3.2. Hypotheses Testing
In order to test hypothesis H1, the assessment of age differences between (1) the three different breastfeeding methods (i.e., complete reliance on baby food and/or supplements, EB, or integrated/combined EB and baby food) and (2) breastfeeding duration, one-way analyses of variance (one-way ANOVAs), were employed.
In assessing the association between age and breastfeeding methods (exclusive; N = 165, M = 31.73, SD = 4.76/combined; N = 66, M = 30.00, SD = 4.92/baby food; N = 43, M = 29.6, SD = 3.28), the results indicated a significant main effect: F(2, 271) = 3.60, p < 0.05. Hence, in order to gauge the source of these significant differences, Tukey’s HSD post hoc tests were performed, revealing only that those who preferred EB were slightly older than those who opted for combined breastfeeding (p < 0.05). No other significant differences were discovered between these groups.
In assessing the association between age and breastfeeding duration during the last 4 months (did not breastfeed at all; N = 19, M = 28.95, SD = 3.52/up to 1 month; N = 10, M = 27.20, SD = 4.61/up to 2 months; N = 6, M = 27.33, SD = 5.05/up to 3 months; N = 25, M = 32.20, SD = 8.73/up to 4 months; N = 20, M = 28.45, SD = 5.83/above 4 months; N = 194, M = 31.69, SD = 4.46), the results indicated a significant main effect: F(5, 268) = 4.40, p < 0.01. In order to gauge the source of these significant differences, Tukey’s HSD post hoc tests were performed, revealing that those who breastfed for >4 months were slightly older than those who did so up to 4 months (p < 0.05) and up to 1 month (p < 0.05). No other significant differences were discovered between these groups.
In order to test hypothesis H2, the assessment of the association between the number of children prior to the recent delivery and (1) the three different breastfeeding methods (i.e., only baby food, EB, integrated/combined breastfeeding) and (2) breastfeeding duration, chi-square tests were performed. Statistically significant differences were found among the different breastfeeding methods—χ
2 (6, N = 274) = 41.15,
p < 0.01,
rc = 0.27. Results indicated that (1) those with no children before the current delivery preferred baby food or combined breastfeeding; (2) those with one child were divided between the three different breastfeeding methods (respectively, 28.6%, 29.5%, and 41.9%); All the others preferred EB in this order-first, those with three children (86.8%), second those with two children (62.5%), third those with one child (60.4%); statistically significant differences were also found amongst those with a number of children before the last birth with breastfeeding duration: (6, N = 274) = 45.55,
p < 0.01,
rc = 0.23. All the women in the sample preferred to breastfeed for more than 4 months, in this order -firstly, women with three children, 89.7%, preferred breastfeeding longer than 4 months; secondly, women with two children, 81.3%; thirdly, women with one child 71.7%; fourthly, women with no previous children 53.3% (
Table 2 and
Table 3).
In order to test hypothesis H3, the assessment of the association between ethnic affiliation (Muslim Arabs/Christian Arabs/Druze) or geographic region (the north, center, and south of the country) and (1) the three different breastfeeding methods (i.e., only baby food, EB, integrated/combined breastfeeding) and (2) breastfeeding duration, chi-square tests were performed.
Statistically significant differences were found among the different ethnic groups—χ
2 (4, N = 274) = 31.93,
p < 0.01,
rc = 0.24. The results indicate that (1) Muslim women were divided between the three different breastfeeding methods (respectively, 20.4%, 29.6%, and 50%) and (2) Christian Arabs (67.5%) and Druze (93.8%) preferred EB (
Table 4).
Statistically significant differences were found among the different ethnic groups—χ
2 (10, N = 274) = 22.73,
p < 0.01,
rc = 0.20. The results indicate that (1) Muslim Arab women preferred to breastfeed for >4 months. Firstly, the Druze, 95.8%; secondly, the Christian Arabs, 75%; thirdly, the Muslim Arabs, 63.4% (
Table 5).
Statistically significant differences were found among the different regions: χ
2 (4, N = 274) = 14.70,
p < 0.01,
rc = 0.16. The results indicate that (1) those living in the north (63.2%) and south (60.2%) of the country preferred EB and (2) those living in the center were divided between the three different breastfeeding methods (respectively, 31.6%, 21.1%, and 47.4%). Statistically significant differences were found among the different regions and breastfeeding durations: χ
2 (10, N = 274) = 25.36,
p < 0.01,
rc = 0.22. The results indicate that women from all regions preferred to breastfeed >4 months; firstly, women from the north, 75.9%; secondly, women from the center, 52.6%; thirdly, women from the South, 48.6% (
Table 6 and
Table 7).
