved sensing response of the optimized gas sensor was attributed to high crystallinity of sensing layer and the formation of a porous structure in which diffusion of gas molecules was facilitated into the depth parts of gas sensor [56].
In another study related to spray pyrolysis deposition technique, nanostructured V2O5 thin films were spay deposited on the glass substrates. Initial solutions had different concentrations of 0.025 to 0.1 M [57]. It was found that the sensor fabricated from the solution with initial concentration of 0.1 M had the highest sensing performance. In this sensor, a high surface area due to high surface roughness was obtained which significantly increased the response to xylene gas. Initially in air, oxygen molecules were adsorbed on the surface of the gas sensor as follows:
O 2 ( g ) O 2 ( a d s )
O 2 ( a d s ) + e O 2   ( a d s )
O 2 ( a d s ) + e 2 O ( a d s )
O ( a d s ) + e O 2 ( a d s )
Then, the following reaction occurred between the xylene and adsorbed oxygen species:
C 8 H 10 + 21 O 2 16 C O 2 + 10 H 2 O + 21 e
Accordingly, the conductivity of the sensor significantly increased, and led to the appearance of a sensing signal. To demonstrate the formation of CO2 as a byproduct of sensing reactions, a lime water test was conducted. Initially, a solution of saturated Ca(OH)2 with a clear color was prepared. Upon introduction of xylene into the gas chamber, due to the conversion of saturated Ca(OH)2 into CaCO3, its color was changed to milky, confirming the release of CO2 as a byproduct of sensing reaction [53].
Jin et al. [58], prepared random alignment V2O5 NW and V2O5 NW microyarn gas sensors for ethanol sensing studies. The response of the microyarn gas sensors reached the maximum value of 9.09 for 1000 ppm ethanol at 330 °C, which was ~3.5 times higher than that of the random alignment NWs (Figure 7). For the random oriented NWs, electrons in their pathways encountered a network of NWs. Accordingly, they should overcome two potential barriers namely (i) electrode–V2O5 barriers, and (ii) V2O5 –V2O5 homojunctions barriers. For the microyarn gas sensor, the agglomeration of NWs was prevented effectively, resulting in the exposing of a larger surface area to target gas. In addition, the orderly assembled yarns provided a direct path for flow of electrons, leading to a high response to ethanol gas.
Plasma focus (PF) is a pulse plasma device which generates high temperatures and high density of a plasma column very fast. PF has a high deposition rate, energetic deposition process as well as the ability of working in the presence of reactive gases. In an attempt, V2O5 thin films were prepared by the PF technique using different shots [59]. It was found that the surface morphology of deposited samples had a key role in the gas response of deposited films. A V2O5 thin film prepared with ten shots exhibited the highest H2 gas response among all the gas sensors at 275 °C. The higher response of the optimized gas sensor can be related to the presence of more oxygen vacancies as well as higher surface area as a result of rougher morphology.
Effect of V2O5 film thickness also has been investigated. The nanocrystalline V2O5 thin films with NR-like morphology and different thicknesses of 423, 559, 694 and 730 nm were deposited onto the glass substrates using a spray pyrolysis technique. The V2O5 film with a thickness 559 nm revealed the highest response (41% to 100 ppm NO2 at 200 °C) due to the higher surface area [60]. This study shows the need for the optimization of film thickness to achieve the best sensing performance.
Table 1 presents the gas sensing characteristics of pristine V2O5 gas sensors, where different morphologies of V2O5 prepared using various methods have been successful for sensing of different gases.

