Next Article in Journal
Caring While Moving: Case Studies on Physical Activity and Dementia Caregiver Well-Being
Previous Article in Journal
Telemedicine-Supported Intervention Versus Standard Care for Managing Cardiovascular Risk Factors in a Socially Deprived Urban Population: A Prospective Study
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Systematic Review of School-Based Behavioral Interventions and the Symbolic Labor of Inclusion for Children with Chronic Illness
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Systematic Review

Quality of Life and Fatigue in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review

1
Department of Internal Medicine, Ibn Al Nafees Hospital, Road 3302, Manama P.O. Box 54533, Bahrain
2
Internal Medicine Department, Salmaniya Medical Complex, Manama 317, Bahrain
3
Department of Internal Medicine, The University of Toledo Medical Center, Toledo, OH 43614, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Healthcare 2025, 13(17), 2203; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13172203
Submission received: 9 May 2025 / Revised: 28 August 2025 / Accepted: 31 August 2025 / Published: 3 September 2025

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this paper is to assess the quality of life and fatigue among adult patients diagnosed with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) compared to healthy controls. Methods: We conducted searches in Medline and Embase from January 2015 to April 2025. We included publications that examined adult patients with IBD without comorbidities, compared them to healthy controls, and assessed quality of life and fatigue. Two reviewers independently conducted study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment. We described results narratively due to high heterogeneity. Results: Ten studies with a pool of 10,661 participants were selected. Three studies showed significantly worsened mental and physical components for quality of life in IBD patients compared to healthy controls. Additionally, three studies reported that fatigue was more prevalent among patients with IBD than in healthy controls. Conclusions: Our review suggests that quality of life is significantly reduced, and fatigue is more prevalent in IBD patients compared to healthy controls. Further long-term follow-up studies are needed to provide a more comprehensive understanding of the global impact of IBD, particularly in non-Western populations.

1. Introduction

Patients’ health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is significantly impacted by inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) [1]. Fatigue, rectal blood loss, and abdominal pain are all primary symptoms of IBD. Even among patients with quiescent disease, 40% report experiencing fatigue [2]. IBD patients may endure embarrassing and painful symptoms, a chronic and unpredictable disease course, and anxiety about various life-related complications, including fatigue, social isolation, bowel control, and concerns about developing cancer or requiring surgery [3]. Prior to recent advancements in clinical trial designs and regulations emphasizing patient-reported outcomes as primary endpoints, HRQoL and related psychosocial measures were rarely investigated in clinical trials. However, these measures are now gaining importance [4].
Individuals with chronic illnesses such as IBD report experiencing fatigue in a distinct and more intense manner than healthy individuals [5]. Most prevalence studies on IBD have originated from Western countries [6], and in-depth analyses of the disease burden in Asia remain in their early stages. The physiological pathways and mechanism of fatigue in IBD remain poorly understood [7].
This fatigue is typically at least two times more severe than healthy controls and has a detrimental impact on QoL [8,9]. Despite this, research on fatigue in IBD remains limited [10].
Additionally, research on QoL and fatigue in IBD patients with varying levels of disease activity remains scarce, with several controversial aspects still unresolved. Hence, in this study, we assess health-related QoL and fatigue in IBD patients.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Objective

This systematic review aims to determine the quality of life (QoL) and fatigue among adult patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) compared to healthy controls.
This systematic review was conducted and reported following the PRISMA statement guidelines [11]. This study was registered with PROSPERO, registration number CRD420251072983.

2.2. Search Strategy

We developed search strategies by combining terms related to inflammatory bowel disease and quality of life. A well-conducted systematic review was conducted, and searches were updated until 2015; hence, we used that year as a cut-off to conduct our searches [12]. Searches were conducted in both Medline and Embase databases, limited to the English language and the period from 1 January 2015 to 15 April 2025. Full search strategies are reported in Supplementary Materials. The retrieved search results were exported into Endnote for duplicate removal.

2.3. Eligibility Criteria

To be included, studies met the following criteria:

2.3.1. Inclusion Criteria

  • Studies must have investigated IBD (including ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease) with established diagnostic parameters;
  • Studies must have graded quality of life using any validated instrument;
  • Studies must have assessed fatigue using any validated instrument;
  • Studies must involve an adult study population;
  • Studies must have compared quality of life in people diagnosed with IBD with a normal population;
  • Studies must have designed and included randomized controlled trials, cross-sectional, retrospective, prospective, and other controlled studies.