There are several possible socioeconomic and cultural explanations for why Christian and Druze mothers show higher exclusive breastfeeding rates than Muslim mothers. These relate to employment and workforce participation—Muslim Arab women in Israel have higher workforce participation rates compared to Druze women, many of whom tend to stay at home longer post birth due to traditional family structures. This might allow Druze mothers to breastfeed for longer durations.
In order to test hypothesis H4, the assessment of the association between educational level (non-academic/academic) and (1) the three different breastfeeding methods (i.e., only baby food, EB, integrated/combined breastfeeding) and (2) breastfeeding duration, chi-square tests were performed. No statistically significant differences were found among the educational levels of the groups in relation to breastfeeding methods: χ2 (2, N = 274) = 4.01, p > 0.05, rc = 0.12, and no statistically significant differences were found among the educational levels of the groups in relation to breastfeeding duration: χ2 (2, N = 274) = 2.49, p > 0.05, rc = 10. However, the effect of education may be more pronounced during the initiation phase, and less so in the continuation phase. Other factors such as family support and employment status might play a larger role in the continuation of EB over time.
Although higher education is often linked to a greater awareness of the benefits of breastfeeding, it may also be associated with greater workforce participation. This could lead to earlier breastfeeding cessation due to time constraints and work-related challenges.
Non-academic mothers, despite a lower formal education, may receive stronger familial encouragement to continue EB, counteracting the expected influence of education.
Cultural and Community Influences: In Arab society, breastfeeding decisions may be less influenced by formal education and more by cultural norms, family traditions, and religious beliefs. Since Arab families, especially in rural areas, strongly support breastfeeding regardless of education, the expected effect of education on breastfeeding duration may be diluted.
In order to test hypothesis H5, the assessment of religiosity level differences between (1) the three different breastfeeding methods (i.e., only baby food, EB, integrated/combined breastfeeding) and (2) breastfeeding duration, one-way analyses of variance (one-way ANOVAs) were employed.
In gauging the association between religiosity level and breastfeeding methods (exclusive; N = 65, M = 4.70, SD = 0.65/combined; N = 66, M = 4.37, SD = 0.71/baby food; N = 43, M = 4.27, SD = 0.97), the results indicate a significant main effect—F(2, 271) = 8.70, p < 0.01. Hence, in order to reveal the source of these significant differences, Tukey’s HSD post hoc tests were performed, finding that those who preferred EB reported higher religiosity levels than (1) those who preferred combined breastfeeding (p < 0.01) and (2) only baby food (p < 0.01). No other significant differences were discovered between these groups.
In gauging the association between religiosity level and breastfeeding duration during the last 4 months (did not breastfeed at all; N = 19, M = 3.97, SD = 1.24/up to 1 month; N = 10, M = 4.27, SD = 1.05/up to 2 months; N = 6, M = 3.61, SD = 0.83/up to 3 months; N = 25, M = 4.55, SD = 0.48/up to 4 months; N = 20, M = 4.35, SD = 0.90/above 4 months; N = 194, M = 4.67, SD = 0.61), the results indicate a significant main effect: F(5, 268) = 6.54, p < 0.01. In order to reveal the source of these significant differences, Tukey’s HSD post hoc tests were performed, indicating only that those who breastfed for >4 months reported a higher religiosity level than (1) those who preferred not to breastfeed (p < 0.01) and (2) those who breastfed up to 2 months (p < 0.01). No other significant differences were discovered between these groups.
In order to test hypothesis H6, the assessment of the association between prior instruction(s) received regarding breastfeeding (did not receive any/group instructional program/personal or private instructional program) and (1) the three different breastfeeding methods (i.e., only baby food, EB, integrated/combined breastfeeding) and (2) breastfeeding duration, chi-square tests were performed. No statistically significant differences were found among the instructional groups in relation to breastfeeding methods: χ2 (4, N = 274) = 4.28, p > 0.05, rc = 0.09. In addition, no statistically significant differences were found among the instructional groups in relation to breastfeeding duration: χ2 (10, N = 274) = 7.90, p > 0.05, rc = 0.12.
In order to test hypothesis H7, the assessment of the association between employment status (unemployed/part- or full-time salaried employee/self-employed) and (1) the three different breastfeeding methods (i.e., only baby food, EB, integrated/combined breastfeeding), chi-square tests were performed. No statistically significant differences were found among the different breastfeeding methods: χ2 (4, N = 274) = 17.08, p < 0.01, rc = 0.18. The results indicate that (1) those who were unemployed preferred EB; (2) those who were self-employed preferred to opt for baby food only or combined breastfeeding; and (3) salaried employees preferred combined breastfeeding. However, in testing whether these results changed under different employment/job percentage (0% or unemployed/part-time as 25%/50%/75%/full-time with 100% employment), it was discovered that the results (previous paragraph) did not change at all based on the job scope, and stayed relatively similar across all the work percentage groups, respectively: (1) χ2 = 4.57, p > 0.05, for the unemployed group; (2) χ2 = 4.02, p > 0.05, for the 25% part-timers; (3) χ2 = 0.49, p > 0.05, for the 50% part-timers; (4) χ2 = 6.35, p > 0.05, for the 75% part-timers; and (5) χ2 = 1.96, p > 0.05, for the full-timers.
Lastly, in order to test hypothesis H8, the assessment of the differences between educational levels (non-academic/academic) on (1) the reasons encouraging the mothers to breastfeed their infant and (2) the reasons leading them to stop breastfeeding, descriptive statistics, independent-samples t-tests, and chi-square tests were performed. Notably, the nine reasons fostering the mothers to breastfeed their infant were rated on a 3-point Likert-type scale (0 = did not influence my decision to breastfeed my baby; 1 = somewhat influenced my decision; 2 = influenced my decision a great deal). Moreover, the six reasons leading to a halt in breastfeeding were calculated on a dichotomous scale (0 = was not a reason to stop breastfeeding; 1 = was a reason to stop breastfeeding). The 3-point Likert scale was chosen for its simplicity and clarity, and to minimize participant confusion and response fatigue, thus enabling the clear categorization of levels of influence,
Depicted in
Figure 1 are the reasons, in descending order, based on the mean scores, favoring breastfeeding. As can be seen, the two most prominent participant-reported reasons favoring breastfeeding were (1) wanting to maintain the baby’s health (M = 1.87) and (2) wanting to develop a more intimate relationship/attachment with the baby (M = 1.84).
Portrayed in
Figure 2 are the participant-reported reasons leading to a halt in breastfeeding in a descending order based on relative frequencies. “Reported reasons” was used to describe the participants’ self-identified reasons for ceasing breastfeeding, as collected through the survey instrument. This phrasing reflects the subjective nature of the responses provided by the participants. As can be seen, the most prominent reported reason for halting breastfeeding was the quality of the milk/the amount of milk produced by the mother herself (50.7%).
Independent sample
t-tests revealed several significant differences between academics and non-academics in terms of fostering breastfeeding. The results are presented in
Table 8. As can be learned from the statistically significant effects, (1) non-academics were more influenced by their family members to breastfeed than academics, (2) academics were more influenced by instructional training programs than non-academics, (3) non-academics were more influenced by successful previous breastfeeding than academics, (4) non-academics were more influenced by financial constraints (i.e., EB does not require ‘special’ funds) than academics, and (5) academics tended to be more influenced by information obtained from the literature, internet, or media.
The chi-square tests indicated several significant associations (between educational level and reasons leading to a halt in breastfeeding). The chi-square test was found to be significant (χ
2 = 6.21,
p = 0.013). The results of the table show that 59.6% of the non-academics and 55.6% of the academics, indicated that the quality of the milk/the amount of milk produced by the mother herself was found to be a factor that influenced the decision to stop breastfeeding. (2) The chi-square test was found to be significant (χ
2 = 11.75,
p = 0.001). The results of the table show that 59.6% of the non-academics and 78.8% of the academics did not stop breastfeeding for the reason mentioned - the baby’s health issues. (3) No significant association was found with regard to the health issues of the mother as a reason between educational groups (χ
2 = 1.06,
p = 0.303). (4) The chi-square test was found to be significant (χ
2 = 4.26,
p = 0.039). The results of the table show that 84.2% of the non- academics and 73.8% of the academics did not stop breastfeeding for the reason mentioned—fatigue/inconvenience and lack of time or dissatisfaction from the breastfeeding experience. (5) No significant association was found with regard to the lack of support from professionals to continue breastfeeding as a reason between educational groups (χ
2 = 2.19,
p = 0.139). (6) The chi-square test was found to be significant (χ
2 = 3.59,
p = 0.051). The results of the table show that 80.7% of the non-academics and 70.6% of the academics did not stop breastfeeding for the reason mentioned—return to work and unsupportive conditions for breastfeeding an infant (
Table 9).