Next Article in Journal
Bridging the Knowledge–Practice Gap in Cervical Spine Injury First Aid: A Cross-Sectional Study in Southern Saudi Arabia
Next Article in Special Issue
Stress, Resilience, and Sense of Coherence in Healthcare Professionals
Previous Article in Journal
Artificial Intelligence in Exams by Image: Ethical Pros and Cons
Previous Article in Special Issue
Burnout Syndrome Among Critical Care Nurses After COVID-19 Pandemic: An International Single-Centre Study in Croatia and Poland
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

After-Hours Service Demands and Dentist Well-Being: Unpacking the Roles of Compassion Satisfaction and Organizational Support

Department of Business Administration, Cyprus Health and Social Sciences University, 99700 Güzelyurt, Turkey
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Healthcare 2026, 14(9), 1239; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare14091239
Submission received: 25 February 2026 / Revised: 22 April 2026 / Accepted: 27 April 2026 / Published: 4 May 2026
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Well-Being of Healthcare Professionals: New Insights After COVID-19)

Abstract

Background/Objective: This study examines how after-hours service demands (AHSD) are associated with dentists’ overall work experience (OWE) through the mediating role of compassion satisfaction (CS) and the moderating role of perceived organizational support (POS). Grounded in the Job Demands–Resources (JD-R) and Conservation of Resources (COR) theories, the study investigates how job demands, emotional resources, and organizational support jointly relate to dentists’ psychological well-being. Methods: Data were collected from 450 dentists across seven major Libyan cities—Tripoli, Benghazi, Misrata, Sabha, Al Bayda, Zawiya, and Derna—using a structured online questionnaire administered between May and August 2025. Results: Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) results indicated that AHSD were positively associated with both CS and OWE, suggesting that demanding work conditions may, under certain conditions, coincide with more positive professional experiences when perceived as meaningful and supported. CS partially mediated the AHSD–OWE relationship, highlighting its role as a key emotional resource linked to more favorable work experiences. In addition, POS moderated the relationships between AHSD and CS, and between AHSD and OWE, although the effects were relatively modest, indicating that organizational support may provide incremental support in how dentists experience demanding work conditions rather than fundamentally altering these relationships. The moderated mediation analysis further suggested that the indirect association between AHSD and OWE via CS was stronger at higher levels of POS. Conclusions: Overall, the findings refine JD-R and COR perspectives by indicating that job demands, emotional resources, and organizational support are jointly associated with dentists’ work-related well-being in a high-demand healthcare context.

1. Introduction

Dental professionals face uniquely demanding work environments characterized by intensive technical precision, emotional labor, and sustained patient interaction. Beyond clinical duties, many dentists are also responsible for managing their own practices, balancing patient care with administrative and business responsibilities [1]. These dual pressures—clinical and managerial—can intensify psychological strain and reduce opportunities for recovery. In the Libyan healthcare context, these challenges are further intensified by structural constraints, including workforce shortages, uneven distribution of healthcare services, and rising patient demand, which collectively place substantial pressure on dental professionals [2,3]. As a result, dentists are frequently required to extend their working hours beyond standard schedules, particularly to address emergency cases and urgent patient needs, leading to prolonged work exposure and limited recovery time [4,5]. Such conditions create a high-demand work environment in which long working hours and after-hours responsibilities are not exceptional but routine, making it essential to examine how these demands shape dentists’ overall work experience and well-being. At the same time, these conditions reflect a resource-constrained and institutionally fragile setting; therefore, the patterns observed in this study should be interpreted in relation to the Libyan context rather than assumed to apply uniformly to more stable or high-resource healthcare systems.
After-hours service demands (AHSD) represent one of the most salient yet understudied stressors in dental practice. Dentists are often expected to remain available for emergencies, callbacks, or unscheduled treatments beyond regular working hours. These demands can intrude upon personal time, hinder recovery, and disrupt family and social life [6,7]. Research in related fields consistently links extended work availability to impaired recovery and increased stress [8,9]. However, existing well-being research has predominantly focused on nurses and physicians, while dentists remain comparatively underexplored despite their distinct workload structures and professional responsibilities [10,11]. This highlights a clear empirical gap in understanding how after-hours service demands influence dentists’ work-related outcomes.
Importantly, job demands are not exclusively detrimental. Providing urgent care may enhance professional meaning and fulfillment, reflecting the dual nature of job demands [12]. In this context, compassion satisfaction (CS)—defined as the sense of fulfillment derived from helping others—emerges as a critical psychological resource associated with engagement and resilience [13,14,15]. Similarly, perceived organizational support (POS) plays a key role in shaping how employees interpret demanding work conditions, with supportive environments enabling individuals to perceive demands as meaningful rather than burdensome [16,17,18].
This study draws on the Job Demands–Resources (JD-R) theory [19] and the Conservation of Resources (COR) theory [20] to conceptualize these dynamics. Within this framework, after-hours service demands function as job demands, compassion satisfaction as a personal resource, and perceived organizational support as an organizational resource influencing employees’ responses to demanding conditions [21,22]. Overall work experience (OWE) is conceptualized as a holistic indicator of occupational well-being, capturing both affective and cognitive evaluations of work, including satisfaction, engagement, and emotional connection [23,24,25].
Accordingly, this study aims to empirically examine these interrelated mechanisms within the Libyan healthcare context. By focusing on dentists—a professional group that remains underrepresented in occupational well-being research despite facing distinct and demanding work conditions—this study addresses a critical empirical and contextual gap. More specifically, the study makes three mechanism-level contributions. First, it conceptualizes after-hours service demands in dentistry as a dual-nature demand that may be associated not only with strain but also with professional meaning, thereby moving beyond JD-R applications that treat demanding work primarily as an impairment trigger. Second, it positions compassion satisfaction not merely as a positive correlate of well-being but as a psychological mechanism through which demanding work can be translated into a more favorable overall work experience. Third, it specifies perceived organizational support as a conditional organizational resource that shapes whether after-hours demands are interpreted as burdensome intrusions or meaningful professional contributions. These contributions are particularly relevant in dentistry because dentists often combine clinical responsibility, emergency responsiveness, professional autonomy, and administrative accountability to a greater extent than many other healthcare workers, making the demand–resource dynamic structurally distinct rather than simply comparable to nursing or physician settings. These insights also generate practical implications for healthcare administrators and policymakers seeking to enhance workforce resilience, engagement, and retention. To achieve these aims, the following research questions guide the investigation:
  • RQ1: How do AHSD directly influence dentists’ OWE?
  • RQ2: What role does CS play in mediating the relationship between AHSD and OWE?
  • RQ3: To what extent does POS moderate the relationships between AHSD and CS, and between AHSD and OWE?
  • RQ4: Does POS moderate the indirect effect of AHSD on OWE through CS?
Together, these research questions aim to uncover the interconnected pathways through which job demands, emotional resources, and organizational support interact to shape dentists’ professional fulfillment and well-being, within a context marked by structural pressure and limited organizational slack, offering both theoretical advancement within the JD-R and COR frameworks and practical guidance for promoting sustainable work engagement in oral healthcare settings.

2. Literature Review and Theoretical Background

2.1. Underpinning Theories: JD-R and COR

The Job Demands–Resources (JD-R) theory provides a structured framework for examining how job characteristics influence employee well-being and performance [19]. It distinguishes between job demands, which require sustained effort, and job resources, which support goal attainment and facilitate positive work outcomes [26,27,28]. Rather than providing a general explanation, this study applies JD-R specifically to classify the core constructs under investigation, where after-hours service demands (AHSD) represent job demands, compassion satisfaction (CS) reflects a personal resource, perceived organizational support (POS) represents an organizational resource, and overall work experience (OWE) captures the well-being outcome.
Within this framework, AHSD constitute a salient job demand in dental settings due to extended availability for emergency care and patient needs beyond regular working hours [29,30]. Consistent with the JD-R perspective, such demands are not assumed to be uniformly detrimental; instead, their effects depend on the availability of supporting resources [31]. POS functions as an organizational resource that facilitates more positive interpretations of demanding work conditions, while CS operates as a personal resource that enables individuals to derive meaning and emotional fulfillment from their professional activities [15,32,33,34]. Accordingly, JD-R is used in this study to explain how demands and resources are structurally related to work-related outcomes.
To complement this structural perspective, the Conservation of Resources (COR) theory is employed to explain the underlying mechanism through which resources are depleted and replenished over time [35]. The COR theory posits that individuals strive to retain and build valued resources, and that stress arises when these resources are threatened or lost [36]. In the context of this study, AHSD may contribute to resource depletion by reducing recovery opportunities, whereas POS (external resource) and CS (internal resource) support resource preservation and gain processes [16,37]. Thus, the COR theory is not used to redefine demands and resources, but to clarify how their dynamic interaction influences employees’ psychological states.
By combining JD-R and COR, this study distinguishes clearly between structure and mechanism; JD-R explains how AHSD, CS, POS, and OWE are conceptually related, while COR explains how resource loss and gain processes shape these relationships under demanding work conditions.