2.3.2. Exclusion Criteria

  • Studies investigating non-fatigue comorbidities;
  • Conference abstracts, posters, commentaries, and letters;
  • Case reports, case series, or qualitative research;
  • Animal studies.

2.4. Study Selection

Two independent reviewers screened the abstract and title for all selected articles. Disagreements on screening and selection were solved by considering opinions from a third independent reviewer. Using the predefined selection criteria, full-text articles were retrieved for all selected studies. Disagreements at this stage were also solved with the expert opinion of a third independent reviewer. The Rayyan tool was used for the study selection process [13].

2.5. Data Extraction

Data about the following variables were extracted:
  • Authors, publication year, study design, and setting;
  • Participant characteristics, including IBD subtype, sex, disease activity status, and sample size;
  • Outcome measures and results for the primary outcomes.
Two independent reviewers conducted data extraction and documentation using a standardized data collection form.

2.6. Quality Assessment Studies

The quality of all selected studies was assessed by two reviewers. Disagreements were resolved by considering the expert opinion of a third independent reviewer. Cohort studies were appraised using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS) [14]. Cross-sectional studies were evaluated using an adapted NOS.

2.7. Data Synthesis

A narrative synthesis was provided for all included studies. We planned to conduct random-effects meta-analyses with the DerSimonian and Laird method [15]; however, they were not conducted because of heterogeneity.

3. Results

In total, 5486 studies were considered through database searches. After excluding duplicate studies (n = 2433), 3053 unique articles were screened and selected based on titles and abstracts. Post-screening assessment excluded another 3013 articles irrelevant to the objective of this study.
  • 40 studies underwent full-text assessment;
  • Of all 40, only 10 studies were included in the final analysis for meeting the inclusion parameters.

3.1. Study Characteristics

Figure 1 represents flow of study selection and characteristics of included studies reported in Table 1.
  • A total of 10,661 participants were included.
  • Study designs:
    Cross-sectional studies (n = 4);
    Cohort studies (n = 6).
  • Study settings:
    Hospital-based studies (n = 6);
    Community-based studies (n = 3).
  • Median follow-up duration: 4.89 years (range: 0.12–8.66 years);
  • Gender distribution: 54% male, 46% female;
  • The quality of every study included was graded from good to fair quality (Tables S1 and S2);
  • Cross-sectional studies included fewer than 400 participants, while all other studies received high scores for selection, comparability, and outcome assessment.

3.2. Quality of Life

Six studies assessed QoL among IBD participants compared to healthy controls [16,17,18,21,22,23]. Of these, four studies employed the SF-36 questionnaire, one study used SF-12, and another used QLQ-CR29 [21]. Three studies that used SF-36 and assessed both the mental and physical components of QoL, which reported significantly lower scores for IBD patients than control groups. Other studies reported that QoL was significantly impacted in IBD participants. Another study used the Portuguese version of the Short Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (SIBDQ) for measuring the HRQoL [24]. Among the remaining two studies, one study used the SF-12 questionnaire, which indicated that compared to healthy controls, QoL’s physical and mental components were significantly lower in IBD patients. Another study used QLQ-CR29, which also demonstrated poor QoL in IBD patients compared to healthy controls. Comparison of mean SIBDQ scores were higher in patients with non-CD than with CD (56.8 ± 9.6 vs. 53.2 ± 32.0; p = 0.034) [24].

3.3. Fatigue

Only three studies reported data on fatigue outcomes [5,19,20]; however, due to heterogeneity, we did not conduct a meta-analysis. Of these three studies, two used the Fatigue Severity Scale and one study used the Generic Fatigue Questionnaire. Schreiner et al.’s 2021 study [5] found that more than half of the IBD patients (672/1208) reported significant fatigue compared to healthy controls (145/414) (OR 2.71; 95% CI 2.08–3.54; p < 0.001). In addition, IBD also affected daily activities. Holten et al.’s 2023 [20] study also found that two-thirds of patients newly diagnosed with IBD had experienced fatigue. In addition, Grimstad et al.’s 2021 [19] study reported that IBD patients who had undergone conventional treatment also reported fatigue more than healthy controls.

