1. Introduction
According to the World Health Organization (WHO), cesarean section (CS) rates have been steadily increasing in low-, middle-, and high-income countries above levels that cannot be considered medically necessary [
1]. CS may have short-term and long-term effects on the mother. Commonly reported short-term effects are postpartum hemorrhage, surgical site infection, puerperal fever, wound dehiscence, respiratory tract infection, anemia, reactions to anesthesia, blood clots, surgical injury, anxiety, and depression. Increased risk of placenta previa, placenta accreta, and placental abruption in subsequent pregnancies, increased risk of miscarriage, uterine rupture risk, pelvic floor dysfunction, chronic pain, and adhesions are commonly reported long-term effects. Compared with women who had a vaginal birth, women after a CS were more likely to report extreme tiredness and back pain. Breastfeeding problems, pain-related worsened sleep quality and comfort, delayed recovery, and prolonged hospitalization are also mentioned [
2,
3,
4,
5].
Cesarean section is associated with a high prevalence of pain conditions, such as postsurgical pain, pain onsetting during pregnancy and continuing postpartum, pain onset related to postpartum musculoskeletal changes and lifestyle changes (including newborn care), as well as anxiety and/or fatigue. Low back pain, pelvic girdle pain, de Quervain’s tenosynovitis, carpal tunnel syndrome, meralgia paresthetica, plantar fasciitis, and thoracic outlet syndrome are pain conditions reported in pregnancy. Most of these can also persist or occur in the postpartum period [
6]. Postoperative pain is a complex physiological response to tissue injury accompanying surgical manipulation. It has the character of acute somatic and/or visceral pain arising due to tissue trauma (interruption of superficial tissues—skin, subcutaneous tissue, fascia, and muscles—and deeper structures/organs such as the peritoneum and uterus) and stretching of visceral structures. The postoperative pain after CS is severe, but it is self-limiting in nature. Postoperative pain resolves in two phases, with an initial exponential decline followed by a linear pattern [
7,
8,
9]. The duration of postpartum pain has not been established yet and ranges from two to even up to six months [
8,
10]. The recovery process is reported to be individually variable, ranging from very fast resolution of pain (6 days) to much slower courses (>40 days) [
7]. Pain that persists beyond the healing process is referred to as persistent pain. The precise definition of persistent postpartum pain (PPP) has not been developed yet. It is assumed that PPP lasts at least six weeks after childbirth. PPP following CS may be considered chronic postsurgical pain, which is defined as follows: (1) pain developing or increasing in intensity after CS, (2) pain persisting beyond the healing process (at least 3 months after the initiating event), (3) pain interfering with the quality of life, (4) pain located in the area of injury, projected to the territory of a nerve situated in this area, or referred to a dermatome [
10,
11].
When estimating the prevalence of persistent postoperative pain, pre-existing pain conditions should be excluded. It is difficult to separate pregnancy and postpartum pain conditions; hence, adequate assessment of postoperative persistent pain and PPP prevalence remains a challenge for researchers. For the purposes of the study, a definition of PPP was adopted based on the definition of postoperative pain excluding only the point relating to the pain localization (pain beyond the area of surgery trauma was also included as women were often reporting other types of pain onset connected to CS). The following pain was considered PPP:
- -
Localization: any pain, not only in the surgical field or projected to deep somatic or visceral tissues (musculoskeletal pain included);
- -
Duration: persisting for at least three months after surgery;
- -
Lowering the quality of life;
- -
Not present before CS.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term postpartum pain experience in the group of women undergoing elective cesarean section. An electronic patient-reported outcome tool (ePRO) was used to assess patients’ perception of their own health, including aspects like daily functioning, as well as to determine the presence and severity of pain.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Participants
The participants were women after elective transperitoneal cesarean section with transverse skin incision. In order to minimize disruptive factors, such as the course of labor before CS or urgent medical conditions, for example, placental abruption, that may interfere with pain perception, emergency CSs were excluded.
2.2. Procedures
It was a retrospective cross-sectional study approved by the Jan Kochanowski University’s Bioethics Committee (12/2021). The study was conducted in the form of an online survey addressed to women who had undergone a CS. Information about the possibility of participation was posted on the official Facebook page of the Provincial Combined Hospital in Kielce, implementing the project. The website post contained a description of the purpose of the study, the conditions of participation, and a link redirecting to the survey platform. Participation in the study was voluntary and anonymous. After accessing the questionnaire, participants had to read the information about the project and give their informed consent to participate. In addition, the authors supported recruitment by sharing information about the study via social media, which broadened the reach of the message. Only women living in Poland were asked to participate in the study, as the survey was in Polish. Due to the recruitment online and the lack of a requirement to provide an exact location, it was not possible to determine precisely which regions of the country the respondents came from. The time taken to complete the questionnaire was approximately 20 min. In the case of a repeated CS, the answers should have referred to the last surgery. All answers were mandatory (without answering a question, it was not possible to move on to the next one), which prevented data loss.
The data analysis consisted of two stages: Stage I—analysis of the entire study group (the course and nature of pain during pregnancy, the severity of postoperative pain, and the course of recovery in all participants were assessed). The aim of this stage was to describe the full pain profile in the population of women after CS. Stage II was focused on identification of a subgroup meeting the criteria for PPP. In this subgroup, the relationships between PPP and pain during pregnancy, postoperative pain, and the course of recovery were examined.
2.3. Measures
The main outcomes constituted the experience of pain during pregnancy, after CS (postoperative pain), and in the postpartum period (persistent postpartum pain). The severity, duration, localization, and characteristics of pain were analyzed. The presence of pain was defined by a Numeric Rating Scale score > 0. A 4, 7 cut-off point scheme was used [
12]. This theory presumes that mild pain is scored 4 or lower and moderate to severe pain 5 or higher. After preliminary assessment of pain during pregnancy, postoperative pain, and recovery (Stage I), a group of patients meeting the PPP criteria was included in the next stage of analysis (Stage II).
Participants were asked questions regarding their
- -
Reproductive and pregnancy background;
- -
Hospitalization (level of referral system, length of hospitalization);
- -
CS-related information (type of anesthesia, type of sutures, drainage);
- -
Newborn-related information (early skin-to-skin contact—contact during the first hour of a newborn’s life with the mother or father, newborn feeding method);
- -
Pregnancy, convalescence, and postpartum pain experience (pain during movement/activity was assessed, severity—using a Numeric Rating Scale, duration—in weeks, localization, characteristics);
- -
Pain-increasing and decreasing activities;
- -
Current health status (self-rated health, continuous numeric variable with a range of 0–100);
- -
Impact of pain on daily activities, physical activity, sleep, sexual intercourse, and childcare (self-rated, qualitative variables: no impact, little, moderate, and significant impact, prevents performance);
- -
Physiotherapy during pregnancy and in the postpartum period.
2.4. Statistical Analysis
The mean, standard deviation, median, quartiles, and range of quantitative variables were shown. For qualitative variables, absolute and relative frequencies (n and %) were reported. The chi-squared test (with Yates correction for 2 × 2 tables) or Fisher’s exact test (in case of low expected values) were used for comparisons of qualitative variables between groups. The Mann–Whitney U test was used for comparisons of quantitative variables between two groups, while the Kruskal–Wallis test (followed by the post hoc Dunn test) was used for three or more groups. Spearman’s correlation coefficient was used to assess correlation between two quantitative variables. Multiple linear regression was employed to model the potential impact of predictors on a quantitative variable. The regression parameters, alongside the 95% confidence intervals, were presented. Univariate and multiple logistic regression was employed to model the potential impact of predictors on a dichotomous variable. ORs (odds ratios), alongside the 95% confidence intervals, were presented. The significance level was set to 0.05. All the analyses were conducted in R software, version 4.5.0.
4. Discussion
Although demographic and socio-economic factors are mainly cited as the causes of low fertility, many countries are implementing programs aimed at improving the quality of pre-, intra-, and postnatal care in order to reverse this trend. The issue of acute pain assessment and management is an important part of these programs. The problem of persistent postpartum pain and quality of postpartum life are also analyzed. The reported incidence of PPP varies, depending on the study population, study design, and criteria used; hence, the results of studies are inconsistent [
9,
13]. The context of persistent pain after CS remains a very specific condition. As with any surgical procedure, the degree of pain experienced by the patient is influenced by the location of the procedure (transperitoneal vs. extraperitoneal CS), its extent, the degree of tissue trauma, and psychogenic factors: anxiety and fear of experiencing pain [
8,
9,
13]. In terms of severity, pain after a CS ranks 9th out of 179 different surgical procedures [
14]. The probability of persistent postoperative pain in the adult population is approximately 20% [
13]. Women are more likely to experience severe, persistent pain after surgery [
5,
8]. Data on the incidence of PPP after CS, compared to chronic pain in women after abdominal and gynecological surgery, are inconsistent. Studies showing a similar incidence emphasize the common mechanism underlying this phenomenon [
15]. In the case of lower rates of persistent pain after CS, shorter operation times, less peripheral nerve damage, high rates of spinal anesthesia, and the protective role of oxytocin, estrogen, and progesterone are discussed [
5,
9].
After CS the scar pain/wound-site pain and visceral pain (deep intra-abdominal pain, pelvic pain) may co-exist with non-wound pain: low back pain, pain in the genito-pelvic region, or musculoskeletal pain occurring after surgery. For the purpose of our own study, PPP was defined as pain of any cause (not only related to surgery) persisting for at least three months after CS. Similar assumptions were made by Daly et al. [
16] and Jin et al. [
17]. In the present study, the incidence of PPP was considered high (32.37%), assuming that the likelihood of developing persistent postsurgical pain is approximately 20% or even lower than 10% [
8,
13,
15]. In a British study incidence of new pain at four months was 35.7% and 41.8% in the group that reported preoperative pain [
16]. Similar results were obtained in a Japanese study (30.7%) [
18]. Niklasson et al. [
19] found PPP at 3, 6, and 12 months in 40.27 and 22% of patients, respectively, and Borges et al. [
20] in 25.5% of patients at 3 months after CS. In turn, in a Chinese study, the incidence of PPP at the same intervals at 3, 6, and 12 months after CS was 18.3%, 11.3%, and 6.8%, respectively [
17]. According to Kainu et al. [
21], the incidence of PPP at 1 year after CS was greater (22%) than after vaginal delivery (8%). The wide variability in the reported incidence of PPP is observed. The trajectory to baseline recovery pain has not been established and ranges from two to six months, but the overall trend in the incidence of PPP is reduced after 6 months [
8,
15,
21]. The pooled incidence of chronic postsurgical pain, according to Wang et al. [
22], was 15.2% at 3 months, 9.5% at 6 months, and 5.0% at 12 months after CS, with lower incidence in low- and middle-income countries than in high-income countries.
Pain is impacting multiple domains of quality of life in more than half of women after CS [
23]. We found that PPP was usually mild in nature and had little to moderate impact on function. The onset of pain after CS adversely affected daily activities, physical activity, sexual intercourse, sleep, and childcare in 84.69%, 77.30%, 61.74%, 48.47%, and 38.26% of women in the study group. In the Polish study, problems with usual activities (60%), mobility (over 50%), and self-care (33%) were similarly frequent [
24]. Most women with PPP reported mild pain (NRS 1–4), which is confirmed by Jin et al. [
17]. Moderate pain (NRS 4–6) predominated in the Swedish study [
19]. Borges et al. [
20] reported that the most intense persistent pain was rated by 16.1%, 47.5%, and 36.4% of respondents as mild, moderate, and severe pain, respectively, while the mean pain intensity was 5.7 (2.3 SD) on an NRS scale. In the present study, mean PPP intensity was lower (3.44/1.83 SD).
When analyzing the issue of persistent pain after cesarean section, the terms wound pain and non-wound pain are used [
15]. Overall estimated incidence of wound pain at 3 to less than 6 months after CS is 15.4%, and at 12 months after CS it is 11.5% [
15]. In our own study, the postoperative scar was indicated as the location of pain in almost every second woman (44.13%). Similar results were obtained by Jin et al. [
17]. Niklasson et al. [
19] reported that 56% of all responders with pain reported it in and around the surgical site. The Pfannenstiel incision frequently used for CS is associated with a risk of neuropathic pain as a result of ilioinguinal and iliohypogastric nerve entrapment [
5]. The neuropathic component was found in every fourth woman with chronic scar pain [
25]. In our own study, the stabbing and burning pain was reported by 151/392 (38.52%) and 60/392 (15.31%) women with PPP.
Among non-wound pain, pelvic and back pain are the most common, sometimes referred to as lumbopelvic pain. According to Weibel et al. [
15], the pooled incidence rates of chronic back pain at 3 to less than 6 months after CS was 29.8%, at least 12 months after CS was 17.5%, and chronic pelvic pain equaled 19.4% and 22.1%, respectively. Similar results were obtained by Niklasson et al. [
19]. In turn, a Canadian study found its presence in 21% of women 6 months after CS [
26]. The incidence of chronic back pain revealed in our own study was higher than the rate of postoperative wound or pelvic pain. It was reported by every second woman. The risk factors for persistent postpartum back pain are a history of low back pain, a pre-pregnancy body mass index > 25, pelvic girdle pain in pregnancy, depression in pregnancy, a heavy workload in pregnancy [
27], and a heavier baby’s weight, but not spinal anesthesia [
28] or higher NRS scores before pregnancy or at multiple pain sites [
29].
In our own study, a history of pain during pregnancy, previous surgery, and severe acute postoperative pain soon after CS were significant risk factors for PPP. This relationship between poorly controlled acute pain after CS and persistent pain is well described [
5,
10,
16,
17,
19,
20]. It is the most commonly identified factor associated with PPP [
30]. In addition to these, the age, weight of the woman, psychological factors (anxiety, depression), type of anesthesia, and factors related to surgery or tissue injury have so far been associated with the development of chronic pain after CS [
9,
20,
30].
Limitations
The retrospective and self-reported nature of the data introduces potential recall bias and selection bias. Respondents may not remember the intensity or duration of pain accurately. Subjective assessment of pain after months may be distorted by emotions, current health status, or the passage of time. The use of electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) questionnaires has methodological limitations. One of the main problems is the risk of selection bias resulting from unequal access to digital technologies among respondents, which may limit the representativeness of the sample. Respondents with chronic pain may be more likely to participate in the study, which may distort the results. The lack of direct contact with the researcher makes it difficult to clarify any doubts regarding the questions, which may lead to imprecise or ambiguous answers. The study did not take into account psychosocial determinants such as anxiety, depression, or catastrophizing.