3. Decorated/Doped V2O5 Gas Sensors

Based on the above section about pristine V2O5 gas sensors, pristine V2O5 nanostructures suffer from low sensitivity and selectivity, which hinder their applications for sensing applications [61]. Accordingly, different strategies, such as p-n heterojunction formation [62], n-n heterojunction formation [63,64] and noble metal decoration [65] have been proposed to enhance their sensing properties. In the following section, we will discuss different aspects of such gas sensors based on V2O5 nanostructures.
V2O5 decoration is a good strategy to enhance the sensing properties of gas sensors. V2O5-decorated α-Fe2O3 composite NRs were prepared by an electrospinning technique and they had a high surface area of 30.5 m2/g. The composite exhibited a response (Ra/Rg) of 9 to 100 ppm diethylamine along with good selectivity to diethylamine gas and a fast response time of 2 s at 350 °C [66]. Improved sensing performance was related to the formation of V2O5-Fe2O3 heterojunctions and catalytic effect of V2O5 to diethylamine.
In another study, Ko et al. [67], decorated V2O5 nanoislands on the surface of SnO2 NWs using different cycles of atomic layer deposition (ALD) and the effect of ALD cycles was investigated. It was found that the sensor with 50 ALD cycles showed the highest response to NO2 gas. In particular its response to 200 ppb NO2 was ~3.7 at 250 °C. Figure 8a,b displays the energy band diagrams of the sensing layer, before and after equilibrium. V2O5 nanoislands on the SnO2 NWs improved the sensing response by generation of depletion layers at the V2O5/SnO2 interface and modulation of the SnO2 conduction channel. However, the excess amount of V2O5 nanoislands deposited by a higher number of ALD cycles, resulted in the decrease in sensor response. The density functional theory (DFT) calculations shown in Figure 8c, regarding NO2 adsorption energies of both the SnO2 (1 0 1) and V2O5 (0 0 1) planes were −1.5 eV and 1.0 eV, respectively. Thus, it was concluded that the SnO2 surface was more favorable for adsorption of NO2 relative to V2O5. Therefore, the excess amount of V2O5 on the surface of SnO2 (Figure 8d), resulted in a significant decrease in the gas response due to limited exposure of SnO2 to NO2 gas.
Porous silicon (PS) is a good candidate for sensing studies due to its offering of a high surface area and a porous structure. In addition it can be simply prepared by a chemical etching process [68]. Therefore, composites between V2O5 and PS can be promising for gas sensing studies. In a relevant study, thin V films were decorated on the PS by sputtering at different times of 30 and 60 min and then, the samples were annealed at 600 °C [69]. The PS/V2O5 NRs structure provided a better response than pristine PS at 25 °C, and the sensor sputtered for 60 min exhibited the highest response of 7.4 to 2 ppm NO2 gas. Both the PS and V2O5 NRs had plenty of dangling bonds, oxygen vacancies and defects, leading to high adsorption of oxygen molecules even at room temperature. In the interfaces between PS and V2O5, p-n heterojunctions formed and, upon exposure to NO2 gas, the significant modulation of electrical resistance in the heterojunctions led to the appearance of a sensing signal.
Graphene and its derivations such as graphene oxide and reduced graphene oxide have high surface areas and unique electrical properties which can be beneficial for gas sensing studies [70,71]. The initial resistance of the GO is high, limiting its practical applications in pristine form [72,73]. However, after the reduction GO to RGO, there are some defects, vacancies and functional groups which are useful for gas sensing applications [74]. In a relevant study, an RGO surface was decorated with Mn3O4 and V2O5 NOs via a hydrothermal method for detection of H2 gas at 30 °C. The sensor showed a high response (ΔR/Ra × 100) of 174% to 50 ppm H2 gas at room temperature. The sheet-like structure of RGO provided a large surface area for gas sensing reactions. In addition, because of the formation of p-n (RGO-V2O5) and p-p (RGO-Mn3O4) heterojunctions, significant modulation of resistance in the presence of H2 occurred, resulting in the generation of a sensing signal [75]. In another study, a V2O5 film was prepared by a reactive sputtering technique and then, RGO was decorated over the V2O5 thin film by a drop casting method for NO2 sensing studies. The sensor showed a response of 50.7% to 100 ppm NO2 gas at 150 °C. However, its recovery time was long (778 s). Formation and modulation of the p-n heterojunction at the interface of RGO and V2O5 was the main reason for the detection of NO2 gas. Moreover, the presence of active sites such as oxygen functional groups on the RGO surface improved the sensing response [76].
Not only can V2O5-decoration be a useful technique to enhance the gas sensing properties, but decoration of other metal oxides or noble metals on the surface of gas sensor can also be a good technique to improve the gas sensing properties of V2O5-based gas sensors. A P-type CuO with excellent catalytic activity is extensively used for sensing studies [77]. The work function of CuO is 5.3 eV, which is different to that of V2O5 (4.7 eV). Therefore, when heterojunctions form between the CuO and V2O5, enhanced gas response can be expected. In this context, hollow nanostructures using CuO decorated V2O5 nano-strings of pearls were fabricated through an electrospinning method. The V2O5/CuO sensors demonstrated a response (Ra/Rg ) of 8.8 to 500 ppm acetone at 440 °C, which was more than three times higher than that of bare V2O5 NFs. The improved performance was related to the generation of CuO/V2O5 p-n heterojunctions, which provided plenty of resistance modulation sources and upon exposure to acetone gas higher response was resulted [78].
In another relevant study, CuO NPs-decorated V2O5 NWs were fabricated by a two-step process, by combination of hydrothermal and wet-deposition methods [79]. The H2S response of the sensor was 31.86 to 23 ppm of H2S gas at 220 °C. The high response was related to the p-n junction formed at the interface between CuO and V2O5 along with conversion of CuO to metallic-like CuS. In air, the potential barriers were formed in the interfaces between two materials. Upon injection of H2S, the CuO was converted to CuS with metallic-like conductivity. Accordingly, the height of the junction was significantly decreased, resulting in great modulation of electrical resistance and a high response to H2S resulted.
SnO2 NPs-decorated V2O5 NWs were realized by a two-step mild hydrothermal route for sensing applications [80]. The sensor showed a response of ~16 to 1000 ppm ethanol which was three times higher than that of pristine V2O5 NWs. The higher response of the gas sensor was explained on the basis of formation of heterojunctions between the SnO2 and V2O5, formation of V2O5- V2O5 homojunctions due to networked nature of synthesized V2O5 NWs, high intrinsic sensing properties of SnO2 NPs and efficient electron transport along the conduction band of V2O5 NWs.
Fe2O3-decorated V2O5 nanotubes were fabricated using a two-step rheological phase reaction and hydrothermal synthesis for sensing studies. The sensor exhibited a response (Ra/Rg) of 2.2 to 1000 ppm ethanol which was slightly higher than the response to toluene gas od the same concentration with a response of 1.5 at 270 °C [81]. However, the authors did not report selectivity of gas sensors over different gases.
Ozone (O3) is a strong oxidizing gas that can affect the human body severely. TiO2 NPs were decorated on V2O5 NWs via a hydrothermal method for ozone sensing studies. The pristine TiO2 sensor was not sensitive to O3 gas. The sensor showed a response of 2.6 (∆R/Ra) to 1.25 ppm O3 gas at 300 °C, while almost no response was recorded for the pristine TiO2 sensor. When the sensor was exposed to O3 gas, following reactions took place [82]:
O 3 ( g ) + e O 3 ( a d s )
O 3 ( a d s ) + O ( a d s ) + 2 e O 2 ( g ) + 2 O 2 ( a d s )
As a result, electrons were extracted from the surface of the gas sensor and changed the height of potential barriers formed between TiO2 and V2O5. This led to a generation of a sensing signal to O3 gas.
Noble metal decoration is also a good strategy to enhance sensing properties [83]. V2O5 nanoflowers were synthesized via a hydrothermal route and then they were decorated with Au NPs at different loading levels of 0.5, 1.5, 2.5, 3.5, and 5 mol%. The optimal gas sensor with a 3.5 mol% Au NPs showed a response (Ra/Rg) of ~7.3 to 100 ppm 1-buthylamine at 240 °C, while the response of the pristine gas sensor to the same concentration of 1-buthylamine gas was only 3 at 300 °C. Since there was negligible difference in the surface area among all samples, the enhanced gas sensing response for the sensor with 3.5 mol% Au NPs was related to the chemical and electronic effects of Au [84].
In another study using the decoration of noble metals on the surface of V2O5, Sanger et al. [85], deposited a Pd/V2O5 thin film by DC magnetron reactive sputtering for H2 gas sensing studies. The deposition of V and Pd were performed at 300 °C for 60 min and 10 s, respectively. A very fast response within 6 s, recovery time of 21 s and a response of 5 was recorded for 100 ppm of H2.
A gasochromic mechanism was proposed for H2 gas sensing, where, based on XPS studies, the formation of vanadium bronze (HxV2O5) was confirmed by an increase in the intensity of the V4+ peaks. Furthermore, Pd dissociated hydrogen molecules into atomic hydrogen and subsequently, they were spilled over onto the V2O5 surface, to react with adsorbed oxygen species. Thus, V2O5 was converted to vanadium bronze, with a simultaneous color change from light yellow to light blue.
Generally, only one type of material is used for decoration. However, co-decoration can have more effect on the gas response of gas sensors. For example, it was found that co-decoration of V2O5 and Pd on the surface of SnO2 NPs can significantly enhance both the response of gas sensor to H2 gas and at the same time, it can decrease the recovery time of the gas sensor [86]. It was reported that during the recovery time, re-oxidization of V2O5 led to increase in the recovery time. However, the presence of Pd, significantly decreased the recovery time due to the fact that Pd not only was effective in hydroxyl desorption and oxygen re-adsorption on the SnO2 surface but also it significantly accelerated the re-oxidization of V2O5. Accordingly, co-loading of V2O5 and Pd resulted in a complementarity effect, which improves the sensor response and recovery time at the same time.
Benzene (C6H6) is extensively used as an organic solvent. However, it is a toxic substance, leading to leukemia and lymphomas diseases [87]. V2O5 as dopant has been rarely used for gas sensing studies. A series of pristine and V2O5-doped SnO2 NFs (V2O5/SnO2 = 0.5, 1, 2.5 and 5 mol%) were synthesized via electrospinning for benzene sensing studies [88]. It was reported that the sensor with V2O5/SnO2 = 1 exhibited the highest response to benzene (6.32 at 325 °C to 25 ppm). V2O5 catalyzed benzene into maleic anhydride and activated the benzene ring, resulting in better interaction with adsorbed oxygen species. However, a decrease in gas response for higher doping levels was related to the evaluation of a more compact structure, leading to lower adsorption sites and a lower sensing response.
Table 2 shows the gas sensing properties of decorated or doped V2O5-based gas sensors, where different synthesis methods along with different morphologies and various materials have been reported to realize gas sensors for the sensing of toxic gases.