4. Discussion

Our systematic review indicates a primary finding: compared to healthy populations, the physical and mental components of life quality are significantly lower in IBD patients. Both components were found to be lower in all adult IBD patients. Additionally, fatigue was also significantly more prevalent in IBD patients.
Our findings align with previous research findings [12]. In both interventional and observational studies, QoL is considered a significant indicator of clinical outcomes in the management of IBD [12]. This study primarily provides a broad comparison of QoL between adult IBD patients and healthy controls while also investigating the impact of IBD on fatigue prevalence and HRQoL.
Our findings support previous research demonstrating the extensive and multifaceted impact of IBD on individuals’ lives. Research consistently shows that IBD significantly lowers HRQoL across social, psychological, and physical domains. According to Lonnfors et al. [1], IBD patients frequently experience persistent symptoms such as diarrhea, rectal bleeding, and abdominal pain, which negatively impact their day-to-day activities and social relationships.
These symptoms further reduce QoL by leading to frequent hospital visits and prolonged hospital stays. Romberg-Camps et al. [25] showed a strong correlation between psychological distress and lower HRQoL, indicating a high prevalence of depression and anxiety in IBD. Moreover, several studies, including Minderhoud et al. [8], have shown that fatigue is a common and severe symptom of IBD, affecting nearly 40% of patients even during remission.
Our results align with those of Chavarría et al. [26], who found that fatigue significantly lowers QoL, with a high severity in IBD patients compared to healthy individuals. This observation suggests that fatigue is not merely an outcome of an active disease state but rather a core component of the disease burden.
IBD fatigue is multifactorial, involving both psychological and physiological factors. According to Borren et al. [7], fatigue may persist even in quiescent disease due to underlying mechanisms such as chronic low-grade inflammation. The fact that fatigue is multifaceted emphasizes the need for a comprehensive management strategy.
A holistic strategy that incorporates lifestyle changes, such as regular exercise and stress-reduction methods, has been shown to be beneficial, as noted by Artom et al. [27]. For IBD patients, taking care of these issues can greatly enhance their QoL.
Our findings show that most studies on IBD and its effects were conducted in Western countries. Burisch et al. [28] and Zhao et al. [29] have highlighted a significant research gap in understanding the disease burden and patient experiences in non-Western populations. Expanding research to diverse geographic and cultural contexts significantly improves the global understanding of IBD, bridging the gap between research and clinical practice.
A few limitations in our findings should be acknowledged. In terms of study design, we selected three cross-sectional studies, limiting the ability to determine causal relationships. Regarding the heterogeneity in measurement tools, different studies used varied QoL and fatigue measurement instruments, making direct comparisons challenging. In addition, we did not conduct a reporting bias assessment due to no meta-analysis being conducted.
Future research should prioritize longitudinal studies, as they better show correlations among fatigue, QoL, and disease progression. Additionally, including more multinational studies may better explore the global symptomatic burden of IBD across diverse populations.

5. Conclusions

Our systematic review demonstrates that clinical indications of a worsened quality of life (QoL) are significantly prominent in IBD patients compared to healthy individuals, affecting both mental and physical health domains. Even in clinical remission, fatigue—a prevalent symptom in IBD—persists. This observation suggests that fatigue is not solely a consequence of active disease but a core element of the disease burden, requiring better recognition and management.
Given the rising global incidence of IBD, future research should focus on longitudinal, multinational studies to explore sociocultural variations, disease burden, and patient experiences in non-Western populations. Standardizing QoL and fatigue measurement tools will improve comparability and facilitate meta-analyses across studies.
To optimize patient care, healthcare providers should consider a holistic, patient-centric approach, ensuring that both physical and psychological health are addressed. Further global research is needed to bridge knowledge gaps and develop comprehensive, multidisciplinary management strategies for IBD patients worldwide.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/healthcare13172203/s1, Table S1: Newcastle–Ottawa Scale quality assessment of the included studies (details). Cohort Star Template; Table S2: Newcastle–Ottawa Scale quality assessment of the included studies (details). Cross-sectional studies Star Template.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.A. and J.A.; data curation, N.M. and M.A.; formal analysis, N.M.; funding acquisition, M.A.; investigation, M.A. and J.A.; methodology, M.A. and J.A.; project administration, M.A.; resources, M.A.; software, N.M.; supervision, J.A.; validation, M.A.; visualization, J.A. and M.A.; writing—original draft preparation, M.A. writing—review and editing, J.A. and B.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All the data and materials related to this article are available in this manuscript. Any additional data can be made available from the corresponding author on appropriate request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
HRQoLMultidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
IBDinflammatory bowel diseases
QoLquality of life
MDsmean differences
SIBDQShort Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire
CDChron’s disease

References

  1. Lönnfors, S.; Vermeire, S.; Avedano, L. IBD and health-related quality of life—Discovering the true impact. J. Crohn’s Colitis 2014, 8, 1281–1286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. D’Silva, A.; Fox, D.E.; Nasser, Y.; Vallance, J.K.; Quinn, R.R.; Ronksley, P.E.; Raman, M. Prevalence and risk factors for fatigue in adults with inflammatory bowel disease: A systematic review with meta-analysis. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2022, 20, 995–1009.e7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Popov, J.; Farbod, Y.; Chauhan, U.; Kalantar, M.; Hill, L.; Armstrong, D.; Halder, S.; Marshall, J.K.; Moayyedi, P.; Kaasalainen, S. Patients’ Experiences and Challenges in Living with Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Qualitative Approach. Clin. Exp. Gastroenterol. 2021, 14, 123–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Rubin, D.T.; Peyrin-Biroulet, L.; Reinisch, W.; Tole, S.; Sullivan, L.; Park, K.T.; Regueiro, M. Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients’ Perspectives of Clinical Trials: A Global Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis. Crohns Colitis 360 2021, 3, otab079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Schreiner, P.; Rossel, J.B.; Biedermann, L.; Valko, P.O.; Baumann, C.R.; Greuter, T.; Scharl, M.; Vavricka, S.R.; Pittet, V.; Juillerat, P.; et al. Fatigue in inflammatory bowel disease and its impact on daily activities. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 2021, 53, 138–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Maddineni, G.; AAkash, F.N.U.; Rehman, O.; Salami, A. Global burden of ibd: A comparative analysis of the two most affected regions (1990–2021). Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2025, 31 (Suppl. S1), S30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Borren, N.Z.; van der Woude, C.J.; Ananthakrishnan, A.N. Fatigue in IBD: Epidemiology, pathophysiology and management. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2019, 16, 247–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Minderhoud, I.M.; Oldenburg, B.; Van Dam, P.S.; van Berge Henegouwen, G.P. High prevalence of fatigue in quiescent inflammatory bowel disease is not related to adrenocortical insufficiency. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2003, 98, 1088–1093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Jelsness-Jørgensen, L.-P.; Bernklev, T.; Henriksen, M.; Torp, R.; Moum, B.A. Chronic fatigue is more prevalent in patients with inflammatory bowel disease than in healthy controls. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2011, 17, 1564–1572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Van Langenberg, D.; Gibson, P.R. Systematic review: Fatigue in inflammatory bowel disease. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 2010, 32, 131–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Page, M.J.; McKenzie, J.E.; Bossuyt, P.M.; Boutron, I.; Hoffmann, T.C.; Mulrow, C.D.; Shamseer, L.; Tetzlaff, J.M.; Akl, E.A.; Brennan, S.E.; et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021, 372, 71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Knowles, S.R.; Graff, L.A.; Wilding, H.; Hewitt, C.; Keefer, L.; Mikocka-Walus, A. Quality of life in inflammatory bowel disease: A systematic review and meta-analyses—Part I. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2018, 24, 742–751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Ouzzani, M.; Hammady, H.; Fedorowicz, Z.; Elmagarmid, A. Rayyan—A web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Syst. Rev. 2016, 5, 210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Wells, G.A.; Shea, B.; O’Connell, D.; Peterson, J.; Welch, V.; Losos, M.; Tugwell, P. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Nonrandomised Studies in Meta-Analyses. 2000. Available online: https://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp (accessed on 19 May 2025).
  15. DerSimonian, R.; Laird, N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control. Clin. Trials 1986, 7, 177–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. AlQahtani, M.; AlHarbi, R.; AlAsmari, R.; AlNowaiser, L.; AlThunayan, E.; Alzaben, A.S. Health-Related Quality of Life in Individuals with Crohn’s Disease: A Sample from Saudi Arabia. J. Allied Health 2022, 51, 104–109. [Google Scholar]
  17. Bulut, E.A.; Törüner, M. The influence of disease type and activity to sexual life and health quality in inflammatory bowel disease. Turk. J. Gastroenterol. 2018, 30, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Bogut, A.; Martinac, M.; Pravdić, D.; Karin, M.; Volarić, M.; Bevanda Glibo, D.; Babić, E.; Babić, D.; Bevanda, M. Personality Traits and Health Related Quality of Life in Patients with Irritable Bowel Sindrome and Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Psychiatr. Danub. 2022, 34 (Suppl. S10), 53–62. [Google Scholar]
  19. Grimstad, T.; Skjellerudsveen, B.M.; Kvaløy, J.T.; Skoie, I.M.; Carlsen, A.; Karlsen, L.N.; Aabakken, L.; Omdal, R. The influence of disease activity on fatigue in patients with ulcerative colitis–a longitudinal study. Scand. J. Gastroenterol. 2022, 57, 290–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Holten, K.I.A.; Bernklev, T.; Opheim, R.; Johansen, I.; Olsen, B.C.; Lund, C.; Strande, V.; Medhus, A.W.; Perminow, G.; Bengtson, M.-B.; et al. Fatigue in patients with newly diagnosed inflammatory bowel disease: Results from a prospective inception cohort, the IBSEN III study. J. Crohn’s Colitis 2023, 17, 1781–1790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kunovský, L.; Mitáš, L.; Marek, F.; Dolina, J.; Poredska, K.; Kučerová, L.; Benesova, K.; Kala, Z. Impact of surgery on quality of life in Crohn s disease patients: Final results of Czech cohort. Vnitřní Lékařství 2018, 64, 347–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ling, F.; Tu, L.; Li, J.; Chen, Y.; Xu, M.; Zhu, L. Psychological aspect of patients with inflammatory bowel disease, which may be related to the quality of life, sleep and disease characteristics. Scand. J. Gastroenterol. 2021, 56, 1328–1336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Trieschmann, K.; Chang, L.; Park, S.; Naliboff, B.; Joshi, S.; Labus, J.S.; Sauk, J.S.; Limketkai, B.N.; Mayer, E.A. The visceral sensitivity index: A novel tool for measuring GI-symptom-specific anxiety in inflammatory bowel disease. Neurogastroenterol. Motil. 2022, 34, e14384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Oliveira, R.; Martins, V.; de Sousa, H.T.; Roseira, J. Food-Related Quality of Life and Its Predictors in Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Dig. Dis. Sci. 2024, 69, 1793–1802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Romberg-Camps, M.; Bol, Y.; Dagnelie, P.; Hesselink-Van De Kruijs, M.; Kester, A.; Engels, L.; van Deursen, C.; Hameeteman, W.H.A.; Pierik, M.; Wolters, F.; et al. Fatigue and health-related quality of life in inflammatory bowel disease: Results from a population-based study in the Netherlands: The IBD-South Limburg cohort. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2010, 16, 2137–2147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Chavarría, C.; Casanova, M.; Chaparro, M.; Barreiro-de Acosta, M.; Ezquiaga, E.; Bujanda, L.; Rivero, M.; Argüelles-Arias, F.; Martín-Arranz, M.D.; Martínez-Montiel, M.P.; et al. Prevalence and factors associated with fatigue in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: A multicentre study. J. Crohn’s Colitis 2019, 13, 996–1002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Artom, M.; Czuber-Dochan, W.; Sturt, J.; Murrells, T.; Norton, C. The contribution of clinical and psychosocial factors to fatigue in 182 patients with inflammatory bowel disease: A cross-sectional study. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 2017, 45, 403–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Burisch, J.; Jess, T.; Martinato, M.; Lakatos, P.L.; ECCO-EpiCom. The burden of inflammatory bowel disease in Europe. J. Crohn’s Colitis 2013, 7, 322–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zhao, M.; Gönczi, L.; Lakatos, P.L.; Burisch, J. The burden of inflammatory bowel disease in Europe in 2020. J. Crohn’s Colitis 2021, 15, 1573–1587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Study selection flow. *: all mentioned databases; **: after title and abstracts screening.
Figure 1. Study selection flow. *: all mentioned databases; **: after title and abstracts screening.
Healthcare 13 02203 g001
Table 1. Study characteristics.
Table 1. Study characteristics.
SNStudy Author, YearStudy DesignSettingStudy DurationParticipant Characteristics (Sample Size)% of GenderMeasures of
QoL
Measures of
Fatigue
1AlQahtani, 2022 [16]Cross-sectionalCommunity45 daysCrohn’s
disease: 109
Healthy control: 370
Crohn’s
disease M: 55%
F: 45%
Control
M: 26%
F: 74%
SF-36NR
2Bulut, 2019 [17]Cross-sectionalCommunity9 monthsIBD:122
Control:42
CD: M: 41.3%
F: 58.6%
UC: M: 54.68%
F: 45.31%
Control
M: 47.6%
F: 52.38%
SF-36NR
3Bogut, 2022 [18]Cross-sectionalHospital6 monthsIBS: 40
IBD: 40
Control: 40
(IBS):
M: 0%
F:40%
IBD: M: 55%;
F: 45%
Control:
M: 42.5%;
F: 57.5%
SF-36NR
4Grimstad, 2022 [19] CohortHospital5 years, 9 monthsUC: 149
Control: 22
UC: M: 54.3%;
F: 45.7%
Control
M: 45.5%;
F: 54.5%
NRFatigue Severity Scale (FSS)
5Holten, 2023 [20]CohortHospital3 yearsIBD: 983
Control: 2287
UC vs. Control
M: 49.6%;
F: 72.1%
CD vs. Control
M: 56.2%;
F: 79.2%
NRGeneric Fatigue Questionnaire [FQ]
6Kunovsky, 2018 [21]CohortHospital 6 yearsCD: 215
Control: 104
Operated:
M: 44.7%;
F: 55.3%
Non-operated:
M: 33.7%;
F: 66.3%;
Control:
M: 40.4%;
F: 59.6%
QLQ-CR29 questionnaireNR
7Ling, 2021 [22]CohortHospital 2 yearsDiseased: 112
Control: 165
IBD:
M: 67.9%;
F: 32.1%
UC:
M: 66.7%;
F: 33.3%
CD:
M: 68.5%;
F: 31.5%
Control:
M: 67.9%;
F: 32.1%
SF-36NR
8Schreiner, 2021 [5]CohortHospital 1.2 yearsIBD: 1208
Control: 414
IBD: M: 63.4%;
Control
M: 41.2%
NRVisual analogue scale and Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS)
9Trieschmann, 2022 [23]CohortCommunity advertisement8 years, 8 monthsIBD: 74
IBS: 74
Control: 74
Diseased
IBD: F: 40%
IBS: F: 40%
Control: F: 40%
SF-12NR
10Oliveira, 2024 [24]Cross-sectional case–control studyHospitalNACD: 69
UC: 170
Control: 126
CD: 63.8
UC: 53.5
Control: 46.8
Short Inflammatory Bowel Disease QuestionnaireNR
CD: Crohn’s disease; IBD: inflammatory bowel disease; NA: not applicable; UC: ulcerative colitis; IBS: inflammatory bowel syndrome; M: male; F: female; NR: not reported.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Abdulla, M.; Mohammed, N.; AlQamish, J.; Sawaf, B. Quality of Life and Fatigue in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review. Healthcare 2025, 13, 2203. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13172203

AMA Style

Abdulla M, Mohammed N, AlQamish J, Sawaf B. Quality of Life and Fatigue in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review. Healthcare. 2025; 13(17):2203. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13172203

Chicago/Turabian Style

Abdulla, Maheeba, Nafeesa Mohammed, Jehad AlQamish, and Bisher Sawaf. 2025. "Quality of Life and Fatigue in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review" Healthcare 13, no. 17: 2203. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13172203

APA Style

Abdulla, M., Mohammed, N., AlQamish, J., & Sawaf, B. (2025). Quality of Life and Fatigue in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review. Healthcare, 13(17), 2203. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13172203

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop