Abstract
This research paper focuses on the investigation of the solutions of the maximum functional equation for every where G is any group. We determine that if a group G is divisible by two and three, then every non-zero solution is necessarily strictly positive; by the work of Toborg, we can then conclude that the solutions are exactly the for an additive function . Moreover, our investigation yields reliable solutions to a functional equation on any group G, instead of being divisible by two and three. We also prove the existence of normal subgroups and of any group G that satisfy some properties, and any solution can be interpreted as a function on the abelian factor group .
Keywords:
additive function; normal subgroup; strictly positive solution; commutators; maximum functional equation MSC:
20D60; 54E35; 11T71
1. Introduction
By the maximum functional equation on the group , we mean the functional equation
where is an unknown function to be determined.
The solutions of the functional Equation (1) for real-valued functions on an abelian group G have been given by Volkmann and Simon [1]; they demonstrated that satisfies Equation (1) if and only if there is an additive function such that for any . It has been shown that the functional Equation (1) characterizes the functions of the form . Subsequently, an interesting application of their result and a new proof were obtained by Kochanek [2]. In [3], Tabor generalized the functional Equation (1) for real and complex values.
In [4], Fechner dealt with four functional inequalities, which were derived from the results of [1] concerning the functional Equation (1) and also properties of the inequalities compared with some classical functional inequalities, such as the inequality of the Jensen quasi-convexity and the inequality of subadditivity.
Moreover, by rewriting the functional Equation (1) in the form
Gilanyi et al. [5] determined the stability results of the functional Equation (2) on a square-symmetric groupoid. As a consequence, they also analyzed the stability of the functional Equation (1) on an abelian group. In addition, in [6] a Pexider version of the functional Equation (1) has been investigated. Later, their results were generalized by Badora et al. [7], who demonstrated the stability of the functional equation on a certain class of groupoids.
In [8], Jarczyck and Volkmann investigated the stability of Equation (1) on an abelian group and also presented a characterization of the functional Equation (1), which is formulated in the following theorem as follows:
Theorem 1
(see [8]). Let G be an abelian group. Then, a function satisfies Equation (1) if and only if and for all .
The most exhaustive study of the functional Equation (1) on groups has been accomplished by Volkmann [9] and Toborg [10]. Volkmann generalized the functional Equation (1) in the form of
with the additional assumption that satisfies the Kannappan condition [11], that is, for all , and showed that it characterizes the absolute value of additive functions (see the theorem below). Recently, Toborg [10] gave the characterization of such functions in terms of (3) without additional assumptions ( fulfills Kannappan condition and G is an abelian group). Their main theorem is stated as follows:
Theorem 2
(see [10] for the general case and [9] for the special case of an abelian group G). Let G be any group; then a function satisfies Equation (3) if and only if there exists an additive function such that for any .
Additionally, the characterization of the generalized functional Equation (3) and stability results can be found in [12]. In [1], Simon and Volkmann investigated the functional equation
for abelian groups. The Equations (1) and (4) have complex analogues: Let V be a complex vector space and assume that is the unit circle in , and for functions , consider the equations
for every . In [13] it has been proven that the solutions of the functional Equation (5) are given by , where is a linear functional, and by Przebieracz [14] it was proven that the non-identically vanishing solutions of Equation (6) are of the form , where is also a linear functional; and in [14], Przebieracz proved the general theorem about the superstability of Equation (6).
Baron with Volkmann [13] considered a characterization of the absolute value of complex determinants, which was similar to the results of Volkmann [15], who analyzed the real case using the functional Equation (1). Readers are encouraged to refer to [14,16] and the references cited therein to obtain useful results regarding the functional Equation (4).
The functional Equation (4) in a generalized form exhibited in equation
is the focus of this research. No additional assumptions (G is an abelian group) are required, and thus, we derive results about solutions of the functional Equation (7) that are valid for any group rather than only in the special case of an abelian group G.
Additionally, to determine the solutions of the functional Equation (7) on a group G divisible by two and three, our objective is to implement the generalized result of the functional Equation (3) provided by Toborg [10] concerning the characterization of the modulus of an additive function. We will also present the existence of a certain normal subgroup of G when a non-zero solution is unitary. Finally, we will present some results whenever the solutions of Equation (7) are strictly positive on an arbitrary group G.
2. Main Results
Throughout this article, 1 is considered to be the identity element of a group G, and G is an arbitrary group and divisible by two and three.
Lemma 1.
Let G be any group and is a strictly positive solution of the functional Equation (7). Then there is an additive function such that for all .
Proof.
Since is a strictly positive solution of the functional Equation (7), we can compute
One of the main theorems of this article is stated as follows:
Theorem 3.
Assume that each element of a group G is divisible by two and three; then a function fulfills the functional Equation (7) if and only if χ vanishes identically on a group G or there exists an additive function such that for any .
Proof.
According to Lemma 1, we only have to prove that a nonzero solution is strictly positive.
When setting in Equation (7), we have , so ; therefore, we can evaluate that either or .
Suppose ; then ; therefore, . Since implies for any , we may assume that ; then, . Thus, we attempt to show that for all . Assume that , such that ; therefore, Equation (7) yields that
By (9), if , then , so we can evaluate
Therefore, (13) is not possible when and . Hence
Then, by (13), ; therefore,
From (11), (14) and (15), we can obtain ; then, again, from (15), we have ; therefore, , so (11) implies that . Then,
so . Hence, we conclude that
We also prove that
- (i)
- implies .
- (ii)
- implies .
Suppose that and G is divisible by two; then there exists an element such that ; therefore, , so . From (16), we have , then .
Furthermore, let . Suppose on the contrary that ; then by (16), , which is a contradiction, so implies that .
Additionally, to obtain the required result, we need to prove that the solution for any . If , then from (i), we get , so by (16), we obtain that . Let ; then from (ii), we have . Utilizing (11), we obtain that ; therefore, in either case . Hence, combining both cases we get that for all .
Assume that G is divisible by two; then there exists an element such that ; then . Therefore, the nonzero solution is strictly positive. Then by Lemma 1, the proof is completed. □
The following corollary is a direct consequence of Theorem 3, so we omit the proof.
Corollary 1.
Assume that χ is a strictly positive solution of the functional Equation (7) on an arbitrary group G; then following hold:
(1) , for all .
(2) for any .
(3) For an infinitely divisible group G, for any rational number .
Example 1.
Assume that or for , then it can be perceived that each element of group G is divisible by two and three. Accordingly, by employing Theorem 3, we can obtain that for every , and therefore, a nonzero function satisfies Equation (7) if and only if there exists an additive function such that for any .
Example 2.
Let ; then each element of group G is divisible by three. Assume that if and if ; then χ satisfies Equation (7) but for .
On the other hand, let ; then each element of G is divisible by two. Let if and if ; then χ also satisfies Equation (7) but does not hold for all .
Let us consider G to be any group instead of divisible by two and three. Functional Equation (7) inspires us to investigate results about its non-zero solutions and numerous other results valid on any group G. Then we derive the following lemma that will be used a couple of times during proofs:
Lemma 2.
Let χ be a non-zero solution of the functional Equation (7) on any group G; then we can derive the following:
(1) ;
(2) ;
(3) ;
(4) χ is central; i.e., .
Proof.
(1). Since and is non-zero, so, we have .
(2). By setting , for any , from Equation (7) we can deduce that
writing instead of y in Equation (17) yields
(3). Let and write y instead of x and instead of y in (7); then (3) is the result of the following computation:
(4). By applying Lemma 2 (3) and writing instead of x, we have , which implies that . Hence, is central. □
Moreover, we prove the following theorem by utilizing Lemma 2 to characterize the solutions of the functional Equation (7), without using additional assumptions about divisibility by two and three.
Theorem 4.
Let G be any group; then a function fulfills the functional Equation (7) if and only if χ vanishes identically on a group G or there exists a normal subgroup of G such that
and
or for any and for some additive function .
Proof.
The “if” part can be easily demonstrated. To prove the converse inclusion, we assume that fulfills the functional Equation (7), and we will prove that it has one of the forms presented in the statement of the theorem. Setting in Equation (7) gives that ; then ; therefore, either or .
Setting in Equation (7) implies that ; therefore, . If , then vanishes identically on a group G. Setting in Equation (7), we can compute that , so and . Further, suppose that and there exists an element such that . We need to prove that , but on the contrary suppose that ; then from Equation (7) we obtain that
which provides that . Moreover
which is a contradiction; therefore, . Suppose again that and there exists an element such that . We will show that , but on the contrary, suppose that for some ; then Equation (7) gives that
which is a contradiction; therefore, . Hence, for every . Moreover, let . It is clear that because . Let ; then by Lemma 2 we have ; therefore, . Suppose that ; then, , so from Equation (7) we obtain that
From inequalities (20) and (21), we get , which implies that . Hence, is a subgroup of G. Let ; then by Lemma 2(3), it can be seen that for every and ; hence, is a normal subgroup of G.
Moreover, let such that ; therefore, and ; then we have . Thus, Equation (7) implies that . In either case, or , which implies that either or .
Furthermore, assume that for every ; then, by applying the main theorem of [10], there exists an additive function such that for every . □
Corollary 2.
Let χ be a non-zero solution of the functional Equation (7) on any group G; then the commutator subgroup is a normal subgroup of .
Proof.
Let be a non-zero solution of Equation (7). Then from Theorem 4, in the first case, assume that for every ; then there exists an additive function such that for every . Therefore, using the fact that , it can be seen that for every . In the second case, there exists a normal subgroup of G such that for all that also satisfies the condition (19); then the simple computation gives that
which implies that ; therefore, in either case the commutator subgroup is a normal subgroup of . □
Definition 1.
Let G be an arbitrary group. We say a function satisfies the Kannappan condition [11] if
Corollary 3.
Any solution of the functional Equation (7) on an arbitrary group G satisfies the Kannappan condition.
Proof.
The proof depends on three different cases, but in each case, the proof is quite obvious:
Case 1: If , then the result is trivial.
Case 2: Let be strictly positive. The proof is quite simple because the additive function for all .
Case 3: Let be unitary. is a normal subgroup containing the commutator subgroup . Therefore, if and only if if and only if if and only if . As only takes the values 1 and −1, this is enough to prove the Kannappan condition. □
Remark 1.
(1). Any function on an abelian group G satisfies the Kannappan condition.
(2). A function is central and fulfills the Kannappan condition if and only if it is invariant under arbitrary permutations of factors of its arguments, if and only if it is the lift of a function on the abelian quotient group .
Remark 2.(1). It can be seen that Theorem 3 can also be concluded quite easily from Theorem 4, because if G is divisible by two and three, there is no nontrivial subgroup with the required condition (19).
(2). is a normal subgroup of the cyclic group and satisfies the condition (19).
(3). is a normal subgroup of the cyclic group and is a normal subgroup of satisfying the condition (19).
Proposition 1.
Let G be any group. If is a non-zero solution of the functional Equation (7), then for all .
Proof.
According to Corollary 3, the function satisfies the Kannappan condition; therefore, we have . Consequently, by Kannappan condition, the proof of proposition is a result of the following computation:
□
We can get the following proposition, which is a direct consequence of Proposition 1, so we omit the proof.
Proposition 2.
Suppose that a function satisfies the functional Equation (7) such that χ is not identically zero on group G; then for any , we derive the following:
(1) If , then .
(2) If , then .
(3) If , then either or .
The following theorem yields the information about the existence of a normal subgroup of G and will be important to compute more useful results.
Theorem 5.
Let G be any group. Suppose that the non-zero solution satisfies the functional Equation (7); then the following results hold:
(1) Let and for some arbitrary element satisfying the condition that . Then .
(2) Let . Then is a normal subgroup of G.
Proof.
(1). According to the given condition for some , by applying Proposition 2 (3), we can conclude that either or . Therefore, condition yields that .
(2). Given that 1 is a neutral element and , . Let ; then . By Lemma 2, ; therefore, , and hence . Let ; therefore, by the definition of , and .
Proposition 3.
Assume that χ is a non-zero solution of the functional Equation (7) on an arbitrary group G; then .
Proof.
The proof follows directly from Theorems 4 and 5 and Corollary 2. □
Proposition 4.
If χ is a strictly positive solution of Equation (7) on an arbitrary group G, then .
In [10], Toborg has to be taken to prove that the solutions of the functional Equation (3) are of the form for the additive function , and that in the notation of the theorem, the relation can be characterized as if and only if and have the same sign (with the convention that 0 has both signs). The following propositions are obvious consequences of Theorem 3 and what Toborg used to prove her main result. The results of the following propositions are quite obvious and can be easily verified, so we overlook the proof.
Proposition 5.
Let χ be a strictly positive solution of the functional Equation (7) on an arbitrary group G; then relation on group G satisfies the following:
(1) is reflexive;
(2) is symmetric;
(3) Either or ;
(4) if and only if .
Proposition 6.
Let χ be a strictly positive solution of the functional Equation (7) on an arbitrary group G. If for some , then the following results hold:
(1) for any ;
(2) If then .
Proof.
Since G is a strictly positive solution of Equation (7), there exists an additive function such that for any ; therefore, the results become quite obvious because . □
Proposition 7.
Let χ be a strictly positive solution of Equation (7) on an arbitrary group G; then any solution can be interpreted as a function on the abelian factor group .
Author Contributions
Writing—original draft preparation, M.S.; writing—review and editing Q.L. and Y.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, grant number 11971493.
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
Not applicable.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank the anonymous referees for their remarkable comments, suggestions, and ideas that helped to improve this paper.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- Chaljub-Simon, A.; Volkmann, P. Caractérisation du module d’une fonction additive à l’aide d’une équation fonctionnelle. Aequationes Math. 1994, 47, 60–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kochanek, T. On a composite functional equation fulfilled by modulus of an additive function. Aequationes Math. 2010, 80, 155–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tabor, J. On some characterization of the absolute value of an additive function. Ann. Math. Silesianae 1994, 8, 69–77. [Google Scholar]
- Fechner, W. Four inequalities of Volkmann type. J. Math. Inequalities 2011, 5, 463–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gilanyi, A.; Nagatou, K.; Volkmann, P. Stability of a functional equation coming from the characterization of the absolute value of additive functions. Ann. Funct. Anal. 2010, 1, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Redheffer, R.M.; Volkmann, P. Die Funktionalgleichung f(x) + max{f(y), f(−y)} = max{f(x + y), f(x − y)}. In International Series of Numerical Mathematics 123; Birkhauser: Basel, Switzerland, 1997; pp. 311–318. [Google Scholar]
- Badora, R.; Przebieracz, B.; Volkmann, P. On Tabor groupoids and stability of some functional equations. Aequationes Math. 2014, 87, 165–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Jarczyk, W.; Volkmann, P. On functional equations in connection with the absolute value of additive functions. Ser. Math. Catovic. Debr. 2010, 32, 11. [Google Scholar]
- Volkmann, P. Charakterisierung des Betrages reellwertiger additiver Funktionen auf Gruppen. KITopen 2017, 4, 99191049. [Google Scholar]
- Toborg, I. On the functional equation f(x) + f(y) = max{f(xy), f(xy −1)} on groups. Arch. Der Math. 2017, 109, 215–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kannappan, P.L. The functional equation f(xy) + f(xy− 1) = 2f(x)f(y) for groups. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 1968, 19, 69–74. [Google Scholar]
- Sarfraz, M.; Liu, Q.; Li, Y. Stability of Maximum Functional Equation and Some Properties of Groups. Symmetry 2020, 12, 1949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baron, K.; Volkmann, P. Characterization of the absolute value of complex linear functionals by functional equations. Semin. LV 2006, 28, 10. [Google Scholar]
- Przebieracz, B. Superstability of some functional equation. Ser. Math. Catovic. Debr. 2010, 31, 4. [Google Scholar]
- Volkmann, P. Charakterisierung Des Betrages Reeller Determinanten Mit Hilfe Von Funktionalgleichungen. KITopen 2003, 17, 3. [Google Scholar]
- Przebieracz, B. The stability of functional equation min{f(x + y), f(x − y)} = |f(x) − f(y)|. J. Inequalities Appl. 2011, 1, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).