2.2. Employee Well-Being in the Healthcare Sector

Employee well-being in healthcare is a critical determinant of both workforce sustainability and service quality [38]. Healthcare professionals frequently operate under demanding conditions characterized by high responsibility and emotional intensity, increasing susceptibility to stress and fatigue [37]. Despite extensive research in this domain, prior studies have predominantly focused on physicians and nurses, with comparatively limited attention given to dentists, despite their distinct work conditions [7].
Dentistry presents a unique occupational context in which clinical responsibilities are often combined with administrative pressures and extended work demands [6]. These characteristics make dentists particularly sensitive to fluctuations in job demands and available resources, highlighting the need to examine well-being through an integrated theoretical lens.
In this study, OWE is conceptualized as a holistic indicator of well-being that captures individuals’ overall evaluative and emotional experiences at work [24]. Unlike job satisfaction or work engagement, OWE reflects a broader construct that integrates cognitive evaluation and affective experience, making it suitable for assessing well-being in complex professional environments [39,40].
Within the JD-R and COR frameworks, well-being is understood as an outcome shaped by the interaction between job demands and available resources. In this context, AHSD represent a key demand, while CS and POS function as personal and organizational resources that influence how these demands are experienced. This perspective enables a more focused examination of how work conditions translate into overall work experience among dentists.

2.3. After-Hours Demands and Overall Work Experience

AHSD represent a salient job demand in dentistry, as practitioners are frequently required to provide care beyond regular working hours, including emergency treatments and patient follow-ups [4,18,29]. Such demands require sustained cognitive and emotional effort and may limit opportunities for recovery, thereby influencing employees’ overall work experience.
Existing research suggests that extended work demands are associated with fatigue, impaired recovery, and reduced work–life balance [5,41]. From a job demands perspective, these conditions may negatively affect work-related evaluations by increasing strain and emotional exhaustion. However, within the JD-R framework, job demands are not inherently detrimental and may also function as challenge demands when associated with meaningful outcomes [19].
In dentistry, after-hours interventions often involve alleviating patient pain or restoring function, enabling practitioners to directly observe the impact of their work. This immediacy may contribute to perceptions of professional meaning and may be associated with more positive evaluations of work experience under certain conditions, despite the demanding nature of such tasks [42].
From a resource perspective, the net effect of AHSD depends on the balance between resource depletion and potential resource gain [20,43]. Accordingly, AHSD can be conceptualized as a dual-function demand that may either undermine or be positively associated with work experience depending on individual appraisal and the availability of supporting resources [44].
Importantly, these theoretical relationships should be interpreted within the specific context of the Libyan dental sector and do not imply universal or deterministic effects across all professional or institutional settings. Based on the JD-R and COR frameworks, AHSD may function as a challenge demand that is positively associated with overall work experience. Therefore, the following hypothesis is proposed:
H1. 
After-hours service demands are significantly associated with dentists’ overall work experience.

2.4. After-Hours Demands and Compassion Satisfaction

AHSD require dentists to respond to patient needs beyond standard working hours, often under time pressure and emotional intensity [45]. Such demands are typically associated with increased strain and reduced recovery [5,41].
However, emerging evidence suggests that job demands may also generate positive psychological outcomes when linked to meaningful work experiences. Compassion satisfaction (CS), defined as the fulfillment derived from helping others, represents a key psychological resource in healthcare settings [15].
In dentistry, the immediate impact of treatment outcomes allows practitioners to directly observe the benefits of their work. Providing care during after-hours periods may strengthen perceptions of purpose and may be associated with increased professional fulfillment in certain contexts, rather than uniformly producing positive outcomes [42,46].
From a JD-R perspective, CS functions as an internal resource that enables individuals to reinterpret demanding situations more positively, transforming after-hours work into a meaningful experience [19]. Thus, AHSD may contribute to higher CS when these demands are perceived as meaningful and are supported by sufficient psychological and organizational resources [47].
These relationships are context-dependent and should be interpreted cautiously, particularly within the Libyan healthcare environment characterized by specific structural and resource constraints. Based on this reasoning, AHSD can stimulate compassion satisfaction when experienced as meaningful professional contributions. Therefore, the following hypothesis is proposed:
H2. 
After-hours service demands are positively associated with compassion satisfaction among dentists.

2.5. Compassion Satisfaction and Overall Work Experience

Compassion satisfaction (CS) represents a positive psychological state reflecting fulfillment, meaning, and accomplishment derived from helping others [15]. As a personal resource, CS plays a central role in shaping how individuals evaluate their work experiences.
Empirical research consistently shows that CS is associated with higher engagement, job satisfaction, and reduced burnout [13,48]. These findings indicate that CS contributes directly to more favorable work-related evaluations and overall well-being.
In dentistry, the ability to alleviate patient pain and deliver visible outcomes reinforces a sense of professional purpose. This strengthens emotional attachment to work and enhances overall work experience.
From a resource-based perspective, CS replenishes emotional energy and supports resilience, enabling individuals to maintain positive work evaluations under demanding conditions [49,50]. As a result, dentists with higher CS are more likely to experience their work positively despite job demands.
Thus, AHSD may contribute to higher CS when these demands are perceived as meaningful and are supported by sufficient psychological and organizational resources. Accordingly, CS functions as a key determinant of overall work experience. Therefore, the following hypothesis is proposed:
H3. 
Compassion satisfaction is positively associated with dentists’ overall work experience.

2.6. Mediating Role of Compassion Satisfaction

While after-hours service demands (AHSD) influence work-related outcomes, their effects are not necessarily direct. Compassion satisfaction (CS) is proposed as the mechanism through which AHSD shapes overall work experience (OWE).
AHSD introduce additional effort and time demands, which may increase strain. However, when these demands are associated with meaningful patient care, they may also generate emotional fulfillment. CS captures this positive psychological response [51].
Empirical evidence indicates that CS enhances engagement and reduces burnout [13,48]. Thus, individuals who experience higher CS are more likely to interpret demanding work as meaningful rather than burdensome.
From a resource perspective, CS represents an internal resource that converts demanding work conditions into positive work-related evaluations. In the absence of CS, AHSD are more likely to be perceived negatively, leading to reduced work experience [52,53,54].
This mediating mechanism reflects a conditional process rather than a universally consistent effect. Accordingly, CS explains how AHSD influence OWE by transforming demanding experiences into meaningful outcomes. Therefore, the following hypothesis is proposed:
H4. 
Compassion satisfaction mediates the relationship between after-hours service demands and dentists’ overall work experience.

2.7. Moderating Role of Organizational Support

Perceived organizational support (POS) reflects the extent to which employees believe their organization values their contributions and cares about their well-being [34]. As an organizational resource, POS influences how job demands are interpreted and managed.
In dentistry, where professionals often operate in relatively independent settings, POS becomes a critical contextual factor shaping responses to after-hours demands [55].
POS is expected to moderate the relationship between AHSD and CS. When organizational support is high, after-hours demands are more likely to be perceived as valued contributions, enhancing compassion satisfaction. In contrast, low support may lead to negative interpretations of the same demands [56,57,58].
Similarly, POS is expected to moderate the relationship between AHSD and OWE. High support provides emotional and instrumental resources that help individuals sustain positive work evaluations under demanding conditions [18,59,60].
Furthermore, POS conditions the strength of the indirect relationship between AHSD and OWE through CS, as supportive environments reinforce the positive interpretation of demanding work experiences.
The moderating effects of organizational support should therefore be interpreted as context-sensitive rather than universally generalizable. Based on this reasoning, the following hypotheses are proposed:
H5. 
Perceived organizational support positively moderates the relationship between after-hours service demands and compassion satisfaction, such that the relationship is stronger when organizational support is high.
H6. 
Perceived organizational support positively moderates the relationship between after-hours service demands and dentists’ overall work experience, such that the relationship is stronger when organizational support is high.
H7. 
The indirect effect of after-hours service demands on overall work experience through compassion satisfaction is stronger at higher levels of perceived organizational support.

3. Methodology

3.1. Research Context

Libya presents a complex and challenging environment for examining the well-being of dental professionals due to its prolonged political instability, economic decline, and weakened healthcare infrastructure since 2011. Once a model for healthcare provision in the region, the Libyan health system has deteriorated under the strain of continuous conflict and limited governance, resulting in unequal service delivery, workforce shortages, and declining care quality [2,61]. Within this fragile system, the dental sector faces additional pressures, including an uncontrolled surge in the number of dental schools and graduates, often at the expense of educational standards and professional preparedness [62]. The oversupply of dentists, coupled with limited employment opportunities and inadequate institutional support, has intensified competition and increased reliance on after-hours practice as a means of sustaining income. Moreover, oral health indicators reflect a growing public health burden, with high and rising prevalence of untreated dental caries attributed to limited preventive programs, reduced access to care, and low awareness of oral hygiene [63]. These systemic challenges have created a demanding work environment where dentists are frequently required to extend their working hours, leading to heightened physical and emotional strain. Against this backdrop, Libya offers a particularly relevant context for exploring how after-hours service demands influence dentists’ overall work experience and psychological well-being within a strained healthcare system.

3.2. Sample and Data Collection

This study employed a quantitative, cross-sectional research design to examine how after-hours service demands influence dentists’ work experience and psychological well-being in Libya. The sampling frame was drawn from dental-care institutions across the country, encompassing both public and private healthcare facilities that operate under different administrative authorities [2]. According to the Libyan Ministry of Health, the national health system includes 96 hospitals, 25 specialized departments, 1355 main medical centers, 37 clinics, and 17 quarantine departments [64]. Because an exact national registry of practicing dentists was not publicly available, the broader official healthcare workforce figure reported by the World Health Organization (WHO), which lists 21,568 registered doctors in Libya, was used only as an approximate population reference for sample size estimation rather than as the actual target population of the study. Based on Taro Yamane’s [65] formula, with a 95% confidence level and a 5% margin of error, a minimum sample size of 393 was deemed adequate. This threshold was exceeded, as the final sample comprised 450 valid responses, thereby increasing statistical adequacy. Furthermore, the sample size satisfies the minimum requirements for Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) analysis, which recommends a sample size exceeding ten times the maximum number of structural paths directed at any construct [66].
However, due to the absence of a comprehensive national registry of practicing dentists and the ongoing socio-political instability in Libya, probability sampling techniques were not feasible. Therefore, a convenience (nonprobability) sampling approach was adopted. Participants were recruited based on the following inclusion criteria: (1) being a licensed practicing dentist in Libya, and (2) currently employed in either public or private dental-care institutions. Dentists were recruited from public hospitals, medical polyclinics, specialized dental centers, and private dental practices across major Libyan cities—Tripoli, Benghazi, Misrata, Sabha, Al Bayda, Zawiya, and Derna—to ensure broad geographic and institutional coverage [67]. While this approach enabled access to a diverse sample, it may also introduce sampling bias due to differential participation across regions and recruitment channels. In particular, dentists affiliated with active professional networks or urban centers may be overrepresented, whereas those in less-connected or rural areas may be underrepresented. The use of convenience sampling is justified in contexts where population frames are incomplete and access to respondents is constrained; however, it may introduce selection bias and limit the generalizability of the findings [68].
Data were collected between May and August 2025 using a self-administered, online-based questionnaire distributed through Google Forms. The survey link was disseminated via multiple recruitment channels, including professional dental associations, institutional mailing lists, and targeted social-media groups of practicing dentists, thereby maximizing reach and participation. The survey introduction clearly outlined the study’s purpose and assured respondents of anonymity, confidentiality, and voluntary participation. Prior to full deployment, the questionnaire was pilot-tested with 25 dentists from different regions to ensure clarity, relevance, and cultural appropriateness, and minor revisions were implemented accordingly [69].
A total of 1117 survey invitations were distributed, yielding 450 completed and usable responses, corresponding to a response rate of 40.3%, which is considered acceptable in healthcare survey research [70]. Two follow-up reminders were sent at one-week intervals to improve participation rates. All returned questionnaires were systematically screened for completeness and consistency. Responses with missing data or incomplete answers were excluded from the analysis. As a result, the final dataset contained no missing values, ensuring data integrity for subsequent statistical analysis.
The final sample included dentists from both public and private sectors, with varied professional experience and demographic characteristics, reflecting the heterogeneous nature of Libya’s dental workforce. Although efforts were made to ensure geographic diversity, such diversity does not guarantee full representativeness of the national dental workforce. Therefore, the findings should be interpreted with caution in terms of external validity, as the sample may not fully capture the distribution and characteristics of all practicing dentists across Libya. The data were analyzed using PLS-SEM to test the hypothesized direct, mediating, and moderating relationships.
Table 1 summarizes the demographic profile of the respondents. The sample demonstrates diversity in gender, age, education, experience, and geographic distribution. Most respondents were aged between 30 and 39 years (41.6%), held a Bachelor’s degree (61.8%), and worked full-time (85%). Approximately 39% had 5–10 years of experience, and respondents were distributed across major Libyan cities, ensuring broad but not fully representative coverage of the national dental workforce.

3.3. Measures

The survey instrument was developed by adapting well-established and previously validated measurement scales to ensure construct validity and theoretical alignment with the study objectives. All measurement instruments have been widely validated in prior healthcare and organizational research contexts, supporting their applicability and robustness. Since the research was conducted in an Arabic-speaking environment, the original English items were translated and back-translated following Brislin’s [71] procedure to ensure linguistic accuracy and conceptual equivalence. In addition to translation, minor contextual adaptations were made to align the wording with dental practice settings in Libya while preserving the original meaning of the constructs.
To ensure content and face validity, two pretests were conducted with subject-matter experts in oral health and organizational behavior, who evaluated the clarity, relevance, and cultural appropriateness of the items. A pilot study involving 25 dentists from different regions of Libya was subsequently conducted to assess item comprehension and contextual suitability. These respondents were excluded from the final sample. Minor refinements were made based on their feedback, thereby enhancing clarity and reliability. The final questionnaire employed a five-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (“strongly disagree”) to 5 (“strongly agree”), ensuring consistency and ease of response.
Four constructs were measured using established multi-item scales (see Appendix A, Table A1). After-hours service demands (AHSD) were assessed using a five-item scale adapted from Bakker and Demerouti [72] and Xanthopoulou et al. [73], capturing the extent to which dentists are required to work beyond regular hours (e.g., “I am frequently required to provide dental care beyond regular working hours”). Compassion satisfaction (CS) was measured using the ten-item Professional Quality of Life Scale (ProQOL V) developed by Stamm [74], reflecting the fulfillment derived from helping others (e.g., “I get satisfaction from being able to help people”). Perceived organizational support (POS) was evaluated using the eight-item short version of the Survey of Perceived Organizational Support by Eisenberger et al. [34], capturing employees’ perceptions of organizational care and recognition (e.g., “My organization really cares about my well-being”). Overall work experience (OWE) was measured using eight items adapted from Zheng et al. [75] and Schaufeli et al. [76], reflecting satisfaction, engagement, and emotional connection to work (e.g., “Overall, I am satisfied with my work experience”).
All constructs demonstrated satisfactory internal consistency reliability. Cronbach’s alpha values were 0.824 for AHSD, 0.879 for CS, 0.836 for POS, and 0.813 for OWE, exceeding the recommended threshold of 0.70. These results confirm the reliability and stability of the measurement scales within the Libyan dental context. Overall, the combination of validated scales, rigorous translation procedures, pilot testing, and reliability assessment ensures the robustness and appropriateness of the measurement model.

3.4. Common Method Variance

Because this study relied on self-reported survey data, the possibility of common method variance (CMV)—systematic error arising from the measurement method rather than the constructs being examined—was carefully addressed to support the validity of the findings [77]. Several procedural remedies were applied during the design and administration of the questionnaire: respondents were guaranteed anonymity and confidentiality, participation was voluntary, and items were adapted from well-validated scales and refined through pilot testing to minimize ambiguity and social desirability bias [78]. These procedures were intended to reduce evaluation apprehension and lower the likelihood of artificially inflated associations among variables. To statistically assess CMV, Harman’s single-factor test was conducted, revealing that the largest single factor accounted for 34.76% of the total variance, which is below the 50% threshold commonly considered problematic [77]. Recognizing the limitations of this approach, the full collinearity test recommended by Kock [79] was also applied; the variance inflation factor (VIF) values for all constructs ranged between 1.109 and 1.949, remaining well below the cut-off value of 3.3 [80]. Taken together, these results suggest that CMV is unlikely to constitute a severe threat to the validity of the findings.
Nevertheless, these procedural and statistical checks reduce rather than eliminate the possibility of residual common method bias. In a cross-sectional design where all variables were collected from the same respondents at a single point in time, single-source self-reports may inflate path estimates, and the pattern of fully significant hypothesized relationships may partly reflect shared method variance or positively aligned response tendencies rather than the true strength of the associations alone. Therefore, although the available evidence indicates that CMV was not a dominant problem in this study, the reported associations should be interpreted with this limitation in mind, and future research is encouraged to employ multi-source data collection, time-lagged designs, or objective indicators to strengthen causal and discriminant validity.

3.5. Analysis

Data analysis was conducted using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM), a variance-based technique suitable for examining complex models incorporating mediation and moderation effects. PLS-SEM was selected due to its robustness in handling non-normal data, model complexity, and predictive-oriented research objectives [66,81]. The analysis followed the two-step approach recommended by Hair et al. [80], involving (1) assessment of the measurement model (reliability and validity) and (2) evaluation of the structural model (hypothesis testing). The analysis was performed using SmartPLS 4.1.0.9, with bootstrapping (5000 resamples) applied to assess the significance of path coefficients and indirect effects [82]. SPSS version 25.0 (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY, USA) was used for descriptive statistics.
The conceptual model, comprising direct (H1–H3), mediating (H4), moderating (H5–H6), and conditional indirect relationships (H7), was tested using PLS-SEM. Specifically, AHSD was modeled as the independent variable, OWE as the dependent variable, CS as a mediator, and POS as a moderator. This specification enables the simultaneous estimation of direct, indirect, and interaction effects within a unified analytical framework. Figure 1 presents the conceptual model with all hypothesized relationships (H1–H7).

4. Results

4.1. Measurement Model Assessment

The measurement model was evaluated to assess internal consistency reliability, convergent validity, and discriminant validity in accordance with established PLS-SEM guidelines [66,80]. As shown in Table 2, all retained indicator loadings exceeded the recommended threshold of 0.70, with a few acceptable values above 0.60, confirming that the observed variables adequately represent their respective latent constructs [83]. Two items from the perceived organizational support scale (POS5 and POS7) were removed due to low outer loadings below the recommended threshold of 0.70, consistent with established indicator reliability criteria. Importantly, POS5 and POS7 were reverse-coded items, and their weak psychometric performance may reflect wording difficulty, reverse-coding sensitivity, or limited contextual fit within this sample. Their removal was therefore undertaken to preserve construct reliability and convergent validity rather than to artificially improve the model. The retained POS items continued to capture the core conceptual domain of perceived organizational support.
Internal consistency reliability was confirmed, with Cronbach’s alpha (CA) values ranging from 0.813 to 0.879 and composite reliability (CR) values ranging from 0.833 to 0.895, exceeding the recommended threshold of 0.70 [66,84]. Convergent validity was established as all constructs achieved average variance extracted (AVE) values greater than 0.50, indicating that each construct explains more than half of the variance of its indicators [85]. Descriptive statistics, including means and standard deviations, are reported in Table 2, and 95% confidence intervals were examined to ensure stability of the estimates.
To assess discriminant validity, both the Fornell–Larcker criterion and the Heterotrait–Monotrait (HTMT) ratio were employed. As presented in Table 3, the square root of each construct’s AVE exceeded its inter-construct correlations, satisfying the Fornell–Larcker criterion [85]. Additionally, all HTMT values were below the conservative threshold of 0.85, confirming that the constructs are empirically distinct [86].
Variance Inflation Factor (VIF) values were also examined and found to be below the recommended threshold of 3.3, indicating the absence of multicollinearity and providing additional evidence that common method bias is not a serious concern [79,80].
Collectively, these results confirm that the measurement model demonstrates satisfactory reliability, convergent validity, and discriminant validity, supporting its suitability for subsequent structural model analysis.

4.2. Structural Model Assessment: Direct and Indirect Effects

The structural model was assessed to evaluate the hypothesized relationships among the latent constructs and to determine the model’s explanatory power and predictive relevance [87]. Prior to hypothesis testing, collinearity diagnostics confirmed that all variance inflation factor (VIF) values were below 3.3, indicating no multicollinearity concerns [79]. In line with PLS-SEM methodological guidelines, model fit indices such as Chi-square and NFI were not considered, and the evaluation focused on variance explained (R2), predictive relevance (Q2), and effect sizes (f2).
As shown in Figure 2, the R2 values indicate that the model explains 67.4% of the variance in Compassion Satisfaction (R2 = 0.674) and 60.1% of the variance in Overall Work Experience (R2 = 0.601), suggesting moderate to substantial explanatory power [88,89]. In addition, the Q2 values for Compassion Satisfaction (Q2 = 0.670) and Overall Work Experience (Q2 = 0.554) are greater than zero, indicating strong predictive relevance of the model [80,90]. The reported effect sizes (f2) range between 0.166 and 0.197, indicating small to moderate effects of the predictor constructs on the endogenous variables.
As presented in Table 4, the path analysis revealed statistically significant direct and indirect relationships among the study constructs, assessed using a bootstrapping procedure with 5000 resamples to ensure robust estimation [66]. The results indicate that AHSD is positively associated with CS (β = 0.215, p < 0.001) and OWE (β = 0.253, p < 0.001), supporting H1 and H2, respectively. Furthermore, CS is positively associated with OWE (β = 0.344, p < 0.001), supporting H3.
The mediation analysis (H4) indicates that compassion satisfaction partially mediates the relationship between AHSD and OWE (β = 0.074, p = 0.001), as both the direct and indirect paths are statistically significant. The bootstrapped confidence intervals for the indirect effect do not include zero, confirming the significance of the mediating effect [91]. At the same time, these findings should be interpreted as associative rather than causal because the study relies on a cross-sectional design. Accordingly, causal inferences cannot be drawn from the reported paths, and the observed relationships may also reflect alternative directional patterns. For example, dentists with higher overall work experience may be more willing to engage in after-hours work or may evaluate such demands more positively, indicating that reverse causality cannot be ruled out.
Overall, the findings suggest that AHSD is associated with OWE both directly and indirectly through compassion satisfaction, reflecting a dual pathway in which work demands are linked to professional well-being outcomes depending on the availability of psychological resources. However, the temporal direction of these relationships should be interpreted with caution and confirmed through longitudinal research.

4.3. Moderation and Moderated Mediation Analysis

The final phase of the analysis examined the moderating role of POS on the relationships among the key study variables. As shown in Table 5, POS was positively associated with the strength of the relationship between AHSD and CS (β = 0.054, p < 0.010), supporting H5. Although statistically significant, the magnitude of this moderating effect is relatively small (f2 = 0.041), which falls within the small-effect range according to Cohen’s [89] guidelines. This indicates that POS does not exert a dominant influence but provides an incremental contribution in shaping how dentists interpret after-hours demands. The simple slope analysis (Figure 3) indicates that the association between AHSD and CS is stronger at higher levels of POS, suggesting that supportive organizational contexts may modestly facilitate more favorable interpretations of after-hours demands.
Similarly, POS was positively associated with the relationship between AHSD and OWE (β = 0.048, p < 0.010), supporting H6. As illustrated in Figure 4, this interaction indicates that higher levels of POS are linked to a stronger association between AHSD and OWE. However, the relatively small coefficient suggests that POS operates as a complementary rather than dominant boundary condition. From a practical perspective, this implies that organizational support alone is unlikely to substantially transform work experiences, and its contribution should be understood as incremental rather than decisive, even when combined with other psychological resources such as compassion satisfaction.
To further examine whether POS conditions the indirect relationship between AHSD and OWE through CS, a moderated mediation analysis was conducted using Hayes’ [92] PROCESS macro (Model 14) with 5000 bootstrap samples and 95% confidence intervals [93]. The results revealed a significant moderated mediation index (0.096, 95% CI [0.016, 0.168]), supporting H7. This indicates that the indirect association between AHSD and OWE through CS varies across levels of POS.
Importantly, while this conditional indirect effect is statistically significant, its magnitude suggests a modest amplification effect rather than a substantial shift in the overall relationship. In practical terms, this finding indicates that organizational support may incrementally strengthen the role of compassion satisfaction, but its effect is modest and should not be interpreted as substantially offsetting the challenges associated with after-hours service demands. As shown in Figure 5, higher levels of POS are associated with a stronger indirect relationship between AHSD and OWE through CS; however, the effect size indicates that organizational support enhances rather than fundamentally alters the underlying mechanism.
These moderation and moderated mediation results should also be interpreted within the limits of the study’s cross-sectional design. Although POS is associated with stronger direct and indirect relationships, the analysis does not establish temporal ordering or causal direction. It remains possible, for instance, that dentists who report more favorable work experiences are also more likely to perceive greater organizational support or to engage more willingly in after-hours duties. Therefore, the reported moderation patterns indicate conditional associations rather than causal interaction effects.
Collectively, these findings demonstrate that POS functions as a contextual resource that modestly and incrementally strengthens both the direct and indirect associations between after-hours service demands and work-related outcomes, rather than acting as a primary driver of these relationships.

5. Discussion and Implications

5.1. Discussion of Key Findings

The findings provide a context-sensitive account of how after-hours service demands (AHSD), compassion satisfaction (CS), and perceived organizational support (POS) are associated with dentists’ overall work experience (OWE) in Libya. Consistent with H1, AHSD was positively associated with OWE, but this association should be interpreted cautiously and should not be read as evidence that heavier workload improves well-being. In the Libyan dental context—where workforce instability, limited institutional resources, and economic pressures are prevalent—after-hours work may be interpreted by some dentists as a professionally meaningful obligation rather than only a burden [2,62]. However, alternative explanations are equally plausible, including self-selection effects, whereby more committed or resilient dentists may disproportionately take on such work, and reverse causality, whereby dentists with more favorable work experiences may be more willing to accept after-hours duties. Accordingly, this finding is better understood as a bounded, non-causal association rather than evidence that extended work is inherently beneficial.
Supporting H2 and H3, AHSD was positively associated with CS, and CS was positively associated with OWE, suggesting that emotionally meaningful patient care may help some dentists interpret demanding work more positively, particularly where treatment outcomes are immediate and visible [20,22]. The mediation result for H4 further indicates that this association operates partly through CS, consistent with the possibility that fulfillment derived from urgent patient care contributes to more favorable overall work evaluations [94,95]. Given the cross-sectional design, however, this indirect pattern should not be interpreted causally, as dentists with higher compassion satisfaction may also be more likely to report stronger work experience and greater willingness to engage in after-hours service.
Regarding H5–H7, POS significantly moderated the AHSD–CS and AHSD–OWE relationships and strengthened the indirect path through CS. These interaction effects were small in magnitude and should be interpreted as incremental rather than substantial; supportive organizational conditions may modestly shape how demands are experienced but should not be treated as powerful standalone intervention levers [16,37]. The study also relied on self-reported, single-source data, and the pattern of fully significant relationships raises the possibility of common method inflation; although statistical checks were conducted, they reduce rather than eliminate this concern.

5.2. Theoretical Implications

This study contributes to the literature by offering a bounded, dentistry-specific, and Libya-contextualized theoretical interpretation of after-hours service demands. First, the findings suggest that AHSD in dentistry may not function only as a harmful demand, but may also be associated with more favorable work-related evaluations under particular contextual conditions. The theoretical relevance of this finding lies not in claiming that demanding work is beneficial, but in showing that the meaning attached to such work may matter in how it is experienced. In dentistry, where urgent care often involves immediate pain relief, visible outcomes, and direct patient appreciation, after-hours work may carry professional meaning that is less available in some other settings [5,8]. This should be understood as a context-specific and profession-specific insight rather than a generalizable claim about healthcare work broadly.
Second, the study clarifies the role of compassion satisfaction as a meaning-based psychological mechanism. The mediation results suggest that CS may help explain why demanding service obligations are sometimes associated with more favorable work evaluations by functioning as an interpretive pathway linking urgent patient care, professional fulfillment, and overall work experience [13,95]. This contribution is specific to the dental context studied here and should be interpreted cautiously within the empirical limits of a cross-sectional, self-reported design.
Third, the findings refine the interpretation of POS as a contextual resource. Rather than suggesting that organizational support fundamentally transforms demanding work conditions, the results indicate that POS may modestly and incrementally shape how such demands are interpreted [16,37]. More broadly, the study contributes a dentistry-specific perspective to demand–resource research by highlighting the distinctive combination of clinical autonomy, urgent care exposure, direct patient interaction, and limited team-based support structures as a context in which work demands, emotional meaning, and organizational support interact [6,7,96]. However, these broader theoretical observations remain suggestive and bounded by the study’s empirical scope; they should not be generalized beyond the Libyan dental context without further replication.

5.3. Practical Implications

The findings of this study provide cautious and context-specific implications for dental institutions, healthcare administrators, and professional bodies seeking to support the well-being of dentists. First, the results suggest that after-hours work should not be understood only as a scheduling issue, but also as an experience that may be interpreted differently depending on professional meaning and support conditions. This does not imply that after-hours demands are beneficial; rather, it suggests that how such demands are structured and recognized may matter for how they are experienced. Accordingly, dental institutions may consider structuring after-hours service more carefully through rotating emergency duty schedules, capped on-call hours, and recovery periods following extended shifts. Modest forms of financial and non-financial recognition—such as overtime compensation, emergency service allowances, formal acknowledgment, or patient appreciation mechanisms—may also help reinforce the perceived value of after-hours contributions, although these measures should be understood as incremental supports rather than solutions to the structural challenges of demanding work conditions.
Second, given the mediating role of compassion satisfaction, organizations may also consider low-intensity interventions that support dentists’ emotional resources, such as peer-support groups, brief reflective debriefing after emergency cases, and compassion-focused professional development. These measures may be particularly relevant in demanding settings where emotional exhaustion accumulates over time. Third, because the moderation effects of POS were statistically significant but small in magnitude, organizational support should be framed as an incremental rather than transformative resource. Realistic layered support may therefore be more appropriate than broad policy-level claims, and may include clearer communication about after-hours expectations, transparent workload allocation, some scheduling flexibility, access to confidential counseling, and complementary support from professional associations or dental councils. Overall, the practical value of this study lies in suggesting that relatively small, targeted support mechanisms may modestly improve how demanding work is experienced, particularly in resource-constrained settings, without implying that organizational interventions can substitute for structural reform of workload conditions.

5.4. Limitations and Future Research

This study has four limitations that bound its conclusions. First, the cross-sectional design prevents causal inference; all associations should be interpreted as non-directional, and reverse causality is plausible—dentists with more favorable work experiences may be more willing to accept after-hours duties, while more committed or economically motivated dentists may self-select into such work. Second, reliance on single-source self-reported data raises the possibility of common method inflation; although procedural remedies and statistical checks were applied, the pattern of fully significant hypothesized paths suggests that some associations may partly reflect shared response tendencies, and this should be treated as a substantive interpretive limitation rather than a resolved concern. Third, the removal of reverse-coded POS items (POS5 and POS7) may reflect not only a psychometric issue but also scale adaptation limitations, response-style effects, or contextual mismatch in how organizational support is understood in this setting, which may have affected measurement precision and should be addressed in future validation studies. Fourth, convenience sampling from a single national context limits generalizability; the findings are context-dependent and may not transfer to more stable or better-resourced healthcare systems. Future research should use longitudinal or multi-wave designs, incorporate multi-source data, and replicate the proposed relationships across other dental and healthcare contexts.

6. Conclusions

This study indicates that after-hours service demands are associated with dentists’ overall work experience both directly and indirectly through compassion satisfaction, with perceived organizational support providing a modest, incremental reinforcing context. The findings suggest that demanding work may, under specific conditions, coincide with professional meaning when emotional and organizational resources are present—a contribution that is specific to dentistry and bounded by the Libyan context from which it is drawn. The results are associative rather than causal and should not be taken as evidence that heavier workload inherently improves well-being. Sustaining dentists’ well-being requires attention not only to workload, but also to the emotional and contextual conditions through which demanding work is experienced.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, F.M.A.; supervision, S.M.; project administration, A.A. and S.M.; Validation, F.M.A. and A.A.; Writing—original draft, F.M.A.; Writing—review and editing, F.M.A. and S.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Cyprus Health and Social Sciences University Institutional Review Board (No. KSTU/2025/060 on 28 April 2025).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data from this study can be requested from the corresponding author, Fatma Mansour Abdulmawla. The data are not publicly available due to privacy restrictions.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors report no conflicts of interest.

Appendix A

Table A1. Full Measurement Scale.
Table A1. Full Measurement Scale.
ConstructItem CodeMeasurement ItemsSource
After-Hours Service Demands (AHSD)AHSD1I am frequently required to provide dental care beyond regular working hours.Bakker and Demerouti [72]; Xanthopoulou et al. [73]
AHSD2Emergency dental cases often extend my working day or delay my rest time.
AHSD3I am often contacted about work-related matters during my personal hours.
AHSD4My workload increases significantly when performing after-hours duties.
AHSD5After-hours responsibilities make it difficult for me to recover and rest properly.
Compassion Satisfaction (CS)CS1I get satisfaction from being able to help people.Stamm [74]
CS2I feel invigorated after working with those I help.
CS3I like my work as a healthcare professional.
CS4I am proud of what I can do to help others.
CS5My work makes me feel satisfied.
CS6I have happy thoughts about those I help and how I could help them.
CS7I feel that my work makes a positive difference in others’ lives.
CS8I am proud of the contribution I make to my organization.
CS9I feel optimistic about my ability to help people.
CS10I am pleased with how I am able to help others in my work.
Perceived Organizational Support (POS)POS1My organization really cares about my well-being.Eisenberger et al. [34]
POS2My organization values my contribution to its success.
POS3My organization strongly considers my goals and values.
POS4Help is available from my organization when I have a problem.
POS5My organization shows little concern for me. (reverse-coded)
POS6My organization takes pride in my accomplishments at work.
POS7Even if I did the best job possible, my organization would fail to notice it. (reverse-coded)
POS8My organization is willing to help me when I need a special favor.
Overall Work Experience (OWE)OWE1Overall, I am satisfied with my work experience.Zheng et al. [75]; Schaufeli et al. [76]
OWE2My work provides me with a sense of fulfillment.
OWE3I feel proud of the work that I do.
OWE4I am enthusiastic about my job.
OWE5I feel emotionally engaged with my work.
OWE6My work inspires me to give my best effort.
OWE7My job contributes positively to my quality of life.
OWE8Most days, I am enthusiastic and happy to come to work.

References

  1. Harris, M.; Eaton, K. Exploring Dental Professionals’ Perceptions of Resilience to Dental Environment Stress: A Qualitative Study. Br. Dent. J. 2025, 238, 395–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Aloshaiby, A.; Gaber, A.; Arheiam, A. The Oral Health Care System in Libya: A Case Study. BMC Oral Health 2024, 24, 888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Bermejo, M.M.; Barbi, C. A Sector in Crisis: Seeking Healthcare in Libya a Decade After the Revolution. Conflu. Méditerranée 2024, 128, 51–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Maragha, T.; Atanackovic, J.; Adams, T.; Brondani, M.; Bourgeault, I. Dentists’ Mental Health: Challenges, Supports, and Promising Practices. JDR Clin. Trans. Res. 2025, 10, 100–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Thörel, E.; Pauls, N.; Göritz, A.S. The Association of Work-Related Extended Availability with Recuperation, Well-Being, Life Domain Balance and Work: A Meta-Analysis. Organ. Psychol. Rev. 2022, 12, 387–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Halawani, R.; Ramadan, I.K.; Natto, Z.S. Burnout and Work Engagement Concerning Dental Malpractice among Saudi Dentists: A Cross-Sectional Study. Saudi J. Health Syst. Res. 2024, 4, 204–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Negucioiu, M.; Buduru, S.; Ghiz, S.; Kui, A.; Șoicu, S.; Buduru, R.; Sava, S. Prevalence and Management of Burnout Among Dental Professionals Before, During, and After the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review. Healthcare 2024, 12, 2366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Chiang, N.-T.; Kao, R.-H.; Ma, H.-Y.; Cho, C.-C. The Impact of After-Hours Messaging on Job Stress and Burnout among Taiwan’s Border Police: The Roles of Social Support and Coping Strategies. Humanit. Soc. Sci. Commun. 2025, 12, 587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Chen, T.-C.; Lai, E.H.-H.; Lo, F.-Y.; Wang, L.-J.; Lin, W. Challenges and Resilience of Taiwan’s Oral Health Care System after Covid-19 Pandemic. J. Formos. Med. Assoc. 2024, 123, S157–S162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Mills, I.; Knights, J.; Ellwood, F.; Witton, R.; Young, L. Me, We, They: Identifying the Key Stressors Affecting the Dental Team. Br. Dent. J. 2025, 239, 197–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Opoku-Ansah, N.A.; Gallagher, J.E.; Niven, V. Key Determinants of Health and Wellbeing of Dental Nurses: A Rapid Review of over Two Decades of Research. BDJ Open 2025, 11, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kim, H.; Shin, K.; Hwang, J. Too Much May Be a Bad Thing: The Difference between Challenge and Hindrance Job Demands. Curr. Psychol. 2024, 43, 6180–6192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. McGrath, K.; Matthews, L.R.; Heard, R. Predictors of Compassion Satisfaction and Compassion Fatigue in Health Care Workers Providing Health and Rehabilitation Services in Rural and Remote Locations: A Scoping Review. Aust. J. Rural Health 2022, 30, 264–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Singh, J.; Karanika-Murray, M.; Baguley, T.; Hudson, J. A Systematic Review of Job Demands and Resources Associated with Compassion Fatigue in Mental Health Professionals. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 6987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Sacco, T.L.; Copel, L.C. Compassion Satisfaction: A Concept Analysis in Nursing: SACCO and COPEL. Nurs. Forum 2018, 53, 76–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Al’Ararah, K.; Çağlar, D.; Aljuhmani, H.Y. Mitigating Job Burnout in Jordanian Public Healthcare: The Interplay between Ethical Leadership, Organizational Climate, and Role Overload. Behav. Sci. 2024, 14, 490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wang, Y.; Song, K.; Guo, M.; Ye, L. Back to Work, Running on Empty? How Recovery Needs and Perceived Organizational Support Shape Employees’ Vigor Upon Return to Work. Behav. Sci. 2025, 15, 889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Li, Y.; Chen, C.; Yuan, Y. Evolving the Job Demands-Resources Framework to JD-R 3.0: The Impact of after-Hours Connectivity and Organizational Support on Employee Psychological Distress. Acta Psychol. 2025, 253, 104710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Bakker, A.B.; Demerouti, E. Job Demands–Resources Theory: Frequently Asked Questions. J. Occup. Health Psychol. 2024, 29, 188–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Hobfoll, S.E. Conservation of Resources: A New Attempt at Conceptualizing Stress. Am. Psychol. 1989, 44, 513–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Bon, A.T.; Shire, A.M. Review of Conservation of Resources Theory in Job Demands and Resources Model. Int. J. Glob. Optim. Its Appl. 2022, 1, 236–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Chen, I.-S. Extending the Job Demands–Resources Model to Understand the Effect of the Interactions between Home and Work Domains on Work Engagement. Stress Health 2024, 40, e3362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kumar, S.; Mohammadnezhad, M. Perceptions of Dental Health Professionals (DHPs) on Job Satisfaction in Fiji: A Qualitative Study. BMC Health Serv. Res. 2022, 22, 1261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Assiry, A.A.; Alnemari, A.; Adil, A.H.; Karobari, M.I.; Sayed, F.R.; Marya, A.; Basheer, S.N.; Marya, C.M. Extensive Evaluation of the Overall Workplace Experience and Job Satisfaction of Dentists in Saudi Arabia. Biomed. Res. Int. 2022, 2022, 4968489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Le, V.N.T.; Dang, M.-H.; Kim, J.-G.; Yang, Y.-M.; Lee, D.-W. Dentist Job Satisfaction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Int. Dent. J. 2021, 71, 369–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kohnen, D.; De Witte, H.; Schaufeli, W.B.; Dello, S.; Bruyneel, L.; Sermeus, W. Engaging Leadership and Nurse Well-Being: The Role of the Work Environment and Work Motivation—A Cross-Sectional Study. Hum. Resour. Health 2024, 22, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zhang, S.; Shi, Y.; Liu, B.; Wang, H.; Zhao, X.; Wang, X.; Sun, T. Job Demands and Resources and Their Relationship with Satisfaction and Thriving at Work in a Sample of Chinese Doctors: A Cross-Sectional Study. BMJ Open 2021, 11, e045745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Mahdavi, N.; Tapak, L.; Darvishi, E.; Doosti-Irani, A.; Shafiee Motlagh, M. Unraveling the Interplay between Mental Workload, Occupational Fatigue, Physiological Responses and Cognitive Performance in Office Workers. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 17866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Demerouti, E.; Bakker, A.B. Job Demands-Resources Theory in Times of Crises: New Propositions. Organ. Psychol. Rev. 2023, 13, 209–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Lee, D.-J.; Sirgy, M.J. Organizational Strategies for Work-Life Balance: For Whom, Why, and Under What Conditions; Springer Nature: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  31. Galanakis, M.D.; Tsitouri, E. Positive Psychology in the Working Environment. Job Demands-Resources Theory, Work Engagement and Burnout: A Systematic Literature Review. Front. Psychol. 2022, 13, 1022102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Li, M.; Jameel, A.; Ma, Z.; Sun, H.; Hussain, A.; Mubeen, S. Prism of Employee Performance Through the Means of Internal Support: A Study of Perceived Organizational Support. Psychol. Res. Behav. Manag. 2022, 15, 965–976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Khalid, J.; Weng, Q.D.; Luqman, A.; Rasheed, M.I.; Hina, M. After-Hours Work-Related Technology Use and Individuals’ Deviance: The Role of Interruption Overload, Psychological Transition and Task Closure. Kybernetes 2021, 52, 158–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Eisenberger, R.; Huntington, R.; Hutchison, S.; Sowa, D. Perceived Organizational Support. J. Appl. Psychol. 1986, 71, 500–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Holmgreen, L.; Tirone, V.; Gerhart, J.; Hobfoll, S.E. Conservation of Resources Theory. In The Handbook of Stress and Health: A Guide to Research and Practice; Cooper, C.L., Quick, J.C., Eds.; Willey: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  36. Hong, Y.; Xu, M.; Furnell, S. Situational Support and Information Security Behavioural Intention: A Comparative Study Using Conservation of Resources Theory. Behav. Inf. Technol. 2024, 43, 523–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Longo, B.A.; Schmaltz, S.P.; Williams, S.C.; Shanafelt, T.D.; Sinsky, C.A.; Baker, D.W. Clinician Well-Being Assessment and Interventions in Joint Commission–Accredited Hospitals and Federally Qualified Health Centers. Jt. Comm. J. Qual. Patient Saf. 2023, 49, 511–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Dijk, S.W.; Hunink, M.G.M. Nurturing Health, Resilience, and Well-Being among Medical Imaging Professionals: Creating Resilient Organizations for Sustainable Healthcare. Eur. Radiol. 2024, 34, 2168–2170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Alarcon, G.M.; Lyons, J.B. The Relationship of Engagement and Job Satisfaction in Working Samples. J. Psychol. 2011, 145, 463–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Mothema, M.M.; Ramasimu, N.F.; Maake, G. Is There a Relationship between Job Satisfaction and Work Engagement? Int. J. Res. Bus. Soc. Sci. 2025, 14, 160–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Reinke, K.; Ohly, S. Double-Edged Effects of Work-Related Technology Use after Hours on Employee Well-Being and Recovery: The Role of Appraisal and Its Determinants. Ger. J. Hum. Resour. Manag. Z. Für Pers. 2021, 35, 224–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Anderson, R.; Thomas, D.W.; Phillips, C.J. The Effectiveness of Out-of-Hours Dental Services: I. Pain Relief and Oral Health Outcome. Br. Dent. J. 2005, 198, 91–97; discussion 88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Albo, Y.; Leck, E.; Nathan, O.; Wolf, N.; Zaidise, E. COR and CORONA: Analysis of COVID-19’s Subjective Lasting Impact on Wellbeing, Employing Conservation of Resources Theory. J. Public Health 2025, 47, 637–645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Kalenderian, E.; Tungare, S.; Mehta, U.; Hamid, S.; Mungia, R.; Yansane, A.-I.; Holmes, D.; Funkhouser, K.; Ibarra-Noriega, A.M.; Urata, J.; et al. Patient and Dentist Perspectives on Collecting Patient Reported Outcomes after Painful Dental Procedures in the National Dental PBRN. BMC Oral Health 2024, 24, 201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Malloy, E.; O’neill, E.; Gladwell, V. Access to Urgent Care Among Individuals Experiencing Health Inequalities: A Scoping Review and Recommendations; University of Suffolk: Ipswich, UK, 2025. [Google Scholar]
  46. Mendes, M.S.S.; Ferreira, C.L.; Jardini, M.A.N.; Childs, C.A.; Marchini, L. The Effects of Compassionate Care on Oral Health Outcomes: A Scoping Review. Spec. Care Dent. 2025, 45, e13087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Haji Seyed Javadi, S.K. From Patient Experience to Dental Service Return Visits: A Narrative Review of Strategies for Improving Dental Care Services. J. Patient Exp. 2025, 12, 23743735251406349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Garnett, A.; Hui, L.; Oleynikov, C.; Boamah, S. Compassion Fatigue in Healthcare Providers: A Scoping Review. BMC Health Serv. Res. 2023, 23, 1336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Rostami, M.; Asadi, N. The Impact of Chronic Occupational Exposure to Pain on Dentists’ Mental Health. J. Oral Dent. Health Nexus 2025, 2, 56–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Aminihajibashi, S.; Jensen, T.K.; Skar, A.-M.S. Exploring Key Job Demands and Resources in Norwegian Child Mental Health Services: A Cross-Sectional Study of Associations with and Relationship between Compassion Satisfaction, Burnout, Secondary Traumatic Stress and Turnover Intention. Front. Public Health 2024, 12, 1304345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. San Román-Niaves, M.; Coo, C.; Llorens, S.; Salanova, M. The Mediating Role of Compassion between Social Job Resources, and Healthy Healthcare Professionals: A Cross-Sectional Study with Gender Perspective. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 7500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Knutt, A.; Boyd, L.D.; Adams, J.-L.; Vineyard, J. Compassion Satisfaction, Compassion Fatigue, and Burnout among Dental Hygienists in the United States. J. Dent. Hyg. 2022, 96, 34–42. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  53. Zhou, W.; Xu, H.; Fang, T.; Xie, B.; Lu, Y. Behind the “Emotional Exhaustion” of Physical Education Teachers: A Chain Mediation Model. Acta Psychol. 2025, 253, 104729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Vančová, V.; Halamová, J.; Šoková, B. Compassion Satisfaction and Compassion Fatigue among Teachers: Mixed Study. Teach. Teach. Educ. 2026, 172, 105350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Marklund, S.; Huang, K.; Zohouri, D.; Wahlström, J. Dentists Working Conditions—Factors Associated with Perceived Workload. Acta Odontol. Scand. 2021, 79, 296–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Yanbei, R.; Dongdong, M.; Yun, L.; Ning, W.; Fengping, Q. Does Perceived Organization Support Moderates the Relationships between Work Frustration and Burnout among Intensive Care Unit Nurses? A Cross-Sectional Survey. BMC Nurs. 2023, 22, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Imran, M.Y.; Elahi, N.S.; Abid, G.; Ashfaq, F.; Ilyas, S. Impact of Perceived Organizational Support on Work Engagement: Mediating Mechanism of Thriving and Flourishing. J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2020, 6, 82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Cheng, K.; Cao, X.; Guo, L.; Xia, Q. Work Connectivity Behavior After-Hours and Job Satisfaction: Examining the Moderating Effects of Psychological Entitlement and Perceived Organizational Support. Pers. Rev. 2021, 51, 2277–2293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Tayfur Ekmekci, O.; Xhako, D.; Metin Camgoz, S. The Buffering Effect of Perceived Organizational Support on the Relationships Among Workload, Work-Family Interference, and Affective Commitment: A Study on Nurses. J. Nurs. Res. 2021, 29, e140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Ike, O.O.; Eze, I.C.; Nnadozie, E.E. Perceived Organizational Support as a Buffer between Organizational Cynicism and Workplace Deviance in Nursing. Discov. Psychol. 2025, 5, 138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Alsaeiti, K.D.; Elkadiki, A.; Hamedh, M.A.I.; Ezwaie, R.M.; Younis, S.M.; Elfigih, S.O. Burnout among Physicians at Medical Departments in Benghazi-Libya. Libyan Int. Med. Univ. J. 2022, 07, 045–050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Arhoma, N.; Tantawi, M.E.; Arheiam, A. Career Expectations and the Motivating Factors for Studying Dentistry in Libya. BMC Med. Educ. 2022, 22, 849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Alraqiq, H.; Eddali, A.; Boufis, R. Prevalence of Dental Caries and Associated Factors among School-Aged Children in Tripoli, Libya: A Cross-Sectional Study. BMC Oral Health 2021, 21, 224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Hospaccx Healthcare Scenario of Libya 2023: Key Insights 2023. Available online: https://hospaccxconsulting.com/healthcare-scenario-of-libya/ (accessed on 26 April 2026).
  65. Yamane, T. Elementary Sampling Theory; Prentice Hall: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 1967. [Google Scholar]
  66. Hair, J.; Hult, G.T.M.; Ringle, C.M.; Sarstedt, M. A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling, 3rd ed.; SAGE Publications, Inc: Los Angeles, CA, USA, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  67. Arhoma, N.; Arheiam, A. The Dental Workforce in Libya: An Overlooked Research Topic. Libyan J. Dent. 2022, 6, 1–3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Etikan, I.; Musa, S.A.; Alkassim, R.S. Comparison of Convenience Sampling and Purposive Sampling. Am. J. Theor. Appl. Stat. 2016, 5, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Awwad, R.I.; Aljuhmani, H.Y.; Hamdan, S. Examining the Relationships Between Frontline Bank Employees’ Job Demands and Job Satisfaction: A Mediated Moderation Model. Sage Open 2022, 12, 21582440221079880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Baruch, Y.; Holtom, B.C. Survey Response Rate Levels and Trends in Organizational Research. Hum. Relat. 2008, 61, 1139–1160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Brislin, R.W. Translation and Content Analysis of Oral and Written Materials. In Handbook of Cross-Cultural Psychology: Methodology; Triandis, H.C., Berry, J.W., Eds.; Allyn and Bacon: Boston, MA, USA, 1980; pp. 389–444. [Google Scholar]
  72. Bakker, A.B.; Demerouti, E. The Job Demands-Resources Model: State of the Art. J. Manag. Psychol. 2007, 22, 309–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Xanthopoulou, D.; Bakker, A.B.; Demerouti, E.; Schaufeli, W.B. The Role of Personal Resources in the Job Demands-Resources Model. Int. J. Stress Manag. 2007, 14, 121–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Stamm, B. The Concise ProQOL Manual: The Concise Manual for the Professional Quality of Life Scale, 2nd ed.; ProQOL.org: Pocatello, ID, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  75. Zheng, X.; Zhu, W.; Zhao, H.; Zhang, C. Employee Well-Being in Organizations: Theoretical Model, Scale Development, and Cross-Cultural Validation. J. Organ. Behav. 2015, 36, 621–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Schaufeli, W.B.; Bakker, A.B.; Salanova, M. The Measurement of Work Engagement with a Short Questionnaire: A Cross-National Study. Educ. Psychol. Meas. 2006, 66, 701–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Podsakoff, P.M.; MacKenzie, S.B.; Lee, J.-Y.; Podsakoff, N.P. Common Method Biases in Behavioral Research: A Critical Review of the Literature and Recommended Remedies. J. Appl. Psychol. 2003, 88, 879–903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Elkhweildi, M.; Vetbuje, B.; Alzubi, A.B.; Aljuhmani, H.Y. Leading with Green Ethics: How Environmentally Specific Ethical Leadership Enhances Employee Job Performance Through Communication and Engagement. Sustainability 2025, 17, 7923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Kock, N. Common Method Bias in PLS-SEM: A Full Collinearity Assessment Approach. Int. J. e-Collab. 2015, 11, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Hair, J.F.; Risher, J.J.; Sarstedt, M.; Ringle, C.M. When to Use and How to Report the Results of PLS-SEM. Eur. Bus. Rev. 2019, 31, 2–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Chin, W.; Cheah, J.-H.; Liu, Y.; Ting, H.; Lim, X.-J.; Cham, T.H. Demystifying the Role of Causal-Predictive Modeling Using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling in Information Systems Research. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 2020, 120, 2161–2209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Streukens, S.; Leroi-Werelds, S. Bootstrapping and PLS-SEM: A Step-by-Step Guide to Get More out of Your Bootstrap Results. Eur. Manag. J. 2016, 34, 618–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Hair, J.F.; Black, W.C.; Babin, B.J.; Anderson, R.E. Multivariate Data Analysis; Pearson Education Limited: Harlow, UK, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  84. Slil, E.; Iyiola, K.; Alzubi, A.; Aljuhmani, H.Y. Impact of Safety Leadership and Employee Morale on Safety Performance: The Moderating Role of Harmonious Safety Passion. Buildings 2025, 15, 186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Fornell, C.; Larcker, D.F. Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. J. Mark. Res. 1981, 18, 39–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Henseler, J.; Ringle, C.M.; Sarstedt, M. A New Criterion for Assessing Discriminant Validity in Variance-Based Structural Equation Modeling. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 2015, 43, 115–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Enbaia, E.; Alzubi, A.; Iyiola, K.; Aljuhmani, H.Y. The Interplay Between Environmental Ethics and Sustainable Performance: Does Organizational Green Culture and Green Innovation Really Matter? Sustainability 2024, 16, 10230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Al-Geitany, S.; Aljuhmani, H.Y.; Emeagwali, O.L.; Nasr, E. Consumer Behavior in the Post-COVID-19 Era: The Impact of Perceived Interactivity on Behavioral Intention in the Context of Virtual Conferences. Sustainability 2023, 15, 8600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Cohen, J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd ed.; Routledge: Hillsdale, NJ, USA, 1988. [Google Scholar]
  90. Rajhi, M.; Aljuhmani, H.Y. Fostering Sustainable Innovation Through Communication Quality: The Sequential Role of Trust in Leadership and Organizational Commitment in Team-Based Enterprises. Sustainability 2026, 18, 554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Carrión, G.C.; Nitzl, C.; Roldán, J.L. Mediation Analyses in Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling: Guidelines and Empirical Examples. In Partial Least Squares Path Modeling: Basic Concepts, Methodological Issues and Applications; Latan, H., Noonan, R., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2017; pp. 173–195. [Google Scholar]
  92. Hayes, A.F. Partial, Conditional, and Moderated Moderated Mediation: Quantification, Inference, and Interpretation. Commun. Monogr. 2018, 85, 4–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Farnana, K.; Alzubi, A.B.; Aljuhmani, H.Y.; Khadem, A. Fostering a Green Workplace: How Responsible Leadership Inspires Voluntary Green Behavior through Perceived Insider Status and Green Work Climate. Kybernetes 2026, 1–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Nadarajan, S.S.; Chui, P.L.; Lee, W.L.; Zaini, N.H. Factors Influencing Compassion Satisfaction and Compassion Fatigue among Nurses: A Study in a Tertiary Hospital. BMC Nurs. 2025, 24, 93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Okon, S.A.; Khan, T.N.; Duffy, N.J.; Roan, C.C.; Hoopsick, R.A. Effects of Compassion Satisfaction, Burnout, and Secondary Traumatic Stress on Current Drug Use among Healthcare Workers: Differences by Occupational Level. Addict. Behav. Rep. 2025, 21, 100584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Căminișteanu, F.; Vorovenci, A.; Perieanu, V.Ș.; Petri, S.-A.; Burlibașa, L.; David, M.; Drăguș, A.C.; Burlibașa, M. Occupational Diseases among Dental Personnel: A Scoping Review. J. Med. Life 2025, 18, 526–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Conceptual Model. Note: Solid arrows represent direct effects, while dashed arrows represent moderating and moderated mediation effects.
Figure 1. Conceptual Model. Note: Solid arrows represent direct effects, while dashed arrows represent moderating and moderated mediation effects.
Healthcare 14 01239 g001
Figure 2. Path analysis. Note: Circles represent latent constructs; solid arrows indicate direct effects, and dashed arrows indicate moderating effects.
Figure 2. Path analysis. Note: Circles represent latent constructs; solid arrows indicate direct effects, and dashed arrows indicate moderating effects.
Healthcare 14 01239 g002
Figure 3. Moderating effect of POS on the AHSD–CS relationship.
Figure 3. Moderating effect of POS on the AHSD–CS relationship.
Healthcare 14 01239 g003
Figure 4. Moderating effect of POS on the AHSD–OWE relationship.
Figure 4. Moderating effect of POS on the AHSD–OWE relationship.
Healthcare 14 01239 g004
Figure 5. Moderated mediation effect of POS on the indirect AHSD–OWE relationship through CS.
Figure 5. Moderated mediation effect of POS on the indirect AHSD–OWE relationship through CS.
Healthcare 14 01239 g005
Table 1. Demographic Profile of Respondents.
Table 1. Demographic Profile of Respondents.
Demographic VariableCategoryFrequency (n = 450)Percentage (%)
GenderMale25957.6
Female19142.4
Age Group (years)20–298518.9
30–3918741.6
40–4911826.2
50 and above6013.3
Education LevelBachelor’s Degree (BDS)27861.8
Master’s Degree11425.3
Doctorate (PhD)5812.9
Years of Professional ExperienceLess than 5 years7316.2
5–10 years17639.1
11–15 years12628.0
More than 15 years7516.7
Type of FacilityPublic Hospital/Health Center16135.8
Specialized Dental Center9922.0
Private Dental Clinic14331.8
Polyclinic/Other4710.4
City/RegionTripoli13930.9
Benghazi9721.6
Misrata7817.3
Sabha6113.6
Al Bayda4510.0
Zawiya184.0
Derna122.6
Work StatusFull-Time38385.1
Part-Time6714.9
Table 2. Measurement model test.
Table 2. Measurement model test.
ConstructsItemsMeanStd. DeviationOuter LoadingsVIFCACRAVE
After-Hours Service Demands (AHSD)0.8240.8560.650
AHSD14.4930.6300.6861.157
AHSD24.3980.6030.8251.949
AHSD34.3950.6170.7911.817
AHSD44.2460.6150.7521.573
AHSD54.2840.6670.8011.596
Compassion Satisfaction (CS)0.8790.8950.664
CS14.2910.9590.7851.289
CS24.2580.5720.7271.639
CS34.0920.5460.7981.850
CS43.9920.5830.7261.617
CS54.0290.5780.7501.670
CS64.1760.6740.7171.754
CS73.9980.6770.7351.487
CS84.1650.6750.7581.415
CS94.1060.6870.7201.833
CS104.2770.6980.7551.789
Perceived Organizational Support (POS)0.8360.8610.536
POS14.0060.7030.8151.354
POS24.0670.7470.7911.349
POS34.0950.5370.8761.452
POS44.4290.5740.7211.190
POS52.3641.061--
POS64.1150.5310.7441.205
POS72.7681.150--
POS83.2320.9960.7851.436
Overall Work Experience (OWE)0.8130.8330.594
OWE13.8460.7320.7551.240
OWE24.1680.5560.7461.729
OWE34.1570.5790.7611.743
OWE43.6720.6980.6851.109
OWE54.1620.7200.7921.670
OWE64.1460.6500.7231.733
OWE73.6890.7240.7621.488
OWE83.4760.7290.8921.385
Note: Variance Inflation Factor (VIF), Cronbach Alpha (CA), Composite Reliability (CR), Average Variance Extracted (AVE). POS5 and POS7 were reverse-coded items removed due to low loadings.
Table 3. Discriminant validity test.
Table 3. Discriminant validity test.
ConstructsAHSDCSOWEPOS
Heterotrait–Monotrait (HTMT) ratio
AHSD0
CS0.5950
OWE0.6100.6410
POS0.6550.6400.6780
Fornell–Larcker criterion
AHSD0.742
CS0.6830.785
OWE0.6740.6810.728
POS0.6690.7190.6710.680
Note: After-Hours Service Demands (AHSD), Compassion Satisfaction (CS), Overall Work Experience (OWE), Perceived Organizational Support (POS).
Table 4. Structural model results.
Table 4. Structural model results.
PathsRelationshipsSample EstimateStandard ErrorT-StatisticsVIFf2CIsp-ValuesDecision
2.5%97.5%
Direct effect
H1AHSD → OWE0.2530.0495.1732.2750.1710.1550.3420.000Supported
H2AHSD → CS0.2150.0484.4842.1330.1660.1220.3110.000Supported
H3CS → OWE0.3440.0605.6832.0670.1970.2220.4630.000Supported
Indirect effect
H4AHSD → CS → OWE0.0740.0233.2071.000-0.0350.1250.001Supported
Note: After-Hours Service Demands (AHSD), Compassion Satisfaction (CS), and Overall Work Experience (OWE).
Table 5. Moderation and moderated mediation effect results.
Table 5. Moderation and moderated mediation effect results.
PathsRelationshipsSample EstimateT-Statisticsp-ValuesCIsResults
2.5%97.5%
Interaction effect
H5POS × AHSD → CS0.0543.0070.0030.0140.087Supported
H6POS × AHSD → OWE0.0482.6190.0090.0130.086Supported
H7Conditional indirect effect of AHSD on OWE via CS at different levels of POS0.096-0.0020.0160.168Supported
Note: After-Hours Service Demands (AHSD), Compassion Satisfaction (CS), Overall Work Experience (OWE), Perceived Organizational Support (POS).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Abdulmawla, F.M.; Mohammad, S.; Arslan, A. After-Hours Service Demands and Dentist Well-Being: Unpacking the Roles of Compassion Satisfaction and Organizational Support. Healthcare 2026, 14, 1239. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare14091239

AMA Style

Abdulmawla FM, Mohammad S, Arslan A. After-Hours Service Demands and Dentist Well-Being: Unpacking the Roles of Compassion Satisfaction and Organizational Support. Healthcare. 2026; 14(9):1239. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare14091239

Chicago/Turabian Style

Abdulmawla, Fatma Mansour, Sami Mohammad, and Ayse Arslan. 2026. "After-Hours Service Demands and Dentist Well-Being: Unpacking the Roles of Compassion Satisfaction and Organizational Support" Healthcare 14, no. 9: 1239. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare14091239

APA Style

Abdulmawla, F. M., Mohammad, S., & Arslan, A. (2026). After-Hours Service Demands and Dentist Well-Being: Unpacking the Roles of Compassion Satisfaction and Organizational Support. Healthcare, 14(9), 1239. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare14091239

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop