This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Open AccessArticle
Validity of Center of Pressure Path Length Measured Using a Wii Balance Board for Fall Risk Screening in Community-Dwelling Older Adults
by
Myeong-Min Ju
Myeong-Min Ju
and
Dae-Sung Park
Dae-Sung Park *
Department of Physical Therapy, Konyang University, Daejeon 35365, Republic of Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Healthcare 2026, 14(12), 1685; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare14121685 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 9 April 2026
/
Revised: 2 June 2026
/
Accepted: 10 June 2026
/
Published: 12 June 2026
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Falls among older adults are a major public health concern. Although instrumented posturography provides objective balance and fall-risk assessment, its cost and limited portability restrict widespread use. This study aimed to examine the construct and concurrent validity of center of pressure (COP) path length measured using a Wii Balance Board (WBB) in relation to a clinically established posturographic fall-risk construct in community-dwelling older adults and to explore its discriminatory performance across multiple sensory postural conditions. Methods: Sixty adults aged ≥ 65 years participated in this cross-sectional study. COP path length was measured using a WBB under eight postural conditions and compared with the Fall Index derived from a conventional posturography system (TetraxⓇ). Functional performance was assessed using the Four Square Step Test and the Five Times Sit-to-Stand test. Pearson correlation, receiver operating characteristic (ROC), and exploratory regression analyses were performed. Results: COP path length showed significant positive correlations with the TetraxⓇ Fall Index across all conditions (r = 0.349–0.561, p < 0.01) and with functional performance tests under most postural conditions (p < 0.05), except for the Normal stability, Open eyes (NO) condition. ROC analysis demonstrated acceptable-to-good discriminatory performance for classifying TetraxⓇ Fall Index-based risk status (AUC = 0.783–0.865), with the NO condition showing the highest discriminatory capability (AUC = 0.865). Exploratory regression models based on selected postural conditions explained 12.1–40.7% of the variance in the reference Fall Index. Conclusions: COP path length measured using a WBB demonstrated construct validity and acceptable discriminatory capacity in relation to a conventional posturographic fall-risk construct in community-dwelling older adults. These findings support the exploratory feasibility of simplified WBB-based balance assessment approaches for community and clinical screening contexts. Further longitudinal studies incorporating prospective fall outcomes are required to establish predictive validity and broader clinical applicability.
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Ju, M.-M.; Park, D.-S.
Validity of Center of Pressure Path Length Measured Using a Wii Balance Board for Fall Risk Screening in Community-Dwelling Older Adults. Healthcare 2026, 14, 1685.
https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare14121685
AMA Style
Ju M-M, Park D-S.
Validity of Center of Pressure Path Length Measured Using a Wii Balance Board for Fall Risk Screening in Community-Dwelling Older Adults. Healthcare. 2026; 14(12):1685.
https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare14121685
Chicago/Turabian Style
Ju, Myeong-Min, and Dae-Sung Park.
2026. "Validity of Center of Pressure Path Length Measured Using a Wii Balance Board for Fall Risk Screening in Community-Dwelling Older Adults" Healthcare 14, no. 12: 1685.
https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare14121685
APA Style
Ju, M.-M., & Park, D.-S.
(2026). Validity of Center of Pressure Path Length Measured Using a Wii Balance Board for Fall Risk Screening in Community-Dwelling Older Adults. Healthcare, 14(12), 1685.
https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare14121685
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details
here.
Article Metrics
Article Access Statistics
For more information on the journal statistics, click
here.
Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.