4. Nanocomposites/Nanohybrids of V2O5 Gas Sensors

Core-shell (C-S) nanocomposites are among the most promising structures for gas sensing studies, as in these structures the interfaces between two different materials are maximized, resulting in significant modulation of electrical resistance upon exposure to target gases [89,90,91]. Fu et al. [40], synthesized V2O5-TiO2 core-shell (C-S) NPs for NH3 studies. For pristine V2O5 NPs, the surface area was only ∼16 m2/g with a pore size of 12.9 nm, while the BET surface area of V2O5@TiO2 C-S NPs was greatly increased to ∼151 m2/g, and the average pore size was ∼6.4 nm. Thus, the significant increase in surface area was an advantage for C-S NPs, which directly affected the gas sensing studies. The C-S sensor showed a response (Ra/Rg) of 8.6 to 100 ppm ammonia at 365 °C. Upon intimate contact between the V2O5 and TiO2, electrons moved from TiO2 to V2O5, resulting in the creation of an electron depletion layer on both sides of the TiO2 shell layer. Upon injection of NH3 gas into the gas chamber, the electrons released back caused the narrowing of the electron depletion layers which finally modulated the electrical resistances of the gas sensor. Moreover, based on DFT calculations, the NH3 molecule showed the lowest adsorption energy (−1.04 eV) on the anatase TiO2 (101) surface, which explained the higher selectivity of the gas sensor to NH3 among other tested gases. The optimal sensing temperature of the gas sensor was registered at 365 °C. The reactions on the surface of TiO2 can be shown as follows:
O 2 + 4 e 2 O 2
2 N H 3 + 3 O 2 N 2 + 3 H 2 O + 6 e
2 N H 3 + 4 O 2 N 2 O + 3 H 2 O + 8 e
2 N H 3 + 5 O 2 2 N O   + 3 H 2 O + 10 e
Thus, more electrons can be released when NxO (x = 1, 2), demonstrating the high response toward NH3 at elevated temperatures (>300 °C).
In another study related to C-S nanocomposites, V2O5/In2O3 C-S NRs were prepared using a solid solution synthesis method, followed by a hydrothermal method. In2O3 as shell, led to the increase in surface active sites for gas adsorption. The sensor showed a response (Ra/Rg) of 14 to 200 ppm n-propylamine at 190 °C. Higher selectivity of the sensor to n-propylamine was explained on the basis of selective oxidation of n-propylamine.
Additionally, presence of the two types of materials with different reduction-oxidation and acid-base properties affected the selectivity of the gas sensor to n-propylamine [92].
Combination of MoO3, which has layered structure with V2O5 with high catalytic activity can be a good strategy for enhanced gas sensing performance of the MoO3-V2O5 composite. The (MoO3)1-x(V2O5)x thin films with x = 0.2, 0.4, 0.6 and 0.8 were prepared using a chemical spray pyrolysis method. For (MoO3)0.4(V2O5)0.6 thin film, a gas response of 80% at 200 °C to 100 ppm NO2 gas was recorded [93]. The sensing layer with a sheet-like morphology and the presence of voids in its layered structure, provides a lot of adsorption sites for NO2 gas molecules. In addition, NO2 gas was able to diffuse into the depth parts of gas sensor, resulting in more interaction between the gas molecules and already adsorbed oxygen molecules. In another study which was conducted by the same group, Pd was decorated on the optimal gas sensor, (MoO3)0.4(V2O5)0.6 and a higher gas response resulted due to the catalytic effect of Pd and formation of different heterojunctions [94].
Use of conducting polymers (CPs) can greatly decrease the sensing temperature of the resultant composite material. In this regard, Diniz et al. [95] used a poly(o-methoxyaniline) (POMA)–V2O5 hybrid composite film for NH3 detection. POMA has an OCH3 group which can improve the processability of POMA [96]. The function of V2O5 was to enhance the structural stability during the doping and dedoping of POMA when exposing it to NH3 gas. The sensing mechanism is explained as follows. A p-n heterojunction was formed between the POMA–V2O5 hybrid and, by interaction with NH3 gas, the wide of depletion layers and height of potential barriers decreased, resulting in resistance change of the hybrid composite film [95].
Even low concentrations of NH3 can negatively affect skin and human respiratory organs. This led to the setting of the indoor exposure limit of NH3 to 25 ppm [97]. Au-loaded flower-like V2O5/CuWO4 nanocomposites were synthesized for NH3 studies. The sensor showed a response (Ra/Rg) of 2.7 to 5 ppm NH3 at 150 °C, which was higher than the response to other gases. In addition to promising effects of heterojunctions formed between different sensing materials, the Au NPs facilitated the electron flow among the sensing materials and the NH3 and thus a short response time of 35 s was recorded. In addition, Au NPs catalytically increase the dissociative adsorption of O2 molecules as O species and, in a so-called spillover process, atomic oxygen species moved to the surface of V2O5/CuWO4, leading to wider depletion layer and acceleration of the gas reactions on the surface of the sensing layer [98].
Zhang et al. [99] developed a series of SnO2/V2O5 composites for sensing of benzene, toluene, ethyl benzene, and xylene (BTEX) gases. At 270 °C, the sensor with 10 wt% V2O5 showed the highest response to BTEX gases. It was reported that V2O5 catalyzed oxidation of benzene into a maleic anhydride, implying that V2O5 was able to activate the benzene ring, then benzene reacted with the absorbed oxygen species easily on the surface of SnO2. The sensor response was decreased for the sensor with 20 wt% V2O5, which could be due to the fact that the intrinsic response of SnO2 is higher than that of V2O5. In fact, when there is too much V2O5, the adsorption sites on the surfaces of SnO2 decrease, leading to a decrease in sensor response [99].
The effect of the nature of polymer (PVP and PVAc) used for the electrospinning process on the sensing response of of V2O5-based gas sensors was investigated. At 260 °C, the V2O5/PVP sensor, showed a response (ΔR/Ra × 100) of ~7 to 0.8 ppm NH3 gas which was slightly higher than that of the V2O5/PVAc sensor. It was reported that the V2O5/PVP network was constituted of fibers with a smaller diameter which resulted in larger resistance modulation of the gas sensor. In fact, a larger part of the diameter of fibers with smaller diameters was depleted from electrons and this resulted in more intense resistance modulation upon exposure to target gas [100].
Layered V2O5/ZnV2O6 nanocomposites were synthesized via a chemical route for ethanol sensing applications [101]. The sensor revealed a response of 4.3 to 100 ppm ethanol at 240 °C. The enhanced sensing properties were related to high mobility of electrons in the layered structure of the gas sensor along with the formation and subsequent modulation of potential barriers between V2O5 and ZnV2O6 in the presence of ethanol gas. Furthermore, TiO2/V2O5 branched NFs were fabricated by an electrospinning process. The sensor showed a high response (Ra/Rg) of 24.6 to 100 ppm ethanol at 350 °C which was attributed to the high surface area of the branched sensor (33.6 m2/g) and the synergistic effects between TiO2 and V2O5 upon intimate contact [102].
In another study, the effect of ZnO addition on the room temperature toluene sensing properties of ZnO/V2O5 nanocomposite thin films was systematically studied. ZnO/V2O5 nanocomposites were deposited using spray pyrolysis for the detection of toluene at 27 °C [103]. The response to toluene was improved by the addition of V2O5 to the ZnO thin film and the sensor with a composition of 70 wt% ZnO showed a response of 2.3 to 400 ppm toluene which was the highest response among the gas sensors. In fact, in a part form formation of heterojunctions, the presence of V2O5 led to further adsorption of oxygen, and ZnO with intrinsic high sensing properties and high electron mobility also contributed to the sensing signal. Table 3 exhibits the sensing properties of various V2O5-based composite gas sensors, where different materials along with various morphologies have been used for sensing of different gases.

5. Conclusions and Outlook

In this review paper, we discuss different aspects of V2O5-based gas sensors. In general, pristine V2O5 gas sensors can show response to a variety of gases. In pristine form, V2O5 gas sensors with different morphologies can be synthesized by using physical methods such as reactive sputtering or by using chemical methods such as hydrothermal and sol–gel methods. Depending on the surface chemistry, morphology and sensing temperatures, the pristine V2O5 gas sensors show different response values to a specific gas. However, in general, the response and selectivity of pristine V2O5 gas sensors is poor. To enhance sensing performance of pristine gas sensors, noble metal decoration can be a good strategy. Noble metals such as Au, Pd and Pt can significantly enhance not only the response of gas sensors, but also the selectivity to a specific gas. However, less attention has been paid to systematically optimize the amount of noble metals on the surface of V2O5 and most of researchers only investigated the effect of a specific amount of noble metals on the sensing performance. In addition, co-decoration can be also a good strategy to further enhance the sensing properties such as response, selectivity and response and recovery times.
Formation of heterojunctions with n- or p-type materials is another strategy to increase the overall sensing performance. This strategy may be more cost-effective than noble metal decoration. Furthermore, composite making can be performed in one-step avoiding complex procedures associated with noble metal decoration. The height of heterojunction barriers changes upon exposure of gas sensors to target gases, leading to enhanced gas response.
Unfortunately, some aspects of V2O5-based gas sensors have not investigated yet. For example, the effects of ion-implantation and UV illumination have not reported yet. Furthermore, there is no report about operation of V2O5-based gas sensors in self-heating mode. Moreover, less attention has been paid to nanohybrids between V2O5 and CPs, which can significantly decrease the sensing temperature. In spite of great efforts and advances related to the V2O5-based gas sensors, the selectivity issue is still a serious problem and more works are necessary to solve it. Therefore, it is expected that future studies related to V2O5-based gas sensors will be directed to explore these expected V2O5-based gas sensors.

Author Contributions

Investigation, V.A.; conceptualization and writing—original draft preparation, A.M., H.R.; M.H.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

Thanks to the support of Shiraz University of Technology.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Le, T.K.; Kang, M.; Kim, S.W. A review on the optical characterization of v2o5 micro-nanostructures. Ceram. Int. 2019, 45, 15781–15798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Mane, A.A.; Maldar, P.S.; Dabhole, S.H.; Nikam, S.A.; Moholkar, A.V. Effect of substrate temperature on physicochemical and gas sensing properties of sprayed orthorhombic v2o5 thin films. Measurement 2019, 131, 223–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Bouzidi, A.; Benramdane, N.; Bresson, S.; Mathieu, C.; Desfeux, R.; Marssi, M.E. X-ray and raman study of spray pyrolysed vanadium oxide thin films. Vib. Spectrosc. 2011, 57, 182–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Su, Q.; Lan, W.; Wang, Y.Y.; Liu, X.Q. Structural characterization of β-v2o5 films prepared by dc reactive magnetron sputtering. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2009, 255, 4177–4179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ramana, C.; Hussain, O.; Naidu, B.S.; Reddy, P. Spectroscopic characterization of electron-beam evaporated v2o5 thin films. Thin Solid Film 1997, 305, 219–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Laubach, S.; Schmidt, P.C.; Thißen, A.; Fernandez-Madrigal, F.J.; Wu, Q.-H.; Jaegermann, W.; Klemm, M.; Horn, S. Theoretical and experimental determination of the electronic structure of v2o5, reduced v2o5− x and sodium intercalated nav2o5. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2007, 9, 2564–2576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Aawani, E.; Memarian, N.; Dizaji, H.R. Synthesis and characterization of reduced graphene oxide–v2o5 nanocomposite for enhanced photocatalytic activity under different types of irradiation. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 2019, 125, 8–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Rathika, R.; Kovendhan, M.; Joseph, D.P.; Pachaiappan, R.; Kumar, A.S.; Vijayarangamuthu, K.; Venkateswaran, C.; Asokan, K.; Jeyakumar, S.J. Tailoring the properties of spray deposited v2o5 thin films using swift heavy ion beam irradiation. Nucl. Eng. Technol. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Hou, T.-F.; Johar, M.A.; Boppella, R.; Hassan, M.A.; Patil, S.J.; Ryu, S.-W.; Lee, D.-W. Vertically aligned one-dimensional zno/v2o5 core–shell hetero-nanostructure for photoelectrochemical water splitting. J. Energy Chem. 2020, 49, 262–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Slewa, L.H.; Abbas, T.A.; Ahmed, N.M. Effect of sn doping and annealing on the morphology, structural, optical, and electrical properties of 3d (micro/nano) v2o5 sphere for high sensitivity ph-egfet sensor. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2020, 305, 127515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Abd-Alghafour, N.M.; Ahmed, N.M.; Hassan, Z.; Almessiere, M.A.; Bououdina, M.; Al-Hardan, N.H. High sensitivity extended gate effect transistor based on v2o5 nanorods. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2017, 28, 1364–1369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Yin, Z.; Xu, J.; Ge, Y.; Jiang, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, Y.; Sun, Y.; Hou, S.; Shang, Y.; Zhang, Y. Synthesis of v2o5 microspheres by spray pyrolysis as cathode material for supercapacitors. Mater. Res. Express 2018, 5, 036306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Deepak Raj, P.; Gupta, S.; Sridharan, M. Studies on nanostructured v2o5/v/v2o5 films for un-cooled ir detector application. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2016, 27, 7494–7500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Abd-Alghafour, N.M.; Ahmed, N.M.; Hassan, Z. Fabrication and characterization of v2o5 nanorods based metal–semiconductor–metal photodetector. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2016, 250, 250–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kim, D.; Yun, J.; Lee, G.; Ha, J.S. Fabrication of high performance flexible micro-supercapacitor arrays with hybrid electrodes of mwnt/v2o5 nanowires integrated with a sno2 nanowire uv sensor. Nanoscale 2014, 6, 12034–12041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Singh, N.; Umar, A.; Singh, N.; Fouad, H.; Alothman, O.Y.; Haque, F.Z. Highly sensitive optical ammonia gas sensor based on sn doped v2o5 nanoparticles. Mater. Res. Bull. 2018, 108, 266–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Santos, M.C.; Hamdan, O.H.C.; Valverde, S.A.; Guerra, E.M.; Bianchi, R.F. Synthesis and characterization of v2o5/pani thin films for application in amperometric ammonia gas sensors. Org. Electron. 2019, 65, 116–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wang, C.; Li, X.; Yuan, Y.; Wang, B.; Huang, J.; Xia, F.; Zhang, H.; Xiao, J. Effects of sintering temperature on sensing properties of v2o5-wo3-tio2 electrode for potentiometric ammonia sensor. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2017, 241, 268–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Alam, M.M.; Uddin, M.T.; Asiri, A.M.; Rahman, M.M.; Islam, M.A. Development of reproducible thiourea sensor with binary sno2/v2o5 nanomaterials by electrochemical method. Arab. J. Chem. 2020, 13, 5406–5416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Rajesh, K.; Santhanalakshmi, J. Design and development of graphene intercalated v2o5 nanosheets based electrochemical sensors for effective determination of potentially hazardous 3,5–dichlorophenol. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2017, 199, 497–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhang, H.; Zhang, L.; Hu, J.; Cai, P.; Lv, Y. A cataluminescence gas sensor based on nanosized v2o5 for tert-butyl mercaptan. Talanta 2010, 82, 733–738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Karthikeyan, P.S.; Dhivya, P.; Deepak Raj, P.; Sridharan, M. V2o5 thin film for 2-propanol vapor sensing. Mater. Today Proc. 2016, 3, 1510–1516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Imawan, C.; Steffes, H.; Solzbacher, F.; Obermeier, E. Structural and gas-sensing properties of v2o5–moo3 thin films for h2 detection. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2001, 77, 346–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Chen, C.L.; Dong, C.L.; Ho, Y.K.; Chang, C.C.; Wei, D.H.; Chan, T.C.; Chen, J.L.; Jang, W.L.; Hsu, C.C.; Kumar, K.; et al. Electronic and atomic structures of gasochromic v2o5 films. EPL (Europhys. Lett.) 2013, 101, 17006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Tadeo, I.J.; Parasuraman, R.; Krupanidhi, S.B.; Umarji, A.M. Enhanced humidity responsive ultrasonically nebulised v2o5 thin films. Nano Express 2020, 1, 010005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Schneider, K.; Lubecka, M.; Czapla, A. V2o5 thin films for gas sensor applications. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2016, 236, 970–977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Vasanth Raj, D.; Ponpandian, N.; Mangalaraj, D.; Viswanathan, C. Effect of annealing and electrochemical properties of sol–gel dip coated nanocrystalline v2o5 thin films. Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 2013, 16, 256–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Gandasiri, R.; Sreelatha, C.J.; Nagaraju, P.; Vijayakumar, Y. Effect of annealing temperature on micro-structural, optical and electrical characterization of nanostructured v2o5 thin films prepared by spray pyrolysis technique. Phys. B Condens. Matter 2019, 572, 220–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Thangarasu, R.; Thangavel, E.; Chandrasekaran, J.; Balasundaram, O.N. Synthesis, characterization and gas sensing performance of v2o5 nano-structure on pet substrate. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2019, 30, 4238–4249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Yıldırım, M.A.; Tuna Yıldırım, S.; Çağirtekin, A.O.; Karademir, M.; Karaduman Er, I.; Coşkun, A.; Ateş, A.; Acar, S. The effect of deposition time on the structural, morphological and h2s gas sensing properties of the v2o5 nanostructures deposited by hydrothermal method. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2019, 30, 12215–12223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Mirzaei, A.; Leonardi, S.G.; Neri, G. Detection of hazardous volatile organic compounds (vocs) by metal oxide nanostructures-based gas sensors: A review. Ceram. Int. 2016, 42, 15119–15141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Mirzaei, A.; Neri, G. Microwave-assisted synthesis of metal oxide nanostructures for gas sensing application: A review. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2016, 237, 749–775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Amiri, V.; Roshan, H.; Mirzaei, A.; Neri, G.; Ayesh, A.I. Nanostructured metal oxide-based acetone gas sensors: A review. Sensors 2020, 20, 3096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Mirzaei, A.; Lee, J.-H.; Majhi, S.M.; Weber, M.; Bechelany, M.; Kim, H.W.; Kim, S.S. Resistive gas sensors based on metal-oxide nanowires. J. Appl. Phys. 2019, 126, 241102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Mirzaei, A.; Janghorban, K.; Hashemi, B.; Bonyani, M.; Leonardi, S.G.; Neri, G. A novel gas sensor based on ag/fe2o3 core-shell nanocomposites. Ceram. Int. 2016, 42, 18974–18982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Mounasamy, V.; Mani, G.K.; Madanagurusamy, S. Vanadium oxide nanostructures for chemiresistive gas and vapour sensing: A review on state of the art. Microchim. Acta 2020, 187, 1–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Wu, M.; Zhang, X.; Gao, S.; Cheng, X.; Rong, Z.; Xu, Y.; Zhao, H.; Huo, L. Construction of monodisperse vanadium pentoxide hollow spheres via a facile route and triethylamine sensing property. CrystEngComm 2013, 15, 10123–10131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Wang, Y.-T.; Whang, W.-T.; Chen, C.-H. Hollow v2o5 nanoassemblies for high-performance room-temperature hydrogen sensors. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 8480–8487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Hakim, S.A.; Liu, Y.; Zakharova, G.S.; Chen, W. Synthesis of vanadium pentoxide nanoneedles by physical vapour deposition and their highly sensitive behavior towards acetone at room temperature. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 23489–23497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Li, Y.; Liu, J.; Zhang, J.; Liang, X.; Zhang, X.; Qi, Q. Deposition of in2o3 nanofibers on polyimide substrates to construct high-performance and flexible trimethylamine sensor. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Zhang, J.; Song, P.; Li, Z.; Zhang, S.; Yang, Z.; Wang, Q. Enhanced trimethylamine sensing performance of single-crystal moo3 nanobelts decorated with au nanoparticles. J. Alloys Compd. 2016, 685, 1024–1033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Wang, D.; Gu, K.; Zhao, Q.; Zhai, C.; Yang, T.; Lu, Q.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, M. Synthesis and trimethylamine sensing properties of spherical v2o5 hierarchical structures. New J. Chem. 2018, 42, 14188–14193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Meng, D.; Si, J.; Wang, M.; Wang, G.; Shen, Y.; San, X.; Meng, F. In-situ growth of v2o5 flower-like structures on ceramic tubes and their trimethylamine sensing properties. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Akande, A.A.; Mosuang, T.; Ouma, C.N.M.; Benecha, E.M.; Tesfamichael, T.; Roro, K.; Machatine, A.G.J.; Mwakikunga, B.W. Ammonia gas sensing characteristics of v2o5 nanostructures: A combined experimental and ab initio density functional theory approach. J. Alloys Compd. 2020, 821, 153565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Dhayal Raj, A.; Pazhanivel, T.; Suresh Kumar, P.; Mangalaraj, D.; Nataraj, D.; Ponpandian, N. Self assembled v2o5 nanorods for gas sensors. Curr. Appl. Phys. 2010, 10, 531–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Dhayal Raj, A.; Suresh Kumar, P.; Yang, Q.; Mangalaraj, D. Synthesis and gas sensors behavior of surfactants free v2o5 nanostructure by using a simple precipitation method. Phys. E Low-Dimens. Syst. Nanostructures 2012, 44, 1490–1494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Yang, T.; Yu, H.; Xiao, B.; Li, Z.; Zhang, M. Enhanced 1-butylamine gas sensing characteristics of flower-like v2o5 hierarchical architectures. J. Alloys Compd. 2017, 699, 921–927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Raible, I.; Burghard, M.; Schlecht, U.; Yasuda, A.; Vossmeyer, T. V2o5 nanofibres: Novel gas sensors with extremely high sensitivity and selectivity to amines. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2005, 106, 730–735. [Google Scholar]
  49. Yang, X.H.; Xie, H.; Fu, H.T.; An, X.Z.; Jiang, X.C.; Yu, A.B. Synthesis of hierarchical nanosheet-assembled v2o5 microflowers with high sensing properties towards amines. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 87649–87655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Modafferi, V.; Panzera, G.; Donato, A.; Antonucci, P.L.; Cannilla, C.; Donato, N.; Spadaro, D.; Neri, G. Highly sensitive ammonia resistive sensor based on electrospun v2o5 fibers. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2012, 163, 61–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Gross, P.-A.; Jaramillo, T.; Pruitt, B. Cyclic-voltammetry-based solid-state gas sensor for methane and other voc detection. Anal. Chem. 2018, 90, 6102–6108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Mounasamy, V.; Mani, G.K.; Ponnusamy, D.; Tsuchiya, K.; Reshma, P.R.; Prasad, A.K.; Madanagurusamy, S. Investigation on ch4 sensing characteristics of hierarchical v2o5 nanoflowers operated at relatively low temperature using chemiresistive approach. Anal. Chim. Acta 2020, 1106, 148–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Kim, B.-Y.; Ahn, J.H.; Yoon, J.-W.; Lee, C.-S.; Kang, Y.C.; Abdel-Hady, F.; Wazzan, A.A.; Lee, J.-H. Highly selective xylene sensor based on nio/nimoo4 nanocomposite hierarchical spheres for indoor air monitoring. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 34603–34611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Cao, P.; Gui, X.; Navale, S.T.; Han, S.; Xu, W.; Fang, M.; Liu, X.; Zeng, Y.; Liu, W.; Zhu, D.; et al. Design of flower-like v2o5 hierarchical nanostructures by hydrothermal strategy for the selective and sensitive detection of xylene. J. Alloys Compd. 2020, 815, 152378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Chauhan, P.S.; Bhattacharya, S. Highly sensitive v2o5·1.6h2o nanostructures for sensing of helium gas at room temperature. Mater. Lett. 2018, 217, 83–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Mane, A.A.; Suryawanshi, M.P.; Kim, J.H.; Moholkar, A.V. Fast response of sprayed vanadium pentoxide (v2o5) nanorods towards nitrogen dioxide (no2) gas detection. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2017, 403, 540–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Vijayakumar, Y.; Mani, G.K.; Ponnusamy, D.; Shankar, P.; Kulandaisamy, A.J.; Tsuchiya, K.; Rayappan, J.B.B.; Ramana Reddy, M.V. V2o5 nanofibers: Potential contestant for high performance xylene sensor. J. Alloys Compd. 2018, 731, 805–812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Jin, W.; Yan, S.; An, L.; Chen, W.; Yang, S.; Zhao, C.; Dai, Y. Enhancement of ethanol gas sensing response based on ordered v2o5 nanowire microyarns. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2015, 206, 284–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Panahi, N.; Shirazi, M.; Hosseinnejad, M.T. Fabrication, characterization and hydrogen gas sensing performance of nanostructured v2o5 thin films prepared by plasma focus method. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2018, 29, 13345–13353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Mane, A.A.; Moholkar, A.V. Effect of film thickness on no2 gas sensing properties of sprayed orthorhombic nanocrystalline v2o5 thin films. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2017, 416, 511–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Fu, H.; Jiang, X.; Yang, X.; Yu, A.; Su, D.; Wang, G. Glycothermal synthesis of assembled vanadium oxide nanostructures for gas sensing. J. Nanopart. Res. 2012, 14, 871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Qiang, X.; Hu, M.; Zhou, L.; Liang, J. Pd nanoparticles incorporated porous silicon/v2o5 nanopillars and their enhanced p-type no2-sensing properties at room temperature. Mater. Lett. 2018, 231, 194–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Bolokang, A.S.; Motaung, D.E. Reduction-oxidation of v2o5-wo3 nanostructured by ball milling and annealing: Their improved h2s gas sensing performance. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2019, 473, 164–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Liang, Y.-C.; Cheng, Y.-R. Combinational physical synthesis methodology and crystal features correlated with oxidizing gas detection ability of one-dimensional zno–vox crystalline hybrids. CrystEngComm 2015, 17, 5801–5807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Birajdar, S.N.; Hebalkar, N.Y.; Pardeshi, S.K.; Kulkarni, S.K.; Adhyapak, P.V. Ruthenium-decorated vanadium pentoxide for room temperature ammonia sensing. RSC Adv. 2019, 9, 28735–28745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Zhang, H.; Luo, Y.; Zhuo, M.; Yang, T.; Liang, J.; Zhang, M.; Ma, J.; Duan, H.; Li, Q. Diethylamine gas sensor using v2o5-decorated α-fe2o3 nanorods as a sensing material. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 6511–6515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Ko, W.C.; Kim, K.M.; Kwon, Y.J.; Choi, H.; Park, J.K.; Jeong, Y.K. Ald-assisted synthesis of v2o5 nanoislands on sno2 nanowires for improving no2 sensing performance. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2020, 509, 144821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Ozdemir, S.; Gole, J.L. The potential of porous silicon gas sensors. Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 2007, 11, 92–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Yan, W.; Hu, M.; Wang, D.; Li, C. Room temperature gas sensing properties of porous silicon/v2o5 nanorods composite. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2015, 346, 216–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Chatterjee, S.G.; Chatterjee, S.; Ray, A.K.; Chakraborty, A.K. Graphene–metal oxide nanohybrids for toxic gas sensor: A review. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2015, 221, 1170–1181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Meng, F.-L.; Guo, Z.; Huang, X.-J. Graphene-based hybrids for chemiresistive gas sensors. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2015, 68, 37–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Toda, K.; Furue, R.; Hayami, S. Recent progress in applications of graphene oxide for gas sensing: A review. Anal. Chim. Acta 2015, 878, 43–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Wang, T.; Huang, D.; Yang, Z.; Xu, S.; He, G.; Li, X.; Hu, N.; Yin, G.; He, D.; Zhang, L. A review on graphene-based gas/vapor sensors with unique properties and potential applications. Nano-Micro Lett. 2016, 8, 95–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  74. Lu, G.; Ocola, L.E.; Chen, J. Reduced graphene oxide for room-temperature gas sensors. Nanotechnology 2009, 20, 445502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Amarnath, M.; Heiner, A.; Gurunathan, K. Surface bound nanostructures of ternary r-go/ mn3o4/v2o5 system for room temperature selectivity of hydrogen gas. Ceram. Int. 2020, 46, 7336–7345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Bhati, V.S.; Sheela, D.; Roul, B.; Raliya, R.; Biswas, P.; Kumar, M.; Roy, M.S.; Nanda, K.K.; Krupanidhi, S.B.; Kumar, M. No2 gas sensing performance enhancement based on reduced graphene oxide decorated v2o5 thin films. Nanotechnology 2019, 30, 224001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Kim, J.-Y.; Lee, J.-H.; Kim, J.-H.; Mirzaei, A.; Woo Kim, H.; Kim, S.S. Realization of h2s sensing by pd-functionalized networked cuo nanowires in self-heating mode. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2019, 299, 126965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Wu, J.; Xing, X.; Zhu, Z.; Zheng, L.; Chen, J.; Wang, C.; Yang, D. Electrospun hollow cuo modified v2o5 nano-string of pearls with improved acetone sensitivity. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2019, 727, 19–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Yeh, B.-Y.; Jian, B.-S.; Wang, G.-J.; Tseng, W.J. Cuo/v2o5 hybrid nanowires for highly sensitive and selective h2s gas sensor. RSC Adv. 2017, 7, 49605–49612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Wang, R.; Yang, S.; Deng, R.; Chen, W.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, H.; Zakharova, G.S. Enhanced gas sensing properties of v2o5 nanowires decorated with sno2 nanoparticles to ethanol at room temperature. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 41050–41058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Jin, W.; Dong, B.; Chen, W.; Zhao, C.; Mai, L.; Dai, Y. Synthesis and gas sensing properties of fe2o3 nanoparticles activated v2o5 nanotubes. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2010, 145, 211–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Avansi, W.; Catto, A.C.; da Silva, L.F.; Fiorido, T.; Bernardini, S.; Mastelaro, V.R.; Aguir, K.; Arenal, R. One-dimensional v2o5/tio2 heterostructures for chemiresistive ozone sensors. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2019, 2, 4756–4764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Kim, J.-H.; Lee, J.-H.; Park, Y.; Kim, J.-Y.; Mirzaei, A.; Kim, H.W.; Kim, S.S. Toluene- and benzene-selective gas sensors based on pt- and pd-functionalized zno nanowires in self-heating mode. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2019, 294, 78–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Yang, X.; Wang, W.; Wang, C.; Xie, H.; Fu, H.; An, X.; Jiang, X.; Yu, A. Synthesis of au decorated v2o5 microflowers with enhanced sensing properties towards amines. Powder Technol. 2018, 339, 408–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Sanger, A.; Kumar, A.; Kumar, A.; Jaiswal, J.; Chandra, R. A fast response/recovery of hydrophobic pd/v2o5 thin films for hydrogen gas sensing. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2016, 236, 16–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Suematsu, K.; Kodama, K.; Ma, N.; Yuasa, M.; Kida, T.; Shimanoe, K. Role of vanadium oxide and palladium multiple loading on the sensitivity and recovery kinetics of tin dioxide based gas sensors. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 5169–5176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Mirzaei, A.; Kim, J.-H.; Kim, H.W.; Kim, S.S. Resistive-based gas sensors for detection of benzene, toluene and xylene (btx) gases: A review. J. Mater. Chem. C 2018, 6, 4342–4370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Feng, C.; Li, X.; Wang, C.; Sun, Y.; Zheng, J.; Lu, G. Facile synthesis benzene sensor based on v2o5-doped sno2 nanofibers. RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 47549–47555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Mirzaei, A.; Janghorban, K.; Hashemi, B.; Neri, G. Metal-core@metal oxide-shell nanomaterials for gas-sensing applications: A review. J. Nanopart. Res. 2015, 17, 371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Mirzaei, A.; Kim, J.-H.; Kim, H.W.; Kim, S.S. How shell thickness can affect the gas sensing properties of nanostructured materials: Survey of literature. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2018, 258, 270–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Kim, J.-H.; Mirzaei, A.; Kim, H.W.; Kim, S.S. Low power-consumption co gas sensors based on au-functionalized sno2-zno core-shell nanowires. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2018, 267, 597–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Shah, A.H.; Liu, Y.; Nguyen, V.T.; Zakharova, G.S.; Mehmood, I.; Chen, W. Enhanced ultra-stable n-propylamine sensing behavior of v2o5/in2o3 core–shell nanorods. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 54412–54419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Mane, A.A.; Nikam, S.A.; Moholkar, A.V. No2 gas sensing properties of sprayed composite porous moo3-v2o5 thin films. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2018, 216, 294–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Mane, A.A.; Maldar, P.S.; Desai, S.P.; Moholkar, A.V. Gas sensing properties of (moo3)0.4(v2o5)0.6 microsheets: Effect of pd sensitization. Vacuum 2017, 144, 135–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Diniz, M.O.; Golin, A.F.; Santos, M.C.; Bianchi, R.F.; Guerra, E.M. Improving performance of polymer-based ammonia gas sensor using poma/v2o5 hybrid films. Org. Electron. 2019, 67, 215–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Wang, J.; Wang, J.; Kong, Z.; Lv, K.; Teng, C.; Zhu, Y. Conducting-polymer-based materials for electrochemical energy conversion and storage. Adv. Mater. 2017, 29, 1703044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Zhang, J.; Ouyang, J.; Ye, Y.; Li, Z.; Lin, Q.; Chen, T.; Zhang, Z.; Xiang, S.J. Mixed-valence cobalt (ii/iii) metal–organic framework for ammonia sensing with naked-eye color switching. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 27465–27471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Naderi, H.; Hajati, S.; Ghaedi, M.; Dashtian, K.; Sabzehmeidani, M.M. Sensitive, selective and rapid ammonia-sensing by gold nanoparticle-sensitized v2o5/cuwo4 heterojunctions for exhaled breath analysis. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2020, 501, 144270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Zhang, F.; Wang, X.; Dong, J.; Qin, N.; Xu, J. Selective btex sensor based on a sno2/v2o5 composite. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2013, 186, 126–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Modafferi, V.; Trocino, S.; Donato, A.; Panzera, G.; Neri, G. Electrospun v2o5 composite fibers: Synthesis, characterization and ammonia sensing properties. Thin Solid Film 2013, 548, 689–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Xiao, B.; Huang, H.; Yu, X.; Song, J.; Qu, J. Facile synthesis of layered v2o5/znv2o6 heterostructures with enhanced sensing performance. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018, 447, 569–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Wang, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Meng, C.; Gao, Z.; Cao, X.; Li, X.; Xu, L.; Zhu, W.; Peng, X.; Zhang, B.; et al. A high-response ethanol gas sensor based on one-dimensional tio2/v2o branched nanoheterostructures. Nanotechnology 2016, 27, 425503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Nagaraju, P.; Vijayakumar, Y.; Reddy, M.V.R.; Deshpande, U.P. Effect of vanadium pentoxide concentration in zno/v2o5 nanostructured composite thin films for toluene detection. RSC Adv. 2019, 9, 16515–16524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. (a) Front side of substrate equipped with electrodes, (b) back side of substrate equipped with a heater, (c) sensor holder [35].
Figure 1. (a) Front side of substrate equipped with electrodes, (b) back side of substrate equipped with a heater, (c) sensor holder [35].
Chemosensors 08 00105 g001
Figure 2. (a,b) low magnification; (c,d) high magnification FE-SEM images of the flower-like V2O5 hierarchical nano structures [47].
Figure 2. (a,b) low magnification; (c,d) high magnification FE-SEM images of the flower-like V2O5 hierarchical nano structures [47].
Chemosensors 08 00105 g002
Figure 3. (a) Resistance versus temperature for V2O5 prepared under different sputtering powers (b) response of different morphologies of V2O5 as a function of temperature (c) response of different V2O5 nanostructures versus CH4 concentrations at 100 °C. (d) Comparison between the response to 500 ppm CH4 of different morphologies of V2O5 at 100 °C [52].
Figure 3. (a) Resistance versus temperature for V2O5 prepared under different sputtering powers (b) response of different morphologies of V2O5 as a function of temperature (c) response of different V2O5 nanostructures versus CH4 concentrations at 100 °C. (d) Comparison between the response to 500 ppm CH4 of different morphologies of V2O5 at 100 °C [52].
Chemosensors 08 00105 g003
Figure 4. Schematic of preparation of flower-like V2O5 via hydrothermal method [54].
Figure 4. Schematic of preparation of flower-like V2O5 via hydrothermal method [54].
Chemosensors 08 00105 g004
Figure 5. Sensing mechanism of hydrated V2O5 gas sensor to He gas [55].
Figure 5. Sensing mechanism of hydrated V2O5 gas sensor to He gas [55].
Chemosensors 08 00105 g005
Figure 6. Deposition of V2O5 thin films at different substrate temperatures [2].
Figure 6. Deposition of V2O5 thin films at different substrate temperatures [2].
Chemosensors 08 00105 g006
Figure 7. Response curve of sensors to 1000 ppm ethanol at 330 °C: (a) randomly oriented V2O5 NWs and (b) orderly assembled V2O5 NW microyarns [58].
Figure 7. Response curve of sensors to 1000 ppm ethanol at 330 °C: (a) randomly oriented V2O5 NWs and (b) orderly assembled V2O5 NW microyarns [58].
Chemosensors 08 00105 g007
Figure 8. (a,b) Energy band diagrams of SnO2-V2O5 before and after contact in air. (c) NO2 adsorption on SnO2 (101) V2O5 (001) surfaces. (d) Effect of number of ALD cycles and amount of V2O5 on the surface of SnO2 [67].
Figure 8. (a,b) Energy band diagrams of SnO2-V2O5 before and after contact in air. (c) NO2 adsorption on SnO2 (101) V2O5 (001) surfaces. (d) Effect of number of ALD cycles and amount of V2O5 on the surface of SnO2 [67].
Chemosensors 08 00105 g008
Table 1. Gas sensing properties of pristine V2O5 gas sensors.
Table 1. Gas sensing properties of pristine V2O5 gas sensors.
V2O5 MorphologySynthesis MethodTarget GasConc. (ppm)Response (Ra/Rg) or (Rg/Ra)T
(°C)
Response time/Recovery Time(s)Ref.
Hollow spheres
Solid spheres
SolvothermalC3H9N500
500
9.7
3.08
37020/83
45/150
[37]
Hollow spheresChemical synthesisH22002.8RT50/10[38]
NanoneedlesPVDC3H6O1402.35RT67/-[39]
Hierarchical nanostructuresHydrothermalC3H9N10–2001.13-3.572405/28[42]
Flower-likeHydrothermal52.2520013/13[43]
NanorodsCVDNH3100235 *400-/-[44]
NanorodsSolvothermalC2H5OH
NH3
5001.04
1.02
RT-/-[45]
SphericalPrecipitationC2H5OH
NH3
1.04
1.06
-/-[46]
Flower-likeHydrothermal1-butylamine1002.61409/49[47]
NanofibersElectrospinning9.5500 *RT-/-[48]
Flower-like Sheet-likeHydrothermal1003.6
2.8
30025/14
17/14
[49]
NanofibersSol–gelNH32.111 *20050/350[50]
Flower-likeDC sputteringCH4500100206/247[52]
HydrothermalC8H10330044/74[54]
Nano starsHydrothermalHe30053 *RT9/10[55]
NanorodsChemical spray pyrolysisNO210024.2 *20013/140[56]
NanofibersChemical spray pyrolysisC8H1027RT80/50[57]
NanowiresMelt quenchingC2H5OH10009.09330-/-[58]
Thin filmPlasma focus methodH250 *275-/-[59]
Chemical spray pyrolysis NO210041 *20020/150[60]
* Response = Δ R R a × 100 ; RT: Room temperature; PVD: Physical vapor deposition; CVD: Chemical vapor deposition.
Table 2. Gas sensing properties of decorated or doped V2O5-based gas sensors.
Table 2. Gas sensing properties of decorated or doped V2O5-based gas sensors.
SensorSynthesis MethodTarget GasConc. (ppm)Response (Ra/Rg) or (Rg/Ra)Working Temp. (°C)Response Time/Recovery Time(s)Ref.
Pd decorated porous Si/V2O5 nanopillarsDC sputteringNO224.5RT-/-[62]
Ru-decorated layer structure V2O5 HydrothermalNH3130 4 *RT~2/~12[65]
V2O5-decorated α-Fe2O3 nanorodsElectrospinningC4H11N300 93502/40[66]
V2O5 decorated SnO2 NWsVLS/ALDNO2200 ppb3.6250-/-[67]
Porous Si/V2O5
NR composite
Galvanostatic electrochemical etchingNO22 7.4RT-/-[69]
rGO/Mn3O4/V2O5 nanocompositeHydrothermalH250 175RT82/92[75]
Pd-decorated CuO NWsUV irradiationH2S100 1.962100-/-[76]
V2O5/CuO nano-string of pearlsElectrospinningC3H6O500 9440~40/~100[78]
CuO-decorated V2O5 NWsHydrothermal and wet-depositionH2S23 31.86220130/218[79]
SnO2 NP-decorated V2O5 NWs HydrothermalC2H5OH1000 1.3RT-/-[80]
Fe2O3 activated V2O5 nanotubesHydrolysisC2H5OH1000 2.2270-/-[81]
TiO2-decorated V2O5 NWsHydrothermalO31.25 2.6 *300~180/~180[82]
RGO-decorated V2O5 thin film Reactive sputtering and drop castingNO2100 50.7150-/-[76]
Au NP-decorated V2O5 Two-step in-situ reduction of Au and thermal oxidization as V2O5Amines1007.524090/35[84]
Pd-decorated V2O5 thin filmDC magnetron reactive sputteringH21005.7100~6/14.8[85]
V2O5-
doped SnO2 NFs
ElectrospinningC6H625 6.323253/47[88]
* Response = Δ R R a × 100 ; RT: Room temperature; VLS: Vapor-liquid-solid; NR; Nanorod; NP; Nanoparticle; NF; Nanofiber.
Table 3. Gas sensing properties of V2O5-based composite gas sensors.
Table 3. Gas sensing properties of V2O5-based composite gas sensors.
Sensing MaterialSynthesis MethodTarget GasConc. (Ppm)Response (Ra/Rg) Or (Rg/Ra)T (°C)Response Time/Recovery Time(S)Ref.
V2O5/In2O3 core–shellsHydrothermaln-propylamine200419048/121[92]
MoO3-V2O5 thin filmsChemical spray pyrolysisNO212080 *200118/1182[93]
(MoO3)0.4(V2O5)0.6 sheet compositeChemical spray pyrolysis10011539/453[94]
Au/V2O5/CuWO4 compositeHydrothermalNH352.715035/33[98]
SnO2/V2O5 compositeSol-gelC6H620010.5275-/-[99]
V2O5/polyvinyl acetate NF compositeElectrospinningNH30.86 *260-/-[100]
V2O5/ZnV2O6 nanobelt compositeChemical routeC2H5OH200016.5240-/-[101]
TiO2/V2O5 NF compositeElectrospinning10024.63506/7[102]
ZnO/V2O5 thin filmsSpray pyrolysisC7H84002.32723/28[103]
* Response = Δ R R a × 100 .
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Amiri, V.; Roshan, H.; Mirzaei, A.; Sheikhi, M.H. A Review of Nanostructured Resistive-Based Vanadium Oxide Gas Sensors. Chemosensors 2020, 8, 105. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemosensors8040105

AMA Style

Amiri V, Roshan H, Mirzaei A, Sheikhi MH. A Review of Nanostructured Resistive-Based Vanadium Oxide Gas Sensors. Chemosensors. 2020; 8(4):105. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemosensors8040105

Chicago/Turabian Style

Amiri, Vahid, Hossein Roshan, Ali Mirzaei, and Mohammad Hossein Sheikhi. 2020. "A Review of Nanostructured Resistive-Based Vanadium Oxide Gas Sensors" Chemosensors 8, no. 4: 105. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemosensors8040105

APA Style

Amiri, V., Roshan, H., Mirzaei, A., & Sheikhi, M. H. (2020). A Review of Nanostructured Resistive-Based Vanadium Oxide Gas Sensors. Chemosensors, 8(4), 105. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemosensors8040105

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop